Lilisity

Assisted Living

Gems Assisted Living 3

871 Thunderbolt Avenue, Lake Havasu City, AZ 86406 · Map
Licensed for 8 residents

State license active
Is this your community? Claim this listing

Gems Assisted Living 3 is a state-licensed assisted living community in Lake Havasu City, Arizona. It is licensed for 8 residents. Lilisity publishes no score or ranking for this community; the details below come from the state licensing record.

Assisted LivingCare offered
8 residentsLicensed capacity
State licensedAssisted living home-directed
$3,450 to $5,250/moTypical assisted living start in Arizona, from 88 communities that publish prices

Prices

This community does not publish its prices.

Area costs

Assisted Living in Arizona typically starts at $3,450 to $5,250 a month. Based on 88 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price.

Lilisity’s independent report

What the public record shows

Gathered by Lilisity from state and federal sources. Communities can’t edit this part of the page.

State inspections

26Deficiencies cited
3Complaint inspections

Last inspection: Apr 27, 2026. See the record

License

Active, 8 residents

Assisted Living Home-Directed AL10322H.

Nearest emergency room

3.2 miles

Havasu Regional Medical Center, rated 3 of 5 stars by CMS.

Side by side with nearby communities

The 4 nearest communities that offer assisted living, by straight-line distance. Prices are starting prices each community publishes; we never show estimates.

CommunityDistanceLicensed capacityPublished starting priceLicenseInspection citations
Gems Assisted Living 3 this community8Not publishedActive26 deficiencies, 3 enforcement cases
Avista Senior Living Lake Havasu0.5 mi43Not publishedActive4 deficiencies, 1 enforcement case
Neighbors Assisted Living South0.8 mi16Not publishedActive3 deficiencies, 1 enforcement case
Claremont Assisted Living0.8 mi40Not publishedActive7 deficiencies, 2 enforcement cases
Casa Grande Assisted Living Home1.4 mi10Not publishedActive3 deficiencies, 1 enforcement case
State inspection record26 deficiencies, 3 enforcement cases
Last inspection
April 27, 2026
Inspections
3, 26 deficiencies cited
Complaint inspections
3, 3 with deficiencies cited
Enforcement cases
3, $5,500 in civil penalties
  • License active since 2017

Enforcement cases

  • July 16, 2026: Civil Penalty $750 (complete); Notice of Enforcement Action (complete) case closed (complete)
  • June 23, 2025: Civil Penalty $2,750 (complete) case closed (complete)
  • July 3, 2024: Civil Penalty $2,000 (complete) case closed (complete)

April 27, 2026: complaint, compliance (annual) inspection, 11 deficiencies

  • Administration R9-10-803.A.9
    Based on record review and interview, the owner failed to ensure compliance with Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) § 36-411(C)(1) for one of three personnel sampled. The deficient practice posed a safety risk as the Department was unable to determine substantial compliance, as the documentation was not in the personnel records during the inspection. The deficient practice posed a risk if E3 was a danger to a vulnerable population.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: August 3, 2026
  • Residency and Residency Agreements R9-10-807.D.4
    Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure there was a documented residency agreement with the assisted living facility that included a list of the services available from the assisted living facility at an additional fee or charge for two of two sampled residents.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: August 3, 2026
  • Residency and Residency Agreements R9-10-807.D.6
    Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure there was a documented residency agreement with the assisted living facility that included the policy for refunding fees, charges, or deposits, for one of two residents sampled.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: August 3, 2026
  • Service Plans R9-10-808.A.3.c
    Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a resident had a service plan that was established, documented, and implemented that included the amount, type, and frequency of assisted living services being provided to the resident, for one of two residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk if the residents’ needs were not being met.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: August 3, 2026
  • Service Plans R9-10-808.A.4.b.iii
    Based on record review, documentation review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a resident had a service plan that was established, documented, and implemented that was reviewed and updated at least once every three months for a resident receiving directed care services, for one of two residents sampled.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: August 3, 2026
Show all 9
  • Service Plans R9-10-808.A.5.b
    Based on record review, documentation review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a resident had a service plan that was established, documented, and implemented that when initially developed and when updated, was signed and dated by the manager, for one of two residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk if the service plan was not developed to articulate decisions and agreements.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: August 3, 2026
  • Service Plans R9-10-808.C.1.g
    Based on record review, documentation review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a caregiver documented the services provided in the resident’s medical record, for two of two residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk as services could not be verified as provided against a service plan.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: August 3, 2026
  • Personal Care Services R9-10-814.B.1-2
    Based on record review, observation, documentation review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure that for a resident who was confined to a bed because of inability to ambulate even with assistance, the resident’s primary care provider or other medical practitioner examined the resident at least once every six months throughout the duration of the resident’s condition, reviewed the assisted living facility’s scope of services, and signed and dated a determination stating that the resident’s needs can be met by the assisted living facility, for two of two residents sampled.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: August 3, 2026
  • and 3 more in the report

April 10, 2025: complaint, compliance (annual) inspection, 11 deficiencies

  • Health care institutions; fall prevention and fall recovery; training programs; definition A.R.S. § 36-420.01.A
    Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the governing authority failed to administer a training program for all staff regarding fall prevention and fall recovery. The deficient practice posed a risk if a staff member was not properly trained to assist a resident who had fallen and was unable to recover independently.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: September 15, 2025
  • Tuberculosis Screening R9-10-113.A.2.a-f
    Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the chief administrative officer failed to implement tuberculosis (TB) infection control activities including annually providing training and education related to recognizing the signs and symptoms of TB, for seven of twelve sampled employees. The deficient practice posed a potential TB exposure risk to residents.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: September 15, 2025
  • Administration R9-10-803.A.9
    Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the governing authority failed to ensure compliance with Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) § 36-411(A) and (C), for six of twelve sampled employees. The deficient practice posed a risk if the employees were a danger to a vulnerable population and the Department was provided false or misleading information.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: October 28, 2025
  • Personnel R9-10-806.A.10
    Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a caregiver provided current documentation of first aid and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training certification specific to adults before providing assisted living services to a resident, for one of nine sampled caregivers. The deficient practice posed a risk if a manager or a caregiver was unable to meet a resident's needs during an emergency.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: September 15, 2025
  • Personnel R9-10-806.A.4.a-b
    Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a caregiver's skills and knowledge were verified and documented before the caregiver provided physical health services, for one of nine sampled caregivers. The deficient practice posed a risk if a caregiver did not have the skills and knowledge necessary to meet a resident's needs.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: October 28, 2025
Show all 9
  • Personnel R9-10-806.A.8.a-b
    Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a manager and a caregiver provided evidence of freedom from infectious tuberculosis (TB) on or before the date the individual began providing services at or on behalf of the assisted living facility as specified in Arizona Administrative Code (A.A.C.) R9-10-113, for two of ten sampled personnel members. The deficient practice posed a potential TB exposure risk to residents.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: October 28, 2025
  • Residency and Residency Agreements R9-10-807.B.1.a-b
    Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure before or at the time of acceptance of an individual, the individual submitted documentation dated within 90 calendar days before the individual was accepted by the facility to include whether the individual required continuous medical services, continuous or intermittent nursing services, or restraints, for one of two sampled residents. The deficient practice posed a risk if the facility was unable to meet the needs of a resident and the Department was provided false or misleading information.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: November 11, 2025
  • Residency and Residency Agreements R9-10-807.D.2.a-c
    Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure there was a documented residency agreement with the assisted living facility that included terms of occupancy, including the date of occupancy or expected date of occupancy, for one of two sampled residents.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: October 28, 2025
  • and 3 more in the report

April 10, 2024: complaint, compliance (annual) inspection, 4 deficiencies

  • Administration R9-10-803.A.9
    Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the governing authority failed to ensure compliance with Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) § 36-411(A), (C), and (E), for four of five sampled personnel members. The deficient practice posed a risk if a personnel member was a danger to a vulnerable population, or was unqualified to work in a residential care institution.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: April 10, 2024
  • Administration R9-10-803.C.1.r
    Based on documentation review, observation, and interview, the manager failed to ensure policies and procedures covering assistance in the self-administration of medication and medication administration (P&Ps) were implemented to protect the health and safety of a resident. The deficient practice posed a risk to residents who were not prescribed accessible medications.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: April 10, 2024
  • Residency and Residency Agreements R9-10-807.B.1.a-b
    Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure before or at the time of acceptance of an individual, the individual submitted documentation dated within 90 calendar days before the individual was accepted by the facility to include whether the individual required continuous medical services, continuous or intermittent nursing services, or restraints, and was dated and signed by a physician, registered nurse practitioner, registered nurse, or physician assistant, for one of three sampled residents.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: September 20, 2024
  • R9-10-816.B.3.b R9-10-816.B.3.b
    Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure medication administered to a resident was administered in compliance with a medication order, for three of three sampled residents. The deficient practice posed a risk if a resident experienced a change in condition due to improper administration of medication.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: April 20, 2024

Read the full record on AZ Care Check →

ADHS writes a Statement of Deficiencies after each inspection that finds a rule was not met. The community then files a plan of correction, which ADHS accepts or rejects. ADHS investigates complaints on site. A complaint inspection that ends with “No deficiencies were found” did not find a rule violation; deficiencies cited on a complaint inspection are listed with that inspection. AZ Care Check does not list complaints that did not lead to an on-site inspection. Enforcement cases are actions ADHS takes after an inspection, such as a civil money penalty, a provisional license or a license revocation, with their status. This community is licensed for 8 residents; larger communities are inspected and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Arizona Department of Health Services, Licensing Services, AZ Care Check, data as of October 15, 2026, showing all records on AZ Care Check (back to September 5, 2023). Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.

License and ownershipActive license
License type
Assisted Living Home-Directed
License number
AL10322H
License status
Active
Licensed capacity
8

Source: Arizona state licensing records (agency listing), retrieved 2026-09-09. Licensing status is a matter of public record; it is not a quality rating.

Paying with Medicaid and other programsHow Medicaid pays for care in Arizona, and other programs

How Medicaid pays for care in Arizona

  • Arizona Long Term Care System (ALTCS). Yes. Arizona's Medicaid long-term care program, ALTCS, is for people who need nursing facility level of care. Members do not have to live in a nursing home, and many live in an assisted living facility and get needed services there. (state page)

Ask the community whether it accepts Medicaid.

Location and nearby careNearest hospital 3.2 mi, nursing home 0.6 mi, pharmacy 3.3 mi
Nearest hospital with an emergency room
Havasu Regional Medical Center, Lake Havasu City. 3.2 miles away, straight line. CMS overall hospital rating: 3 of 5 stars.
Nearest Medicare nursing home
Haven of Lake Havasu, Lake Havasu City. 0.6 miles away, straight line.
Nearest home health agency office
Havasu Regional Medical Center Home Health, Lake Havasu City. 2.2 miles away, straight line. Agencies travel to clients, so ask which ones serve this address.
Nearest pharmacy
Walgreens. 3.3 miles away, straight line. From OpenStreetMap, which does not list every pharmacy, so one may be closer.
Area
USDA classes ZIP code 86406 as metropolitan (metropolitan core).
Dialysis within 15 miles
032544 Lake Havasu Dialysis (Fmc), Lake Havasu City, 2.4 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 4 of 5 stars)
Hospice
13 Medicare hospices tell CMS they serve ZIP code 86406.
Acacia Hospice Care Of Lake Havasu Inc, office in Lake Havasu City, 2.9 miles away, straight line
Beacon Of Hope Hospice, office in Lake Havasu, 3.1 miles away, straight line
Hospice Of Havasu, Inc., office in Lake Havasu City, 3.7 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 5 of 5 stars)
Nearest geriatric medicine practice
Peter Tran, DO, Henderson. 115.3 miles away, straight line. 1 geriatric medicine doctor listed there.

Distances are straight lines from the community, not driving distance. Hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors come from CMS provider data (CMS, hospital list updated Jul 22, 2026). Star ratings are CMS’s own.

Emergency and natural hazard riskFEMA overall risk relatively low; outside FEMA's high-risk flood areas

Public hazard maps for this location. Ask the community about its emergency plan, its generator and where residents would go in an evacuation.

Flood zone
Outside the high and moderate risk flood areas on FEMA's flood map (Zone X, minimal flood hazard, or not studied). (FEMA flood map)
FEMA National Risk Index
Overall: relatively low. By hazard: inland flooding relatively moderate, wildfire very low, tornado very low, heat wave relatively high, earthquake very low. These are FEMA’s ratings for the census tract, compared with tracts nationwide. (FEMA, December 2025)

A flood zone describes the map at this point, not the building's elevation. In an emergency, follow the local emergency management agency.

Questions to ask on a tour10 questions picked for this community from its record

Picked for this community from its record. Ask them in person and write down the answers.

  1. The state recorded a finding in April 2026. What was it, and how was it fixed?
  2. What does the base rate include, and when did rates last go up?
  3. Who is here at night? Are they awake, or asleep and on call?
  4. Who covers when the owner is sick, on vacation, or away for the day? Can we meet them?
  5. Is it one flat rate, or does it rise with care needs?
  6. Can you help someone who needs two people to move, or a mechanical lift?
  7. How many caregivers are on duty during the day and at night?
  8. What happens if care needs increase? When would someone need to move?
  9. What fees are charged at move-in?
  10. How do you tell families about falls, illness or changes?
What we checked11 public sources we searched, with dates

Every public source we searched for this community. “Nothing on record” means we found no record that matched it. A record can be missed when a name or address differs.

SourceData as ofWhat we found
Arizona Department of Health Services, Licensing Services inspection recordsOct 15, 2026See above
U.S. Department of Labor wage and hour casesOct 15, 2026Nothing on record
OSHA workplace safety inspections since 2016Oct 15, 2026Nothing on record
FEMA flood mapSee above
USDA wildfire riskApr 15, 2026Not shown: FEMA rates wildfire risk here very low
FEMA National Risk IndexSee above
CMS hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors; OpenStreetMap pharmaciesSee above
HUD Multifamily Properties - AssistedJul 6, 2026Nothing on record
State Veterans Homes (NASVH directory)Sep 20, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Hospice - General InformationAug 19, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Home Health Care AgenciesMay 27, 2026Nothing on record
Common questionsAnswers to 4 questions families ask
What type of care does Gems Assisted Living 3 provide?

Gems Assisted Living 3 is licensed by the state of Arizona for assisted living in Lake Havasu City, Arizona. Its licensed capacity is 8 residents.

Does Lilisity rate Gems Assisted Living 3?

No. We publish state licensing details for Gems Assisted Living 3 but no score, rating, or ranking. Only communities on the Top Communities list or with a Senior Living Alliance Excellence Award, both based on phone-verified resident and family interviews, are ranked.

How much does Gems Assisted Living 3 cost?

Assisted Living in Arizona typically starts at $3,450 to $5,250 a month. Based on 88 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price. Gems Assisted Living 3 does not publish its prices.

How do I contact Gems Assisted Living 3?

Visit Gems Assisted Living 3 at 871 Thunderbolt Avenue, Lake Havasu City, AZ 86406.

Choosing a small care homeOur care guide: what to look for, what it costs, how families pay, and more questions to ask (PDF)

Report a wrong fact

How Lilisity works. The only scores or rankings Lilisity publishes are the Top Communities list and the Excellence Awards, both built from phone-verified resident and family interviews. Communities can pay Lilisity a flat monthly fee to manage their own listing: photos, prices, contact details, and receiving the inquiries families choose to send them. The fee is the same no matter how many families contact them or move in. Senior Living Alliance, which runs Lilisity, offers the same listing to its member communities as part of their membership; members pay SLA for its resident and family interview program. No community pays Lilisity per inquiry, per referral or per move-in. Payment never changes a testimonial, a rating, or the order of search results. The "Nearby Senior Living Alliance communities" box shows member communities only. How we verify testimonials · How we are paid