Lilisity

Assisted Living

The Rubin Community for Senior Living

2221 North Rosemont Boulevard, Tucson, AZ 85712 · Map
Licensed for 96 residents

State license active
Is this your community? Claim this listing

The Rubin Community for Senior Living is a state-licensed assisted living community in Tucson, Arizona. It is licensed for 96 residents. Lilisity publishes no score or ranking for this community; the details below come from the state licensing record.

Assisted LivingCare offered
96 residentsLicensed capacity
State licensedAssisted living center-directed
$3,450 to $5,250/moTypical assisted living start in Arizona, from 88 communities that publish prices

Prices

This community does not publish its prices.

Area costs

Assisted Living in Arizona typically starts at $3,450 to $5,250 a month. Based on 88 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price.

Lilisity’s independent report

What the public record shows

Gathered by Lilisity from state and federal sources. Communities can’t edit this part of the page.

State inspections

38Deficiencies cited
8Complaint inspections

Last inspection: Sep 11, 2026. See the record

License

Active, 96 residents

Assisted Living Center-Directed AL3061C.

Nearest emergency room

0.3 miles

Tucson Medical Center, rated 2 of 5 stars by CMS.

Side by side with nearby communities

The 4 nearest communities that offer assisted living, by straight-line distance. Prices are starting prices each community publishes; we never show estimates.

CommunityDistanceLicensed capacityPublished starting priceLicenseInspection citations
The Rubin Community for Senior Living this community96Not publishedActive38 deficiencies, 4 enforcement cases
The Forum at Tucson0.3 mi130Not publishedActive37 deficiencies, 3 enforcement cases
Khadi Care Center0.5 mi10Not publishedActive7 deficiencies, 1 enforcement case
Jama Assisted Living0.5 mi10Not publishedActive7 deficiencies, 1 enforcement case
Tucson Gardens Memory Care0.6 mi70Not publishedActive23 deficiencies, 3 enforcement cases
State inspection record38 deficiencies, 4 enforcement cases
Last inspection
September 11, 2026
Inspections
9, 38 deficiencies cited
Complaint inspections
8, 6 with deficiencies cited
Enforcement cases
4, $2,500 in civil penalties
  • License active since 2001

Enforcement cases

  • June 5, 2026: Civil Penalty $1,500 (complete); Notice of Enforcement Action (complete) case closed (complete)
  • February 10, 2026: Civil Penalty $250 (complete); Notice of Enforcement Action (complete) case closed (complete)
  • December 5, 2025: Civil Penalty $250 (complete) case closed (complete)
  • October 28, 2024: Civil Penalty $500 (complete) case closed (complete)

September 11, 2026: complaint inspection, 1 deficiency

  • Service Plans R9-10-808.A.3.a
    Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a service plan included a description of a resident's medical or health problems, including physical, behavioral, cognitive, or functional conditions or impairments, for three of six sampled residents.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: September 28, 2026

August 26, 2026: complaint, compliance (annual) inspection, 7 deficiencies

  • Tuberculosis Screening R9-10-113.A.2.a-f
    Based on documentation review and interview, the health care institution's chief administrative officer failed to ensure the health care institution implemented tuberculosis infection control activities to include annually assessing the health care institution's risk of exposure to infectious tuberculosis. The deficient practice posed a potential TB exposure risk to residents.
    Approved
  • Residency and Residency Agreements R9-10-807.A.1-2
    Based on record review and interview, for one of six sampled residents, the manager failed to ensure a resident provided a complete baseline screening for infectious tuberculosis (TB) before or within seven calendar days after the resident's date of occupancy. The deficient practice posed a TB exposure risk to residents.
    Approved
  • Residency and Residency Agreements R9-10-807.B.1.a-b
    Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure, before or at the time of acceptance, an individual submitted documentation, dated within 90 calendars days before acceptance, which stated whether the individual required continuous medical services, continuous or intermittent nursing services, or restraints, and was dated and signed by a physician, registered nurse practitioner, registered nurse, or physician assistant, for one of six sampled residents. The deficient practice posed a risk if the facility was unable to meet a resident's needs.
    Approved
  • Service Plans R9-10-808.A.5.a-d
    Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a resident had a service plan that, when initially developed and when updated, was signed and dated by the resident or the resident’s representative, the manager, and the nurse or medical practitioner who reviewed the service plan, for one of six resident records reviewed.
    Approved
  • Service Plans R9-10-808.C.1.g
    Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a caregiver or an assistant caregiver documented the services provided in a resident's medical record, for five of six sampled residents. The deficient practice posed a risk as services could not be verified as provided against a service plan.
    Approved
  • Medication Services R9-10-817.B.3.b
    Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a medications were administered to a resident in compliance with a medication order, for two of six sampled residents. The deficient practice posed a risk if the resident experienced a change in condition due to improper administration of medication.
    Approved
  • Emergency and Safety Standards R9-10-819.A.5.a
    Based on documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure an evacuation drill for employees and residents was conducted at least once every six months. The deficient practice posed a risk if employees were unable to implement the evacuation plan.
    Approved

March 9, 2026: complaint inspection, 3 deficiencies

  • Emergency responders; patient information; hospitals; discharge planning; patient screenings; discharge document A.R.S. § 36-420.04.A.1-9
    Based on documentation review and interview, the assisted living center failed to provide an emergency responder a written document which included a copy of the resident's health insurance portability and accountability act release authorizing a receiving hospital to communicate with the assisted living center or assisted living home to plan for the resident's discharge, for two of two sampled residents. The deficient practice posed a risk if the facility was not prepared in case of an emergency.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: May 4, 2026
  • Administration R9-10-803.A.10
    Based on record review, documentation review, and interview, the governing authority failed to ensure the health, safety, or welfare of a resident was not placed at risk of harm. The deficient practice posed a risk to the physical health and safety of a resident.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: May 4, 2026
  • Service Plans R9-10-808.C.1.g
    Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a caregiver documented the services provided in a resident's medical record, for one of two sampled residents. The deficient practice posed a risk as services could not be verified as provided against a service plan.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: May 4, 2026

December 11, 2025: complaint inspection, 4 deficiencies

  • Emergency responders; patient information; hospitals; discharge planning; patient screenings; discharge document A.R.S. § 36-420.04.A.1-9
    Based on documentation review and interview, when the assisted living center contacted an emergency responder on behalf of a resident, the assisted living center failed to provide a written document which included whether the resident received medication services, basic information about the resident's physical and mental conditions and basic medical history, or a copy of the resident's health insurance portability and accountability act release authorizing a receiving hospital to communicate with the assisted living center or assisted living home to plan for the resident's discharge.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: March 11, 2026
  • Personnel R9-10-806.A.4.a-b
    Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure, for one of three sampled caregivers, a caregivers skills and knowledge were verified and documented before the caregiver provided physical health services.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: December 15, 2025
  • Service Plans R9-10-808.A.4.b.ii
    Based on record review and interview, for one of four sampled personal care residents, the manager failed to ensure a service plan was updated at least once very six months for a resident receiving personal care services.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: March 11, 2026
  • Emergency and Safety Standards R9-10-819.D.2.a-f
    Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure incident reports accurately documented the date and time of and accident, emergency, or injury, the description of an accident, emergency, or injury, the actions taken by the caregiver, the individuals notified by the caregiver, or any actions taken to prevent the accident, emergency, or injury from occurring in the future. The deficient practice posed a potential risk of re-injury if a resident did not receive adequate follow-up care.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: March 11, 2026

Inspections with no deficiencies listed

  • July 1, 2026: complaint inspection. No deficiencies were found during the on-site investigation of complaint 00175530 conducted on July 1, 2026.
  • June 27, 2025: complaint inspection. No deficiencies were found during the on-site investigation of complaint 00125365 conducted on June 27, 2025.

Read the full record on AZ Care Check →

ADHS writes a Statement of Deficiencies after each inspection that finds a rule was not met. The community then files a plan of correction, which ADHS accepts or rejects. ADHS investigates complaints on site. A complaint inspection that ends with “No deficiencies were found” did not find a rule violation; deficiencies cited on a complaint inspection are listed with that inspection. AZ Care Check does not list complaints that did not lead to an on-site inspection. Enforcement cases are actions ADHS takes after an inspection, such as a civil money penalty, a provisional license or a license revocation, with their status. This community is licensed for 96 residents; larger communities are inspected and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Arizona Department of Health Services, Licensing Services, AZ Care Check, data as of October 15, 2026, showing all records on AZ Care Check (back to September 5, 2023). Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.

License and ownershipActive license
License type
Assisted Living Center-Directed
License number
AL3061C
License status
Active
Licensed capacity
96
Administrator
Brian Balliet

Source: Arizona state licensing records (agency listing), retrieved 2026-09-09. Licensing status is a matter of public record; it is not a quality rating.

Administrator name from public records we reviewed, as of Oct 12, 2026.

Paying with Medicaid and other programsHow Medicaid pays for care in Arizona, and other programs

How Medicaid pays for care in Arizona

  • Arizona Long Term Care System (ALTCS). Yes. Arizona's Medicaid long-term care program, ALTCS, is for people who need nursing facility level of care. Members do not have to live in a nursing home, and many live in an assisted living facility and get needed services there. (state page)

Ask the community whether it accepts Medicaid.

Location and nearby careNearest hospital 0.3 mi, nursing home 0.2 mi, pharmacy 0.1 mi
Nearest hospital with an emergency room
Tucson Medical Center, Tucson. 0.3 miles away, straight line. CMS overall hospital rating: 2 of 5 stars.
Nearest Medicare nursing home
Handmaker Home for the Aging, Tucson. 0.2 miles away, straight line.
Nearest home health agency office
Nsi Nursing Service, Inc., Tucson. 0.4 miles away, straight line. Agencies travel to clients, so ask which ones serve this address.
Nearest pharmacy
CVS Pharmacy. 0.1 miles away, straight line. From OpenStreetMap, which does not list every pharmacy, so one may be closer.
Area
USDA classes ZIP code 85712 as metropolitan (metropolitan core).
Dialysis within 15 miles
Davita Swan Dialysis, Tucson, 0.6 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 4 of 5 stars)
032643 East Tucson (Fmc), Tucson, 1.4 miles away, straight line (has a shift starting after 5 pm; CMS rating 3 of 5 stars)
Davita Tucson East Dialysis, Tucson, 2.5 miles away, straight line (has a shift starting after 5 pm; CMS rating 3 of 5 stars)
Hospice
34 Medicare hospices tell CMS they serve ZIP code 85712.
Grace Hospice And Palliative Care LLC, office in Tucson, 0.6 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 2 of 5 stars)
T M C Hospice Aka Peppi'S House, office in Tucson, 0.6 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 5 of 5 stars)
Arista Hospice, office in Tucson, 0.6 miles away, straight line
Nearest geriatric medicine practice
Banner-University Medical Group, Tucson. 2.1 miles away, straight line. 2 geriatric medicine doctors listed there.

Distances are straight lines from the community, not driving distance. Hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors come from CMS provider data (CMS, hospital list updated Jul 22, 2026). Star ratings are CMS’s own.

Emergency and natural hazard riskFEMA overall risk relatively high; outside FEMA's high-risk flood areas

Public hazard maps for this location. Ask the community about its emergency plan, its generator and where residents would go in an evacuation.

Flood zone
Outside the high and moderate risk flood areas on FEMA's flood map (Zone X, minimal flood hazard, or not studied). (FEMA flood map)
FEMA National Risk Index
Overall: relatively high. By hazard: hurricane very low, inland flooding very high, wildfire very low, tornado very low, heat wave very high, earthquake relatively low. These are FEMA’s ratings for the census tract, compared with tracts nationwide. (FEMA, December 2025)

A flood zone describes the map at this point, not the building's elevation. In an emergency, follow the local emergency management agency.

Questions to ask on a tour10 questions picked for this community from its record

Picked for this community from its record. Ask them in person and write down the answers.

  1. The state recorded a finding in September 2026. What was it, and how was it fixed?
  2. What does the base rate include, and when did rates last go up?
  3. How many caregivers are on duty during the day and at night?
  4. What happens if care needs increase? When would someone need to move?
  5. What fees are charged at move-in?
  6. How do you tell families about falls, illness or changes?
  7. How long have the executive director and the head of care been here?
  8. Who gives medications, and what training do they have?
  9. For what reasons can a resident be asked to leave?
  10. Is the apartment held during a hospital stay, and at what cost?
What we checked12 public sources we searched, with dates

Every public source we searched for this community. “Nothing on record” means we found no record that matched it. A record can be missed when a name or address differs.

SourceData as ofWhat we found
Arizona Department of Health Services, Licensing Services inspection recordsOct 15, 2026See above
U.S. Department of Labor wage and hour casesOct 15, 2026Nothing on record
OSHA workplace safety inspections since 2016Oct 15, 2026Nothing on record
FEMA flood mapSee above
USDA wildfire riskApr 15, 2026Not shown: FEMA rates wildfire risk here very low
FEMA National Risk IndexSee above
CMS hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors; OpenStreetMap pharmaciesSee above
HUD Multifamily Properties - AssistedJul 6, 2026Nothing on record
State Veterans Homes (NASVH directory)Sep 20, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Hospice - General InformationAug 19, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Home Health Care AgenciesMay 27, 2026Nothing on record
The community’s own websiteNo plain statements of services found
Common questionsAnswers to 4 questions families ask
What type of care does The Rubin Community for Senior Living provide?

The Rubin Community for Senior Living is licensed by the state of Arizona for assisted living in Tucson, Arizona. Its licensed capacity is 96 residents.

Does Lilisity rate The Rubin Community for Senior Living?

No. We publish state licensing details for The Rubin Community for Senior Living but no score, rating, or ranking. Only communities on the Top Communities list or with a Senior Living Alliance Excellence Award, both based on phone-verified resident and family interviews, are ranked.

How much does The Rubin Community for Senior Living cost?

Assisted Living in Arizona typically starts at $3,450 to $5,250 a month. Based on 88 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price. The Rubin Community for Senior Living does not publish its prices.

How do I contact The Rubin Community for Senior Living?

Use The Rubin Community for Senior Living's website, handmaker.org, or visit at 2221 North Rosemont Boulevard, Tucson, AZ 85712.

Choosing assisted livingOur care guide: what to look for, what it costs, how families pay, and more questions to ask (PDF)

Report a wrong fact

How Lilisity works. The only scores or rankings Lilisity publishes are the Top Communities list and the Excellence Awards, both built from phone-verified resident and family interviews. Communities can pay Lilisity a flat monthly fee to manage their own listing: photos, prices, contact details, and receiving the inquiries families choose to send them. The fee is the same no matter how many families contact them or move in. Senior Living Alliance, which runs Lilisity, offers the same listing to its member communities as part of their membership; members pay SLA for its resident and family interview program. No community pays Lilisity per inquiry, per referral or per move-in. Payment never changes a testimonial, a rating, or the order of search results. The "Nearby Senior Living Alliance communities" box shows member communities only. How we verify testimonials · How we are paid