Lilisity

Assisted Living

Beehive Homes

324 East 1st Street, Eagar, AZ 85925 · Map
Licensed for 16 residents

State license active
Is this your community? Claim this listing

Beehive Homes is a state-licensed assisted living community in Eagar, Arizona. It is licensed for 16 residents. Lilisity publishes no score or ranking for this community; the details below come from the state licensing record.

Assisted LivingCare offered
16 residentsLicensed capacity
State licensedAssisted living center-directed
$3,450 to $5,250/moTypical assisted living start in Arizona, from 88 communities that publish prices

Prices

This community does not publish its prices.

Area costs

Assisted Living in Arizona typically starts at $3,450 to $5,250 a month. Based on 88 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price.

Lilisity’s independent report

What the public record shows

Gathered by Lilisity from state and federal sources. Communities can’t edit this part of the page.

State inspections

33Deficiencies cited
1Complaint inspections

Last inspection: Jan 13, 2026. See the record

License

Active, 16 residents

Assisted Living Center-Directed AL6954C.

Nearest emergency room

1.4 miles

White Mountain Regional Medical Center.

Side by side with nearby communities

The 4 nearest communities that offer assisted living, by straight-line distance. Prices are starting prices each community publishes; we never show estimates.

CommunityDistanceLicensed capacityPublished starting priceLicenseInspection citations
Beehive Homes this community16Not publishedActive33 deficiencies, 2 enforcement cases
Haven of Show Low ALF42.3 mi36Not publishedActive19 deficiencies, 2 enforcement cases
Mountain Care of Snowflake53.0 mi20Not publishedActive12 deficiencies, 1 enforcement case
Carriage House on West Garden Lane55.3 mi32Not publishedActive6 deficiencies, 0 enforcement cases
Beehive Home of Snowflake55.7 mi15Not publishedActive7 deficiencies, 1 enforcement case
State inspection record33 deficiencies, 2 enforcement cases
Last inspection
January 13, 2026
Inspections
3, 33 deficiencies cited
Complaint inspections
1, 1 with deficiencies cited
Enforcement cases
2, $3,000 in civil penalties
  • License active since 2008

Enforcement cases

  • April 30, 2026: Civil Penalty $1,000 (complete); Notice of Enforcement Action (complete) case closed (complete)
  • January 21, 2025: Civil Penalty $2,000 (complete) case closed (complete)

January 13, 2026: complaint, compliance (annual) inspection, 9 deficiencies

  • Health care institutions; fall prevention and fall recovery; training programs; definition A.R.S. § 36-420.01.A
    Based on record review and interview, the governing authority failed to administer a training program for all staff regarding fall prevention and fall recovery. The deficient practice posed a risk if a staff member was not properly trained to assist a resident who had fallen and was unable to recover independently.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: May 15, 2026
  • Emergency responders; patient information; hospitals; discharge planning; patient screenings; discharge document A.R.S. § 36-420.04.C
    Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the assisted living home failed to maintain a standardized form for each resident that included the information prescribed in A.R.S. 36-420.04.A.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: May 15, 2026
  • Personnel R9-10-806.A.8.a-b
    Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a caregiver provided evidence of freedom from infectious tuberculosis (TB) on or before the date the individual began providing services at or on behalf of the assisted living facility as specified in Arizona Administrative Code (A.A.C.) R9-10-113, for one of two sampled personnel members. The deficient practice posed a potential TB exposure risk to residents.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: May 15, 2026
  • Personnel R9-10-806.A.10
    Based on record review, documentation review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a caregiver provided current documentation of first aid training training for one of two employees sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk if an employee was unable to meet the needs of residents.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: May 15, 2026
  • Residency and Residency Agreements R9-10-807.A.1-2
    Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a resident provided evidence of freedom from infectious tuberculosis (TB) as specified in R9-10-113, for two of two residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a TB exposure risk to residents.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: May 15, 2026
Show all 9
  • Residency and Residency Agreements R9-10-807.B.1.a-b
    Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure that before or at the time of acceptance of an individual, the individual submitted documentation that was dated 90 calendar days before the individual was accepted by the assisted living facility and included whether the individual required continuous medical services, continuous or intermittent nursing services, or restraints and was dated and signed by a medical practitioner or registered nurse, for one of two residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk if the facility was unable to meet a resident's needs.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: May 15, 2026
  • Medical Records R9-10-811.A.1
    Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a medical record was maintained for each resident according to A.R.S. Title 12, Chapter 13, Article 7.1, for one of two residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk as required information could not be verified for the sampled resident.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: May 15, 2026
  • Personal Care Services R9-10-814.B.1-2
    Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure the facility did not accept or retain a resident who was confined to a bed or chair because of an inability to ambulate even with assistance, unless the facility obtained a written determination from a medical practitioner, upon acceptance and every six months thereafter, that stated the resident's needs could be met by the facility and the resident's needs were within the facility's scope of services, for one of two residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk if the facility was unable to meet a resident's needs.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: May 15, 2026
  • and 1 more in the report

February 10, 2025: compliance (annual) inspection, 12 deficiencies

  • Quality Management R9-10-804.1.e
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: January 29, 2025
  • Quality Management R9-10-804.1.e
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: January 29, 2025
  • Personnel R9-10-806.A.8.a-b
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: January 29, 2025
  • Personnel R9-10-806.A.8.a-b
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: January 29, 2025
  • Personnel R9-10-806.C.1.a-c
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: January 29, 2025
Show all 9
  • Personnel R9-10-806.C.1.a-c
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: January 29, 2025
  • Directed Care Services R9-10-815.B.1
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: January 29, 2025
  • Directed Care Services R9-10-815.B.1
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: January 29, 2025
  • and 4 more in the report

November 13, 2024: compliance (annual) inspection, 12 deficiencies

  • Quality Management R9-10-804.1.e
    Based on documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a quality management plan is established, documented and implemented that includes the frequency of submitting a documented report to the governing authority.
    Plan of correction accepted
  • Quality Management R9-10-804.1.e
    Based on documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a quality management plan is established, documented and implemented that includes the frequency of submitting a documented report to the governing authority.
    Plan of correction accepted
  • Personnel R9-10-806.A.8.a-b
    Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure that one of one personnel record, for personnel who work more than eight hours per week, contained evidence of freedom from infectious tuberculosis (TB), as specified in R9-10-113.
    Plan of correction accepted
  • Personnel R9-10-806.A.8.a-b
    Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure that one of one personnel record, for personnel who work more than eight hours per week, contained evidence of freedom from infectious tuberculosis (TB), as specified in R9-10-113.
    Plan of correction accepted
  • Personnel R9-10-806.C.1.a-c
    Based on record review and interview the manager failed to ensure that a record for four of four volunteers included all the information required in sub-sections a. through c. of this rule.
    Plan of correction accepted
Show all 9
  • Personnel R9-10-806.C.1.a-c
    Based on record review and interview the manager failed to ensure that a record for four of four volunteers included all the information required in sub-sections a. through c. of this rule.
    Plan of correction accepted
  • Directed Care Services R9-10-815.B.1
    Based on record review and interview for two of two sample resident records, the manager failed to obtain the following documentation: documentation reflecting that the resident or resident's representative requested that the resident remain in the facility; a signed and dated statement from a medical practitioner indicating that the resident's needs were being met by the facility as per their scope of services and at least once every six months throughout the duration of the resident's condition.
    Plan of correction accepted
  • Directed Care Services R9-10-815.B.1
    Based on record review and interview for two of two sample resident records, the manager failed to obtain the following documentation: documentation reflecting that the resident or resident's representative requested that the resident remain in the facility; a signed and dated statement from a medical practitioner indicating that the resident's needs were being met by the facility as per their scope of services and at least once every six months throughout the duration of the resident's condition.
    Plan of correction accepted
  • and 4 more in the report

Read the full record on AZ Care Check →

ADHS writes a Statement of Deficiencies after each inspection that finds a rule was not met. The community then files a plan of correction, which ADHS accepts or rejects. ADHS investigates complaints on site. A complaint inspection that ends with “No deficiencies were found” did not find a rule violation; deficiencies cited on a complaint inspection are listed with that inspection. AZ Care Check does not list complaints that did not lead to an on-site inspection. Enforcement cases are actions ADHS takes after an inspection, such as a civil money penalty, a provisional license or a license revocation, with their status. This community is licensed for 16 residents; larger communities are inspected and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Arizona Department of Health Services, Licensing Services, AZ Care Check, data as of October 15, 2026, showing all records on AZ Care Check (back to September 5, 2023). Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.

License and ownershipActive license
License type
Assisted Living Center-Directed
License number
AL6954C
License status
Active
Licensed capacity
16

Source: Arizona state licensing records (agency listing), retrieved 2026-09-09. Licensing status is a matter of public record; it is not a quality rating.

Paying with Medicaid and other programsHow Medicaid pays for care in Arizona, and other programs

How Medicaid pays for care in Arizona

  • Arizona Long Term Care System (ALTCS). Yes. Arizona's Medicaid long-term care program, ALTCS, is for people who need nursing facility level of care. Members do not have to live in a nursing home, and many live in an assisted living facility and get needed services there. (state page)

Ask the community whether it accepts Medicaid.

Location and nearby careNearest hospital 1.4 mi, nursing home 42.5 mi, pharmacy 28.0 mi
Nearest hospital with an emergency room
White Mountain Regional Medical Center, Springerville. 1.4 miles away, straight line.
Nearest Medicare nursing home
Haven of Lakeside, Lakeside. 42.5 miles away, straight line.
Nearest home health agency office
Summit Healthcare Home Health, Show Low. 42.2 miles away, straight line. Agencies travel to clients, so ask which ones serve this address.
Nearest pharmacy
St. John's Drug. 28.0 miles away, straight line. From OpenStreetMap, which does not list every pharmacy, so one may be closer.
Area
USDA classes ZIP code 85925 as rural (rural area).
Hospice
6 Medicare hospices tell CMS they serve ZIP code 85925.
Nearest geriatric medicine practice
Banner Urgent Care Services LLC, San Tan Valley. 143.8 miles away, straight line. 1 geriatric medicine doctor listed there.

Distances are straight lines from the community, not driving distance. Hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors come from CMS provider data (CMS, hospital list updated Jul 22, 2026). Star ratings are CMS’s own.

Emergency and natural hazard riskFEMA overall risk relatively moderate; outside FEMA's high-risk flood areas

Public hazard maps for this location. Ask the community about its emergency plan, its generator and where residents would go in an evacuation.

Flood zone
Outside the high and moderate risk flood areas on FEMA's flood map (Zone X, minimal flood hazard, or not studied). (FEMA flood map)
Wildfire risk to homes
In Eagar, AZ, risk to homes is greater than 83% of communities in Arizona and 97% of communities nationwide. USDA rates the whole town or city, not this address. (USDA Forest Service, Wildfire Risk to Communities, April 2026)
FEMA National Risk Index
Overall: relatively moderate. By hazard: hurricane very low, inland flooding relatively high, wildfire relatively high, tornado very low, heat wave relatively low, earthquake relatively low. These are FEMA’s ratings for the census tract, compared with tracts nationwide. (FEMA, December 2025)

A flood zone describes the map at this point, not the building's elevation. In an emergency, follow the local emergency management agency.

Questions to ask on a tour10 questions picked for this community from its record

Picked for this community from its record. Ask them in person and write down the answers.

  1. The state recorded a finding in January 2026. What was it, and how was it fixed?
  2. What does the base rate include, and when did rates last go up?
  3. How many caregivers are on duty during the day and at night?
  4. What happens if care needs increase? When would someone need to move?
  5. What fees are charged at move-in?
  6. How do you tell families about falls, illness or changes?
  7. How long have the executive director and the head of care been here?
  8. Who gives medications, and what training do they have?
  9. For what reasons can a resident be asked to leave?
  10. Is the apartment held during a hospital stay, and at what cost?
What we checked11 public sources we searched, with dates

Every public source we searched for this community. “Nothing on record” means we found no record that matched it. A record can be missed when a name or address differs.

SourceData as ofWhat we found
Arizona Department of Health Services, Licensing Services inspection recordsOct 15, 2026See above
U.S. Department of Labor wage and hour casesOct 15, 2026Nothing on record
OSHA workplace safety inspections since 2016Oct 15, 2026Nothing on record
FEMA flood mapSee above
USDA wildfire riskApr 15, 2026See above
FEMA National Risk IndexSee above
CMS hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors; OpenStreetMap pharmaciesSee above
HUD Multifamily Properties - AssistedJul 6, 2026Nothing on record
State Veterans Homes (NASVH directory)Sep 20, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Hospice - General InformationAug 19, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Home Health Care AgenciesMay 27, 2026Nothing on record
Common questionsAnswers to 4 questions families ask
What type of care does Beehive Homes provide?

Beehive Homes is licensed by the state of Arizona for assisted living in Eagar, Arizona. Its licensed capacity is 16 residents.

Does Lilisity rate Beehive Homes?

No. We publish state licensing details for Beehive Homes but no score, rating, or ranking. Only communities on the Top Communities list or with a Senior Living Alliance Excellence Award, both based on phone-verified resident and family interviews, are ranked.

How much does Beehive Homes cost?

Assisted Living in Arizona typically starts at $3,450 to $5,250 a month. Based on 88 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price. Beehive Homes does not publish its prices.

How do I contact Beehive Homes?

Visit Beehive Homes at 324 East 1st Street, Eagar, AZ 85925.

Choosing assisted livingOur care guide: what to look for, what it costs, how families pay, and more questions to ask (PDF)

Report a wrong fact

How Lilisity works. The only scores or rankings Lilisity publishes are the Top Communities list and the Excellence Awards, both built from phone-verified resident and family interviews. Communities can pay Lilisity a flat monthly fee to manage their own listing: photos, prices, contact details, and receiving the inquiries families choose to send them. The fee is the same no matter how many families contact them or move in. Senior Living Alliance, which runs Lilisity, offers the same listing to its member communities as part of their membership; members pay SLA for its resident and family interview program. No community pays Lilisity per inquiry, per referral or per move-in. Payment never changes a testimonial, a rating, or the order of search results. The "Nearby Senior Living Alliance communities" box shows member communities only. How we verify testimonials · How we are paid