Assisted Living
Kelly Gardens Residential Care
813 Ne Kelly Ave, Gresham, OR 97030 · Map
Licensed for 61 residents
Kelly Gardens Residential Care is a state-licensed assisted living community in Gresham, Oregon. It is licensed for 61 residents. Lilisity publishes no score or ranking for this community; the details below come from the state licensing record.
Prices
This community does not publish its prices.
Area costs
Care and services
From the community’s website
What Kelly Gardens Residential Care says about itself, quoted from its own site. We have not checked these claims against licensing records. Ask about each one on a tour.
- Smoke-free.
Smoke-free environment
(page, checked Oct 15, 2026)
Lilisity’s independent report
What the public record shows
Gathered by Lilisity from state and federal sources. Communities can’t edit this part of the page.
State inspections
Last inspection: Apr 16, 2025. See the record
License
Active, 61 residents
Residential Care Facility 50R504.
Nearest emergency room
1.4 miles
Legacy Mount Hood Medical Center, rated 3 of 5 stars by CMS.
Side by side with nearby communities
The 4 nearest communities that offer assisted living, by straight-line distance. Prices are starting prices each community publishes; we never show estimates.
| Community | Distance | Licensed capacity | Published starting price | License | Inspection citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kelly Gardens Residential Care this community | 61 | Not published | Active | 13 deficiencies, 26 violations | |
| Adara Oaks Living | 0.1 mi | 60 | Not published | Active | 11 deficiencies, 13 violations |
| Avamere at Chestnut Lane | 0.3 mi | 78 | $7,889/mo | Active | 14 deficiencies, 36 violations |
| Liberty Pointe | 0.3 mi | 55 | Not published | Active | 11 deficiencies, 10 violations |
| Prestige Senior Living Huntington Terrace | 0.4 mi | 75 | Not published | Active | 2 deficiencies, 10 violations |
State inspection record13 deficiencies, 26 violations
- Last inspection
- April 16, 2025
- Inspections
- 4, 13 deficiencies cited
- Substantiated abuse
- 6
- Substantiated licensing violations
- 20
- Regulatory actions
- 1
- Fines assessed
- $4,951.00 (6 violations)
- Current owner since
- June 1, 2023
License conditions and other regulatory actions
- September 16, 2025 to November 13, 2025: License Condition, Failed to provide safe environment RCFCD25-01036; 2 incidents: CALMS - 00088081, CALMS - 00087830
The facility failed to exercise reasonable precautions against any condition that may threaten the health, safety, or welfare of residents in accordance with OAR 411-054-0025(4); per a complaint the elevator at the facility has not been working resulting in residents from upper floors not having access to the lower floors, and a resident smoking in their room.
Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration); 411-054-0030 (Resident Services)
Inspections
- April 16, 2025: Change of Owner, 3 deficiencies cited report
- C0305: Systems: Resident Right to Refuse severity level 2, scope L2 Pattern
- C0363: Acuity Based Staffing Tool - Updates & Staffing Plan severity level 2, scope L2 Widespread
- C0455: Inspections and Investigation: Insp Interval severity level 2, scope L2 Widespread
- C0510: General Building Exterior severity level 2, scope L2 Widespread
- April 8, 2025: Complaint Investig., 3 deficiencies cited report
- C0360: Staffing Requirements and Training: Staffing severity level 2, scope L2 Widespread
- C0362: Acuity Based Staffing Tool - Abst Time severity level 2, scope L2 Widespread
- C0363: Acuity Based Staffing Tool - Updates & Plan severity level 2, scope L2 Widespread
- December 5, 2023: State Licensure, 0 deficiencies cited report
- C0000: Comment severity level 0
- July 18, 2022: Initial Licensure, 7 deficiencies cited report
- C0000: Comment severity level 0
- C0310: Systems: Medication Administration severity level 2, scope L2 Isolated, corrected January 26, 2023
- C0330: Systems: Psychotropic Medication severity level 2, scope L2 Isolated, corrected January 26, 2023
- C0361: Acuity-Based Staffing Tool severity level 2, scope L2 Widespread, corrected September 18, 2022
- C0372: Training Within 30 Days: Direct Care Staff severity level 2, scope L2 Pattern, corrected January 26, 2023
Show all 10
- C0455: Inspections and Investigation: Insp Interval severity level 2, scope L2 Pattern, corrected January 26, 2023
- C0555: Call Sys, Exit Dr Alarm, Phones, Tv, Or Cable severity level 2, scope L2 Widespread, corrected September 18, 2022
- Z0142: Administration Compliance severity level 2, scope L2 Widespread, corrected January 26, 2023
- Z0155: Staff Training Requirements severity level 2, scope L2 Pattern, corrected January 26, 2023
- Z0162: Compliance With Rules Health Care severity level 2, scope L2 Isolated, corrected January 26, 2023
Substantiated abuse or neglect
- October 8, 2024: Failed to properly plan care Abuse: Neglect; Level 3 - Moderate harm or potential for serious harm; fine $500.00; report
Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration); 411-054-0027 (Resident Rights and Protections); 411-054-0028 (Reporting and Investigating Abuse and Other Actions Affecting Resident Welfare); 411-054-0036 (Service Plan – General)State’s findings
The facility failed to provide appropriate services according to the Alleged Victim’s (AV) care needs when AV took smoke breaks outside. Based on facility documentation and interviews, facility staff are instructed to escort AV to and from his/her smoke breaks and to check on AV every ten minutes while AV is outside or to remain directly with AV while AV is smoking. It was determined that the facility failed to provide clear direction regarding the delivery of AV's services, which resulted in AV being continually left outside for extended periods of time during inclement weather conditions between October 8, 2024, and October 25, 2024. The facility failed to provide appropriate training and oversight to ensure staff do not leave Alleged Victim (AV) outside for prolonged periods of time, resulting in AV's unreasonable discomfort due to exposure to inclement weather conditions, emotional harm due to feelings of being forgotten causing anxiety and panic, and serious loss of person dignity. The facility's failure is a moderate violation of resident rights, is considered neglect of care, and constitutes abuse.
- September 17, 2024: Failed to provide a safe medication administration system Abuse: Neglect; Level 3 - Moderate harm or potential for serious harm; fine $1,013.00; report
Rules: 411-054-0027 (Resident Rights and Protections); 411-054-0028 (Reporting and Investigating Abuse and Other Actions Affecting Resident Welfare); 411-054-0055 (Medications and Treatments)State’s findings
Alleged Victim (AV) is under the care of the facility and AV is care planned for pain medication management. On September 15, 2024, September 16, 2024, and September 17, 2024, AV suffered an increased in pain due to the facility not reordering AV's narcotic pain medication in a timely manner. Based on facility documentation and interviews, staff were pulling AV's narcotic pain medications from incorrect cards which caused staff to not accurately track when AV's narcotic pain medication needed to be reordered to ensure availability. The facility's failure to provide a safe medication administration system to ensure AV's narcotic pain medications were administered as ordered. The failure resulted in AV experiencing pain lasting more than 24 hours, causing unnecessary unreasonable discomfort, which is a violation of resident rights, is considered neglect of care and constitutes abuse.
- April 4, 2024: Failed to provide safe environment Abuse: Neglect; Level 4 - Serious harm, death, imminent danger or chronic regulatory noncompliance; fine $2,500.00; report
Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration); 411-054-0027 (Resident Rights and Protections); 411-054-0028 (Reporting and Investigating Abuse and Other Actions Affecting Resident Welfare); 411-054-0030 (Resident Services); 411-054-0036 (Service Plan – General)State’s findings
The Alleged Victim (AV) is a resident of the facility and receives care due to short-term memory loss, which places AV at risk of harm because of difficulty recalling information and susceptibility to manipulation. Alleged Perpetrator 2 (AP2), employed as a caregiver at the facility, entered into an inappropriate and prohibited relationship with AV. AP2 was discovered in AV’s bed by a member of facility management and was immediately suspended. During the internal investigation, both AV and AP2 denied any inappropriate relationship. AP2 was later reinstated but restricted from working on AV’s floor or providing care to AV. Despite these restrictions, AP2 continued visiting AV’s room and maintained communication via text messages. While AV was hospitalized between March 16, 2024, and March 27, 2024, AP2 disclosed to Alleged Perpetrator 3 (AP3) that AP2 had “kissed” AV. Between February 13, 2024, and April 2, 2024, AP2 engaged in a texting relationship with AV that included: sexual photos and explicit language; use of pet names and inappropriate emojis; and manipulative language when AV did not respond. When AV stopped responding, AP2 continued sending inappropriate messages. AV was initially reluctant to discuss the relationship but later disclosed that it was intimate, both physically and emotionally, and expressed that AP2 was “playing mind games.” AV stated he/she ended the relationship when he/she no longer wished to continue. Although the facility provides mandatory reporting training and all interviewed staff confirmed completion, multiple staff members were aware of and uncomfortable with AP2’s actions yet failed to report or adequately follow up. This indicates that the training was insufficient to ensure timely intervention and prevention of inappropriate conduct. AP2's actions caused AV significant emotional harm. AP2's actions is considered sexual abuse. The facility’s failure to properly monitor AP2 while caring for residents and failing to train staff on proper mandatory reporting guidelines resulting in sexual abuse by AP2 is a violation of resident rights is considered neglect of care and constitutes abuse. Given AV’s cognitive impairment and the inherent power imbalance between resident and caregiver, this situation presents an elevated risk of further harm. Alleged Perpetrator 3 (AP3) failed to follow mandatory reporting requirements when informed of inappropriate intimate physical contact made by AP2 towards AV, resulting in ongoing sexual abuse by AP2. AP3's action is considered neglect of care which constitutes abuse. Alleged Perpetrator 4 (AP4) and Alleged Perpetrator 5 (AP5) allegedly neglected AV. An investigation determined no abuse occurred by AP4 and AP5.
- February 27, 2024: Failed to provide a safe medication administration system Abuse: Neglect; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; fine $250.00; report
Rules: 411-054-0027 (Resident Rights and Protections); 411-054-0028 (Reporting and Investigating Abuse and Other Actions Affecting Resident Welfare); 411-054-0055 (Medications and Treatments)State’s findings
On or about February 27, 2024, the facility failed to provide a safe medication administration system to ensure the Alleged Victim’s (AV) medications were administered as ordered. The failure resulted in unreasonable discomfort, which is a violation of resident rights, is considered neglect of care and constitutes abuse. Alleged Perpetrator 2 (AP2) allegedly neglected AV. An investigation determined no abuse occurred by AP2.
- December 11, 2023: Failed to meet the scheduled and unscheduled needs of residents Abuse: Neglect; Level 3 - Moderate harm or potential for serious harm; fine $500.00; report
Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration); 411-054-0027 (Resident Rights and Protections); 411-054-0028 (Reporting and Investigating Abuse and Other Actions Affecting Resident Welfare); 411-054-0030 (Resident Services); 411-054-0036 (Service Plan – General); 411-054-0037 (Acuity-Based Staffing Tool)State’s findings
During the overnight shift of December 11, 2023, Alleged Victim (AV) pushed AV's call button several times, to request support with his/her Activities of Daily Living for night care as care planned. AV needed transfer assistance with incontinence care and to smoke a cigarette, PRN medication to manage his/her pain, and a drink of water for relief to quench thirst. As a result of facility's staffing levels not being sufficient at the time of incident, AV soiled his/her bed and was left in his/her soiled bed "all night". Based on facility documentation and interviews, the facility was unable to provide evidence as requested for investigation to show staffing levels at time of incident were sufficient to meet the scheduled and unscheduled needs of residents. The facility is licensed for 61 beds. During the overnight shift of December 11, 2023, when this incident occurred, there were only three staff taking care of the entire facility needs. At time of incident, AV was care planned as a two-person assist in a Hoyer lift. The facility's failure to provide adequate staffing support, resulted serious emotional harm due to staff not being able to adequately address AV's nighttime support needs and requests. Alleged Perpetrator 2 (AP2) allegedly neglected AV at time of incident. An investigation inconclusively determined no licensing violation or abuse occurred by AP2.
- April 20, 2023: Failed to provide safe environment Abuse: Neglect; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; fine $188.00; report
State’s findings
The facility failed to provide appropriate supervision to the Alleged Victim (AV) according to his/her needs. The failure resulted in AV eloping the secured building, without staff knowledge, placing him/her at risk of harm, which is a violation of resident rights, is considered neglect of care and constitutes abuse.
Substantiated licensing violations
- February 18, 2026: Failed to provide a safe medication administration system Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
Rules: 411-054-0055 (Medications and Treatments)State’s findings
On or about February 18, 2026, the facility failed to ensure Medication and treatment orders were carried out as prescribed. The facility's failure is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.
- February 18, 2026: Failed to use an ABST Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
Rules: 411-054-0037 (Acuity-Based Staffing Tool)State’s findings
The facility failed to have an updated Acuity-Based Staffing Tool (ABST) that accurately reflected the resident population and their care needs. Inconsistencies were identified between the resident roster, care plans, and the data entered into the ABST. An investigation determined this is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.
- January 16, 2026: Failed to use an ABST Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
Rules: 411-054-0037 (Acuity-Based Staffing Tool)State’s findings
Based on interview and record review, conducted during an investigation on 07/08/26, the facility’s failure to complete or update and review the Acuity-Based Staffing Tool (ABST) evaluation for each resident quarterly as required was substantiated. Findings include, but are not limited to: The facility’s census was 31. A review of the facility’s last ABST evaluation update per resident indicated 15 of 31 residents had not been updated quarterly as required as of 01/16/26. The facility failed to have an updated Acuity-Based Staffing Tool (ABST) that accurately reflected the resident population and their care needs. Inconsistencies were identified between the resident roster, care plans, and the data entered into the ABST. An investigation determined this is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.
- October 15, 2025: Failed to use an ABST Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
Rules: 411-054-0037 (Acuity-Based Staffing Tool)State’s findings
The facility failed to have an updated Acuity-Based Staffing Tool (ABST) that accurately reflected the resident population and their care needs. Inconsistencies were identified between the resident roster, care plans, and the data entered into the ABST. An investigation determined this is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.
- September 5, 2025: Failed to provide safe environment Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
Rules: 411-054-0105 (Inspections and Investigations)State’s findings
The facility failed to provide records to the Department upon request. The facility's failure is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.
Show all 20
- June 27, 2025: Failed to use an ABST Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
Rules: 411-054-0037 (Acuity-Based Staffing Tool)State’s findings
The facility failed to have an updated Acuity-Based Staffing Tool (ABST) that accurately reflected the resident population and their care needs. Inconsistencies were identified between the resident roster, care plans, and the data entered into the ABST. An investigation determined this is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.
- June 24, 2025: Failed to use an ABST Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
Rules: 411-054-0037 (Acuity-Based Staffing Tool)State’s findings
The facility failed to have an updated Acuity-Based Staffing Tool (ABST) that accurately reflected the resident population and their care needs. Inconsistencies were identified between the resident roster, care plans, and the data entered into the ABST. An investigation determined this is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.
- June 16, 2025: Failed to use an ABST Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
Rules: 411-054-0037 (Acuity-Based Staffing Tool)State’s findings
On or about June 16, 2025, the facility failed to have an updated Acuity-Based Staffing Tool (ABST) that accurately reflected the resident population and their care needs. Inconsistencies were identified between the resident roster, care plans, and the data entered into the ABST. An investigation determined this is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.
- May 27, 2025: Failed to use an ABST Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
Rules: 411-054-0037 (Acuity-Based Staffing Tool)State’s findings
The facility failed to have an updated Acuity-Based Staffing Tool (ABST) that accurately reflected the resident population and their care needs. Inconsistencies were identified between the resident roster, care plans, and the data entered into the ABST. An investigation determined this is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.
- April 29, 2025: Failed to use an ABST Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration); 411-054-0037 (Acuity-Based Staffing Tool)State’s findings
Based on interview and record review, conducted during a site visit on 05/05/25, the facility's failure to fully implement and maintain an acuity-based staffing tool (ABST) was substantiated for 1 of 1 resident (# 2). Findings include but are not limited to: A review of Resident 2's service plan, dated 02/26/25, and progress notes, dated 04/04/25 – 05/05/25, indicated resident had been placed on two-hour checks. A review of resident’s ABST profile did not indicate any time allotted to resident safety checks. In an interview on 04/08/25, Staff 1 stated Resident 2 had been placed on safety/wellness checks recently for suicidal ideations and the passing of a friend. The facility’s posted staffing plan and ABST were reviewed and compared with the facility’s staff schedule from 04/28/25 – 05/04/25 which indicated the facility was not consistently staffed to the posted staffing plan by at least one care staff for seven of 42 shifts reviewed. A review of facility’s ODHS ABST indicated six residents' evaluations had not been updated quarterly, as required. The facility failed to fully update the residents' ABST evaluations no less than quarterly, failed to accurately capture care time and care elements that staff are providing to each resident; and failed to provide direct care staff sufficient in number to meet the unscheduled needs of each resident. Findings were reviewed with and acknowledged by Staff 1, and Staff 4. The facility failure is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules. Corrective Action has been taken.
- April 8, 2025: Failed to meet the scheduled and unscheduled needs of residents Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
Rules: 411-054-0070 (Staffing Requirements and Training)State’s findings
The facility failed to have sufficient staff to meet the scheduled and unscheduled needs of the residents. It was determined the lack of staff is leading to needs not being met or taking extended periods of time to be met. Facility is not currently staffing to the levels as indicated by the Specific Needs Contract to meet the scheduled and unscheduled needs of residents. An investigation determined this is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.
- March 28, 2025: Failed to use an ABST Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
Rules: 411-054-0037 (Acuity-Based Staffing Tool)State’s findings
The facility failed to have an updated Acuity-Based Staffing Tool (ABST) that accurately reflected the resident population and their care needs. Inconsistencies were identified between the resident roster, care plans, and the data entered into the ABST. An investigation determined this is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.
- March 14, 2025: Failed to answer call light in a timely manner Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration); 411-054-0200 (Residential Care Facility Building Requirements)State’s findings
Based on observation, interview, and record review, conducted during a site visit on 04/08/25, the facility’s failure to provide a call system that connects resident units to the care staff center or staff pagers was substantiated for 2 of 2 sampled residents (#s 1 and 2). Findings include but are not limited to: Staff 1 stated residents have pull cords and most have pendants that connect to the facility’s call system. Staff have cell phones and use the call system’s application to respond to call lights. Staff 4 stated when the facility’s internet was down, the call system didn’t work. When residents used the call system, an alert displayed on staff’s devices. Residents have tested their call light with Staff 4, and Staff 4 didn’t receive an alert on his/her device. Staff 5 stated when s/he was working, sometimes s/he didn’t receive alerts for the call system on his/her device. Resident 1’s call light was pressed at approximately 1:49 pm. At approximately 2:05 pm, multiple direct care staff members were observed walking past Resident 1’s door without responding to the call light. Staff 5 was asked about active alerts. Staff 5 opened his/her device, and the following alerts were displayed: -At 2:13 pm, the application displayed a “new alert” approximately 24 minutes prior; -A “re-alert” approximately 22 minutes prior; -A “re-alert” approximately 20 minutes prior; -A “re-alert” approximately 18 minutes prior; and - “Alert completed” approximately 16 minutes prior for Resident 1’s room. There was no caregiver observed entering Resident 1’s room to check on him/her during the time the alert was active and when the alert was completed. Resident 2’s call light was pressed at approximately 2:26 pm. At 2:46 pm, no staff member had responded to the call light. Staff 6 was asked about active alerts. Staff 6 opened his/her device and there was no active call listed on the staff’s device. Staff 1 was asked about the alerts for Residents 1 and 2. When Staff 1 reviewed the call light system, no alerts displayed for Residents 1 or 2 for that day. It was determined the facility’s failure to provide a call system that connects resident units to the care staff center or staff pagers was substantiated for Residents 1 and 2. The findings of the investigation were reviewed with and acknowledged by Staff 1, Staff 2, and Staff 3 via phone.
- March 14, 2025: Failed to use an ABST Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration); 411-054-0037 (Acuity-Based Staffing Tool)State’s findings
Based on interview and record review, conducted during a site visit on 04/08/25, the facility’s failure to consistently have qualified direct care staff, sufficient in number to meet the 24-hour scheduled an unscheduled need of each resident was substantiated. Findings include but are not limited to: Staff 1 stated the facility utilized the ODHS ABST, and the census was 38. There were two residents who were not updated quarterly in the ABST. The facility's specific needs contract, dated 06/07/24, indicated when the facility was at full capacity for specific needs contract residents, which was 36 residents, the facility was required to staff a minimum of 12 direct care staff on day and swing shifts, and a minimum of seven direct care staff on night shift. The facility’s posted staffing plan indicated there were two med techs and six caregivers scheduled for day and swing shifts, and one med tech and four caregivers for night shift. The posted staffing plan did not account for the facility's specific needs contract. A review of the facility’s staff schedule, dated 03/08/25 through 03/14/25, indicated the facility was not staffing according to their posted staffing plan for 12 of 21 reviewed shifts, or 57.14% of the shifts reviewed. Of the 21 reviewed shifts, the facility was not staffing to their specific needs contract 100% of the time. The facility’s failure to consistently have qualified direct care staff, sufficient in number to meet the 24-hour scheduled an unscheduled need of each resident was substantiated. ?The findings of the investigation were reviewed with and acknowledged by Staff 1, Staff 2, and Staff 3 via phone. The facility's failure is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules. Corrective Action has been taken.
- March 10, 2025: Failed to staff as indicated by ABST Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
Rules: 411-054-0037 (Acuity-Based Staffing Tool)State’s findings
On or about March 10, 2025, the facility failed to consistently staff to the levels, intensity and qualifications indicated by the Acuity-Based Staffing Tool (ABST). Inconsistencies were identified between the staffing schedule and the data produced by the ABST. Facility was not staffing to the levels as indicated by the ABST to meet the scheduled and unscheduled needs of residents. An investigation determined this is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules. Corrective Action taken on related allegation; RCFCD25-00835.
- November 7, 2024: Failed to cooperate with an investigation Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
Rules: 411-054-0105 (Inspections and Investigations)State’s findings
Based on interview and record review, conducted during an investigation on 01/26/26, the facility’s failure to provide records to the Department upon request was substantiated. Findings include but are not limited to: A review of electronic communication, dated 11/07/24, indicated the Department requested documents related to the facility’s Acuity-Based Staffing Tool (ABST) alleged event date 10/30/24. The facility had not provided all requested documentation by the due date of 11/08/24. The findings were reviewed with and acknowledged by Staff 1 on 02/11/26. The facility’s failure to provide records to the Department is a licensing violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.
- October 16, 2024: Failed to submit timely or adequate staffing documentation Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
Rules: 411-054-0105 (Inspections and Investigations)State’s findings
Based on interview and record review, conducted during an investigation on 01/23/26, the facility’s failure to provide records to the Department upon request was substantiated. Findings include, but are not limited to: A review of electronic communication, dated 10/15/24, indicated the Department requested documents related to the facility’s Acuity-Based Staffing Tool (ABST) alleged event date 09/16/24. The facility had not provided all requested documentation by the due date of 10/16/24. The facility's failure to provide records to the Department upon request is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.
- September 2, 2024: Failed to provide a safe medication administration system Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration); 411-054-0055 (Medications and Treatments)State’s findings
Between September 2, 2024, and September 4, 2024, Alleged Victim (AV) was not administered his/her laxative medication as order. AV did not experience a risk of harm from missing a few doses of his/her laxative medication. However, the facility failed to provide a safe medication administration system which is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules. Alleged Perpetrator 2 (AP2) and Alleged Perpetrator 3 (AP3) allegedly neglected AV. An investigation determined no abuse occurred by AP2 and AP3.
- October 20, 2023: Failed to provide safe environment Licensing Violation; Level 3 - Moderate harm or potential for serious harm; report
Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration)State’s findings
On October 20, 2023, Alleged Perpetrator 2 (AP2), assisted Alleged Victim (AV) from AV's bed to AV's recliner chair. AP2 was unable to complete the transfer so AV was lowered to the floor and AV's ankle twisted on the way down. AV agreed to go to the hospital on October 24, 2023, for treatment after experiencing ongoing pain and discomfort. AV was diagnosed with a fracture of AV's left foot. Based on facility documentation and interviews, AV is a two-person transfer and AP2 understood the requirement; however, assisted AV independently. AP2's actions is considered neglect of care which constitutes abuse. The facility failed to provide a safe environment for AV which is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.
- July 22, 2022: Failed to use an ABST Licensing Violation; Level 3 - Moderate harm or potential for serious harm; report
Rules: 411-054-0037 (Acuity-Based Staffing Tool)State’s findings
There was no documented evidence the facility was using an ABST which would determine a staffing plan reflective to meet the 24-hour scheduled and unscheduled needs of residents. On July 18, 2022, Staff 1 reported the facility had not implemented an ABST. Staff 1 stated he/she would follow up to ensure the ABST was implemented as required. On 08/1/2022 Survey confirmed all information was entered into ABST and will check that information against service plans at revisit.
Read the full record on the state’s site →
ODHS lists only substantiated violations: “either a substantiated instance of abuse or a licensing violation. Open investigations and complaints that are being appealed by the provider are not listed.” Oregon counts neglect as a form of abuse; see the state’s definitions of abuse. Each violation shows the level ODHS gives it, in the state’s words (for example “2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm”), and any fine ODHS assessed. Inspection citations show the state’s severity level and scope, and the date ODHS recorded the problem as corrected when it lists one. Rule names come from the Oregon Administrative Rules. ODHS: “Formal regulatory actions can range from a condition placed upon a license due to non-compliance or a notice to revoke a license.” This community is licensed for 61 residents; larger communities are inspected and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Oregon Department of Human Services, Long-Term Care Licensing, data as of October 15, 2026, showing the last five years. Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.
License and ownershipActive license
- License type
- Residential Care Facility
- License number
- 50R504
- License status
- Active
- Licensed capacity
- 61
- County
- Multnomah County
Source: Oregon state licensing records (agency listing), retrieved 2026-09-09. Licensing status is a matter of public record; it is not a quality rating.
Paying with Medicaid and other programsOn the Oregon list of Medicaid providers (2026)
On the Oregon list of Medicaid providers. Listed as Kelly Gardens Residential Care under Accepts Medicaid (ODHS licensing record). (state list, as of Sep 9, 2026)
Being on the list means the community has taken part in the program. Ask whether it has a Medicaid opening now, and how many residents it serves on Medicaid.
Staff pay and workplace safety1 OSHA inspection, 3 violations cited
Federal records about how the employer here treats its staff.
OSHA workplace safety inspections
OSHA inspects workplaces for staff safety, such as lifting, needles, chemicals and workplace violence. It does not inspect resident care.
- Jul 18, 2025: programmed (planned) inspection, complete (safety). Case closed Jul 18, 2026. 3 violations cited (3 other). Penalties: $300 proposed, $300 now. OSHA record. OSHA recorded the employer as 317741253 - Ohana Garden City Operations LLC. Matched by street address; the name OSHA recorded differs from the community's.
Details
- Other than serious: Electrical equipment and installation (1910.303(g)(1)(ii)). Penalty $0 proposed, $0 now. To be fixed by Oct 30, 2025.
- Other than serious: Cited rule OAR. Penalty $100 proposed, $100 now. To be fixed by Oct 30, 2025.
- Other than serious: Cited rule OAR. Penalty $200 proposed, $200 now. To be fixed by Oct 30, 2025.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor OSHA enforcement data, as of Oct 15, 2026, inspections since 2016. Penalties can change while a case is open or contested.
Location and nearby careNearest hospital 1.4 mi, nursing home 0.2 mi, pharmacy 0.1 mi
- Nearest hospital with an emergency room
- Legacy Mount Hood Medical Center, Gresham. 1.4 miles away, straight line. CMS overall hospital rating: 3 of 5 stars.
- Nearest Medicare nursing home
- Gresham Post Acute Care and Rehabilitation, Gresham. 0.2 miles away, straight line.
- Nearest home health agency office
- Nightingale Home Health, Portland. 5.8 miles away, straight line. Agencies travel to clients, so ask which ones serve this address.
- Nearest pharmacy
- East County Pharmacy. 0.1 miles away, straight line. From OpenStreetMap, which does not list every pharmacy, so one may be closer.
- Area
- USDA classes ZIP code 97030 as metropolitan (metropolitan core).
- Dialysis within 15 miles
- Usrc Gresham Dialysis, Gresham, 0.5 miles away, straight line (has a shift starting after 5 pm; CMS rating 2 of 5 stars)
Davita Gresham Station Dialysis, Gresham, 0.9 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 3 of 5 stars)
Fmc Dialysis Mt Hood, Gresham, 1.1 miles away, straight line (has a shift starting after 5 pm; CMS rating 3 of 5 stars) - Hospice
- 28 Medicare hospices tell CMS they serve ZIP code 97030.
Pinnacle Hospice Care Of Portland, office in Portland, 6.3 miles away, straight line
Adventist Health Hospice, office in Portland, 6.7 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 3 of 5 stars)
Agape Hospice Nw, office in Clackamas, 8.1 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 1 of 5 stars) - Nearest geriatric medicine practice
- The Vancouver Clinic Inc Ps, Gresham. 0.6 miles away, straight line. 1 geriatric medicine doctor listed there.
Distances are straight lines from the community, not driving distance. Hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors come from CMS provider data (CMS, hospital list updated Jul 22, 2026). Star ratings are CMS’s own.
Emergency and natural hazard riskFEMA overall risk relatively high; outside FEMA's high-risk flood areas
Public hazard maps for this location. Ask the community about its emergency plan, its generator and where residents would go in an evacuation.
- Flood zone
- Outside the high and moderate risk flood areas on FEMA's flood map (Zone X, minimal flood hazard, or not studied). (FEMA flood map)
- FEMA National Risk Index
- Overall: relatively high. By hazard: inland flooding relatively moderate, wildfire very low, tornado very low, heat wave relatively moderate, earthquake very high. These are FEMA’s ratings for the census tract, compared with tracts nationwide. (FEMA, December 2025)
A flood zone describes the map at this point, not the building's elevation. In an emergency, follow the local emergency management agency.
Questions to ask on a tour10 questions picked for this community from its record
Picked for this community from its record. Ask them in person and write down the answers.
- The state recorded a finding in February 2026. What was it, and how was it fixed?
- What does the base rate include, and when did rates last go up?
- How many caregivers are on duty during the day and at night?
- What happens if care needs increase? When would someone need to move?
- What fees are charged at move-in?
- How do you tell families about falls, illness or changes?
- How long have the executive director and the head of care been here?
- Who gives medications, and what training do they have?
- For what reasons can a resident be asked to leave?
- Is the apartment held during a hospital stay, and at what cost?
What we checked13 public sources we searched, with dates
Every public source we searched for this community. “Nothing on record” means we found no record that matched it. A record can be missed when a name or address differs.
| Source | Data as of | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Oregon Department of Human Services, Long-Term Care Licensing inspection records | Oct 15, 2026 | See above |
| Oregon Medicaid provider list | Sep 9, 2026 | See above |
| U.S. Department of Labor wage and hour cases | Oct 15, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| OSHA workplace safety inspections since 2016 | Oct 15, 2026 | See above |
| FEMA flood map | See above | |
| USDA wildfire risk | Apr 15, 2026 | Not shown: FEMA rates wildfire risk here very low |
| FEMA National Risk Index | See above | |
| CMS hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors; OpenStreetMap pharmacies | See above | |
| HUD Multifamily Properties - Assisted | Jul 6, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| State Veterans Homes (NASVH directory) | Sep 20, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| CMS Hospice - General Information | Aug 19, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| CMS Home Health Care Agencies | May 27, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| The community’s own website | See above |
Common questionsAnswers to 4 questions families ask
What type of care does Kelly Gardens Residential Care provide?
Kelly Gardens Residential Care is licensed by the state of Oregon for assisted living in Gresham, Oregon. Its licensed capacity is 61 residents.
Does Lilisity rate Kelly Gardens Residential Care?
No. We publish state licensing details for Kelly Gardens Residential Care but no score, rating, or ranking. Only communities on the Top Communities list or with a Senior Living Alliance Excellence Award, both based on phone-verified resident and family interviews, are ranked.
How much does Kelly Gardens Residential Care cost?
Assisted Living in Oregon typically starts at $4,600 to $5,800 a month. Based on 108 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price. Kelly Gardens Residential Care does not publish its prices.
How do I contact Kelly Gardens Residential Care?
Use Kelly Gardens Residential Care's website, kellygardensresidential.com, or visit at 813 Ne Kelly Ave, Gresham, OR 97030.
How Lilisity works. The only scores or rankings Lilisity publishes are the Top Communities list and the Excellence Awards, both built from phone-verified resident and family interviews. Communities can pay Lilisity a flat monthly fee to manage their own listing: photos, prices, contact details, and receiving the inquiries families choose to send them. The fee is the same no matter how many families contact them or move in. Senior Living Alliance, which runs Lilisity, offers the same listing to its member communities as part of their membership; members pay SLA for its resident and family interview program. No community pays Lilisity per inquiry, per referral or per move-in. Payment never changes a testimonial, a rating, or the order of search results. The "Nearby Senior Living Alliance communities" box shows member communities only. How we verify testimonials · How we are paid