Lilisity

Assisted Living and Memory Care

New Journey Residence

303 Hat Trick Avenue, Eveleth, MN 55734 · Map
Licensed for 20 residents · NEW JOURNEY RESIDENCE

State license active
Is this your community? Claim this listing

New Journey Residence is a state-licensed assisted living, memory care community in Eveleth, Minnesota. It is licensed for 20 residents. Lilisity publishes no score or ranking for this community; the details below come from the state licensing record.

Assisted LivingAlso memory care
20 residentsLicensed capacity
State licensedAssisted living facility dementia care
$2,200 to $4,800/moTypical assisted living start in Minnesota, from 74 communities that publish prices

Prices

This community does not publish its prices.

Area costs

Assisted Living in Minnesota typically starts at $2,200 to $4,800 a month. Based on 74 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price.
Memory Care in Minnesota typically starts at $3,900 to $8,600 a month. Based on 40 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price.

Lilisity’s independent report

What the public record shows

Gathered by Lilisity from state and federal sources. Communities can’t edit this part of the page.

State inspections

0Substantiated investigations

Last evaluation: Jul 31, 2025. See the record

License

Active, 20 residents

Assisted Living Facility Dementia Care 423205, current license dated Jan 1, 2026. Licensee NEW JOURNEY RESIDENCE.

Nearest emergency room

14.3 miles

Essentia Health Northern Pines Medical Center.

Side by side with nearby communities

The 4 nearest communities that offer assisted living, by straight-line distance. Prices are starting prices each community publishes; we never show estimates.

CommunityDistanceLicensed capacityPublished starting priceLicenseInspection citations
New Journey Residence this community20Not publishedActive0 substantiated
Virginia Carefree Living by Ox3.5 mi38Not publishedActive1 substantiated
Chestnut Grove4.3 mi20Not publishedActive0 substantiated
Diamond Willow Assisted Living4.8 mi26Not publishedActive1 substantiated
Edgewood Virginia I Senior Liv5.2 mi212Not publishedActive1 substantiated
State inspection record0 substantiated
Last evaluation
July 31, 2025
Evaluations on record
2
Investigations substantiated
0 kept 7 years
Inconclusive
0 kept 4 years
Unsubstantiated
1 kept 3 years

Most recent evaluation (July 31, 2025, state report 1NEZ11)

MDH: “******ATTENTION****** ASSISTED LIVING PROVIDER FOLLOW UP SURVEY WITH RE-ISSUE OF ORDERS INITIALCOMMENTS SL20846016-01 On 10/22/2025, the Minnesota Department of Health conducted a follow-up survey at the above provider to follow-up on orders issued pursuant to a survey completed on 7/29/25.”

Survey completed October 21, 2025: 14 correction orders

  • Tag 480: 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Subd. 1a (a-b) Minimum requirements; required food services (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Not reviewed during this survey. (a) Except as provided in paragraph (b), food must be prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code, Minnesota Rules, chapter 4626. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b), food must be prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code, Minnesota Rules, chapter 4626. [...]”

  • Tag 510: 144G.41 Subd. 3 Infection control program (re-issued) scope/level letter F · fine: $500.00 assessed
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Not reviewed during this survey. (a) All assisted living facilities must establish and maintain an infection control program that complies with accepted health care, medical, and nursing standards for infection control. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) All assisted living facilities must establish and maintain an infection control program that complies with accepted health care, medical, and nursing standards for infection control. [...]”

  • Tag 775: 144G.45 Subd. 2. (a) Fire protection and physical environment (re-issued) Level 3, isolated scope, scope/level letter G · correction period: Seven (7) days · fine: $1,000.00 assessed
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide facilities that were not a distinct hazard to life.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to provide facilities that were not a distinct hazard to life. This had the potential to directly affect a limited number of residents and staff. [...]”

    Rule cited: “Each assisted living facility must comply with the State Fire Code in Minnesota Rules, chapter 7511, and:”

  • Tag 810: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (b-f) Fire protection and physical environment (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Not reviewed during this survey. (b) Each assisted living facility shall develop and maintain fire safety and evacuation plans. The plans shall include but are not limited to: (1) location and number of resident sleeping rooms; (2) staff actions to be taken in the event of a fire or similar emergency; (3) fire protection procedures necessary for residents; and (4) procedures for resident movement, evacuation, or relocation during a fire or similar emergency including the identification of [...]”

    Rule cited: “(b) Each assisted living facility shall develop and maintain fire safety and evacuation plans. [...]”

  • Tag 1500: 144G.63 Subd. 5 Required annual training (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Not reviewed during this survey. (a) All staff that perform direct services must complete at least eight hours of annual training for each 12 months of employment. The training may be obtained from the facility or another source and must include topics relevant to the provision of assisted living services. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) All staff that perform direct services must complete at least eight hours of annual training for each 12 months of employment. [...]”

Show all 14
  • Tag 1650: 144G.70 Subd. 4 (f) Service plan, implementation and revisions to (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Not reviewed during this survey. (f) The service plan must include: (1) a description of the services to be provided, the fees for services, and the frequency of each service, according to the resident's current assessment and resident preferences; (2) the identification of staff or categories of staff who will provide the services; (3) the schedule and methods of monitoring assessments of the resident; (4) the schedule and methods of monitoring staff providing services; and (5) a contingency [...]”

    Rule cited: “(f) The service plan must include: (1) a description of the services to be provided, the fees for services, and the frequency of each service, according to the resident's current assessment and resident preferences; (2) the identification of staff or [...]”

  • Tag 1820: 144G.71 Subd. 13 Prescriptions (re-issued) scope/level letter D
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Not reviewed during this survey. There must be a current written or electronically recorded prescription as defined in section 151.01, subdivision 16a, for all prescribed medications that the assisted living facility is managing for the resident. This MN Requirement is not met as evidenced by: Not reviewed during this survey.”

    Rule cited: “There must be a current written or electronically recorded prescription as defined in section 151.01, subdivision 16a, for all prescribed medications that the assisted living facility is managing for the resident.”

  • Tag 1880: 144G.71 Subd. 19 Storage of medications (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Not reviewed during this survey. An assisted living facility must store all prescription medications in securely locked and substantially constructed compartments according to the manufacturer's directions and permit only authorized personnel to have access. This MN Requirement is not met as evidenced by: Not reviewed during this survey.”

    Rule cited: “An assisted living facility must store all prescription medications in securely locked and substantially constructed compartments according to the manufacturer's directions and permit only authorized personnel to have access.”

  • Tag 1890: 144G.71 Subd. 20 Prescription drugs (re-issued) scope/level letter E
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Not reviewed during this survey. A prescription drug, prior to being set up for immediate or later administration, must be kept in the original container in which it was dispensed by the pharmacy bearing the original prescription label with legible information including the expiration or beyond-use date of a time-dated drug. This MN Requirement is not met as evidenced by: Not reviewed during this survey.”

    Rule cited: “A prescription drug, prior to being set up for immediate or later administration, must be kept in the original container in which it was dispensed by the pharmacy bearing the original prescription label with legible information including the expiration or [...]”

  • Tag 1910: 144G.71 Subd. 22 Disposition of medications (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Not reviewed during this survey. (a) Any current medications being managed by the assisted living facility must be provided to the resident when the resident's service plan ends or medication management services are no longer part of the service plan. Medications for a resident who is deceased or that have been discontinued or have expired may be provided for disposal. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) Any current medications being managed by the assisted living facility must be provided to the resident when the resident's service plan ends or medication management services are no longer part of the service plan. [...]”

  • Tag 1950: 144G.72 Subd. 4 Administration of treatments and therapy (re-issued) scope/level letter D
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Not reviewed during this survey. Ordered or prescribed treatments or therapies must be administered by a nurse, physician, or other licensed health professional authorized to perform the treatment or therapy, or may be delegated or assigned to unlicensed personnel by the licensed health professional according to the appropriate practice standards for delegation or assignment. [...]”

    Rule cited: “Ordered or prescribed treatments or therapies must be administered by a nurse, physician, or other licensed health professional authorized to perform the treatment or therapy, or may be delegated or assigned to unlicensed personnel by the licensed health [...]”

  • Tag 1970: 144G.72 Subd. 6 Treatment and therapy orders (re-issued) scope/level letter D
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Not reviewed during this survey. There must be an up-to-date written or electronically recorded order from an authorized prescriber for all treatments and therapies. The order must contain the name of the resident, a description of the treatment or therapy to be provided, and the frequency, duration, and other information needed to administer the treatment or therapy. Treatment and therapy orders must be renewed at least every 12 months. [...]”

    Rule cited: “There must be an up-to-date written or electronically recorded order from an authorized prescriber for all treatments and therapies. [...]”

  • Tag 2320: 144G.91 Subd. 4 (b) Appropriate care and services (re-issued) scope/level letter E
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Not reviewed during this survey. (b) Residents have the right to receive health care and other assisted living services with continuity from people who are properly trained and competent to perform their duties and in sufficient numbers to adequately provide the services agreed to in the assisted living contract and the service plan. This MN Requirement is not met as evidenced by: Not reviewed during this survey.”

    Rule cited: “(b) Residents have the right to receive health care and other assisted living services with continuity from people who are properly trained and competent to perform their duties and in sufficient numbers to adequately provide the services agreed to in the [...]”

  • Tag 2410: 144G.91 Subd. 13 Personal and treatment privacy (re-issued) scope/level letter D
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Not reviewed during this survey. (a) Residents have the right to consideration of their privacy, individuality, and cultural identity as related to their social, religious, and psychological well-being. Staff must respect the privacy of a resident's space by knocking on the door and seeking consent before entering, except in an emergency or unless otherwise documented in the resident's service plan. (b) Residents have the right to have and use a lockable door to the resident's unit. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) Residents have the right to consideration of their privacy, individuality, and cultural identity as related to their social, religious, and psychological well-being. [...]”

Survey completed July 31, 2025: 14 correction orders

  • Tag 480: 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Subd. 1a (a-b) Minimum requirements; required food services Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Please refer to the FBEIR for any compliance dates
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code. This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death), and is issued at a widespread scope (when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b), food must be prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code, Minnesota Rules, chapter 4626. [...]”

  • Tag 510: 144G.41 Subd. 3 Infection control program Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days · fine: $500.00 assessed
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to establish and maintain an infection control program to comply with accepted health care, medical, and nursing standards for infection control for three of three employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-E, ULP-G, ULP-J) during personal cares.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to establish and maintain an infection control program to comply with accepted health care, medical, and nursing standards for infection control for three of three employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-E, ULP-G, ULP-J) during personal cares. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) All assisted living facilities must establish and maintain an infection control program that complies with accepted health care, medical, and nursing standards for infection control. [...]”

  • Tag 775: 144G.45 Subd. 2. (a) Fire protection and physical environment Level 3, isolated scope, scope/level letter G · correction period: Immediate · fine: $1,000.00 assessed
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide facilities that were not a distinct hazard to life.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to provide facilities that were not a distinct hazard to life. This had the potential to directly affect a limited number of residents and staff. [...]”

    Rule cited: “Each assisted living facility must comply with the State Fire Code in Minnesota Rules, chapter 7511, and:”

  • Tag 810: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (b-f) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop the fire safety and evacuation plan with required content

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to develop the fire safety and evacuation plan with required content and provide required training. This had the potential to directly affect all residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(b) Each assisted living facility shall develop and maintain fire safety and evacuation plans. [...]”

  • Tag 1500: 144G.63 Subd. 5 Required annual training Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure employees received all the required content for annual training for each 12 months of employment for two of three employees (clinical nurse supervisor (CNS)-B, licensed practical nurse (LPN)-F).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure employees received all the required content for annual training for each 12 months of employment for two of three employees (clinical nurse supervisor (CNS)-B, licensed practical nurse (LPN)-F). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) All staff that perform direct services must complete at least eight hours of annual training for each 12 months of employment. [...]”

Show all 14
  • Tag 1650: 144G.70 Subd. 4 (f) Service plan, implementation and revisions to Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the service plan included the required content for two of two residents (R2, R3).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the service plan included the required content for two of two residents (R2, R3). This had the potential to affect all residents. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(f) The service plan must include: (1) a description of the services to be provided, the fees for services, and the frequency of each service, according to the resident's current assessment and resident preferences; (2) the identification of staff or [...]”

  • Tag 1820: 144G.71 Subd. 13 Prescriptions Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure current written or electronically recorded prescriptions were obtained for one of two residents (R3) who received medication management services.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure current written or electronically recorded prescriptions were obtained for one of two residents (R3) who received medication management services. [...]”

    Rule cited: “There must be a current written or electronically recorded prescription as defined in section 151.01, subdivision 16a, for all prescribed medications that the assisted living facility is managing for the resident.”

  • Tag 1880: 144G.71 Subd. 19 Storage of medications Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure medications were securely stored and only authorized personnel had access to medications being stored by the licensee for one of one medication refrigerator.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure medications were securely stored and only authorized personnel had access to medications being stored by the licensee for one of one medication refrigerator. [...]”

    Rule cited: “An assisted living facility must store all prescription medications in securely locked and substantially constructed compartments according to the manufacturer's directions and permit only authorized personnel to have access.”

  • Tag 1890: 144G.71 Subd. 20 Prescription drugs Level 2, pattern scope, scope/level letter E · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to date time-sensitive medications with opened and expiration dates for one of one medication cart whose medications were stored by the licensee.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to date time-sensitive medications with opened and expiration dates for one of one medication cart whose medications were stored by the licensee. In addition, the licensee failed to monitor for expired medications for one of one of medication cart that provided storage for medications. [...]”

    Rule cited: “A prescription drug, prior to being set up for immediate or later administration, must be kept in the original container in which it was dispensed by the pharmacy bearing the original prescription label with legible information including the expiration or [...]”

  • Tag 1910: 144G.71 Subd. 22 Disposition of medications Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to document in the resident record all of the required content in the disposition of medications for one of one resident (R1) upon discharge.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to document in the resident record all of the required content in the disposition of medications for one of one resident (R1) upon discharge. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) Any current medications being managed by the assisted living facility must be provided to the resident when the resident's service plan ends or medication management services are no longer part of the service plan. [...]”

  • Tag 1950: 144G.72 Subd. 4 Administration of treatments and therapy Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) prepared in writing specific instructions for each resident and documented those instructions for one of one resident (R3) receiving blood glucose monitoring.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) prepared in writing specific instructions for each resident and documented those instructions for one of one resident (R3) receiving blood glucose monitoring. [...]”

    Rule cited: “Ordered or prescribed treatments or therapies must be administered by a nurse, physician, or other licensed health professional authorized to perform the treatment or therapy, or may be delegated or assigned to unlicensed personnel by the licensed health [...]”

  • Tag 1970: 144G.72 Subd. 6 Treatment and therapy orders Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure current written or electronically recorded prescriptions were obtained for one of two residents (R3) who received treatment services.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure current written or electronically recorded prescriptions were obtained for one of two residents (R3) who received treatment services. [...]”

    Rule cited: “There must be an up-to-date written or electronically recorded order from an authorized prescriber for all treatments and therapies. [...]”

  • Tag 2320: 144G.91 Subd. 4 (b) Appropriate care and services Level 2, pattern scope, scope/level letter E · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide care and services according to acceptable health care medical or nursing standards for medication administration by licensed practical nurse (LPN)-F for one of one resident (R2) whose medications were not administered as directed.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to provide care and services according to acceptable health care medical or nursing standards for medication administration by licensed practical nurse (LPN)-F for one of one resident (R2) whose medications were not administered as directed. In addition, LPN-F failed to ensure privacy was maintained for one of one resident (R3) during insulin administration and blood glucose (sugar) monitoring. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(b) Residents have the right to receive health care and other assisted living services with continuity from people who are properly trained and competent to perform their duties and in sufficient numbers to adequately provide the services agreed to in the [...]”

  • Tag 2410: 144G.91 Subd. 13 Personal and treatment privacy Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure privacy was maintained for one of one resident (R2) who had a urinary catheter.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure privacy was maintained for one of one resident (R2) who had a urinary catheter. This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death), and was issued at an isolated scope (when one or a limited number of residents are affected [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) Residents have the right to consideration of their privacy, individuality, and cultural identity as related to their social, religious, and psychological well-being. [...]”

From MDH’s letter: the letter says the facility is in substantial compliance.

Food and beverage inspection (included in this report): Food and beverage inspection report included

Fines assessed by MDH

  • Tag 510 (144g.41 Subd. 3 - Infection Control Program): $500.00
  • Tag 775 (144g.45 Subd. 2. (a) - Fire Protection And Physical Environment): $1,000.00

Total fines assessed, as printed in the letter: $1,000.00.

Earlier evaluations (1)
  • June 9, 2022: report 1TQ611 · 35 correction orders
    Details

    Survey completed August 30, 2022: 17 correction orders

    • Tag 470: 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Minimum requirements (re-issued) scope/level letter F
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “No further action required.”

      Rule cited: “(11) develop and implement a staffing plan for determining its staffing level that: (i) includes an evaluation, to be conducted at least twice a year, of the appropriateness of staffing levels in the facility; (ii) ensures sufficient staffing at all times to [...]”

    • Tag 510: 144G.41 Subd. 3 Infection control program (re-issued) scope/level letter D
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “No further action required.”

      Rule cited: “(a) All assisted living facilities must establish and maintain an infection control program that complies with accepted health care, medical, and nursing standards for infection control. [...]”

    • Tag 550: 144G.41 Subd. 7 Resident grievances; reporting maltreatment (re-issued) scope/level letter F
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “No further action required.”

      Rule cited: “All facilities must post in a conspicuous place information about the facilities' grievance procedure, and the name, telephone number, and e-mail contact information for the individuals who are responsible for handling resident grievances. [...]”

    • Tag 680: 144G.42 Subd. 10 Disaster planning and emergency preparedness (re-issued) scope/level letter F
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “No further action required.”

      Rule cited: “(a) The facility must meet the following requirements: (1) have a written emergency disaster plan that contains a plan for evacuation, addresses elements of sheltering in place, identifies temporary relocation sites, and details staff assignments in the event [...]”

    • Tag 800: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (4) Fire protection and physical environment (re-issued) Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Two (2) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide the physical environment in a continuous state of good repair and operation with regard to the health, safety, and well-being of the residents.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to provide the physical environment in a continuous state of good repair and operation with regard to the health, safety, and well-being of the residents. This had the potential to directly affect all residents and staff. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(4) keep the physical environment, including walls, floors, ceiling, all furnishings, grounds, systems, and equipment in a continuous state of good repair and operation with regard to the health, safety, comfort, and well-being of the residents in accordance [...]”

    Show all 17
    • Tag 900: 144G.50 Subdivision 1 Contract required (re-issued) scope/level letter D
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “No further action required.”

      Rule cited: “(a) An assisted living facility may not offer or provide housing or assisted living services to any individual unless it has executed a written contract with the resident. [...]”

    • Tag 1470: 144G.63 Subd. 2 Content of required orientation (re-issued) scope/level letter F
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “No further action required.”

      Rule cited: “(a) The orientation must contain the following topics: (1) an overview of this chapter; (2) an introduction and review of the facility's policies and procedures related to the provision of assisted living services by the individual staff person; (3) handling [...]”

    • Tag 1640: 144G.70 Subd. 4 (a-e) Service plan, implementation and revisions to (re-issued) scope/level letter D
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “No further action required.”

      Rule cited: “(a) No later than 14 calendar days after the date that services are first provided, an assisted living facility shall finalize a current written service plan. [...]”

    • Tag 1650: 144G.70 Subd. 4 (f) Service plan, implementation and revisions to (re-issued) scope/level letter F
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “No further action required.”

      Rule cited: “(f) The service plan must include: (1) a description of the services to be provided, the fees for services, and the frequency of each service, according to the resident's current assessment and resident preferences; (2) the identification of staff or [...]”

    • Tag 1790: 144G.71 Subd. 10 Medication management for residents who will (re-issued) scope/level letter F
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “No further action required.”

      Rule cited: “(2) for unplanned time away, when the pharmacy is not able to provide the medications, a licensed nurse or unlicensed personnel shall provide medications in amounts and dosages needed for the length of the anticipated absence, not to exceed seven calendar [...]”

    • Tag 1820: 144G.71 Subd. 13 Prescriptions (re-issued) scope/level letter D
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “No further action required.”

      Rule cited: “There must be a current written or electronically recorded prescription as defined in section 151.01, subdivision 16a, for all prescribed medications that the assisted living facility is managing for the resident.”

    • Tag 1830: 144G.71 Subd. 14 Renewal of prescriptions (re-issued) scope/level letter D
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “No further action required.”

      Rule cited: “Prescriptions must be renewed at least every 12 months or more frequently as indicated by the assessment in subdivision 2. Prescriptions for controlled substances must comply with chapter 152.”

    • Tag 1890: 144G.71 Subd. 20 Prescription drugs (re-issued) scope/level letter E
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “No further action required.”

      Rule cited: “A prescription drug, prior to being set up for immediate or later administration, must be kept in the original container in which it was dispensed by the pharmacy bearing the original prescription label with legible information including the expiration or [...]”

    • Tag 1940: 144G.72 Subd. 3 Individualized treatment or therapy managemen (re-issued) scope/level letter D
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “No further action required.”

      Rule cited: “For each resident receiving management of ordered or prescribed treatments or therapy services, the assisted living facility must prepare and include in the service plan a written statement of the treatment or therapy services that will be provided to the [...]”

    • Tag 2110: 144G.82 Subd. 3 Policies (re-issued) scope/level letter F
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “No further action required.”

      Rule cited: “(a) In addition to the policies and procedures required in the licensing of all facilities, the assisted living facility with dementia care licensee must develop and implement policies and procedures that address the: (1) philosophy of how services are [...]”

    • Tag 2170: 144G.84 SERVICES FOR RESIDENTS WITH DEMENTIA (re-issued) scope/level letter F
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “No further action required.”

      Rule cited: “(b) Each resident must be evaluated for activities according to the licensing rules of the facility. [...]”

    • Tag 2350: 144G.91 Subd. 7 Courteous treatment (re-issued) scope/level letter D
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “No further action required.”

      Rule cited: “Residents have the right to be treated with courtesy and respect, and to have the resident's property treated with respect.”

    Survey completed June 9, 2022: 18 correction orders

    • Tag 470: 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Minimum requirements Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the required staffing plan was developed, implemented, and evaluated for appropriateness of staffing levels as required.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the required staffing plan was developed, implemented, and evaluated for appropriateness of staffing levels as required. This had the potential to affect all 16 current residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(11) develop and implement a staffing plan for determining its staffing level that: (i) includes an evaluation, to be conducted at least twice a year, of the appropriateness of staffing levels in the facility; (ii) ensures sufficient staffing at all times to [...]”

    • Tag 510: 144G.41 Subd. 3 Infection control program Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure infection control standards were followed for two of two unlicensed personnel (ULP-D, ULP-E), during toileting assistance and for one of one licensed practical nurse (LPN)-H, during catheter cares.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure infection control standards were followed for two of two unlicensed personnel (ULP-D, ULP-E), during toileting assistance and for one of one licensed practical nurse (LPN)-H, during catheter cares. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) All assisted living facilities must establish and maintain an infection control program that complies with accepted health care, medical, and nursing standards for infection control. [...]”

    • Tag 550: 144G.41 Subd. 7 Resident grievances; reporting maltreatment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to post the required information related to the grievance procedure to include the email contact information for the individuals who are responsible for handling grievances.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to post the required information related to the grievance procedure to include the email contact information for the individuals who are responsible for handling grievances. This had the potential to affect all current residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”

      Rule cited: “All facilities must post in a conspicuous place information about the facilities' grievance procedure, and the name, telephone number, and e-mail contact information for the individuals who are responsible for handling resident grievances. [...]”

    • Tag 680: 144G.42 Subd. 10 Disaster planning and emergency preparedness Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop and post a written emergency disaster plan with all the required content.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to develop and post a written emergency disaster plan with all the required content. This had the potential to affect all 16 residents. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) The facility must meet the following requirements: (1) have a written emergency disaster plan that contains a plan for evacuation, addresses elements of sheltering in place, identifies temporary relocation sites, and details staff assignments in the event [...]”

    • Tag 800: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (4) Fire protection and physical environment Level 3, widespread scope, scope/level letter I · correction period: IMMEDIATE
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide the physical environment in a continuous state of good repair and operation with regard to the health, safety, and well-being of the residents.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to provide the physical environment in a continuous state of good repair and operation with regard to the health, safety, and well-being of the residents. This had the potential to directly affect all residents and staff. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(4) keep the physical environment, including walls, floors, ceiling, all furnishings, grounds, systems, and equipment in a continuous state of good repair and operation with regard to the health, safety, comfort, and well-being of the residents in accordance [...]”

    Show all 18
    • Tag 810: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (b)-(f) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide the required plans and drills for fire safety and evacuation.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on document review and interview, the licensee failed to provide the required plans and drills for fire safety and evacuation. This had the potential to directly affect all residents and staff. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(b) Each assisted living facility shall develop and maintain fire safety and evacuation plans. [...]”

    • Tag 900: 144G.50 Subdivision 1 Contract required Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to execute a written contract with the required content for one of two residents (R5) with records reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview, and record review, the licensee failed to execute a written contract with the required content for one of two residents (R5) with records reviewed. This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death), and was issued at an isolated scope (when one or a limited number of residents are [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) An assisted living facility may not offer or provide housing or assisted living services to any individual unless it has executed a written contract with the resident. [...]”

    • Tag 1470: 144G.63 Subd. 2 Content of required orientation Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure orientation to assisted living statutes included all the required content for one of two employees registered nurse (RN)-B with records reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure orientation to assisted living statutes included all the required content for one of two employees registered nurse (RN)-B with records reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) The orientation must contain the following topics: (1) an overview of this chapter; (2) an introduction and review of the facility's policies and procedures related to the provision of assisted living services by the individual staff person; (3) handling [...]”

    • Tag 1640: 144G.70 Subd. 4 (a-e) Service plan, implementation and revisions to Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure a service plan was revised to reflect current services provided for one of two residents (R5), with records reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure a service plan was revised to reflect current services provided for one of two residents (R5), with records reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) No later than 14 calendar days after the date that services are first provided, an assisted living facility shall finalize a current written service plan. [...]”

    • Tag 1650: 144G.70 Subd. 4 (f) Service plan, implementation and revisions to Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure service plans included the required content for two of two residents (R2, R5) with records reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure service plans included the required content for two of two residents (R2, R5) with records reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(f) The service plan must include: (1) a description of the services to be provided, the fees for services, and the frequency of each service, according to the resident's current assessment and resident preferences; (2) the identification of staff or [...]”

    • Tag 1790: 144G.71 Subd. 10 Medication management for residents who will Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) developed written procedures for the unlicensed personnel (ULP) providing medications for residents having unplanned time away when the licensed nurse was not available.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) developed written procedures for the unlicensed personnel (ULP) providing medications for residents having unplanned time away when the licensed nurse was not available. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(2) for unplanned time away, when the pharmacy is not able to provide the medications, a licensed nurse or unlicensed personnel shall provide medications in amounts and dosages needed for the length of the anticipated absence, not to exceed seven calendar [...]”

    • Tag 1820: 144G.71 Subd. 13 Prescriptions Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure current written or electronically recorded prescriptions were obtained for one of two residents (R5) with records reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure current written or electronically recorded prescriptions were obtained for one of two residents (R5) with records reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “There must be a current written or electronically recorded prescription as defined in section 151.01, subdivision 16a, for all prescribed medications that the assisted living facility is managing for the resident.”

    • Tag 1830: 144G.71 Subd. 14 Renewal of prescriptions Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to renew prescriptions at least every 12 months for one of one resident (R2) with

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to renew prescriptions at least every 12 months for one of one resident (R2) with records reviewed. This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death) and was issued at an isolated scope (when one or a limited number of residents are affected or one [...]”

      Rule cited: “Prescriptions must be renewed at least every 12 months or more frequently as indicated by the assessment in subdivision 2. Prescriptions for controlled substances must comply with chapter 152.”

    • Tag 1890: 144G.71 Subd. 20 Prescription drugs Level 2, pattern scope, scope/level letter E · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to date time-sensitive medications with an opened or expiration date for three of three residents (R3, R4, R6) with records reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to date time-sensitive medications with an opened or expiration date for three of three residents (R3, R4, R6) with records reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “A prescription drug, prior to being set up for immediate or later administration, must be kept in the original container in which it was dispensed by the pharmacy bearing the original prescription label with legible information including the expiration or [...]”

    • Tag 1940: 144G.72 Subd. 3 Individualized treatment or therapy managemen Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to prepare and include in the service plan a written statement of the treatment or therapy services that will be provided to the resident for one of two residents (R5) receiving treatments.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to prepare and include in the service plan a written statement of the treatment or therapy services that will be provided to the resident for one of two residents (R5) receiving treatments. [...]”

      Rule cited: “For each resident receiving management of ordered or prescribed treatments or therapy services, the assisted living facility must prepare and include in the service plan a written statement of the treatment or therapy services that will be provided to the [...]”

    • Tag 2110: 144G.82 Subd. 3 Policies Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the required dementia care policies and procedures were provided to each resident and/or the resident's legal and designated representative at the time of move-in.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the required dementia care policies and procedures were provided to each resident and/or the resident's legal and designated representative at the time of move-in. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) In addition to the policies and procedures required in the licensing of all facilities, the assisted living facility with dementia care licensee must develop and implement policies and procedures that address the: (1) philosophy of how services are [...]”

    • Tag 2170: 144G.84 SERVICES FOR RESIDENTS WITH DEMENTIA Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop comprehensive evaluation activity plan for two of two residents (R2, R5) who received services under an assisted living with dementia care license.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to develop comprehensive evaluation activity plan for two of two residents (R2, R5) who received services under an assisted living with dementia care license. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(b) Each resident must be evaluated for activities according to the licensing rules of the facility. [...]”

    • Tag 2350: 144G.91 Subd. 7 Courteous treatment Level 2, pattern scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based in observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of two residents (R2, R4) were treated with dignity and respect when R2's urinary drainage bag was exposed in common areas, and licensed practical nurse (LPN)-H administered treatments to R4 in a public setting. [...]”

      Rule cited: “Residents have the right to be treated with courtesy and respect, and to have the resident's property treated with respect.”

Unsubstantiated investigations (1)
  • April 4, 2024 · report HL208469707M
    Details

    Survey completed March 27, 2024: no correction orders issued.

What the levels and scopes mean (MDH’s words)

Level 2: “a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death”

Level 3: “a violation that harmed a resident's health or safety, not including serious injury, impairment, or death, or a violation that has the potential to lead to serious injury, impairment, or death”

Isolated scope: “when one or a limited number of residents are affected or one or a limited number of staff are involved, or the situation has occurred only occasionally”

Pattern scope: “when more than a limited number of residents are affected, more than a limited number of staff are involved, or the situation has occurred repeatedly; but is not found to be pervasive”

Widespread scope: “when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has affected or has the potential to affect a large portion or all of the residents”

Summaries are ours and are marked “Summary”; quoted text is MDH’s own, shortened where marked [...]. Read the full reports at the links above or search every report on MDH’s site.

What these terms mean

MDH: “An evaluation is a process regulated by the division to ensure licensees comply with the laws, rules, and certifications for the type of care and services authorized under their license/certification.”

“An investigation may occur when the division is notified that care and services are not being provided by licensees as required by law. This may include allegations of abuse, neglect, or financial misuse.”

For maltreatment, Minnesota law defines substantiated as “a preponderance of the evidence shows that an act that meets the definition of maltreatment occurred” and inconclusive as “less than a preponderance of evidence to show that maltreatment did or did not occur” (Minn. Stat. 626.5572).

Correction orders, as MDH explains on each state form: “Tag numbers have been assigned to Minnesota State Statutes for Assisted Living Facilities.” “The letter in the left column is used for tracking purposes and reflects the scope and level issued pursuant to 144G.31 subd. 1, 2, and 3.” MDH adds that there is no requirement to submit a plan of correction for violations of Minnesota state statutes.

MDH keeps investigation results for seven years when allegations are substantiated, four years when inconclusive, and three years when unsubstantiated, so the counts cover different periods. This community is licensed for 20 residents; larger communities are evaluated and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division, data as of September 28, 2026. Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.

License and ownershipActive license, licensee NEW JOURNEY RESIDENCE
License type
Assisted Living Facility Dementia Care
License number
423205
License status
Active
Current license dated
2026-01-01
Licensed capacity
20
Licensee
NEW JOURNEY RESIDENCE
Administrator/Authorized Agent
Jennifer Aysta

Source: Minnesota state licensing records (agency listing), retrieved 2026-09-09. Licensing status is a matter of public record; it is not a quality rating.

Administrator/Authorized Agent name from the Minnesota licensing record, as of Sep 9, 2026.

Paying with Medicaid and other programsHow Medicaid pays for care in Minnesota, and other programs

How Medicaid pays for care in Minnesota

  • Elderly Waiver (EW), customized living services. Minnesota's Elderly Waiver, part of Medical Assistance (Minnesota Medicaid), can pay for "customized living" services, and a provider of those services must hold an assisted living license (or meet certain exceptions). You must qualify for Medical Assistance and need a nursing-home level of care. (state page)

Ask the community whether it accepts Medicaid.

Location and nearby careNearest hospital 14.3 mi, nursing home 0.8 mi, pharmacy 3.9 mi
Nearest hospital with an emergency room
Essentia Health Northern Pines Medical Center, Aurora. 14.3 miles away, straight line.
Nearest Medicare nursing home
The Waterview Woods LLC, Eveleth. 0.8 miles away, straight line.
Nearest home health agency office
Range Regional Health Services, Hibbing. 19.3 miles away, straight line. Agencies travel to clients, so ask which ones serve this address.
Nearest pharmacy
Walgreens. 3.9 miles away, straight line. From OpenStreetMap, which does not list every pharmacy, so one may be closer.
Area
USDA classes ZIP code 55734 as micropolitan (micropolitan core).
Dialysis within 15 miles
Fmc Dialysis - Eveleth, Eveleth, 0.6 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 1 of 5 stars)
Hospice
5 Medicare hospices tell CMS they serve ZIP code 55734.
Range Regional Health Services, office in Hibbing, 19.3 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 5 of 5 stars)
Nearest geriatric medicine practice
Polinsky Medical Rehabilitation Center, Duluth. 45.5 miles away, straight line. 3 geriatric medicine doctors listed there.

Distances are straight lines from the community, not driving distance. Hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors come from CMS provider data (CMS, hospital list updated Jul 22, 2026). Star ratings are CMS’s own.

Emergency and natural hazard riskFEMA overall risk relatively high; outside FEMA's high-risk flood areas

Public hazard maps for this location. Ask the community about its emergency plan, its generator and where residents would go in an evacuation.

Flood zone
Outside the high and moderate risk flood areas on FEMA's flood map (Zone X, minimal flood hazard, or not studied). (FEMA flood map)
FEMA National Risk Index
Overall: relatively high. By hazard: inland flooding relatively moderate, wildfire very low, tornado relatively low, heat wave relatively moderate, earthquake very low. These are FEMA’s ratings for the census tract, compared with tracts nationwide. (FEMA, December 2025)

A flood zone describes the map at this point, not the building's elevation. In an emergency, follow the local emergency management agency.

Questions to ask on a tour10 questions picked for this community from its record

Picked for this community from its record. Ask them in person and write down the answers.

  1. The current license dates from 2026. Has the owner or operator changed recently?
  2. What does the base rate include, and when did rates last go up?
  3. How many caregivers work in memory care during the day, the evening and overnight, and for how many residents?
  4. What dementia training does each caregiver get before working alone, and every year after?
  5. How do staff respond when a resident is agitated, frightened or tries to leave?
  6. How many caregivers are on duty during the day and at night?
  7. What happens if care needs increase? When would someone need to move?
  8. What fees are charged at move-in?
  9. How do you tell families about falls, illness or changes?
  10. How long have the executive director and the head of care been here?
What we checked11 public sources we searched, with dates

Every public source we searched for this community. “Nothing on record” means we found no record that matched it. A record can be missed when a name or address differs.

SourceData as ofWhat we found
Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division inspection recordsSep 28, 2026See above
U.S. Department of Labor wage and hour casesOct 15, 2026Nothing on record
OSHA workplace safety inspections since 2016Oct 15, 2026Nothing on record
FEMA flood mapSee above
USDA wildfire riskApr 15, 2026Not shown: FEMA rates wildfire risk here very low
FEMA National Risk IndexSee above
CMS hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors; OpenStreetMap pharmaciesSee above
HUD Multifamily Properties - AssistedJul 6, 2026Nothing on record
State Veterans Homes (NASVH directory)Sep 20, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Hospice - General InformationAug 19, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Home Health Care AgenciesMay 27, 2026Nothing on record
Common questionsAnswers to 4 questions families ask
What type of care does New Journey Residence provide?

New Journey Residence is licensed by the state of Minnesota for assisted living, memory care in Eveleth, Minnesota. Its licensed capacity is 20 residents.

Does Lilisity rate New Journey Residence?

No. We publish state licensing details for New Journey Residence but no score, rating, or ranking. Only communities on the Top Communities list or with a Senior Living Alliance Excellence Award, both based on phone-verified resident and family interviews, are ranked.

How much does New Journey Residence cost?

Assisted Living in Minnesota typically starts at $2,200 to $4,800 a month. Based on 74 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price. New Journey Residence does not publish its prices.

How do I contact New Journey Residence?

Visit New Journey Residence at 303 Hat Trick Avenue, Eveleth, MN 55734.

Choosing assisted livingOur care guide: what to look for, what it costs, how families pay, and more questions to ask (PDF)

Report a wrong fact

How Lilisity works. The only scores or rankings Lilisity publishes are the Top Communities list and the Excellence Awards, both built from phone-verified resident and family interviews. Communities can pay Lilisity a flat monthly fee to manage their own listing: photos, prices, contact details, and receiving the inquiries families choose to send them. The fee is the same no matter how many families contact them or move in. Senior Living Alliance, which runs Lilisity, offers the same listing to its member communities as part of their membership; members pay SLA for its resident and family interview program. No community pays Lilisity per inquiry, per referral or per move-in. Payment never changes a testimonial, a rating, or the order of search results. The "Nearby Senior Living Alliance communities" box shows member communities only. How we verify testimonials · How we are paid