Lilisity

Assisted Living

Flowers Assisted Living Home 2

2601 Palo Verde North Blvd, Lake Havasu City, AZ 86404 · Map
Licensed for 6 residents

State license active
Is this your community? Claim this listing

Flowers Assisted Living Home 2 is a state-licensed assisted living community in Lake Havasu City, Arizona. It is licensed for 6 residents. Lilisity publishes no score or ranking for this community; the details below come from the state licensing record.

Assisted LivingCare offered
6 residentsLicensed capacity
State licensedAssisted living home-directed
$3,450 to $5,250/moTypical assisted living start in Arizona, from 88 communities that publish prices

Prices

This community does not publish its prices.

Area costs

Assisted Living in Arizona typically starts at $3,450 to $5,250 a month. Based on 88 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price.

Lilisity’s independent report

What the public record shows

Gathered by Lilisity from state and federal sources. Communities can’t edit this part of the page.

State inspections

26Deficiencies cited
2Complaint inspections

Last inspection: Apr 14, 2026. See the record

License

Active, 6 residents

Assisted Living Home-Directed AL12709H.

Nearest emergency room

2.7 miles

Havasu Regional Medical Center, rated 3 of 5 stars by CMS.

Side by side with nearby communities

The 4 nearest communities that offer assisted living, by straight-line distance. Prices are starting prices each community publishes; we never show estimates.

CommunityDistanceLicensed capacityPublished starting priceLicenseInspection citations
Flowers Assisted Living Home 2 this community6Not publishedActive26 deficiencies, 2 enforcement cases
Gems Assisted Living #40.3 mi10Not publishedActive34 deficiencies, 3 enforcement cases
Neighbors Assisted Living North1.0 mi16Not publishedActive7 deficiencies, 1 enforcement case
Lake House Assisted Living1.7 mi16Not publishedActive6 deficiencies, 1 enforcement case
Gems Assisted Living2.4 mi6Not publishedActive22 deficiencies, 2 enforcement cases
State inspection record26 deficiencies, 2 enforcement cases
Last inspection
April 14, 2026
Inspections
4, 26 deficiencies cited
Complaint inspections
2, 2 with deficiencies cited
Enforcement cases
2, $750 in civil penalties
  • License active since 2024

Enforcement cases

  • December 8, 2025: Civil Penalty $250 (complete); Notice of Enforcement (complete) case closed (complete)
  • August 6, 2024: Civil Penalty $500 (complete) case closed (complete)

April 14, 2026: complaint inspection, 19 deficiencies

  • Prohibited acts; required acts A.R.S. § 36-407.A
    Based on documentation review, observation, record review, and interview, the facility exceeded the licensed services as specified by the license issued by the Department. The deficient practice posed a risk if the facility was unable to meet a resident's needs.
    Approved
  • Emergency responders; patient information; hospitals; discharge planning; patient screenings; discharge document A.R.S. § 36-420.04.A.1-9
    Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the assisted living home that contacted an emergency responder on behalf of a resident failed to provide to the emergency responder a written document that included all of the information required in A.R.S. § 36-420.04.A.1-9, for one of one applicable residents reviewed. The deficient practice posed a risk if the emergency responder was not aware of critical health information for the resident or if the hospital was unable to make contact with the someone from the home twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week.
    Approved
  • Tuberculosis Screening R9-10-113.A.2.a-f
    Based on record review, documentation review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure that the assisted living home established, documented, and implemented tuberculosis (TB) infection control activities that included annually providing training and education related to recognizing the signs and symptoms of TB to individuals employed by the health care institution, for four of four personnel reviewed. The deficient practice posed a risk to the physical health and safety of the residents.
    Approved
  • Administration R9-10-803.A.8
    Based on observation, documentation review, and interview, the governing authority failed to ensure that a caregiver who was able to read, write, understand, and communicate in English was on the assisted living facility’s premises. The deficient practice posed a risk as residents and the Compliance Officer could not effectively communicate with the caregiver.
    Approved
  • Administration R9-10-803.A.9
    Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the governing authority failed to ensure compliance with A.R.S. § 36-411, for four of four personnel reviewed. The deficient practice posed a risk if the employees were a danger to a vulnerable population.
    Approved
Show all 9
  • Administration R9-10-803.A.10
    Based on observation and interview, the governing authority failed to ensure the health, safety, or welfare of a resident was not placed at risk of harm, for all nine residents. The deficient practice posed a risk to the health and safety of the other residents.
    Approved
  • Personnel R9-10-806.A.7
    Based on observation, documentation review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure that documentation was maintained of the caregivers working each day, including the hours worked by each. The deficient practice posed a risk as there was no documentation to identify the staff that was present each day to ensure the health and safety of residents.
    Approved
  • Personnel R9-10-806.A.8.a-b
    Based on record review, interview, and documentation review, the manager failed to ensure that a caregiver and the manager provided evidence of freedom from infectious tuberculosis (TB) on or before the date the individual began providing services at or on behalf of the assisted living facility, and as specified in R9-10-113, for four of four personnel records reviewed. The deficient practice posed a potential TB exposure risk to residents.
    Approved
  • and 11 more in the report

October 21, 2025: complaint, compliance (annual) inspection, 3 deficiencies

  • Health care institutions; fall prevention and fall recovery; training programs; definition A.R.S. § 36-420.01.A
    Based on record review and interview, the health care institution failed to ensure the health care institution developed and administered a training program for all staff regarding fall prevention and fall recovery that included initial training and continued competency training, for one of three employees sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk as the caregiver received no organized instruction or information related to physical health services provided to residents.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: October 21, 2025
  • Personnel R9-10-806.A.4.a-b
    Based on record review, documentation review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a caregiver's or assistant caregiver’s skills and knowledge were verified and documented before the caregiver or assistant caregiver provided physical health services, and according to policies and procedures for one of the three employees sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk if the employees were unable to meet residents’ needs.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: October 21, 2025
  • Personnel R9-10-806.A.8.a-b
    Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a caregiver provided evidence of freedom from infectious tuberculosis (TB) as specified in R9-10-113 for two of three personnel sampled. The deficient practice posed a potential illness risk to residents.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: October 21, 2025

May 9, 2024: initial monitoring inspection, 4 deficiencies

  • Personnel R9-10-806.A.7
    Based on documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure documentation was maintained of the caregivers and assistant caregivers working each day, including the hours worked by each. The deficient practice posed a risk if there was no documented schedule to ensure shifts and tasks were covered.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: May 9, 2024
  • Personnel R9-10-806.B.4.a-b
    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure at least one manager or caregiver was present at the home when a resident was on the premises. The deficient practice posed a risk as no qualified staff were present to ensure the health and safety of residents.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: May 9, 2024
  • Medical Records R9-10-811.C.1-24
    Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a resident's medical record contained all required documents in Arizona Administrative Code (A.A.C.) R9-10-811(C)(1)-(24).
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: May 9, 2024
  • R9-10-820.D.4.b.i-ii R9-10-820.D.4.b.i-ii
    Based on observation and interview, the administrator failed to ensure a resident bedroom was not used as a passageway to a common area, another sleeping area, or common bathroom unless written consent was obtained from the resident or the resident's representative. The deficient practice posed a risk of violating a resident's right to privacy.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: May 9, 2024

Inspections with no deficiencies listed

  • December 15, 2023: compliance (initial) inspection. No deficiencies were found during the on-site initial inspection conducted on December 15, 2023, and the off-site documentation review completed on December 21, 2023.

Read the full record on AZ Care Check →

ADHS writes a Statement of Deficiencies after each inspection that finds a rule was not met. The community then files a plan of correction, which ADHS accepts or rejects. ADHS investigates complaints on site. A complaint inspection that ends with “No deficiencies were found” did not find a rule violation; deficiencies cited on a complaint inspection are listed with that inspection. AZ Care Check does not list complaints that did not lead to an on-site inspection. Enforcement cases are actions ADHS takes after an inspection, such as a civil money penalty, a provisional license or a license revocation, with their status. This community is licensed for 6 residents; larger communities are inspected and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Arizona Department of Health Services, Licensing Services, AZ Care Check, data as of October 15, 2026, showing all records on AZ Care Check (back to September 5, 2023). Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.

License and ownershipActive license
License type
Assisted Living Home-Directed
License number
AL12709H
License status
Active
Licensed capacity
6

Source: Arizona state licensing records (agency listing), retrieved 2026-09-09. Licensing status is a matter of public record; it is not a quality rating.

Paying with Medicaid and other programsHow Medicaid pays for care in Arizona, and other programs

How Medicaid pays for care in Arizona

  • Arizona Long Term Care System (ALTCS). Yes. Arizona's Medicaid long-term care program, ALTCS, is for people who need nursing facility level of care. Members do not have to live in a nursing home, and many live in an assisted living facility and get needed services there. (state page)

Ask the community whether it accepts Medicaid.

Location and nearby careNearest hospital 2.7 mi, nursing home 4.1 mi, pharmacy 3.0 mi
Nearest hospital with an emergency room
Havasu Regional Medical Center, Lake Havasu City. 2.7 miles away, straight line. CMS overall hospital rating: 3 of 5 stars.
Nearest Medicare nursing home
Haven of Lake Havasu, Lake Havasu City. 4.1 miles away, straight line.
Nearest home health agency office
Foundation Home Health, LLC, Lake Havasu City. 2.8 miles away, straight line. Agencies travel to clients, so ask which ones serve this address.
Nearest pharmacy
CVS Pharmacy. 3.0 miles away, straight line. From OpenStreetMap, which does not list every pharmacy, so one may be closer.
Area
USDA classes ZIP code 86404 as metropolitan (metropolitan core).
Dialysis within 15 miles
032544 Lake Havasu Dialysis (Fmc), Lake Havasu City, 2.8 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 4 of 5 stars)
Hospice
10 Medicare hospices tell CMS they serve ZIP code 86404.
Acacia Hospice Care Of Lake Havasu Inc, office in Lake Havasu City, 2.7 miles away, straight line
Beacon Of Hope Hospice, office in Lake Havasu, 2.9 miles away, straight line
Hospice Of Havasu, Inc., office in Lake Havasu City, 3.0 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 5 of 5 stars)
Nearest geriatric medicine practice
Peter Tran, DO, Henderson. 111.1 miles away, straight line. 1 geriatric medicine doctor listed there.

Distances are straight lines from the community, not driving distance. Hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors come from CMS provider data (CMS, hospital list updated Jul 22, 2026). Star ratings are CMS’s own.

Emergency and natural hazard riskFEMA overall risk very low; outside FEMA's high-risk flood areas

Public hazard maps for this location. Ask the community about its emergency plan, its generator and where residents would go in an evacuation.

Flood zone
Outside the high and moderate risk flood areas on FEMA's flood map (Zone X, minimal flood hazard, or not studied). (FEMA flood map)
FEMA National Risk Index
Overall: very low. By hazard: inland flooding relatively low, wildfire very low, tornado very low, heat wave relatively high, earthquake very low. These are FEMA’s ratings for the census tract, compared with tracts nationwide. (FEMA, December 2025)

A flood zone describes the map at this point, not the building's elevation. In an emergency, follow the local emergency management agency.

Questions to ask on a tour10 questions picked for this community from its record

Picked for this community from its record. Ask them in person and write down the answers.

  1. The state recorded a finding in April 2026. What was it, and how was it fixed?
  2. What does the base rate include, and when did rates last go up?
  3. Who is here at night? Are they awake, or asleep and on call?
  4. Who covers when the owner is sick, on vacation, or away for the day? Can we meet them?
  5. Is it one flat rate, or does it rise with care needs?
  6. Can you help someone who needs two people to move, or a mechanical lift?
  7. How many caregivers are on duty during the day and at night?
  8. What happens if care needs increase? When would someone need to move?
  9. What fees are charged at move-in?
  10. How do you tell families about falls, illness or changes?
What we checked11 public sources we searched, with dates

Every public source we searched for this community. “Nothing on record” means we found no record that matched it. A record can be missed when a name or address differs.

SourceData as ofWhat we found
Arizona Department of Health Services, Licensing Services inspection recordsOct 15, 2026See above
U.S. Department of Labor wage and hour casesOct 15, 2026Nothing on record
OSHA workplace safety inspections since 2016Oct 15, 2026Nothing on record
FEMA flood mapSee above
USDA wildfire riskApr 15, 2026Not shown: FEMA rates wildfire risk here very low
FEMA National Risk IndexSee above
CMS hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors; OpenStreetMap pharmaciesSee above
HUD Multifamily Properties - AssistedJul 6, 2026Nothing on record
State Veterans Homes (NASVH directory)Sep 20, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Hospice - General InformationAug 19, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Home Health Care AgenciesMay 27, 2026Nothing on record
Common questionsAnswers to 4 questions families ask
What type of care does Flowers Assisted Living Home 2 provide?

Flowers Assisted Living Home 2 is licensed by the state of Arizona for assisted living in Lake Havasu City, Arizona. Its licensed capacity is 6 residents.

Does Lilisity rate Flowers Assisted Living Home 2?

No. We publish state licensing details for Flowers Assisted Living Home 2 but no score, rating, or ranking. Only communities on the Top Communities list or with a Senior Living Alliance Excellence Award, both based on phone-verified resident and family interviews, are ranked.

How much does Flowers Assisted Living Home 2 cost?

Assisted Living in Arizona typically starts at $3,450 to $5,250 a month. Based on 88 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price. Flowers Assisted Living Home 2 does not publish its prices.

How do I contact Flowers Assisted Living Home 2?

Visit Flowers Assisted Living Home 2 at 2601 Palo Verde North Blvd, Lake Havasu City, AZ 86404.

Choosing a small care homeOur care guide: what to look for, what it costs, how families pay, and more questions to ask (PDF)

Report a wrong fact

How Lilisity works. The only scores or rankings Lilisity publishes are the Top Communities list and the Excellence Awards, both built from phone-verified resident and family interviews. Communities can pay Lilisity a flat monthly fee to manage their own listing: photos, prices, contact details, and receiving the inquiries families choose to send them. The fee is the same no matter how many families contact them or move in. Senior Living Alliance, which runs Lilisity, offers the same listing to its member communities as part of their membership; members pay SLA for its resident and family interview program. No community pays Lilisity per inquiry, per referral or per move-in. Payment never changes a testimonial, a rating, or the order of search results. The "Nearby Senior Living Alliance communities" box shows member communities only. How we verify testimonials · How we are paid