Assisted Living
Mountain View Retirement Village
7900 North la Canada Drive, Tucson, AZ 85704 · Map
Licensed for 99 residents
Mountain View Retirement Village is a state-licensed assisted living community in Tucson, Arizona. It is licensed for 99 residents. Lilisity publishes no score or ranking for this community; the details below come from the state licensing record.
Prices
This community does not publish its prices.
Area costs
Care and services
From the community’s website
What Mountain View Retirement Village says about itself, quoted from its own site. We have not checked these claims against licensing records. Ask about each one on a tour.
- Offers respite or short-term stays.
Respite Care
(page, checked Oct 12, 2026) - Provides transportation.
Scheduled transportation
(page, checked Oct 12, 2026) - Pets allowed.
Pet-Friendly Spaces
(page, checked Oct 15, 2026) - Apartment types named: studio, two-bedroom.
Studios, one & two-bedroom apartments
(page, checked Oct 12, 2026)
Lilisity’s independent report
What the public record shows
Gathered by Lilisity from state and federal sources. Communities can’t edit this part of the page.
State inspections
Last inspection: Aug 17, 2026. See the record
License
Active, 99 residents
Assisted Living Center-Directed AL9760C.
Nearest emergency room
2.9 miles
Northwest Medical Center, rated 2 of 5 stars by CMS.
Side by side with nearby communities
The 4 nearest communities that offer assisted living, by straight-line distance. Prices are starting prices each community publishes; we never show estimates.
| Community | Distance | Licensed capacity | Published starting price | License | Inspection citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mountain View Retirement Village this community | 99 | Not published | Active | 25 deficiencies, 4 enforcement cases | |
| La Paz Assisted Living III | 0.3 mi | 8 | Not published | Active | 13 deficiencies, 2 enforcement cases |
| Casas Chapala | 0.5 mi | 10 | Not published | Active | No record |
| Emerine Hills Adult Care Home | 0.5 mi | 10 | Not published | Active | 3 deficiencies, 0 enforcement cases |
| Casas Adobes Assisted Living | 0.7 mi | 10 | Not published | Active | 9 deficiencies, 2 enforcement cases |
State inspection record25 deficiencies, 4 enforcement cases
- Last inspection
- August 17, 2026
- Inspections
- 7, 25 deficiencies cited
- Complaint inspections
- 6, 5 with deficiencies cited
- Enforcement cases
- 4, $2,250 in civil penalties
- License active since 2015
Enforcement cases
- August 12, 2026: Civil Penalty $1,000 (complete); Notice of Enforcement Action (complete) case closed (complete)
- June 30, 2025: Civil Penalty $500 (complete) case closed (complete)
- March 25, 2024: Civil Penalty $250 (complete) case closed (complete)
- February 26, 2024: Civil Penalty $500 (complete) case closed (complete)
August 17, 2026: complaint inspection, 3 deficiencies
- Health care institutions; fall prevention and fall recovery; training programs; definition A.R.S. § 36-420.01.A
Based record review, documentation review, and interview, for five of seven employees sampled, the health care institution failed to develop and administer a fall prevention and fall recovery training program, which included initial training and continued competency training, for all staff.
Approved - Administration R9-10-803.J.1-6
Based on interview, and document review, after the manager had a reasonable basis, under A.R.S. § 46-454, to believe abuse, neglect, or exploitation had occurred on the premises, the manager failed to immediately report, investigate, or document the abuse, neglect, or exploitation as required per R9-10-803(J). The deficient practice posed a risk as the Department was unable to assess if there was an immediate health and safety concern for residents who resided in the assisted living facility.
Approved - Service Plans R9-10-808.A.1-5
Based on record review and interview, for three of eight residents sampled, the manager failed to ensure a service plan was established, documented, and implemented, which included the amount, type, and frequency of assisted living and ancillary services provided to the resident. The deficient practice posed a risk if the employees were unable to meet a resident's needs.
Approved
June 11, 2026: complaint, compliance (annual) inspection, 11 deficiencies
- Health care institutions; fall prevention and fall recovery; training programs; definition A.R.S. § 36-420.01.A
Based on record review and interview, the health care institution failed to ensure a training program for all staff regarding fall prevention and fall recovery, which included initial training and continued competency, was developed and implemented.
Plan of correction rejected; correction date given by the community: September 1, 2026 - Modification of a Health Care Institution R9-10-110.A.1-5
Based on observation, interview, and documentation review, the licensee failed to submit a request for approval of a modification of a health care institution when planning to make changes to physical plant requirements, described in R9-10-820(D)(4)(d).
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: August 6, 2026 - Tuberculosis Screening R9-10-113.A.2.a-f
Based on record review, document review, and interview, for four of twelve employees sampled, the chief administrative officer failed to implement tuberculosis (TB) infection control activities, which included assessing risks of prior exposure to infectious TB, determining if the individual had signs or symptoms of TB, obtaining documentation of the individual’s freedom from infectious TB, and annual training on the signs and symptoms of TB. The deficient practice posed a potential TB exposure risk to residents.
Plan of correction submitted; correction date given by the community: August 17, 2026 - Personnel R9-10-806.C.1.a-c
Based on observation, document review, record review, and interview, for two of the seven sampled caregivers and assistant caregivers, the manager failed to ensure that a caregiver's or assistant caregiver's skills and knowledge were verified and documented and orientation was completed before providing physical or behavioral health services.
Plan of correction submitted; correction date given by the community: August 14, 2026 - Resident Rights R9-10-810.B.1
Based on documentation review, and interview the manager failed to ensure a resident is treated with dignity, respect, and consideration. The deficient practice posed a risk of injury and violated a resident's rights.
Plan of correction rejected; correction date given by the community: August 6, 2026
Show all 9
- Environmental Standards R9-10-820.A.11
Based on observation and interview, the manager failed to ensure poisonous or toxic materials stored by the assisted living facility were maintained in labeled containers in a locked area separate from food preparation and storage, dining areas, and medications, and were inaccessible to residents. The deficient practice posed a risk to the physical health and safety of a resident.
Plan of correction submitted; correction date given by the community: June 11, 2026 - Environmental Standards R9-10-820.A.13.a-c
Based on observation and interview, the manager failed to ensure equipment at the facility was maintained in working order. The deficient practice posed a risk to the health and safety of residents. The deficient practice violated the resident's rights to consideration.
Plan of correction rejected; correction date given by the community: June 11, 2026 - Physical Plant Standards R9-10-821.B.5.a-c
Based on observation and interview, the manager failed to ensure an outside activity space was provided and had an available shaded area.
Plan of correction submitted; correction date given by the community: August 3, 2026 - and 3 more in the report
May 8, 2025: complaint, compliance (annual) inspection, 9 deficiencies
- Modification of a Health Care Institution R9-10-110.A.1-5
Based on observation, interview, and documentation review, the licensee failed to submit a request for approval of a modification of a health care institution when planning to make changes to physical plant requirements, described in R9-10-820(D)(4)(d).
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: April 30, 2026 - Personnel R9-10-806.A.8.a-b
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure an employee provided documentation of freedom from infectious tuberculosis (TB) on or before the date the individual began providing services at or on behalf of the assisted living facility, as specified in R9-10-113, for three of nine employees sampled. The deficient practice posed a potential TB exposure risk to residents.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: August 31, 2025 - Residency and Residency Agreements R9-10-807.A.1-2
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a resident provided evidence of freedom from infectious tuberculosis (TB) within seven calendar days after the resident’s date of occupancy for three of ten residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a potential TB exposure risk to residents.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: May 9, 2025 - Service Plans R9-10-808.A.3.c
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a resident had a written service plan that included the level of service the resident is expected to receive, or included the amount, type, and frequency of assisted living services being provided, for four of ten residents sampled.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: May 22, 2025 - Resident Rights R9-10-810.B.1
Based on observation and interview, the manager failed to ensure a resident was treated with dignity, respect, and consideration.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: September 30, 2025
Show all 9
- Medication Services R9-10-816.F.1
Based on observation and interview, the manager failed to ensure medication was stored in a separate locked room, closet, cabinet, or self-contained unit used only for medication storage.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: September 30, 2025 - Emergency and Safety Standards R9-10-818.A.4
Based on documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a disaster drill for employees was conducted on each shift, at least once every three months, and documented.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: May 9, 2025 - Emergency and Safety Standards R9-10-818.A.5.a
Based on document review and interview, the manager failed to ensure an evacuation drill was conducted at least every six months.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: July 11, 2025 - and 1 more in the report
January 30, 2024: complaint inspection, 1 deficiency
- Personnel R9-10-806.A.4.a-b
Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, for four of six caregivers reviewed, the manager failed to ensure a caregiver's skills and knowledge were verified and documented before providing physical health services, and according to policies and procedures. The deficient practice posed a risk if employees were unable to meet the needs of residents.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: January 31, 2024
Inspections with no deficiencies listed
- August 17, 2026: monitoring inspection. No deficiencies were found during the on-site monitoring inspection conducted on August 17, 2026.
- September 15, 2025: complaint inspection. No deficiencies were found during the on-site investigation of complaints 00144114, 00131800, and 00133630, conducted on September 15, 2025:
Read the full record on AZ Care Check →
ADHS writes a Statement of Deficiencies after each inspection that finds a rule was not met. The community then files a plan of correction, which ADHS accepts or rejects. ADHS investigates complaints on site. A complaint inspection that ends with “No deficiencies were found” did not find a rule violation; deficiencies cited on a complaint inspection are listed with that inspection. AZ Care Check does not list complaints that did not lead to an on-site inspection. Enforcement cases are actions ADHS takes after an inspection, such as a civil money penalty, a provisional license or a license revocation, with their status. This community is licensed for 99 residents; larger communities are inspected and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Arizona Department of Health Services, Licensing Services, AZ Care Check, data as of October 15, 2026, showing all records on AZ Care Check (back to September 5, 2023). Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.
License and ownershipActive license
- License type
- Assisted Living Center-Directed
- License number
- AL9760C
- License status
- Active
- Licensed capacity
- 99
- County
- Pima County
Source: Arizona state licensing records (agency listing), retrieved 2026-09-09. Licensing status is a matter of public record; it is not a quality rating.
Paying with Medicaid and other programsHow Medicaid pays for care in Arizona, and other programs
How Medicaid pays for care in Arizona
- Arizona Long Term Care System (ALTCS). Yes. Arizona's Medicaid long-term care program, ALTCS, is for people who need nursing facility level of care. Members do not have to live in a nursing home, and many live in an assisted living facility and get needed services there. (state page)
Ask the community whether it accepts Medicaid.
Location and nearby careNearest hospital 2.9 mi, nursing home 0.3 mi, pharmacy 1.1 mi
- Nearest hospital with an emergency room
- Northwest Medical Center, Tucson. 2.9 miles away, straight line. CMS overall hospital rating: 2 of 5 stars. Location approximate.
- Nearest Medicare nursing home
- La Canada Care Center, Tucson. 0.3 miles away, straight line.
- Nearest home health agency office
- Home Care For The 21St Century North Tucson, Tucson. 1.1 miles away, straight line. Agencies travel to clients, so ask which ones serve this address.
- Nearest pharmacy
- Walmart Pharmacy. 1.1 miles away, straight line. From OpenStreetMap, which does not list every pharmacy, so one may be closer.
- Area
- USDA classes ZIP code 85704 as metropolitan (metropolitan core).
- Dialysis within 15 miles
- Davita Northwest Tucson Dialysis, Tucson, 2.2 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 3 of 5 stars)
032613 Northwest Tucson Dialysis (Fmc), Tucson, 2.2 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 3 of 5 stars)
Davita Oro Valley Dialysis, Oro Valley, 5.6 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 2 of 5 stars) - Hospice
- 36 Medicare hospices tell CMS they serve ZIP code 85704.
Casa De La Luz Hospice, office in Tucson, 1.2 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 3 of 5 stars)
Bayada Hospice, office in Tucson, 1.7 miles away, straight line
Aria Hospice Comfort Care, office in Tucson, 1.7 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 5 of 5 stars) - Nearest geriatric medicine practice
- Banner-University Medical Group, Tucson. 5.8 miles away, straight line. 1 geriatric medicine doctor listed there.
Distances are straight lines from the community, not driving distance. Hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors come from CMS provider data (CMS, hospital list updated Jul 22, 2026). Star ratings are CMS’s own.
Emergency and natural hazard riskFEMA overall risk relatively moderate; outside FEMA's high-risk flood areas
Public hazard maps for this location. Ask the community about its emergency plan, its generator and where residents would go in an evacuation.
- Flood zone
- Outside the high and moderate risk flood areas on FEMA's flood map (Zone X, minimal flood hazard, or not studied). (FEMA flood map)
- FEMA National Risk Index
- Overall: relatively moderate. By hazard: hurricane very low, inland flooding relatively high, wildfire very low, tornado very low, heat wave very high, earthquake relatively low. These are FEMA’s ratings for the census tract, compared with tracts nationwide. (FEMA, December 2025)
A flood zone describes the map at this point, not the building's elevation. In an emergency, follow the local emergency management agency.
Questions to ask on a tour10 questions picked for this community from its record
Picked for this community from its record. Ask them in person and write down the answers.
- The state recorded a finding in August 2026. What was it, and how was it fixed?
- What does the base rate include, and when did rates last go up?
- How many caregivers are on duty during the day and at night?
- What happens if care needs increase? When would someone need to move?
- What fees are charged at move-in?
- How do you tell families about falls, illness or changes?
- How long have the executive director and the head of care been here?
- Who gives medications, and what training do they have?
- For what reasons can a resident be asked to leave?
- Is the apartment held during a hospital stay, and at what cost?
What we checked12 public sources we searched, with dates
Every public source we searched for this community. “Nothing on record” means we found no record that matched it. A record can be missed when a name or address differs.
| Source | Data as of | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Arizona Department of Health Services, Licensing Services inspection records | Oct 15, 2026 | See above |
| U.S. Department of Labor wage and hour cases | Oct 15, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| OSHA workplace safety inspections since 2016 | Oct 15, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| FEMA flood map | See above | |
| USDA wildfire risk | Apr 15, 2026 | Not shown: FEMA rates wildfire risk here very low |
| FEMA National Risk Index | See above | |
| CMS hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors; OpenStreetMap pharmacies | See above | |
| HUD Multifamily Properties - Assisted | Jul 6, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| State Veterans Homes (NASVH directory) | Sep 20, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| CMS Hospice - General Information | Aug 19, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| CMS Home Health Care Agencies | May 27, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| The community’s own website | See above |
Common questionsAnswers to 4 questions families ask
What type of care does Mountain View Retirement Village provide?
Mountain View Retirement Village is licensed by the state of Arizona for assisted living in Tucson, Arizona. Its licensed capacity is 99 residents.
Does Lilisity rate Mountain View Retirement Village?
No. We publish state licensing details for Mountain View Retirement Village but no score, rating, or ranking. Only communities on the Top Communities list or with a Senior Living Alliance Excellence Award, both based on phone-verified resident and family interviews, are ranked.
How much does Mountain View Retirement Village cost?
Assisted Living in Arizona typically starts at $3,450 to $5,250 a month. Based on 88 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price. Mountain View Retirement Village does not publish its prices.
How do I contact Mountain View Retirement Village?
Use Mountain View Retirement Village's website, mountainviewretirement.com, or visit at 7900 North la Canada Drive, Tucson, AZ 85704.
How Lilisity works. The only scores or rankings Lilisity publishes are the Top Communities list and the Excellence Awards, both built from phone-verified resident and family interviews. Communities can pay Lilisity a flat monthly fee to manage their own listing: photos, prices, contact details, and receiving the inquiries families choose to send them. The fee is the same no matter how many families contact them or move in. Senior Living Alliance, which runs Lilisity, offers the same listing to its member communities as part of their membership; members pay SLA for its resident and family interview program. No community pays Lilisity per inquiry, per referral or per move-in. Payment never changes a testimonial, a rating, or the order of search results. The "Nearby Senior Living Alliance communities" box shows member communities only. How we verify testimonials · How we are paid