Assisted Living
Crossroads Assisted Living, 5833 North Escondido Lane
5833 North Escondido Lane, Tucson, AZ 85704 · Map
Licensed for 10 residents
Crossroads Assisted Living, 5833 North Escondido Lane is a state-licensed assisted living community in Tucson, Arizona. It is licensed for 10 residents. Lilisity publishes no score or ranking for this community; the details below come from the state licensing record.
Prices
This community does not publish its prices.
Area costs
Lilisity’s independent report
What the public record shows
Gathered by Lilisity from state and federal sources. Communities can’t edit this part of the page.
State inspections
Last inspection: Jul 21, 2026. See the record
License
Active, 10 residents
Assisted Living Home-Directed AL13232H.
Nearest emergency room
3.3 miles
Northwest Medical Center, rated 2 of 5 stars by CMS.
Side by side with nearby communities
The 4 nearest communities that offer assisted living, by straight-line distance. Prices are starting prices each community publishes; we never show estimates.
| Community | Distance | Licensed capacity | Published starting price | License | Inspection citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crossroads Assisted Living, 5833 North Escondido Lane this community | 10 | Not published | Active | 15 deficiencies, 1 enforcement case | |
| Crossroads Assisted Living, 5825 North Escondido Lane | 0.0 mi | 10 | Not published | Active | 13 deficiencies, 2 enforcement cases |
| Desert Oasis Healthy Living | 0.3 mi | 9 | Not published | Active | 7 deficiencies, 1 enforcement case |
| Ridgecrest I | 0.6 mi | 10 | Not published | Active | 1 deficiency, 0 enforcement cases |
| Las Palmas Assisted Living Home | 0.7 mi | 10 | Not published | Active | 15 deficiencies, 3 enforcement cases |
State inspection record15 deficiencies, 1 enforcement case
- Last inspection
- July 21, 2026
- Inspections
- 4, 15 deficiencies cited
- Complaint inspections
- 1, 1 with deficiencies cited
- Enforcement cases
- 1, $500 in civil penalties
- License active since 2024
Enforcement cases
- November 25, 2025: Civil Penalty $500 (complete) case closed (complete)
July 21, 2026: complaint, compliance (annual) inspection, 7 deficiencies
- Emergency responders; patient information; hospitals; discharge planning; patient screenings; discharge document A.R.S. § 36-420.04.C
Based on documentation review, observation, and interview, the assisted living home failed to maintain a standardized form for each resident which included the information prescribed in subsection A of this section, for two of two sampled residents.
Approved - Emergency responders; patient information; hospitals; discharge planning; patient screenings; discharge document A.R.S. § 36-420.04.D
Based on documentation review and interview, the assisted living home failed to maintain a copy of the documentation provided to an emergency responder for two years after the date of an emergency.
Approved - Residency and Residency Agreements R9-10-807.D.2.a-c
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a residency agreement included the date of occupancy or expected date of occupancy.
Approved - Service Plans R9-10-808.C.1.g
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a caregiver documented the services provided in a resident's medical record, for one of two sampled residents.
Approved - Personal Care Services R9-10-814.B.1-2
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to obtain a determination from a resident's primary care provider or other medical practitioner for a resident who was unable to ambulate when the resident was accepted by the assisted living facility, for one of two sampled residents.
Approved - Medication Services R9-10-817.B.3.b
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a medication administered to a resident was administered in compliance with a medication order, for two of two sampled residents. The deficient practice posed a risk if the resident experienced a change in condition due to improper administration of medication.
Approved - Emergency and Safety Standards R9-10-819.A.7.a
Based on documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure an elopement drill was conducted every six months on each shift and documented.
Approved
August 1, 2025: compliance (annual) inspection, 8 deficiencies
- Personnel R9-10-806.A.8.a-b
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a caregiver who was expected to have more than eight hours per week of direct interaction with residents, provided evidence of freedom from infectious tuberculosis as specified in R0-10-113, on or before the date the individual began providing services at the assisted living facility for one of two personnel sampled. The deficient practice posed a potential TB exposure risk to residents.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: August 2, 2025 - Residency and Residency Agreements R9-10-807.A.1-2
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a resident provided evidence of freedom from infectious tuberculosis (TB) within seven calendar days after the resident's date of occupancy and as specified in R9-10-113 for one of two residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a potential illness risk to residents.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: August 4, 2025 - Service Plans R9-10-808.A.3.c
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a resident's written service plan accurately included the amount, type, and frequency of assisted living services being provided to the resident, for two of two residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk if a resident's service plan did not include the services to be provided.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: August 4, 2025 - Directed Care Services R9-10-815.F.2.a-c
Based on observation and interview, for a facility authorized to provide directed care services, the manager failed to ensure there was a means of exiting the facility that provided access to an outside area which allowed a resident to be at least 30 feet away from the facility and monitored or alerted employees of the egress of a resident from the facility. The deficient practice posed a risk if the facility was unaware of the general or specific whereabouts of a resident.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: August 4, 2025 - Medication Services R9-10-817.B.3.b
Based on record review, observation, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a medication was administered to a resident in compliance with a medication order for one of two residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk if the resident experienced a change in condition due to improper administration of medication.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: August 4, 2025
Show all 8
- Medication Services R9-10-817.B.3.c
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a medication administered to a resident was documented in the resident's medical record for one of two residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk as medication could not be verified as administered against a medication order.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: August 4, 2025 - Medication Services R9-10-817.F.1
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure that medication was stored in a separate locked room, closet, cabinet, or self-contained unit used only for medication storage. The deficient practice posed a risk to residents who were unable to self-administer medications.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: August 4, 2025 - Environmental Standards R9-10-820.A.6
Based on observation and interview, the manager failed to ensure the hot water temperatures were maintained between 95°F and 120° F in areas of an assisted living facility used by residents.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: August 4, 2025
Inspections with no deficiencies listed
- December 27, 2024: initial monitoring inspection. No deficiencies were found during the on-site abbreviated initial follow-up inspection conducted on December 27, 2024.
- October 11, 2024: compliance (initial) inspection. No deficiencies were found during the on-site initial inspection conducted on October 11, 2024 and the off-site documentation review completed on October 17, 2024.
Read the full record on AZ Care Check →
ADHS writes a Statement of Deficiencies after each inspection that finds a rule was not met. The community then files a plan of correction, which ADHS accepts or rejects. ADHS investigates complaints on site. A complaint inspection that ends with “No deficiencies were found” did not find a rule violation; deficiencies cited on a complaint inspection are listed with that inspection. AZ Care Check does not list complaints that did not lead to an on-site inspection. Enforcement cases are actions ADHS takes after an inspection, such as a civil money penalty, a provisional license or a license revocation, with their status. This community is licensed for 10 residents; larger communities are inspected and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Arizona Department of Health Services, Licensing Services, AZ Care Check, data as of October 15, 2026, showing all records on AZ Care Check (back to September 5, 2023). Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.
License and ownershipActive license
- License type
- Assisted Living Home-Directed
- License number
- AL13232H
- License status
- Active
- Licensed capacity
- 10
- County
- Pima County
- Founder & Administrator
- Katherine Keim
Source: Arizona state licensing records (agency listing), retrieved 2026-09-09. Licensing status is a matter of public record; it is not a quality rating.
Founder & Administrator name from public records we reviewed, as of Oct 12, 2026.
Paying with Medicaid and other programsHow Medicaid pays for care in Arizona, and other programs
How Medicaid pays for care in Arizona
- Arizona Long Term Care System (ALTCS). Yes. Arizona's Medicaid long-term care program, ALTCS, is for people who need nursing facility level of care. Members do not have to live in a nursing home, and many live in an assisted living facility and get needed services there. (state page)
Ask the community whether it accepts Medicaid.
Location and nearby careNearest hospital 3.3 mi, nursing home 0.8 mi, pharmacy 1.2 mi
- Nearest hospital with an emergency room
- Northwest Medical Center, Tucson. 3.3 miles away, straight line. CMS overall hospital rating: 2 of 5 stars. Location approximate.
- Nearest Medicare nursing home
- Casas Adobes Post Acute Rehab Center, Tucson. 0.8 miles away, straight line.
- Nearest home health agency office
- Bayada Home Health Care, Inc, Tucson. 1.7 miles away, straight line. Agencies travel to clients, so ask which ones serve this address.
- Nearest pharmacy
- Walgreens. 1.2 miles away, straight line. From OpenStreetMap, which does not list every pharmacy, so one may be closer.
- Area
- USDA classes ZIP code 85704 as metropolitan (metropolitan core).
- Dialysis within 15 miles
- 032613 Northwest Tucson Dialysis (Fmc), Tucson, 1.4 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 3 of 5 stars)
Davita Northwest Tucson Dialysis, Tucson, 2.9 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 3 of 5 stars)
032514 Desert Dialysis Center (Dci), Tucson, 4.0 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 3 of 5 stars) - Hospice
- 36 Medicare hospices tell CMS they serve ZIP code 85704.
Anthem East LLC, office in Tucson, 1.3 miles away, straight line
Traditions Health, office in Tucson, 1.6 miles away, straight line
Sunset Hospice LLC, office in Tucson, 2.1 miles away, straight line - Nearest geriatric medicine practice
- Banner-University Medical Group, Tucson. 3.7 miles away, straight line. 1 geriatric medicine doctor listed there.
Distances are straight lines from the community, not driving distance. Hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors come from CMS provider data (CMS, hospital list updated Jul 22, 2026). Star ratings are CMS’s own.
Emergency and natural hazard riskFEMA overall risk relatively moderate; outside FEMA's high-risk flood areas
Public hazard maps for this location. Ask the community about its emergency plan, its generator and where residents would go in an evacuation.
- Flood zone
- Outside the high and moderate risk flood areas on FEMA's flood map (Zone X, minimal flood hazard, or not studied). (FEMA flood map)
- FEMA National Risk Index
- Overall: relatively moderate. By hazard: hurricane very low, inland flooding very high, wildfire relatively low, tornado very low, heat wave very high, earthquake relatively low. These are FEMA’s ratings for the census tract, compared with tracts nationwide. (FEMA, December 2025)
A flood zone describes the map at this point, not the building's elevation. In an emergency, follow the local emergency management agency.
Questions to ask on a tour10 questions picked for this community from its record
Picked for this community from its record. Ask them in person and write down the answers.
- The state recorded a finding in July 2026. What was it, and how was it fixed?
- What does the base rate include, and when did rates last go up?
- How many caregivers are on duty during the day and at night?
- What happens if care needs increase? When would someone need to move?
- What fees are charged at move-in?
- How do you tell families about falls, illness or changes?
- How long have the executive director and the head of care been here?
- Who gives medications, and what training do they have?
- For what reasons can a resident be asked to leave?
- Is the apartment held during a hospital stay, and at what cost?
What we checked12 public sources we searched, with dates
Every public source we searched for this community. “Nothing on record” means we found no record that matched it. A record can be missed when a name or address differs.
| Source | Data as of | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Arizona Department of Health Services, Licensing Services inspection records | Oct 15, 2026 | See above |
| U.S. Department of Labor wage and hour cases | Oct 15, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| OSHA workplace safety inspections since 2016 | Oct 15, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| FEMA flood map | See above | |
| USDA wildfire risk | Apr 15, 2026 | Not shown: FEMA rates wildfire risk here relatively low |
| FEMA National Risk Index | See above | |
| CMS hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors; OpenStreetMap pharmacies | See above | |
| HUD Multifamily Properties - Assisted | Jul 6, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| State Veterans Homes (NASVH directory) | Sep 20, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| CMS Hospice - General Information | Aug 19, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| CMS Home Health Care Agencies | May 27, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| The community’s own website | No plain statements of services found |
Common questionsAnswers to 4 questions families ask
What type of care does Crossroads Assisted Living, 5833 North Escondido Lane provide?
Crossroads Assisted Living, 5833 North Escondido Lane is licensed by the state of Arizona for assisted living in Tucson, Arizona. Its licensed capacity is 10 residents.
Does Lilisity rate Crossroads Assisted Living, 5833 North Escondido Lane?
No. We publish state licensing details for Crossroads Assisted Living, 5833 North Escondido Lane but no score, rating, or ranking. Only communities on the Top Communities list or with a Senior Living Alliance Excellence Award, both based on phone-verified resident and family interviews, are ranked.
How much does Crossroads Assisted Living, 5833 North Escondido Lane cost?
Assisted Living in Arizona typically starts at $3,450 to $5,250 a month. Based on 88 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price. Crossroads Assisted Living, 5833 North Escondido Lane does not publish its prices.
How do I contact Crossroads Assisted Living, 5833 North Escondido Lane?
Use Crossroads Assisted Living, 5833 North Escondido Lane's website, keimcares.com, or visit at 5833 North Escondido Lane, Tucson, AZ 85704.
How Lilisity works. The only scores or rankings Lilisity publishes are the Top Communities list and the Excellence Awards, both built from phone-verified resident and family interviews. Communities can pay Lilisity a flat monthly fee to manage their own listing: photos, prices, contact details, and receiving the inquiries families choose to send them. The fee is the same no matter how many families contact them or move in. Senior Living Alliance, which runs Lilisity, offers the same listing to its member communities as part of their membership; members pay SLA for its resident and family interview program. No community pays Lilisity per inquiry, per referral or per move-in. Payment never changes a testimonial, a rating, or the order of search results. The "Nearby Senior Living Alliance communities" box shows member communities only. How we verify testimonials · How we are paid