Covered Bridge

Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide the physical environment in a continuous state of good repair and operation with regard to the health, safety, and well-being of the residents.

MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to provide the physical environment in a continuous state of good repair and operation with regard to the health, safety, and well-being of the residents. This had the potential to directly affect all residents and staff. [...]”

Rule cited: “(4) keep the physical environment, including walls, floors, ceiling, all furnishings, grounds, systems, and equipment in a continuous state of good repair and operation with regard to the health, safety, comfort, and well-being of the residents in accordance [...]”

Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide the required staff training and evacuation drill frequency for fire safety and evacuation.

MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview, the licensee failed to provide the required staff training and evacuation drill frequency for fire safety and evacuation. This had the potential to affect all residents and staff. [...]”

Rule cited: “(b) Each assisted living facility shall develop and maintain fire safety and evacuation plans. [...]”

Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure insulin administration via a prefilled insulin pen was according to manufacturer instructions, for one of one resident (R1) with record reviewed.

MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure insulin administration via a prefilled insulin pen was according to manufacturer instructions, for one of one resident (R1) with record reviewed. [...]”

Rule cited: “Each medication administered by the assisted living facility staff must be documented in the resident's record. The documentation must include the signature and title of the person who administered the medication. [...]”

Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to establish and maintain an infection control program that complied with accepted health care, medical and nursing standards for infection control.

MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to establish and maintain an infection control program that complied with accepted health care, medical and nursing standards for infection control. This had the potential to affect all eleven residents and all staff working at the facility. [...]”

Rule cited: “(a) All assisted living facilities must establish and maintain an infection control program that complies with accepted health care, medical, and nursing standards for infection control. [...]”

Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to engage in and maintain documentation of a quality management activity.

MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to engage in and maintain documentation of a quality management activity. This had the potential to affect all eleven residents receiving Assisted Living services. [...]”

Rule cited: “The facility shall engage in quality management appropriate to the size of the facility and relevant to the type of services provided. [...]”

Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to support protection and safety by not posting the 911 emergency number in common areas and near telephones provided by the assisted living facility.

MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to support protection and safety by not posting the 911 emergency number in common areas and near telephones provided by the assisted living facility. This had the potential to affect all eleven residents receiving assisted living services. [...]”

Rule cited: “The facility shall support protection and safety through access to the state's systems for reporting suspected criminal activity and suspected vulnerable adult maltreatment by: (1) posting the 911 emergency number in common areas and near telephones provided [...]”

Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to maintain a tuberculosis (TB) prevention and control program, based on the most current guidelines issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to maintain a tuberculosis (TB) prevention and control program, based on the most current guidelines issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The licensee failed to ensure history and symptoms screening and screening for active TB (either a two-step tuberculin skin test (TST) or blood test) were completed and documented for two of two unlicensed personnel (ULP-J, ULP-F) with employee records reviewed. [...]”

Rule cited: “(a) The facility must establish and maintain a comprehensive tuberculosis infection control program according to the most current tuberculosis infection control guidelines issued by the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Division [...]”

Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop and implement a written emergency disaster plan.

MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to develop and implement a written emergency disaster plan. In addtion, the licensee's building lacked a functional furnace (a heating unit used to heat up an entire building). The licensee implemented space heaters for nine of eleven residents, however, the space heaters were not implemented according to manufacturers instructions. This created a potential fire hazard that affected all eleven residents and all staff. [...]”

Rule cited: “(a) The facility must meet the following requirements: (1) have a written emergency disaster plan that contains a plan for evacuation, addresses elements of sheltering in place, identifies temporary relocation sites, and details staff assignments in the event [...]”

Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the resident record included documentation of significant changes in the resident's status and action taken in response to the needs of the resident after a change in condition, for one of one resident (R1) with record reviewed.

MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the resident record included documentation of significant changes in the resident's status and action taken in response to the needs of the resident after a change in condition, for one of one resident (R1) with record reviewed. [...]”

Rule cited: “Contents of a resident record include the following for each resident: (1) identifying information, including the resident's name, date of birth, address, and telephone number; (2) the name, address, and telephone number of the resident's emergency contact, [...]”

Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide space for outdoor activities for residents.

MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observations and interview, the licensee failed to provide space for outdoor activities for residents. This had the potential to directly affect the well-being of all eleven residents. [...]”

Rule cited: “The following are required for all assisted living facilities: (1) public utilities must be available, and working or inspected and approved water and septic systems must be in place; (2) the location must be publicly accessible to fire department services [...]”

Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide and maintain smoke alarms that complied with fire protection requirements.

MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to provide and maintain smoke alarms that complied with fire protection requirements. This had the potential to directly affect all residents and all staff. [...]”

Rule cited: “(a) Each assisted living facility must comply with the State Fire Code in Minnesota Rules, chapter 7511, and: (1) for dwellings or sleeping units, as defined in the State Fire Code: (i) provide smoke alarms in each room used for sleeping purposes; (ii) [...]”

Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to keep the physical environment, systems, and equipment in a continuous state of good repair and operation with regard to the health, safety, comfort, and well-being of the residents in accordance with a maintenance and repair program when the heating system failed with no inspection or repairs.

MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to keep the physical environment, systems, and equipment in a continuous state of good repair and operation with regard to the health, safety, comfort, and well-being of the residents in accordance with a maintenance and repair program when the heating system failed with no inspection or repairs. [...]”

Rule cited: “(4) keep the physical environment, including walls, floors, ceiling, all furnishings, grounds, systems, and equipment in a continuous state of good repair and operation with regard to the health, safety, comfort, and well-being of the residents in accordance [...]”

Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide the required staff

MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on record review and interview, the licensee failed to provide the required staff training and evacuation drill frequency for fire safety and evacuation. This had the potential to affect all residents and all staff. [...]”

Rule cited: “(b) Each assisted living facility shall develop and maintain fire safety and evacuation plans. [...]”

Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to execute an Assisted Living contract for ten of eleven residents receiving Assisted Living services.

MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to execute an Assisted Living contract for ten of eleven residents receiving Assisted Living services. This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety), and was issued at a widespread scope (when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has affected or has the potential to affect a large [...]”

Rule cited: “(a) An assisted living facility may not offer or provide housing or assisted living services to any individual unless it has executed a written contract with the resident. [...]”

Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to execute a written assisted living contract with the required content for ten of eleven residents.

MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to execute a written assisted living contract with the required content for ten of eleven residents. This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety), and was issued at a widespread scope (when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has affected or has the potential to affect a large portion [...]”

Rule cited: “(a) The contract must include in a conspicuous place and manner on the contract the legal name and the license number of the facility. [...]”

Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure employees received orientation to assisted living facility licensing

MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure employees received orientation to assisted living facility licensing requirements and regulations for two of two unlicensed personnel (ULP-J, ULP-F) with employee records reviewed. [...]”

Rule cited: “(a) The orientation must contain the following topics: (1) an overview of this chapter; (2) an introduction and review of the facility's policies and procedures related to the provision of assisted living services by the individual staff person; (3) handling [...]”

Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure medications were administered as prescribed for one of one resident (R1) reviewed for medication administration.

MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure medications were administered as prescribed for one of one resident (R1) reviewed for medication administration. [...]”

Rule cited: “Each medication administered by the assisted living facility staff must be documented in the resident's record. The documentation must include the signature and title of the person who administered the medication. [...]”

Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure all medications were securely locked in substantially constructed compartments and would permit only authorized personnel access, this had the potiential to affect all residents.

MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure all medications were securely locked in substantially constructed compartments and would permit only authorized personnel access, this had the potiential to affect all residents. [...]”

Rule cited: “An assisted living facility must store all prescription medications in securely locked and substantially constructed compartments according to the manufacturer's directions and permit only authorized personnel to have access.”

Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to post in a conspicuous place, information about the facilities' grievance procedure, and the name, telephone number, and e-mail contact information for the individuals who are responsible for handling resident grievances.

MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to post in a conspicuous place, information about the facilities' grievance procedure, and the name, telephone number, and e-mail contact information for the individuals who are responsible for handling resident grievances. [...]”

Rule cited: “All facilities must post in a conspicuous place information about the facilities' grievance procedure, and the name, telephone number, and e-mail contact information for the individuals who are responsible for handling resident grievances. [...]”

Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to engage in and maintain documentation of quality management activity.

MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to engage in and maintain documentation of quality management activity. This had the potential to affect all nine residents receiving assisted living services. [...]”

Rule cited: “The facility shall engage in quality management appropriate to the size of the facility and relevant to the type of services provided. [...]”

Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure an individual abuse prevention plan was updated for one of two residents (R1) with records reviewed.

MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure an individual abuse prevention plan was updated for one of two residents (R1) with records reviewed. [...]”

Rule cited: “(b) The facility must develop and implement an individual abuse prevention plan for each vulnerable adult. [...]”

Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to support protection and safety by not posting information and phone numbers for reporting to the Minnesota Adult Abuse Reporting Center and failed to post the 911 emergency number in common areas and near telephones provided by the assisted living facility.

MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to support protection and safety by not posting information and phone numbers for reporting to the Minnesota Adult Abuse Reporting Center and failed to post the 911 emergency number in common areas and near telephones provided by the assisted living facility. This had the potential to affect all nine residents receiving assisted living services. [...]”

Rule cited: “The facility shall support protection and safety through access to the state's systems for reporting suspected criminal activity and suspected vulnerable adult maltreatment by: (1) posting the 911 emergency number in common areas and near telephones provided [...]”

Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure employee records included all required content for two of two employees (ULP-F, ULP-D) with employee records reviewed.

MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure employee records included all required content for two of two employees (ULP-F, ULP-D) with employee records reviewed. [...]”

Rule cited: “(a) The facility must maintain current records of each paid employee, each regularly scheduled volunteer providing services, and each individual contractor providing services. [...]”

Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to maintain a tuberculosis (TB) prevention and control program, based on the most current guidelines issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to maintain a tuberculosis (TB) prevention and control program, based on the most current guidelines issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The licensee failed to ensure history and symptoms screening and screening for active TB (either a two-step tuberculin skin test (TST) or blood test) were completed and documented for two of two employees (ULP-D, ULP-F) with employee records reviewed. [...]”

Rule cited: “(a) The facility must establish and maintain a comprehensive tuberculosis infection control program according to the most current tuberculosis infection control guidelines issued by the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Division [...]”

Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to have a written emergency disaster plan with all required content and failed to post an emergency plan prominently.

MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to have a written emergency disaster plan with all required content and failed to post an emergency plan prominently. This had the potential to affect all nine residents receiving assisted living services. [...]”

Rule cited: “(a) The facility must meet the following requirements: (1) have a written emergency disaster plan that contains a plan for evacuation, addresses elements of sheltering in place, identifies temporary relocation sites, and details staff assignments in the event [...]”

Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the client record included documentation of significant

MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the client record included documentation of significant changes in the residents status and action taken in response to the needs of the resident after a change in condition, for one of one resident (R1) with record reviewed. [...]”

Rule cited: “Contents of a resident record include the following for each resident: (1) identifying information, including the resident's name, date of birth, address, and telephone number; (2) the name, address, and telephone number of the resident's emergency contact, [...]”

Summary: MDH found the facility failed to provide space for outdoor activities for residents.

MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observations and interview, the facility failed to provide space for outdoor activities for residents. This had the potential to directly affect the well-being of all nine residents. [...]”

Rule cited: “The following are required for all assisted living facilities: (1) public utilities must be available, and working or inspected and approved water and septic systems must be in place; (2) the location must be publicly accessible to fire department services [...]”

Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to comply with the State Fire Code.

MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to comply with the State Fire Code. This had the potential to affect all nine residents receiving assisted living services and all staff. This resulted in an immediate correction order. [...]”

Rule cited: “(a) Each assisted living facility must comply with the State Fire Code in Minnesota Rules, chapter 7511, and: (1) for dwellings or sleeping units, as defined in the State Fire Code: (i) provide smoke alarms in each room used for sleeping purposes; (ii) [...]”

MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observations and staff interview, facility failed to provide and maintain the building physical environment including walls, floors, ceiling, furnishings, equipment including air handling system in a continuous state of good repair and operation for health, comfort, and well-being of residents in accordance with a maintenance and repair program. This has the potential to directly affect all residents and staff. [...]”

Rule cited: “(4) keep the physical environment, including walls, floors, ceiling, all furnishings, grounds, systems, and equipment in a continuous state of good repair and operation with regard to the health, safety, comfort, and well-being of the residents in accordance [...]”

Summary: MDH found the facility failed to provide the required documentation on fire safety and evacuation plans and the required training and records.

MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on the review of the emergency plan provided for the facility and interview with housing manager, the facility failed to provide the required documentation on fire safety and evacuation plans and the required training and records. This has the potential to directly affect safety of all nine residents and all staff. [...]”

Rule cited: “(b) Each assisted living facility shall develop and maintain fire safety and evacuation plans. [...]”

Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide and maintain the building electrical system in a continuous state of good repair and operation for health, comfort, and well-being of residents.

MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observations and staff interview, the licensee failed to provide and maintain the building electrical system in a continuous state of good repair and operation for health, comfort, and well-being of residents. In addition, the licensee failed to provide and maintain the building smoke alarms in a continuous state of good repair and operation for health, comfort, and well-being of residents. This has the potential to directly affect all residents and staff. [...]”

Rule cited: “(g) Existing construction or elements, including assisted living facilities that were registered as housing with services establishments under chapter 144D prior to August 1, 2021, shall be permitted to continue in use provided such use does not constitute a [...]”

MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observations and staff interview, facility failed to comply with applicable state and local governing laws. This has the potential to directly affect all nine residents and all staff. [...]”

Rule cited: “Assisted living facilities shall comply with all applicable state and local governing laws, regulations, standards, ordinances, and codes for fire safety, building, and zoning requirements.”

Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to execute an Assisted Living contract to include all required content for nine of nine residents receiving assisted living services.

MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to execute an Assisted Living contract to include all required content for nine of nine residents receiving assisted living services. [...]”

Rule cited: “(a) An assisted living facility may not offer or provide housing or assisted living services to any individual unless it has executed a written contract with the resident. [...]”

Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to execute a written assisted living contract with the required content for nine of nine residents.

MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to execute a written assisted living contract with the required content for nine of nine residents. This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a client's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a client's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death), and was issued at a widespread scope (when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure [...]”

Rule cited: “(a) The contract must include in a conspicuous place and manner on the contract the legal name and the license number of the facility. [...]”

Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure one of two employees (ULP-F) completed training and competency evaluations in all required training topics.

MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure one of two employees (ULP-F) completed training and competency evaluations in all required training topics. [...]”

Rule cited: “(a) Unlicensed personnel providing assisted living services must have: (1) successfully completed a training and competency evaluation appropriate to the services provided by the facility and the topics listed in section 144G.61, subdivision 2, paragraph (a); [...]”

Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure one of two employees (ULP-F) completed training and competency evaluations in all required training topics.

MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure one of two employees (ULP-F) completed training and competency evaluations in all required training topics. [...]”

Rule cited: “(b) Unlicensed personnel performing delegated nursing tasks in an assisted living facility must: (1) have successfully completed training and demonstrated competency by successfully completing a written or oral test of the topics in section 144G.61, [...]”

Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure documentation of direct

MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure documentation of direct supervision of unlicensed personnel (ULP) for one of two employees (ULP-F) with employee records reviewed. [...]”

Rule cited: “(a) Staff who only provide assisted living services specified in section 144G.08, subdivision 9, clauses (1) to (5), must be supervised periodically where the services are being provided to verify that the work is being performed competently and to identify [...]”

Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure employees received orientation to assisted living facility licensing requirements and regulations for two of two employees (ULP-D, ULP-F) with employee records reviewed.

MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure employees received orientation to assisted living facility licensing requirements and regulations for two of two employees (ULP-D, ULP-F) with employee records reviewed. [...]”

Rule cited: “(a) The orientation must contain the following topics: (1) an overview of this chapter; (2) an introduction and review of the facility's policies and procedures related to the provision of assisted living services by the individual staff person; (3) handling [...]”

Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure required dementia care training for two of two employees (ULP-D, ULP-F) with employee records reviewed.

MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure required dementia care training for two of two employees (ULP-D, ULP-F) with employee records reviewed. [...]”

Rule cited: “All direct care staff and supervisors providing direct services must demonstrate an understanding of the training specified in section 144G.64.”

Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) completed a comprehensive re-assessment following a change of condition (hospitalization) for one of two residents (R1) with records reviewed.

MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) completed a comprehensive re-assessment following a change of condition (hospitalization) for one of two residents (R1) with records reviewed. [...]”

Rule cited: “(c) Resident reassessment and monitoring must be conducted no more than 14 calendar days after initiation of services. [...]”

Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) completed annual medication re-assessments for one of two residents (R1) with records reviewed.

MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) completed annual medication re-assessments for one of two residents (R1) with records reviewed. [...]”

Rule cited: “The assisted living facility must monitor and reassess the resident's medication management services as needed under subdivision 2 when the resident presents with symptoms or other issues that may be medication-related and, at a minimum, annually.”

Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure one of two employees (ULP-F) had been trained and competency tested prior to delegating administering medications.

MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure one of two employees (ULP-F) had been trained and competency tested prior to delegating administering medications. [...]”

Rule cited: “Medications may be administered by a nurse, physician, or other licensed health practitioner authorized to administer medications or by unlicensed personnel who have been delegated medication administration tasks by a registered nurse.”

Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the residents medication management plan included resident specific instructions related to priming of insulin pens prior to use for two of two residents (R1, R2) and dating time sensitive medications when opened for R1.

MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the residents medication management plan included resident specific instructions related to priming of insulin pens prior to use for two of two residents (R1, R2) and dating time sensitive medications when opened for R1. [...]”

Rule cited: “Each medication administered by the assisted living facility staff must be documented in the resident's record. The documentation must include the signature and title of the person who administered the medication. [...]”

Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure all medications were securely locked in substantially constructed compartments and permit only authorized personnel had access.

MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure all medications were securely locked in substantially constructed compartments and permit only authorized personnel had access. [...]”

Rule cited: “An assisted living facility must store all prescription medications in securely locked and substantially constructed compartments according to the manufacturer's directions and permit only authorized personnel to have access.”

Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop a treatment management plan to include all required content for one of two residents (R2) with blood glucose monitoring.

MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to develop a treatment management plan to include all required content for one of two residents (R2) with blood glucose monitoring. [...]”

Rule cited: “For each resident receiving management of ordered or prescribed treatments or therapy services, the assisted living facility must prepare and include in the service plan a written statement of the treatment or therapy services that will be provided to the [...]”

Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure all residents had received and had written acknowledgement of receipt of the new Assisted Living Bill of Rights and information about how to make a complaint.

MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure all residents had received and had written acknowledgement of receipt of the new Assisted Living Bill of Rights and information about how to make a complaint. This had the potential to affect all nine assisted living residents. [...]”

Rule cited: “(a) An assisted living facility must provide the resident a written notice of the rights under section 144G.91 before the initiation of services to that resident. [...]”

Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide care and services according to acceptable health care standards, medical or nursing standards for one of one resident (R2) who utilized bed rails, with record reviewed.

MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to provide care and services according to acceptable health care standards, medical or nursing standards for one of one resident (R2) who utilized bed rails, with record reviewed. [...]”

Rule cited: “(a) Residents have the right to care and assisted living services that are appropriate based on the resident's needs and according to an up-to-date service plan subject to accepted health care standards.”

Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the required notice was posted at the main entry way of the establishment to display statutory language to disclose electronic monitoring activity, potentially affecting all nine clients in the assisted living facility, staff and any visitors of the licensee.

MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the required notice was posted at the main entry way of the establishment to display statutory language to disclose electronic monitoring activity, potentially affecting all nine clients in the assisted living facility, staff and any visitors of the licensee. [...]”

Rule cited: “Residents have the right to individual autonomy, initiative, and independence in making life choices, including establishing a daily schedule and choosing with whom to interact.”