Generations Home Care

Last evaluation

February 4, 2025

Evaluations on record

2

Investigations substantiated

1 kept 7 years

Inconclusive

0 kept 4 years

Unsubstantiated

2 kept 3 years

Most recent evaluation (February 4, 2025, state report WDVG11)

MDH: “On January 27, 2025, through January 29, 2025, the Minnesota Department of Health conducted a full survey at the above provider.”

Survey completed January 31, 2025: 5 correction orders

• Tag 480: 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Subd. 1a (a-b) Minimum requirements; required food services Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Please refer to the FBEIR for any compliance dates
  Details

  Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code.

  MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code. This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety) and was issued at a widespread scope (when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has affected or has the potential to affect a large portion or all the [...]”

  Rule cited: “(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b), food must be prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code, Minnesota Rules, chapter 4626. [...]”

• Tag 485: 144G.41 Subdivision 1.a (a) Minimum requirements; required food services Level 1, widespread scope, scope/level letter C · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
  Details

  Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to post a complete menu a week in advance that was made available to all residents.

  MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, and interview, the licensee failed to post a complete menu a week in advance that was made available to all residents. This had the potential to affect all residents of the facility. [...]”

  Rule cited: “All assisted living facilities must offer to provide or make available at least three nutritious meals daily with snacks available seven days per week, according to the recommended dietary allowances in the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) [...]”

• Tag 1620: 144G.70 Subd. 2 (c-e) Initial reviews, assessments, and monitoring Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
  Details

  Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) conducted ongoing resident monitoring and reassessment, utilizing a uniform assessment tool, no more than 90 days from the previous assessment for one of one resident (R1).

  MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) conducted ongoing resident monitoring and reassessment, utilizing a uniform assessment tool, no more than 90 days from the previous assessment for one of one resident (R1). [...]”

  Rule cited: “(c) Resident reassessment and monitoring must be conducted no more than 14 calendar days after initiation of services. [...]”

• Tag 1890: 144G.71 Subd. 20 Prescription drugs Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
  Details

  Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure medications were maintained to include the opened and/or expiration date for time sensitive medications administer by the licensee for one of one resident (R1).

  MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure medications were maintained to include the opened and/or expiration date for time sensitive medications administer by the licensee for one of one resident (R1). [...]”

  Rule cited: “A prescription drug, prior to being set up for immediate or later administration, must be kept in the original container in which it was dispensed by the pharmacy bearing the original prescription label with legible information including the expiration or [...]”

• Tag 1950: 144G.72 Subd. 4 Administration of treatments and therapy Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
  Details

  Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure prior to delegating therapy and treatment tasks, unlicensed personnel (ULP-E) demonstrated training and competency to a registered nurse (RN) for one of one resident (R1).

  MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure prior to delegating therapy and treatment tasks, unlicensed personnel (ULP-E) demonstrated training and competency to a registered nurse (RN) for one of one resident (R1). [...]”

  Rule cited: “Ordered or prescribed treatments or therapies must be administered by a nurse, physician, or other licensed health professional authorized to perform the treatment or therapy, or may be delegated or assigned to unlicensed personnel by the licensed health [...]”

From MDH’s letter: the letter says the facility is in substantial compliance; no immediate fines.

Substantiated investigations (state reports)

• March 14, 2023 · report HL366913924M · MDH finding: Substantiated, individual responsibility
  Details

  Allegation, as written: “The alleged perpetrator (AP), unlicensed facility staff, financially exploited a resident when the AP purchased a vehicle from the resident. In addition, the AP refused to pay the resident for the mutually agreed upon purchase price for the vehicle.”

  “The Minnesota Department of Health determined financial exploitation was substantiated.”

  “The AP was responsible for the maltreatment.”

  Summary: MDH looked into an allegation and found: financial exploitation substantiated (individual responsibility).

  MDH’s conclusion, as written: “The Minnesota Department of Health determined financial exploitation was substantiated. The AP was responsible for the maltreatment. The AP purchased a vehicle from the resident and then refused to pay the agreed upon amount for the vehicle.”

  Action taken by facility: “The AP is no longer employed by the facility.”

  Action taken by MDH: “The facility was issued a correction order regarding the vulnerable adult's right to be free from maltreatment.”

  Survey completed February 15, 2023: 4 correction orders

  • Tag 620: 144G.42 Subd. 6 (a) Compliance with requirements for reporting ma Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) Days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed implement their policy to immediately report to the Minnesota Adult Abuse Reporting Center (MAARC) suspected maltreatment of one of one (R1) residents reviewed for maltreatment.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on document review and interview, the licensee failed implement their policy to immediately report to the Minnesota Adult Abuse Reporting Center (MAARC) suspected maltreatment of one of one (R1) residents reviewed for maltreatment. R1 reported to staff unlicensed personnel (ULP)-B financially exploited R1 when ULP-B purchased a vehicle from R1 and refused to pay R1 the agreed amount for the vehicle. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) The assisted living facility must comply with the requirements for the reporting of maltreatment of vulnerable adults in section 626.557. [...]”

  • Tag 1290: 144G.60 Subdivision 1 Background studies required Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide direct and continuous supervision as directed by the employees background study for one of one unlicensed personnel (ULP-B) investigated for maltreatment.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on document review and interview, the licensee failed to provide direct and continuous supervision as directed by the employees background study for one of one unlicensed personnel (ULP-B) investigated for maltreatment. This failure had the ability to affect all six residents at the facility. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) Employees, contractors, and regularly scheduled volunteers of the facility are subject to the background study required by section 144.057 and may be disqualified under chapter 245C. [...]”

  • Tag 2360: 144G.91 Subd. 8 Freedom from maltreatment
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the facility failed to ensure one of one residents reviewed (R1) was free from maltreatment.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “The facility failed to ensure one of one residents reviewed (R1) was free from maltreatment. Findings include: The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) issued a determination maltreatment occurred, and the Alleged Perpetrator (AP) was responsible for the maltreatment, in connection with incidents which occurred at the facility. Please refer to the public maltreatment report for details. No plan of correction is required for this tag. Please refer to the public maltreatment report for details.”

    Rule cited: “Residents have the right to be free from physical, sexual, and emotional abuse; neglect; financial exploitation; and all forms of maltreatment covered under the Vulnerable Adults Act.”

  • Tag 3000: 626.557 Subd. 3 Timing of report Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) Days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to immediately report to the Minnesota Adult Abuse Reporting Center (MAARC) suspected maltreatment of one of one (R1) residents reviewed for maltreatment.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on document review and interview, the licensee failed to immediately report to the Minnesota Adult Abuse Reporting Center (MAARC) suspected maltreatment of one of one (R1) residents reviewed for maltreatment. R1 reported to staff that unlicensed personnel (ULP)-B financially exploited R1 when ULP-B purchased a vehicle from R1 and refused to pay for the entire agreed upon amount of the vehicle. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) A mandated reporter who has reason to believe that a vulnerable adult is being or has been maltreated, or who has knowledge that a vulnerable adult has sustained a physical injury which is not reasonably explained shall immediately report the information [...]”

Summaries are ours and are marked “Summary”; quoted text is MDH’s own, shortened where marked [...]. Read the full reports at the links above or search every report on MDH’s site.

MDH keeps investigation results for seven years when allegations are substantiated, four years when inconclusive, and three years when unsubstantiated, so the counts cover different periods. This community is licensed for 6 residents; larger communities are evaluated and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division, data as of September 28, 2026. Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.