Inland Point Retirement Community

Last inspection

April 25, 2024

Inspections

2, 5 deficiencies cited

Substantiated abuse

1

Substantiated licensing violations

6

Regulatory actions

0

Fines assessed

$188.00 (1 violation)

Current owner since

May 1, 2015

• No deficiencies cited at the last inspection (April 2024)

Inspections

• April 25, 2024: State Licensure, 0 deficiencies cited report
  • C0000: Comment severity level 0
• January 3, 2023: Validation, 5 deficiencies cited report
  • C0000: Comment severity level 0
  • C0370: Staffing Requirements and Training – Pre-Serv severity level 2, scope L2 Pattern, corrected February 28, 2023
  • C0372: Training Within 30 Days: Direct Care Staff severity level 2, scope L2 Pattern, corrected February 28, 2023
  • C0374: Annual and Biennial Inservice For All Staff severity level 2, scope L2 Pattern, corrected February 28, 2023
  • C0420: Fire and Life Safety: Safety severity level 2, scope L2 Widespread, corrected February 28, 2023
  • C0422: Fire and Life Safety: Training For Residents severity level 2, scope L2 Widespread, corrected February 28, 2023

Substantiated abuse or neglect

• November 1, 2023: Failed to provide safe environment Abuse: Neglect; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; fine $188.00; report
  Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration); 411-054-0027 (Resident Rights and Protections); 411-054-0028 (Reporting and Investigating Abuse and Other Actions Affecting Resident Welfare); 411-054-0030 (Resident Services); 411-054-0036 (Service Plan – General)
  State’s findings

  Alleged Victim (AV) relies on the facility for a safe environment. Witness 1 (W1) has history of behaviors, making perverse comments toward staff and/or making staff feel uncomfortable. W1 and AV started hand holding and were observed sitting together on occasions with blankets. Staff reported having apprehension regarding the appropriateness of the dynamic between W1 and AV. On or about November 1, 2023, Witness 3 (W3) noticed AV had a startled, frozen expression in W1's presence. AV told W3 that W1 tried to have AV touch W1's privates. There was a negative change to AV's baseline mood throughout the following day. AV appeared more confused, skittish, and guarded. AV was observed to be tearful during the night shift. The facility failed to adjust the service plan for W1 behaviors, and failed to provide a safe environment for AV, which is a violation of resident rights, is neglect of care and constitutes abuse.

Substantiated licensing violations

• September 10, 2025: Failed to protect resident from financial exploitation Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
  Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration); 411-054-0027 (Resident Rights and Protections); 411-054-0028 (Reporting and Investigating Abuse and Other Actions Affecting Resident Welfare)
  State’s findings

  The Alleged Victim (AV) orders items from door dash often. AV ordered a coffee and Alleged Perpetrator #2 (AP2) made a comment to AV, "Where's mine?". The next time that AV ordered from door dash, AV asked AP2 if he/she wanted anything. AV ordered AP2 a burrito. On another occasion, AV had ordered too much of pasta and shared that with AP2. AP2 has been trained and counseled not to accept money, gratuities or gifts from residents, AP2's actions are a violation of resident rights, are considered neglect of care and constitute financial abuse. The facility's failure to ensure AV was safe from financial abuse is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.

• September 6, 2025: Failed to protect resident from financial exploitation Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
  Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration); 411-054-0027 (Resident Rights and Protections); 411-054-0028 (Reporting and Investigating Abuse and Other Actions Affecting Resident Welfare)
  State’s findings

  On or about September 6, 2025, the Alleged Victim (AV) was setting up his/her television and Alleged Perpetrator #2 (AP2) assisted AV with that task. AV gave AP2 $20.00 for assisting him/ her with this task. On a prior occasion, AP2 also accepted money from AV after assisting AV with moving into the facility. AP2 has been trained and counseled not to accept money, gratuities or gifts from residents, AP2's actions are a violation of resident rights, are considered neglect of care and constitute financial abuse, per OAR 411-020-0002(1)(e)(E). The facility's failure to ensure AV was safe from financial abuse is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.

• September 1, 2025: Failed to protect resident from financial exploitation Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
  Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration); 411-054-0027 (Resident Rights and Protections); 411-054-0028 (Reporting and Investigating Abuse and Other Actions Affecting Resident Welfare)
  State’s findings

  On or about September 1, 2025, Alleged Perpetrator #2 (AP2) asked the Alleged Victim (AV) for $20.00 because he/ she needed gas money. AV gave the money to AP2 and asked when their payday was and advised they would see them then. AP2 never paid AV back the borrowed money. AP2 has been trained and counseled not to accept money, gratuities or gifts from residents, AP2's actions are a violation of resident rights, are considered neglect of care and constitute financial abuse, per OAR 411-020-0002(1)(e)(E). The facility's failure to ensure AV was safe from financial abuse is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.

• March 16, 2025: Failed to provide or assist with hygiene Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
  Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration); 411-054-0027 (Resident Rights and Protections); 411-054-0028 (Reporting and Investigating Abuse and Other Actions Affecting Resident Welfare); 411-054-0030 (Resident Services)
  State’s findings

  On or about March 16, 2025, at approximately 9:00 PM, the Alleged Victim (AV) used his/her pendant to call for assistance. Alleged Perpetrator #2 (AP2) answered AV's call. AV stated they needed to use the restroom so they didn't miss breakfast. AP2 stated it wasn't time for breakfast so no need to get up and did not get AV out of bed to use the restroom. AV's phone and pendant were on the bedside table, which was moved by AP2, therefore, AV could not reach either item to call for assistance. At 1:00 or 2:00 AM, AV could not hold his/her urine any longer and had no way to call staff for help. Alleged Perpetrator #3 (AP3) was responsible for checking on AV in the morning and did not check on AV all morning or at lunch time. AV was not checked on until another staff arrived at work at 1:00 PM to assist AV with a shower. AV laid in his/her urine, in his/her bed for approximately 12 hours, leaving him/her in unreasonable discomfort, frustrated, trapped and embarrassed. AP2 and AP3's failure is a violation of resident rights, is considered neglect of care and constitutes abuse. The facility's failure to ensure AV's needs were met is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.

• March 22, 2024: Failed to protect resident from financial exploitation Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
  Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration); 411-054-0027 (Resident Rights and Protections); 411-054-0028 (Reporting and Investigating Abuse and Other Actions Affecting Resident Welfare)
  State’s findings

  Alleged Victim (AV) is missing two envelopes of money in a total of approximately $800.00 to $900.00. AV did not lock the money in their lock box. Around the same time there was money missing from the beauty shop. A video was taken of a person in the beauty shop in the middle of the night on April 12, 2024. In the video a light comes on, a hand in a brace opening drawers and cabinets as well as looking through a book is seen. Alleged Perpetrator 2 (AP2) was identified in the video by their hand brace and watch. AP2 was seen on camera in the beauty shop. There were no cameras or witnesses who saw AP2 enter AV's apartment nor saw AP2 take AV's money. The money was taken by an Unknown Alleged Perpetrator #3 (AP3) and this person is responsible for theft of property, which is considered financial exploitation and constitutes abuse. The facility failed to protect AV from financial exploitation which is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.

• February 16, 2024: Failed to protect resident from financial exploitation Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
  Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration); 411-054-0027 (Resident Rights and Protections); 411-054-0028 (Reporting and Investigating Abuse and Other Actions Affecting Resident Welfare)
  State’s findings

  On or about February 16, 2024, Alleged Victim (AV) reported AV was missing $300.00 s/he withdrew from the bank on February 6, 2024. AV reported AV was missing another $150.00, but AV was not able to provide a timeframe of when money went missing. AV reported $15.00 was taken from AV's apartment on or about March 18, 2024. AV reported CBD oils were missing from AV's medicine cabinet. After the money was reported missing, AV gave management permission to search AV's apartment. AV originally indicated AV didn't have a key for AV's lock box but AV was ultimately able to produce the lock box key to check the lock box. Money missing from AV's apartment is not an isolated incident. Around the time this happened, money was missing from the beauty shop and from another resident. The facility set up a camera in the beauty shop in efforts to find out who is responsible. Alleged Perpetrator (AP2) has a wrist brace and wears a particular watch. AP2's face is not visible in the footage, but the wrist brace and the watch are. There was no money in the drawers at the time the footage was captured of AP2 going through the drawers. It was suspected AP2 was responsible for the theft. AP2 denied having any involvement with taking money, CBD Oil from AV's apartment or beauty shop. It is unknown who took the money and CBD oils. The items were taken by an Unknown Alleged Perpetrator #3 (AP) and this person is responsible for theft of property, which is considered financial exploitation and constitutes abuse. The facility failed to protect AV from financial exploitation which is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules. The allegation that AP2 financially exploited AV was investigated, and wrongdoing was not determined.

Read the full record on the state’s site →

ODHS lists only substantiated violations: “either a substantiated instance of abuse or a licensing violation. Open investigations and complaints that are being appealed by the provider are not listed.” Oregon counts neglect as a form of abuse; see the state’s definitions of abuse. Each violation shows the level ODHS gives it, in the state’s words (for example “2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm”), and any fine ODHS assessed. Inspection citations show the state’s severity level and scope, and the date ODHS recorded the problem as corrected when it lists one. Rule names come from the Oregon Administrative Rules. ODHS: “Formal regulatory actions can range from a condition placed upon a license due to non-compliance or a notice to revoke a license.” This community is licensed for 60 residents; larger communities are inspected and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Oregon Department of Human Services, Long-Term Care Licensing, data as of October 15, 2026, showing the last five years. Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.