Lilisity

Assisted Living and Memory Care

Pacific View Memory Care Community

1000 6th Ave West, Bandon, OR 97411 · Map
Licensed for 30 residents

State license active
Is this your community? Claim this listing

Pacific View Memory Care Community is a state-licensed assisted living, memory care community in Bandon, Oregon. It is licensed for 30 residents. Lilisity publishes no score or ranking for this community; the details below come from the state licensing record.

Assisted LivingAlso memory care
30 residentsLicensed capacity
State licensedResidential care facility (memory care endorsement)
From $3,900/moStarting price

Prices

Starting prices the community publishes, with the date we checked each one and a link to where it is published. Care charges are usually added after an assessment.

CareStarting atChecked
Assisted Living$3,900 /moOct 12, 2026

Area costs

Assisted Living in Oregon typically starts at $4,600 to $5,800 a month. Based on 108 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price.
Memory Care in Oregon typically starts at $6,000 to $8,200 a month. Based on 78 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price.

Care and services

From the community’s website

What Pacific View Memory Care Community says about itself, quoted from its own site. We have not checked these claims against licensing records. Ask about each one on a tour.

  • Offers respite or short-term stays. Respite Care (page, checked Oct 12, 2026)
  • Offers hospice care on site or works with hospice providers. Hospice Care (page, checked Oct 15, 2026)

Lilisity’s independent report

What the public record shows

Gathered by Lilisity from state and federal sources. Communities can’t edit this part of the page.

State inspections

24Deficiencies cited
21Substantiated violations

Last inspection: Jul 23, 2026. See the record

License

Active, 30 residents

Residential Care Facility (Memory Care endorsement) 5MA137.

Nearest emergency room

1.3 miles

Southern Coos Hospital & Health Center, rated 2 of 5 stars by CMS.

Side by side with nearby communities

The 4 nearest communities that offer assisted living, by straight-line distance. Prices are starting prices each community publishes; we never show estimates.

CommunityDistanceLicensed capacityPublished starting priceLicenseInspection citations
Pacific View Memory Care Community this community30$3,900/moActive24 deficiencies, 21 violations
Pacific View Assisted Living Community0.0 mi85$3,900/moActive16 deficiencies, 8 violations
West Wind Court0.4 mi14Not publishedActive2 deficiencies, 0 violations
Still Waters0.9 mi19Not publishedActive17 deficiencies, 9 violations
New Friends of Coos Bay19.8 mi55Not publishedActive58 deficiencies, 128 violations
State inspection record24 deficiencies, 21 violations
Last inspection
July 23, 2026
Inspections
5, 24 deficiencies cited
Substantiated abuse
7
Substantiated licensing violations
14
Regulatory actions
0
Fines assessed
$4,938.00 (7 violations)
Current owner since
September 1, 2023

Inspections

  • July 23, 2026: Kitchen, 2 deficiencies cited report
    • C0240: Resident Services Meals, Food Sanitation Rule severity level 2, scope L2 Widespread
    • Z0142: Administration Compliance severity level 2, scope L2 Widespread
  • March 4, 2024: Validation, 18 deficiencies cited report
    • C0000: Comment severity level 0
    • C0231: Reporting & Investigating Abuse-Other Action severity level 2, scope L2 Pattern, corrected October 12, 2024
    • C0240: Resident Services Meals, Food Sanitation Rule severity level 2, scope L2 Widespread, corrected May 6, 2024
    • C0252: Resident Move-In and Eval: Res Evaluation severity level 2, scope L2 Isolated, corrected May 6, 2024
    • C0270: Change of Condition and Monitoring severity level 2, scope L2 Pattern, corrected May 6, 2024
    Show all 20
    • C0280: Resident Health Services severity level 2, scope L2 Isolated, corrected May 6, 2024
    • C0290: Res Hlth Srvc: On- and Off-Site Health Srvc severity level 2, scope L2 Isolated, corrected May 6, 2024
    • C0295: Infection Prevention & Control severity level 2, scope L2 Widespread, corrected May 6, 2024
    • C0303: Systems: Treatment Orders severity level 2, scope L2 Pattern, corrected May 6, 2024
    • C0340: Restraints and Supportive Devices severity level 2, scope L2 Isolated, corrected May 6, 2024
    • C0420: Fire and Life Safety: Safety severity level 2, scope L2 Widespread, corrected May 6, 2024
    • C0455: Inspections and Investigation: Insp Interval severity level 2, scope L2 Isolated, corrected October 12, 2024
    • C0513: Doors, Walls, Elevators, Odors severity level 2, scope L2 Widespread, corrected May 6, 2024
    • C0530: Housekeeping and Laundry severity level 2, scope L2 Widespread, corrected May 6, 2024
    • C0540: Heating and Ventilation severity level 2, scope L2 Widespread, corrected May 6, 2024
    • Z0142: Administration Compliance severity level 2, scope L2 Widespread, corrected October 12, 2024
    • Z0155: Staff Training Requirements severity level 2, scope L2 Pattern, corrected May 6, 2024
    • Z0162: Compliance With Rules Health Care severity level 2, scope L2 Pattern, corrected May 6, 2024
    • Z0173: Secure Outdoor Recreation Area severity level 2, scope L2 Widespread, corrected May 6, 2024
    • Z0176: Resident Rooms severity level 2, scope L2 Widespread, corrected May 6, 2024
  • December 21, 2023: Complaint Investig., 1 deficiency cited report
    • C0361: Acuity-Based Staffing Tool severity level 2, scope L2 Widespread
  • March 21, 2023: State Licensure, 2 deficiencies cited report
    • C0000: Comment severity level 0
    • C0240: Resident Services Meals, Food Sanitation Rule severity level 2, scope L2 Widespread, corrected May 20, 2023
    • Z0142: Administration Compliance severity level 2, scope L2 Widespread, corrected May 20, 2023
  • September 29, 2022: Complaint Investig., 1 deficiency cited report
    • C0010: Licensing Complaint Investigation severity level 2, scope L2 Isolated
    • C0300: Systems: Medications and Treatments severity level 2, scope L2 Isolated

Substantiated abuse or neglect

  • February 8, 2026: Failed to provide safe environment Abuse: Neglect; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; fine $250.00; report
    Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration); 411-054-0027 (Resident Rights and Protections); 411-054-0028 (Reporting and Investigating Abuse and Other Actions Affecting Resident Welfare); 411-054-0030 (Resident Services); 411-054-0036 (Service Plan – General)
    State’s findings

    On or about February 8, 2026, the facility failed to appropriately monitor and supervise Witness 1 (W1) according to his/her known behaviors resulting in a physical altercation with Alleged Victim (AV), causing unreasonable discomfort to the AV. The facility's failure is a violation of resident rights, is considered neglect of care and constitutes abuse.

  • August 3, 2024: Failed to properly plan care Abuse: Neglect; Level 3 - Moderate harm or potential for serious harm; fine $1,500.00; report
    Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration); 411-054-0027 (Resident Rights and Protections); 411-054-0028 (Reporting and Investigating Abuse and Other Actions Affecting Resident Welfare); 411-054-0030 (Resident Services); 411-054-0036 (Service Plan – General)
    State’s findings

    The Alleged Victim (AV) is a known fall risk and has suffered multiple falls from May 2024 through August 2024, these falls were with and without injury. Prior to May 2024, staff were working to get AV physical therapy and working on medication believed to cause dizziness for AV, however, these items were not followed up on timely, and AV did not get physical therapy until August 1, 2024. The facility interventions for prevent AV from falling were not consistent or able to be followed by facility staff, resulting in AV continuing to suffer falls. AV had multiple hospitalization from falls and continued to suffer from falls, averaging two falls per week. The facility's failure to properly care plan to reduce AV's risk of falls is a violation of resident rights, is considered neglect of care and constitutes abuse.

  • May 16, 2024: Failed to provide safe environment Abuse: Neglect; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; fine $1,000.00; report
    Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration); 411-054-0027 (Resident Rights and Protections); 411-054-0028 (Reporting and Investigating Abuse and Other Actions Affecting Resident Welfare); 411-054-0030 (Resident Services)
    State’s findings

    On or about May 16, 2024, the Alleged Victim (AV) was in his/her room with a visitor. Witness #1(W1) entered AV's room and began rubbing AV's feet, making AV uncomfortable. The visitor in AV's room tried to redirect W1 three times before W1 stopped. AV typically has a mesh stop sign across his/her door to the room, however, there is no mention in the service plan of how to utilize this when AV has visitors, and AV has stated that the stop doesn't work, as W1 will just duck under the stop to get into his/her room. The facility's failure to ensure the safety of AV is a violation of resident rights, is considered neglect of care and constitutes abuse.

  • May 16, 2024: Failed to properly plan care Abuse: Neglect; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; fine $1,000.00; report
    Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration); 411-054-0027 (Resident Rights and Protections); 411-054-0028 (Reporting and Investigating Abuse and Other Actions Affecting Resident Welfare); 411-054-0036 (Service Plan – General)
    State’s findings

    The Alleged Victim (AV) is a known fall risk due to vision impairment and has suffered multiple falls from March 2024 until May 2024. On or about May 16, 2024, AV was returning from the bathroom and suffered a fall, causing a skin tear to his/her knee. Interventions in place were not effective to keep AV from falling. The facility's failure to properly care plan to reduce the risk of falls is a violation of resident rights, is considered neglect of care and constitutes abuse.

  • December 7, 2023: Failed to properly plan care Abuse: Neglect; Level 3 - Moderate harm or potential for serious harm; fine $500.00; report
    Rules: 411-054-0027 (Resident Rights and Protections); 411-054-0028 (Reporting and Investigating Abuse and Other Actions Affecting Resident Welfare); 411-054-0036 (Service Plan – General)
    State’s findings

    The facility failed to provide appropriate services according to the Alleged Victim’s (AV) care needs and wound care. AV was admitted to the hospital on December 7, 2023, and during AV's initial assessment at the hospital AV was found to be in an adult brief that was completely saturated in foul smelling urine. AV's brief was fully soaked through and was leaking out the sides, the urine was dark in color and there was blood on the edge of AV's brief. During AV's assessment at the hospital, skin break down and open wounds were observed all over AV's genitals and buttock area. The hospital stated that AV's skin break down was due to prolonged contact with a soiled diaper. The facility's failure to provide appropriate services resulted in AV’s condition worsening causing further unreasonable discomfort, which is a violation of resident rights, is considered neglect of care and constitutes abuse.

  • November 29, 2023: Failed to provide a safe medication administration system Abuse: Neglect; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; fine $500.00; report
    Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration); 411-054-0027 (Resident Rights and Protections); 411-054-0028 (Reporting and Investigating Abuse and Other Actions Affecting Resident Welfare); 411-054-0055 (Medications and Treatments)
    State’s findings

    Alleged Victim (AV) is a resident and under the care of this facility. On or about November 28, 2023, AV was prescribed a pain patch by AV's medical community partner to determine if AV's behaviors were caused by pain. The facility dispensed one pain patch which fell off and another patch was not dispensed or applied to AV. Based on facility documentation and interviews, facility staff requested clarification as to why the pain patch was ordered when AV had not indicated AV was in pain at any time. Facility staff were directed to not apply a second pain patch after the initial one fell off of AV. The facility contacted AV's primary care physician (PCP) for clarification of the order knowing AV was under the care of AV's medical community partner and all medication questions were to go through the medical community partner and not through the PCP that facility staff contacted. The facility has a responsibility to dispense medications as ordered by medical community partner. The facility's failure to dispense AV's pain patch as ordered as well as not following the order resulted in unreasonable discomfort, which is considered a violation of resident rights, is considered neglect of care and constitutes abuse. Alleged Perpetrator 2 (AP2) is an employee of this facility and assists indirectly with AV's care. AV's service plan requires interventions/assistance with medication management resulting in the facility dispensing medications. AP2 refused to have staff follow AV's doctor's order for the pain patch to be dispensed and attempted to contact PCP via email, fax, and phone call without success to attempt to discuss the pain patch order. All medical contact should go through community partner as per community partner documentation. AV's community partner did not receive a request to review AV's medications from AP2. AP2 contacted AV's family, and a meeting was arranged. After the meeting, it was decided to dismiss AV's current primary care physician and bring in a new primary care physician who discontinued AV's pain patch. Based on facility documentation and interviews, AP2 stated the order for AV's pain patch was too extreme as AV had no prior use of pain medication. AP2 requested overdose medication due to concerns of AV receiving the pain patch. AV did not show signs/symptoms of oversedation due to the pain patch being applied/dispensed. AP2 instructed staff to not dispense AV's pain patch as order. AP2's actions of not following the order resulted in unreasonable discomfort to AV which is considered neglect of care and constitutes abuse. Based on facility documentation and interviews, Alleged Perpetrator 3 (AP3) put a hold on AV's pain patch indicating the pain patch was not to be dispensed as ordered. AP3 requested clarification on the order for the pain as AP3 did not agree with the order or dosage. AV's medical community partner was providing oversight of AV's care, and all medication orders/questions were to be completed through the medical community partner. AP3 instructed staff to not dispense AV's pain patch as ordered. AP3's lack of following the order resulted in unreasonable discomfort for AV which is considered neglect of care and constitutes abuse. An unknown Alleged Perpetrator 4 (AP4) allegedly financially exploited AV. An investigation inconclusively determined no abuse occurred by AP4.

  • October 19, 2021: Failed to follow care plan Abuse: Neglect; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; fine $188.00; report
    Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration); 411-054-0027 (Resident Rights and Protections); 411-054-0028 (Reporting and Investigating Abuse and Other Actions Affecting Resident Welfare); 411-054-0036 (Service Plan – General)
    State’s findings

    The Alleged Victim (AV) is care planned to have his/her compression stockings removed each night prior to bed time. On or about October 19, 2021, AV was complaining that his/her legs hurt. It was discovered that AV's compression stockings were not removed at night as care planned. The facility failed to follow the care plan, which is a violation of resident rights, is considered neglect of care and constitutes abuse.

Substantiated licensing violations

  • July 11, 2026: Failed to provide a safe medication administration system Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
    Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration); 411-054-0055 (Medications and Treatments)
    State’s findings

    On or about July 11, 2026, the facility failed to provide a safe medication administration system to ensure the Alleged Victim’s (AV) medications were administered as ordered. The facility's failure is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.

  • June 2, 2026: Failed to staff as indicated by ABST Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
    Rules: 411-054-0037 (Acuity-Based Staffing Tool)
    State’s findings

    On or about June 2, 2026, the facility failed to consistently staff to the levels, intensity and qualifications indicated by the Acuity-Based Staffing Tool (ABST). Inconsistencies were identified between the staffing schedule and the data produced by the ABST. Facility was not staffed to the levels as indicated by the ABST to meet the scheduled and unscheduled needs of residents. An investigation determined this is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.

  • May 19, 2026: Failed to staff as indicated by ABST Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
    Rules: 411-054-0037 (Acuity-Based Staffing Tool)
    State’s findings

    On or about May 19, 2026, the facility failed to consistently staff to the levels, intensity and qualifications indicated by the Acuity-Based Staffing Tool (ABST). Inconsistencies were identified between the staffing schedule and the data produced by the ABST. Facility was not staffed to the levels as indicated by the ABST to meet the scheduled and unscheduled needs of residents. An investigation determined this is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.

  • May 16, 2026: Failed to cooperate with an investigation Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
    Rules: 411-054-0105 (Inspections and Investigations)
    State’s findings

    Based on interview and record review, conducted during an investigation on July 30, 2026, the facility’s failed to provide records to the Department upon request. Findings include but are not limited to: A review of electronic communication, dated 05/26/26, indicated the Department requested documents related to the facility’s Acuity-Based Staffing Tool (ABST) alleged event date 05/16/26. The facility had not provided all requested documentation by the due date of 05/27/26. The facility’s failure to provide records to the Department upon request is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.

  • May 13, 2026: Failed to staff as indicated by ABST Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
    Rules: 411-054-0037 (Acuity-Based Staffing Tool)
    State’s findings

    On or about May 13, 2026, the facility failed to consistently staff to the levels, intensity and qualifications indicated by the Acuity-Based Staffing Tool (ABST). Inconsistencies were identified between the staffing schedule and the data produced by the ABST. Facility was not staffed to the levels as indicated by the ABST to meet the scheduled and unscheduled needs of residents. An investigation determined this is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.

Show all 14
  • May 11, 2026: Failed to staff as indicated by ABST Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
    Rules: 411-054-0037 (Acuity-Based Staffing Tool)
    State’s findings

    On or about May 11, 2026, the facility failed to consistently staff to the levels, intensity and qualifications indicated by the Acuity-Based Staffing Tool (ABST). Inconsistencies were identified between the staffing schedule and the data produced by the ABST. Facility was not staffed to the levels as indicated by the ABST to meet the scheduled and unscheduled needs of residents. An investigation determined this is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.

  • May 8, 2026: Failed to staff as indicated by ABST Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
    Rules: 411-054-0037 (Acuity-Based Staffing Tool)
    State’s findings

    On or about May 8, 2026, the facility failed to consistently staff to the levels, intensity and qualifications indicated by the Acuity-Based Staffing Tool (ABST). Inconsistencies were identified between the staffing schedule and the data produced by the ABST. Facility was not staffed to the levels as indicated by the ABST to meet the scheduled and unscheduled needs of residents. An investigation determined this is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.

  • April 13, 2026: Failed to cooperate with an investigation Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
    Rules: 411-054-0105 (Inspections and Investigations)
    State’s findings

    The facility failed to provide documentation upon request. An investigation determined this is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.

  • April 12, 2026: Failed to provide safe environment Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
    Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration)
    State’s findings

    On or about April 12, 2026, Alleged Perpetrator 2 (AP2) attempted to escort Alleged Victim (AV) to a dining table in the facility’s dining area for mealtime. AV resisted and did not appear willing to follow AP2. AP2 was observed pulling and tugging on AV, grasping AV’s arm and wrist, while attempting to lead AV to a seat, despite AV’s continued resistance. Under OAR?411-020-0002(1)(a)(A)(i), physical abuse includes “the use of physical force that may result in bodily injury, physical pain, or impairment,” such as shoving or pulling. Because AP2 used force to restrict AV’s movement for convenience, rather than for safety or therapeutic reasons, this conduct meets the criteria for wrongful restraint under OAR?411-020-0002(1)(h)(A)(iii) and is considered physical abuse. AP2's actions caused AV unreasonable discomfort which constitutes physical abuse. The facility failed to provide a safe environment for AV which is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.

  • February 12, 2026: Failed to provide a safe medication administration system Licensing Violation; Level 4 - Serious harm, death, imminent danger or chronic regulatory noncompliance; report
    Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration); 411-054-0027 (Resident Rights and Protections); 411-054-0055 (Medications and Treatments)
    State’s findings

    On or about February 12, 2026, Alleged Victim was evaluated by his/her Primary Care Provider (PCP) for ongoing behavioral concerns. AV's PCP issued new medication orders, including a cross-taper from AV’s previous behavioral medication to a new behavioral medication and initiation of an anxiety medication. These orders were faxed to the facility. Facility documentation and interviews indicate the medication orders were not implemented in a timely manner. AP2 directed staff to withhold the prescribed medications due to disagreeing with the medication changes, despite not being licensed to override the PCP’s orders. As a result, the new behavioral medication was not started as ordered, and the anxiety medication was held without provider authorization until February 18, 2026. During this period, AV’s behaviors escalated, including a resident-to-resident aggression incident on February 14, 2026. Some improvement in symptoms was noted only after the delayed initiation of the anxiety medication. AV later experienced a fall requiring hospital transfer, followed by additional medication changes, and subsequently experienced a significant decline resulting in hospice placement. During the investigation, AV’s PCP stated it was their clinical opinion that the medication error and delay in implementing the ordered medications may have contributed to AV’s significant decline. AP2's actions caused AV unreasonable and unnecessary pain, discomfort, and harm which is considered neglect of care and constitutes abuse. AP2 also has a prior history related to this matter in which a Stipulated Final Order and Settlement Agreement was executed in Investigation 00299625-AP-253036. Both the February 12, 2026, incident and Investigation 00299625-AP-253036 demonstrate that AP2 has a pattern of repeatedly disregarding medication orders. The facility failed to ensure AP2 provided appropriate administrative oversight of the facility's medication administration system which is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.

  • January 13, 2026: Failed to provide safe environment Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
    Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration); 411-054-0027 (Resident Rights and Protections); 411-054-0030 (Resident Services)
    State’s findings

    The facility failed to provide appropriate supervision to the Alleged Victim (AV) according to his/her needs resulting in AV eloping the secured building, without staff knowledge. The facility's failure to provide a safe environment for AV based on his/her care needs is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.

  • November 30, 2023: Failed to use an ABST Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
    Rules: 411-054-0037 (Acuity-Based Staffing Tool)
    State’s findings

    The facility failed to have an updated Acuity-Based Staffing Tool (ABST) that accurately reflected the resident population and their care needs. Inconsistencies were identified between the resident roster, care plans, and the data entered into the ABST. An investigation determined this is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.

  • September 10, 2022: Failed to provide a safe medication administration system Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
    Rules: 411-054-0055 (Medications and Treatments)
    State’s findings

    The facility failed to ensure adequate professional oversight of the medication and treatment administration system. The facility's failure is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.

  • May 13, 2022: Failed to provide a safe medication administration system Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
    Rules: 411-054-0055 (Medications and Treatments)
    State’s findings

    The facility failed to carry out medication orders as prescribed. An investigation determined the facility failed to provide a medication administration system which is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.

Read the full record on the state’s site →

ODHS lists only substantiated violations: “either a substantiated instance of abuse or a licensing violation. Open investigations and complaints that are being appealed by the provider are not listed.” Oregon counts neglect as a form of abuse; see the state’s definitions of abuse. Each violation shows the level ODHS gives it, in the state’s words (for example “2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm”), and any fine ODHS assessed. Inspection citations show the state’s severity level and scope, and the date ODHS recorded the problem as corrected when it lists one. Rule names come from the Oregon Administrative Rules. ODHS: “Formal regulatory actions can range from a condition placed upon a license due to non-compliance or a notice to revoke a license.” This community is licensed for 30 residents; larger communities are inspected and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Oregon Department of Human Services, Long-Term Care Licensing, data as of October 15, 2026, showing the last five years. Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.

License and ownershipActive license
License type
Residential Care Facility (Memory Care endorsement)
License number
5MA137
License status
Active
Licensed capacity
30

Source: Oregon state licensing records (agency listing), retrieved 2026-09-09. Licensing status is a matter of public record; it is not a quality rating.

Paying with Medicaid and other programsOn the Oregon list of Medicaid providers (2026)

On the Oregon list of Medicaid providers. Listed as Pacific View Memory Care Community under Accepts Medicaid (ODHS licensing record). (state list, as of Sep 9, 2026)

Being on the list means the community has taken part in the program. Ask whether it has a Medicaid opening now, and how many residents it serves on Medicaid.

Location and nearby careNearest hospital 1.3 mi, nursing home 14.9 mi, pharmacy 12.6 mi
Nearest hospital with an emergency room
Southern Coos Hospital & Health Center, Bandon. 1.3 miles away, straight line. CMS overall hospital rating: 2 of 5 stars.
Nearest Medicare nursing home
Myrtle Point Rehabilitation & Care, Myrtle Point. 14.9 miles away, straight line.
Nearest home health agency office
Oregon Coast Home Health, Coos Bay. 20.1 miles away, straight line. Agencies travel to clients, so ask which ones serve this address.
Nearest pharmacy
Safeway Pharmacy. 12.6 miles away, straight line. From OpenStreetMap, which does not list every pharmacy, so one may be closer.
Area
USDA classes ZIP code 97411 as small town (small town core).
Hospice
2 Medicare hospices tell CMS they serve ZIP code 97411.
Pacific Home Health & Hospice, office in Coos Bay, 20.4 miles away, straight line
South Coast Hospice, office in Coos Bay, 20.9 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 3 of 5 stars)
Nearest geriatric medicine practice
Peacehealth Medical Group, Eugene. 92.0 miles away, straight line. 2 geriatric medicine doctors listed there.

Distances are straight lines from the community, not driving distance. Hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors come from CMS provider data (CMS, hospital list updated Jul 22, 2026). Star ratings are CMS’s own.

Emergency and natural hazard riskFEMA overall risk very high; in FEMA's high-risk flood area (Zone AE)

Public hazard maps for this location. Ask the community about its emergency plan, its generator and where residents would go in an evacuation.

Flood zone
Zone AE: 1% annual chance flood area (high risk); base flood elevation set. This is inside FEMA's Special Flood Hazard Area, where flood insurance is required for federally backed mortgages. (FEMA flood map)
FEMA National Risk Index
Overall: very high. By hazard: inland flooding relatively high, coastal flooding relatively low, wildfire very low, tornado very low, heat wave relatively low, earthquake very high. These are FEMA’s ratings for the census tract, compared with tracts nationwide. (FEMA, December 2025)

A flood zone describes the map at this point, not the building's elevation. In an emergency, follow the local emergency management agency.

Questions to ask on a tour10 questions picked for this community from its record

Picked for this community from its record. Ask them in person and write down the answers.

  1. The state recorded a finding in July 2026. What was it, and how was it fixed?
  2. This address is in FEMA's high-risk flood area. Where do residents go in an evacuation, and how do you move them?
  3. Your published starting price is a base rate. What would the total monthly cost be for my parent's needs?
  4. How much have prices gone up in each of the last three years?
  5. How many caregivers work in memory care during the day, the evening and overnight, and for how many residents?
  6. What dementia training does each caregiver get before working alone, and every year after?
  7. How do staff respond when a resident is agitated, frightened or tries to leave?
  8. How many caregivers are on duty during the day and at night?
  9. What happens if care needs increase? When would someone need to move?
  10. What fees are charged at move-in?
What we checked13 public sources we searched, with dates

Every public source we searched for this community. “Nothing on record” means we found no record that matched it. A record can be missed when a name or address differs.

SourceData as ofWhat we found
Oregon Department of Human Services, Long-Term Care Licensing inspection recordsOct 15, 2026See above
Oregon Medicaid provider listSep 9, 2026See above
U.S. Department of Labor wage and hour casesOct 15, 2026Nothing on record
OSHA workplace safety inspections since 2016Oct 15, 2026Nothing on record
FEMA flood mapSee above
USDA wildfire riskApr 15, 2026Not shown: FEMA rates wildfire risk here very low
FEMA National Risk IndexSee above
CMS hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors; OpenStreetMap pharmaciesSee above
HUD Multifamily Properties - AssistedJul 6, 2026Nothing on record
State Veterans Homes (NASVH directory)Sep 20, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Hospice - General InformationAug 19, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Home Health Care AgenciesMay 27, 2026Nothing on record
The community’s own websiteSee above
Common questionsAnswers to 4 questions families ask
What type of care does Pacific View Memory Care Community provide?

Pacific View Memory Care Community is licensed by the state of Oregon for assisted living, memory care in Bandon, Oregon. Its licensed capacity is 30 residents.

Does Lilisity rate Pacific View Memory Care Community?

No. We publish state licensing details for Pacific View Memory Care Community but no score, rating, or ranking. Only communities on the Top Communities list or with a Senior Living Alliance Excellence Award, both based on phone-verified resident and family interviews, are ranked.

How much does Pacific View Memory Care Community cost?

Assisted Living in Oregon typically starts at $4,600 to $5,800 a month. Based on 108 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price. The starting prices it publishes are in the Prices section on this page.

How do I contact Pacific View Memory Care Community?

Use Pacific View Memory Care Community's website, pacificviewsl.com, or visit at 1000 6th Ave West, Bandon, OR 97411.

Choosing assisted livingOur care guide: what to look for, what it costs, how families pay, and more questions to ask (PDF)

Report a wrong fact

How Lilisity works. The only scores or rankings Lilisity publishes are the Top Communities list and the Excellence Awards, both built from phone-verified resident and family interviews. Communities can pay Lilisity a flat monthly fee to manage their own listing: photos, prices, contact details, and receiving the inquiries families choose to send them. The fee is the same no matter how many families contact them or move in. Senior Living Alliance, which runs Lilisity, offers the same listing to its member communities as part of their membership; members pay SLA for its resident and family interview program. No community pays Lilisity per inquiry, per referral or per move-in. Payment never changes a testimonial, a rating, or the order of search results. The "Nearby Senior Living Alliance communities" box shows member communities only. How we verify testimonials · How we are paid