Assisted Living and Memory Care
Footsteps at Happy Valley
13160 Se 172nd Ave, Happy Valley, OR 97086 · Map
Licensed for 32 residents
Footsteps at Happy Valley is a state-licensed assisted living, memory care community in Happy Valley, Oregon. It is licensed for 32 residents. Lilisity publishes no score or ranking for this community; the details below come from the state licensing record.
Prices
This community does not publish its prices.
Area costs
Care and services
From the community’s website
What Footsteps at Happy Valley says about itself, quoted from its own site. We have not checked these claims against licensing records. Ask about each one on a tour.
Lilisity’s independent report
What the public record shows
Gathered by Lilisity from state and federal sources. Communities can’t edit this part of the page.
State inspections
Last inspection: Feb 12, 2024. See the record
License
Active, 32 residents
Residential Care Facility (Memory Care endorsement) 50R516.
Nearest emergency room
3.6 miles
Kaiser Sunnyside Medical Center, rated 4 of 5 stars by CMS.
Side by side with nearby communities
The 4 nearest communities that offer assisted living, by straight-line distance. Prices are starting prices each community publishes; we never show estimates.
| Community | Distance | Licensed capacity | Published starting price | License | Inspection citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Footsteps at Happy Valley this community | 32 | Not published | Active | 13 deficiencies, 12 violations | |
| The Springs at Happy Valley | 0.0 mi | 92 | $5,600/mo | Active | 11 deficiencies, 4 violations |
| Miracle Heights at Happy Valley | 1.3 mi | 47 | Not published | Active | 12 deficiencies, 5 violations |
| Footsteps at Sunnyside | 1.5 mi | 26 | Not published | Active | 20 deficiencies, 6 violations |
| The Springs at Sunnyside | 1.5 mi | 77 | $5,915/mo | Active | 26 deficiencies, 14 violations |
State inspection record13 deficiencies, 12 violations
- Last inspection
- February 12, 2024
- Inspections
- 2, 13 deficiencies cited
- Substantiated abuse
- 10
- Substantiated licensing violations
- 2
- Regulatory actions
- 0
- Fines assessed
- $4,371.00 (10 violations)
- Current owner since
- May 4, 2023
- Every deficiency from the February 12, 2024 inspection was corrected by September 8, 2024
Inspections
- February 12, 2024: Initial Licensure, 13 deficiencies cited report
- C0000: Comment severity level 0
- C0160: Reasonable Precautions severity level 2, scope L2 Pattern, corrected September 8, 2024
- C0231: Reporting & Investigating Abuse-Other Action severity level 3, scope L3 Isolated, corrected April 15, 2024
- C0260: Service Plan: General severity level 2, scope L2 Pattern, corrected April 15, 2024
- C0270: Change of Condition and Monitoring severity level 3, scope L3 Isolated, corrected April 15, 2024
Show all 17
- C0295: Infection Prevention & Control severity level 2, scope L2 Widespread, corrected September 8, 2024
- C0302: Systems: Tracking Control Substances severity level 2, scope L2 Isolated, corrected April 15, 2024
- C0303: Systems: Treatment Orders severity level 2, scope L2 Isolated, corrected September 8, 2024
- C0330: Systems: Psychotropic Medication severity level 2, scope L2 Isolated, corrected September 8, 2024
- C0361: Acuity-Based Staffing Tool severity level 2, scope L2 Widespread, corrected September 8, 2024
- C0420: Fire and Life Safety: Safety severity level 2, scope L2 Widespread, corrected April 15, 2024
- C0422: Fire and Life Safety: Training For Residents severity level 2, scope L2 Widespread, corrected April 15, 2024
- C0455: Inspections and Investigation: Insp Interval severity level 2, scope L2 Pattern, corrected September 8, 2024
- C0530: Housekeeping and Laundry severity level 2, scope L2 Widespread, corrected April 15, 2024
- Z0142: Administration Compliance severity level 3, scope L3 Isolated, corrected September 8, 2024
- Z0162: Compliance With Rules Health Care severity level 3, scope L3 Isolated, corrected September 8, 2024
- Z0164: Activities severity level 2, scope L2 Pattern, corrected April 15, 2024
- November 7, 2023: State Licensure, 0 deficiencies cited report
- C0000: Comment severity level 0
Substantiated abuse or neglect
- December 30, 2024: Failed to provide safe environment Abuse: Neglect; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; fine $338.00; report
Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration); 411-054-0027 (Resident Rights and Protections); 411-054-0028 (Reporting and Investigating Abuse and Other Actions Affecting Resident Welfare)State’s findings
The facility failed to provide a safe environment for the Alleged Victim (AV) who has a known history of elopements and exit seeking behavior. On or about December 30, 2024, the facility held a fire drill. During the fire drill, another resident’s family member was leaving the facility and when they exited the facility, the AV followed them out the door. The facility staff did not notice the AV leaving the secured memory care facility. The AV was found outside of the secured memory care by staff from another unit and was escorted back to the memory care unit. The facility failed to provide a safe environment allowing the AV to leave the secured memory care without supervision, which is a violation of resident rights, is considered neglect of care and constitutes abuse.
- December 14, 2024: Failed to properly plan care Abuse: Neglect; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; fine $338.00; report
Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration); 411-054-0027 (Resident Rights and Protections); 411-054-0028 (Reporting and Investigating Abuse and Other Actions Affecting Resident Welfare)State’s findings
According to the documentation, the facility failed to properly care plan appropriate interventions for the Alleged Victim’s (AV) exit seeking behavior leading to multiple elopements from the secured memory care facility. On or about December 14, 2024, the AV eloped from the secured memory care approximately three times. The AV was able to obtain the code to exit the facility. The AV used the code to leave the facility approximately three times in one day. Due to AV’s cognitive status, they were not able to find their way back to the facility and was found in the parking lot of the assisted living. The AV was able to be redirected back to the secured unit after each elopement. The facility failed to implement appropriate interventions after the initial elopement to ensure the AV was not able to leave the secured unit unaccompanied, placing them at risk for harm, which is a violation of resident rights, is considered neglect of care and constitutes abuse.
- October 13, 2024: Failed to properly plan care Abuse: Neglect; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; fine $338.00; report
Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration); 411-054-0027 (Resident Rights and Protections); 411-054-0028 (Reporting and Investigating Abuse and Other Actions Affecting Resident Welfare); 411-054-0036 (Service Plan – General)State’s findings
According to the documentation, the facility failed to properly care plan appropriate interventions for the Alleged Victim’s (AV) exit seeking behaviors. On or about October 13, 2024, the AV exited the secured memory care facility by following a staff member out the door at approximately 2:00 pm. The AV was seen outside the locked facility walking on the sidewalk. A facility staff member was able to guide the AV back into the building, which is a violation of resident rights, is considered neglect of care and constitutes abuse.
- October 13, 2024: Failed to provide safe environment Abuse: Neglect; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; fine $169.00; report
Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration); 411-054-0027 (Resident Rights and Protections); 411-054-0028 (Reporting and Investigating Abuse and Other Actions Affecting Resident Welfare); 411-054-0036 (Service Plan – General)State’s findings
According to the documentation, the facility failed to provide a safe environment for the Alleged Victim (AV) by allowing them to exit the secured facility. On or about October 13, 2024, the AV was able to exit the facility by following someone out the front door. According to the AV’s service plan, they are known to try and exit the facility when others are leaving. The AV was found outside in the parking lot and was able to be redirected back into the facility. The facility failed to provide a safe environment by allowing the AV to exit the secured memory care facility, which is a violation of resident rights, is considered neglect of care and constitutes abuse.
- September 18, 2024: Failed to follow care plan Abuse: Neglect; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; fine $900.00; report
Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration); 411-054-0027 (Resident Rights and Protections); 411-054-0028 (Reporting and Investigating Abuse and Other Actions Affecting Resident Welfare); 411-054-0036 (Service Plan – General)State’s findings
According to the documentation, the facility staff failed to follow the care plan for the Alleged Victim’s (AV) known history of exit seeking behavior. AV’s service plan states the staff are to keep eyes on the AV to ensure they do not follow visitors out the door. On or about September 17, 2024, the AV followed a visitor outside of the locked memory care unit and into another part of the campus building. The staff were unaware the AV had exited the secured memory care unit. Staff from another unit notified the memory care a resident had gotten out of the secured unit. The AV was redirected back into the secure unit. The failure to follow the care plan to ensure the AV did not follow a visitor out of the secured unit placed the AV at risk of harm, which is a violation of resident rights, is considered neglect of care and constitutes abuse.
Show all 10
- September 18, 2024: Failed to follow care plan Abuse: Neglect; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; fine $900.00; report
Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration); 411-054-0027 (Resident Rights and Protections); 411-054-0028 (Reporting and Investigating Abuse and Other Actions Affecting Resident Welfare); 411-054-0036 (Service Plan – General)State’s findings
According to the documentation, the facility staff failed to follow the care plan for the Alleged Victim’s (AV) known history of exit seeking behavior. AV’s service plan states the staff are to keep eyes on the AV to ensure they do not follow visitors out the door. On or about October 28, 2024, the AV followed a visitor outside of the locked memory care unit and into another part of the campus building. The staff were unaware the AV had exited the secured memory care unit. Staff from another unit notified the memory care a resident had gotten out of the secured unit. The AV was redirected back into the secure unit. The service plan for the AV was not updated after the resident eloped from the secured memory care on or about September 17, 2024. The failure to follow the care plan to ensure the AV did not follow a visitor out of the secured unit placed the AV at risk of harm, which is a violation of resident rights, is considered neglect of care and constitutes abuse.
- September 14, 2024: Failed to follow care plan Abuse: Neglect; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; fine $375.00; report
Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration); 411-054-0027 (Resident Rights and Protections); 411-054-0028 (Reporting and Investigating Abuse and Other Actions Affecting Resident Welfare); 411-054-0036 (Service Plan – General)State’s findings
According to the documentation, the facility failed to follow the care plan for Witness 1 (W1) for their known history of resident-to-resident altercations. On or about September 14, 2024, the Alleged Victim (AV) walked into W1’s room causing W1 to become physically aggressive and hitting the AV in the arm several times while yelling at the AV. The AV has a history of going into other resident’s rooms and is service planned to be redirected when the AV is expressing this behavior. The failure to follow the care plan is a violation of resident rights, is considered neglect of care and constitutes abuse.
- June 25, 2024: Failed to properly plan care Abuse: Neglect; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; fine $375.00; report
Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration); 411-054-0027 (Resident Rights and Protections); 411-054-0028 (Reporting and Investigating Abuse and Other Actions Affecting Resident Welfare); 411-054-0036 (Service Plan – General)State’s findings
According to the documentation, the facility failed to implement appropriate interventions to ensure the prevention of the Alleged Victim (AV) eloping out of the secure memory care. On or about June 25, 2024, at approximately 1430, the AV was found on the sidewalk walking by themselves without supervision. The AV has cognitive issues and is service planned to need an escort while outside the locked facility, which is a violation of resident rights, is considered neglect of care and constitutes abuse.
- December 26, 2023: Failed to follow care plan Abuse: Neglect; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; fine $188.00; report
Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration); 411-054-0027 (Resident Rights and Protections); 411-054-0028 (Reporting and Investigating Abuse and Other Actions Affecting Resident Welfare); 411-054-0036 (Service Plan – General)State’s findings
According to the documentation, the facility failed to follow the care plan to provide incontinence care to the Alleged Victim (AV) timely. The failure resulted in the AV to not have their incontinence supplies changed timely causing skin breakdown and pressure sores, which is a violation of resident rights, is considered neglect of care and constitutes abuse.
- October 23, 2023: Failed to provide medical treatment as ordered Abuse: Neglect; Level 3 - Moderate harm or potential for serious harm; fine $450.00; report
Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration); 411-054-0027 (Resident Rights and Protections); 411-054-0028 (Reporting and Investigating Abuse and Other Actions Affecting Resident Welfare); 411-054-0055 (Medications and Treatments)State’s findings
According to the documentation, the facility failed to provide wound care for the Alleged Victim’s (AV) wounds on their hip. On or about November 02, 2023, it was noticed by facility staff the AV’s wound care bandages had not been changed in approximately a week. As a result of not changing the bandages timely, the AV experienced redness to the wound area and cellulitis. The AV was transported to the hospital for treatment of their wounds, which is a violation of resident rights, is considered neglect of care and constitutes abuse.
Substantiated licensing violations
- September 6, 2025: Failed to provide safe environment Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration); 411-054-0027 (Resident Rights and Protections)State’s findings
According to the documentation, Alleged Perpetrator 2 (AP2), Alleged Perpetrator 3 (AP3), and Alleged Perpetrator 4 (AP4) failed to follow facility policy to ensure no residents left the secured building behind them and allowed the Alleged Victim (AV) out of the secured memory care. The AV is care planned to have exit seeking behaviors. On or about September 06, 2025, AP2, AP3 and AP4 were exiting the building after their shift ended and did not follow facility procedures to check for residents potentially following them out. During this time, the AV was able to exit the facility behind the three staff members. one of the AP’s noticed the AV walking along the sidewalk when they were by their car. The AP was able to redirect the AV back into the facility. The failure to follow facility procedures to ensure residents did not leave the secured memory care unattended is a violation of resident rights, is considered neglect of care and constitutes abuse. The facility failed to provide a safe environment which is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.
- January 30, 2024: Failed to assure resident was safe Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration); 411-054-0027 (Resident Rights and Protections)State’s findings
According to the documentation, the Alleged Perpetrator 2 (AP2) used failed to ensure the Alleged Victim (AV) was safe. On or about January 30, 2024, when AP2 used the keypad to enter the locked memory care facility, the AV was at the door and the AP2 let AV out creating a risk of harm to the AV, which is a violation of resident rights, is considered neglect of care and constitutes abuse. The facility failed to prevent elopement which is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.
Read the full record on the state’s site →
ODHS lists only substantiated violations: “either a substantiated instance of abuse or a licensing violation. Open investigations and complaints that are being appealed by the provider are not listed.” Oregon counts neglect as a form of abuse; see the state’s definitions of abuse. Each violation shows the level ODHS gives it, in the state’s words (for example “2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm”), and any fine ODHS assessed. Inspection citations show the state’s severity level and scope, and the date ODHS recorded the problem as corrected when it lists one. Rule names come from the Oregon Administrative Rules. ODHS: “Formal regulatory actions can range from a condition placed upon a license due to non-compliance or a notice to revoke a license.” This community is licensed for 32 residents; larger communities are inspected and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Oregon Department of Human Services, Long-Term Care Licensing, data as of October 15, 2026, showing the last five years. Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.
License and ownershipActive license
- License type
- Residential Care Facility (Memory Care endorsement)
- License number
- 50R516
- License status
- Active
- Licensed capacity
- 32
- County
- Clackamas County
Source: Oregon state licensing records (agency listing), retrieved 2026-09-09. Licensing status is a matter of public record; it is not a quality rating.
Location and nearby careNearest hospital 3.6 mi, nursing home 3.9 mi, pharmacy 0.1 mi
- Nearest hospital with an emergency room
- Kaiser Sunnyside Medical Center, Clackamas. 3.6 miles away, straight line. CMS overall hospital rating: 4 of 5 stars.
- Nearest Medicare nursing home
- Cedar Crossings, Portland. 3.9 miles away, straight line.
- Nearest home health agency office
- Connected Home Health, Clackamas. 3.5 miles away, straight line. Agencies travel to clients, so ask which ones serve this address.
- Nearest pharmacy
- Fred Meyer Pharmacy. 0.1 miles away, straight line. From OpenStreetMap, which does not list every pharmacy, so one may be closer.
- Area
- USDA classes ZIP code 97086 as metropolitan (metropolitan core).
- Dialysis within 15 miles
- Fmc Clackamas Kidney Center, Clackamas, 3.7 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 3 of 5 stars)
Kaiser Sunnybrook Peritoneal Dialysis Facility, Clackamas, 3.7 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 4 of 5 stars)
Davita Lake Road Dialysis, Milwaukie, 5.2 miles away, straight line (has a shift starting after 5 pm; CMS rating 3 of 5 stars) - Hospice
- 26 Medicare hospices tell CMS they serve ZIP code 97086.
Agape Hospice Nw, office in Clackamas, 3.6 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 1 of 5 stars)
Bristol Hospice Oregon LLC, office in Clackamas, 4.1 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 3 of 5 stars)
Heart 2 Heart Hospice Care LLC, office in Portland, 4.7 miles away, straight line - Nearest geriatric medicine practice
- Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Of The Northwest, Clackamas. 3.6 miles away, straight line. 1 geriatric medicine doctor listed there.
Distances are straight lines from the community, not driving distance. Hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors come from CMS provider data (CMS, hospital list updated Jul 22, 2026). Star ratings are CMS’s own.
Emergency and natural hazard riskFEMA overall risk relatively moderate; outside FEMA's high-risk flood areas
Public hazard maps for this location. Ask the community about its emergency plan, its generator and where residents would go in an evacuation.
- Flood zone
- Outside the high and moderate risk flood areas on FEMA's flood map (Zone X, minimal flood hazard, or not studied). (FEMA flood map)
- FEMA National Risk Index
- Overall: relatively moderate. By hazard: inland flooding relatively moderate, wildfire relatively low, tornado very low, heat wave relatively moderate, earthquake relatively moderate. These are FEMA’s ratings for the census tract, compared with tracts nationwide. (FEMA, December 2025)
A flood zone describes the map at this point, not the building's elevation. In an emergency, follow the local emergency management agency.
Questions to ask on a tour10 questions picked for this community from its record
Picked for this community from its record. Ask them in person and write down the answers.
- The state recorded a finding in September 2025. What was it, and how was it fixed?
- What does the base rate include, and when did rates last go up?
- How many caregivers work in memory care during the day, the evening and overnight, and for how many residents?
- What dementia training does each caregiver get before working alone, and every year after?
- How do staff respond when a resident is agitated, frightened or tries to leave?
- How many caregivers are on duty during the day and at night?
- What happens if care needs increase? When would someone need to move?
- What fees are charged at move-in?
- How do you tell families about falls, illness or changes?
- How long have the executive director and the head of care been here?
What we checked13 public sources we searched, with dates
Every public source we searched for this community. “Nothing on record” means we found no record that matched it. A record can be missed when a name or address differs.
| Source | Data as of | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Oregon Department of Human Services, Long-Term Care Licensing inspection records | Oct 15, 2026 | See above |
| Oregon Medicaid provider list | Sep 9, 2026 | Not on the state list we checked. These lists are often incomplete. |
| U.S. Department of Labor wage and hour cases | Oct 15, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| OSHA workplace safety inspections since 2016 | Oct 15, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| FEMA flood map | See above | |
| USDA wildfire risk | Apr 15, 2026 | Not shown: FEMA rates wildfire risk here relatively low |
| FEMA National Risk Index | See above | |
| CMS hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors; OpenStreetMap pharmacies | See above | |
| HUD Multifamily Properties - Assisted | Jul 6, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| State Veterans Homes (NASVH directory) | Sep 20, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| CMS Hospice - General Information | Aug 19, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| CMS Home Health Care Agencies | May 27, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| The community’s own website | See above |
Common questionsAnswers to 4 questions families ask
What type of care does Footsteps at Happy Valley provide?
Footsteps at Happy Valley is licensed by the state of Oregon for assisted living, memory care in Happy Valley, Oregon. Its licensed capacity is 32 residents.
Does Lilisity rate Footsteps at Happy Valley?
No. We publish state licensing details for Footsteps at Happy Valley but no score, rating, or ranking. Only communities on the Top Communities list or with a Senior Living Alliance Excellence Award, both based on phone-verified resident and family interviews, are ranked.
How much does Footsteps at Happy Valley cost?
Assisted Living in Oregon typically starts at $4,600 to $5,800 a month. Based on 108 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price. Footsteps at Happy Valley does not publish its prices.
How do I contact Footsteps at Happy Valley?
Use Footsteps at Happy Valley's website, thespringsliving.com/senior-living/or/happy-valley/se-172nd-avenue, or visit at 13160 Se 172nd Ave, Happy Valley, OR 97086.
How Lilisity works. The only scores or rankings Lilisity publishes are the Top Communities list and the Excellence Awards, both built from phone-verified resident and family interviews. Communities can pay Lilisity a flat monthly fee to manage their own listing: photos, prices, contact details, and receiving the inquiries families choose to send them. The fee is the same no matter how many families contact them or move in. Senior Living Alliance, which runs Lilisity, offers the same listing to its member communities as part of their membership; members pay SLA for its resident and family interview program. No community pays Lilisity per inquiry, per referral or per move-in. Payment never changes a testimonial, a rating, or the order of search results. The "Nearby Senior Living Alliance communities" box shows member communities only. How we verify testimonials · How we are paid