Assisted Living
Gems Assisted Living
2136 Senita Drive, Lake Havasu City, AZ 86403 · Map
Licensed for 6 residents
Gems Assisted Living is a state-licensed assisted living community in Lake Havasu City, Arizona. It is licensed for 6 residents. Lilisity publishes no score or ranking for this community; the details below come from the state licensing record.
Prices
This community does not publish its prices.
Area costs
Lilisity’s independent report
What the public record shows
Gathered by Lilisity from state and federal sources. Communities can’t edit this part of the page.
State inspections
Last inspection: Apr 28, 2026. See the record
License
Active, 6 residents
Assisted Living Home-Directed AL11108H.
Nearest emergency room
0.6 miles
Havasu Regional Medical Center, rated 3 of 5 stars by CMS.
Side by side with nearby communities
The 4 nearest communities that offer assisted living, by straight-line distance. Prices are starting prices each community publishes; we never show estimates.
| Community | Distance | Licensed capacity | Published starting price | License | Inspection citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gems Assisted Living this community | 6 | Not published | Active | 22 deficiencies, 2 enforcement cases | |
| Prestige Assisted Living at Lake Havasu | 0.5 mi | 67 | Not published | Active | No record |
| Lake House Assisted Living | 1.0 mi | 16 | Not published | Active | 6 deficiencies, 1 enforcement case |
| Lake View Terrace Memory Care Residence | 1.1 mi | 72 | Not published | Active | 43 deficiencies, 6 enforcement cases |
| Neighbors Assisted Living South | 1.9 mi | 16 | Not published | Active | 3 deficiencies, 1 enforcement case |
State inspection record22 deficiencies, 2 enforcement cases
- Last inspection
- April 28, 2026
- Inspections
- 3, 22 deficiencies cited
- Complaint inspections
- 2, 2 with deficiencies cited
- Enforcement cases
- 2, $2,750 in civil penalties
- License active since 2019
Enforcement cases
- May 30, 2025: Civil Penalty $750 (complete) case closed (complete)
- April 4, 2024: Civil Penalty $2,000 (complete) case closed (complete)
April 28, 2026: complaint, compliance (annual) inspection, 6 deficiencies
- Emergency responders; patient information; hospitals; discharge planning; patient screenings; discharge document A.R.S. § 36-420.04.C
Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the assisted living home failed to maintain a standardized form for each resident that included the information prescribed in subsection A of this section.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: August 3, 2026 - Residency and Residency Agreements R9-10-807.D.1-10
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure that before or at the time of an individual’s acceptance by an assisted living facility, there was a documented residency agreement with the assisted living facility that included a list of the services available from the assisted living facility at an additional fee or charge, whether the manager or a caregiver were awake during nighttime hours, the policy for refunding fees, charges, or deposits, the policy and procedure for a resident to terminate residency, including terminating residency because services were not provided ...
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: August 3, 2026 - Service Plans R9-10-808.A.5.b
Based on record review, documentation review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a resident had a service plan that was established, documented, and implemented that when initially developed and when updated, was signed and dated by the manager, for one of two residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk if the service plan was not developed to articulate decisions and agreements.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: April 28, 2026 - Service Plans R9-10-808.C.1.g
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a caregiver documents the services provided in the resident’s medical record, for one of two residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk if a resident did not receive needed services.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: August 3, 2026 - Medical Records R9-10-811.C.3.a
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a resident’s medical record contained the name and contact information of the resident’s representative and the document signed by the resident consenting for the resident’s representative to act on the resident’s behalf, for one of four residents sampled.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: August 1, 2026 - Physical Plant Standards R9-10-821.D.4.b.i-ii
Based on observation, documentation review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a resident’s sleeping area was not used as a passageway to a common area unless the resident’s sleeping area was used as a passageway to another area before October 1, 2013, and written consent was obtained from the resident or the resident’s representative. The deficient practice posed a potential privacy rights violation to the resident.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: July 22, 2026
April 8, 2025: compliance (annual) inspection, 5 deficiencies
- Health care institutions; fall prevention and fall recovery; training programs; definition A.R.S. § 36-420.01.A
Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the governing authority failed to administer a training program for all staff regarding fall prevention and fall recovery. The deficient practice posed a risk if a staff member was not properly trained to assist a resident who had fallen and was unable to recover independently.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: July 7, 2025 - Tuberculosis Screening R9-10-113.A.2.a-f
Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the chief administrative officer failed to implement tuberculosis (TB) infection control activities including annually providing training and education related to recognizing the signs and symptoms of tuberculosis, for three of three sampled personnel members. The deficient practice posed a potential TB exposure risk to residents.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: July 7, 2025 - Personnel R9-10-806.A.10
Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a manager provided current documentation of first aid and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training certification specific to adults before providing assisted living services to a resident, for one of one applicable manager. The deficient practice posed a risk if a manager was unable to meet a resident's needs during an emergency.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: July 7, 2025 - Environmental Standards R9-10-819.A.10
Based on documentation review, observation, and interview, the manager failed to ensure oxygen containers were secured.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: September 2, 2025 - Environmental Standards R9-10-819.A.11
Based on documentation review, observation, and interview, the manager failed to ensure poisonous or toxic materials stored by the assisted living facility were maintained in a locked area inaccessible to residents. The deficient practice posed a risk to residents with access to the poisonous or toxic materials.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: July 7, 2025
January 29, 2024: complaint, compliance (annual) inspection, 11 deficiencies
- Health care institutions; cardiopulmonary resuscitation; first aid; immunity; falls; definition A.R.S. § 36-420.B.2
Based on record review and interview, the health care institution failed to provide appropriate first aid before the arrival of emergency medical services to a non-injured resident who had fallen, appeared to be uninjured, and was unable to reasonably recover independently.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: February 10, 2025 - Administration R9-10-803.A.9
Based on documentation review, interview, and record review, the governing authority failed to ensure compliance with Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) § 36-411, for one of four personnel members sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk if the personnel member was a danger to a vulnerable population.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: February 10, 2025 - Administration R9-10-803.C.1.j.i
Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure policies and procedures were implemented to protect the health and safety of a resident that cover termination of residency, including termination initiated by the manager of an assisted living facility.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: April 20, 2024 - Administration R9-10-803.C.1.m
Based on documentation review, observation, and interview, the manager failed to ensure policies and procedures were established, documented, and implemented to protect the health and safety of a resident to cover methods by which the assisted living facility was aware of the general or specific whereabouts of a resident, based on the level of assisted living services provided to the resident and the assisted living services the assisted living facility was authorized to provide. The deficient practice posed a risk if the facility was unaware of the whereabouts of a resident.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: February 17, 2025 - Personnel R9-10-806.A.5.a-c
Based on documentation review, record review and, interview, the manager failed to ensure an assisted living facility had caregivers with the qualifications, experience, skills, and knowledge necessary to provide the assisted living services and ancillary services in the assisted living facility's scope of services, meet the needs of a resident, and ensure the health and safety of a resident. The deficient practice posed a risk to the health and safety of a resident.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: February 17, 2025
Show all 9
- Personnel R9-10-806.A.10
Based on documentation review, interview, and record review, the manager failed to ensure a caregiver provided current documentation of first aid training and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training certification specific to adults before providing assisted living services to a resident, for two of four personnel members sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk if a caregiver was unable to meet a resident's needs during an emergency.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: April 20, 2024 - Residency and Residency Agreements R9-10-807.D.5
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure there was a documented residency agreement with the assisted living facility that included whether the manager or a caregiver would be awake during nighttime hours, for one of two residents sampled.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: January 20, 2025 - Directed Care Services R9-10-815.F.2.a.i-ii
Based on documentation review, observation, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a means of exiting the facility for a resident who did not have a key, special knowledge for egress, or the ability to expend increased physical effort controlled or alerted employees of the egress of a resident from the facility. The deficient practice posed a risk if the facility was unaware of the egress of a resident from the facility.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: April 20, 2024 - and 3 more in the report
Read the full record on AZ Care Check →
ADHS writes a Statement of Deficiencies after each inspection that finds a rule was not met. The community then files a plan of correction, which ADHS accepts or rejects. ADHS investigates complaints on site. A complaint inspection that ends with “No deficiencies were found” did not find a rule violation; deficiencies cited on a complaint inspection are listed with that inspection. AZ Care Check does not list complaints that did not lead to an on-site inspection. Enforcement cases are actions ADHS takes after an inspection, such as a civil money penalty, a provisional license or a license revocation, with their status. This community is licensed for 6 residents; larger communities are inspected and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Arizona Department of Health Services, Licensing Services, AZ Care Check, data as of October 15, 2026, showing all records on AZ Care Check (back to September 5, 2023). Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.
License and ownershipActive license
- License type
- Assisted Living Home-Directed
- License number
- AL11108H
- License status
- Active
- Licensed capacity
- 6
- County
- Mohave County
Source: Arizona state licensing records (agency listing), retrieved 2026-09-09. Licensing status is a matter of public record; it is not a quality rating.
Paying with Medicaid and other programsHow Medicaid pays for care in Arizona, and other programs
How Medicaid pays for care in Arizona
- Arizona Long Term Care System (ALTCS). Yes. Arizona's Medicaid long-term care program, ALTCS, is for people who need nursing facility level of care. Members do not have to live in a nursing home, and many live in an assisted living facility and get needed services there. (state page)
Ask the community whether it accepts Medicaid.
Location and nearby careNearest hospital 0.6 mi, nursing home 2.9 mi, pharmacy 1.0 mi
- Nearest hospital with an emergency room
- Havasu Regional Medical Center, Lake Havasu City. 0.6 miles away, straight line. CMS overall hospital rating: 3 of 5 stars.
- Nearest Medicare nursing home
- Haven of Lake Havasu, Lake Havasu City. 2.9 miles away, straight line.
- Nearest home health agency office
- River Valley Home Health, Lake Havasu. 0.4 miles away, straight line. Agencies travel to clients, so ask which ones serve this address.
- Nearest pharmacy
- Walgreens. 1.0 mile away, straight line. From OpenStreetMap, which does not list every pharmacy, so one may be closer.
- Area
- USDA classes ZIP code 86403 as metropolitan (metropolitan core).
- Dialysis within 15 miles
- 032544 Lake Havasu Dialysis (Fmc), Lake Havasu City, 0.4 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 4 of 5 stars)
- Hospice
- 13 Medicare hospices tell CMS they serve ZIP code 86403.
Acacia Hospice Care Of Lake Havasu Inc, office in Lake Havasu City, 0.4 miles away, straight line
Beacon Of Hope Hospice, office in Lake Havasu, 0.7 miles away, straight line
Hospice Of Havasu, Inc., office in Lake Havasu City, 1.3 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 5 of 5 stars) - Nearest geriatric medicine practice
- Peter Tran, DO, Henderson. 113.4 miles away, straight line. 1 geriatric medicine doctor listed there.
Distances are straight lines from the community, not driving distance. Hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors come from CMS provider data (CMS, hospital list updated Jul 22, 2026). Star ratings are CMS’s own.
Emergency and natural hazard riskFEMA overall risk very low; outside FEMA's high-risk flood areas
Public hazard maps for this location. Ask the community about its emergency plan, its generator and where residents would go in an evacuation.
- Flood zone
- Outside the high and moderate risk flood areas on FEMA's flood map (Zone X, minimal flood hazard, or not studied). (FEMA flood map)
- FEMA National Risk Index
- Overall: very low. By hazard: inland flooding relatively low, wildfire very low, tornado very low, heat wave relatively high, earthquake relatively low. These are FEMA’s ratings for the census tract, compared with tracts nationwide. (FEMA, December 2025)
A flood zone describes the map at this point, not the building's elevation. In an emergency, follow the local emergency management agency.
Questions to ask on a tour10 questions picked for this community from its record
Picked for this community from its record. Ask them in person and write down the answers.
- The state recorded a finding in April 2026. What was it, and how was it fixed?
- What does the base rate include, and when did rates last go up?
- Who is here at night? Are they awake, or asleep and on call?
- Who covers when the owner is sick, on vacation, or away for the day? Can we meet them?
- Is it one flat rate, or does it rise with care needs?
- Can you help someone who needs two people to move, or a mechanical lift?
- How many caregivers are on duty during the day and at night?
- What happens if care needs increase? When would someone need to move?
- What fees are charged at move-in?
- How do you tell families about falls, illness or changes?
What we checked11 public sources we searched, with dates
Every public source we searched for this community. “Nothing on record” means we found no record that matched it. A record can be missed when a name or address differs.
| Source | Data as of | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Arizona Department of Health Services, Licensing Services inspection records | Oct 15, 2026 | See above |
| U.S. Department of Labor wage and hour cases | Oct 15, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| OSHA workplace safety inspections since 2016 | Oct 15, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| FEMA flood map | See above | |
| USDA wildfire risk | Apr 15, 2026 | Not shown: FEMA rates wildfire risk here very low |
| FEMA National Risk Index | See above | |
| CMS hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors; OpenStreetMap pharmacies | See above | |
| HUD Multifamily Properties - Assisted | Jul 6, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| State Veterans Homes (NASVH directory) | Sep 20, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| CMS Hospice - General Information | Aug 19, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| CMS Home Health Care Agencies | May 27, 2026 | Nothing on record |
Common questionsAnswers to 4 questions families ask
What type of care does Gems Assisted Living provide?
Gems Assisted Living is licensed by the state of Arizona for assisted living in Lake Havasu City, Arizona. Its licensed capacity is 6 residents.
Does Lilisity rate Gems Assisted Living?
No. We publish state licensing details for Gems Assisted Living but no score, rating, or ranking. Only communities on the Top Communities list or with a Senior Living Alliance Excellence Award, both based on phone-verified resident and family interviews, are ranked.
How much does Gems Assisted Living cost?
Assisted Living in Arizona typically starts at $3,450 to $5,250 a month. Based on 88 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price. Gems Assisted Living does not publish its prices.
How do I contact Gems Assisted Living?
Visit Gems Assisted Living at 2136 Senita Drive, Lake Havasu City, AZ 86403.
How Lilisity works. The only scores or rankings Lilisity publishes are the Top Communities list and the Excellence Awards, both built from phone-verified resident and family interviews. Communities can pay Lilisity a flat monthly fee to manage their own listing: photos, prices, contact details, and receiving the inquiries families choose to send them. The fee is the same no matter how many families contact them or move in. Senior Living Alliance, which runs Lilisity, offers the same listing to its member communities as part of their membership; members pay SLA for its resident and family interview program. No community pays Lilisity per inquiry, per referral or per move-in. Payment never changes a testimonial, a rating, or the order of search results. The "Nearby Senior Living Alliance communities" box shows member communities only. How we verify testimonials · How we are paid