Assisted Living and Memory Care
Edgewood Virginia I Senior Liv
705 17th Street North, Virginia, MN 55792 · Map
Licensed for 212 residents · EDGEWOOD VIRGINIA I SENIOR LIV
Edgewood Virginia I Senior Liv is a state-licensed assisted living, memory care community in Virginia, Minnesota. It is licensed for 212 residents. Lilisity publishes no score or ranking for this community; the details below come from the state licensing record.
Prices
This community does not publish its prices.
Area costs
Lilisity’s independent report
What the public record shows
Gathered by Lilisity from state and federal sources. Communities can’t edit this part of the page.
License
Active, 212 residents
Assisted Living Facility Dementia Care 421949, current license dated Sep 1, 2025. Licensee EDGEWOOD VIRGINIA I SENIOR LIV.
Nearest emergency room
14.8 miles
Essentia Health Northern Pines Medical Center.
Side by side with nearby communities
The 4 nearest communities that offer assisted living, by straight-line distance. Prices are starting prices each community publishes; we never show estimates.
| Community | Distance | Licensed capacity | Published starting price | License | Inspection citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edgewood Virginia I Senior Liv this community | 212 | Not published | Active | 1 substantiated | |
| Chestnut Grove | 1.1 mi | 20 | Not published | Active | 0 substantiated |
| Virginia Carefree Living by Ox | 1.7 mi | 38 | Not published | Active | 1 substantiated |
| Diamond Willow Assisted Living | 2.6 mi | 26 | Not published | Active | 1 substantiated |
| New Journey Residence | 5.2 mi | 20 | Not published | Active | 0 substantiated |
State inspection record1 substantiated
- Last evaluation
- December 11, 2024
- Evaluations on record
- 2
- Investigations substantiated
- 1 kept 7 years
- Inconclusive
- 1 kept 4 years
- Unsubstantiated
- 2 kept 3 years
Most recent evaluation (December 11, 2024, state report W8MN11)
MDH: “On December 9, 2024, through December 11, 2024, the Minnesota Department of Health conducted a full survey at the above provider.”
Survey completed December 11, 2024: 7 correction orders
- Tag 100: 144G.10 Subdivision 1 License required Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to demonstrate legal responsibility for the control and operation of the facility when the licensee allowed use of the facility space to operate a home health care and hospice agency.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to demonstrate legal responsibility for the control and operation of the facility when the licensee allowed use of the facility space to operate a home health care and hospice agency. This had the potential to affect all residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”
Rule cited: “(a)(1)Beginning August 1, 2021, no assisted living facility may operate in Minnesota unless it is licensed under this chapter. [...]”
- Tag 470: 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Minimum requirements Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Two (2) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the facility had sufficient staffing 24 hours per day to meet the scheduled and reasonably foreseeable unscheduled needs for one of two buildings (secured dementia care building).
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the facility had sufficient staffing 24 hours per day to meet the scheduled and reasonably foreseeable unscheduled needs for one of two buildings (secured dementia care building). This had the potential to affect all 40 residents who resided in the secured dementia care building. [...]”
Rule cited: “(11) develop and implement a staffing plan for determining its staffing level that: (i) includes an evaluation, to be conducted at least twice a year, of the appropriateness of staffing levels in the facility; (ii) ensures sufficient staffing at all times to [...]”
- Tag 480: 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Subd. 1a (a-b) Minimum requirements; required food services Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Please refer to the FBEIR for any compliance dates
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code. This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death), and is issued at a widespread scope (when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b), food must be prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code, Minnesota Rules, chapter 4626. [...]”
- Tag 630: 144G.42 Subd. 6 (b) Compliance with requirements for reporting ma Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure an individual abuse prevention plan (IAPP) was developed to include the required content for one of one resident (R2) who did not receive services, however, resided at the assisted living facility.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure an individual abuse prevention plan (IAPP) was developed to include the required content for one of one resident (R2) who did not receive services, however, resided at the assisted living facility. [...]”
Rule cited: “(b) The facility must develop and implement an individual abuse prevention plan for each vulnerable adult. [...]”
- Tag 780: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (1) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Two (2) day
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to comply with the requirements of the Minnesota State Fire Code.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to comply with the requirements of the Minnesota State Fire Code. This had the potential to directly affect all residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”
Rule cited: “for dwellings or sleeping units, as defined in the State Fire Code: (i) provide smoke alarms in each room used for sleeping purposes; (ii) provide smoke alarms outside each separate sleeping area in the immediate vicinity of bedrooms; (iii) provide smoke [...]”
- Tag 810: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (b-f) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop the fire safety and evacuation plan with required content and provide required training to residents.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to develop the fire safety and evacuation plan with required content and provide required training to residents. This had the potential to directly affect all residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”
Rule cited: “(b) Each assisted living facility shall develop and maintain fire safety and evacuation plans. [...]”
- Tag 1350: 144G.60 Subd. 5 Temporary staff Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure orientation to assisted living statutes included all the required content for one of one employee (registered nurse (RN)-M).
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure orientation to assisted living statutes included all the required content for one of one employee (registered nurse (RN)-M). [...]”
Rule cited: “When a facility contracts with a temporary staffing agency, those individuals must meet the same requirements required by this section for personnel employed by the facility and shall be treated as if they are staff of the facility.”
From MDH’s letter: the letter says the facility is in substantial compliance; no immediate fines.
Earlier evaluations (1)
- October 20, 2021: report CWIZ11 · 17 correction orders
Details
Survey completed January 12, 2022: 1 correction order
- Tag 970: 144.50 Subd. 5 Waivers of liability prohibited (re-issued) Level 1, widespread scope, scope/level letter C
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the Assisted Living contract did not include language waiving the facility's liability for health, safety, or personal property of a resident.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the Assisted Living contract did not include language waiving the facility's liability for health, safety, or personal property of a resident. This had the potential to affect all residents. [...]”
Rule cited: “The contract must not include a waiver of facility liability for the health and safety or personal property of a resident. [...]”
Survey completed October 21, 2021: 16 correction orders
- Tag 460: 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Minimum requirements Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide a means for residents residing in the memory care building to request assistance for health and safety needs as required.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to provide a means for residents residing in the memory care building to request assistance for health and safety needs as required. The licensee did not have a system in place for residents at the facility to request assistance for health and safety needs 24 hours a day, seven days a week. This had the potential to affect all 38 residents residing in the secured memory care building. [...]”
Rule cited: “(5) provide a means for residents to request assistance for health and safety needs 24 hours per day, seven days per week; (6) allow residents the ability to furnish and decorate the resident's unit within the terms of the assisted living contract; (7) permit [...]”
- Tag 470: 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Minimum requirements Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop and implement a staffing plan to determine its staffing level.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to develop and implement a staffing plan to determine its staffing level. This had the potential to affect all 142 residents. [...]”
Rule cited: “(11) develop and implement a staffing plan for determining its staffing level that: (i) includes an evaluation, to be conducted at least twice a year, of the appropriateness of staffing levels in the facility; (ii) ensures sufficient staffing at all times to [...]”
- Tag 480: 144G.41 Subd 1 (13) (i) (B) Minimum requirements Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code. This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death), and is issued at a widespread scope (when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has [...]”
Rule cited: “(13) offer to provide or make available at least the following services to residents: (i) at least three nutritious meals daily with snacks available seven days per week, according to the recommended dietary allowances in the United States Department of [...]”
- Tag 680: 144G.42 Subd. 10 Disaster planning and emergency preparedness Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop a written emergency disaster plan with all the required content.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to develop a written emergency disaster plan with all the required content. This had the potential to affect all current residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) The facility must meet the following requirements: (1) have a written emergency disaster plan that contains a plan for evacuation, addresses elements of sheltering in place, identifies temporary relocation sites, and details staff assignments in the event [...]”
- Tag 780: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (1) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide smoke alarms in locations that complied with fire protection requirements.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to provide smoke alarms in locations that complied with fire protection requirements. This had the potential to directly affect all residents and staff. [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) Each assisted living facility must comply with the State Fire Code in Minnesota Rules, chapter 7511, and: (1) for dwellings or sleeping units, as defined in the State Fire Code: (i) provide smoke alarms in each room used for sleeping purposes; (ii) [...]”
Show all 16
- Tag 800: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (4) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Two (2) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the facility failed to maintain the physical environment in a continuous state of good repair and operation.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain the physical environment in a continuous state of good repair and operation. This had the potential to directly affect all residents and staff. [...]”
Rule cited: “(4) keep the physical environment, including walls, floors, ceiling, all furnishings, grounds, systems, and equipment in a continuous state of good repair and operation with regard to the health, safety, comfort, and well-being of the residents in accordance [...]”
- Tag 900: 144G.50 Subdivision 1 Contract required Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop and execute
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to develop and execute a timely written contract to provide assisted living services for one of six residents (R6) with records reviewed. [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) An assisted living facility may not offer or provide housing or assisted living services to any individual unless it has executed a written contract with the resident. [...]”
- Tag 970: 144.50 Subd. 5 Waivers of liability prohibited Level 1, widespread scope, scope/level letter C · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the contract did not include language waiving the facility's liability for health, safety, or personal property of a resident.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the contract did not include language waiving the facility's liability for health, safety, or personal property of a resident. This had the potential to affect all residents. [...]”
Rule cited: “The contract must not include a waiver of facility liability for the health and safety or personal property of a resident. [...]”
- Tag 1470: 144G.63 Subd. 2 Content of required orientation Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure employees received orientation to assisted living facility licensing requirements and regulations for one of six employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-F) with employee records reviewed.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview, observation and record review, the licensee failed to ensure employees received orientation to assisted living facility licensing requirements and regulations for one of six employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-F) with employee records reviewed. [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) The orientation must contain the following topics: (1) an overview of this chapter; (2) an introduction and review of the facility's policies and procedures related to the provision of assisted living services by the individual staff person; (3) handling [...]”
- Tag 1620: 144G.70 Subd. 2 Initial reviews, assessments, and monitoring Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure licensed staff conducted resident monitoring and review as
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure licensed staff conducted resident monitoring and review as needed based on changes with resident needs for two of six residents (R6 and R7) with records reviewed. [...]”
Rule cited: “(c) Resident reassessment and monitoring must be conducted no more than 14 calendar days after initiation of services. [...]”
- Tag 1730: 144G.71 Subd. 5 Individualized medication management plan Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop and maintain a current individualized medication
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to develop and maintain a current individualized medication management record to include all required content for one of six residents (R7) with records reviewed. [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) For each resident receiving medication management services, the assisted living facility must prepare and include in the service plan a written statement of the medication management services that will be provided to the resident. [...]”
- Tag 1760: 144G.71 Subd. 8 Documentation of administration of medication Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure medications were administered via manufacturer's instructions for one of six resident (R7) with records reviewed.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure medications were administered via manufacturer's instructions for one of six resident (R7) with records reviewed. [...]”
Rule cited: “Each medication administered by the assisted living facility staff must be documented in the resident's record. The documentation must include the signature and title of the person who administered the medication. [...]”
- Tag 1880: 144G.71 Subd. 19 Storage of medications Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure medications were stored according to manufacturer's
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure medications were stored according to manufacturer's instructions for one of three medication refrigerators. [...]”
Rule cited: “An assisted living facility must store all prescription medications in securely locked and substantially constructed compartments according to the manufacturer's directions and permit only authorized personnel to have access.”
- Tag 1890: 144G.71 Subd. 20 Prescription drugs Level 2, pattern scope, scope/level letter E · correction period: Seven (7) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure medications were maintained bearing the original prescription label with legible information, including the expiration date for time sensitive medications, for three of three residents (R7, R8, and R9) reviewed.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure medications were maintained bearing the original prescription label with legible information, including the expiration date for time sensitive medications, for three of three residents (R7, R8, and R9) reviewed. [...]”
Rule cited: “A prescription drug, prior to being set up for immediate or later administration, must be kept in the original container in which it was dispensed by the pharmacy bearing the original prescription label with legible information including the expiration or [...]”
- Tag 2040: 144G.81 Subdivision 1 Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the facility failed to provide a hazard vulnerability or safety risk assessment that included hazards identified on and around the property.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide a hazard vulnerability or safety risk assessment that included hazards identified on and around the property. Mitigation of hazards to protect residents from harm was not included in the plan. This had the potential to affect all dementia care residents. [...]”
Rule cited: “An assisted living facility with dementia care that has a secured dementia care unit must meet the requirements of section 144G.45 and the following additional requirements: (1) a hazard vulnerability assessment or safety risk must be performed on and around [...]”
- Tag 2110: 144G.82 Subd. 3 Policies Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop and implement all required policies and procedures related to dementia care.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to develop and implement all required policies and procedures related to dementia care. This had the potential to affect all residents. [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) In addition to the policies and procedures required in the licensing of all facilities, the assisted living facility with dementia care licensee must develop and implement policies and procedures that address the: (1) philosophy of how services are [...]”
From MDH’s letter: no immediate fines.
- Tag 970: 144.50 Subd. 5 Waivers of liability prohibited (re-issued) Level 1, widespread scope, scope/level letter C
Substantiated investigations (state reports)
- November 7, 2023 · report HL307385523C
Details
Survey completed September 19, 2023: 3 correction orders
- Tag 250: 144G.20 Subdivision 1 Conditions Level 3, widespread scope, scope/level letter I
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee provided inaccurate information to Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) personnel and performed acts detrimental to the health and welfare of residents due to lack of implementation of the Center for Disease Control (CDC) and MDH recommendations to contain a highly contagious bacterial infection.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record reviewed, the licensee provided inaccurate information to Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) personnel and performed acts detrimental to the health and welfare of residents due to lack of implementation of the Center for Disease Control (CDC) and MDH recommendations to contain a highly contagious bacterial infection. This practice impacted all 167 residents, staff and local community. [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) The commissioner may refuse to grant a provisional license, refuse to grant a license as a result of a change in ownership, refuse to renew a license, suspend or revoke a license, or impose a conditional license if the owner, controlling individual, or [...]”
- Tag 510: 144G.41 Subd. 3 Infection control program Level 3, widespread scope, scope/level letter I
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to implement enhanced barrier precautions for two of two positive Multidrug-resistant Organisms (MDRO's) and Carbapenemase-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) residents (R1, R3), which impacted spread to one confirmed resident (R2), potentially all 166 other residents and other community facilities.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to implement enhanced barrier precautions for two of two positive Multidrug-resistant Organisms (MDRO's) and Carbapenemase-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) residents (R1, R3), which impacted spread to one confirmed resident (R2), potentially all 166 other residents and other community facilities. In addition, staff failed to perform adequate hand hygiene and provide standard precautions for other residents. [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) All assisted living facilities must establish and maintain an infection control program that complies with accepted health care, medical, and nursing standards for infection control. [...]”
- Tag 2340: 144G.91 Subd. 6 Participation in care and service planning Level 3, widespread scope, scope/level letter I
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to inform residents of a highly contagious bacterial infection identified within the facility to provide residents the opportunity to discuss their care and treatment options with
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to inform residents of a highly contagious bacterial infection identified within the facility to provide residents the opportunity to discuss their care and treatment options with appropriate caregivers for 166 out of 167 residents. [...]”
Rule cited: “Residents have the right to actively participate in the planning, modification, and evaluation of their care and services. [...]”
- Tag 250: 144G.20 Subdivision 1 Conditions Level 3, widespread scope, scope/level letter I
Inconclusive investigations (1)
- January 30, 2025 · report HL307386201M · MDH finding: Inconclusive
Details
Allegation, as written: “The alleged perpetrator (AP), a licensed practical nurse (LPN) at the facility, financially exploited resident #1 and resident #2 when she took the residents' narcotic pain medication for her own use.”
“The Minnesota Department of Health determined financial exploitation was inconclusive.”
Summary: MDH looked into an allegation and found: financial exploitation inconclusive.
MDH’s conclusion, as written: “The Minnesota Department of Health determined financial exploitation was inconclusive. While both resident #1 and resident #2 had discrepancies in their narcotic medication counts, it was unable to be determined what happened to the medications and there was not a preponderance of evidence that the AP/LPN took the medications.”
Action taken by facility: “The facility suspended the AP/LPN and investigated the incident. The facility contacted law enforcement and made a MAARC report. Upon completion of the investigation, the AP was terminated. All employees were retrained on medication administration practices.”
Action taken by MDH: “No further action taken at this time.”
Survey completed December 4, 2024: no correction orders issued.
Unsubstantiated investigations (2)
- February 12, 2026 · report HL307387982M · MDH finding: Not Substantiated
Details
Allegation, as written: “The facility neglected the resident when the resident missed doses of her anti-psychotic medication. As a result, the resident's mental health declined requiring hospitalization.”
“The Minnesota Department of Health determined neglect was not substantiated.”
Summary: MDH looked into an allegation and found: neglect not substantiated.
MDH’s conclusion, as written: “The Minnesota Department of Health determined neglect was not substantiated. Although the resident's anti-psychotic medication required a 3 milligram (mg) to be given in conjunction with a 9 mg dose to total 12 mg, the facility made attempts to reorder the 3 mg dose. The medication was not available is a 12 mg dose form. The resident had a history of hallucinations and delusions. During the timeframe of the missed 3 mg doses, the resident's records did not indicate behaviors of delusions or hallucinations until the day the resident transferred to the emergency room for psychiatric evaluation.”
Action taken by facility: “The facility attempted to reorder the resident's 3 mg dose of anti-psychotic medication. The facility conducted an internal investigation when the resident reported concerns, assessed the resident, and coordinated transfer to the emergency room for psychiatric evaluation.”
Action taken by MDH: “No further action taken at this time.”
Survey completed December 30, 2025: no correction orders issued.
- February 12, 2026 · report HL307388383M · MDH finding: Not Substantiated
Details
Allegation, as written: “The alleged perpetrator (AP) abused the resident when the AP grabbed the resident's wrists while the resident was combative during toileting services. As a result, the resident sustained arm skin tears, and a contusion (bruise).”
“The Minnesota Department of Health determined abuse was not substantiated.”
Summary: MDH looked into an allegation and found: abuse not substantiated.
MDH’s conclusion, as written: “The Minnesota Department of Health determined abuse was not substantiated. The resident had behaviors, and at times struck out at staff during cares. The AP stated she held onto the resident's hands, not wrists, as the resident struck out to avoid being struck. The AP stated her grip was not tight, lasted 30 seconds to one minute, the resident was still able to move her arms, and stated there was no redness afterwards. A ULP (unlicensed personnel) stated she felt the AP held the resident's wrists "a little too tight" to avoid being struck, and said the resident was able to move her arms during the AP's actions. The resident was "swatting" at the AP and the ULP during evening cares. A nurse assessed the resident, and the nurse stated there was no redness and/or injury. In addition, the resident had a previous fall two days prior. [...]”
Action taken by facility: “The facility conducted an internal investigation. The AP was provided re-education related to resident behaviors and strategies for residents with anxiety, agitation, aggressive language and behaviors, redirections, and managing caregiver stress and burnout. The AP was also assigned to work on a different side of memory care.”
Action taken by MDH: “No further action taken at this time.”
Survey completed December 30, 2025: no correction orders issued.
What the levels and scopes mean (MDH’s words)
Level 1: “a violation that has no potential to cause more than a minimal impact on the resident and does not affect health or safety”
Level 2: “a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death”
Level 3: “a violation that harmed a resident's health or safety, not including serious injury, impairment, or death, or a violation that has the potential to lead to serious injury, impairment, or death”
Isolated scope: “when one or a limited number of residents are affected or one or a limited number of staff are involved, or the situation has occurred only occasionally”
Pattern scope: “when more than a limited number of residents are affected, more than a limited number of staff are involved, or the situation has occurred repeatedly; but is not found to be pervasive”
Widespread scope: “when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has affected or has the potential to affect a large portion or all of the residents”
Summaries are ours and are marked “Summary”; quoted text is MDH’s own, shortened where marked [...]. Read the full reports at the links above or search every report on MDH’s site.
What these terms mean
MDH: “An evaluation is a process regulated by the division to ensure licensees comply with the laws, rules, and certifications for the type of care and services authorized under their license/certification.”
“An investigation may occur when the division is notified that care and services are not being provided by licensees as required by law. This may include allegations of abuse, neglect, or financial misuse.”
For maltreatment, Minnesota law defines substantiated as “a preponderance of the evidence shows that an act that meets the definition of maltreatment occurred” and inconclusive as “less than a preponderance of evidence to show that maltreatment did or did not occur” (Minn. Stat. 626.5572).
Correction orders, as MDH explains on each state form: “Tag numbers have been assigned to Minnesota State Statutes for Assisted Living Facilities.” “The letter in the left column is used for tracking purposes and reflects the scope and level issued pursuant to 144G.31 subd. 1, 2, and 3.” MDH adds that there is no requirement to submit a plan of correction for violations of Minnesota state statutes.
MDH keeps investigation results for seven years when allegations are substantiated, four years when inconclusive, and three years when unsubstantiated, so the counts cover different periods. This community is licensed for 212 residents; larger communities are evaluated and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division, data as of September 28, 2026. Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.
License and ownershipActive license, licensee EDGEWOOD VIRGINIA I SENIOR LIV
- License type
- Assisted Living Facility Dementia Care
- License number
- 421949
- License status
- Active
- Current license dated
- 2025-09-01
- Licensed capacity
- 212
- Licensee
- EDGEWOOD VIRGINIA I SENIOR LIV
- County
- Saint Louis County
- Administrator/Authorized Agent
- Lindsey Christenson
Source: Minnesota state licensing records (agency listing), retrieved 2026-09-09. Licensing status is a matter of public record; it is not a quality rating.
Administrator/Authorized Agent name from the Minnesota licensing record, as of Sep 9, 2026.
Paying with Medicaid and other programsHow Medicaid pays for care in Minnesota, and other programs
How Medicaid pays for care in Minnesota
- Elderly Waiver (EW), customized living services. Minnesota's Elderly Waiver, part of Medical Assistance (Minnesota Medicaid), can pay for "customized living" services, and a provider of those services must hold an assisted living license (or meet certain exceptions). You must qualify for Medical Assistance and need a nursing-home level of care. (state page)
Ask the community whether it accepts Medicaid.
Staff pay and workplace safety1 OSHA inspection, no violations cited
Federal records about how the employer here treats its staff.
OSHA workplace safety inspections
OSHA inspects workplaces for staff safety, such as lifting, needles, chemicals and workplace violence. It does not inspect resident care.
- Mar 8, 2017: complaint inspection, partial (safety). Case closed Mar 14, 2017. No violations cited. OSHA record. OSHA recorded the employer as 94855 - Edgewood Virginia I Senior Living LLC.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor OSHA enforcement data, as of Oct 15, 2026, inspections since 2016. Penalties can change while a case is open or contested.
Location and nearby careNearest hospital 14.8 mi, nursing home 0.5 mi, pharmacy 0.6 mi
- Nearest hospital with an emergency room
- Essentia Health Northern Pines Medical Center, Aurora. 14.8 miles away, straight line.
- Nearest Medicare nursing home
- Essentia Health Virginia Care Cent, Virginia. 0.5 miles away, straight line.
- Nearest home health agency office
- Aveanna Home Health, Hibbing. 20.0 miles away, straight line. Agencies travel to clients, so ask which ones serve this address.
- Nearest pharmacy
- Essentia Health Virginia Clinic Pharmacy. 0.6 miles away, straight line. From OpenStreetMap, which does not list every pharmacy, so one may be closer.
- Area
- USDA classes ZIP code 55792 as micropolitan (micropolitan core).
- Dialysis within 15 miles
- Fmc Dialysis - Eveleth, Eveleth, 5.3 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 1 of 5 stars)
- Hospice
- 5 Medicare hospices tell CMS they serve ZIP code 55792.
Range Regional Health Services, office in Hibbing, 20.1 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 5 of 5 stars) - Nearest geriatric medicine practice
- Polinsky Medical Rehabilitation Center, Duluth. 50.6 miles away, straight line. 3 geriatric medicine doctors listed there.
Distances are straight lines from the community, not driving distance. Hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors come from CMS provider data (CMS, hospital list updated Jul 22, 2026). Star ratings are CMS’s own.
Emergency and natural hazard riskFEMA overall risk relatively high; outside FEMA's high-risk flood areas
Public hazard maps for this location. Ask the community about its emergency plan, its generator and where residents would go in an evacuation.
- Flood zone
- Outside the high and moderate risk flood areas on FEMA's flood map (Zone X, minimal flood hazard, or not studied). (FEMA flood map)
- FEMA National Risk Index
- Overall: relatively high. By hazard: inland flooding relatively moderate, wildfire very low, tornado relatively low, heat wave relatively high. These are FEMA’s ratings for the census tract, compared with tracts nationwide. (FEMA, December 2025)
A flood zone describes the map at this point, not the building's elevation. In an emergency, follow the local emergency management agency.
Questions to ask on a tour10 questions picked for this community from its record
Picked for this community from its record. Ask them in person and write down the answers.
- The current license dates from 2025. Has the owner or operator changed recently?
- What does the base rate include, and when did rates last go up?
- How many caregivers work in memory care during the day, the evening and overnight, and for how many residents?
- What dementia training does each caregiver get before working alone, and every year after?
- How do staff respond when a resident is agitated, frightened or tries to leave?
- How many caregivers are on duty during the day and at night?
- What happens if care needs increase? When would someone need to move?
- What fees are charged at move-in?
- How do you tell families about falls, illness or changes?
- How long have the executive director and the head of care been here?
What we checked12 public sources we searched, with dates
Every public source we searched for this community. “Nothing on record” means we found no record that matched it. A record can be missed when a name or address differs.
| Source | Data as of | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division inspection records | Sep 28, 2026 | See above |
| U.S. Department of Labor wage and hour cases | Oct 15, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| OSHA workplace safety inspections since 2016 | Oct 15, 2026 | See above |
| FEMA flood map | See above | |
| USDA wildfire risk | Apr 15, 2026 | Not shown: FEMA rates wildfire risk here very low |
| FEMA National Risk Index | See above | |
| CMS hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors; OpenStreetMap pharmacies | See above | |
| HUD Multifamily Properties - Assisted | Jul 6, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| State Veterans Homes (NASVH directory) | Sep 20, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| CMS Hospice - General Information | Aug 19, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| CMS Home Health Care Agencies | May 27, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| The community’s own website | No plain statements of services found |
Common questionsAnswers to 4 questions families ask
What type of care does Edgewood Virginia I Senior Liv provide?
Edgewood Virginia I Senior Liv is licensed by the state of Minnesota for assisted living, memory care in Virginia, Minnesota. Its licensed capacity is 212 residents.
Does Lilisity rate Edgewood Virginia I Senior Liv?
No. We publish state licensing details for Edgewood Virginia I Senior Liv but no score, rating, or ranking. Only communities on the Top Communities list or with a Senior Living Alliance Excellence Award, both based on phone-verified resident and family interviews, are ranked.
How much does Edgewood Virginia I Senior Liv cost?
Assisted Living in Minnesota typically starts at $2,200 to $4,800 a month. Based on 74 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price. Edgewood Virginia I Senior Liv does not publish its prices.
How do I contact Edgewood Virginia I Senior Liv?
Use Edgewood Virginia I Senior Liv's website, edgewoodhealthcare.com/community/mn-virginia-edgewood, or visit at 705 17th Street North, Virginia, MN 55792.
How Lilisity works. The only scores or rankings Lilisity publishes are the Top Communities list and the Excellence Awards, both built from phone-verified resident and family interviews. Communities can pay Lilisity a flat monthly fee to manage their own listing: photos, prices, contact details, and receiving the inquiries families choose to send them. The fee is the same no matter how many families contact them or move in. Senior Living Alliance, which runs Lilisity, offers the same listing to its member communities as part of their membership; members pay SLA for its resident and family interview program. No community pays Lilisity per inquiry, per referral or per move-in. Payment never changes a testimonial, a rating, or the order of search results. The "Nearby Senior Living Alliance communities" box shows member communities only. How we verify testimonials · How we are paid