Lilisity

Assisted Living

Granite Gate Senior Living

3850 North Highway 89, Prescott, AZ 86301 · Map
Licensed for 124 residents

State license active
Is this your community? Claim this listing

Granite Gate Senior Living is a state-licensed assisted living community in Prescott, Arizona. It is licensed for 124 residents. Lilisity publishes no score or ranking for this community; the details below come from the state licensing record.

Assisted LivingCare offered
124 residentsLicensed capacity
State licensedAssisted living center-directed
$3,450 to $5,250/moTypical assisted living start in Arizona, from 88 communities that publish prices

Prices

This community does not publish its prices.

Area costs

Assisted Living in Arizona typically starts at $3,450 to $5,250 a month. Based on 88 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price.

Lilisity’s independent report

What the public record shows

Gathered by Lilisity from state and federal sources. Communities can’t edit this part of the page.

State inspections

32Deficiencies cited
15Complaint inspections

Last inspection: Aug 4, 2026. See the record

License

Active, 124 residents

Assisted Living Center-Directed AL10558C.

Nearest emergency room

4.2 miles

Exceptional Community Hospital Prescott.

Side by side with nearby communities

The 4 nearest communities that offer assisted living, by straight-line distance. Prices are starting prices each community publishes; we never show estimates.

CommunityDistanceLicensed capacityPublished starting priceLicenseInspection citations
Granite Gate Senior Living this community124Not publishedActive32 deficiencies, 7 enforcement cases
Highgate Senior Living of Prescott Lakes1.7 mi97Not publishedActive6 deficiencies, 2 enforcement cases
Willow Creek Assisted Living1.8 mi10Not publishedActive4 deficiencies, 1 enforcement case
Willow Wind Assisted Living2.3 mi62Not publishedActive9 deficiencies, 1 enforcement case
Circle of Life Alzheimer Homes, Symphony Drive2.4 mi5Not publishedActiveNo record
State inspection record32 deficiencies, 7 enforcement cases
Last inspection
August 4, 2026
Inspections
16, 32 deficiencies cited
Complaint inspections
15, 7 with deficiencies cited
Enforcement cases
7, $5,750 in civil penalties
  • License active since 2018

Enforcement cases

  • August 3, 2026: Civil Penalty $250 (complete); Notice of Enforcement Action (complete) case closed (complete)
  • May 20, 2026: Civil Penalty $750 (complete); Notice of Enforcement Action (complete) case closed (complete)
  • February 9, 2026: Civil Penalty $2,750 (complete); Notice of Enforcement (complete) case closed (complete)
  • January 21, 2026: Civil Penalty $1,250 (complete); Notice of Enforcement (complete) case closed (complete)
  • February 10, 2025: Civil Penalty (complete) case closed (complete)

April 9, 2026: complaint inspection, 3 deficiencies

  • Health care institutions; cardiopulmonary resuscitation; first aid; immunity; falls; definition A.R.S. § 36-420.B.2
    Based on documentation review and interview, the health care institution failed to provide appropriate first aid before the arrival of emergency medical services (EMS) to a non-injured resident who had fallen, appeared to be uninjured, and was unable to reasonably recover independently. The deficient practice posed a risk as a caregiver was unable to meet a resident's needs.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: April 27, 2026
  • Emergency and Safety Standards R9-10-819.D.1
    Based on documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a caregiver or an assistant caregiver immediately notified the resident's emergency contact and primary care provider (PCP) when a resident had an accident, emergency, or injury that resulted in the resident needing medical services, for two of six sampled residents. The deficient practice posed a potential risk of re-injury if a resident did not receive adequate follow-up care.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: April 29, 2026
  • Environmental Standards R9-10-820.A.1.b
    Based on observation and interview, the manager failed to ensure the premises was free from a condition or situation that may have caused a resident or other individual to suffer physical injury. The deficient practice posed a risk to the health and safety of a resident.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: May 29, 2026

March 9, 2026: complaint inspection, 3 deficiencies

  • Service Plans R9-10-808.C.1.a
    Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a caregiver or an assistant caregiver provided a resident with the assisted living services in the resident's service plan, for one of three sampled residents. The deficient practice posed a risk as services were not provided per a resident's service plan.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: August 12, 2026
  • Service Plans R9-10-808.C.1.g
    Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a caregiver or assistant caregiver documented the services provided in the resident's medical record, for one of three residents sampled.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: August 11, 2026
  • Medication Services R9-10-817.B.3.b
    Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure that medication administered to a resident was administered in compliance with a medication order for one of three residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk if the resident experienced a change in condition due to improper administration of medication.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: April 29, 2026

December 1, 2025: complaint, compliance (annual) inspection, 12 deficiencies

  • Opioid Prescribing and Treatment R9-10-120.F.4.a-c
    Based on observation, record review, documentation review and interview, for two of two residents sampled, who received opioid medication, without an active malignancy or an end of life condition, the manager failed to ensure an individual authorized to administer opioids documented in the resident's medical record; an identification of the resident's need for the opioid before the opioid was administered, and the monitoring of the effect of the opioid administered.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: February 19, 2026
  • Personnel R9-10-806.A.4.a-b
    Based on the record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a caregiver's skills and knowledge were verified and documented before the caregiver provided physical health services for three of nine caregivers sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk if the employees did not have the skills and knowledge required to ensure the health and safety of residents.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: January 14, 2026
  • Personnel R9-10-806.A.9
    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a caregiver received orientation that was specific to the duties to be performed before providing assisted living services to a resident, for three of nine caregivers. The deficient practice posed a risk if the employees were unable to meet residents' needs.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: January 14, 2026
  • Residency and Residency Agreements R9-10-807.B.1.a-b
    Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a resident accepted by the assisted living facility submitted documentation signed by a medical practitioner or a registered nurse that stated whether the individual required continuous medical services, continuous or intermittent nursing services, or restraints for one of eight residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk if the facility was unable to meet a resident's needs.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: February 28, 2026
  • Residency and Residency Agreements R9-10-807.D.10
    Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure before or at the time of an individual's acceptance by the assisted living facility, there was a documented residency agreement with the assisted living facility, which included the manager's signature and date signed, for one of eight residents sampled.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: January 15, 2026
Show all 9
  • Service Plans R9-10-808.A.3.c
    Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a resident's written service plan included the amount, type, and frequency of assisted living services being provided to the resident, for one of eight residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk as the service plans did not reinforce and clarify services to be provided to a resident.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: January 14, 2026
  • Resident Rights R9-10-810.B.1
    Based on observation, documentation, and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a resident was treated with dignity, respect, and consideration. The deficient practice violated a resident's rights.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: March 13, 2026
  • Personal Care Services R9-10-814.B.1-2
    Based on interview and record review, the manager failed to ensure the facility did not accept or retain a resident who was confined to a bed or chair because of an inability to ambulate even with assistance, unless the facility obtained a written determination from a medical practitioner, that stated the resident's needs could be met by the facility and the resident's needs were within the facility's scope of services, for one of one residents reviewed who were confined to a bed or chair. The deficient practice posed a risk if the facility was unable to meet a resident's needs.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: January 2, 2026
  • and 4 more in the report

November 6, 2025: complaint inspection, 2 deficiencies

  • Personnel R9-10-806.A.4.a-b
    Based on the observation, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a caregiver's skills and knowledge were verified and documented before the caregiver provided physical health services for two of two caregivers sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk if the employees did not have the skills and knowledge required to ensure the health and safety of residents.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: January 14, 2026
  • Medical Records R9-10-811.C.1-24
    Based on documentation, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a medical record was maintained at the facility for three of four sampled residents, which posed a health and safety risk for lack of information provided to caregivers.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: February 28, 2026

Other inspection reports

  • August 4, 2026: modification inspection. On August 4, 2026, an off-site modification inspection was conducted. Read the Statement of Deficiencies on AZ Care Check.

Inspections with no deficiencies listed

  • April 27, 2026: complaint inspection. No deficiencies were found during the on-site investigation of complaint 00167072 conducted on April 27, 2026.
  • April 14, 2025: complaint inspection. No deficiencies were found during the on-site investigation of complaints 00126197 and 00126182 conducted on March 14, 2025.
  • April 9, 2025: complaint inspection. No deficiencies were found during the on-site investigation of complaint #00126182 and #00126197 conducted on April 9, 2025.
  • March 12, 2025: complaint inspection. No deficiencies were found during the on-site investigation of complaint 00120786 conducted on March 12, 2025.
  • February 13, 2025: complaint inspection. AMENDED No deficiencies were found during the on-site investigation of complaint 00108937 conducted on February 13, 2025.
  • November 19, 2024: complaint inspection. An on-site complaint investigation of AZ00217879 and AZ00218439 was conducted on November 19, 2024, and no deficiencies were cited.

Read the full record on AZ Care Check →

ADHS writes a Statement of Deficiencies after each inspection that finds a rule was not met. The community then files a plan of correction, which ADHS accepts or rejects. ADHS investigates complaints on site. A complaint inspection that ends with “No deficiencies were found” did not find a rule violation; deficiencies cited on a complaint inspection are listed with that inspection. AZ Care Check does not list complaints that did not lead to an on-site inspection. Enforcement cases are actions ADHS takes after an inspection, such as a civil money penalty, a provisional license or a license revocation, with their status. This community is licensed for 124 residents; larger communities are inspected and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Arizona Department of Health Services, Licensing Services, AZ Care Check, data as of October 15, 2026, showing all records on AZ Care Check (back to September 5, 2023). Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.

License and ownershipActive license
License type
Assisted Living Center-Directed
License number
AL10558C
License status
Active
Licensed capacity
124

Source: Arizona state licensing records (agency listing), retrieved 2026-09-09. Licensing status is a matter of public record; it is not a quality rating.

Paying with Medicaid and other programsHow Medicaid pays for care in Arizona, and other programs

How Medicaid pays for care in Arizona

  • Arizona Long Term Care System (ALTCS). Yes. Arizona's Medicaid long-term care program, ALTCS, is for people who need nursing facility level of care. Members do not have to live in a nursing home, and many live in an assisted living facility and get needed services there. (state page)

Ask the community whether it accepts Medicaid.

Location and nearby careNearest hospital 4.2 mi, nursing home 2.2 mi, pharmacy 2.0 mi
Nearest hospital with an emergency room
Exceptional Community Hospital Prescott, Prescott. 4.2 miles away, straight line.
Nearest Medicare nursing home
Mountain View Manor, Prescott. 2.2 miles away, straight line.
Nearest home health agency office
Centerwell Home Health, Prescott. 2.6 miles away, straight line. Agencies travel to clients, so ask which ones serve this address.
Nearest pharmacy
CVS Pharmacy. 2.0 miles away, straight line. From OpenStreetMap, which does not list every pharmacy, so one may be closer.
Area
USDA classes ZIP code 86301 as metropolitan (metropolitan core).
Dialysis within 15 miles
Davita Prescott Dialysis, Prescott, 4.7 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 3 of 5 stars)
Fresenius Kidney Care Prescott Valley East, Prescott Valley, 5.5 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 3 of 5 stars)
Hospice
14 Medicare hospices tell CMS they serve ZIP code 86301.
Arizona Life Hospice - Yavapai, office in Prescott, 2.7 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 3 of 5 stars)
Alaga Hospice LLC, office in Prescott, 4.1 miles away, straight line
Good Samaritan Society Prescott Hospice, office in Prescott, 4.3 miles away, straight line
Nearest geriatric medicine practice
Neighborhood Outreach Access To Health, Phoenix. 66.9 miles away, straight line. 1 geriatric medicine doctor listed there.

Distances are straight lines from the community, not driving distance. Hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors come from CMS provider data (CMS, hospital list updated Jul 22, 2026). Star ratings are CMS’s own.

Emergency and natural hazard riskFEMA overall risk relatively low; outside FEMA's high-risk flood areas

Public hazard maps for this location. Ask the community about its emergency plan, its generator and where residents would go in an evacuation.

Flood zone
Outside the high and moderate risk flood areas on FEMA's flood map (Zone X, minimal flood hazard, or not studied). (FEMA flood map)
Wildfire risk to homes
In Prescott, AZ, risk to homes is greater than 77% of communities in Arizona and 96% of communities nationwide. USDA rates the whole town or city, not this address. (USDA Forest Service, Wildfire Risk to Communities, April 2026)
FEMA National Risk Index
Overall: relatively low. By hazard: inland flooding relatively moderate, wildfire relatively high, tornado very low, heat wave very low, earthquake relatively low. These are FEMA’s ratings for the census tract, compared with tracts nationwide. (FEMA, December 2025)

A flood zone describes the map at this point, not the building's elevation. In an emergency, follow the local emergency management agency.

Questions to ask on a tour10 questions picked for this community from its record

Picked for this community from its record. Ask them in person and write down the answers.

  1. The state recorded a finding in April 2026. What was it, and how was it fixed?
  2. What does the base rate include, and when did rates last go up?
  3. How many caregivers are on duty during the day and at night?
  4. What happens if care needs increase? When would someone need to move?
  5. What fees are charged at move-in?
  6. How do you tell families about falls, illness or changes?
  7. How long have the executive director and the head of care been here?
  8. Who gives medications, and what training do they have?
  9. For what reasons can a resident be asked to leave?
  10. Is the apartment held during a hospital stay, and at what cost?
What we checked12 public sources we searched, with dates

Every public source we searched for this community. “Nothing on record” means we found no record that matched it. A record can be missed when a name or address differs.

SourceData as ofWhat we found
Arizona Department of Health Services, Licensing Services inspection recordsOct 15, 2026See above
U.S. Department of Labor wage and hour casesOct 15, 2026Nothing on record
OSHA workplace safety inspections since 2016Oct 15, 2026Nothing on record
FEMA flood mapSee above
USDA wildfire riskApr 15, 2026See above
FEMA National Risk IndexSee above
CMS hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors; OpenStreetMap pharmaciesSee above
HUD Multifamily Properties - AssistedJul 6, 2026Nothing on record
State Veterans Homes (NASVH directory)Sep 20, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Hospice - General InformationAug 19, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Home Health Care AgenciesMay 27, 2026Nothing on record
The community’s own websiteCould not read the site
Common questionsAnswers to 4 questions families ask
What type of care does Granite Gate Senior Living provide?

Granite Gate Senior Living is licensed by the state of Arizona for assisted living in Prescott, Arizona. Its licensed capacity is 124 residents.

Does Lilisity rate Granite Gate Senior Living?

No. We publish state licensing details for Granite Gate Senior Living but no score, rating, or ranking. Only communities on the Top Communities list or with a Senior Living Alliance Excellence Award, both based on phone-verified resident and family interviews, are ranked.

How much does Granite Gate Senior Living cost?

Assisted Living in Arizona typically starts at $3,450 to $5,250 a month. Based on 88 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price. Granite Gate Senior Living does not publish its prices.

How do I contact Granite Gate Senior Living?

Use Granite Gate Senior Living's website, stellarliving.com/communities/granite-gate-senior-assisted-living-prescott-az, or visit at 3850 North Highway 89, Prescott, AZ 86301.

Choosing assisted livingOur care guide: what to look for, what it costs, how families pay, and more questions to ask (PDF)

Report a wrong fact

How Lilisity works. The only scores or rankings Lilisity publishes are the Top Communities list and the Excellence Awards, both built from phone-verified resident and family interviews. Communities can pay Lilisity a flat monthly fee to manage their own listing: photos, prices, contact details, and receiving the inquiries families choose to send them. The fee is the same no matter how many families contact them or move in. Senior Living Alliance, which runs Lilisity, offers the same listing to its member communities as part of their membership; members pay SLA for its resident and family interview program. No community pays Lilisity per inquiry, per referral or per move-in. Payment never changes a testimonial, a rating, or the order of search results. The "Nearby Senior Living Alliance communities" box shows member communities only. How we verify testimonials · How we are paid