Assisted Living
Avamere at Chestnut Lane
1219 Ne 6th Street, Gresham, OR 97030 · Map
Licensed for 78 residents
Avamere at Chestnut Lane is a state-licensed assisted living community in Gresham, Oregon. It is licensed for 78 residents. Lilisity publishes no score or ranking for this community; the details below come from the state licensing record.
Prices
Starting prices the community publishes, with the date we checked each one and a link to where it is published. Care charges are usually added after an assessment.
| Care | Starting at | Checked |
|---|---|---|
| Assisted Living | $7,889 /mo | Oct 12, 2026 |
Area costs
Care and services
From the community’s website
What Avamere at Chestnut Lane says about itself, quoted from its own site. We have not checked these claims against licensing records. Ask about each one on a tour.
- Provides transportation.
In-house transportation
(page, checked Oct 12, 2026) - Staff speak American Sign Language.
All staff communicate through American Sign Language (ASL), creating a warm and inviting culture where our residents feel understood.
(page, checked Oct 15, 2026) - Community fee: charged.
Community fee $3,000 1-time
(page, checked Oct 12, 2026)
Lilisity’s independent report
What the public record shows
Gathered by Lilisity from state and federal sources. Communities can’t edit this part of the page.
State inspections
Last inspection: Aug 19, 2024. See the record
License
Active, 78 residents
Assisted Living Facility 70A290.
Nearest emergency room
1.3 miles
Legacy Mount Hood Medical Center, rated 3 of 5 stars by CMS.
Side by side with nearby communities
The 4 nearest communities that offer assisted living, by straight-line distance. Prices are starting prices each community publishes; we never show estimates.
| Community | Distance | Licensed capacity | Published starting price | License | Inspection citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avamere at Chestnut Lane this community | 78 | $7,889/mo | Active | 14 deficiencies, 36 violations | |
| Liberty Pointe | 0.0 mi | 55 | Not published | Active | 11 deficiencies, 10 violations |
| Adara Oaks Living | 0.2 mi | 60 | Not published | Active | 11 deficiencies, 13 violations |
| Kelly Gardens Residential Care | 0.3 mi | 61 | Not published | Active | 13 deficiencies, 26 violations |
| Prestige Senior Living Huntington Terrace | 0.4 mi | 75 | Not published | Active | 2 deficiencies, 10 violations |
State inspection record14 deficiencies, 36 violations
- Last inspection
- August 19, 2024
- Inspections
- 4, 14 deficiencies cited
- Substantiated abuse
- 11
- Substantiated licensing violations
- 25
- Regulatory actions
- 1
- Fines assessed
- $9,125.00 (11 violations)
License conditions and other regulatory actions
- August 29, 2023 to April 26, 2024: License Condition, Failed to use an ABST ALFCD23-00562; incident: CALMS - 00045910
The facility failed to ensure resident ABST entries were reflective of resident care needs and were updated quarterly.
Rules: 411-054-0037 (Acuity-Based Staffing Tool)
Inspections
- August 19, 2024: Complaint Investig., 1 deficiency cited report
- C0010: Licensing Complaint Investigation severity level 0
- C0303: Systems: Treatment Orders severity level 2, scope L2 Isolated
- May 28, 2024: State Licensure, 1 deficiency cited report
- C0000: Comment severity level 0
- C0240: Resident Services Meals, Food Sanitation Rule severity level 2, scope L2 Widespread, corrected July 27, 2024
- February 12, 2024: Complaint Investig., 2 deficiencies cited report
- C0360: Staffing Requirements and Training: Staffing severity level 2, scope L2 Pattern
- C0372: Training Within 30 Days: Direct Care Staff severity level 2, scope L2 Pattern
- July 17, 2023: Validation, 10 deficiencies cited report
- C0000: Comment severity level 0
- C0252: Resident Move-In and Eval: Res Evaluation severity level 2, scope L2 Isolated, corrected September 17, 2023
- C0260: Service Plan: General severity level 2, scope L2 Pattern, corrected September 17, 2023
- C0270: Change of Condition and Monitoring severity level 2, scope L2 Isolated, corrected September 17, 2023
- C0303: Systems: Treatment Orders severity level 3, scope L3 Isolated, corrected April 6, 2024
Show all 12
- C0310: Systems: Medication Administration severity level 2, scope L2 Pattern, corrected September 17, 2023
- C0330: Systems: Psychotropic Medication severity level 2, scope L2 Isolated, corrected September 17, 2023
- C0340: Restraints and Supportive Devices severity level 2, scope L2 Isolated, corrected September 17, 2023
- C0361: Acuity-Based Staffing Tool severity level 2, scope L2 Pattern, corrected September 17, 2023
- C0420: Fire and Life Safety: Safety severity level 2, scope L2 Widespread, corrected September 21, 2023
- C0455: Inspections and Investigation: Insp Interval severity level 2, scope L2 Widespread, corrected April 6, 2024
- C0613: General Building: Doors-Walls, Cleanable severity level 2, scope L2 Widespread, corrected April 6, 2024
Substantiated abuse or neglect
- September 5, 2025: Failed to properly plan care Abuse: Neglect; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; fine $250.00; report
Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration); 411-054-0027 (Resident Rights and Protections); 411-054-0028 (Reporting and Investigating Abuse and Other Actions Affecting Resident Welfare); 411-054-0036 (Service Plan – General); 411-054-0040 (Change of Condition and Monitoring)State’s findings
Alleged Victim (AV) returned to the facility on September 3, 2025, after a hospital stay with a diagnosis of “failure to thrive.” Due to AV’s change in condition, staff were required to deliver meals to AV’s apartment, place them within AV’s reach, and provide cuing to eat. On the afternoon of September 5, 2025, AV’s breakfast and lunch trays were found in AV’s room untouched, still covered, and positioned out of AV’s reach. Based on facility documentation and interviews, staff working with AV at time of incident were not aware of AV’s need for meal setup and cuing. When staff made AV’s food accessible and provided cuing, AV began eating. The facility's failure to provide adequate oversight and training of staff to ensure AV was receiving necessary meal support, resulted in unreasonable discomfort when AV was not able to eat meals which were left in AV's room. The facility failed to properly care plan for AV's care needs which resulted in unreasonable discomfort and physical harm to AV, which is a violation of resident rights, is considered neglect of care which constitutes abuse, as defined by OAR 411-020-0002(1)(b)(A)(i).
- July 16, 2025: Failed to properly plan care Abuse: Neglect; Level 3 - Moderate harm or potential for serious harm; fine $1,125.00; report
Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration); 411-054-0027 (Resident Rights and Protections); 411-054-0028 (Reporting and Investigating Abuse and Other Actions Affecting Resident Welfare); 411-054-0036 (Service Plan – General); 411-054-0040 (Change of Condition and Monitoring)State’s findings
On or about July 16, 2025, the Alleged Victim (AV) was transported to the hospital due to unexplained bruising on the backs of the thighs and an elevated blood sugar reading. Hospital staff later reported that imaging revealed AV had a fractured pelvis. The attending physician estimated that the injury likely occurred within the previous three days. The facility’s internal investigation determined that multiple caregivers observed bruising between the night of July 14, 2025, and July 16, 2025; however, none of the staff reported or documented the bruising to facility nursing staff or management. Prior to being transported to the hospital on July 16, documentation indicated that AV’s pain level appeared to be “10/10,” as AV was reportedly screaming during assessment of the legs. Due to systemic failures in staff reporting and documentation of symptoms, the facility did not adequately monitor AV’s change in condition, resulting in a delay in the diagnosis and treatment of the pelvic fracture which is a violation of resident rights, is considered neglect of care which constitutes abuse, as defined by 411-020-0002(1)(b)(A)(i).
- July 16, 2025: Failed to follow care plan Abuse: Neglect; Level 3 - Moderate harm or potential for serious harm; fine $1,125.00; report
Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration); 411-054-0027 (Resident Rights and Protections); 411-054-0028 (Reporting and Investigating Abuse and Other Actions Affecting Resident Welfare); 411-054-0036 (Service Plan – General)State’s findings
On or about July 16, 2025, the facility failed to provide appropriate services as required by the Alleged Victim’s (AV) care plan and assessed needs. As a result of this failure, AV was admitted to the hospital after reporting significant pain of unknown origin and was subsequently diagnosed with a pelvic fracture. Facility documentation and staff interviews indicate that management was not aware of any incident that may have caused the injury. At the time of incident, staff were required to use a gait belt for all transfers; however, it had become common practice for staff to assist AV without a gait belt. Management was not aware that staff were inconsistently using the required transfer equipment. The facility's failure to provide adequate oversight of staff to ensure AV's care plan was followed, resulted in physical harm when AV sustained a pelvic fracture during a transfer which is a violation of resident rights, is considered neglect of care which constitutes abuse, as defined by 411-020-0002(1)(b)(A)(i). Alleged Perpetrator 2 (AP2) allegedly neglected AV. An investigation determined no abuse occurred by AP2.
- December 12, 2023: Failed to provide oversight and monitoring of change of condition Abuse: Neglect; Level 3 - Moderate harm or potential for serious harm; fine $500.00; report
Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration); 411-054-0027 (Resident Rights and Protections); 411-054-0028 (Reporting and Investigating Abuse and Other Actions Affecting Resident Welfare); 411-054-0036 (Service Plan – General); 411-054-0040 (Change of Condition and Monitoring)State’s findings
The facility failed to provide appropriate services according to Alleged Victim's (AV) care needs concerning AV's skin impairment. Based on facility documentation and interviews, staff did not place AV on alert monitoring and also failed to notify facility nurse when staff observed AV's perineal and abdominal fold with a rash on November 26, 2023. As a result of this failure, AV did not receive an appropriate treatment plan from AV's medical provider until after AV returned from visiting Witness 1 (W1) on December 7, 2023. The facility's failure resulted in AV's unreasonable discomfort, which is a violation of resident rights, is considered neglect of care and constitutes abuse.
- December 12, 2023: Failed to provide a safe medication administration system Abuse: Neglect; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; fine $500.00; report
Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration); 411-054-0027 (Resident Rights and Protections); 411-054-0028 (Reporting and Investigating Abuse and Other Actions Affecting Resident Welfare); 411-054-0055 (Medications and Treatments)State’s findings
On or about December 12, 2023, an investigation determined that the facility failed to provide adequate training and oversite to ensure staff packed the appropriate medications for Alleged Victim's (AV) trip away from the facility to visit Witness 1 (W1), resulting in AV's unreasonable discomfort when AV's [GABA analogue medication] was not available for administration. The facility's failure to provide a safe medication system for AV is a violation of resident rights, is considered neglect of care which constitutes abuse.
Show all 11
- October 14, 2023: Failed to provide service Abuse: Neglect; Level 4 - Serious harm, death, imminent danger or chronic regulatory noncompliance; fine $2,500.00; report
Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration); 411-054-0027 (Resident Rights and Protections); 411-054-0028 (Reporting and Investigating Abuse and Other Actions Affecting Resident Welfare); 411-054-0036 (Service Plan – General)State’s findings
On or about October 14, 2023, Alleged Victim (AV) was found deceased in his/her room. Based on facility documentation and interviews, AV had a diagnosis of heart failure, and care staff did not provide adequate care to AV during the night leading up to AV's death when he/she showed signs of being outside his/her baseline. Facility staff failed to notify facility nurse of AV's symptoms per instructions in AV's care plan. Facility staff did not call 911 based on the totality of AV's heart failure symptoms. The facility's failure to provide basic care and services necessary to maintain AV's health and safety is a violation of residents rights, is considered neglect of care, and constitutes abuse.
- July 18, 2023: Failed to provide a safe medication administration system Abuse: Neglect; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; fine $375.00; report
Rules: 411-054-0027 (Resident Rights and Protections); 411-054-0028 (Reporting and Investigating Abuse and Other Actions Affecting Resident Welfare); 411-054-0055 (Medications and Treatments)State’s findings
The facility failed to provide a safe medication administration system to ensure The Alleged Victim’s (AV) medications were administered as ordered. On July 18, 2023, the facility identified an error with AV's antidepressant medication in which AV had been administered twice the daily dosage than what was prescribed since July 7, 2023. Based on interviews and facility documentation, the medication error caused AV to experience drowsiness and AV had several falls between July 11, 2023 and July 13, 2023, resulting in unreasonable discomfort, which is a violation of resident rights, is considered neglect of care and constitutes abuse.
- December 11, 2022: Failed to follow care plan Abuse: Neglect; Level 3 - Moderate harm or potential for serious harm; fine $1,125.00; report
Rules: 411-054-0027 (Resident Rights and Protections); 411-054-0028 (Reporting and Investigating Abuse and Other Actions Affecting Resident Welfare); 411-054-0036 (Service Plan – General)State’s findings
On or about December 11, 2022, the facility failed to provide appropriate services according to the Alleged Victim’s (AV) care needs which resulted in AV choking on a piece of meatball, approximately 1 inch in length and width. Based on facility documentation and interviews, AV's food needs to be pureed and/or mashed due to AV's choking risk. At time of incident, AV's meatball was not pureed and/or mashed causing AV to choke. After W4's, W5's, W3's, and W6's attempt at dislodging the meatball from AV's throat, W2 was finally able to get the piece of meatball out. The failure resulted in AV’s suffering unreasonable discomfort, which is a violation of resident rights, is considered neglect of care and constitutes abuse.
- November 7, 2022: Failed to provide a safe medication administration system Abuse: Neglect; Level 3 - Moderate harm or potential for serious harm; fine $1,125.00; report
Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration); 411-054-0027 (Resident Rights and Protections); 411-054-0028 (Reporting and Investigating Abuse and Other Actions Affecting Resident Welfare); 411-054-0055 (Medications and Treatments)State’s findings
On or about November 7, 2022, Alleged Perpetrator 2 (AP2) administered the wrong medication to Alleged Victim (AV) which resulted in AV going to the hospital for treatment. On the way to the hospital, AV required administration of a rescue medication as a result of AP2's medication error. AP2's actions is considered neglect of care which constitutes abuse. The facility failed to provide a safe medication administration system for AV which resulted in unreasonable discomfort and hospitalization. The facility's failure is a violation of resident rights, is considered neglect of care which constitutes abuse.
- September 28, 2022: Failed to provide or assist with hygiene Abuse: Neglect; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; fine $250.00; report
Rules: 411-054-0027 (Resident Rights and Protections); 411-054-0028 (Reporting and Investigating Abuse and Other Actions Affecting Resident Welfare); 411-054-0036 (Service Plan – General)State’s findings
The facility failed to follow the Alleged Victim's (AV) care plan to provide assistance with AV's hygiene care needs. The facility's failure to follow AV's care plan caused AV unreasonable discomfort and put his/her health at risk of serious harm which is a violation of resident rights, is considered neglect of care and constitutes abuse.
- February 8, 2022: Failed to provide a safe medication administration system Abuse: Neglect; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; fine $250.00; report
Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration); 411-054-0027 (Resident Rights and Protections); 411-054-0028 (Reporting and Investigating Abuse and Other Actions Affecting Resident Welfare); 411-054-0055 (Medications and Treatments)State’s findings
Alleged Perpetrator 2 (AP2) neglected Alleged Victim (AV) by failing to administer AV's medication as ordered which resulted in unreasonable discomfort. AP2's actions is considered neglect of care which constitutes abuse. The facility failed to provide a safe medication administration system for AV which resulted in unreasonable discomfort. The facility's failure is a violation of resident rights, is considered neglect of care and constitutes abuse. The allegation that AP2 verbally abused and physically abused AV was investigated and findings determined no wrongdoing/abuse occurred for these two allegations.
Substantiated licensing violations
- November 30, 2025: Failed to use an ABST Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
Rules: 411-054-0037 (Acuity-Based Staffing Tool)State’s findings
The facility failed to have an updated Acuity-Based Staffing Tool (ABST) that accurately reflected the resident population and their care needs. Inconsistencies were identified between the resident roster, care plans, and the data entered into the ABST. An investigation determined this is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.
- September 12, 2025: Failed to follow care plan Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration)State’s findings
On the morning of the incident, the Alleged Victim (AV) was having breakfast under the supervision of Alleged Perpetrator 2 (AP2), who was the staff member assigned to monitor and assist AV with meals. AV’s initial meal included a sausage patty that had been cut into small, manageable pieces. According to facility documentation and staff interviews, AV was eating well and requested a second serving of the sausage patty. AP2 went to the kitchen to request an additional portion but did not inform kitchen staff that the food was for AV. The second sausage patty was provided whole and uncut. AP2 gave the uncut patty to AV, believing it was small enough to be safely consumed. Shortly after eating the second serving, AV began exhibiting signs of distress, including abnormal behavior, cessation of breathing, and facial discoloration (turning purple). AP2 responded by patting AV on the back and calling for additional staff assistance. AP2 then performed the Heimlich maneuver, successfully dislodging and ejecting pieces of the sausage patty from AV’s airway. AP2 later acknowledged not noticing that the initial portion had been cut and believed they were adequately monitoring AV’s food intake. Although AP2 is trained in resident care, meal assistance, and dietary need, including food handling and safety, at time of incident AP2 failed to ensure that AV’s second meal portion adhered to AV’s dietary restrictions. This failure resulted in AV choking on a meal item. AP2's actions is considered neglect of care which constitutes abuse. Furthermore, the facility failed to provide adequate oversight to ensure AP2 followed AV's dietary and safety protocols. This failure is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.
- September 12, 2025: Failed to use an ABST Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
Rules: 411-054-0037 (Acuity-Based Staffing Tool)State’s findings
The facility failed to have an updated Acuity-Based Staffing Tool (ABST) that accurately reflected the resident population and their care needs. Inconsistencies were identified between the resident roster, care plans, and the data entered into the ABST. An investigation determined this is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.
- August 9, 2025: Failed to use an ABST Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
Rules: 411-054-0037 (Acuity-Based Staffing Tool)State’s findings
On or about August 9, 2025, the facility failed to have an updated Acuity-Based Staffing Tool (ABST) that accurately reflected the resident population and their care needs. Inconsistencies were identified between the resident roster, care plans, and the data entered into the ABST. An investigation determined this is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.
- July 16, 2025: Failed to use an ABST Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
Rules: 411-054-0037 (Acuity-Based Staffing Tool)State’s findings
On July 16, 2025, the facility failed to have an updated Acuity-Based Staffing Tool (ABST) that accurately reflected the resident population and their care needs. Inconsistencies were identified between the resident roster, care plans, and the data entered into the ABST. An investigation determined this is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.
Show all 25
- April 17, 2025: Failed to use an ABST Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
Rules: 411-054-0037 (Acuity-Based Staffing Tool)State’s findings
The facility failed to have an Acuity-Based Staffing Tool (ABST) that accurately reflected the resident population, their needs, and all required Activities of Daily Living (ADL). Inconsistencies were identified between the resident roster, care plans, and the data entered into the ABST. Facility was not staffed to the levels as indicated by the ABST to meet the scheduled and unscheduled needs of residents. An investigation determined this is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.
- April 14, 2025: Failed to use an ABST Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
Rules: 411-054-0037 (Acuity-Based Staffing Tool)State’s findings
On or about April 14, 2025, the facility failed to have an Acuity-Based Staffing Tool (ABST) that accurately reflected the resident population, their needs, and all required Activities of Daily Living (ADL). Inconsistencies were identified between the resident roster, care plans, and the data entered into the ABST. Facility was not staffing to the levels as indicated by the ABST to meet the scheduled and unscheduled needs of residents. An investigation determined this is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.
- April 7, 2025: Failed to provide safe environment Licensing Violation; Level 3 - Moderate harm or potential for serious harm; report
Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration)State’s findings
On January 6, 2026, ODHS Adult Protective Services (APS) completed investigation #00393573 and issued a written investigation report, which is incorporated here by reference. Alleged Victim (AV) lived at Respondent’s facility. Based on facility documentation, interviews, and APS Investigator observations, it was determined that Alleged Perpetrator 2 (AP2) wrongfully obtained AV's bank card and made unauthorized purchases solely for AP2's benefit. The total estimated loss across AV’s bank statement periods (November 2024 to February 2025) is approximately $4,8884.15. AP2 is responsible for financial exploitation which constitutes abuse. The facility failed to protect AV from financial exploitation which is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.
- February 27, 2025: Failed to use an ABST Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
Rules: 411-054-0037 (Acuity-Based Staffing Tool)State’s findings
On or about February 27, 2025, the facility failed to have an Acuity-Based Staffing Tool (ABST) that accurately reflected the resident population, their needs, and all required Activities of Daily Living (ADL). Inconsistencies were identified between the resident roster, care plans, and the data entered into the ABST. Facility was not staffing to the levels as indicated by the ABST to meet the scheduled and unscheduled needs of residents. An investigation determined this is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.
- January 16, 2025: Failed to use an ABST Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
Rules: 411-054-0037 (Acuity-Based Staffing Tool)State’s findings
The facility failed to have an updated Acuity-Based Staffing Tool (ABST) that accurately reflected the resident population and their care needs. Inconsistencies were identified between the resident roster, care plans, and the data entered into the ABST. An investigation determined this is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.
- December 15, 2024: Failed to use an ABST Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
Rules: 411-054-0037 (Acuity-Based Staffing Tool)State’s findings
The facility failed to develop, maintain, and implement an Acuity Based Staffing Tool in accordance with OAR 411-054-0037(1-7), which is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.
- November 25, 2024: Failed to provide appropriate staffing Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
Rules: 411-054-0037 (Acuity-Based Staffing Tool)State’s findings
The facility failed to fully implement, staff to and update an acuity-based staffing tool in accordance with OAR 411-054-0037.
- November 5, 2024: Failed to protect resident from financial exploitation Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration); 411-054-0027 (Resident Rights and Protections); 411-054-0028 (Reporting and Investigating Abuse and Other Actions Affecting Resident Welfare)State’s findings
On or about November 5, 2024, a staff member entered the room of the Alleged Victim (AV) and noticed that AV was counting out money while Alleged Perpetrator #2 (AP2) was in the room and asked what was going on. AV stated they were counting out money to give to AP2. AP2 then advised AV they would be back later. AV confirmed that he/she had been giving money to AP2 for over a year. AP2's actions are a violation of resident rights, are considered neglect of care and constitute financial abuse. The facility's failure to protect AV from financial abuse is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.
- November 5, 2024: Failed to protect resident from financial exploitation Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration); 411-054-0027 (Resident Rights and Protections); 411-054-0028 (Reporting and Investigating Abuse and Other Actions Affecting Resident Welfare)State’s findings
On or about November 5, 2024, it was discovered by facility staff that the Alleged Victim (AV) was giving money to Alleged Perpetrator #2 (AP2) for approximately a year. AV saw another resident counting out money to AP2 and advised facility staff that they had also been giving money to AP2. AP2 admitted to taking money from AV. AP2's actions are a violation of resident rights, are considered neglect of care and constitute financial abuse. The facility's failure to protect AV from financial abuse is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.
- November 5, 2024: Failed to use an ABST Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
Rules: 411-054-0037 (Acuity-Based Staffing Tool)State’s findings
On or about November 5, 2024, the facility failed to have an Acuity-Based Staffing Tool (ABST) that accurately reflected the resident population, their needs, and all required Activities of Daily Living (ADL). Inconsistencies were identified between the resident roster, care plans, and the data entered into the ABST. Facility was not staffing to the levels as indicated by the ABST to meet the scheduled and unscheduled needs of residents. An investigation determined this is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.
- October 11, 2024: Failed to use an ABST Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
Rules: 411-054-0037 (Acuity-Based Staffing Tool)State’s findings
The facility failed to have an updated Acuity-Based Staffing Tool (ABST) that accurately reflected the resident population and their care needs. Inconsistencies were identified between the resident roster, care plans, and the data entered into the ABST. An investigation determined this is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.
- August 12, 2024: Failed to provide safe environment Licensing Violation; Level 3 - Moderate harm or potential for serious harm; report
Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration)State’s findings
Alleged Victim (AV) is a resident of the facility who receives assistance with activities of daily living, including mobility and ambulation. On August 12, 2024, Alleged Perpetrator 2 (AP2) and Alleged Perpetrator 3 (AP3) were escorting AV with a manual wheelchair in the elevator. While in the elevator, AP2 and AP3 began teasing AV while playing with AV's spiked hair as AP2 and AP3 stood behind AV. AV repeatedly asked AP2 and AP3 to stop; however, AP2 and AP3 did not stop teasing AV while working in role of AV's caregiver. After leaving the elevator, AP2 and AP3, both staff members of the facility sat down on the couch by the elevator and told AV that he/she could move to his/her room without assistance. AP2 and AP3 said, "Do it yourself," while laughing. This caused AV to become angry, and AV demanded AP2 and AP3 to escort him/her back to his/her apartment. In frustration, AV punched the wall. AP3 then escorted AV to his/her apartment but pushed AV in his/her manual wheelchair toward the bed without proper safety, causing AV to almost hit his/her bed frame. Upset by the staff's member behavior, AV became distressed to the point of self-harming. AP2's and AP3's actions caused AV emotional harm. An investigation determined that AP2's actions is considered neglect of care and verbal/emotional abuse. Both allegations, neglect of care and verbal/emotional abuse constitutes abuse. An investigation determined that AP3's actions are considered neglect of care, verbal/emotional abuse, and neglect of care. All three allegations, neglect of care (2) and verbal/emotional abuse (1) constitutes abuse. The facility failed to provide a safe environment for AV which is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.
- August 10, 2024: Failed to provide safe environment Licensing Violation; Level 3 - Moderate harm or potential for serious harm; report
Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration); 411-054-0027 (Resident Rights and Protections)State’s findings
Alleged Victim (AV) is a resident of the facility who receives assistance with his/her Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), including dressing and behavioral support. AV is hearing impaired. On or about August 10, 2024, Alleged Perpetrator 2 (AP2) and Alleged Perpetrator 3 (AP3) were assisting AV with his/her ADLs as caregivers of the facility. While assisting AV with his/her care needs, AP2 and AP3 made inappropriate comments about AV and used universal hand gestures for describing AV, like saying AV was fat or other derogatory comments. AV can read lips a little and it was clear AV was understanding in the moment how AP2 and AP3 were treating AV. AP2's and AP3's actions caused AV to become emotionally upset and at times AV to cry. AP2's and AP3's actions caused AV emotional harm which is considered verbal and emotional abuse. The facility failed to provide a safe environment for AV by failing to ensure AP2 and AP3 conducted themselves appropriately while acting within the scope of his/her employee status. The facility's failure is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules. AP3 allegedly failed to assist AV with shoulder support while assisting AV with his/her ADLs. An investigation determined AP3 did not neglect or abuse AV when AP3 assisted with unclipping AV's shoulder sling to remove it.
- May 14, 2024: Failed to provide medical treatment as ordered Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
Rules: 411-054-0055 (Medications and Treatments)State’s findings
The facility failed to carry out treatment orders. An investigation determined this is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.
- February 12, 2024: Failed to assure resident rights Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
Rules: 411-054-0070 (Staffing Requirements and Training)State’s findings
The facility failed to ensure staff have sufficient communication and language skills to enable them to perform their duties and communicate with residents, other staff, family members, and health care professionals, as needed. An investigation determined this is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.
- September 15, 2023: Failed to answer call light in a timely manner Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
Rules: 411-054-0070 (Staffing Requirements and Training)State’s findings
The facility failed to provide qualified awake direct care staff sufficient in number to meet the 24-hour scheduled and unscheduled needs of each resident. An investigation determined no licensing violation or abuse occurred.
- September 15, 2023: Failed to assure resident rights Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
Rules: 411-054-0070 (Staffing Requirements and Training)State’s findings
The facility failed to ensure that staff have sufficient communication and language skills to enable them to perform their duties and communicate with residents. An investigation determined this is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.
- August 2, 2023: Failed to provide safe environment Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration)State’s findings
On or about August 2, 2023, Alleged Perpetrator 2 (AP2) failed to follow Alleged Victim's (AV) care plan for a two person assist with a mechanical lift for all transfers. Based on interviews and facility documentation, AP2 assisted AV without assistance causing AV to fall with injury. AV experienced pain and unreasonsible discomfort. AP2's actions is considered neglect of care which constitutes abuse. The facility failed to provide a safe environment for AV which is a failure of Oregon Administrative Rules.
- June 10, 2023: Failed to provide safe environment Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration)State’s findings
During the June 10, 2023 to June 11, 2023 night shift, Alleged Perpetrator 2 (AP2) was rough with Alleged Victim (AV) while assisting AV with his/her Activities of Daily Living. Based on facility documentation and interviews, AP2 failed to follow AV's care plan for two person assistance with AV's Activities of Daily Living. AP2 kept changing AV when AV asked AP2 for a two person assistance and AP2 moved AV's legs too fast causing pain in the hip and legs. AP2's actions caused AV unreasonable discomfort which is considered neglect of care which constitutes abuse. The facility failed to provide a safe environment for AV which is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.
- June 23, 2022: Failed to provide a safe medication administration system Licensing Violation; Level 3 - Moderate harm or potential for serious harm; report
Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration); 411-054-0055 (Medications and Treatments)State’s findings
On or about June 23, 2023, Alleged Perpetrator 2 (AP2) gave Alleged Victim (AV) another resident's medication which resulted in AV becoming non-responsive and was taken to the hospital for treatment. AP2's action is considered neglect of care which constitutes abuse. The facility failed to provide a safe medication administration system which is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.
Read the full record on the state’s site →
ODHS lists only substantiated violations: “either a substantiated instance of abuse or a licensing violation. Open investigations and complaints that are being appealed by the provider are not listed.” Oregon counts neglect as a form of abuse; see the state’s definitions of abuse. Each violation shows the level ODHS gives it, in the state’s words (for example “2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm”), and any fine ODHS assessed. Inspection citations show the state’s severity level and scope, and the date ODHS recorded the problem as corrected when it lists one. Rule names come from the Oregon Administrative Rules. ODHS: “Formal regulatory actions can range from a condition placed upon a license due to non-compliance or a notice to revoke a license.” This community is licensed for 78 residents; larger communities are inspected and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Oregon Department of Human Services, Long-Term Care Licensing, data as of October 15, 2026, showing the last five years. Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.
License and ownershipActive license
- License type
- Assisted Living Facility
- License number
- 70A290
- License status
- Active
- Licensed capacity
- 78
- County
- Multnomah County
Source: Oregon state licensing records (agency listing), retrieved 2026-09-09. Licensing status is a matter of public record; it is not a quality rating.
Paying with Medicaid and other programsOn the Oregon list of Medicaid providers (2026)
On the Oregon list of Medicaid providers. Listed as Avamere at Chestnut Lane under Accepts Medicaid (ODHS licensing record). (state list, as of Sep 9, 2026)
Being on the list means the community has taken part in the program. Ask whether it has a Medicaid opening now, and how many residents it serves on Medicaid.
Staff pay and workplace safety1 federal wage case with violations found; 2 OSHA inspections, 2 violations cited
Federal records about how the employer here treats its staff.
Federal wage and hour cases
The Department of Labor checks that staff are paid minimum wage and overtime as the law requires.
- Findings for Apr 20, 2013 to May 2, 2015. Violations found: Overtime. Back wages: $3,201 owed to 20 employees. Employer as DOL recorded it: Brookdale Chestnut Lane Gresham (Emeritus Corporation dbaBrookdaleChestnutLane). Case 1757682.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Wage and Hour Division enforcement data, loaded Oct 15, 2026. Concluded cases only. The dates are the period in which DOL found violations, not when the case opened or closed. Back wages are what the employer agreed to pay; penalties are what DOL assessed. DOL does not publish a page for each case, so search the dataset by case number.
OSHA workplace safety inspections
OSHA inspects workplaces for staff safety, such as lifting, needles, chemicals and workplace violence. It does not inspect resident care.
- Dec 11, 2024: programmed (planned) inspection, complete (safety). Case closed Jul 21, 2025. 2 violations cited (2 other). Penalties: $0 proposed, $0 now. OSHA record. OSHA recorded the employer as 317738772 - Chestnut Lane Operations LLC.
Details
- Other than serious: Cited rule OAR. Penalty $0 proposed, $0 now. To be fixed by Dec 11, 2024.
- Other than serious: Cited rule OAR. Penalty $0 proposed, $0 now. To be fixed by Apr 7, 2025.
- Sep 26, 2017: programmed (planned) inspection, complete (safety). Case closed Sep 29, 2017. No violations cited. OSHA record. OSHA recorded the employer as 317718385 - Emeritus Corp. Matched by street address; the name OSHA recorded differs from the community's.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor OSHA enforcement data, as of Oct 15, 2026, inspections since 2016. Penalties can change while a case is open or contested.
Location and nearby careNearest hospital 1.3 mi, nursing home 0.5 mi, pharmacy 0.2 mi
- Nearest hospital with an emergency room
- Legacy Mount Hood Medical Center, Gresham. 1.3 miles away, straight line. CMS overall hospital rating: 3 of 5 stars.
- Nearest Medicare nursing home
- Gresham Post Acute Care and Rehabilitation, Gresham. 0.5 miles away, straight line.
- Nearest home health agency office
- Nightingale Home Health, Portland. 6.1 miles away, straight line. Agencies travel to clients, so ask which ones serve this address.
- Nearest pharmacy
- East County Pharmacy. 0.2 miles away, straight line. From OpenStreetMap, which does not list every pharmacy, so one may be closer.
- Area
- USDA classes ZIP code 97030 as metropolitan (metropolitan core).
- Dialysis within 15 miles
- Usrc Gresham Dialysis, Gresham, 0.3 miles away, straight line (has a shift starting after 5 pm; CMS rating 2 of 5 stars)
Davita Gresham Station Dialysis, Gresham, 1.2 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 3 of 5 stars)
Fmc Dialysis Mt Hood, Gresham, 1.2 miles away, straight line (has a shift starting after 5 pm; CMS rating 3 of 5 stars) - Hospice
- 28 Medicare hospices tell CMS they serve ZIP code 97030.
Pinnacle Hospice Care Of Portland, office in Portland, 6.6 miles away, straight line
Adventist Health Hospice, office in Portland, 7.0 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 3 of 5 stars)
Agape Hospice Nw, office in Clackamas, 8.2 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 1 of 5 stars) - Nearest geriatric medicine practice
- The Vancouver Clinic Inc Ps, Gresham. 0.9 miles away, straight line. 1 geriatric medicine doctor listed there.
Distances are straight lines from the community, not driving distance. Hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors come from CMS provider data (CMS, hospital list updated Jul 22, 2026). Star ratings are CMS’s own.
Emergency and natural hazard riskFEMA overall risk relatively high; outside FEMA's high-risk flood areas
Public hazard maps for this location. Ask the community about its emergency plan, its generator and where residents would go in an evacuation.
- Flood zone
- Outside the high and moderate risk flood areas on FEMA's flood map (Zone X, minimal flood hazard, or not studied). (FEMA flood map)
- FEMA National Risk Index
- Overall: relatively high. By hazard: inland flooding relatively moderate, wildfire very low, tornado very low, heat wave relatively moderate, earthquake very high. These are FEMA’s ratings for the census tract, compared with tracts nationwide. (FEMA, December 2025)
A flood zone describes the map at this point, not the building's elevation. In an emergency, follow the local emergency management agency.
Questions to ask on a tour10 questions picked for this community from its record
Picked for this community from its record. Ask them in person and write down the answers.
- The state recorded a finding in November 2025. What was it, and how was it fixed?
- Your published starting price is a base rate. What would the total monthly cost be for my parent's needs?
- How much have prices gone up in each of the last three years?
- How many caregivers are on duty during the day and at night?
- What happens if care needs increase? When would someone need to move?
- What fees are charged at move-in?
- How do you tell families about falls, illness or changes?
- How long have the executive director and the head of care been here?
- Who gives medications, and what training do they have?
- For what reasons can a resident be asked to leave?
What we checked13 public sources we searched, with dates
Every public source we searched for this community. “Nothing on record” means we found no record that matched it. A record can be missed when a name or address differs.
| Source | Data as of | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Oregon Department of Human Services, Long-Term Care Licensing inspection records | Oct 15, 2026 | See above |
| Oregon Medicaid provider list | Sep 9, 2026 | See above |
| U.S. Department of Labor wage and hour cases | Oct 15, 2026 | See above |
| OSHA workplace safety inspections since 2016 | Oct 15, 2026 | See above |
| FEMA flood map | See above | |
| USDA wildfire risk | Apr 15, 2026 | Not shown: FEMA rates wildfire risk here very low |
| FEMA National Risk Index | See above | |
| CMS hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors; OpenStreetMap pharmacies | See above | |
| HUD Multifamily Properties - Assisted | Jul 6, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| State Veterans Homes (NASVH directory) | Sep 20, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| CMS Hospice - General Information | Aug 19, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| CMS Home Health Care Agencies | May 27, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| The community’s own website | See above |
Common questionsAnswers to 4 questions families ask
What type of care does Avamere at Chestnut Lane provide?
Avamere at Chestnut Lane is licensed by the state of Oregon for assisted living in Gresham, Oregon. Its licensed capacity is 78 residents.
Does Lilisity rate Avamere at Chestnut Lane?
No. We publish state licensing details for Avamere at Chestnut Lane but no score, rating, or ranking. Only communities on the Top Communities list or with a Senior Living Alliance Excellence Award, both based on phone-verified resident and family interviews, are ranked.
How much does Avamere at Chestnut Lane cost?
Assisted Living in Oregon typically starts at $4,600 to $5,800 a month. Based on 108 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price. The starting prices it publishes are in the Prices section on this page.
How do I contact Avamere at Chestnut Lane?
Use Avamere at Chestnut Lane's website, avamereatchestnutlane.com, or visit at 1219 Ne 6th Street, Gresham, OR 97030.
How Lilisity works. The only scores or rankings Lilisity publishes are the Top Communities list and the Excellence Awards, both built from phone-verified resident and family interviews. Communities can pay Lilisity a flat monthly fee to manage their own listing: photos, prices, contact details, and receiving the inquiries families choose to send them. The fee is the same no matter how many families contact them or move in. Senior Living Alliance, which runs Lilisity, offers the same listing to its member communities as part of their membership; members pay SLA for its resident and family interview program. No community pays Lilisity per inquiry, per referral or per move-in. Payment never changes a testimonial, a rating, or the order of search results. The "Nearby Senior Living Alliance communities" box shows member communities only. How we verify testimonials · How we are paid