Assisted Living
The Forum at Tucson
2500 North Rosemont Boulevard, Tucson, AZ 85712 · Map
Licensed for 130 residents
The Forum at Tucson is a state-licensed assisted living community in Tucson, Arizona. It is licensed for 130 residents. Lilisity publishes no score or ranking for this community; the details below come from the state licensing record.
Prices
This community does not publish its prices.
Area costs
Lilisity’s independent report
What the public record shows
Gathered by Lilisity from state and federal sources. Communities can’t edit this part of the page.
State inspections
Last inspection: Aug 4, 2026. See the record
License
Active, 130 residents
Assisted Living Center-Directed AL11254C.
Nearest emergency room
0.3 miles
Tucson Medical Center, rated 2 of 5 stars by CMS.
Side by side with nearby communities
The 4 nearest communities that offer assisted living, by straight-line distance. Prices are starting prices each community publishes; we never show estimates.
| Community | Distance | Licensed capacity | Published starting price | License | Inspection citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Forum at Tucson this community | 130 | Not published | Active | 37 deficiencies, 3 enforcement cases | |
| Tucson Gardens Memory Care | 0.3 mi | 70 | Not published | Active | 23 deficiencies, 3 enforcement cases |
| The Rubin Community for Senior Living | 0.3 mi | 96 | Not published | Active | 38 deficiencies, 4 enforcement cases |
| Khadi Care Center | 0.5 mi | 10 | Not published | Active | 7 deficiencies, 1 enforcement case |
| Caring for Generations | 0.6 mi | 10 | Not published | Active | 6 deficiencies, 1 enforcement case |
State inspection record37 deficiencies, 3 enforcement cases
- Last inspection
- August 4, 2026
- Inspections
- 7, 37 deficiencies cited
- Complaint inspections
- 4, 4 with deficiencies cited
- Enforcement cases
- 3, $1,250 in civil penalties
- License active since 2019
Enforcement cases
- May 11, 2026: Civil Penalty $750 (complete); Notice of Enforcement Action (complete) case closed (complete)
- March 23, 2026: Civil Penalty $250 (complete); Notice of Enforcement Action (complete) case closed (complete)
- February 20, 2025: Civil Penalty $250 (complete) case closed (complete)
February 24, 2026: compliance (annual) inspection, 9 deficiencies
- Service Plans R9-10-808.A.3.e.i.1-4
Based on record review and interview, for two of two sampled residents who required behavioral care, the manager failed to ensure a service plan included the psychosocial interactions or behaviors for which the resident required assistance, the psychotropic medications ordered for the resident, planned strategies and actions for changing the resident’s psychosocial interactions or behaviors, and goals for changes in the resident’s psychosocial interactions or behaviors.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: March 24, 2026 - Service Plans R9-10-808.A.4.b.ii
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a resident's service plan was updated at least once every six months, for two of nine sampled residents receiving personal care services. The deficient practice posed a risk if the service plan was not developed to articulate decisions and agreements.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: March 2, 2026 - Service Plans R9-10-808.A.5.a-d
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a service plan, when initially developed and when updated, was signed and dated by the resident or resident's representative, the manager, and the nurse, medical practitioner, or behavioral health professional who reviewed the service plan, for two of nine sampled residents. The deficient practice posed a risk if the service plan was not developed to articulate decisions and agreements.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: June 4, 2026 - Service Plans R9-10-808.C.1.g
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a caregiver or an assistant caregiver documented the services provided in a resident's medical record, for one of nine sampled residents. The deficient practice posed a risk as services could not be verified as provided against a service plan.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: February 26, 2026 - Medical Records R9-10-811.C.12
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a resident's medical record contained a medication order from a medical practitioner for each medication administered to the resident, for three of five sampled residents receiving medication administration.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: May 28, 2026
Show all 9
- Behavioral Care R9-10-812.1-3
Based on record review and interview, the manager retained two of two sampled residents who required behavioral care without meeting the requirements, to include documentation to demonstrate a behavioral health professional or medical practitioner had examined the resident at least once every six months throughout the duration of the resident's condition; reviewed the facility's scope of services; and signed and dated a determination stating the resident's needs were being met at the facility.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: June 22, 2026 - Medication Services R9-10-817.B.3.b
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a medication administered to a resident was administered in compliance with a medication order, for three of five sampled residents receiving medication administration.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: February 26, 2026 - Food Services R9-10-818.C.1
Based on observation and interview, the manager failed to ensure food was stored free from spoilage and safe for human consumption.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: February 26, 2026 - and 1 more in the report
January 5, 2026: complaint inspection, 1 deficiency
- Service Plans R9-10-808.C.1.a-g
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a caregiver provided a resident with the assisted living services in the resident's service plan and documented the services provided in the resident's medical record, for one of five sampled residents.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: January 29, 2026
February 14, 2025: complaint inspection, 11 deficiencies
- Service Plans R9-10-808.A.1
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: February 12, 2025 - Service Plans R9-10-808.A.3.b
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: February 14, 2025 - Service Plans R9-10-808.A.3.c
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: February 14, 2025 - Service Plans R9-10-808.A.4.a
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: February 12, 2025 - Service Plans R9-10-808.A.4.b.ii
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: February 14, 2025
Show all 9
- Service Plans R9-10-808.A.4.b.iii
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: February 14, 2025 - Service Plans R9-10-808.C.1.a
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: February 14, 2025 - R9-10-816.B.3.b R9-10-816.B.3.b
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: February 14, 2025 - and 3 more in the report
January 15, 2025: complaint, compliance (annual) inspection, 11 deficiencies
- Service Plans R9-10-808.A.1
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a resident had a written service plan completed no later than 14 calendar days after the resident's date of acceptance, for one of ten residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk as there was no timely service plan to direct services to be provided to a resident.
Plan of correction accepted - Service Plans R9-10-808.A.3.b
Based on record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a resident had a written service plan which accurately included the level of service the resident was expected to receive, for two of ten residents sampled.
Plan of correction accepted - Service Plans R9-10-808.A.3.c
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure each resident's written service plan accurately included the amount, type and frequency of assisted living services being provided to the resident, including medication administration or assistance in the self-administration of medications, for two of ten residents sampled.
Plan of correction accepted - Service Plans R9-10-808.A.4.a
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a resident's written service plan was reviewed and updated no later than 14 calendar days after a significant change in the resident's physical, cognitive, or functional condition, for one of ten residents sampled.
Plan of correction accepted - Service Plans R9-10-808.A.4.b.ii
Based on record review, and interview, for one of seven residents sampled, who received personal care services, the manager failed to ensure a written service plan was reviewed and updated at least once every six months.
Plan of correction accepted
Show all 9
- Service Plans R9-10-808.A.4.b.iii
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a written service plan was updated at least once every three months, for one of three residents sampled receiving directed care services.
Plan of correction accepted - Service Plans R9-10-808.C.1.a
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a caregiver provided a resident with the assisted living services in the resident's service plan, for one of ten residents sampled.
Plan of correction accepted - R9-10-816.B.3.b R9-10-816.B.3.b
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a medication administered to a resident was administered in compliance with a medication order, for one of ten residents sampled who received medication administration. The deficient practice posed a risk if a resident experienced a change in condition due to improper administration of medication.
Plan of correction accepted - and 3 more in the report
Other inspection reports
- August 4, 2026: modification inspection. On August 4, 2026, an off-site modification inspection was conducted. Read the Statement of Deficiencies on AZ Care Check.
Read the full record on AZ Care Check →
ADHS writes a Statement of Deficiencies after each inspection that finds a rule was not met. The community then files a plan of correction, which ADHS accepts or rejects. ADHS investigates complaints on site. A complaint inspection that ends with “No deficiencies were found” did not find a rule violation; deficiencies cited on a complaint inspection are listed with that inspection. AZ Care Check does not list complaints that did not lead to an on-site inspection. Enforcement cases are actions ADHS takes after an inspection, such as a civil money penalty, a provisional license or a license revocation, with their status. This community is licensed for 130 residents; larger communities are inspected and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Arizona Department of Health Services, Licensing Services, AZ Care Check, data as of October 15, 2026, showing all records on AZ Care Check (back to September 5, 2023). Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.
License and ownershipActive license
- License type
- Assisted Living Center-Directed
- License number
- AL11254C
- License status
- Active
- Licensed capacity
- 130
- County
- Pima County
Source: Arizona state licensing records (agency listing), retrieved 2026-09-09. Licensing status is a matter of public record; it is not a quality rating.
Paying with Medicaid and other programsHow Medicaid pays for care in Arizona, and other programs
How Medicaid pays for care in Arizona
- Arizona Long Term Care System (ALTCS). Yes. Arizona's Medicaid long-term care program, ALTCS, is for people who need nursing facility level of care. Members do not have to live in a nursing home, and many live in an assisted living facility and get needed services there. (state page)
Ask the community whether it accepts Medicaid.
Location and nearby careNearest hospital 0.3 mi, nursing home 0.3 mi, pharmacy 0.2 mi
- Nearest hospital with an emergency room
- Tucson Medical Center, Tucson. 0.3 miles away, straight line. CMS overall hospital rating: 2 of 5 stars.
- Nearest Medicare nursing home
- Foothills Rehabilitation Center, Tucson. 0.3 miles away, straight line.
- Nearest home health agency office
- Nsi Nursing Service, Inc., Tucson. 0.2 miles away, straight line. Agencies travel to clients, so ask which ones serve this address.
- Nearest pharmacy
- CVS Pharmacy. 0.2 miles away, straight line. From OpenStreetMap, which does not list every pharmacy, so one may be closer.
- Area
- USDA classes ZIP code 85712 as metropolitan (metropolitan core).
- Dialysis within 15 miles
- Davita Swan Dialysis, Tucson, 0.9 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 4 of 5 stars)
032643 East Tucson (Fmc), Tucson, 1.7 miles away, straight line (has a shift starting after 5 pm; CMS rating 3 of 5 stars)
Davita Tucson Central Dialysis, Tucson, 2.6 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 4 of 5 stars) - Hospice
- 34 Medicare hospices tell CMS they serve ZIP code 85712.
Grace Hospice And Palliative Care LLC, office in Tucson, 0.3 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 2 of 5 stars)
T M C Hospice Aka Peppi'S House, office in Tucson, 0.3 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 5 of 5 stars)
Arista Hospice, office in Tucson, 0.9 miles away, straight line - Nearest geriatric medicine practice
- Banner-University Medical Group, Tucson. 2.3 miles away, straight line. 2 geriatric medicine doctors listed there.
Distances are straight lines from the community, not driving distance. Hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors come from CMS provider data (CMS, hospital list updated Jul 22, 2026). Star ratings are CMS’s own.
Emergency and natural hazard riskFEMA overall risk relatively high; outside FEMA's high-risk flood areas
Public hazard maps for this location. Ask the community about its emergency plan, its generator and where residents would go in an evacuation.
- Flood zone
- Outside the high and moderate risk flood areas on FEMA's flood map (Zone X, minimal flood hazard, or not studied). (FEMA flood map)
- FEMA National Risk Index
- Overall: relatively high. By hazard: hurricane very low, inland flooding very high, wildfire very low, tornado very low, heat wave very high, earthquake relatively low. These are FEMA’s ratings for the census tract, compared with tracts nationwide. (FEMA, December 2025)
A flood zone describes the map at this point, not the building's elevation. In an emergency, follow the local emergency management agency.
Questions to ask on a tour10 questions picked for this community from its record
Picked for this community from its record. Ask them in person and write down the answers.
- The state recorded a finding in February 2026. What was it, and how was it fixed?
- What does the base rate include, and when did rates last go up?
- How many caregivers are on duty during the day and at night?
- What happens if care needs increase? When would someone need to move?
- What fees are charged at move-in?
- How do you tell families about falls, illness or changes?
- How long have the executive director and the head of care been here?
- Who gives medications, and what training do they have?
- For what reasons can a resident be asked to leave?
- Is the apartment held during a hospital stay, and at what cost?
What we checked12 public sources we searched, with dates
Every public source we searched for this community. “Nothing on record” means we found no record that matched it. A record can be missed when a name or address differs.
| Source | Data as of | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Arizona Department of Health Services, Licensing Services inspection records | Oct 15, 2026 | See above |
| U.S. Department of Labor wage and hour cases | Oct 15, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| OSHA workplace safety inspections since 2016 | Oct 15, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| FEMA flood map | See above | |
| USDA wildfire risk | Apr 15, 2026 | Not shown: FEMA rates wildfire risk here very low |
| FEMA National Risk Index | See above | |
| CMS hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors; OpenStreetMap pharmacies | See above | |
| HUD Multifamily Properties - Assisted | Jul 6, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| State Veterans Homes (NASVH directory) | Sep 20, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| CMS Hospice - General Information | Aug 19, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| CMS Home Health Care Agencies | May 27, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| The community’s own website | Could not read the site |
Common questionsAnswers to 4 questions families ask
What type of care does The Forum at Tucson provide?
The Forum at Tucson is licensed by the state of Arizona for assisted living in Tucson, Arizona. Its licensed capacity is 130 residents.
Does Lilisity rate The Forum at Tucson?
No. We publish state licensing details for The Forum at Tucson but no score, rating, or ranking. Only communities on the Top Communities list or with a Senior Living Alliance Excellence Award, both based on phone-verified resident and family interviews, are ranked.
How much does The Forum at Tucson cost?
Assisted Living in Arizona typically starts at $3,450 to $5,250 a month. Based on 88 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price. The Forum at Tucson does not publish its prices.
How do I contact The Forum at Tucson?
Use The Forum at Tucson's website, stellarliving.com/communities/the-forum-at-tucson-senior-assisted-living-tucson-az, or visit at 2500 North Rosemont Boulevard, Tucson, AZ 85712.
How Lilisity works. The only scores or rankings Lilisity publishes are the Top Communities list and the Excellence Awards, both built from phone-verified resident and family interviews. Communities can pay Lilisity a flat monthly fee to manage their own listing: photos, prices, contact details, and receiving the inquiries families choose to send them. The fee is the same no matter how many families contact them or move in. Senior Living Alliance, which runs Lilisity, offers the same listing to its member communities as part of their membership; members pay SLA for its resident and family interview program. No community pays Lilisity per inquiry, per referral or per move-in. Payment never changes a testimonial, a rating, or the order of search results. The "Nearby Senior Living Alliance communities" box shows member communities only. How we verify testimonials · How we are paid