Assisted Living
Hartford Assisted Living
3736 West Hartford Avenue, Glendale, AZ 85308 · Map
Licensed for 10 residents
Hartford Assisted Living is a state-licensed assisted living community in Glendale, Arizona. It is licensed for 10 residents. Lilisity publishes no score or ranking for this community; the details below come from the state licensing record.
Prices
This community does not publish its prices.
Area costs
Lilisity’s independent report
What the public record shows
Gathered by Lilisity from state and federal sources. Communities can’t edit this part of the page.
State inspections
Last inspection: May 22, 2026. See the record
License
Active, 10 residents
Assisted Living Home-Directed AL11526H.
Nearest emergency room
2.1 miles
Honorhealth Deer Valley Medical Center, rated 3 of 5 stars by CMS.
Side by side with nearby communities
The 4 nearest communities that offer assisted living, by straight-line distance. Prices are starting prices each community publishes; we never show estimates.
| Community | Distance | Licensed capacity | Published starting price | License | Inspection citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hartford Assisted Living this community | 10 | Not published | Active | 13 deficiencies, 1 enforcement case | |
| Aging Gracefully | 0.4 mi | 9 | Not published | Active | 13 deficiencies, 2 enforcement cases |
| Grace Assisted Living | 0.5 mi | 10 | Not published | Active | 9 deficiencies, 2 enforcement cases |
| Grace Assisted Living II | 0.5 mi | 5 | Not published | Active | 1 deficiency, 0 enforcement cases |
| Beverly Assisted Living I | 0.6 mi | 8 | Not published | Active | 15 deficiencies, 1 enforcement case |
State inspection record13 deficiencies, 1 enforcement case
- Last inspection
- May 22, 2026
- Inspections
- 2, 13 deficiencies cited
- Complaint inspections
- 2, 2 with deficiencies cited
- Enforcement cases
- 1, $250 in civil penalties
- License active since 2020
Enforcement cases
- March 7, 2024: Civil Penalty $250 (complete) case closed (complete)
May 22, 2026: complaint, compliance (annual) inspection, 7 deficiencies
- Residency and Residency Agreements R9-10-807.A.1-2
Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a resident provided freedom from infectious tuberculosis before or within seven calendar days after the resident’s date of occupancy, and as specified in R9-19-113, for one of the two residents reviewed. The deficient practice posed a potential TB exposure risk to residents.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: May 22, 2026 - Residency and Residency Agreements R9-10-807.H.1-5
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure that the written notice of termination of residency included the date of notice, the reason for termination, the policy for refunding fees, charges, and deposits, and contact information for the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: May 22, 2026 - Service Plans R9-10-808.A.3.c
Based on record review, documentation review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a resident had a service plan established that included the amount, type, and frequency of assisted living services and ancillary services being provided to the resident for two of the two residents reviewed. The deficient practice posed a risk if a resident’s service plan did not include the services to be provided.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: May 26, 2026 - Service Plans R9-10-808.A.4.a
Based on documentation review, record review, observation, and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a resident had a service plan that was updated based on the changes in requirements in subsections (A)(3)(a) through (f) no later than 14 calendar days after a significant change in the resident’s physical, cognitive, or functional condition for one of the two residents reviewed. The deficient practice posed a risk if the resident’s service plan was not created to address the resident's most current condition.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: May 26, 2026 - Service Plans R9-10-808.C.1.g
Based on record review, documentation review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a caregiver or an assistant caregiver documented the services provided in the resident’s medical record for two of the two residents reviewed. The deficient practice posed a risk as services could not be verified as provided against a service plan.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: May 22, 2026 - Directed Care Services R9-10-815.F.2.a-c
Based on observation, department documentation review, documentation review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure there was a means of exiting a facility for a resident that provided access to a secure, outside area that allowed residents to be at least 30 feet (ft) away and monitored or alerted employees to the egress of a resident from the facility. The deficient practice posed a risk if the facility was unaware of the general or specific whereabouts of a resident.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: May 22, 2026 - Environmental Standards R9-10-820.A.11
Based on observation, documentation review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure that poisonous or toxic materials stored by the assisted living facility were maintained in labeled containers in a locked area separate from food preparation and storage, dining areas, and medications, and were inaccessible to residents. The deficient practice posed a risk to the physical health and safety of a resident.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: May 22, 2026
February 5, 2024: complaint, compliance (annual) inspection, 6 deficiencies
- Personnel R9-10-806.A.8.a-b
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure an employee provided documentation of freedom from infectious tuberculosis (TB) as specified in R9-10-113, for two of five caregivers. The deficient practice posed a potential TB exposure risk to residents.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: March 15, 2024 - Medical Records R9-10-811.C.17
Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a resident medical record contained documentation of notification of the resident of the availability of vaccination for pneumonia, according to A.R.S. § 36-406(1)(d), to one of one resident reviewed. The deficient practice posed a potential illness risk to residents.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: March 15, 2024 - R9-10-816.B.3.b R9-10-816.B.3.b
Based on record review, observation, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a medication was administered in compliance with a medication order, for one of two residents reviewed. The deficient practice posed a risk if the resident experienced a change in condition due to improper administration of medication.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: March 15, 2024 - R9-10-818.D.1 R9-10-818.D.1
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure when a resident had an incident that resulted in the resident needing medical services, a caregiver immediately notified the resident's emergency contact and primary care provider, for two of two residents reviewed who had an incident that resulted in the resident needing medical services. The deficient practice posed a health and safety risk.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: March 15, 2024 - R9-10-818.D.2.a-f R9-10-818.D.2.a-f
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure when a resident had an incident that resulted in the resident needing medical services, a caregiver documented the date and time of the incident; a description of the incident; the names of individuals who observed the incident; the action taken by the caregiver; the individuals notified by the caregiver; and any action taken to prevent the incident from occurring in the future, for one of two residents reviewed who had an incident that resulted in the resident needing medical services.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: March 15, 2024 - R9-10-819.A.11 R9-10-819.A.11
Based on observation and interview, the manager failed to ensure toxic materials stored by the facility were stored in a locked area and inaccessible to residents. The deficient practice posed a risk to the physical health and safety of a resident.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: March 15, 2024
Read the full record on AZ Care Check →
ADHS writes a Statement of Deficiencies after each inspection that finds a rule was not met. The community then files a plan of correction, which ADHS accepts or rejects. ADHS investigates complaints on site. A complaint inspection that ends with “No deficiencies were found” did not find a rule violation; deficiencies cited on a complaint inspection are listed with that inspection. AZ Care Check does not list complaints that did not lead to an on-site inspection. Enforcement cases are actions ADHS takes after an inspection, such as a civil money penalty, a provisional license or a license revocation, with their status. This community is licensed for 10 residents; larger communities are inspected and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Arizona Department of Health Services, Licensing Services, AZ Care Check, data as of October 15, 2026, showing all records on AZ Care Check (back to September 5, 2023). Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.
License and ownershipActive license
- License type
- Assisted Living Home-Directed
- License number
- AL11526H
- License status
- Active
- Licensed capacity
- 10
- County
- Maricopa County
Source: Arizona state licensing records (agency listing), retrieved 2026-09-09. Licensing status is a matter of public record; it is not a quality rating.
Paying with Medicaid and other programsHow Medicaid pays for care in Arizona, and other programs
How Medicaid pays for care in Arizona
- Arizona Long Term Care System (ALTCS). Yes. Arizona's Medicaid long-term care program, ALTCS, is for people who need nursing facility level of care. Members do not have to live in a nursing home, and many live in an assisted living facility and get needed services there. (state page)
Ask the community whether it accepts Medicaid.
Location and nearby careNearest hospital 2.1 mi, nursing home 3.3 mi, pharmacy 0.9 mi
- Nearest hospital with an emergency room
- Honorhealth Deer Valley Medical Center, Phoenix. 2.1 miles away, straight line. CMS overall hospital rating: 3 of 5 stars.
- Nearest Medicare nursing home
- Life Care Center of North Glendale, Glendale. 3.3 miles away, straight line.
- Nearest home health agency office
- Enhabit Home Health, Glendale. 2.4 miles away, straight line. Agencies travel to clients, so ask which ones serve this address.
- Nearest pharmacy
- Walgreens. 0.9 miles away, straight line. From OpenStreetMap, which does not list every pharmacy, so one may be closer.
- Area
- USDA classes ZIP code 85308 as metropolitan (metropolitan core).
- Dialysis within 15 miles
- 032647-Fmc North Mountain, Phoenix, 1.3 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 3 of 5 stars)
Davita Arrowhead Lakes Dialysis Center, Glendale, 2.6 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 3 of 5 stars)
032587 Deer Valley Dialysis (Fmc), Phoenix, 3.1 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 3 of 5 stars) - Hospice
- 88 Medicare hospices tell CMS they serve ZIP code 85308.
Solace Hospice, LLC, office in Phoenix, 0.9 miles away, straight line
Bliss Hospice LLC, office in Phoenix, 1.8 miles away, straight line
Passion Hospice, office in Phoenix, 1.8 miles away, straight line - Nearest geriatric medicine practice
- Neighborhood Outreach Access To Health, Phoenix. 2.4 miles away, straight line. 1 geriatric medicine doctor listed there.
Distances are straight lines from the community, not driving distance. Hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors come from CMS provider data (CMS, hospital list updated Jul 22, 2026). Star ratings are CMS’s own.
Emergency and natural hazard riskFEMA overall risk relatively low; outside FEMA's high-risk flood areas
Public hazard maps for this location. Ask the community about its emergency plan, its generator and where residents would go in an evacuation.
- Flood zone
- Zone X: 0.2% annual chance (500-year) flood area (moderate risk). (FEMA flood map)
- FEMA National Risk Index
- Overall: relatively low. By hazard: hurricane very low, inland flooding relatively low, tornado very low, heat wave very high, earthquake very low. These are FEMA’s ratings for the census tract, compared with tracts nationwide. (FEMA, December 2025)
A flood zone describes the map at this point, not the building's elevation. In an emergency, follow the local emergency management agency.
Questions to ask on a tour10 questions picked for this community from its record
Picked for this community from its record. Ask them in person and write down the answers.
- The state recorded a finding in May 2026. What was it, and how was it fixed?
- What does the base rate include, and when did rates last go up?
- How many caregivers are on duty during the day and at night?
- What happens if care needs increase? When would someone need to move?
- What fees are charged at move-in?
- How do you tell families about falls, illness or changes?
- How long have the executive director and the head of care been here?
- Who gives medications, and what training do they have?
- For what reasons can a resident be asked to leave?
- Is the apartment held during a hospital stay, and at what cost?
What we checked11 public sources we searched, with dates
Every public source we searched for this community. “Nothing on record” means we found no record that matched it. A record can be missed when a name or address differs.
| Source | Data as of | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Arizona Department of Health Services, Licensing Services inspection records | Oct 15, 2026 | See above |
| U.S. Department of Labor wage and hour cases | Oct 15, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| OSHA workplace safety inspections since 2016 | Oct 15, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| FEMA flood map | See above | |
| USDA wildfire risk | Apr 15, 2026 | Not shown: no FEMA wildfire rating of moderate or higher here |
| FEMA National Risk Index | See above | |
| CMS hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors; OpenStreetMap pharmacies | See above | |
| HUD Multifamily Properties - Assisted | Jul 6, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| State Veterans Homes (NASVH directory) | Sep 20, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| CMS Hospice - General Information | Aug 19, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| CMS Home Health Care Agencies | May 27, 2026 | Nothing on record |
Common questionsAnswers to 4 questions families ask
What type of care does Hartford Assisted Living provide?
Hartford Assisted Living is licensed by the state of Arizona for assisted living in Glendale, Arizona. Its licensed capacity is 10 residents.
Does Lilisity rate Hartford Assisted Living?
No. We publish state licensing details for Hartford Assisted Living but no score, rating, or ranking. Only communities on the Top Communities list or with a Senior Living Alliance Excellence Award, both based on phone-verified resident and family interviews, are ranked.
How much does Hartford Assisted Living cost?
Assisted Living in Maricopa County typically starts at $3,400 to $4,900 a month. Based on 65 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price. Hartford Assisted Living does not publish its prices.
How do I contact Hartford Assisted Living?
Visit Hartford Assisted Living at 3736 West Hartford Avenue, Glendale, AZ 85308.
How Lilisity works. The only scores or rankings Lilisity publishes are the Top Communities list and the Excellence Awards, both built from phone-verified resident and family interviews. Communities can pay Lilisity a flat monthly fee to manage their own listing: photos, prices, contact details, and receiving the inquiries families choose to send them. The fee is the same no matter how many families contact them or move in. Senior Living Alliance, which runs Lilisity, offers the same listing to its member communities as part of their membership; members pay SLA for its resident and family interview program. No community pays Lilisity per inquiry, per referral or per move-in. Payment never changes a testimonial, a rating, or the order of search results. The "Nearby Senior Living Alliance communities" box shows member communities only. How we verify testimonials · How we are paid