Assisted Living
Marshall Home for Men
3314 South 16th Avenue, Tucson, AZ 85713 · Map
Licensed for 52 residents
Marshall Home for Men is a state-licensed assisted living community in Tucson, Arizona. It is licensed for 52 residents. Lilisity publishes no score or ranking for this community; the details below come from the state licensing record.
Prices
This community does not publish its prices.
Area costs
Care and services
From the community’s website
What Marshall Home for Men says about itself, quoted from its own site. We have not checked these claims against licensing records. Ask about each one on a tour.
Lilisity’s independent report
What the public record shows
Gathered by Lilisity from state and federal sources. Communities can’t edit this part of the page.
State inspections
Last inspection: Jul 9, 2026. See the record
License
Active, 52 residents
Assisted Living Center-Personal AL0057C.
Nearest emergency room
3.0 miles
Banner-University Medical Center South Campus, rated 4 of 5 stars by CMS.
Side by side with nearby communities
The 4 nearest communities that offer assisted living, by straight-line distance. Prices are starting prices each community publishes; we never show estimates.
| Community | Distance | Licensed capacity | Published starting price | License | Inspection citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marshall Home for Men this community | 52 | Not published | Active | 17 deficiencies, 1 enforcement case | |
| Care Haven #1 Trejo | 1.0 mi | 10 | Not published | Active | 4 deficiencies, 1 enforcement case |
| A Breath of Life Care Home | 1.2 mi | 5 | Not published | Active | 3 deficiencies, 1 enforcement case |
| Caring Hearts Assisted Living Home | 1.2 mi | 8 | Not published | Active | 21 deficiencies, 2 enforcement cases |
| Manantial de Vida | 1.3 mi | 10 | Not published | Active | 5 deficiencies, 0 enforcement cases |
State inspection record17 deficiencies, 1 enforcement case
- Last inspection
- July 9, 2026
- Inspections
- 5, 17 deficiencies cited
- Complaint inspections
- 4, 3 with deficiencies cited
- Enforcement cases
- 1, $500 in civil penalties
- License active since 1990
Enforcement cases
- April 15, 2025: Civil Penalty $500 (complete) case closed (complete)
July 9, 2026: complaint inspection, 1 deficiency
- Administration R9-10-803.C.1.m
Based on documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure policies and procedures were established and documented to protect the health and safety of a resident to cover methods by which the assisted living facility was aware of the general or specific whereabouts of a resident, based on the level of assisted living services provided to the resident and the assisted living services the assisted living facility was authorized to provide.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: July 15, 2026
March 10, 2026: complaint, compliance (annual) inspection, 2 deficiencies
- Health care institutions; fall prevention and fall recovery; training programs; definition A.R.S. § 36-420.01.A
Based on documentation review and interview, the health care institution failed to ensure the health care institution administered a training program for all staff regarding fall prevention and fall recovery that included initial training and continued competency training for one of two personnel sampled. The deficient practice posed a health and safety risk for residents.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: March 12, 2026 - Personnel R9-10-806.C.1.a-c
Based on record review, documentation review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a personnel record for each employee included documentation of the individual’s completed orientation and in-service education required by policies and procedures for one of two personnel sampled.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: March 12, 2026
March 14, 2025: complaint inspection, 7 deficiencies
- Administration R9-10-803.J.1-6
Based on document review, record review, and interview, after the manager had a reasonable basis, according to A.R.S. § 46-454, to believe abuse, neglect, or exploitation had occurred on the premises or while the resident is receiving services from the assisted living facility, the manager failed to report the suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of the resident according to A.R.S. § 46-454, and failed to initiate an investigation and document findings within five working days.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: March 17, 2025 - Service Plans R9-10-808.A.3.e.i.1-4
Based on record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a resident's written service plan included the psychosocial interactions or behaviors for which the resident required assistance; the psychotropic medications ordered for the resident; the planned strategies and actions for changing the resident's psychosocial interactions or behaviors; and the goals for changes in the resident's psychosocial interactions or behaviors, for one of one resident reviewed who required behavioral care.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: March 17, 2025 - Service Plans R9-10-808.A.3.e.ii
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a service plan, for a resident who required behavioral care, was reviewed by a medical practitioner or behavioral health professional, for one of one resident sampled who required behavioral care.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: March 17, 2025 - Service Plans R9-10-808.A.4.a
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a resident's written service plan was reviewed and updated no later than 14 calendar days after a significant change in the resident's physical, cognitive, or functional condition, for one of one resident sampled.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: March 17, 2025 - Emergency and Safety Standards R9-10-818.D.1
Based on documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a caregiver or an assistant caregiver documented the immediate notification of a resident's emergency contact and primary care provider when a resident had an accident, emergency or injury and needed medical services.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: March 17, 2025 - Emergency and Safety Standards R9-10-818.D.2.a-f
Based on documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a caregiver or an assistant caregiver documented an event in which a resident had an accident, emergency or injury and needed medical services, as required per R9-10-818.D.2.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: March 17, 2025 - Emergency responders; patient information; hospitals; discharge planning; patient screenings; discharge document A.R.S. § 36-420.04.D
Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the assisted living center failed to maintain a copy of the documentation provided to an emergency responder, for one of one resident sampled for whom an emergency responder had been contacted.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: March 17, 2025
October 2, 2024: compliance (annual) inspection, 7 deficiencies
- Administration R9-10-803.C.1.r
Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to implement a policy and procedure to protect the health and safety of a resident covering assistance in the self-administration of medication and medication administration.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: October 24, 2024 - Residency and Residency Agreements R9-10-807.B.1.a-b
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure before or at the time of acceptance of an individual, the individual submitted documentation dated within 90 calendar days before the individual was accepted by the assisted living facility and included whether the individual required continuous medical services, continuous or intermittent nursing services, or restraints, and was dated and signed by a physician, registered nurse practitioner, registered nurse, or physician assistant for one of three residents sampled.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: October 24, 2024 - Service Plans R9-10-808.C.1.g
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a caregiver documented the services provided in the resident's medical record, for three of three residents sampled.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: October 24, 2024 - R9-10-816.B.3.b R9-10-816.B.3.b
Based on record review, observation, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a medication administered to a resident was administered in compliance with a medication order, for three of three residents sampled.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: October 24, 2024 - R9-10-816.H.1 R9-10-816.H.1
Based on observation, record review, documentation review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure medication stored in a resident's room was stored according to the resident's service plan, for one of three residents sampled who received personal care.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: October 24, 2024 - R9-10-817.C.6 R9-10-817.C.6
Based on observation and interview, the manager failed to ensure that frozen foods were stored at a temperature of 0° F or below.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: October 24, 2024 - Opioid Prescribing and Treatment R9-10-120.F.4.c.i-ii
Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure an individual who administered an opioid in treating a patient documented in the patient's medical record an identification of the patient's need for the opioid before the opioid was administered and the effect of the opioid administered, for one of one residents sampled who was administered an opioid.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: October 24, 2024
Inspections with no deficiencies listed
- April 24, 2026: complaint inspection. No deficiencies were found during the on-site investigation of complaint 00166929 conducted on April 24, 2026.
Read the full record on AZ Care Check →
ADHS writes a Statement of Deficiencies after each inspection that finds a rule was not met. The community then files a plan of correction, which ADHS accepts or rejects. ADHS investigates complaints on site. A complaint inspection that ends with “No deficiencies were found” did not find a rule violation; deficiencies cited on a complaint inspection are listed with that inspection. AZ Care Check does not list complaints that did not lead to an on-site inspection. Enforcement cases are actions ADHS takes after an inspection, such as a civil money penalty, a provisional license or a license revocation, with their status. This community is licensed for 52 residents; larger communities are inspected and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Arizona Department of Health Services, Licensing Services, AZ Care Check, data as of October 15, 2026, showing all records on AZ Care Check (back to September 5, 2023). Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.
License and ownershipActive license
- License type
- Assisted Living Center-Personal
- License number
- AL0057C
- License status
- Active
- Licensed capacity
- 52
- County
- Pima County
Source: Arizona state licensing records (agency listing), retrieved 2026-09-09. Licensing status is a matter of public record; it is not a quality rating.
Paying with Medicaid and other programsHow Medicaid pays for care in Arizona, and other programs
How Medicaid pays for care in Arizona
- Arizona Long Term Care System (ALTCS). Yes. Arizona's Medicaid long-term care program, ALTCS, is for people who need nursing facility level of care. Members do not have to live in a nursing home, and many live in an assisted living facility and get needed services there. (state page)
Ask the community whether it accepts Medicaid.
Staff pay and workplace safety1 federal wage case with violations found; 1 OSHA inspection, no violations cited
Federal records about how the employer here treats its staff.
Federal wage and hour cases
The Department of Labor checks that staff are paid minimum wage and overtime as the law requires.
- Findings for Feb 2, 2003 to Jan 30, 2005. Violations found: Overtime. Back wages: $461 owed to 1 employee. Employer as DOL recorded it: Marshall Home For Men, Inc. (Marshall Home For Men). Case 1392453.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Wage and Hour Division enforcement data, loaded Oct 15, 2026. Concluded cases only. The dates are the period in which DOL found violations, not when the case opened or closed. Back wages are what the employer agreed to pay; penalties are what DOL assessed. DOL does not publish a page for each case, so search the dataset by case number.
OSHA workplace safety inspections
OSHA inspects workplaces for staff safety, such as lifting, needles, chemicals and workplace violence. It does not inspect resident care.
- Feb 5, 2016: complaint inspection, partial (health). Case closed Feb 5, 2016. No violations cited. OSHA record. OSHA recorded the employer as Marshall Home for Men, INC.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor OSHA enforcement data, as of Oct 15, 2026, inspections since 2016. Penalties can change while a case is open or contested.
Location and nearby careNearest hospital 3.0 mi, nursing home 1.4 mi, pharmacy 1.2 mi
- Nearest hospital with an emergency room
- Banner-University Medical Center South Campus, Tucson. 3.0 miles away, straight line. CMS overall hospital rating: 4 of 5 stars.
- Nearest Medicare nursing home
- Arizona State Veteran Home-tucson, Tucson. 1.4 miles away, straight line.
- Nearest home health agency office
- Reliable Nurses LLC, Tucson. 3.0 miles away, straight line. Agencies travel to clients, so ask which ones serve this address.
- Nearest pharmacy
- Walgreens. 1.2 miles away, straight line. From OpenStreetMap, which does not list every pharmacy, so one may be closer.
- Area
- USDA classes ZIP code 85713 as metropolitan (metropolitan core).
- Dialysis within 15 miles
- 032629 South Tucson Dialysis (Fmc), Tucson, 0.9 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 4 of 5 stars)
032565 Desert Dialysis Center South Tucson (Dci), Tucson, 1.8 miles away, straight line (has a shift starting after 5 pm; CMS rating 2 of 5 stars)
Davita Tucson South Central Dialysis, Tucson, 2.8 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 2 of 5 stars) - Hospice
- 31 Medicare hospices tell CMS they serve ZIP code 85713.
Hospice In The Desert LLC, office in Tucson, 3.7 miles away, straight line
Prestige Health Hospice, office in Tucson, 3.9 miles away, straight line
Agape Hospice & Palliative Care, office in Tucson, 5.5 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 4 of 5 stars) - Nearest geriatric medicine practice
- Banner-University Medical Group, Tucson. 3.0 miles away, straight line. 1 geriatric medicine doctor listed there.
Distances are straight lines from the community, not driving distance. Hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors come from CMS provider data (CMS, hospital list updated Jul 22, 2026). Star ratings are CMS’s own.
Emergency and natural hazard riskFEMA overall risk relatively high; outside FEMA's high-risk flood areas
Public hazard maps for this location. Ask the community about its emergency plan, its generator and where residents would go in an evacuation.
- Flood zone
- Outside the high and moderate risk flood areas on FEMA's flood map (Zone X, minimal flood hazard, or not studied). (FEMA flood map)
- FEMA National Risk Index
- Overall: relatively high. By hazard: hurricane very low, inland flooding very high, wildfire relatively low, tornado very low, heat wave very high, earthquake relatively low. These are FEMA’s ratings for the census tract, compared with tracts nationwide. (FEMA, December 2025)
A flood zone describes the map at this point, not the building's elevation. In an emergency, follow the local emergency management agency.
Questions to ask on a tour10 questions picked for this community from its record
Picked for this community from its record. Ask them in person and write down the answers.
- The state recorded a finding in July 2026. What was it, and how was it fixed?
- What does the base rate include, and when did rates last go up?
- How many caregivers are on duty during the day and at night?
- What happens if care needs increase? When would someone need to move?
- What fees are charged at move-in?
- How do you tell families about falls, illness or changes?
- How long have the executive director and the head of care been here?
- Who gives medications, and what training do they have?
- For what reasons can a resident be asked to leave?
- Is the apartment held during a hospital stay, and at what cost?
What we checked12 public sources we searched, with dates
Every public source we searched for this community. “Nothing on record” means we found no record that matched it. A record can be missed when a name or address differs.
| Source | Data as of | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Arizona Department of Health Services, Licensing Services inspection records | Oct 15, 2026 | See above |
| U.S. Department of Labor wage and hour cases | Oct 15, 2026 | See above |
| OSHA workplace safety inspections since 2016 | Oct 15, 2026 | See above |
| FEMA flood map | See above | |
| USDA wildfire risk | Apr 15, 2026 | Not shown: FEMA rates wildfire risk here relatively low |
| FEMA National Risk Index | See above | |
| CMS hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors; OpenStreetMap pharmacies | See above | |
| HUD Multifamily Properties - Assisted | Jul 6, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| State Veterans Homes (NASVH directory) | Sep 20, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| CMS Hospice - General Information | Aug 19, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| CMS Home Health Care Agencies | May 27, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| The community’s own website | See above |
Common questionsAnswers to 4 questions families ask
What type of care does Marshall Home for Men provide?
Marshall Home for Men is licensed by the state of Arizona for assisted living in Tucson, Arizona. Its licensed capacity is 52 residents.
Does Lilisity rate Marshall Home for Men?
No. We publish state licensing details for Marshall Home for Men but no score, rating, or ranking. Only communities on the Top Communities list or with a Senior Living Alliance Excellence Award, both based on phone-verified resident and family interviews, are ranked.
How much does Marshall Home for Men cost?
Assisted Living in Arizona typically starts at $3,450 to $5,250 a month. Based on 88 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price. Marshall Home for Men does not publish its prices.
How do I contact Marshall Home for Men?
Use Marshall Home for Men's website, marshallhomeformen.org, or visit at 3314 South 16th Avenue, Tucson, AZ 85713.
How Lilisity works. The only scores or rankings Lilisity publishes are the Top Communities list and the Excellence Awards, both built from phone-verified resident and family interviews. Communities can pay Lilisity a flat monthly fee to manage their own listing: photos, prices, contact details, and receiving the inquiries families choose to send them. The fee is the same no matter how many families contact them or move in. Senior Living Alliance, which runs Lilisity, offers the same listing to its member communities as part of their membership; members pay SLA for its resident and family interview program. No community pays Lilisity per inquiry, per referral or per move-in. Payment never changes a testimonial, a rating, or the order of search results. The "Nearby Senior Living Alliance communities" box shows member communities only. How we verify testimonials · How we are paid