Lilisity

Assisted Living

Mia's House St Cloud

2607 15th Avenue Se, St. Cloud, MN 56304 · Map
Licensed for 3 residents · MIA'S HOUSE ST. CLOUD

State license active
Is this your community? Claim this listing

Mia's House St Cloud is a state-licensed assisted living community in St. Cloud, Minnesota. It is licensed for 3 residents. Lilisity publishes no score or ranking for this community; the details below come from the state licensing record.

Assisted LivingCare offered
3 residentsLicensed capacity
State licensedAssisted living facility
$2,200 to $4,800/moTypical assisted living start in Minnesota, from 74 communities that publish prices

Prices

This community does not publish its prices.

Area costs

Assisted Living in Minnesota typically starts at $2,200 to $4,800 a month. Based on 74 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price.

Lilisity’s independent report

What the public record shows

Gathered by Lilisity from state and federal sources. Communities can’t edit this part of the page.

State inspections

0Substantiated investigations

Last evaluation: Oct 4, 2024. See the record

License

Active, 3 residents

Assisted Living Facility 422737, current license dated Nov 1, 2025. Licensee MIA'S HOUSE ST. CLOUD.

Nearest emergency room

3.6 miles

Centracare - St. Cloud Hospital, rated 4 of 5 stars by CMS.

Side by side with nearby communities

The 4 nearest communities that offer assisted living, by straight-line distance. Prices are starting prices each community publishes; we never show estimates.

CommunityDistanceLicensed capacityPublished starting priceLicenseInspection citations
Mia's House St Cloud this community3Not publishedActive0 substantiated
The Sanctuary at St Cloud0.4 mi137Not publishedActive5 substantiated
St Scholastica Convent0.6 mi72Not publishedActive0 substantiated
Benedict Court0.6 mi43Not publishedActive0 substantiated
Benedict Homes0.8 mi27Not publishedActive0 substantiated
State inspection record0 substantiated
Last evaluation
October 4, 2024
Evaluations on record
1
Investigations substantiated
0 kept 7 years
Inconclusive
0 kept 4 years
Unsubstantiated
0 kept 3 years

Most recent evaluation (October 4, 2024, state report 2VS311)

MDH: “On March 17, 2025 through April 3, 2025, the Minnesota Department of Health conducted a follow-up survey at the above provider to follow-up on orders issued pursuant to a survey completed on October 3, 2024.”

Survey completed April 3, 2025: 13 correction orders

  • Tag 470: 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Minimum requirements (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    Rule cited: “(11) develop and implement a staffing plan for determining its staffing level that: (i) includes an evaluation, to be conducted at least twice a year, of the appropriateness of staffing levels in the facility; (ii) ensures sufficient staffing at all times to [...]”

  • Tag 480: 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Subd. 1a (a-b) Minimum requirements; required food services (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    Rule cited: “(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b), food must be prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code, Minnesota Rules, chapter 4626. [...]”

  • Tag 660: 144G.42 Subd. 9 Tuberculosis prevention and control (re-issued) scope/level letter D
    Details

    Rule cited: “(a) The facility must establish and maintain a comprehensive tuberculosis infection control program according to the most current tuberculosis infection control guidelines issued by the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Division [...]”

  • Tag 780: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (1) Fire protection and physical environment (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    Rule cited: “for dwellings or sleeping units, as defined in the State Fire Code: (i) provide smoke alarms in each room used for sleeping purposes; (ii) provide smoke alarms outside each separate sleeping area in the immediate vicinity of bedrooms; (iii) provide smoke [...]”

  • Tag 810: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (b-f) Fire protection and physical environment (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    Rule cited: “(b) Each assisted living facility shall develop and maintain fire safety and evacuation plans. [...]”

Show all 13
  • Tag 1290: 144G.60 Subdivision 1 Background studies required (re-issued) scope/level letter G · fine: $3,000.00 assessed
    Details

    Rule cited: “(a) Employees, contractors, and regularly scheduled volunteers of the facility are subject to the background study required by section 144.057 and may be disqualified under chapter 245C. [...]”

  • Tag 1470: 144G.63 Subd. 2 Content of required orientation (re-issued) scope/level letter D
    Details

    Rule cited: “(a) The orientation must contain the following topics: (1) an overview of this chapter; (2) an introduction and review of the facility's policies and procedures related to the provision of assisted living services by the individual staff person; (3) handling [...]”

  • Tag 1540: 144G.64 (a) TRAINING IN DEMENTIA CARE REQUIRED (re-issued) scope/level letter D
    Details

    Rule cited: “(3) for assisted living facilities with dementia care, direct-care employees must have completed at least eight hours of initial training on topics specified under paragraph (b) within 80 working hours of the employment start date. [...]”

  • Tag 1610: 144G.70 Subd. 2 (a-b) Initial reviews, assessments, and monitoring (re-issued) Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure a registered nurse (RN) conducted a comprehensive nursing assessment for one of one resident (R4).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure a registered nurse (RN) conducted a comprehensive nursing assessment for one of one resident (R4). This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety) and was issued at a widespread scope (when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has affected or has the potential to affect a large [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) Residents who are not receiving any assisted living services shall not be required to undergo an initial nursing assessment. [...]”

  • Tag 1620: 144G.70 Subd. 2 (c-e) Initial reviews, assessments, and monitoring (re-issued) scope/level letter D
    Details

    Rule cited: “(c) Resident reassessment and monitoring must be conducted no more than 14 calendar days after initiation of services. [...]”

  • Tag 1890: 144G.71 Subd. 20 Prescription drugs (re-issued) scope/level letter D
    Details

    Rule cited: “A prescription drug, prior to being set up for immediate or later administration, must be kept in the original container in which it was dispensed by the pharmacy bearing the original prescription label with legible information including the expiration or [...]”

  • Tag 1910: 144G.71 Subd. 22 Disposition of medications (re-issued) scope/level letter D
    Details

    Rule cited: “(a) Any current medications being managed by the assisted living facility must be provided to the resident when the resident's service plan ends or medication management services are no longer part of the service plan. [...]”

  • Tag 1940: 144G.72 Subd. 3 Individualized treatment or therapy managemen (re-issued) scope/level letter D
    Details

    Rule cited: “For each resident receiving management of ordered or prescribed treatments or therapy services, the assisted living facility must prepare and include in the service plan a written statement of the treatment or therapy services that will be provided to the [...]”

Survey completed December 19, 2024: 20 correction orders

  • Tag 470: 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Minimum requirements (re-issued) Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Two (2) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure that one or more persons were available 24 hours per day, seven days per week, who were responsible for responding to the requests of residents for assistance with health or safety needs.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure that one or more persons were available 24 hours per day, seven days per week, who were responsible for responding to the requests of residents for assistance with health or safety needs. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(11) develop and implement a staffing plan for determining its staffing level that: (i) includes an evaluation, to be conducted at least twice a year, of the appropriateness of staffing levels in the facility; (ii) ensures sufficient staffing at all times to [...]”

  • Tag 480: 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Subd. 1a (a-b) Minimum requirements; required food services (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “No further actions required.”

    Rule cited: “(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b), food must be prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code, Minnesota Rules, chapter 4626. [...]”

  • Tag 660: 144G.42 Subd. 9 Tuberculosis prevention and control (re-issued) scope/level letter D
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “No further actions required.”

    Rule cited: “(a) The facility must establish and maintain a comprehensive tuberculosis infection control program according to the most current tuberculosis infection control guidelines issued by the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Division [...]”

  • Tag 680: 144G.42 Subd. 10 Disaster planning and emergency preparedness (re-issued) Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to maintain a written emergency preparedness plan (EPP) with all the required content as defined in Appendix Z. This had the potential to affect all residents, staff, and visitors.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to maintain a written emergency preparedness plan (EPP) with all the required content as defined in Appendix Z. This had the potential to affect all residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) The facility must meet the following requirements: (1) have a written emergency disaster plan that contains a plan for evacuation, addresses elements of sheltering in place, identifies temporary relocation sites, and details staff assignments in the event [...]”

  • Tag 780: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (1) Fire protection and physical environment (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “No further actions required.”

    Rule cited: “for dwellings or sleeping units, as defined in the State Fire Code: (i) provide smoke alarms in each room used for sleeping purposes; (ii) provide smoke alarms outside each separate sleeping area in the immediate vicinity of bedrooms; (iii) provide smoke [...]”

Show all 20
  • Tag 810: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (b-f) Fire protection and physical environment (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “No further actions required.”

    Rule cited: “(b) Each assisted living facility shall develop and maintain fire safety and evacuation plans. [...]”

  • Tag 930: 144G.50 Subd. 2 (d-e; 1-4) Contract information (re-issued) Level 1, widespread scope, scope/level letter C · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to execute a written contract with the required content for one of one resident (R1).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to execute a written contract with the required content for one of one resident (R1). This practice resulted in a level one violation (a violation that has no potential to cause more than a minimal impact on the resident and does not affect health or safety), and was issued at a widespread scope (when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has affected or has potential to affect a large portion or all of the [...]”

    Rule cited: “(d) The contract must include a description of the facility's complaint resolution process available to residents, including the name and contact information of the person representing the facility who is designated to handle and resolve complaints. [...]”

  • Tag 950: 144G.50 Subd. 3 Designation of representative (re-issued) Level 1, widespread scope, scope/level letter C · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to offer the opportunity to identify a designated representative, on a separate form, for one of one resident (R1).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to offer the opportunity to identify a designated representative, on a separate form, for one of one resident (R1). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) Before or at the time of execution of an assisted living contract, an assisted living facility must offer the resident the opportunity to identify a designated representative in writing in the contract and must provide the following verbatim notice on a [...]”

  • Tag 970: 144G.50 Subd. 5 Waivers of liability prohibited (re-issued) Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the assisted living contract did not include language waiving the facility's liability for health, safety, or personal property of a resident.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the assisted living contract did not include language waiving the facility's liability for health, safety, or personal property of a resident. This had the potential to affect all residents. [...]”

    Rule cited: “The contract must not include a waiver of facility liability for the health and safety or personal property of a resident. [...]”

  • Tag 1290: 144G.60 Subdivision 1 Background studies required (re-issued) scope/level letter G · fine: $3,000.00 assessed
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “No further actions required.”

    Rule cited: “(a) Employees, contractors, and regularly scheduled volunteers of the facility are subject to the background study required by section 144.057 and may be disqualified under chapter 245C. [...]”

  • Tag 1470: 144G.63 Subd. 2 Content of required orientation (re-issued) scope/level letter D
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “No further actions required.”

    Rule cited: “(a) The orientation must contain the following topics: (1) an overview of this chapter; (2) an introduction and review of the facility's policies and procedures related to the provision of assisted living services by the individual staff person; (3) handling [...]”

  • Tag 1500: 144G.63 Subd. 5 Required annual training (re-issued) Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure employees received at least eight (8) hours of training for each 12 months of employment for one of one employee (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-D).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure employees received at least eight (8) hours of training for each 12 months of employment for one of one employee (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-D). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) All staff that perform direct services must complete at least eight hours of annual training for each 12 months of employment. [...]”

  • Tag 1540: 144G.64 (a) TRAINING IN DEMENTIA CARE REQUIRED (re-issued) scope/level letter D
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “No further actions required.”

    Rule cited: “(3) for assisted living facilities with dementia care, direct-care employees must have completed at least eight hours of initial training on topics specified under paragraph (b) within 80 working hours of the employment start date. [...]”

  • Tag 1610: 144G.70 Subd. 2 (a-b) Initial reviews, assessments, and monitoring (re-issued) Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure a registered nurse (RN) conducted a comprehensive nursing assessment for one of one resident (R4).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure a registered nurse (RN) conducted a comprehensive nursing assessment for one of one resident (R4). This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety) and was issued at a widespread scope (when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has affected or has the potential to affect a large [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) Residents who are not receiving any assisted living services shall not be required to undergo an initial nursing assessment. [...]”

  • Tag 1620: 144G.70 Subd. 2 (c-e) Initial reviews, assessments, and monitoring (re-issued) scope/level letter D
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “No further actions required.”

    Rule cited: “(c) Resident reassessment and monitoring must be conducted no more than 14 calendar days after initiation of services. [...]”

  • Tag 1650: 144G.70 Subd. 4 (f) Service plan, implementation and revisions to (re-issued) Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the service plan included the required content for one of one resident (R1).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the service plan included the required content for one of one resident (R1). This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death), and was issued at a widespread scope (when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has [...]”

    Rule cited: “(f) The service plan must include: (1) a description of the services to be provided, the fees for services, and the frequency of each service, according to the resident's current assessment and resident preferences; (2) the identification of staff or [...]”

  • Tag 1730: 144G.71 Subd. 5 Individualized medication management plan (re-issued) Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to maintain an accurate individualized medication management record for each resident to include all required content for one of one resident (R4).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to maintain an accurate individualized medication management record for each resident to include all required content for one of one resident (R4). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) For each resident receiving medication management services, the assisted living facility must prepare and include in the service plan a written statement of the medication management services that will be provided to the resident. [...]”

  • Tag 1890: 144G.71 Subd. 20 Prescription drugs (re-issued) scope/level letter D
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “No further actions required.”

    Rule cited: “A prescription drug, prior to being set up for immediate or later administration, must be kept in the original container in which it was dispensed by the pharmacy bearing the original prescription label with legible information including the expiration or [...]”

  • Tag 1910: 144G.71 Subd. 22 Disposition of medications (re-issued) scope/level letter D
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “No further actions required.”

    Rule cited: “(a) Any current medications being managed by the assisted living facility must be provided to the resident when the resident's service plan ends or medication management services are no longer part of the service plan. [...]”

  • Tag 1940: 144G.72 Subd. 3 Individualized treatment or therapy managemen (re-issued) scope/level letter D
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “No further actions required.”

    Rule cited: “For each resident receiving management of ordered or prescribed treatments or therapy services, the assisted living facility must prepare and include in the service plan a written statement of the treatment or therapy services that will be provided to the [...]”

Survey completed October 4, 2024: 20 correction orders

  • Tag 470: 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Minimum requirements Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Two (2) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure that one or more persons were available 24 hours per day, seven days per week, who were responsible for responding to the requests of residents for assistance with health or safety needs.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure that one or more persons were available 24 hours per day, seven days per week, who were responsible for responding to the requests of residents for assistance with health or safety needs. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(11) develop and implement a staffing plan for determining its staffing level that: (i) includes an evaluation, to be conducted at least twice a year, of the appropriateness of staffing levels in the facility; (ii) ensures sufficient staffing at all times to [...]”

  • Tag 480: 144G.41 Subd 1 (13) (i) (B) Minimum requirements Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Please refer to the FBEIR for any compliance dates
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code. This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety) and was issued at a widespread scope (when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has affected or has the potential to affect a large portion or all the [...]”

    Rule cited: “(13) offer to provide or make available at least the following services to residents: (B) food must be prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code, Minnesota Rules, chapter 4626; and”

  • Tag 660: 144G.42 Subd. 9 Tuberculosis prevention and control Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to maintain a tuberculosis (TB) prevention and control program, based on the most current guidelines issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), which included a completed health history and symptom screening and a two-step tuberculin skin test (TST) or other evidence of TB screening such as a blood test for one of one employee (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-C).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to maintain a tuberculosis (TB) prevention and control program, based on the most current guidelines issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), which included a completed health history and symptom screening and a two-step tuberculin skin test (TST) or other evidence of TB screening such as a blood test for one of one employee (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-C). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) The facility must establish and maintain a comprehensive tuberculosis infection control program according to the most current tuberculosis infection control guidelines issued by the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Division [...]”

  • Tag 680: 144G.42 Subd. 10 Disaster planning and emergency preparedness Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to maintain a written emergency preparedness plan (EPP) with all the required content as defined in Appendix Z. This had the potential to affect all residents, staff, and visitors.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to maintain a written emergency preparedness plan (EPP) with all the required content as defined in Appendix Z. This had the potential to affect all residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) The facility must meet the following requirements: (1) have a written emergency disaster plan that contains a plan for evacuation, addresses elements of sheltering in place, identifies temporary relocation sites, and details staff assignments in the event [...]”

  • Tag 780: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (1) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to maintain required smoke alarms.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to maintain required smoke alarms. This had the potential to directly affect all residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) Each assisted living facility must comply with the State Fire Code in Minnesota Rules, chapter 7511, and: (1) for dwellings or sleeping units, as defined in the State Fire Code: (i) provide smoke alarms in each room used for sleeping purposes; (ii) [...]”

Show all 20
  • Tag 810: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (b)-(f) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop the fire safety and evacuation plan with required content and failed to provide the required training to employees and residents.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to develop the fire safety and evacuation plan with required content and failed to provide the required training to employees and residents. This had the potential to directly affect all residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(b) Each assisted living facility shall develop and maintain fire safety and evacuation plans. [...]”

  • Tag 930: 144G.50 Subd. 2 (d-e; 1-4) Contract information Level 1, widespread scope, scope/level letter C · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to execute a written contract with the required content for one of one resident (R1).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to execute a written contract with the required content for one of one resident (R1). This practice resulted in a level one violation (a violation that has no potential to cause more than a minimal impact on the resident and does not affect health or safety), and was issued at a widespread scope (when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has affected or has potential to affect a large portion or all of the [...]”

    Rule cited: “(d) The contract must include a description of the facility's complaint resolution process available to residents, including the name and contact information of the person representing the facility who is designated to handle and resolve complaints. [...]”

  • Tag 950: 144G.50 Subd. 3 Designation of representative Level 1, widespread scope, scope/level letter C · correction period: Twenty-One
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to offer the opportunity to identify a designated representative, on a separate form, for one of one resident (R1).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to offer the opportunity to identify a designated representative, on a separate form, for one of one resident (R1). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) Before or at the time of execution of an assisted living contract, an assisted living facility must offer the resident the opportunity to identify a designated representative in writing in the contract and must provide the following verbatim notice on a [...]”

  • Tag 970: 144G.50 Subd. 5 Waivers of liability prohibited Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter C · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the assisted living contract did not include language waiving the facility's liability for health, safety, or personal property of a resident.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the assisted living contract did not include language waiving the facility's liability for health, safety, or personal property of a resident. This had the potential to affect all residents. [...]”

    Rule cited: “The contract must not include a waiver of facility liability for the health and safety or personal property of a resident. [...]”

  • Tag 1290: 144G.60 Subdivision 1 Background studies required Level 3, isolated scope, scope/level letter G · fine: $3,000.00 assessed
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure a

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview, observation, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure a background study (BGS) was submitted and a clearance received in affiliation with the assisted living licensee's current health facility identification (HFID) for one of one employee unlicensed personnel (ULP)-C. This had the potential to affect all residents living within the facility. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) Employees, contractors, and regularly scheduled volunteers of the facility are subject to the background study required by section 144.057 and may be disqualified under chapter 245C. [...]”

  • Tag 1470: 144G.63 Subd. 2 Content of required orientation Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure employees received orientation to include all required content for one of one employee (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-C).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure employees received orientation to include all required content for one of one employee (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-C). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) The orientation must contain the following topics: (1) an overview of this chapter; (2) an introduction and review of the facility's policies and procedures related to the provision of assisted living services by the individual staff person; (3) handling [...]”

  • Tag 1500: 144G.63 Subd. 5 Required annual training Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure employees received at least eight (8) hours of training for each 12 months of employment for one of one employee (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-C).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure employees received at least eight (8) hours of training for each 12 months of employment for one of one employee (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-C). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) All staff that perform direct services must complete at least eight hours of annual training for each 12 months of employment. [...]”

  • Tag 1540: 144G.64 (a) TRAINING IN DEMENTIA CARE REQUIRED Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure employees completed the required amount of dementia care training in the required time frame, one of three employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-E).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure employees completed the required amount of dementia care training in the required time frame, one of three employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-E). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(3) for assisted living facilities with dementia care, direct-care employees must have completed at least eight hours of initial training on topics specified under paragraph (b) within 80 working hours of the employment start date. [...]”

  • Tag 1610: 144G.70 Subd. 2 (a-b) Initial reviews, assessments, and monitoring Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure a registered nurse (RN) conducted a comprehensive nursing assessment for one of one resident (R1).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure a registered nurse (RN) conducted a comprehensive nursing assessment for one of one resident (R1). This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety) and was issued at a widespread scope (when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has affected or has the potential to affect a large [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) Residents who are not receiving any assisted living services shall not be required to undergo an initial nursing assessment. [...]”

  • Tag 1620: 144G.70 Subd. 2 (c-e) Initial reviews, assessments, and monitoring Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) completed a comprehensive reassessment not to exceed 90 calendar days from the last assessment, for one of one resident (R1).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) completed a comprehensive reassessment not to exceed 90 calendar days from the last assessment, for one of one resident (R1). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(c) Resident reassessment and monitoring must be conducted no more than 14 calendar days after initiation of services. [...]”

  • Tag 1650: 144G.70 Subd. 4 (f) Service plan, implementation and revisions to Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the service plan included the required content for one of one resident (R1).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the service plan included the required content for one of one resident (R1). This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death), and was issued at a widespread scope (when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure [...]”

    Rule cited: “(f) The service plan must include: (1) a description of the services to be provided, the fees for services, and the frequency of each service, according to the resident's current assessment and resident preferences; (2) the identification of staff or [...]”

  • Tag 1730: 144G.71 Subd. 5 Individualized medication management plan Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to maintain an accurate individualized medication management record for each resident to include all required content for one of one residents (R1).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to maintain an accurate individualized medication management record for each resident to include all required content for one of one residents (R1). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) For each resident receiving medication management services, the assisted living facility must prepare and include in the service plan a written statement of the medication management services that will be provided to the resident. [...]”

  • Tag 1890: 144G.71 Subd. 20 Prescription drugs Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7)
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to date time sensitive medications with an open date for one of one resident (R3).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to date time sensitive medications with an open date for one of one resident (R3). This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death), and was issued at an isolated scope (when one or a limited number of residents are affected or one [...]”

    Rule cited: “A prescription drug, prior to being set up for immediate or later administration, must be kept in the original container in which it was dispensed by the pharmacy bearing the original prescription label with legible information including the expiration or [...]”

  • Tag 1910: 144G.71 Subd. 22 Disposition of medications Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to maintain documentation in the resident's record regarding the disposition of medication to include quantity and names of staff and other individuals involved in the disposition of medications for one of one discharged resident (R1).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to maintain documentation in the resident's record regarding the disposition of medication to include quantity and names of staff and other individuals involved in the disposition of medications for one of one discharged resident (R1). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) Any current medications being managed by the assisted living facility must be provided to the resident when the resident's service plan ends or medication management services are no longer part of the service plan. [...]”

  • Tag 1940: 144G.72 Subd. 3 Individualized treatment or therapy managemen Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop and implement a current treatment or therapy management plan to include all required content for one of one resident1 (R1) who received treatments.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to develop and implement a current treatment or therapy management plan to include all required content for one of one resident1 (R1) who received treatments. [...]”

    Rule cited: “For each resident receiving management of ordered or prescribed treatments or therapy services, the assisted living facility must prepare and include in the service plan a written statement of the treatment or therapy services that will be provided to the [...]”

From MDH’s letter: the letter says the facility is in substantial compliance.

Fines assessed by MDH

  • Tag 1290 (144g.60 Subdivision 1 - Background Studies Required): $3,000.00

Total fines assessed, as printed in the letter: $500.00.

Total fines assessed, as printed in the letter: $2,500.00.

Total fines assessed, as printed in the letter: $3,000.00.

What the levels and scopes mean (MDH’s words)

Level 1: “a violation that has no potential to cause more than a minimal impact on the resident and does not affect health or safety”

Level 2: “a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death”

Level 3: “a violation that harmed a resident's health or safety, not including serious injury, impairment, or death, or a violation that has the potential to lead to serious injury, impairment, or death”

Isolated scope: “when one or a limited number of residents are affected or one or a limited number of staff are involved, or the situation has occurred only occasionally”

Pattern scope: “when more than a limited number of residents are affected, more than a limited number of staff are involved, or the situation has occurred repeatedly; but is not found to be pervasive”

Widespread scope: “when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has affected or has the potential to affect a large portion or all of the residents”

Summaries are ours and are marked “Summary”; quoted text is MDH’s own, shortened where marked [...]. Read the full reports at the links above or search every report on MDH’s site.

What these terms mean

MDH: “An evaluation is a process regulated by the division to ensure licensees comply with the laws, rules, and certifications for the type of care and services authorized under their license/certification.”

“An investigation may occur when the division is notified that care and services are not being provided by licensees as required by law. This may include allegations of abuse, neglect, or financial misuse.”

For maltreatment, Minnesota law defines substantiated as “a preponderance of the evidence shows that an act that meets the definition of maltreatment occurred” and inconclusive as “less than a preponderance of evidence to show that maltreatment did or did not occur” (Minn. Stat. 626.5572).

Correction orders, as MDH explains on each state form: “Tag numbers have been assigned to Minnesota State Statutes for Assisted Living Facilities.” “The letter in the left column is used for tracking purposes and reflects the scope and level issued pursuant to 144G.31 subd. 1, 2, and 3.” MDH adds that there is no requirement to submit a plan of correction for violations of Minnesota state statutes.

MDH keeps investigation results for seven years when allegations are substantiated, four years when inconclusive, and three years when unsubstantiated, so the counts cover different periods. This community is licensed for 3 residents; larger communities are evaluated and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division, data as of September 28, 2026. Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.

License and ownershipActive license, licensee MIA'S HOUSE ST. CLOUD
License type
Assisted Living Facility
License number
422737
License status
Active
Current license dated
2025-11-01
Licensed capacity
3
Licensee
MIA'S HOUSE ST. CLOUD
Administrator/Authorized Agent
Romanda Gaye-Schaeppi

Source: Minnesota state licensing records (agency listing), retrieved 2026-09-09. Licensing status is a matter of public record; it is not a quality rating.

Administrator/Authorized Agent name from the Minnesota licensing record, as of Sep 9, 2026.

Paying with Medicaid and other programsHow Medicaid pays for care in Minnesota, and other programs

How Medicaid pays for care in Minnesota

  • Elderly Waiver (EW), customized living services. Minnesota's Elderly Waiver, part of Medical Assistance (Minnesota Medicaid), can pay for "customized living" services, and a provider of those services must hold an assisted living license (or meet certain exceptions). You must qualify for Medical Assistance and need a nursing-home level of care. (state page)

Ask the community whether it accepts Medicaid.

Location and nearby careNearest hospital 3.6 mi, nursing home 0.7 mi, pharmacy 2.1 mi
Nearest hospital with an emergency room
Centracare - St. Cloud Hospital, Saint Cloud. 3.6 miles away, straight line. CMS overall hospital rating: 4 of 5 stars.
Nearest Medicare nursing home
St Benedicts Care Center, Saint Cloud. 0.7 miles away, straight line.
Nearest home health agency office
Centracare Home Health, Waite Park. 4.4 miles away, straight line. Agencies travel to clients, so ask which ones serve this address.
Nearest pharmacy
Southside Pharmacy. 2.1 miles away, straight line. From OpenStreetMap, which does not list every pharmacy, so one may be closer.
Area
USDA classes ZIP code 56304 as metropolitan (metropolitan core).
Dialysis within 15 miles
Fresenius Kidney Care St. Cloud, Saint Cloud, 4.1 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 3 of 5 stars)
Hospice
9 Medicare hospices tell CMS they serve ZIP code 56304.
St Croix Hospice, office in St. Cloud, 1.9 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 4 of 5 stars)
Centracare Hospice, office in Waite Park, 4.4 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 4 of 5 stars)
Moments Hospice, office in Saint Cloud, 6.3 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 3 of 5 stars)
Nearest geriatric medicine practice
Allina Health System, Annandale. 18.9 miles away, straight line. 2 geriatric medicine doctors listed there.

Distances are straight lines from the community, not driving distance. Hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors come from CMS provider data (CMS, hospital list updated Jul 22, 2026). Star ratings are CMS’s own.

Emergency and natural hazard riskFEMA overall risk relatively moderate; outside FEMA's high-risk flood areas

Public hazard maps for this location. Ask the community about its emergency plan, its generator and where residents would go in an evacuation.

Flood zone
Outside the high and moderate risk flood areas on FEMA's flood map (Zone X, minimal flood hazard, or not studied). (FEMA flood map)
FEMA National Risk Index
Overall: relatively moderate. By hazard: inland flooding relatively moderate, wildfire relatively low, tornado relatively high, heat wave relatively moderate, earthquake very low. These are FEMA’s ratings for the census tract, compared with tracts nationwide. (FEMA, December 2025)

A flood zone describes the map at this point, not the building's elevation. In an emergency, follow the local emergency management agency.

Questions to ask on a tour10 questions picked for this community from its record

Picked for this community from its record. Ask them in person and write down the answers.

  1. The current license dates from 2025. Has the owner or operator changed recently?
  2. What does the base rate include, and when did rates last go up?
  3. Who is here at night? Are they awake, or asleep and on call?
  4. Who covers when the owner is sick, on vacation, or away for the day? Can we meet them?
  5. Is it one flat rate, or does it rise with care needs?
  6. Can you help someone who needs two people to move, or a mechanical lift?
  7. How many caregivers are on duty during the day and at night?
  8. What happens if care needs increase? When would someone need to move?
  9. What fees are charged at move-in?
  10. How do you tell families about falls, illness or changes?
What we checked11 public sources we searched, with dates

Every public source we searched for this community. “Nothing on record” means we found no record that matched it. A record can be missed when a name or address differs.

SourceData as ofWhat we found
Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division inspection recordsSep 28, 2026See above
U.S. Department of Labor wage and hour casesOct 15, 2026Nothing on record
OSHA workplace safety inspections since 2016Oct 15, 2026Nothing on record
FEMA flood mapSee above
USDA wildfire riskApr 15, 2026Not shown: FEMA rates wildfire risk here relatively low
FEMA National Risk IndexSee above
CMS hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors; OpenStreetMap pharmaciesSee above
HUD Multifamily Properties - AssistedJul 6, 2026Nothing on record
State Veterans Homes (NASVH directory)Sep 20, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Hospice - General InformationAug 19, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Home Health Care AgenciesMay 27, 2026Nothing on record
Common questionsAnswers to 4 questions families ask
What type of care does Mia's House St Cloud provide?

Mia's House St Cloud is licensed by the state of Minnesota for assisted living in St. Cloud, Minnesota. Its licensed capacity is 3 residents.

Does Lilisity rate Mia's House St Cloud?

No. We publish state licensing details for Mia's House St Cloud but no score, rating, or ranking. Only communities on the Top Communities list or with a Senior Living Alliance Excellence Award, both based on phone-verified resident and family interviews, are ranked.

How much does Mia's House St Cloud cost?

Assisted Living in Minnesota typically starts at $2,200 to $4,800 a month. Based on 74 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price. Mia's House St Cloud does not publish its prices.

How do I contact Mia's House St Cloud?

Visit Mia's House St Cloud at 2607 15th Avenue Se, St. Cloud, MN 56304.

Choosing a small care homeOur care guide: what to look for, what it costs, how families pay, and more questions to ask (PDF)

Report a wrong fact

How Lilisity works. The only scores or rankings Lilisity publishes are the Top Communities list and the Excellence Awards, both built from phone-verified resident and family interviews. Communities can pay Lilisity a flat monthly fee to manage their own listing: photos, prices, contact details, and receiving the inquiries families choose to send them. The fee is the same no matter how many families contact them or move in. Senior Living Alliance, which runs Lilisity, offers the same listing to its member communities as part of their membership; members pay SLA for its resident and family interview program. No community pays Lilisity per inquiry, per referral or per move-in. Payment never changes a testimonial, a rating, or the order of search results. The "Nearby Senior Living Alliance communities" box shows member communities only. How we verify testimonials · How we are paid