Assisted Living
Gems Assisted Living #4
1502 Avalon Avenue, Unit A & B, Lake Havasu City, AZ 86404 · Map
Licensed for 10 residents
Gems Assisted Living #4 is a state-licensed assisted living community in Lake Havasu City, Arizona. It is licensed for 10 residents. Lilisity publishes no score or ranking for this community; the details below come from the state licensing record.
Prices
This community does not publish its prices.
Area costs
Lilisity’s independent report
What the public record shows
Gathered by Lilisity from state and federal sources. Communities can’t edit this part of the page.
State inspections
Last inspection: Jul 16, 2026. See the record
License
Active, 10 residents
Assisted Living Home-Directed AL11387H.
Nearest emergency room
2.7 miles
Havasu Regional Medical Center, rated 3 of 5 stars by CMS.
Side by side with nearby communities
The 4 nearest communities that offer assisted living, by straight-line distance. Prices are starting prices each community publishes; we never show estimates.
| Community | Distance | Licensed capacity | Published starting price | License | Inspection citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gems Assisted Living #4 this community | 10 | Not published | Active | 34 deficiencies, 3 enforcement cases | |
| Flowers Assisted Living Home 2 | 0.3 mi | 6 | Not published | Active | 26 deficiencies, 2 enforcement cases |
| Neighbors Assisted Living North | 1.3 mi | 16 | Not published | Active | 7 deficiencies, 1 enforcement case |
| Lake House Assisted Living | 1.7 mi | 16 | Not published | Active | 6 deficiencies, 1 enforcement case |
| Lake View Terrace Memory Care Residence | 2.5 mi | 72 | Not published | Active | 43 deficiencies, 6 enforcement cases |
State inspection record34 deficiencies, 3 enforcement cases
- Last inspection
- July 16, 2026
- Inspections
- 5, 34 deficiencies cited
- Complaint inspections
- 5, 5 with deficiencies cited
- Enforcement cases
- 3, $7,000 in civil penalties
- License active since 2020
Enforcement cases
- July 16, 2026: Civil Penalty $500 (complete); Notice of Enforcement Action (complete) case closed (complete)
- June 23, 2025: Civil Penalty $5,750 (complete) case closed (complete)
- July 3, 2024: Civil Penalty $750 (complete) case closed (complete)
July 16, 2026: complaint inspection, 6 deficiencies
- Administration R9-10-803.J.1-6
Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, after the manager had a reasonable basis, according to A.R.S. § 46-454, to believe abuse, neglect, or exploitation had occurred on the premises, the manager failed to document the report and the investigation as required per R9-10-803(J). The deficient practice posed a risk as the Department was unable to assess if there was an immediate health and safety concern for residents who resided in the assisted living facility.
Approved - Service Plans R9-10-808.C.1.g
Based on record review, documentation review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a caregiver documented the services provided in the resident’s medical record, for two of two residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk if the residents’ needs were not being met.
Approved - Medical Records R9-10-811.C.12
Based on record review, documentation review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a resident’s medical record contained a medication order from a medical practitioner for each medication that was administered to the resident. The deficient practice posed a health and safety risk if a resident received medication and the Department was unable to verify the order.
Approved - Medical Records R9-10-811.C.13.b
Based on record review, documentation review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a resident's medical record contained documentation of medication administered to a resident that included the strength, dosage, and route of administration, for one of two residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk if the resident experienced a change in condition due to improper medication administration.
Approved - Medication Services R9-10-817.B.3.b
Based on record review, documentation review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure that medication administered to a resident was administered in compliance with a medication order, for one of two residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk if the resident experienced a change in condition due to improper medication administration.
Approved - Emergency and Safety Standards R9-10-819.D.2.a-f
Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure that when a resident had an accident, emergency, or injury that resulted in the resident needing medical services, a caregiver or assistant caregiver documented the following: the date and time of the accident, emergency, or injury; a description of the accident, emergency, or injury; the names of individuals who observed the accident, emergency, or injury; the actions taken by the caregiver or assistant caregiver; the individuals notified by the caregiver or assistant caregiver; and any action taken to ...
Approved
April 28, 2026: complaint, compliance (annual) inspection, 9 deficiencies
- Emergency responders; patient information; hospitals; discharge planning; patient screenings; discharge document A.R.S. § 36-420.04.C
Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the assisted living home failed to maintain a standardized form for each resident that included the information prescribed in subsection A of this section, for two of two residents sampled.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: August 3, 2026 - Residency and Residency Agreements R9-10-807.A.1-2
Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a resident provided evidence of freedom from infectious tuberculosis (TB) as specified in Arizona Administrative Code (A.A.C.) R9-10-113, for two of two sampled residents. The deficient practice posed a potential TB exposure risk to residents.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: August 3, 2026 - Residency and Residency Agreements R9-10-807.B.1.a-b
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a resident accepted by the assisted living facility submitted documentation signed by a medical practitioner or a registered nurse that stated whether the individual required continuous medical services, continuous or intermittent nursing services, or restraints, for one of two residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk if the facility was unable to meet a resident's needs.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: August 3, 2026 - Residency and Residency Agreements R9-10-807.D.4
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure there was a documented residency agreement with the assisted living facility that included a list of the services available from the assisted living facility at an additional fee or charge, for two of two sampled residents.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: August 3, 2026 - Service Plans R9-10-808.A.5.b
Based on record review, documentation review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a resident had a service plan that was established, documented, and implemented that when initially developed and when updated, was signed and dated by the manager, for two of two residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk if the service plan was not developed to articulate decisions and agreements.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: August 3, 2026
Show all 9
- Service Plans R9-10-808.C.1.g
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a caregiver documented the services provided in the resident’s medical record, for two of two residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk if a resident did not receive needed services.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: August 3, 2026 - Directed Care Services R9-10-815.B.1
Based on documentation review, record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure the facility did not accept or retain a resident who was confined to a bed or chair because of an inability to ambulate even with assistance, except as provided in R9-10-814(B)(2), for one of two residents reviewed who were confined to a bed or chair. The deficient practice posed a risk if the facility was unable to meet a resident's needs.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: August 3, 2026 - Directed Care Services R9-10-815.C.6.a-b
Based on record review, documentation review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a service plan of a resident receiving directed care services included documentation of the resident's weight or documentation from a medical practitioner that stated weighing the resident was contraindicated, for one of two residents reviewed. The deficient practice posed a health and safety risk to the residents.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: August 3, 2026 - and 1 more in the report
April 9, 2025: complaint, compliance (annual) inspection, 12 deficiencies
- Health care institutions; fall prevention and fall recovery; training programs; definition A.R.S. § 36-420.01.A
Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the governing authority failed to administer a training program for all staff regarding fall prevention and fall recovery. The deficient practice posed a risk if a staff member was not properly trained to assist a resident who had fallen and was unable to recover independently and the Department was provided false or misleading information.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: July 7, 2025 - Tuberculosis Screening R9-10-113.A.2.a-f
Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the chief administrative officer failed to implement tuberculosis (TB) infection control activities including annually providing training and education related to recognizing the signs and symptoms of tuberculosis, for six of nine sampled personnel members. The deficient practice posed a potential TB exposure risk to residents.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: October 24, 2025 - Administration R9-10-803.A.9
Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the governing authority failed to ensure compliance with Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) § 36-411(A) and (C), for five of nine sampled personnel members. The deficient practice posed a risk if the employees were a danger to a vulnerable population.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: November 4, 2025 - Personnel R9-10-806.A.10
Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a manager or a caregiver provided current documentation of first aid and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training certification specific to adults before providing assisted living services to a resident, for two of nine applicable sampled personnel members. The deficient practice posed a risk if a manager or a caregiver was unable to meet a resident's needs during an emergency.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: October 28, 2025 - Personnel R9-10-806.A.4.a-b
Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a caregiver's skills and knowledge were verified and documented before the caregiver provided physical health services, for one of four sampled caregivers. The deficient practice posed a risk if a caregiver did not have the skills and knowledge necessary to meet a resident's needs and the Department was provided false or misleading information.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: October 28, 2025
Show all 9
- Personnel R9-10-806.A.8.a-b
Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a caregiver provided evidence of freedom from infectious tuberculosis (TB) on or before the date the caregiver began providing services at or on behalf of the assisted living facility as specified in Arizona Administrative Code (A.A.C.) R9-10-113, for one of four sampled caregivers. The deficient practice posed a potential TB exposure risk to residents.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: October 28, 2025 - Residency and Residency Agreements R9-10-807.A.1-2
Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a resident provided evidence of freedom from infectious tuberculosis (TB) as specified in Arizona Administrative Code (A.A.C.) R9-10-113, for two of two sampled residents. The deficient practice posed a potential TB exposure risk to residents.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: November 11, 2025 - Residency and Residency Agreements R9-10-807.D.2.a-c
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure there was a documented residency agreement with the assisted living facility that included terms of occupancy, including the date of occupancy or expected date of occupancy, for one of two sampled residents.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: October 24, 2025 - and 4 more in the report
April 8, 2024: complaint inspection, 5 deficiencies
- Personnel R9-10-806.A.4.a-b
Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a caregiver's or assistant caregiver's skills and knowledge were verified and documented before the caregiver or assistant caregiver provided physical health services and according to policies and procedures, for three of five sampled caregivers or assistant caregivers. The deficient practice posed a risk if a caregiver or assistant caregiver did not have the skills and knowledge necessary to meet a resident's needs.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: April 15, 2024 - Directed Care Services R9-10-815.F.2.a.i-ii
Based on observation and interview, the manager failed to ensure a means of exiting the facility for a resident who did not have a key, special knowledge for egress, or the ability to expend increased physical effort controlled or alerted employees of the egress of a resident from the facility. The deficient practice posed a risk if the facility was unaware of the egress of a resident from the facility.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: April 15, 2024 - R9-10-816.A.1.e R9-10-816.A.1.e
Based on documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure policies and procedures for medication services included procedures for assisting a resident in procuring medication. The deficient practice posed a risk if required medication was not available for a resident.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: April 15, 2024 - R9-10-816.B.3.b R9-10-816.B.3.b
Based on record review, interview, and documentation review, the manager failed to ensure medication administered to a resident was administered in compliance with a medication order, for two of three sampled residents. The deficient practice posed a risk if a resident experienced a change in condition due to improper administration of medication.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: April 20, 2024 - R9-10-816.F.3.a R9-10-816.F.3.a
Based on documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure policies and procedures were established, documented, and implemented to cover receiving, storing, inventorying, tracking, and dispensing medication.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: April 15, 2024
Read the full record on AZ Care Check →
ADHS writes a Statement of Deficiencies after each inspection that finds a rule was not met. The community then files a plan of correction, which ADHS accepts or rejects. ADHS investigates complaints on site. A complaint inspection that ends with “No deficiencies were found” did not find a rule violation; deficiencies cited on a complaint inspection are listed with that inspection. AZ Care Check does not list complaints that did not lead to an on-site inspection. Enforcement cases are actions ADHS takes after an inspection, such as a civil money penalty, a provisional license or a license revocation, with their status. This community is licensed for 10 residents; larger communities are inspected and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Arizona Department of Health Services, Licensing Services, AZ Care Check, data as of October 15, 2026, showing all records on AZ Care Check (back to September 5, 2023). Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.
License and ownershipActive license
- License type
- Assisted Living Home-Directed
- License number
- AL11387H
- License status
- Active
- Licensed capacity
- 10
- County
- Mohave County
Source: Arizona state licensing records (agency listing), retrieved 2026-09-09. Licensing status is a matter of public record; it is not a quality rating.
Paying with Medicaid and other programsHow Medicaid pays for care in Arizona, and other programs
How Medicaid pays for care in Arizona
- Arizona Long Term Care System (ALTCS). Yes. Arizona's Medicaid long-term care program, ALTCS, is for people who need nursing facility level of care. Members do not have to live in a nursing home, and many live in an assisted living facility and get needed services there. (state page)
Ask the community whether it accepts Medicaid.
Location and nearby careNearest hospital 2.7 mi, nursing home 4.4 mi, pharmacy 3.1 mi
- Nearest hospital with an emergency room
- Havasu Regional Medical Center, Lake Havasu City. 2.7 miles away, straight line. CMS overall hospital rating: 3 of 5 stars.
- Nearest Medicare nursing home
- Haven of Lake Havasu, Lake Havasu City. 4.4 miles away, straight line.
- Nearest home health agency office
- Foundation Home Health, LLC, Lake Havasu City. 2.9 miles away, straight line. Agencies travel to clients, so ask which ones serve this address.
- Nearest pharmacy
- CVS Pharmacy. 3.1 miles away, straight line. From OpenStreetMap, which does not list every pharmacy, so one may be closer.
- Area
- USDA classes ZIP code 86404 as metropolitan (metropolitan core).
- Dialysis within 15 miles
- 032544 Lake Havasu Dialysis (Fmc), Lake Havasu City, 3.0 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 4 of 5 stars)
- Hospice
- 10 Medicare hospices tell CMS they serve ZIP code 86404.
Acacia Hospice Care Of Lake Havasu Inc, office in Lake Havasu City, 2.8 miles away, straight line
Beacon Of Hope Hospice, office in Lake Havasu, 2.9 miles away, straight line
Hospice Of Havasu, Inc., office in Lake Havasu City, 3.0 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 5 of 5 stars) - Nearest geriatric medicine practice
- Peter Tran, DO, Henderson. 110.9 miles away, straight line. 1 geriatric medicine doctor listed there.
Distances are straight lines from the community, not driving distance. Hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors come from CMS provider data (CMS, hospital list updated Jul 22, 2026). Star ratings are CMS’s own.
Emergency and natural hazard riskFEMA overall risk very low; outside FEMA's high-risk flood areas
Public hazard maps for this location. Ask the community about its emergency plan, its generator and where residents would go in an evacuation.
- Flood zone
- Outside the high and moderate risk flood areas on FEMA's flood map (Zone X, minimal flood hazard, or not studied). (FEMA flood map)
- FEMA National Risk Index
- Overall: very low. By hazard: inland flooding relatively low, wildfire very low, tornado very low, heat wave relatively high, earthquake very low. These are FEMA’s ratings for the census tract, compared with tracts nationwide. (FEMA, December 2025)
A flood zone describes the map at this point, not the building's elevation. In an emergency, follow the local emergency management agency.
Questions to ask on a tour10 questions picked for this community from its record
Picked for this community from its record. Ask them in person and write down the answers.
- The state recorded a finding in July 2026. What was it, and how was it fixed?
- What does the base rate include, and when did rates last go up?
- How many caregivers are on duty during the day and at night?
- What happens if care needs increase? When would someone need to move?
- What fees are charged at move-in?
- How do you tell families about falls, illness or changes?
- How long have the executive director and the head of care been here?
- Who gives medications, and what training do they have?
- For what reasons can a resident be asked to leave?
- Is the apartment held during a hospital stay, and at what cost?
What we checked11 public sources we searched, with dates
Every public source we searched for this community. “Nothing on record” means we found no record that matched it. A record can be missed when a name or address differs.
| Source | Data as of | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Arizona Department of Health Services, Licensing Services inspection records | Oct 15, 2026 | See above |
| U.S. Department of Labor wage and hour cases | Oct 15, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| OSHA workplace safety inspections since 2016 | Oct 15, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| FEMA flood map | See above | |
| USDA wildfire risk | Apr 15, 2026 | Not shown: FEMA rates wildfire risk here very low |
| FEMA National Risk Index | See above | |
| CMS hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors; OpenStreetMap pharmacies | See above | |
| HUD Multifamily Properties - Assisted | Jul 6, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| State Veterans Homes (NASVH directory) | Sep 20, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| CMS Hospice - General Information | Aug 19, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| CMS Home Health Care Agencies | May 27, 2026 | Nothing on record |
Common questionsAnswers to 4 questions families ask
What type of care does Gems Assisted Living #4 provide?
Gems Assisted Living #4 is licensed by the state of Arizona for assisted living in Lake Havasu City, Arizona. Its licensed capacity is 10 residents.
Does Lilisity rate Gems Assisted Living #4?
No. We publish state licensing details for Gems Assisted Living #4 but no score, rating, or ranking. Only communities on the Top Communities list or with a Senior Living Alliance Excellence Award, both based on phone-verified resident and family interviews, are ranked.
How much does Gems Assisted Living #4 cost?
Assisted Living in Arizona typically starts at $3,450 to $5,250 a month. Based on 88 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price. Gems Assisted Living #4 does not publish its prices.
How do I contact Gems Assisted Living #4?
Visit Gems Assisted Living #4 at 1502 Avalon Avenue, Unit A & B, Lake Havasu City, AZ 86404.
How Lilisity works. The only scores or rankings Lilisity publishes are the Top Communities list and the Excellence Awards, both built from phone-verified resident and family interviews. Communities can pay Lilisity a flat monthly fee to manage their own listing: photos, prices, contact details, and receiving the inquiries families choose to send them. The fee is the same no matter how many families contact them or move in. Senior Living Alliance, which runs Lilisity, offers the same listing to its member communities as part of their membership; members pay SLA for its resident and family interview program. No community pays Lilisity per inquiry, per referral or per move-in. Payment never changes a testimonial, a rating, or the order of search results. The "Nearby Senior Living Alliance communities" box shows member communities only. How we verify testimonials · How we are paid