Lilisity

Assisted Living

Adam's House

7697 East Nightingale Star Lan, Prescott Valley, AZ 86314 · Map
Licensed for 8 residents

State license active
Is this your community? Claim this listing

Adam's House is a state-licensed assisted living community in Prescott Valley, Arizona. It is licensed for 8 residents. Lilisity publishes no score or ranking for this community; the details below come from the state licensing record.

Assisted LivingCare offered
8 residentsLicensed capacity
State licensedAssisted living home-directed
$3,450 to $5,250/moTypical assisted living start in Arizona, from 88 communities that publish prices

Prices

This community does not publish its prices.

Area costs

Assisted Living in Arizona typically starts at $3,450 to $5,250 a month. Based on 88 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price.

Lilisity’s independent report

What the public record shows

Gathered by Lilisity from state and federal sources. Communities can’t edit this part of the page.

State inspections

12Deficiencies cited
4Complaint inspections

Last inspection: Aug 21, 2025. See the record

License

Active, 8 residents

Assisted Living Home-Directed AL4280H.

Nearest emergency room

7.0 miles

Exceptional Community Hospital Prescott.

Side by side with nearby communities

The 4 nearest communities that offer assisted living, by straight-line distance. Prices are starting prices each community publishes; we never show estimates.

CommunityDistanceLicensed capacityPublished starting priceLicenseInspection citations
Adam's House this community8Not publishedActive12 deficiencies, 2 enforcement cases
Prescott Caring Homes0.2 mi5Not publishedActive21 deficiencies, 1 enforcement case
The Meadows of Prescott Valley0.7 mi10Not publishedActive0 deficiencies, 0 enforcement cases
Brookings0.9 mi10Not publishedActive14 deficiencies, 1 enforcement case
Prescott Valley Assisted Living1.2 mi10Not publishedActive2 deficiencies, 0 enforcement cases
State inspection record12 deficiencies, 2 enforcement cases
Last inspection
August 21, 2025
Inspections
5, 12 deficiencies cited
Complaint inspections
4, 3 with deficiencies cited
Enforcement cases
2, $3,400 in civil penalties
  • No deficiencies cited at the last inspection (August 2025)
  • License active since 2003

Enforcement cases

August 14, 2025: complaint inspection, 4 deficiencies

  • Emergency responders; patient information; hospitals; discharge planning; patient screenings; discharge document A.R.S. § 36-420.04.D
    Based on documentation review and interview, the assisted living home/center failed to maintain a copy of the document provided to the emergency responder for a period of two years after the date of the emergency for one of two resident sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk if the emergency responder was not aware of critical health information for a resident.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: September 15, 2025
  • Administration R9-10-803.A.7
    Based on documentation review, observation, record review, and interview, the governing authority failed to notify the Department according to A.R.S. § 36-425(I), when there was a change in the manager and identifying the name and qualifications of the new manager. The deficient practice posed a risk as the Department was unable to ensure the facility maintained a qualified manager.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: September 30, 2025
  • Administration R9-10-803.K.1
    Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to provide written notification to the Department of a resident's death, if the resident's death was required to be reported according to A.R.S. § 11-593, within one working day after the resident's death. The deficient practice posed a risk as the Department was unable to assess potential dangers to other residents at the facility in a timely manner.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: September 15, 2025
  • Directed Care Services R9-10-815.F.2.a-c
    Based on documentation review, observation, and interviews, the manager failed to ensure there was a means of exiting the facility for a resident who did not have a key, special knowledge for egress, or the ability to expend increased physical effort, which provided access to a secured outside area that monitored or alerted employees of the resident’s egress from the facility. This deficient practice posed a risk if the facility was unaware of the general or specific whereabouts of a resident.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: September 1, 2025

May 6, 2025: complaint, compliance (annual) inspection, 1 deficiency

  • Service Plans R9-10-808.A.5.a
    Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a resident's written service plan is signed and dated by the resident's representative.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: June 18, 2025

December 6, 2023: complaint, compliance (annual) inspection, 7 deficiencies

  • Administration R9-10-803.A.3.b.i-ii
    Based on documentation review, observation, interview, and record review, the governing authority failed to designate, in writing, a manager with a certificate or temporary certificate. The deficient practice posed a risk as the assisted living facility did not have a manager for approximately one month.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: December 6, 2023
  • Personnel R9-10-806.A.7
    Based on documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure documentation was maintained for at least 12 months after the last date on the documentation of the caregivers and assistant caregivers working each day, including the hours worked by each. The deficient practice posed a risk as there was no documentation to identify whether qualified staff were present each day to ensure the health and safety of residents.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: May 15, 2023
  • Residency and Residency Agreements R9-10-807.B.1.a-b
    Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure before or at the time of acceptance of an individual, the individual submitted documentation dated within 90 calendar days before the individual was accepted by the facility to include whether the individual required continuous medical services, continuous or intermittent nursing services, or restraints, and was dated and signed by a physician, registered nurse practitioner, registered nurse, or physician assistant, for one of two residents sampled.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: February 20, 2024
  • Medical Records R9-10-811.A.5
    Based on observation and interview, the manager failed to ensure a resident's medical record was protected from loss, damage, or unauthorized use. The deficient practice posed a risk of protected and sensitive resident health information being disclosed without the resident's consent or knowledge.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: December 6, 2023
  • R9-10-816.B.3.b R9-10-816.B.3.b
    Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure medication administered to a resident was administered in compliance with a medication order, for one of two residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk if a resident experienced a change in condition due to improper medication administration.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: February 20, 2024
  • Tuberculosis Screening R9-10-113.A.2.a.i-iii
    Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the chief administrative officer failed to implement tuberculosis (TB) infection control activities including baseline screening, for two of three personnel members sampled and one of one applicable resident sampled. The deficient practice posed a potential TB exposure risk to residents.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: December 6, 2023
  • Tuberculosis Screening R9-10-113.A.2.d
    Based on documentation review and interview, the chief administrative officer failed to implement tuberculosis (TB) infection control activities including annually assessing the health care institution's risk of exposure to infectious TB. The deficient practice posed a potential TB exposure risk to residents.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: December 6, 2023

Inspections with no deficiencies listed

  • August 21, 2025: complaint inspection. No deficiencies were found during the on-site investigation of complaint 00141505 conducted on August 21, 2025.
  • June 28, 2024: other inspection. No deficiencies were found during the on-site modification to increase the licensed occupancy from seven to eight, completed on June 28, 2024.

Read the full record on AZ Care Check →

ADHS writes a Statement of Deficiencies after each inspection that finds a rule was not met. The community then files a plan of correction, which ADHS accepts or rejects. ADHS investigates complaints on site. A complaint inspection that ends with “No deficiencies were found” did not find a rule violation; deficiencies cited on a complaint inspection are listed with that inspection. AZ Care Check does not list complaints that did not lead to an on-site inspection. Enforcement cases are actions ADHS takes after an inspection, such as a civil money penalty, a provisional license or a license revocation, with their status. This community is licensed for 8 residents; larger communities are inspected and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Arizona Department of Health Services, Licensing Services, AZ Care Check, data as of October 15, 2026, showing all records on AZ Care Check (back to September 5, 2023). Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.

License and ownershipActive license
License type
Assisted Living Home-Directed
License number
AL4280H
License status
Active
Licensed capacity
8

Source: Arizona state licensing records (agency listing), retrieved 2026-09-09. Licensing status is a matter of public record; it is not a quality rating.

Paying with Medicaid and other programsHow Medicaid pays for care in Arizona, and other programs

How Medicaid pays for care in Arizona

  • Arizona Long Term Care System (ALTCS). Yes. Arizona's Medicaid long-term care program, ALTCS, is for people who need nursing facility level of care. Members do not have to live in a nursing home, and many live in an assisted living facility and get needed services there. (state page)

Ask the community whether it accepts Medicaid.

Location and nearby careNearest hospital 7.0 mi, nursing home 3.7 mi, pharmacy 4.1 mi
Nearest hospital with an emergency room
Exceptional Community Hospital Prescott, Prescott. 7.0 miles away, straight line.
Nearest Medicare nursing home
Prescott Valley Nursing & Rehabilitation, Prescott Valley. 3.7 miles away, straight line.
Nearest home health agency office
Mountain Valley Home For Health, Prescott Valley. 3.5 miles away, straight line. Agencies travel to clients, so ask which ones serve this address.
Nearest pharmacy
Fry's Pharmacy. 4.1 miles away, straight line. From OpenStreetMap, which does not list every pharmacy, so one may be closer.
Area
USDA classes ZIP code 86314 as metropolitan (metropolitan core).
Dialysis within 15 miles
Fresenius Kidney Care Prescott Valley East, Prescott Valley, 4.0 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 3 of 5 stars)
Davita Prescott Dialysis, Prescott, 10.5 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 3 of 5 stars)
Hospice
15 Medicare hospices tell CMS they serve ZIP code 86314.
Quality Hospice Care, Inc., office in Prescott Valley, 4.0 miles away, straight line
Alaga Hospice LLC, office in Prescott, 8.3 miles away, straight line
Arizona Life Hospice - Yavapai, office in Prescott, 8.5 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 3 of 5 stars)
Nearest geriatric medicine practice
Neighborhood Outreach Access To Health, Phoenix. 68.4 miles away, straight line. 1 geriatric medicine doctor listed there.

Distances are straight lines from the community, not driving distance. Hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors come from CMS provider data (CMS, hospital list updated Jul 22, 2026). Star ratings are CMS’s own.

Emergency and natural hazard riskFEMA overall risk relatively low; outside FEMA's high-risk flood areas

Public hazard maps for this location. Ask the community about its emergency plan, its generator and where residents would go in an evacuation.

Flood zone
Outside the high and moderate risk flood areas on FEMA's flood map (Zone X, minimal flood hazard, or not studied). (FEMA flood map)
Wildfire risk to homes
In Prescott Valley, AZ, risk to homes is greater than 68% of communities in Arizona and 92% of communities nationwide. USDA rates the whole town or city, not this address. (USDA Forest Service, Wildfire Risk to Communities, April 2026)
FEMA National Risk Index
Overall: relatively low. By hazard: inland flooding relatively moderate, wildfire relatively moderate, tornado very low, heat wave relatively moderate, earthquake relatively low. These are FEMA’s ratings for the census tract, compared with tracts nationwide. (FEMA, December 2025)

A flood zone describes the map at this point, not the building's elevation. In an emergency, follow the local emergency management agency.

Questions to ask on a tour10 questions picked for this community from its record

Picked for this community from its record. Ask them in person and write down the answers.

  1. The state recorded a finding in August 2025. What was it, and how was it fixed?
  2. What does the base rate include, and when did rates last go up?
  3. Who is here at night? Are they awake, or asleep and on call?
  4. Who covers when the owner is sick, on vacation, or away for the day? Can we meet them?
  5. Is it one flat rate, or does it rise with care needs?
  6. Can you help someone who needs two people to move, or a mechanical lift?
  7. How many caregivers are on duty during the day and at night?
  8. What happens if care needs increase? When would someone need to move?
  9. What fees are charged at move-in?
  10. How do you tell families about falls, illness or changes?
What we checked11 public sources we searched, with dates

Every public source we searched for this community. “Nothing on record” means we found no record that matched it. A record can be missed when a name or address differs.

SourceData as ofWhat we found
Arizona Department of Health Services, Licensing Services inspection recordsOct 15, 2026See above
U.S. Department of Labor wage and hour casesOct 15, 2026Nothing on record
OSHA workplace safety inspections since 2016Oct 15, 2026Nothing on record
FEMA flood mapSee above
USDA wildfire riskApr 15, 2026See above
FEMA National Risk IndexSee above
CMS hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors; OpenStreetMap pharmaciesSee above
HUD Multifamily Properties - AssistedJul 6, 2026Nothing on record
State Veterans Homes (NASVH directory)Sep 20, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Hospice - General InformationAug 19, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Home Health Care AgenciesMay 27, 2026Nothing on record
Common questionsAnswers to 4 questions families ask
What type of care does Adam's House provide?

Adam's House is licensed by the state of Arizona for assisted living in Prescott Valley, Arizona. Its licensed capacity is 8 residents.

Does Lilisity rate Adam's House?

No. We publish state licensing details for Adam's House but no score, rating, or ranking. Only communities on the Top Communities list or with a Senior Living Alliance Excellence Award, both based on phone-verified resident and family interviews, are ranked.

How much does Adam's House cost?

Assisted Living in Arizona typically starts at $3,450 to $5,250 a month. Based on 88 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price. Adam's House does not publish its prices.

How do I contact Adam's House?

Visit Adam's House at 7697 East Nightingale Star Lan, Prescott Valley, AZ 86314.

Choosing a small care homeOur care guide: what to look for, what it costs, how families pay, and more questions to ask (PDF)

Report a wrong fact

How Lilisity works. The only scores or rankings Lilisity publishes are the Top Communities list and the Excellence Awards, both built from phone-verified resident and family interviews. Communities can pay Lilisity a flat monthly fee to manage their own listing: photos, prices, contact details, and receiving the inquiries families choose to send them. The fee is the same no matter how many families contact them or move in. Senior Living Alliance, which runs Lilisity, offers the same listing to its member communities as part of their membership; members pay SLA for its resident and family interview program. No community pays Lilisity per inquiry, per referral or per move-in. Payment never changes a testimonial, a rating, or the order of search results. The "Nearby Senior Living Alliance communities" box shows member communities only. How we verify testimonials · How we are paid