Assisted Living and Memory Care
Lindstrom Senior Living
30455 Lehigh Avenue, Lindstrom, MN 55045 · Map
Licensed for 102 residents · LINDSTROM SENIOR LIVING
Lindstrom Senior Living is a state-licensed assisted living, memory care community in Lindstrom, Minnesota. It is licensed for 102 residents. Lilisity publishes no score or ranking for this community; the details below come from the state licensing record.
Prices
This community does not publish its prices.
Area costs
Care and services
From the community’s website
What Lindstrom Senior Living says about itself, quoted from its own site. We have not checked these claims against licensing records. Ask about each one on a tour.
- Nurse on site: 24 hours a day.
24-Hour On-Site Nursing Staff
(page, checked Oct 15, 2026) - Provides transportation.
Residents have access to complimentary transportation to these destinations, ensuring they stay engaged in all that the community has to offer.
(page, checked Oct 15, 2026) - 3 meals a day.
Three Meals Per Day in the Memory Care Dining Room
(page, checked Oct 15, 2026) - Apartment types named: studio, one-bedroom.
With four apartment styles that range from efficiency studios to one-bedrooms, our specially designed Memory Care apartments provide a safe, comfortable retreat for your loved one when they are not participating in the wide variety of activities and programming that take place in our community spaces.
(page, checked Oct 15, 2026)
Lilisity’s independent report
What the public record shows
Gathered by Lilisity from state and federal sources. Communities can’t edit this part of the page.
License
Active, 102 residents
Assisted Living Facility Dementia Care 422960, current license dated Dec 2, 2025. Licensee LINDSTROM SENIOR LIVING.
Nearest emergency room
8.3 miles
Fairview Lakes Health Services, rated 3 of 5 stars by CMS.
Side by side with nearby communities
The 4 nearest communities that offer assisted living, by straight-line distance. Prices are starting prices each community publishes; we never show estimates.
| Community | Distance | Licensed capacity | Published starting price | License | Inspection citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lindstrom Senior Living this community | 102 | Not published | Active | 1 substantiated | |
| Just Like Home Senior Care | 1.9 mi | 5 | Not published | Active | 0 substantiated |
| Parmly on the Lake (Assisted Living and Memory Care) | 2.6 mi | 55 | Not published | Active | 0 substantiated |
| Windy Acres Long Term Care | 7.8 mi | 17 | Not published | Active | 1 substantiated |
| Meadows on Fairview Al | 8.2 mi | 75 | Not published | Active | 0 substantiated |
State inspection record1 substantiated
- Last evaluation
- August 6, 2025
- Evaluations on record
- 2
- Investigations substantiated
- 1 kept 7 years
- Inconclusive
- 0 kept 4 years
- Unsubstantiated
- 3 kept 3 years
Most recent evaluation (August 6, 2025, state report GMGY11)
MDH: “On August 4, 2025, through August 6, 2025, the Minnesota Department of Health conducted a full survey at the above provider and the following correction orders are issued.”
Survey completed August 6, 2025: 6 correction orders
- Tag 630: 144G.42 Subd. 6 (b) Compliance with requirements for reporting ma Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure an individual abuse prevention plan (IAPP) was developed or included a review/assessment of the person's susceptibility to abuse by another individual, including other vulnerable adults; the person's risk of abusing other vulnerable adults and statements of the specific measures to be taken to minimize the risk of abuse for one of one resident (R2).
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure an individual abuse prevention plan (IAPP) was developed or included a review/assessment of the person's susceptibility to abuse by another individual, including other vulnerable adults; the person's risk of abusing other vulnerable adults and statements of the specific measures to be taken to minimize the risk of abuse for one of one resident (R2). [...]”
Rule cited: “(b) The facility must develop and implement an individual abuse prevention plan for each vulnerable adult. [...]”
- Tag 775: 144G.45 Subd. 2. (a) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days · fine: $500.00 assessed
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to comply with the requirements of the Minnesota State Fire Code.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to comply with the requirements of the Minnesota State Fire Code. This had the potential to directly affect all residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”
Rule cited: “Each assisted living facility must comply with the State Fire Code in Minnesota Rules, chapter 7511, and:”
- Tag 810: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (b-f) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop the fire safety and evacuation plan with the required content and provide the required training and drills.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to develop the fire safety and evacuation plan with the required content and provide the required training and drills. This had the potential to directly affect all residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”
Rule cited: “(b) Each assisted living facility shall develop and maintain fire safety and evacuation plans. [...]”
- Tag 1290: 144G.60 Subdivision 1 Background studies required Level 3, widespread scope, scope/level letter I · correction period: IMMEDIATE · fine: $1,000.00 assessed
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure a background study was
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure a background study was submitted and completed for the current health facility identification (HFID) number for one of one employee (unlicensed personnel (ULP-D) on the facility provided employee roster. [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) Employees, contractors, and regularly scheduled volunteers of the facility are subject to the background study required by section 144.057 and may be disqualified under chapter 245C. [...]”
- Tag 1820: 144G.71 Subd. 13 Prescriptions Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to maintain current medication orders for one of three residents (R3).
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to maintain current medication orders for one of three residents (R3). This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death), and was issued at an isolated scope (when one or a limited number of residents are affected or one or a limited number of [...]”
Rule cited: “There must be a current written or electronically recorded prescription as defined in section 151.01, subdivision 16a, for all prescribed medications that the assisted living facility is managing for the resident.”
- Tag 2310: 144G.91 Subd. 4 (a) Appropriate care and services Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: two (2) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the care and services were provided according to acceptable
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the care and services were provided according to acceptable health care and medical, or nursing standards for one of one resident (R3) with an assistive device (consumer side rail). [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) Residents have the right to care and assisted living services that are appropriate based on the resident's needs and according to an up-to-date service plan subject to accepted health care standards.”
From MDH’s letter: the letter says the facility is in substantial compliance.
Food and beverage inspection (included in this report): No orders were issued for this inspection report.
Fines assessed by MDH
- Tag 775 (144g.45 Subd. 2. (a) - Fire Protection And Physical Environment): $500.00
- Tag 1290 (144g.60 Subdivision 1 - Background Studies Required): $1,000.00
Total fines assessed, as printed in the letter: $1,500.00.
Earlier evaluations (1)
- July 8, 2022: report NYHZ11 · 15 correction orders
Details
Survey completed July 7, 2022: 15 correction orders
- Tag 480: 144G.41 Subd 1 (13) (i) (B) Minimum requirements Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code. This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety) and was issued at a widespread scope (when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has affected or has the potential to affect a large portion or all the [...]”
Rule cited: “(13) offer to provide or make available at least the following services to residents: (i) at least three nutritious meals daily with snacks available seven days per week, according to the recommended dietary allowances in the United States Department of [...]”
- Tag 495: 144G.41 Subd. 1 (14) Minimum Requirements Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure a registered nurse was available 24 hours a day, seven days a week to provide consultation to staff performing delegated nursing tasks and services.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and document review, the licensee failed to ensure a registered nurse was available 24 hours a day, seven days a week to provide consultation to staff performing delegated nursing tasks and services. This had the potential to affect all eighteen (18) residents receiving assisted living services. [...]”
Rule cited: “(14) provide staff access to an on-call registered nurse 24 hours per day, seven days per week.”
- Tag 510: 144G.41 Subd. 3 Infection control program Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) Days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure staff completed proper infection control technique for one of one unlicensed personnel (ULP)-C observed during R7's blood glucose check and medication administration.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure staff completed proper infection control technique for one of one unlicensed personnel (ULP)-C observed during R7's blood glucose check and medication administration. [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) All assisted living facilities must establish and maintain an infection control program that complies with accepted health care, medical, and nursing standards for infection control. [...]”
- Tag 580: 144G.42 Subd. 2 Quality management Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter C · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to engage in quality management activity appropriate to the size of the facility, relevant to the type of services provided, and failed to maintain documentation on quality management activities.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to engage in quality management activity appropriate to the size of the facility, relevant to the type of services provided, and failed to maintain documentation on quality management activities. This had the potential to affect all eighteen (18) residents receiving assisted living services. [...]”
Rule cited: “The facility shall engage in quality management appropriate to the size of the facility and relevant to the type of services provided. [...]”
- Tag 620: 144G.42 Subd. 6 (a) Compliance with requirements for reporting ma Level 2, pattern scope, scope/level letter E · correction period: Seven (7) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the facility failed to report a physical injury of unknown origin to the Minnesota Adult Abuse Reporting Center (MARRC) within 24 hours of staff becoming aware of the incident for two of two residents (R1, R4).
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report a physical injury of unknown origin to the Minnesota Adult Abuse Reporting Center (MARRC) within 24 hours of staff becoming aware of the incident for two of two residents (R1, R4). [...]”
Rule cited: “144G.42 Subd. 6. Compliance with requirements for reporting maltreatment of vulnerable adults; abuse prevention plan. (a) The assisted living facility must comply with the requirements for the reporting of maltreatment of vulnerable adults in section 626.557. [...]”
Show all 15
- Tag 680: 144G.42 Subd. 10 Disaster planning and emergency preparedness Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the facility emergency preparedness (EP) plan contained all the required components.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the facility emergency preparedness (EP) plan contained all the required components. This had the potential to affect all eighteen (18) residents receiving assisted living services, staff, and visitors. [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) The facility must meet the following requirements: (1) have a written emergency disaster plan that contains a plan for evacuation, addresses elements of sheltering in place, identifies temporary relocation sites, and details staff assignments in the event [...]”
- Tag 800: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (4) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to maintain the physical environment of the facility in a continuous state of good repair and operation.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to maintain the physical environment of the facility in a continuous state of good repair and operation. This has the potential to directly affect the health, safety, and well-being of all residents and staff. [...]”
Rule cited: “(4) keep the physical environment, including walls, floors, ceiling, all furnishings, grounds, systems, and equipment in a continuous state of good repair and operation with regard to the health, safety, comfort, and well-being of the residents in accordance [...]”
- Tag 810: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (b)-(f) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Fourteen (14) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide all required content on the fire safety and evacuation plan, and the minimum number of evacuation drills.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, record review, and interview, the licensee failed to provide all required content on the fire safety and evacuation plan, and the minimum number of evacuation drills. This has the potential to directly affect the safety all residents receiving care, staff, and visitors. [...]”
Rule cited: “(b) Each assisted living facility shall develop and maintain fire safety and evacuation plans. [...]”
- Tag 900: 144G.50 Subdivision 1 Contract required Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty One
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure a resident or representative signed a written contract prior to
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure a resident or representative signed a written contract prior to initiation of services for one of four (R8) resident contracts reviewed. [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) An assisted living facility may not offer or provide housing or assisted living services to any individual unless it has executed a written contract with the resident. [...]”
- Tag 970: 144.50 Subd. 5 Waivers of liability prohibited Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the assisted living contract did not include language waiving the facility's liability for health, safety, or personal property of a resident.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the assisted living contract did not include language waiving the facility's liability for health, safety, or personal property of a resident. This had the potential to affect all residents. [...]”
Rule cited: “The contract must not include a waiver of facility liability for the health and safety or personal property of a resident. [...]”
- Tag 1420: 144G.62 Subd. 2 Delegation of assisted living services Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty One (21) Days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure two of two unlicensed personnel (ULP) (ULP-G, ULP-H) were trained and deemed competent on the proper use R7's mechanical sit-to-stand lift and ankle-foot orthosis (AFO) brace prior completing these delegated tasks.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure two of two unlicensed personnel (ULP) (ULP-G, ULP-H) were trained and deemed competent on the proper use R7's mechanical sit-to-stand lift and ankle-foot orthosis (AFO) brace prior completing these delegated tasks. [...]”
Rule cited: “(b) When the registered nurse or licensed health professional delegates tasks to unlicensed personnel, that person must ensure that prior to the delegation the unlicensed personnel is trained in the proper methods to perform the tasks or procedures for each [...]”
- Tag 1440: 144G.62 Subd. 4 Supervision of staff providing delegated nurs Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty One (21) Days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to complete 30-day competency evaluations for two of two unlicensed personnel (ULP) (ULP-G, ULP-H) with records reviewed.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to complete 30-day competency evaluations for two of two unlicensed personnel (ULP) (ULP-G, ULP-H) with records reviewed. [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) Staff who perform delegated nursing or therapy tasks must be supervised by an appropriate licensed health professional or a registered nurse according to the assisted living facility's policy where the services are being provided to verify that the work [...]”
- Tag 1700: 144G.71 Subd. 2 Provision of medication management services Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN)-A, conducted an individualized assessment to determine what Assisted Living services would be provided, and how the services would be provided for one of
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview, observation, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN)-A, conducted an individualized assessment to determine what Assisted Living services would be provided, and how the services would be provided for one of four residents (R4) with records reviewed. [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) For each resident who requests medication management services, the facility shall, prior to providing medication management services, have a registered nurse, licensed health professional, or authorized prescriber under section 151.37 conduct an [...]”
- Tag 2040: 144G.81 Subdivision 1 Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Fourteen (14) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide a complete hazard vulnerability or safety risk assessment plan to identify hazard vulnerabilities and mitigations on and around the property to protect the residents from potential harm.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, document review, and interview, the licensee failed to provide a complete hazard vulnerability or safety risk assessment plan to identify hazard vulnerabilities and mitigations on and around the property to protect the residents from potential harm. This has the potential to directly affect all memory care residents receiving assisted living services. [...]”
Rule cited: “An assisted living facility with dementia care that has a secured dementia care unit must meet the requirements of section 144G.45 and the following additional requirements: (1) a hazard vulnerability assessment or safety risk must be performed on and around [...]”
- Tag 2170: 144G.84 SERVICES FOR RESIDENTS WITH DEMENTIA Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty One (21) Days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to evaluate and develop a written, individualized activity plan addressing the six components for one of one (R8) residents reviewed with Alzheimer's disease or other dementia.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to evaluate and develop a written, individualized activity plan addressing the six components for one of one (R8) residents reviewed with Alzheimer's disease or other dementia. This affected all residents receiving care under the dementia care license. [...]”
Rule cited: “(b) Each resident must be evaluated for activities according to the licensing rules of the facility. [...]”
From MDH’s letter: MDH granted the assisted living license; no immediate fines.
- Tag 480: 144G.41 Subd 1 (13) (i) (B) Minimum requirements Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Substantiated investigations (state reports)
- August 19, 2024 · report HL378163681M · MDH finding: Substantiated, facility responsibility
Details
Allegation, as written: “The facility neglected the resident when the facility failed to follow the resident's plan of care and did not change the resident's wound dressing daily.”
“The Minnesota Department of Health determined neglect was substantiated.”
“The facility was responsible for the maltreatment.”
Summary: MDH looked into an allegation and found: neglect substantiated (facility responsibility).
MDH’s conclusion, as written: “The Minnesota Department of Health determined neglect was substantiated. The facility was responsible for the maltreatment. Although the facility staff changed the resident's foot dressing according to the provider order, facility staff failed to notify the nurse of the resident's change in skin condition for an unknown amount of time delaying treatment of the ulcers. The resident developed open ulcers (an open sore or wound that developed on the skin) on the right second and third toes and required a partial right foot amputation.”
Action taken by facility: “Once the facility identified the resident's wound, the primary care provider evaluated the resident. The facility started a process for monitoring resident's skin and created a skin assessment form. The staff were educated on completing the resident's skin checks on bath days.”
Action taken by MDH: “The responsible party will be notified of their right to appeal the maltreatment finding. The facility was found to be in noncompliance.”
Survey completed July 23, 2024: 1 correction order
- Tag 2360: 144G.91 Subd. 8 Freedom from maltreatment
Details
Summary: MDH found the facility failed to ensure one of two residents reviewed (R2) was free from maltreatment.
MDH’s finding, as written: “The facility failed to ensure one of two residents reviewed (R2) was free from maltreatment. Findings include: The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) issued a determination maltreatment occurred, and the facility was responsible for the maltreatment, in connection with incidents which occurred at the facility. Please refer to the public maltreatment report for details.”
Rule cited: “Residents have the right to be free from physical, sexual, and emotional abuse; neglect; financial exploitation; and all forms of maltreatment covered under the Vulnerable Adults Act.”
- Tag 2360: 144G.91 Subd. 8 Freedom from maltreatment
Unsubstantiated investigations (3)
- December 9, 2024 · report HL378166404M · MDH finding: Not Substantiated
Details
Allegation, as written: “The facility neglected the resident when staff failed to administer the resident's pain medication according to the physician orders resulting in unrelieved pain.”
“The Minnesota Department of Health determined neglect was not substantiated.”
Summary: MDH looked into an allegation and found: neglect not substantiated.
MDH’s conclusion, as written: “The Minnesota Department of Health determined neglect was not substantiated. Although the facility ran out of Morphine (opioid narcotic) for the resident, the contracted hospice services was responsible for the supply of the resident's Morphine. Facility staff requested a refill of the resident's Morphine from hospice approximately 10 hours prior to running out of the medication, however, there was confusion between pharmacies leaving the resident without Morphine for approximately 11 to 12 hours. Hospice arranged for the resident to receive hydromorphone (opioid narcotic) approximately four hours after running out of the Morphine supply. During that time, the resident was calm, unresponsive, and displayed no signs of pain.”
Action taken by facility: “The facility staff contacted the hospice agency for the Morphine medication to be refilled.”
Action taken by MDH: “No further action taken at this time.”
Survey completed November 4, 2024: no correction orders issued.
- October 16, 2024 · report HL378167521C
Details
Survey completed October 10, 2024: no correction orders issued.
- August 19, 2024 · report HL378163802M · MDH finding: Not Substantiated
Details
Allegation, as written: “The facility neglected the resident when facility staff failed to follow the resident's plan of care. The resident fell and hit her head resulting in injuries.”
“The Minnesota Department of Health determined neglect was not substantiated.”
Summary: MDH looked into an allegation and found: neglect not substantiated.
MDH’s conclusion, as written: “The Minnesota Department of Health determined neglect was not substantiated. Facility staff followed the resident's care plan at the time of the resident's fall. The resident stood in the dining room without staff awareness and fell on the floor sustaining a cut to the resident's head.”
Action taken by facility: “After the resident fell, the resident was sent to the hospital. The facility then added an intervention to prevent falls that included a sensor pad to be placed in the resident's wheelchair, chair, recliner, and bed.”
Action taken by MDH: “No further action taken at this time.”
Survey completed July 23, 2024: 1 correction order
- Tag 2360: 144G.91 Subd. 8 Freedom from maltreatment
Details
Summary: MDH found the facility failed to ensure one of two residents reviewed (R2) was free from maltreatment.
MDH’s finding, as written: “The facility failed to ensure one of two residents reviewed (R2) was free from maltreatment. Findings include: The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) issued a determination maltreatment occurred, and the facility was responsible for the maltreatment, in connection with incidents which occurred at the facility. Please refer to the public maltreatment report for details.”
Rule cited: “Residents have the right to be free from physical, sexual, and emotional abuse; neglect; financial exploitation; and all forms of maltreatment covered under the Vulnerable Adults Act.”
- Tag 2360: 144G.91 Subd. 8 Freedom from maltreatment
What the levels and scopes mean (MDH’s words)
Level 2: “a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death”
Level 3: “a violation that harmed a resident's health or safety, not including serious injury, impairment, or death, or a violation that has the potential to lead to serious injury, impairment, or death”
Isolated scope: “when one or a limited number of residents are affected or one or a limited number of staff are involved, or the situation has occurred only occasionally”
Pattern scope: “when more than a limited number of residents are affected, more than a limited number of staff are involved, or the situation has occurred repeatedly; but is not found to be pervasive”
Widespread scope: “when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has affected or has the potential to affect a large portion or all of the residents”
Summaries are ours and are marked “Summary”; quoted text is MDH’s own, shortened where marked [...]. Read the full reports at the links above or search every report on MDH’s site.
What these terms mean
MDH: “An evaluation is a process regulated by the division to ensure licensees comply with the laws, rules, and certifications for the type of care and services authorized under their license/certification.”
“An investigation may occur when the division is notified that care and services are not being provided by licensees as required by law. This may include allegations of abuse, neglect, or financial misuse.”
For maltreatment, Minnesota law defines substantiated as “a preponderance of the evidence shows that an act that meets the definition of maltreatment occurred” and inconclusive as “less than a preponderance of evidence to show that maltreatment did or did not occur” (Minn. Stat. 626.5572).
Correction orders, as MDH explains on each state form: “Tag numbers have been assigned to Minnesota State Statutes for Assisted Living Facilities.” “The letter in the left column is used for tracking purposes and reflects the scope and level issued pursuant to 144G.31 subd. 1, 2, and 3.” MDH adds that there is no requirement to submit a plan of correction for violations of Minnesota state statutes.
MDH keeps investigation results for seven years when allegations are substantiated, four years when inconclusive, and three years when unsubstantiated, so the counts cover different periods. This community is licensed for 102 residents; larger communities are evaluated and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division, data as of September 28, 2026. Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.
License and ownershipActive license, licensee LINDSTROM SENIOR LIVING
- License type
- Assisted Living Facility Dementia Care
- License number
- 422960
- License status
- Active
- Current license dated
- 2025-12-02
- Licensed capacity
- 102
- Licensee
- LINDSTROM SENIOR LIVING
- County
- Chisago County
- Executive Director
- Ashley Carlson
Source: Minnesota state licensing records (agency listing), retrieved 2026-09-09. Licensing status is a matter of public record; it is not a quality rating.
Executive Director name from public records we reviewed, as of Oct 12, 2026.
Paying with Medicaid and other programsHow Medicaid pays for care in Minnesota, and other programs
How Medicaid pays for care in Minnesota
- Elderly Waiver (EW), customized living services. Minnesota's Elderly Waiver, part of Medical Assistance (Minnesota Medicaid), can pay for "customized living" services, and a provider of those services must hold an assisted living license (or meet certain exceptions). You must qualify for Medical Assistance and need a nursing-home level of care. (state page)
Ask the community whether it accepts Medicaid.
Staff pay and workplace safety1 federal wage case with violations found
Federal records about how the employer here treats its staff.
Federal wage and hour cases
The Department of Labor checks that staff are paid minimum wage and overtime as the law requires.
- Findings for Jun 5, 2022 to Jun 1, 2024. Violations found: Overtime. Back wages: $6,240 owed to 20 employees. Employer as DOL recorded it: Lindstrom Senior Living (Rose Hill Operations LLC). Case 1992340.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Wage and Hour Division enforcement data, loaded Oct 15, 2026. Concluded cases only. The dates are the period in which DOL found violations, not when the case opened or closed. Back wages are what the employer agreed to pay; penalties are what DOL assessed. DOL does not publish a page for each case, so search the dataset by case number.
Location and nearby careNearest hospital 8.3 mi, nursing home 2.6 mi, pharmacy 0.3 mi
- Nearest hospital with an emergency room
- Fairview Lakes Health Services, Wyoming. 8.3 miles away, straight line. CMS overall hospital rating: 3 of 5 stars.
- Nearest Medicare nursing home
- Parmly on the Lake LLC, Chisago City. 2.6 miles away, straight line.
- Nearest home health agency office
- Good Samaritan Society - Home Care, St Croix Falls. 11.2 miles away, straight line. Agencies travel to clients, so ask which ones serve this address.
- Nearest pharmacy
- Lindstrom Thrifty White Pharmacy. 0.3 miles away, straight line. From OpenStreetMap, which does not list every pharmacy, so one may be closer.
- Area
- USDA classes ZIP code 55045 as metropolitan (metropolitan high commuting).
- Dialysis within 15 miles
- Davita Wyoming Dialysis, Wyoming, 8.0 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 4 of 5 stars)
- Hospice
- 10 Medicare hospices tell CMS they serve ZIP code 55045.
Olive Grove Hospice LLC, office in Blaine, 20.9 miles away, straight line - Nearest geriatric medicine practice
- Group Health Inc, Coon Rapids. 26.3 miles away, straight line. 1 geriatric medicine doctor listed there.
Distances are straight lines from the community, not driving distance. Hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors come from CMS provider data (CMS, hospital list updated Jul 22, 2026). Star ratings are CMS’s own.
Emergency and natural hazard riskFEMA overall risk relatively low; outside FEMA's high-risk flood areas
Public hazard maps for this location. Ask the community about its emergency plan, its generator and where residents would go in an evacuation.
- Flood zone
- Outside the high and moderate risk flood areas on FEMA's flood map (Zone X, minimal flood hazard, or not studied). (FEMA flood map)
- FEMA National Risk Index
- Overall: relatively low. By hazard: inland flooding relatively low, wildfire relatively low, tornado relatively high, heat wave relatively low, earthquake very low. These are FEMA’s ratings for the census tract, compared with tracts nationwide. (FEMA, December 2025)
A flood zone describes the map at this point, not the building's elevation. In an emergency, follow the local emergency management agency.
Questions to ask on a tour10 questions picked for this community from its record
Picked for this community from its record. Ask them in person and write down the answers.
- The Department of Labor found wage violations here for a period ending June 2024. What changed in how staff are paid?
- The current license dates from 2025. Has the owner or operator changed recently?
- What does the base rate include, and when did rates last go up?
- How many caregivers work in memory care during the day, the evening and overnight, and for how many residents?
- What dementia training does each caregiver get before working alone, and every year after?
- How do staff respond when a resident is agitated, frightened or tries to leave?
- How many caregivers are on duty during the day and at night?
- What happens if care needs increase? When would someone need to move?
- What fees are charged at move-in?
- How do you tell families about falls, illness or changes?
What we checked12 public sources we searched, with dates
Every public source we searched for this community. “Nothing on record” means we found no record that matched it. A record can be missed when a name or address differs.
| Source | Data as of | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division inspection records | Sep 28, 2026 | See above |
| U.S. Department of Labor wage and hour cases | Oct 15, 2026 | See above |
| OSHA workplace safety inspections since 2016 | Oct 15, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| FEMA flood map | See above | |
| USDA wildfire risk | Apr 15, 2026 | Not shown: FEMA rates wildfire risk here relatively low |
| FEMA National Risk Index | See above | |
| CMS hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors; OpenStreetMap pharmacies | See above | |
| HUD Multifamily Properties - Assisted | Jul 6, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| State Veterans Homes (NASVH directory) | Sep 20, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| CMS Hospice - General Information | Aug 19, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| CMS Home Health Care Agencies | May 27, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| The community’s own website | See above |
Common questionsAnswers to 4 questions families ask
What type of care does Lindstrom Senior Living provide?
Lindstrom Senior Living is licensed by the state of Minnesota for assisted living, memory care in Lindstrom, Minnesota. Its licensed capacity is 102 residents.
Does Lilisity rate Lindstrom Senior Living?
No. We publish state licensing details for Lindstrom Senior Living but no score, rating, or ranking. Only communities on the Top Communities list or with a Senior Living Alliance Excellence Award, both based on phone-verified resident and family interviews, are ranked.
How much does Lindstrom Senior Living cost?
Assisted Living in Minnesota typically starts at $2,200 to $4,800 a month. Based on 74 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price. Lindstrom Senior Living does not publish its prices.
How do I contact Lindstrom Senior Living?
Use Lindstrom Senior Living's website, lindstromseniorliving.com, or visit at 30455 Lehigh Avenue, Lindstrom, MN 55045.
How Lilisity works. The only scores or rankings Lilisity publishes are the Top Communities list and the Excellence Awards, both built from phone-verified resident and family interviews. Communities can pay Lilisity a flat monthly fee to manage their own listing: photos, prices, contact details, and receiving the inquiries families choose to send them. The fee is the same no matter how many families contact them or move in. Senior Living Alliance, which runs Lilisity, offers the same listing to its member communities as part of their membership; members pay SLA for its resident and family interview program. No community pays Lilisity per inquiry, per referral or per move-in. Payment never changes a testimonial, a rating, or the order of search results. The "Nearby Senior Living Alliance communities" box shows member communities only. How we verify testimonials · How we are paid