Lilisity

Independent Living and Assisted Living

Atria Campana Del Rio

1550 and 1580 East River Road, Tucson, AZ 85718 · Map
Licensed for 100 residents

State license active
Is this your community? Claim this listing

Atria Campana Del Rio is a state-licensed independent living, assisted living community in Tucson, Arizona. It is licensed for 100 residents. Lilisity publishes no score or ranking for this community; the details below come from the state licensing record.

Independent LivingAlso assisted living
100 residentsLicensed capacity
State licensedAssisted living center-directed
From $1,995/moStarting price

Prices

Starting prices the community publishes, with the date we checked each one and a link to where it is published. Care charges are usually added after an assessment.

CareStarting atChecked
Independent Living$2,995 /moOct 12, 2026
Assisted Living$1,995 /moOct 12, 2026

Area costs

Assisted Living in Arizona typically starts at $3,450 to $5,250 a month. Based on 88 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price.
Independent Living in Arizona typically starts at $3,000 to $5,300 a month. Based on 23 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price.

Care and services

From the community’s website

What Atria Campana Del Rio says about itself, quoted from its own site. We have not checked these claims against licensing records. Ask about each one on a tour.

  • Provides transportation. Private apartment, 24/7 staff, chef-prepared meals, housekeeping and linen laundering services, scheduled local transportation, community and grounds maintenance, basic utilities, and a calendar of daily events. (page, checked Oct 12, 2026)
  • 3 meals a day. Atria Campana del Rio provides three chef-prepared meals per day, which are included in the cost of rent. (page, checked Oct 12, 2026)
  • Pets allowed. Yes, Atria Campana del Rio allows pets. (page, checked Oct 12, 2026)
  • Apartment types named: studio, one-bedroom, two-bedroom. Atria Campana del Rio offers a selection of studio, one-bedroom and two-bedroom senior apartments. (page, checked Oct 12, 2026)
  • Entrance fee: none. No buy-in fees. (page, checked Oct 12, 2026)

Lilisity’s independent report

What the public record shows

Gathered by Lilisity from state and federal sources. Communities can’t edit this part of the page.

State inspections

18Deficiencies cited
6Complaint inspections

Last inspection: Jun 1, 2026. See the record

License

Active, 100 residents

Assisted Living Center-Directed AL8344C.

Nearest emergency room

3.3 miles

Banner - University Medical Center Tucson Campus, rated 3 of 5 stars by CMS.

Side by side with nearby communities

The 4 nearest communities that offer assisted living, by straight-line distance. Prices are starting prices each community publishes; we never show estimates.

CommunityDistanceLicensed capacityPublished starting priceLicenseInspection citations
Atria Campana Del Rio this community100$1,995/moActive18 deficiencies, 3 enforcement cases
Canyon View by Platinum Care Homes0.4 mi10Not publishedActive14 deficiencies, 3 enforcement cases
River Rose Senior Care0.7 mi10Not publishedActive6 deficiencies, 1 enforcement case
Sunrise at River Road0.9 mi110$3,300/moActive1 deficiency, 0 enforcement cases
Hacienda at the River1.0 mi84$5,295/moActive58 deficiencies, 4 enforcement cases
State inspection record18 deficiencies, 3 enforcement cases
Last inspection
June 1, 2026
Inspections
8, 18 deficiencies cited
Complaint inspections
6, 1 with deficiencies cited
Enforcement cases
3, $2,500 in civil penalties
  • License active since 2011

Enforcement cases

  • July 20, 2026: Civil Penalty $1,000 (complete); Notice of Enforcement Action (complete) case closed (complete)
  • April 2, 2025: Civil Penalty $1,000 (complete) case closed (complete)
  • January 30, 2024: Civil Penalty $500 (complete) case closed (complete)

June 1, 2026: complaint, compliance (annual) inspection, 5 deficiencies

  • Emergency responders; patient information; hospitals; discharge planning; patient screenings; discharge document A.R.S. § 36-420.04.D
    Based on record review, documentation review, and interview, the assisted living center failed to maintain a copy of all documentation provided to an emergency responder for a period of two years after the date of the emergency. The deficient practice posed a risk if an emergency responder or receiving hospital was not provided with necessary information about a resident.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: August 24, 2026
  • Tuberculosis Screening R9-10-113.A.2.a-f
    Based on record review, documentation review, and interview, the chief administrative officer failed to ensure tuberculosis infection control activities were implemented, including baseline screening of residents and employees and annually assessing the health care institution's risk of exposure to infectious tuberculosis, for three of six sampled residents and eight of ten sampled employees.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: August 8, 2026
  • Opioid Prescribing and Treatment R9-10-120.F.4.a-c
    Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a resident's need for an opioid was assessed and documented prior to the administration of an opioid, and failed to ensure a resident's response to an opioid was monitored and documented, for one of one sampled resident who received administration of an opioid.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: August 10, 2026
  • Administration R9-10-803.A.9
    Based on record review, documentation review, and interview, the governing authority failed to ensure compliance with A.R.S. § 36-411(C), for seven of ten personnel records reviewed. The deficient practice posed a risk if a personnel member was a danger to a vulnerable population.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: August 5, 2026
  • Personnel R9-10-806.A.10
    Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a caregiver provided documentation of first aid training, for one of five sampled caregivers. The deficient practice posed a risk if an employee was unable to meet a resident's needs during an emergency.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: August 8, 2026

February 24, 2025: compliance (annual) inspection, 9 deficiencies

  • Tuberculosis Screening R9-10-113.A.2.a-f
    Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the health care institution's chief administrative officer failed to ensure the health care institution documented, and implemented tuberculosis (TB) infection control activities required in R9-10-113.A.2.a-f.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: March 3, 2025
  • Administration R9-10-803.A.9
    Based on record review, documentation review, and interview, the governing authority failed to ensure compliance with A.R.S. § 36-411, for five of nine personnel records reviewed. The deficient practice posed a risk if a personnel member was a danger to a vulnerable population.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: February 25, 2025
  • Personnel R9-10-806.A.10
    Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure, for one of six caregivers sampled, before providing assisted living services to a resident, a manager or caregiver provided current documentation of first aid training and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training certification. The deficient practice posed a risk if an employee was unable to meet a resident's needs during an emergency.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: February 25, 2025
  • Service Plans R9-10-808.C.1.g
    Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a caregiver documented the services provided in the resident's medical record, for six of six residents sampled.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: February 27, 2025
  • Medication Services R9-10-816.F.1
    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure that medication was stored in a separate locked room, closet, cabinet, or self-contained unit used only for medication storage.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: February 26, 2025
Show all 9
  • Emergency and Safety Standards R9-10-818.A.4
    Based on documentation review, observation, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a disaster drill for employees was conducted on each shift at least once every three months and documented.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: March 14, 2025
  • Emergency and Safety Standards R9-10-818.A.5.a
    Based on documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure an evacuation drill for employees and residents was conducted at least once every six months.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: April 10, 2025
  • Emergency and Safety Standards R9-10-818.E.5
    Based on documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure documentation of the current fire inspection was maintained.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: March 3, 2025
  • and 1 more in the report

December 27, 2023: compliance (annual) inspection, 4 deficiencies

  • Personnel R9-10-806.A.10
    Based on record review, documentation review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure, before providing assisted living services to a resident, a manager or caregiver provided current documentation of first aid training for two of four caregivers sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk if the employees were unable to meet a resident's needs during an emergency.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: January 1, 2024
  • Medical Records R9-10-811.C.17
    Based on record review, documentation review, observation, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a resident's medical record contained documentation of notification of the resident of the availability of vaccination for pneumonia, according to A.R.S. § 36-406(1)(d) for five of seven residents sampled. This deficient practice posed a potential illness risk to residents.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: January 29, 2024
  • Personal Care Services R9-10-814.F.1-4
    Based on record review, documentation review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a service plan for a resident receiving personal care services included skin maintenance to prevent and treat bruises, injuries, pressure sores, and infections; offering sufficient fluids to maintain hydration; and incontinence care that ensures that a resident maintained the highest practicable level of independence when toileting, for three of three residents sampled receiving personal care services.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: January 22, 2024
  • Directed Care Services R9-10-815.C.1-7
    Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure the service plan for a resident receiving directed care services included the requirements in R9-10-815(C)(1-5), for four of four sampled residents receiving directed care services.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: January 22, 2024

Other inspection reports

  • June 11, 2025: complaint inspection. Read the Statement of Deficiencies on AZ Care Check.

Inspections with no deficiencies listed

  • October 1, 2025: complaint inspection. No deficiencies were found during the on-site investigation of complaint 00146368 conducted on October 1, 2025.
  • July 25, 2025: complaint inspection. No deficiencies were found during the on-site investigation of complaint 00136100 and 00136950 conducted on July 25, 2025.
  • June 5, 2024: complaint inspection. An on-site investigation of complaints AZ00208332, AZ00211087, AZ00211088, were conducted on June 5, 2024, and no deficiencies were cited.
  • March 28, 2024: complaint inspection. An on-site investigation of complaint AZ00205600 was conducted on March 28, 2024, and no deficiencies were cited.

Read the full record on AZ Care Check →

ADHS writes a Statement of Deficiencies after each inspection that finds a rule was not met. The community then files a plan of correction, which ADHS accepts or rejects. ADHS investigates complaints on site. A complaint inspection that ends with “No deficiencies were found” did not find a rule violation; deficiencies cited on a complaint inspection are listed with that inspection. AZ Care Check does not list complaints that did not lead to an on-site inspection. Enforcement cases are actions ADHS takes after an inspection, such as a civil money penalty, a provisional license or a license revocation, with their status. This community is licensed for 100 residents; larger communities are inspected and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Arizona Department of Health Services, Licensing Services, AZ Care Check, data as of October 15, 2026, showing all records on AZ Care Check (back to September 5, 2023). Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.

License and ownershipActive license
License type
Assisted Living Center-Directed
License number
AL8344C
License status
Active
Licensed capacity
100

Source: Arizona state licensing records (agency listing), retrieved 2026-09-09. Licensing status is a matter of public record; it is not a quality rating.

Paying with Medicaid and other programsHow Medicaid pays for care in Arizona, and other programs

How Medicaid pays for care in Arizona

  • Arizona Long Term Care System (ALTCS). Yes. Arizona's Medicaid long-term care program, ALTCS, is for people who need nursing facility level of care. Members do not have to live in a nursing home, and many live in an assisted living facility and get needed services there. (state page)

Ask the community whether it accepts Medicaid.

Location and nearby careNearest hospital 3.3 mi, nursing home 2.5 mi, pharmacy 0.8 mi
Nearest hospital with an emergency room
Banner - University Medical Center Tucson Campus, Tucson. 3.3 miles away, straight line. CMS overall hospital rating: 3 of 5 stars.
Nearest Medicare nursing home
Catalina Post Acute and Rehabilitation, Tucson. 2.5 miles away, straight line.
Nearest home health agency office
Amedisys Home Health Care, Tucson. 0.2 miles away, straight line. Agencies travel to clients, so ask which ones serve this address.
Nearest pharmacy
Walgreens. 0.8 miles away, straight line. From OpenStreetMap, which does not list every pharmacy, so one may be closer.
Area
USDA classes ZIP code 85718 as metropolitan (metropolitan core).
Dialysis within 15 miles
032514 Desert Dialysis Center (Dci), Tucson, 1.3 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 3 of 5 stars)
Davita Tucson Central Dialysis, Tucson, 2.9 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 4 of 5 stars)
032617 Tucson West Dialysis Center (Fmc), Tucson, 3.1 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 4 of 5 stars)
Hospice
32 Medicare hospices tell CMS they serve ZIP code 85718.
Amedisys Hospice, office in Tucson, 0.0 miles away, straight line
Copper State Hospice Inc, office in Tucson, 0.2 miles away, straight line
Emblem Hospice Tucson, office in Tucson, 0.3 miles away, straight line
Nearest geriatric medicine practice
Banner-University Medical Group, Tucson. 0.9 miles away, straight line. 1 geriatric medicine doctor listed there.

Distances are straight lines from the community, not driving distance. Hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors come from CMS provider data (CMS, hospital list updated Jul 22, 2026). Star ratings are CMS’s own.

Emergency and natural hazard riskFEMA overall risk relatively moderate; outside FEMA's high-risk flood areas

Public hazard maps for this location. Ask the community about its emergency plan, its generator and where residents would go in an evacuation.

Flood zone
Outside the high and moderate risk flood areas on FEMA's flood map (Zone X, minimal flood hazard, or not studied). (FEMA flood map)
Wildfire risk to homes
In Catalina Foothills, AZ, risk to homes is greater than 35% of communities in Arizona and 73% of communities nationwide. USDA rates the whole town or city, not this address. (USDA Forest Service, Wildfire Risk to Communities, April 2026)
FEMA National Risk Index
Overall: relatively moderate. By hazard: hurricane very low, inland flooding relatively high, wildfire relatively moderate, tornado very low, heat wave very high, earthquake relatively low. These are FEMA’s ratings for the census tract, compared with tracts nationwide. (FEMA, December 2025)

A flood zone describes the map at this point, not the building's elevation. In an emergency, follow the local emergency management agency.

Questions to ask on a tour10 questions picked for this community from its record

Picked for this community from its record. Ask them in person and write down the answers.

  1. The state recorded a finding in June 2026. What was it, and how was it fixed?
  2. Your published starting price is a base rate. What would the total monthly cost be for my parent's needs?
  3. How much have prices gone up in each of the last three years?
  4. How many caregivers are on duty during the day and at night?
  5. What happens if care needs increase? When would someone need to move?
  6. What fees are charged at move-in?
  7. How do you tell families about falls, illness or changes?
  8. How long have the executive director and the head of care been here?
  9. Who gives medications, and what training do they have?
  10. For what reasons can a resident be asked to leave?
What we checked12 public sources we searched, with dates

Every public source we searched for this community. “Nothing on record” means we found no record that matched it. A record can be missed when a name or address differs.

SourceData as ofWhat we found
Arizona Department of Health Services, Licensing Services inspection recordsOct 15, 2026See above
U.S. Department of Labor wage and hour casesOct 15, 2026Nothing on record
OSHA workplace safety inspections since 2016Oct 15, 2026Nothing on record
FEMA flood mapSee above
USDA wildfire riskApr 15, 2026See above
FEMA National Risk IndexSee above
CMS hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors; OpenStreetMap pharmaciesSee above
HUD Multifamily Properties - AssistedJul 6, 2026Nothing on record
State Veterans Homes (NASVH directory)Sep 20, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Hospice - General InformationAug 19, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Home Health Care AgenciesMay 27, 2026Nothing on record
The community’s own websiteSee above
Common questionsAnswers to 4 questions families ask
What type of care does Atria Campana Del Rio provide?

Atria Campana Del Rio is licensed by the state of Arizona for independent living, assisted living in Tucson, Arizona. Its licensed capacity is 100 residents.

Does Lilisity rate Atria Campana Del Rio?

No. We publish state licensing details for Atria Campana Del Rio but no score, rating, or ranking. Only communities on the Top Communities list or with a Senior Living Alliance Excellence Award, both based on phone-verified resident and family interviews, are ranked.

How much does Atria Campana Del Rio cost?

Assisted Living in Arizona typically starts at $3,450 to $5,250 a month. Based on 88 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price. The starting prices it publishes are in the Prices section on this page.

How do I contact Atria Campana Del Rio?

Use Atria Campana Del Rio's website, atriaseniorliving.com/retirement-communities/atria-campana-del-rio-tucson-az, or visit at 1550 and 1580 East River Road, Tucson, AZ 85718.

Choosing assisted livingOur care guide: what to look for, what it costs, how families pay, and more questions to ask (PDF)

Report a wrong fact

How Lilisity works. The only scores or rankings Lilisity publishes are the Top Communities list and the Excellence Awards, both built from phone-verified resident and family interviews. Communities can pay Lilisity a flat monthly fee to manage their own listing: photos, prices, contact details, and receiving the inquiries families choose to send them. The fee is the same no matter how many families contact them or move in. Senior Living Alliance, which runs Lilisity, offers the same listing to its member communities as part of their membership; members pay SLA for its resident and family interview program. No community pays Lilisity per inquiry, per referral or per move-in. Payment never changes a testimonial, a rating, or the order of search results. The "Nearby Senior Living Alliance communities" box shows member communities only. How we verify testimonials · How we are paid