Lilisity

Assisted Living

Aging Gracefully

4101 West Hartford Avenue, Glendale, AZ 85308 · Map
Licensed for 9 residents

State license active
Is this your community? Claim this listing

Aging Gracefully is a state-licensed assisted living community in Glendale, Arizona. It is licensed for 9 residents. Lilisity publishes no score or ranking for this community; the details below come from the state licensing record.

Assisted LivingCare offered
9 residentsLicensed capacity
State licensedAssisted living home-directed
$3,400 to $4,900/moTypical assisted living start in Maricopa County, from 65 communities that publish prices

Prices

This community does not publish its prices.

Area costs

Assisted Living in Maricopa County typically starts at $3,400 to $4,900 a month. Based on 65 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price.

Lilisity’s independent report

What the public record shows

Gathered by Lilisity from state and federal sources. Communities can’t edit this part of the page.

State inspections

13Deficiencies cited
3Complaint inspections

Last inspection: May 7, 2026. See the record

License

Active, 9 residents

Assisted Living Home-Directed AL10404H.

Nearest emergency room

2.4 miles

Honorhealth Deer Valley Medical Center, rated 3 of 5 stars by CMS.

Side by side with nearby communities

The 4 nearest communities that offer assisted living, by straight-line distance. Prices are starting prices each community publishes; we never show estimates.

CommunityDistanceLicensed capacityPublished starting priceLicenseInspection citations
Aging Gracefully this community9Not publishedActive13 deficiencies, 2 enforcement cases
The Harbor Lighthouse II0.4 mi5Not publishedActive6 deficiencies, 0 enforcement cases
Hartford Assisted Living0.4 mi10Not publishedActive13 deficiencies, 1 enforcement case
Amiga 2 Assisted Living Home0.6 mi10Not publishedActive3 deficiencies, 0 enforcement cases
Avalon Cares of Arizona0.6 mi10Not publishedActive8 deficiencies, 1 enforcement case
State inspection record13 deficiencies, 2 enforcement cases
Last inspection
May 7, 2026
Inspections
3, 13 deficiencies cited
Complaint inspections
3, 2 with deficiencies cited
Enforcement cases
2, $1,500 in civil penalties
  • No deficiencies cited at the last inspection (May 2026)
  • License active since 2017

Enforcement cases

  • July 6, 2026: Civil Penalty $500 (complete); Notice of Enforcement Action (complete) case closed (complete)
  • October 9, 2024: Civil Penalty $1,000 (complete) case closed (complete)

April 14, 2026: complaint, compliance (annual) inspection, 10 deficiencies

  • Health care institutions; fall prevention and fall recovery; training programs; definition A.R.S. § 36-420.01.A
    Based on record review, documentation review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure the health care institution developed and administered a training program for all staff regarding fall prevention and fall recovery that included initial training and continued competency training in fall prevention and fall recovery, for one of two personnel sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk as the caregiver received no organized instruction or information related to physical health services provided to residents.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: June 6, 2026
  • Emergency responders; patient information; hospitals; discharge planning; patient screenings; discharge document A.R.S. § 36-420.04.A.1-9
    Based on record review and interview, the assisted living home failed to prepare a written document for emergency responders which included the reason emergency responders were requested on behalf of the resident, whether the resident received medication services, point of contact information for the assisted living home, including the telephone number and email address, and a copy of the resident's health insurance portability and accountability act release authorizing a receiving hospital to communicate with the assisted living home to plan for the resident's discharge, for one of two ...
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: June 12, 2026
  • Emergency responders; patient information; hospitals; discharge planning; patient screenings; discharge document A.R.S. § 36-420.04.C
    Based on record review and interview, the assisted living home failed to maintain a standardized form for each resident that includes whether the resident received medication services, point of contact information for the assisted living home, including the telephone number and email address, and a copy of the resident's health insurance portability and accountability act release authorizing a receiving hospital to communicate with the assisted living home to plan for the resident's discharge.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: June 12, 2026
  • Tuberculosis Screening R9-10-113.A.1-2
    Based on document review, record review, and interview, the health care institution's chief administrative officer failed to ensure that the health care institution implemented tuberculosis (TB) infection control activities, which included annually assessing the health care institution's risk of exposure to infectious TB and annually providing training and education related to recognizing the signs and symptoms of TB to individuals employed by or providing volunteer services for the health care institution. The deficient practice posed a potential risk of illness to residents.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: June 10, 2026
  • Personnel R9-10-806.A.8.a-b
    Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a caregiver who was expected to have more than eight hours per week of direct interaction with residents, provided documentation of screening for signs and symptoms of infectious tuberculosis (TB) as specified in R9-10-113, for one of two personnel sampled. The deficient practice posed a potential risk of illness to residents.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: June 10, 2026
Show all 9
  • Residency and Residency Agreements R9-10-807.A.1-2
    Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a resident provided evidence of freedom from infectious tuberculosis (TB) as specified in R9-10-113, for one of two residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a potential illness risk to residents.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: June 12, 2026
  • Service Plans R9-10-808.C.1.g
    Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure that the caregiver documented the services provided in a resident’s medical record according to the resident’s service plan for two of two residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk as services could not be verified as provided against a service plan.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: July 24, 2026
  • Directed Care Services R9-10-815.F.2.a-c
    Based on documentation review, observation and interview, the manager failed to ensure there was a means of exiting the facility for a resident who does not have a key, special knowledge for egress, or the ability to expend increased physical effort that provides access to an outside area from which a resident may exit to a location at least 30 feet away from the facility that was secure and monitored or alerted employees of the egress. The deficient practice posed a risk to the physical health and safety of residents.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: July 24, 2026
  • and 2 more in the report

August 23, 2024: complaint, compliance (annual) inspection, 3 deficiencies

  • Administration R9-10-803.A.9
    Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the governing authority failed to ensure compliance with A.R.S. § 36-411, for one of two sampled employees. The deficient practice posed a risk if E2 was a danger to a vulnerable population.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: September 14, 2024
  • Administration R9-10-803.J.2
    Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager, failed to report the suspected abuse of the resident according to A.R.S. § 46-454(A). The deficient practice posed a risk as the facility did not immediately report suspected abuse of a resident by a personnel member.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: September 14, 2024
  • Resident Rights R9-10-810.B.1
    Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a resident was treated with dignity, respect, and consideration. The deficient practice posed a resident rights violation if the resident was subjected to abuse.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: September 14, 2024

Inspections with no deficiencies listed

  • May 7, 2026: complaint inspection. No deficiencies were found during the on-site investigation of complaint 00168854 conducted on May 7, 2026.

Read the full record on AZ Care Check →

ADHS writes a Statement of Deficiencies after each inspection that finds a rule was not met. The community then files a plan of correction, which ADHS accepts or rejects. ADHS investigates complaints on site. A complaint inspection that ends with “No deficiencies were found” did not find a rule violation; deficiencies cited on a complaint inspection are listed with that inspection. AZ Care Check does not list complaints that did not lead to an on-site inspection. Enforcement cases are actions ADHS takes after an inspection, such as a civil money penalty, a provisional license or a license revocation, with their status. This community is licensed for 9 residents; larger communities are inspected and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Arizona Department of Health Services, Licensing Services, AZ Care Check, data as of October 15, 2026, showing all records on AZ Care Check (back to September 5, 2023). Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.

License and ownershipActive license
License type
Assisted Living Home-Directed
License number
AL10404H
License status
Active
Licensed capacity
9

Source: Arizona state licensing records (agency listing), retrieved 2026-09-09. Licensing status is a matter of public record; it is not a quality rating.

Paying with Medicaid and other programsHow Medicaid pays for care in Arizona, and other programs

How Medicaid pays for care in Arizona

  • Arizona Long Term Care System (ALTCS). Yes. Arizona's Medicaid long-term care program, ALTCS, is for people who need nursing facility level of care. Members do not have to live in a nursing home, and many live in an assisted living facility and get needed services there. (state page)

Ask the community whether it accepts Medicaid.

Location and nearby careNearest hospital 2.4 mi, nursing home 3.1 mi, pharmacy 1.1 mi
Nearest hospital with an emergency room
Honorhealth Deer Valley Medical Center, Phoenix. 2.4 miles away, straight line. CMS overall hospital rating: 3 of 5 stars.
Nearest Medicare nursing home
Life Care Center of North Glendale, Glendale. 3.1 miles away, straight line.
Nearest home health agency office
Enhabit Home Health, Glendale. 2.0 miles away, straight line. Agencies travel to clients, so ask which ones serve this address.
Nearest pharmacy
Walgreens. 1.1 miles away, straight line. From OpenStreetMap, which does not list every pharmacy, so one may be closer.
Area
USDA classes ZIP code 85308 as metropolitan (metropolitan core).
Dialysis within 15 miles
032647-Fmc North Mountain, Phoenix, 1.7 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 3 of 5 stars)
Davita Arrowhead Lakes Dialysis Center, Glendale, 2.4 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 3 of 5 stars)
032528 Thunderbird Dialysis (Fmc), Glendale, 3.0 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 3 of 5 stars)
Hospice
88 Medicare hospices tell CMS they serve ZIP code 85308.
Solace Hospice, LLC, office in Phoenix, 1.3 miles away, straight line
Bliss Hospice LLC, office in Phoenix, 2.1 miles away, straight line
Passion Hospice, office in Phoenix, 2.1 miles away, straight line
Nearest geriatric medicine practice
Neighborhood Outreach Access To Health, Phoenix. 2.6 miles away, straight line. 1 geriatric medicine doctor listed there.

Distances are straight lines from the community, not driving distance. Hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors come from CMS provider data (CMS, hospital list updated Jul 22, 2026). Star ratings are CMS’s own.

Emergency and natural hazard riskFEMA overall risk relatively low; outside FEMA's high-risk flood areas

Public hazard maps for this location. Ask the community about its emergency plan, its generator and where residents would go in an evacuation.

Flood zone
Zone X: 0.2% annual chance (500-year) flood area (moderate risk). (FEMA flood map)
FEMA National Risk Index
Overall: relatively low. By hazard: hurricane very low, inland flooding relatively low, tornado very low, heat wave very high, earthquake very low. These are FEMA’s ratings for the census tract, compared with tracts nationwide. (FEMA, December 2025)

A flood zone describes the map at this point, not the building's elevation. In an emergency, follow the local emergency management agency.

Questions to ask on a tour10 questions picked for this community from its record

Picked for this community from its record. Ask them in person and write down the answers.

  1. The state recorded a finding in April 2026. What was it, and how was it fixed?
  2. What does the base rate include, and when did rates last go up?
  3. Who is here at night? Are they awake, or asleep and on call?
  4. Who covers when the owner is sick, on vacation, or away for the day? Can we meet them?
  5. Is it one flat rate, or does it rise with care needs?
  6. Can you help someone who needs two people to move, or a mechanical lift?
  7. How many caregivers are on duty during the day and at night?
  8. What happens if care needs increase? When would someone need to move?
  9. What fees are charged at move-in?
  10. How do you tell families about falls, illness or changes?
What we checked11 public sources we searched, with dates

Every public source we searched for this community. “Nothing on record” means we found no record that matched it. A record can be missed when a name or address differs.

SourceData as ofWhat we found
Arizona Department of Health Services, Licensing Services inspection recordsOct 15, 2026See above
U.S. Department of Labor wage and hour casesOct 15, 2026Nothing on record
OSHA workplace safety inspections since 2016Oct 15, 2026Nothing on record
FEMA flood mapSee above
USDA wildfire riskApr 15, 2026Not shown: no FEMA wildfire rating of moderate or higher here
FEMA National Risk IndexSee above
CMS hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors; OpenStreetMap pharmaciesSee above
HUD Multifamily Properties - AssistedJul 6, 2026Nothing on record
State Veterans Homes (NASVH directory)Sep 20, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Hospice - General InformationAug 19, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Home Health Care AgenciesMay 27, 2026Nothing on record
Common questionsAnswers to 4 questions families ask
What type of care does Aging Gracefully provide?

Aging Gracefully is licensed by the state of Arizona for assisted living in Glendale, Arizona. Its licensed capacity is 9 residents.

Does Lilisity rate Aging Gracefully?

No. We publish state licensing details for Aging Gracefully but no score, rating, or ranking. Only communities on the Top Communities list or with a Senior Living Alliance Excellence Award, both based on phone-verified resident and family interviews, are ranked.

How much does Aging Gracefully cost?

Assisted Living in Maricopa County typically starts at $3,400 to $4,900 a month. Based on 65 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price. Aging Gracefully does not publish its prices.

How do I contact Aging Gracefully?

Visit Aging Gracefully at 4101 West Hartford Avenue, Glendale, AZ 85308.

Choosing a small care homeOur care guide: what to look for, what it costs, how families pay, and more questions to ask (PDF)

Report a wrong fact

How Lilisity works. The only scores or rankings Lilisity publishes are the Top Communities list and the Excellence Awards, both built from phone-verified resident and family interviews. Communities can pay Lilisity a flat monthly fee to manage their own listing: photos, prices, contact details, and receiving the inquiries families choose to send them. The fee is the same no matter how many families contact them or move in. Senior Living Alliance, which runs Lilisity, offers the same listing to its member communities as part of their membership; members pay SLA for its resident and family interview program. No community pays Lilisity per inquiry, per referral or per move-in. Payment never changes a testimonial, a rating, or the order of search results. The "Nearby Senior Living Alliance communities" box shows member communities only. How we verify testimonials · How we are paid