Assisted Living and Memory Care
Bayberry Commons Memory Care
2211 Laura Street, Springfield, OR 97477 · Map
Licensed for 14 residents
Bayberry Commons Memory Care is a state-licensed assisted living, memory care community in Springfield, Oregon. It is licensed for 14 residents. Lilisity publishes no score or ranking for this community; the details below come from the state licensing record.
Prices
This community does not publish its prices.
Area costs
Lilisity’s independent report
What the public record shows
Gathered by Lilisity from state and federal sources. Communities can’t edit this part of the page.
State inspections
Last inspection: Jul 29, 2026. See the record
License
Active, 14 residents
Residential Care Facility (Memory Care endorsement) 50R347.
Nearest emergency room
0.9 miles
Sacred Heart Medical Center - Riverbend, rated 4 of 5 stars by CMS.
Side by side with nearby communities
The 4 nearest communities that offer assisted living, by straight-line distance. Prices are starting prices each community publishes; we never show estimates.
| Community | Distance | Licensed capacity | Published starting price | License | Inspection citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bayberry Commons Memory Care this community | 14 | Not published | Active | 35 deficiencies, 22 violations | |
| Bayberry Commons Assisted Living | 0.0 mi | 62 | Not published | Active | 40 deficiencies, 41 violations |
| Carlty Gardens | 0.5 mi | 28 | Not published | Active | 57 deficiencies, 51 violations |
| The Rawlin at Riverbend | 1.0 mi | 72 | Not published | Active | 32 deficiencies, 68 violations |
| Gateway Gardens | 1.2 mi | 90 | Not published | Active | 15 deficiencies, 11 violations |
State inspection record35 deficiencies, 22 violations
- Last inspection
- July 29, 2026
- Inspections
- 6, 35 deficiencies cited
- Substantiated abuse
- 5
- Substantiated licensing violations
- 17
- Regulatory actions
- 3
- Fines assessed
- $35,188.00 (9 violations)
- Current owner since
- October 1, 2024
License conditions and other regulatory actions
- July 11, 2025 to September 5, 2025: License Condition, Failed to provide safe environment RCFCD25-00732; incident: CALMS - 00083102
Based on preliminary information, received on or about July 9, 2025, a complaint investigation was received. ODHS concludes that Respondents acts or omissions create a situation where the residents of the facility and future residents are at risk of immediate jeopardy. Failure to comply with Oregon Administrative Rules constitutes a threat to the health, safety, and welfare of its residents
Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration); 411-054-0055 (Medications and Treatments) - March 1, 2023 to April 2, 2024: License Condition, Failed to use an ABST RCFCD23-00253; incident: OR0003958600
The facility failed to fully implement an Acuity Based Staffing Tool in accordance with OAR 411-054-0036(1).
Rules: 411-054-0037 (Acuity-Based Staffing Tool) - October 25, 2022 to November 9, 2023: License Condition, Failed to provide safe environment RCFCD22-01553; incident: CALMS - 00033259
Pursuant to ORS 441.736(2)(d) and OAR 411-054-0110(4), DHS notifies Respondent that it intends to issue an Order Imposing License Condition in the immediate future, based on the following statement of violations. Please note that this Notice is a precursor to any Order Imposing License Condition, and consequently the conditions proposed below are not yet in effect.
Rules: 411-054-0020; 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration); 411-054-0027 (Resident Rights and Protections); 411-054-0030 (Resident Services); 411-054-0036 (Service Plan – General); 411-054-0040 (Change of Condition and Monitoring); 411-054-0045 (Resident Health Services); 411-054-0050 (Infection Prevention and Control); 411-054-0055 (Medications and Treatments); 411-054-0070 (Staffing Requirements and Training); 411-054-0090 (Fire and Life Safety); 411-054-0200 (Residential Care Facility Building Requirements); 411-057-0140 (Responsibilities of Administration); 411-057-0150 (Staffing Requirements); 411-057-0160 (Resident Services in a Memory Care Community)
Inspections
- July 29, 2026: Re-Licensure, 2 deficiencies cited report
- C0303: Systems: Treatment Orders severity level 2, scope L2 Isolated
- Z0162: Compliance with Rules Health Care severity level 2, scope L2 Isolated
- August 28, 2025: Change of Owner, 6 deficiencies cited report
- C0231: Reporting & Investigating Abuse-Other Action severity level 2, scope L2 Pattern
- C0270: Change of Condition and Monitoring severity level 2, scope L2 Isolated
- C0295: Infection Prevention & Control severity level 2, scope L2 Pattern
- H1517: Individual Privacy: Own Unit severity level 2, scope L2 Pattern
- H1580: Limitations: Threats To Health And Safety severity level 2, scope L2 Pattern
- Z0164: Activities severity level 2, scope L2 Pattern
- April 16, 2025: Kitchen, 2 deficiencies cited report
- C0240: Resident Services Meals, Food Sanitation Rule severity level 2, scope L2 Widespread
- C0455: Inspections and Investigation: Insp Interval severity level 2, scope L2 Widespread
- Z0142: Administration Compliance severity level 2, scope L2 Widespread
- November 2, 2023: Complaint Investig., 1 deficiency cited report
- C0010: Licensing Complaint Investigation severity level 2, scope L2 Isolated
- C0513: Doors, Walls, Elevators, Odors severity level 2, scope L2 Isolated
- January 10, 2023: Complaint Investig., 1 deficiency cited report
- C0361: Acuity-Based Staffing Tool severity level 2, scope L2 Widespread
- October 10, 2022: Validation, 23 deficiencies cited report
- C0000: Comment severity level 0
- C0150: Facility Administration: Operation severity level 2, scope L2 Widespread, corrected May 13, 2023
- C0160: Reasonable Precautions severity level 2, scope L2 Widespread, corrected September 30, 2023
- C0231: Reporting & Investigating Abuse-Other Action severity level 2, scope L2 Pattern, corrected May 13, 2023
- C0240: Resident Services Meals, Food Sanitation Rule severity level 2, scope L2 Widespread, corrected May 13, 2023
Show all 25
- C0260: Service Plan: General severity level 2, scope L2 Pattern, corrected May 13, 2023
- C0262: Service Plan: Service Planning Team severity level 2, scope L2 Pattern, corrected May 13, 2023
- C0270: Change of Condition and Monitoring severity level 2, scope L2 Pattern, corrected May 13, 2023
- C0280: Resident Health Services severity level 3, scope L3 Isolated, corrected May 13, 2023
- C0295: Infection Prevention & Control severity level 2, scope L2 Widespread, corrected May 13, 2023
- C0302: Systems: Tracking Control Substances severity level 2, scope L2 Pattern, corrected May 13, 2023
- C0310: Systems: Medication Administration severity level 2, scope L2 Pattern, corrected May 13, 2023
- C0330: Systems: Psychotropic Medication severity level 2, scope L2 Pattern, corrected May 13, 2023
- C0360: Staffing Requirements and Training: Staffing severity level 2, scope L2 Widespread, corrected May 13, 2023
- C0372: Training Within 30 Days: Direct Care Staff severity level 2, scope L2 Pattern, corrected May 13, 2023
- C0420: Fire and Life Safety: Safety severity level 2, scope L2 Widespread, corrected May 13, 2023
- C0455: Inspections and Investigation: Insp Interval severity level 2, scope L2 Widespread, corrected September 30, 2023
- C0510: General Building Exterior severity level 2, scope L2 Widespread, corrected September 30, 2023
- C0513: Doors, Walls, Elevators, Odors severity level 2, scope L2 Widespread, corrected May 13, 2023
- C0555: Call Sys, Exit Dr Alarm, Phones, Tv, Or Cable severity level 2, scope L2 Widespread, corrected May 13, 2023
- Z0140: Administration Responsibilities severity level 2, scope L2 Widespread, corrected May 13, 2023
- Z0142: Administration Compliance severity level 2, scope L2 Widespread, corrected September 30, 2023
- Z0155: Staff Training Requirements severity level 2, scope L2 Pattern, corrected May 13, 2023
- Z0162: Compliance With Rules Health Care severity level 3, scope L3 Isolated, corrected May 13, 2023
- Z0168: Outside Area severity level 2, scope L2 Widespread, corrected May 13, 2023
Substantiated abuse or neglect
- July 7, 2025: Failed to administer medication as ordered Abuse: Neglect; Level 4 - Serious harm, death, imminent danger or chronic regulatory noncompliance; fine $2,500.00; report
Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration); 411-054-0027 (Resident Rights and Protections); 411-054-0028 (Reporting and Investigating Abuse and Other Actions Affecting Resident Welfare); 411-054-0030 (Resident Services); 411-054-0036 (Service Plan – General); 411-054-0055 (Medications and Treatments)State’s findings
Alleged Victim (AV) has diagnosis of progressive cognitive impairment, memory loss, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, and congestive heart failure. AV is a resident of a locked memory care facility, which is responsible for providing care, including ordering, storing, and administering all medications to AV. Staff are to begin working on refills of a medication when a resident has seven days left of the medication. AP1 procedures instruct staff to place a resident on alert charting at the first dose of missed medication and to continue documenting attempts to obtain the medication. AP1 uses a computer system which emails a daily report of missed medications. AP1 management staff failed to review the missed medication report. AV is prescribed blood thinning medication twice a day. On or about June 22 and 23, 2025, AV missed the 8:00am dose of AV's blood thinning medication, and all doses from June 26, 2025, to July 7, 2025. AV missed the 8:00am of beta blocker medication from June 27, 2025, to July 2, 2025. During the period of June 22, 2025, to July 7, 2025, AV was not placed on alert charting for the missed blood thinning medication. AV was on alert charting for other missed medications. On or about July 7, 2025, AV began to show stroke-like symptoms and was sent to the hospital. While at the hospital, AV's blood was found to be out of intended therapeutic range of someone on blood thinning medication. AV returned to AP1 after being hospitalized but with significant deficits, including never regaining consciousness. AV passed away on July 12, 2025. The facility failed to provide a safe medication administration system and administer medication as ordered, which is a violation of resident rights is considered neglect of care and constitutes abuse.
- December 27, 2023: Failed to properly plan care Abuse: Neglect; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; fine $188.00; report
Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration); 411-054-0027 (Resident Rights and Protections); 411-054-0028 (Reporting and Investigating Abuse and Other Actions Affecting Resident Welfare); 411-054-0036 (Service Plan – General)State’s findings
According to the documentation, the facility failed to implement appropriate fall interventions for the Alleged Victim’s (AV) known fall history. On or about December 22, 2023, the AV attempted to self-transfer and was found on the floor in their apartment with their arms looped in the wheelchair causing pain and bruising, which is a violation of resident rights, is considered neglect of are and constitutes abuse.
- May 1, 2022: Failed to properly plan care Abuse: Neglect; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; fine $500.00; report
Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration); 411-054-0027 (Resident Rights and Protections); 411-054-0028 (Reporting and Investigating Abuse and Other Actions Affecting Resident Welfare); 411-054-0036 (Service Plan – General)State’s findings
The Alleged Victim (AV) has a history of unexplained bruising. During a 3 month span of time, from May 2022 until September 2022, AV was reported to have unexplained bruising on at least 10 different occasions. The facility did place tubi grips on AV's arms in August to protect AV from him/herself grabbing their arms, however, AV took them off regularly. AV's care plan was not updated sufficiently or quickly enough to address these bruising incidents, leaving AV at a risk for serious harm. The facility's failure is a violation of resident rights, is considered neglect of care and constitutes abuse.
- January 9, 2022: Failed to properly plan care Abuse: Neglect; Level 3 - Moderate harm or potential for serious harm; fine $1,500.00; report
Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration); 411-054-0027 (Resident Rights and Protections); 411-054-0028 (Reporting and Investigating Abuse and Other Actions Affecting Resident Welfare); 411-054-0036 (Service Plan – General)State’s findings
The Alleged Victim (AV) resides in a room in the facility that shares a bathroom with another resident. The other resident wanders into AV's room, which is upsetting to AV. On or about January 8, 2022, AV was trying to alert staff that his/her neighbor was in his/her room, and AV suffered a fall, causing bruising to his/her back and shoulder. On or about January 9, 2022, AV fell again, hitting his/her head and suffering left hip pain, which resulted in AV being sent to the hospital and being diagnosed with a hip fracture. It is unclear if AV was trying to use the restroom or trying to notify staff of the neighbor in his/her room. The facility failed to properly care plan to reduce AV's falls, which is a violation of resident rights, is considered neglect of care and constitutes abuse.
- December 4, 2021: Failed to properly plan care Abuse: Neglect; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; fine $500.00; report
Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration); 411-054-0027 (Resident Rights and Protections); 411-054-0028 (Reporting and Investigating Abuse and Other Actions Affecting Resident Welfare); 411-054-0036 (Service Plan – General); 411-054-0040 (Change of Condition and Monitoring); 411-054-0045 (Resident Health Services)State’s findings
On or about December 4, 2021, the Alleged Victim (AV) suffered a fall, causing bruising and an injury to his/her pinky finger, which was red, swollen and warm to the touch. AV has had previous falls, however, no fall interventions were put into place to ensure resident safety, and AV's care plan was out of date, with many incorrect citations in his/her care plan. Alleged Perpetrator #2 (AP2) was advised of the falls, however, did not complete any assessment of AV after his/her fall, nor did AP2 update AV's care plan. AP2's actions are a violation of resident rights, are considered neglect of care and constitute abuse. The facility failure is a violation of resident rights, is considered neglect of care and constitutes abuse.
Substantiated licensing violations
- January 20, 2026: Failed to make facility or resident records accessible Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
State’s findings
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide records to the Department upon request. The facility’s failure is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.
- January 20, 2026: Failed to make facility or resident records accessible Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
Rules: 411-054-0105 (Inspections and Investigations)State’s findings
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide records to the Department upon request. The facility’s failure is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.
- January 20, 2026: Failed to make facility or resident records accessible Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
Rules: 411-054-0105 (Inspections and Investigations)State’s findings
The facility failed to make records available to the Department upon request. The facility’s failure is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.
- July 7, 2025: Failed to provide a safe medication administration system Licensing Violation; Level 4 - Serious harm, death, imminent danger or chronic regulatory noncompliance; report
Rules: 411-054-0055 (Medications and Treatments)State’s findings
Based on interview and record review, conducted during a site visit on 07/15/25, the facility’s failure to ensure adequate professional oversight of the medication and treatment administration system was substantiated for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#1). This posed an immediate jeopardy situation, which put the health and safety of residents at risk. Findings include, but are not limited to: Administrative oversight of the medication and treatment administration system was found to be ineffective, based on deficiencies in the following areas: C0303: Systems: Medication and Treatment Orders. A review of the physician's orders dated 05/12/25 indicated the following: Eliquis oral tablet 2.5 mg, give one tablet by mouth twice a day for atrial fibrillation; and Metoprolol oral tablet extended release 24-hour 50 mg, give one tablet by mouth once daily for hypertension. A review of Resident 1’s MARs from 06/01/25 through 07/11/25 indicated the following: Eliquis 2.5 mg tablet for the 8:00 am dose had not been provided to the resident on 06/22/25, 06/23/25, and 06/26/25 through 07/07/25. On 07/03/25, the resident had not received his/her 8:00 pm dose. The resident missed a total of 15 doses of medication; and Metoprolol 50 mg had not been provided from 06/27/25 through 07/02/25. The resident missed a total of 6 doses of medication. The facility’s policy and procedure for medication and treatment orders dated 05/01/25, indicated the following: If a resident misses a medication due to the medication being unavailable, the med tech must document on the MAR the applicable medication and efforts to obtain them. Staff should attempt to obtain medication immediately and follow up until the issue has been resolved. Notify the Nurse, ED, and prescriber for medications not given due to being unavailable; Place the resident on alert charting and include what has been done or needs to be followed up on to get the medication in the community in the alert charting entry; Put an ISP in place to note what needs to be monitored by staff due to the missed medication; Refills must be ordered before a medication reaches a seven-day supply; Once refills have been requested, each shift must follow up until the medication arrives; Document all efforts made to obtain medications timely, including phone calls, faxes, non-coverage notices, and coordinate with the prescriber or pharmacy; Any medications requested but not received require immediate follow-up. A review of Resident 1’s progress notes dated 06/01/25 through 07/12/25 indicated the following: There had been no alert charting or monitoring for missed medications; There had been no chart notes indicating the facility's efforts to obtain the necessary medications; On 07/03/25, the med tech called the PCP’s office at 9:45 am regarding refills of the Eliquis and Metoprolol medication; On 07/03/25, the updated E-Rx was received for Metoprolol, MAR order was verified to match the E-script; On 07/08/25 the resident was sent out to the hospital on 07/07/25 with a confirmed stroke on 07/08/25; On 07/09/25, the resident returned from the hospital; and On 07/12/25, the resident had passed away on 07/11/25. Fax communication from the facility to the pharmacy and physician indicated the following: On 06/24/25, the facility inquired to refill Resident 1’s Metoprolol 50 mg prescription; On 06/25/25, the facility inquired to refill Resident 1’s Eliquis 2.5 mg prescription; and On 07/02/25, the facility followed up with the request to fill both Metoprolol 50 mg and Eliquis 2.5 mg. Stating, “Resident has been out for a week.” An incident report dated 07/09/25 indicated the facility nurse was notified by the med tech that the resident had been sent to the hospital for a possible stroke on 07/07/25. The nurse received an update from family/hospital regarding the resident's stroke when the evening shift med tech asked if his/her medications were related to the stroke. The nurse asked what the med tech meant. Med tech then stated that the resident had been missing [his/her] morning dose of 2.5mg Eliquis since 06/26/25. The nurse had not been notified that s/he was out of the medication. The resident was not placed on alert for the missed Eliquis. The resident's Eliquis order stated to give 2.5mg twice daily for anticoagulant therapy related to the atrial fibrillation diagnosis. ln addition to the missed Eliquis dose, the resident had missed Metoprolol 50mg tablet from 06/27/25 through 07/02/25 when it came back in stock. The resident was not placed on alert for missed doses of Metoprolol. Eliquis and Metoprolol both required a refill script from a primary care provider. Primary care provider had been faxed on 06/24/25, 06/25/25, and 07/02/25 for new scripts. Med tech called on 07/03/25 for a new script of Eliquis to be sent to the community. The resident had Eliquis available in the evening shift medication drawer and was receiving 2.5mg of Eliquis every day on swing shift until 07/06/25, which was the evening shift before being sent out to the hospital. During an interview, Staff 1 (Executive Director) confirmed that the facility had not made adequate efforts to obtain the resident’s medication. There had been no ISP or alert charting for the missed medication, and no monitoring of potential side effects as a result of missed medication. The facility nurse had not been notified until after the resident was sent to the hospital due to a stroke. The facility failed to provide a safe medication system by not re-ordering a resident's medication on time and not following up with the refill request to ensure it was filled. This resulted in the resident not receiving his/her medication for atrial fibrillation and required emergency medical care. On 07/15/25, at approximately 4:00 pm, the Department requested an immediate plan of correction. An acceptable plan of correction was received from the facility on 07/15/25 at approximately 5:07 pm. The immediate risk was addressed; however, the facility will need to evaluate the overall system failures associated with the licensing violation. The facility’s failure to ensure adequate professional oversight of the medication and treatment administration system was substantiated.
- July 7, 2025: Failed to administer medication as ordered Licensing Violation; Level 4 - Serious harm, death, imminent danger or chronic regulatory noncompliance; report
Rules: 411-054-0055 (Medications and Treatments)State’s findings
Based on interview and record review, conducted during a site visit on 07/15/25, the facility’s failure to carry out medication and treatment orders as prescribed was substantiated for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#1). Findings include, but are not limited to: A review of the physician's orders dated 05/12/25 indicated the following: Eliquis oral tablet 2.5 mg, give one tablet by mouth twice a day for atrial fibrillation; and Metoprolol oral tablet extended release 24-hour 50 mg, give one tablet by mouth once daily for hypertension. A review of Resident 1’s MARs from 06/01/25 through 07/11/25 indicated the following: Eliquis 2.5 mg tablet for the 8:00 am dose had not been provided to the resident on 06/22/25, 06/23/25, and 06/26/25 through 07/07/25. On 07/03/25, the resident had not received his/her 8:00 pm dose. The resident missed a total of 15 doses of medication; and Metoprolol 50 mg had not been provided from 06/27/25 through 07/02/25. The resident missed a total of 6 doses of medication. The facility’s policy and procedure for medication and treatment orders dated 05/01/25, indicated the following: If a resident misses a medication due to the medication being unavailable, the med tech must document on the MAR the applicable medication and efforts to obtain them. Staff should attempt to obtain medication immediately and follow up until the issue has been resolved. Notify the Nurse, ED, and prescriber for medications not given due to being unavailable; Place the resident on alert charting and include what has been done or needs to be followed up on to get the medication in the community in the alert charting entry; Put an ISP in place to note what needs to be monitored by staff due to the missed medication; Refills must be ordered before a medication reaches a seven-day supply; Once refills have been requested, each shift must follow up until the medication arrives; Document all efforts made to obtain medications timely, including phone calls, faxes, non-coverage notices, and coordinate with the prescriber or pharmacy; Any medications requested but not received require immediate follow-up. A review of Resident 1’s progress notes dated 06/01/25 through 07/12/25 indicated the following: There had been no alert charting or monitoring for missed medications; There had been no chart notes indicating the facility's efforts to obtain the necessary medications; On 07/03/25, the med tech called the PCP’s office at 9:45 am regarding refills of the Eliquis and Metoprolol medication; On 07/03/25, the updated E-Rx was received for Metoprolol, MAR order was verified to match the E-script; On 07/08/25 the resident was sent out to the hospital on 07/07/25 with a confirmed stroke on 07/08/25; On 07/09/25, the resident returned from the hospital; and On 07/12/25, the resident had passed away on 07/11/25. Fax communication from the facility to the pharmacy and physician indicated the following: On 06/24/25, the facility inquired to refill Resident 1’s Metoprolol 50 mg prescription; On 06/25/25, the facility inquired to refill Resident 1’s Eliquis 2.5 mg prescription; and On 07/02/25, the facility followed up with the request to fill both Metoprolol 50 mg and Eliquis 2.5 mg. Stating, “Resident has been out for a week.” An incident report dated 07/09/25 indicated the facility nurse was notified by the med tech that the resident had been sent to the hospital for a possible stroke on 07/07/25. The nurse received an update from family/hospital regarding the resident's stroke when the evening shift med tech asked if his/her medications were related to the stroke. The nurse asked what the med tech meant. Med tech then stated that the resident had been missing his/her morning dose of 2.5mg Eliquis since 06/26/25. The nurse had not been notified that s/he was out of the medication. The resident was not placed on alert for the missed Eliquis. The resident's Eliquis order stated to give 2.5mg twice daily for anticoagulant therapy related to the atrial fibrillation diagnosis. ln addition to the missed Eliquis dose, the resident had missed Metoprolol 50mg tablet from 06/27/25 through 07/02/25 when it came back in stock. The resident was not placed on alert for missed doses of Metoprolol. Eliquis and Metoprolol both required a refill script from a primary care provider. Primary care provider had been faxed on 06/24/25, 06/25/25, and 07/02/25 for new scripts. Med tech called on 07/03/25 for a new script of Eliquis to be sent to the community. The resident had Eliquis available in the evening shift medication drawer and was receiving 2.5mg of Eliquis every day on swing shift until 07/06/25, which was the evening shift before being sent out to the hospital. During an interview with Staff 1 (Executive Director) confirmed that the facility had not made adequate efforts to obtain the resident’s medication. There had been no ISP or alert charting for the missed medication, and no monitoring of potential side effects as a result of missed medication. The facility nurse had not been notified until after the resident was sent to the hospital due to a stroke. The facility failed to provide a safe medication system by not re-ordering a resident's medication on time and not following up with the refill request to ensure it was filled. This resulted in the resident not receiving his/her medication for atrial fibrillation and required emergency medical care. The facility’s failure to carry out medication and treatment orders as prescribed was substantiated.
Show all 17
- July 7, 2025: Failed to follow care plan Licensing Violation; Level 4 - Serious harm, death, imminent danger or chronic regulatory noncompliance; report
Rules: 411-054-0036 (Service Plan – General)State’s findings
Based on interview and record review, conducted during a site visit on 07/15/25, the facility’s failure to ensure the implementation of services was substantiated for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#1). Findings include, but are not limited to: Compliance Specialist (CS) was unable to interview Resident 1 or make observations as s/he was no longer in the facility. The following documents were reviewed: Resident 1 service plan dated 06/24/25 and 07/09/25 indicated the following: Resident needs staff to order, administer, and store all medications; and Staff to fax the pharmacy with any medications needing to be re-ordered or new medication changes. An incident report dated 07/09/25 indicated the following: The facility nurse was notified by med tech that the resident had been sent to the hospital for a possible stroke on 07/07/25. Med tech stated that the resident had been missing his/her morning dose of 2.5mg Eliquis since 06/26/25. The nurse had not been notified that s/he was out of the medication. The resident was not placed on alert for the missed Eliquis. ln addition to the missed Eliquis dose, the resident had missed Metoprolol 50mg tablet from 06/27/25 through 07/02/25. The resident was not placed on alert for missed doses of Metoprolol. Eliquis and Metoprolol both required a refill script from a primary care provider. Primary care provider had been faxed on 06/24/25, 06/25/25, and 07/02/25 for new scripts. Med tech called on 07/03/25 for a new script of Eliquis to be sent to the community. The investigation conducted by the facility indicated the facility had followed Resident 1’s service plan. An interview with Staff 1 (Executive Director) indicated the facility had not followed the resident's service plan regarding the re-ordering of mediation. The facility’s failure to ensure the implementation of services was substantiated
- July 7, 2025: Failed to provide oversight and monitoring of change of condition Licensing Violation; Level 4 - Serious harm, death, imminent danger or chronic regulatory noncompliance; report
Rules: 411-054-0040 (Change of Condition and Monitoring)State’s findings
Based on interview and record review, conducted during a site visit on 07/15/25, the facility's failure to ensure that a resident monitoring and reporting system is implemented 24 hours a day was substantiated for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#1). This posed an immediate jeopardy situation, which put the health and safety of residents at risk. Findings include, but are not limited to: Compliance Specialist (CS) was unable to interview Resident 1 or make observations as s/he was no longer in the facility. The facility’s policy and procedure for medication and treatment orders dated 05/01/25, indicated the following: If a resident misses a medication due to the medication being unavailable, the med tech must document on the MAR the applicable medication and efforts to obtain them. Staff should attempt to obtain medication immediately and follow up until the issue has been resolved. Notify the Nurse, ED, and prescriber for medications not given due to being unavailable; Place the resident on alert charting and include what has been done or needs to be followed up on to get the medication in the community in the alert charting entry; Put an ISP in place to note what needs to be monitored by staff due to the missed medication; Refills must be ordered before a medication reaches a seven-day supply; Once refills have been requested, each shift must follow up until the medication arrives; Document all efforts made to obtain medications timely, including phone calls, faxes, non-coverage notices, and coordinate with the prescriber or pharmacy; Any medications requested but not received require immediate follow-up. A review of Resident 1’s progress notes dated 06/01/25 through 07/12/25 indicated the following: There had been no alert charting or monitoring for missed medications; There had been no chart notes indicating the facility's efforts to obtain the necessary medications; On 07/03/25, the med tech called the PCP’s office at 9:45 am regarding refills of the Eliquis and Metoprolol medication; On 07/03/25, the updated E-Rx was received for Metoprolol, MAR order was verified to match the E-script; On 07/08/25 the resident was sent out to the hospital on 07/07/25 with a confirmed stroke on 07/08/25; On 07/09/25, the resident returned from the hospital; and On 07/12/25, the resident had passed away on 07/11/25. Fax communication from the facility to the pharmacy and physician indicated the following: On 06/24/25, the facility inquired to refill Resident 1’s Metoprolol 50 mg prescription; On 06/25/25, the facility inquired to refill Resident 1’s Eliquis 2.5 mg prescription; and On 07/02/25, the facility followed up with the request to fill both Metoprolol 50 mg and Eliquis 2.5 mg. Stating, “Resident has been out for a week.” An incident report dated 07/09/25 indicated the facility nurse was notified by the med tech that the resident had been sent to the hospital for a possible stroke on 07/07/25. The nurse received an update from family/hospital regarding the resident's stroke when the evening shift med tech asked if his/her medications were related to the stroke. The nurse asked what the med tech meant. Med tech then stated that the resident had been missing his/her morning dose of 2.5mg Eliquis since 06/26/25. The nurse had not been notified that s/he was out of the medication. The resident was not placed on alert for the missed Eliquis. The resident's Eliquis order stated to give 2.5mg twice daily for anticoagulant therapy related to the atrial fibrillation diagnosis. ln addition to the missed Eliquis dose, the resident had missed Metoprolol 50mg tablet from 06/27/25 through 07/02/25 when it came back in stock. The resident was not placed on alert for missed doses of Metoprolol. Eliquis and Metoprolol both required a refill script from a primary care provider. Primary care provider had been faxed on 06/24/25, 06/25/25, and 07/02/25 for new scripts. Med tech called on 07/03/25 for a new script of Eliquis to be sent to the community. The resident had Eliquis available in the evening shift medication drawer and was receiving 2.5mg of Eliquis every day on swing shift until 07/06/25, which was the evening shift before being sent out to the hospital. During an interview with Staff 1 (Executive Director) confirmed that the facility had not made adequate efforts to obtain the resident’s medication. There had been no ISP or alert charting for the missed medication, and no monitoring of potential side effects as a result of missed medication. The facility nurse had not been notified until after the resident was sent to the hospital due to a stroke. On 07/15/25, at approximately 4:00 pm, the Department requested an immediate plan of correction. An acceptable plan of correction was received from the facility on 07/15/25 at approximately 5:07 pm. The immediate risk was addressed; however, the facility will need to evaluate the overall system failures associated with the licensing violation. The facility failed to monitor a resident’s condition after running out of prescribed medication. The resident missed multiple doses of Eliquis 2.5 mg and Metoprolol 50 mg medications, had a stroke, and was admitted to the hospital on 7/7/2025. The resident was discharged back to the facility on 7/9/2025 and passed away on 7/11/2025. The facility’s failure to ensure that a resident monitoring and reporting system is implemented 24 hours a day was substantiated.
- September 23, 2024: Failed to provide safe environment Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration); 411-054-0027 (Resident Rights and Protections); 411-054-0028 (Reporting and Investigating Abuse and Other Actions Affecting Resident Welfare)State’s findings
Alleged Victim (AV) is known to attempt to ingest foreign substances. On or about September 17, 2024 AV was found with an open bottle of conditioner lifted to AV's mouth. Witness 2 (W2) took the bottle of conditioner from AV. It is unknown how much conditioner was consumed by AV, if any at all. W2 informed Alleged Perpetrator 2 (AP2), AV may have consumed some conditioner. AP2 advised W2 to put AV on alert charting and implement a Temporary Care Plan, but did not implement any further interventions. Poison Control was not called to determine if AV needed to be sent to the hospital for evaluation. It is AP1's policy to call poison control after a suspected poisoning due to ingesting unknown or foreign substances. Employees are also expected to inform the executive director of all incidents and write an incident report, neither of which were done by AP2. The risk of harm to AV by drinking conditioner would be nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea. AP2 did not follow AP1's policy, and did not provide a safe environment for AV, which is a violation of resident rights, is considered neglect of care and constitutes abuse. The facility failed to ensure a safe environment, which is a violation of Oregon Administrative rules.
- November 2, 2023: Failed to provide a homelike environment Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
Rules: 411-054-0200 (Residential Care Facility Building Requirements)State’s findings
The facility failed to keep the interior of the facility free from unpleasant odors and keep clean all interior materials and surfaces. An investigation determined a licensing violation occurred.
- April 26, 2023: Failed to provide appropriate staffing Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
Rules: 411-054-0070 (Staffing Requirements and Training)State’s findings
The facility failed to provide direct care staff sufficient in number to meet the scheduled and unscheduled needs of the residents. An investigation determined a licensing violation occurred.
- April 26, 2023: Failed to assure resident rights Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
Rules: 411-054-0027 (Resident Rights and Protections)State’s findings
The facility failed to treat residents with dignity and respect. An investigation determined a licensing violation occurred.
- November 20, 2022: Failed to protect resident from physical abuse Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration); 411-054-0027 (Resident Rights and Protections)State’s findings
According to documentation, Alleged Perpetrator 2 (AP2) failed to follow Alleged Victim’s (AV) care plan when s/he refuses cares. The failure resulted in AP2 grabbing AV by the hands and wrist, pulling the AV up out of a recliner against their will, causing bruising and swelling to AV’s hands and wrist. AP2’s actions are considered physical abuse. The facility failed to protect AV from physical abuse, which is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.
- September 19, 2022: Failed to provide safe environment Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration); 411-054-0027 (Resident Rights and Protections); 411-054-0028 (Reporting and Investigating Abuse and Other Actions Affecting Resident Welfare); 411-054-0036 (Service Plan – General)State’s findings
On or about September 19, 2022, the Alleged Victim (AV) was found to have bruising on top of his/her right hand. The facility failed to complete an internal investigation to determine the cause of bruising. AV has a history of easily bruising and skin tears. The facility's failure is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.
- June 1, 2022: Failed to submit timely or adequate staffing documentation Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; fine $7,500.00; report
Rules: 411-061-0010State’s findings
On or about June 1, 2022, the Oregon Health Authority reported to the Department that Respondent failed to comply with weekly reporting requirements of vaccinated individuals, residents and staff, to the proper authority as required by law. This failure has been ongoing from May 1, 2022 to May 31, 2022, for a total of 30 days.
- May 2, 2022: Failed to submit timely or adequate staffing documentation Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; fine $7,500.00; report
Rules: 411-061-0010State’s findings
On or about May 1, 2022, the Oregon Health Authority reported to the Department that Respondent failed to comply with weekly reporting requirements of vaccinated individuals, residents and staff, to the proper authority as required by law. This failure has been ongoing from April 1, 2022 to April 30, 2022, for a total of 30 days.
- April 1, 2022: Failed to submit timely or adequate staffing documentation Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; fine $7,500.00; report
Rules: 411-061-0010State’s findings
On or about April 1, 2022, the Oregon Health Authority reported to the Department that Respondent failed to comply with weekly reporting requirements of vaccinated individuals, residents and staff, to the proper authority as required by law. This failure has been ongoing from March 1, 2022 to March 31, 2022, for a total of 30 days.
- March 1, 2022: Failed to submit timely or adequate staffing documentation Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; fine $7,500.00; report
Rules: 411-061-0010State’s findings
On or about March 1, 2022, the Oregon Health Authority reported to the Department that Respondent failed to comply with weekly reporting requirements of vaccinated individuals, residents and staff, to the proper authority as required by law. This failure has been ongoing from February 1, 2022 to February 28, 2022, for a total of 27 days.
Read the full record on the state’s site →
ODHS lists only substantiated violations: “either a substantiated instance of abuse or a licensing violation. Open investigations and complaints that are being appealed by the provider are not listed.” Oregon counts neglect as a form of abuse; see the state’s definitions of abuse. Each violation shows the level ODHS gives it, in the state’s words (for example “2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm”), and any fine ODHS assessed. Inspection citations show the state’s severity level and scope, and the date ODHS recorded the problem as corrected when it lists one. Rule names come from the Oregon Administrative Rules. ODHS: “Formal regulatory actions can range from a condition placed upon a license due to non-compliance or a notice to revoke a license.” This community is licensed for 14 residents; larger communities are inspected and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Oregon Department of Human Services, Long-Term Care Licensing, data as of October 15, 2026, showing the last five years. Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.
License and ownershipActive license
- License type
- Residential Care Facility (Memory Care endorsement)
- License number
- 50R347
- License status
- Active
- Licensed capacity
- 14
- County
- Lane County
Source: Oregon state licensing records (agency listing), retrieved 2026-09-09. Licensing status is a matter of public record; it is not a quality rating.
Paying with Medicaid and other programsOn the Oregon list of Medicaid providers (2026)
On the Oregon list of Medicaid providers. Listed as Bayberry Commons Memory Care under Accepts Medicaid (ODHS licensing record). (state list, as of Sep 9, 2026)
Being on the list means the community has taken part in the program. Ask whether it has a Medicaid opening now, and how many residents it serves on Medicaid.
Location and nearby careNearest hospital 0.9 mi, nursing home 1.2 mi, pharmacy 0.4 mi
- Nearest hospital with an emergency room
- Sacred Heart Medical Center - Riverbend, Springfield. 0.9 miles away, straight line. CMS overall hospital rating: 4 of 5 stars.
- Nearest Medicare nursing home
- Marquis Springfield, Springfield. 1.2 miles away, straight line.
- Nearest home health agency office
- Sacred Heart Home Health, Springfield. 1.4 miles away, straight line. Agencies travel to clients, so ask which ones serve this address.
- Nearest pharmacy
- Walgreens. 0.4 miles away, straight line. From OpenStreetMap, which does not list every pharmacy, so one may be closer.
- Area
- USDA classes ZIP code 97477 as metropolitan (metropolitan core).
- Dialysis within 15 miles
- Qualicenters - Eugene-Springfield Ltd, Springfield, 0.6 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 4 of 5 stars)
Fmc Emerald Valley, Springfield, 0.6 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 5 of 5 stars)
Fmc Eugene, Eugene, 5.0 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 3 of 5 stars) - Hospice
- 7 Medicare hospices tell CMS they serve ZIP code 97477.
Bristol Hospice - Eugene LLC, office in Springfield, 1.1 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 3 of 5 stars)
Sacred Heart Hospice, office in Springfield, 1.4 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 4 of 5 stars)
Cascade Health, office in Eugene, 2.3 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 4 of 5 stars) - Nearest geriatric medicine practice
- Peacehealth, Springfield. 1.0 mile away, straight line. 1 geriatric medicine doctor listed there.
Distances are straight lines from the community, not driving distance. Hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors come from CMS provider data (CMS, hospital list updated Jul 22, 2026). Star ratings are CMS’s own.
Emergency and natural hazard riskFEMA overall risk relatively high; outside FEMA's high-risk flood areas
Public hazard maps for this location. Ask the community about its emergency plan, its generator and where residents would go in an evacuation.
- Flood zone
- Outside the high and moderate risk flood areas on FEMA's flood map (Zone X, minimal flood hazard, or not studied). (FEMA flood map)
- FEMA National Risk Index
- Overall: relatively high. By hazard: inland flooding very high, wildfire very low, tornado very low, heat wave relatively low, earthquake relatively high. These are FEMA’s ratings for the census tract, compared with tracts nationwide. (FEMA, December 2025)
A flood zone describes the map at this point, not the building's elevation. In an emergency, follow the local emergency management agency.
Questions to ask on a tour10 questions picked for this community from its record
Picked for this community from its record. Ask them in person and write down the answers.
- The state recorded a finding in July 2026. What was it, and how was it fixed?
- What does the base rate include, and when did rates last go up?
- How many caregivers work in memory care during the day, the evening and overnight, and for how many residents?
- What dementia training does each caregiver get before working alone, and every year after?
- How do staff respond when a resident is agitated, frightened or tries to leave?
- How many caregivers are on duty during the day and at night?
- What happens if care needs increase? When would someone need to move?
- What fees are charged at move-in?
- How do you tell families about falls, illness or changes?
- How long have the executive director and the head of care been here?
What we checked13 public sources we searched, with dates
Every public source we searched for this community. “Nothing on record” means we found no record that matched it. A record can be missed when a name or address differs.
| Source | Data as of | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Oregon Department of Human Services, Long-Term Care Licensing inspection records | Oct 15, 2026 | See above |
| Oregon Medicaid provider list | Sep 9, 2026 | See above |
| U.S. Department of Labor wage and hour cases | Oct 15, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| OSHA workplace safety inspections since 2016 | Oct 15, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| FEMA flood map | See above | |
| USDA wildfire risk | Apr 15, 2026 | Not shown: FEMA rates wildfire risk here very low |
| FEMA National Risk Index | See above | |
| CMS hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors; OpenStreetMap pharmacies | See above | |
| HUD Multifamily Properties - Assisted | Jul 6, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| State Veterans Homes (NASVH directory) | Sep 20, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| CMS Hospice - General Information | Aug 19, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| CMS Home Health Care Agencies | May 27, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| The community’s own website | Could not read the site |
Common questionsAnswers to 4 questions families ask
What type of care does Bayberry Commons Memory Care provide?
Bayberry Commons Memory Care is licensed by the state of Oregon for assisted living, memory care in Springfield, Oregon. Its licensed capacity is 14 residents.
Does Lilisity rate Bayberry Commons Memory Care?
No. We publish state licensing details for Bayberry Commons Memory Care but no score, rating, or ranking. Only communities on the Top Communities list or with a Senior Living Alliance Excellence Award, both based on phone-verified resident and family interviews, are ranked.
How much does Bayberry Commons Memory Care cost?
Assisted Living in Oregon typically starts at $4,600 to $5,800 a month. Based on 108 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price. Bayberry Commons Memory Care does not publish its prices.
How do I contact Bayberry Commons Memory Care?
Use Bayberry Commons Memory Care's website, bayberrycommons.com, or visit at 2211 Laura Street, Springfield, OR 97477.
How Lilisity works. The only scores or rankings Lilisity publishes are the Top Communities list and the Excellence Awards, both built from phone-verified resident and family interviews. Communities can pay Lilisity a flat monthly fee to manage their own listing: photos, prices, contact details, and receiving the inquiries families choose to send them. The fee is the same no matter how many families contact them or move in. Senior Living Alliance, which runs Lilisity, offers the same listing to its member communities as part of their membership; members pay SLA for its resident and family interview program. No community pays Lilisity per inquiry, per referral or per move-in. Payment never changes a testimonial, a rating, or the order of search results. The "Nearby Senior Living Alliance communities" box shows member communities only. How we verify testimonials · How we are paid