Lilisity

Independent Living and Assisted Living

Kingston Residence Of Santa Fe

2400 Legacy Ct, Santa Fe, NM 87507 · Map
Licensed for 105 residents

State license active
Is this your community? Claim this listing

Kingston Residence Of Santa Fe is a state-licensed independent living, assisted living community in Santa Fe, New Mexico. It is licensed for 105 residents. Lilisity publishes no score or ranking for this community; the details below come from the state licensing record.

Independent LivingAlso assisted living
105 residentsLicensed capacity
State licensedAssisted living facility

Prices

This community does not publish its prices.

Lilisity’s independent report

What the public record shows

Gathered by Lilisity from state and federal sources. Communities can’t edit this part of the page.

State inspections

40Survey reports posted
48Deficiencies cited

Latest survey report shown: Jul 5, 2023. See the record

License

Active, 105 residents

Assisted Living Facility 5796.

Side by side with nearby communities

The 4 nearest communities that offer assisted living, by straight-line distance. Prices are starting prices each community publishes; we never show estimates.

CommunityDistanceLicensed capacityPublished starting priceLicenseInspection citations
Kingston Residence Of Santa Fe this community105Not publishedActive48 deficiencies in 40 reports
Vista Hermosa0.3 mi14Not publishedActive0 deficiencies in 0 reports
Las Soleras Senior Living1.8 mi86Not publishedActive0 deficiencies in 0 reports
Bee Hive Homes of Santa Fe2.5 mi15Not publishedActive0 deficiencies in 0 reports
MorningStar Assisted Living and Memory Care of Santa Fe2.9 mi103Not publishedActive0 deficiencies in 0 reports
State inspection record48 deficiencies in 40 reports
NM license number
5796
Licensed beds (state listing)
105
Latest survey report shown
July 5, 2023
Survey reports posted
40
Deficiencies cited
48
Substantiated complaints
5
Unsubstantiated complaints
16

Survey reports

  • July 5, 2023 (Complaint survey): 2 deficiencies cited, complaint 67420 investigated with deficiencies cited, complaint 58347 investigated with no deficiencies cited report (Internet Archive copy of 6RMN11.pdf)
    • Admissions and Discharge. The state found: “The facility failed to ensure for 1 (R #3) of 1 (R #3) resident that the discharge notice contained only information required by regulation, and did not include incorrect information regarding the residents right to appeal the discharge to the Department of Health.” 7.8.2.20 NMAC
    • Resident Rights. The rule: “All licensed facilities shall understand, protect and respect the rights of all residents.” A033, 7.8.2.33 NMAC
  • November 8, 2022: 3 deficiencies cited report (Internet Archive copy of P38O12.pdf)
    • Staff Qualifications. The rule: “A facility shall employ staff with the following qualifications.” 7.8.2.16 NMAC
    • Reporting of Incidents 7.8.2.32 NMAC
    • Medications. The rule: “Administration of medications or staff assistance with self-administration of medications shall be in accordance with state and federal laws.” 7.8.2.35 NMAC
  • February 1, 2022 (Full Onsite/Complaint survey): 10 deficiencies cited, complaint 45358 unsubstantiated, complaint 45455 unsubstantiated, complaint 53116 unsubstantiated, complaint 48235 unsubstantiated, complaint 56461 unsubstantiated report (Internet Archive copy of P38O11.pdf)
    • Staff Training 7.8.2.17 NMAC
    • Reporting of Incidents. The state found: “The facility failed to ensure for 2 (R# 1 & 5) of 5 (R #s 1-5) residents whose Internal Incident Reports were reviewed for compliance, that incidents of possible abuse, neglect, or exploitation, were reported to the Licensing Authority within 24 hours or the next business day, if it is a weekend or a holiday.” A032, 7.8.2.32 NMAC
    • Custodial Drug Permits. The state found: “The facility failed to ensure that oxygen cylinder tanks were stored securely and protected from accidental damage or dislocation.” 7.8.2.34 NMAC
    • Medications. The rule: “Administration of medications or staff assistance with self-administration of medications shall be in accordance with state and federal laws.” A035, 7.8.2.35 NMAC
    • Nutrition. The rule: “The facility shall provide planned and nutritionally balanced meals from the basic food groups in accordance with the “recommended daily dietary allowance” of the American dietetic association, the food and nutrition board of the national research council, or the national academy of sciences.” A036, 7.8.2.36 NMAC
    • Housekeeping Services. The rule: “The facility shall maintain the interior and exterior of the facility in a safe, clean, orderly and attractive manner.” A038, 7.8.2.38 NMAC
    • Maintenance of Building and Grounds. The rule: “The building(s) shall be maintained in good repair at all times.” A042, 7.8.2.42 NMAC
    • Hazardous Areas. The state found: “The facility failed to ensure that combustible items were not stored in a hazardous area with gas fueled heaters and hot water heaters.” A043, 7.8.2.43 NMAC
    • Lighting and Lighting Fixtures. The state found: “The facility failed to ensure that all emergency lights in the facility were in working order.” A047, 7.8.2.47 NMAC
    • Exits. The state found: “The facility failed to ensure that the exit routes were clear from obstructions.” 7.8.2.50 NMAC
  • August 11, 2020 (Offsite Surveillance survey): no deficiencies cited report (Internet Archive copy of 3F4811.pdf)
  • July 20, 2020 (Offsite Surveillance survey): no deficiencies cited report (Internet Archive copy of PK1C11.pdf)
Show all 40
  • July 1, 2020 (Offsite Surveillance survey): no deficiencies cited report (Internet Archive copy of P1JY11.pdf)
  • May 28, 2020 (Offsite Surveillance survey): no deficiencies cited report (Internet Archive copy of OJIT11.pdf)
  • May 5, 2020 (Offsite Surveillance survey): no deficiencies cited report (Internet Archive copy of 971J11.pdf)
  • April 16, 2020 (Offsite Surveillance survey): no deficiencies cited report (Internet Archive copy of TZS811.pdf)
  • April 1, 2020 (Offsite Surveillance survey): no deficiencies cited report (Internet Archive copy of FHX311.pdf)
  • March 17, 2020 (Onsite Surveillance survey): no deficiencies cited report (Internet Archive copy of C6IT11.pdf)
  • February 14, 2020 (Revisit/Follow-Up survey): no deficiencies cited report (Internet Archive copy of 4ROO12.pdf)
  • October 29, 2019 (Full-Onsite/Complaint survey): 2 deficiencies cited, complaint 40598 substantiated report (Internet Archive copy of 4ROO11.pdf)
    • Staff Qualifications. The rule: “A facility shall employ staff with the following qualifications.” 7.8.2.16 NMAC
    • Admissions and Discharge. The rule: “The facility shall complete an admission agreement for each resident.” 7.8.2.20 NMAC
  • April 17, 2017 (complaint survey): no deficiencies cited, complaint 30261 unsubstantiated report (Internet Archive copy of U62I11.pdf)
  • March 17, 2017 (complaint survey): no deficiencies cited, complaint 30129 unsubstantiated report (Internet Archive copy of DOB511.pdf)
  • March 17, 2017: revisit report report (Internet Archive copy of 78ZZ12.pdf)
  • March 13, 2017 (complaint investigation): complaint 29862 substantiated report (Internet Archive copy of 78ZZ22.pdf)
  • July 14, 2016 (complaint survey): no deficiencies cited, complaint 30003 investigated (outcome in the report), complaint 30004 unsubstantiated report (Internet Archive copy of RLWJ11.pdf)
  • November 24, 2015 (full onsite survey): 8 deficiencies cited, complaint 29801 unsubstantiated, complaint 29845 unsubstantiated report (Internet Archive copy of 78ZZ11.pdf)
    • General Licensing Requirements. The state found: “The facility failed to obtain an amended License from the Licensing Authority for a change of Administrator within ten (10) business days of the change in Administrators.” 7.8.2.8 NMAC
    • Staff Qualifications. The state found: “The facility failed to protect the safety and welfare of the 82 (R #1-82) residents identified on the Resident Census provided by the Acting Administrator (AA) on 11/19/15, by: 1) Not complying with the requirements of the Caregivers Criminal History Screening Requirements (CCHS) and the Employee Abuse Registry (EAR) for direct care staff and volunteers.” 7.8.2.16 NMAC
    • Staff Training 7.8.2.17 NMAC
    • Resident Records. The state found: “The facility failed to ensure resident records are complete and organized utilizing a table of contents identifying section contents.” 7.8.2.21 NMAC
    • Resident Evaluation. The state found: “The facility failed to ensure resident evaluations for 2 residents (R #2, 5) of 8 (R #1-8) residents, chosen for record review, are reviewed at a minimum of every 6 months or when there is a change in the residents condition.” 7.8.2.25 NMAC
    • Custodial Drug Permits. The rule: “A facility with two (2) or more residents that is licensed pursuant to this rule and that assists with self-administration or safeguards medications for residents shall have a current custodial drug permit issued by the state board of pharmacy.” 7.8.2.34 NMAC
    • Medications. The rule: “Administration of medications or staff assistance with self-administration of medications shall be in accordance with state and federal laws.” 7.8.2.35 NMAC
    • Nutrition. The state found: “The facility failed to post the weekly menu, ensure medications are not stored in the same refrigerator with food; and ensure sanitary practices in the food services department by: 1) Not ensuring all garbage and kitchen trash that is not disposed of through a garbage disposal unit is kept in watertight containers with a close-fitting cover.” 7.8.2.36 NMAC
  • November 18, 2015 (complaint investigation): 7 deficiencies cited, complaint 29862 substantiated report (Internet Archive copy of 78ZZ21.pdf)
    • Maintenance of Building and Grounds. The state found: “The facility failed to ensure abrupt changes in elevation of walking surfaces did not exceed 1/4 inch at door threshold leading into the stairwell.” 7.8.2.42 NMAC
    • Heating, Air-Conditioning and Ventilation. The state found: “The facility failed to ensure the ventilation system in the main dryer room was maintained and the area behind dryers were free from stored items.” 7.8.2.44 NMAC
    • Electrical System. The state found: “The facility failed to ensure electrical equipment and wiring is in accordance with NFPA 70 (National Electrical Code).” 7.8.2.48 NMAC
    • Fire Alarms, Smoke Detectors and Other Equipment. The state found: “The facility failed to ensure the fire alarm system and its components were being tested and inspected by a certified company at least every 12-months and was being maintained as required by NFPA 72 (National Fire Alarm Code).” 7.8.2.61 NMAC
    • Automatic Fire Protection (Sprinkler) System. The state found: “The facility failed to ensure the automatic fire sprinkler system was installed in the Records Storage room at the east end of the second floor corridor in Building A as required by NFPA 13, (Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems).” 7.8.2.62 NMAC
    • Fire Extinguishers. The state found: “The facility failed to assure a fire extinguisher was readily accessible and immediately available in the event of fire at the generator area, in accordance with NFPA 10, (Standard for Portable Fire Extinguishers).” 7.8.2.63 NMAC
    • Fire Drills. The state found: “The facility failed to ensure fire drills were conducted at least quarterly on every shift to assure preparedness for emergency response (Federal regulations require that fire drills shall not exceed 90-day spacing between drills on each shift).” 7.8.2.65 NMAC
  • May 26, 2015 (revisit survey): see the report report (Internet Archive copy of 47J912.pdf)
  • January 12, 2015 (complaint survey): complaint 29591 unsubstantiated report (Internet Archive copy of S_47J911.pdf)
  • January 12, 2015 (complaint survey): 1 deficiency cited, complaint 29591 unsubstantiated report (Internet Archive copy of 47J911.pdf)
    • Reporting of Incidents. The state found: “The facility failed to report an incident of potential exploitation against Resident #1 within 24 hours of being notified of the incidents.” 7.8.2.32 NMAC
  • March 27, 2013: 2 deficiencies cited, complaint unsubstantiated, complaint substantiated report (Internet Archive copy of S_FBN311.pdf)
    • Resident Rights. The rule: “All licensed facilities shall understand, protect and respect the rights of all residents.” 7.8.2.33 NMAC
    • Maintenance of Building and Grounds. The rule: “The building(s) shall be maintained in good repair at all times.” 7.8.2.42 NMAC
  • March 27, 2013: 2 deficiencies cited, complaint unsubstantiated, complaint substantiated report (Internet Archive copy of FBN311.pdf)
    • Resident Rights. The state found: “The facility failed to protect the resident's right to humane care by failing to adequately describe, execute and document daily services for one facility resident (Resident #1).” 7.8.2.33 NMAC
    • Maintenance of Building and Grounds. The state found: “The facility failed to ensure that the kitchen vent hood was functioning at optimum capacity.” 7.8.2.42 NMAC
  • July 26, 2012 (Complaint investigation): complaint 28244 substantiated, complaint 28191 unsubstantiated report (Internet Archive copy of 0VDX12.pdf)
  • December 19, 2011 (Complaint investigation): 1 deficiency cited, complaint 28244 substantiated, complaint 28191 unsubstantiated report (Internet Archive copy of 0VDX11.pdf)
    • Resident Rights. The state found: “The facility failed to ensure that residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) were provided with a safe environment.” 7.8.2.33 NMAC
  • May 3, 2010 (complaint survey): no deficiencies cited, complaint 27555 unsubstantiated report (Internet Archive copy of Z2RQ11.pdf)
  • April 8, 2010: see the report report (Internet Archive copy of S_O9EH11.pdf)
  • April 8, 2010: see the report report (Internet Archive copy of O9EH11.pdf)
  • April 6, 2010 (annual survey): 2 deficiencies cited report (Internet Archive copy of S_JC1D21.pdf)
    • Building Construction. The state found: “The facility failed to maintain a self closing device for the door to a hazardous area, as defined per NFPA 101 (Life Safety Code).” 7.8.2.41 NMAC
    • Fire Clearance and Inspections 7.8.2.60 NMAC
  • April 6, 2010 (annual survey): 2 deficiencies cited report (Internet Archive copy of JC1D21.pdf)
    • Building Construction. The state found: “The facility failed to report new construction to the Licensing Authority having jurisdiction.” 7.8.2.41 NMAC
    • Fire Clearance and Inspections. The state found: “The facility failed to ensure the fire alarm system and its heating/cooling fresh air vertical intakes between floors were installed in accordance with NFPA 72 (National Fire Alarm Code), NFPA 70 (National Electric Code) and NFPA 90A (HVAC SYSTEM COMPONENTS).” 7.8.2.60 NMAC
  • January 27, 2010 (complaint investigation): no deficiencies cited, complaint 27435 unsubstantiated report (Internet Archive copy of WU5311.pdf)
  • April 24, 2009 (annual life safety code survey): 1 deficiency cited report (Internet Archive copy of S_4VQY21.pdf)
    • Fire Clearance and Inspections 7.8.2.60 NMAC
  • April 23, 2009: see the report report (Internet Archive copy of S_QGZP11.pdf)
  • March 27, 2008: see the report report (Internet Archive copy of S_TXGV11.pdf)
  • August 22, 2007 (annual life safety code survey): 1 deficiency cited report (Internet Archive copy of S_7OM221.pdf)
    • Fire Alarms, Smoke Detectors and Other Equipment 7.8.2.61 NMAC
  • December 21, 2004: 1 deficiency cited report (Internet Archive copy of S_CIPP11.pdf)
    • Fire Extinguishers. The state found: “THE FACILITY FAILED TO | CONDUCT FIRE DRILLS FOR 3 OF 11 MONTHS OF 2004.” 7.8.2.63 NMAC
  • December 21, 2004: 3 deficiencies cited report (Internet Archive copy of S_BJ8D21.pdf)
    • Fire Clearance and Inspections 7.8.2.60 NMAC
    • Fire Alarms, Smoke Detectors and Other Equipment. The state found: “THE FACILITY DID NOT HAVE QUARTERLY FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM INSPECTION REPORTS AVAILABLE FOR | REVIEW.” 7.8.2.61 NMAC
    • Fire Extinguishers. The rule: “Fire extinguisher(s) must be located in the facility, as approved by the state fire marshal or the fire prevention authority with jurisdiction.” 7.8.2.63 NMAC
  • Date not read: see the report report (Internet Archive copy of S_7R7311.pdf)

The state’s listing for license 5796 (Internet Archive copy) →

New Mexico’s License Oversight Bureau posts each survey’s Statement of Deficiencies as a scanned PDF. We read the scans by OCR and show, for each report, the survey date, the kind of survey in the state’s words, each deficiency tag with the rule it cites and the state’s own one-sentence finding when OCR reads it whole. Each rule is named by its heading in New Mexico’s assisted living rules: 7.8.2 NMAC until June 30, 2024, and 8.370.14 NMAC (same section numbers) since July 1, 2024. The rules say: “If violations of this rule are cited, the facility will be provided with an official statement of deficiencies within 10 business days following the survey.” The facility’s plan of correction is printed in the right-hand column of the same report. The reports give no severity level for assisted living deficiencies, and the state’s site lists no fines or license actions. Revisit reports often repeat the complaint outcomes of the survey they follow up on; we count each complaint once. The state’s site (alf.hca.nm.gov) has not answered since at least September 2026, so we read the listing and reports from the Internet Archive’s copies, captured between January 16, 2026 and June 12, 2026. Reports the state posted after that are not shown. This community is licensed for 105 residents; larger communities are inspected and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: New Mexico Health Care Authority, Division of Health Improvement, License Oversight Bureau, read October 16, 2026. The report itself is the official record. Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.

License and ownershipActive license
License type
Assisted Living Facility
License number
5796
License status
Active
Licensed capacity
105

State listing as of April 2026. New Mexico HCA assisted living directory, archived copy.

Source: New Mexico state licensing records (agency listing), retrieved 2026-04-21. Licensing status is a matter of public record; it is not a quality rating.

Paying with Medicaid and other programsHow Medicaid pays for care in New Mexico, and other programs

How Medicaid pays for care in New Mexico

  • Turquoise Care Community Benefit (Agency-Based Community Benefit). Yes. New Mexico Medicaid's Community Benefit, provided through Turquoise Care managed care plans, lists assisted living as a covered service. (state page)

Ask the community whether it accepts Medicaid.

Questions to ask on a tour9 questions picked for this community from its record

Picked for this community from its record. Ask them in person and write down the answers.

  1. What does the base rate include, and when did rates last go up?
  2. How many caregivers are on duty during the day and at night?
  3. What happens if care needs increase? When would someone need to move?
  4. What fees are charged at move-in?
  5. How do you tell families about falls, illness or changes?
  6. How long have the executive director and the head of care been here?
  7. Who gives medications, and what training do they have?
  8. For what reasons can a resident be asked to leave?
  9. Is the apartment held during a hospital stay, and at what cost?
What we checked7 public sources we searched, with dates

Every public source we searched for this community. “Nothing on record” means we found no record that matched it. A record can be missed when a name or address differs.

SourceData as ofWhat we found
New Mexico Health Care Authority, Division of Health Improvement, License Oversight Bureau inspection recordsOct 16, 2026See above
U.S. Department of Labor wage and hour casesOct 15, 2026Nothing on record
OSHA workplace safety inspections since 2016Oct 15, 2026Nothing on record
HUD Multifamily Properties - AssistedJul 6, 2026Nothing on record
State Veterans Homes (NASVH directory)Sep 20, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Hospice - General InformationAug 19, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Home Health Care AgenciesMay 27, 2026Nothing on record
Common questionsAnswers to 4 questions families ask
What type of care does Kingston Residence Of Santa Fe provide?

Kingston Residence Of Santa Fe is licensed by the state of New Mexico for independent living, assisted living in Santa Fe, New Mexico. Its licensed capacity is 105 residents.

Does Lilisity rate Kingston Residence Of Santa Fe?

No. We publish state licensing details for Kingston Residence Of Santa Fe but no score, rating, or ranking. Only communities on the Top Communities list or with a Senior Living Alliance Excellence Award, both based on phone-verified resident and family interviews, are ranked.

How much does Kingston Residence Of Santa Fe cost?

Kingston Residence Of Santa Fe does not publish its prices.

How do I contact Kingston Residence Of Santa Fe?

Use Kingston Residence Of Santa Fe's website, kingstonresidenceofsantafe.com, or visit at 2400 Legacy Ct, Santa Fe, NM 87507.

Choosing assisted livingOur care guide: what to look for, what it costs, how families pay, and more questions to ask (PDF)

Report a wrong fact

How Lilisity works. The only scores or rankings Lilisity publishes are the Top Communities list and the Excellence Awards, both built from phone-verified resident and family interviews. Communities can pay Lilisity a flat monthly fee to manage their own listing: photos, prices, contact details, and receiving the inquiries families choose to send them. The fee is the same no matter how many families contact them or move in. Senior Living Alliance, which runs Lilisity, offers the same listing to its member communities as part of their membership; members pay SLA for its resident and family interview program. No community pays Lilisity per inquiry, per referral or per move-in. Payment never changes a testimonial, a rating, or the order of search results. The "Nearby Senior Living Alliance communities" box shows member communities only. How we verify testimonials · How we are paid