Lilisity

Assisted Living and Memory Care

Madison Heights

108 Chaney Street, Enterprise, AL 36330 · Map
Licensed for 16 residents

State license active
Is this your community? Claim this listing

Madison Heights is a state-licensed assisted living, memory care community in Enterprise, Alabama. It is licensed for 16 residents. Lilisity publishes no score or ranking for this community; the details below come from the state licensing record.

Assisted LivingAlso memory care
16 residentsLicensed capacity
State licensedSpecialty care assisted living facility (regular)
$4,000 to $8,300/moTypical assisted living start in Alabama, from 24 communities that publish prices

Prices

This community does not publish its prices.

Area costs

Assisted Living in Alabama typically starts at $4,000 to $8,300 a month. Based on 24 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price.

Lilisity’s independent report

What the public record shows

Gathered by Lilisity from state and federal sources. Communities can’t edit this part of the page.

State inspections

27Deficiencies cited
5Substantiated complaints

Last survey posted: Sep 20, 2023. See the record

License

Active, 16 residents

Specialty Care Assisted Living Facility (Regular) P1602.

Nearest emergency room

0.8 miles

Medical Center Enterprise, rated 4 of 5 stars by CMS.

Side by side with nearby communities

The 4 nearest communities that offer assisted living, by straight-line distance. Prices are starting prices each community publishes; we never show estimates.

CommunityDistanceLicensed capacityPublished starting priceLicenseInspection citations
Madison Heights this community16Not publishedActive27 deficiencies, 5 substantiated complaints
Kelley Place0.1 mi16Not publishedActive25 deficiencies, 4 substantiated complaints
Serenity South Enterprise Senior Living II1.4 mi16Not publishedActive10 deficiencies, 0 substantiated complaints
Serenity South Enterprise Senior Living I1.4 mi16Not publishedActive11 deficiencies, 0 substantiated complaints
Providence Home10.7 mi16Not publishedActive5 deficiencies, 0 substantiated complaints
State inspection record27 deficiencies, 5 substantiated complaints
License status
Regular
Last survey posted
September 20, 2023
Surveys posted
2
Deficiencies cited
27
Substantiated complaints
5

Surveys

  • September 20, 2023 (Follow Up): 6 deficiencies cited report plan of correction
    The deficient practices resulted in the potential for harm to all residents and require a plan of correction.
    • Personnel: Training. ADPH found: “The facility failed to provide required special needs training for staff.” 420-5-20-.04(9)
    • Records and Reports: Residents' Rights. ADPH found: “The facility failed to maintain personal dignity and privacy for every resident at all times.” 420-5-20-.05(3)(d)
    • Care of Residents: Medical Direction and Supervision. ADPH found: “The facility failed to ensure the physician's order was followed for the administration of oxygen for Resident Identifier (RI)#3.” 420-5-20-.06(1)
    • Care of Residents: Personal Care and Services. ADPH found: “The facility failed to ensure the Plan of Care included goals and interventions for management of RI#3's oxygen, to include interventions for monitoring the flow rate and function of the oxygen.” 420-5-20-.06(4)(a)(b)
    • Care of Residents: Activity Program. ADPH found: “The facility failed to develop a specific activity program to meet the needs of a resident who had wandering behaviors.” 420-5-20-.06(4)(c)(d)(e)(f)
    • Care of Residents: Medications. ADPH found: “The facility failed to ensure a physician's order was in place for RI#3's self-administration of his/her oxygen.” 420-5-20-.06(5)(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)
  • March 3, 2022 (Licensure/Complaint): 21 deficiencies cited, 5 complaints substantiated, 1 complaint unsubstantiated report plan of correction
    The deficient practices resulted in actual harm for at least three (3) residents (RI#1, RI#5, and RI#6) and placed the remaining nine (9) residents at risk for significant harm.
    • Administration: The Specialty Care Assisted Living Facility Governing Authority. ADPH found: “The governing authority failed to adequately oversee the administrator to ensure the facility operated in compliance with the SBOH rules for specialty care assisted living facilities (SCALF).” Cited as a result of a complaint investigation. 420-5-20-.03(1)(a)(b)(c)(d)
    • Administration. ADPH found: “The facility failed to develop, update or implement policies and procedures for medication management, health assessments, care plans, and admission, retention, and continued stay criteria.” This deficient practice resulted in harm for three (3) residents (RI#1, RI#5, and RI#6). 420-5-20-.03(e)
    • Administration: Responsibility. ADPH found: “The administrator failed to perform his duties to ensure the care and safety needs of all residents were met.” This deficient practice resulted in harm for at least three (3) residents (RI#1, RI#5, and RI#6). Cited as a result of a complaint investigation. 420-5-20-.03(2)(a)
    • Personnel. ADPH found: “The facility failed to provide the minimum number of required employees 24 hours a day seven (7) days a week.” Cited as a result of a complaint investigation. 420-5-20-.04(1)(2)
    • Personnel: Medical Director. ADPH found: “The RN/Care Coordinator failed to perform the required duties to ensure every residents' care needs were met.” This deficient practice resulted in actual harm for at least three (3) residents (RI#1, RI#5, and RI#6) and placed the remaining nine (9) residents living in the facility at risk for significant harm. Cited as a result of a complaint investigation. 420-5-20-.04(6)(7)(8)
    Show all 21
    • Personnel: Training. ADPH found: “The facility failed to identify and provide employees with adequate training to meet the needs of residents with dementia symptoms.” This deficient practice affected all 12 residents living in the facility and placed the residents at risk for significant harm. Cited as a result of a complaint investigation. 420-5-20-.04(9)
    • Records and Reports: Residents' Rights. ADPH found: “The facility failed to provide a safe and decent environment for all residents.” This deficient practice resulted in actual harm for three (3) residents (RI#1, RI#5, and RI#6) and placed the remaining nine (9) residents at risk for significant harm. Cited as a result of a complaint investigation. 420-5-20-.05(3)(d)
    • Records and Reports: Incident Investigation. ADPH found: “The facility failed to report at least one resident who tested positive for Covid and also failed to report a resident incident with injuries.” This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 12 residents living in the facility. 420-5-20-.05(3)(h)
    • Care of Residents: Medical Direction and Supervision. ADPH found: “The facility failed to follow physician medication orders for management of a resident's medical symptoms.” This deficient practice resulted in actual harm for RI#5 and placed the remaining 11 residents at risk for significant harm. 420-5-20-.06(1)
    • Care of Residents: Initial Assessment. ADPH found: “The facility failed to provide adequate health supervision to identify and address resident health status changes.” This deficient practice resulted in actual harm for at least two (2) residents (RI#1 and RI#5) and placed the remaining 9 residents at risk for significant harm. 420-5-20-.06(3)(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)
    • Care of Residents: Observation. ADPH found: “EI#3, RN, did not accurately assess residents to identify combative behaviors and significant changes in health status.” This deficient practice resulted in actual harm for RI#1 and placed the remaining 11 residents at risk for significant harm. 420-5-20-.06(3)(f)
    • Care of Residents: Services Beyond Capability of Specialty Care Assisted Living Facility. ADPH found: “The facility readmitted a resident who had care and safety needs which exceeded the facility's admission criteria.” This deficient practice resulted in actual harm for RI#6 as evidence by RI#6's symptoms of pain and anxiety. Cited as a result of a complaint investigation. 420-5-20-.06(3)(g)
    • Care of Residents: Personal Care and Services. ADPH found: “EI#3, RN, failed to accurately assess residents to identify combative behaviors and significant changes in health status.” This deficient practice resulted in actual harm for RI#1 and placed the remaining 11 residents at risk for significant harm. Cited as a result of a complaint investigation. 420-5-20-.06(4)(a)(b)
    • Care of Residents: Activity Program. ADPH found: “The facility failed to provide an appropriate activity program to prevent or deter wandering behaviors while also promoting mental and physical wellness.” This deficient practice affected all 12 residents living in the facility. Cited as a result of a complaint investigation. 420-5-20-.06(4)(c)(d)(e)(f)
    • Care of Residents: Medications. ADPH found: “The facility failed to ensure resident medications were only administered by a nurse or physician.” This deficient practice affected six residents and placed the remaining six (6) residents at risk for significant harm. 420-5-20-.06(5)(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)
    • Care of Residents: Medications. ADPH found: “The facility failed to ensure nurses contemporaneously recorded all medications administered to residents.” 420-5-20-.06(5)(h)
    • Care of Residents: Medications. ADPH found: “The facility failed to properly manage all resident medications under the facility's custody.” This deficiency had the potential to affect all 12 residents living in the facility. Cited as a result of a complaint investigation. 420-5-20-.06(5)(i)(j)(k)(l)(m)
    • Care of Residents: Retention. ADPH found: “The administrator retained residents who were ineligible for retention or continued stay.” This deficient practice resulted in harm to at least three (3) residents ( RI#1, RI#2, and RI#6), and placed the remaining nine (9) residents at risk for significant harm. Cited as a result of a complaint investigation. 420-5-20-.06(9)(b)
    • Physical Facilities: Recreational. ADPH found: “The facility failed to ensure the furniture in the common living room was maintained in good repair so that it could be properly cleaned.” This deficient practice affected all 12 residents living in the facility. 420-5-20-.08(5)
    • Sanitation and Housekeeping: Housekeeping and Physical Plant Maintenance. ADPH found: “The facility failed to ensure all poisons and chemicals were properly secured or supervised at all times.” This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 12 residents. 420-5-20-.10(2)
    • Physical Environment: Building Requirements - Group Specialty Care Assisted Living Facilities. ADPH found: “The facility failed to properly maintain doors mounted in smoke barriers to be smoke resistive and close upon activation of the fire alarm.” This deficient practice placed all 12 residents at significant risk for harm in the event of fire. 420-5-20-.12(6)

ADPH also lists 1 earlier survey, back to 2018.

Search ADPH’s deficiency reports for license P1602 →

ADPH posts each survey’s Statement of Deficiencies as a PDF (older ones are scans, which we read by OCR). From each report we show the deficiency tags, the rules they cite, ADPH’s own one-sentence finding and the complaint outcomes ADPH states; each cited rule is named in the rule’s own words (Alabama Administrative Code, chapter 420-5-4 for assisted living and 420-5-20 for specialty care assisted living). The report, and the facility’s plan of correction when ADPH posts it, are the official record. Some reports list a complaint as substantiated with no deficiency cited; we show both as ADPH wrote them. This community is licensed for 16 residents; larger communities are inspected and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Alabama Department of Public Health, Bureau of Health Provider Standards, data as of October 15, 2026, showing surveys from the last five years. Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.

License and ownershipActive license
License type
Specialty Care Assisted Living Facility (Regular)
License number
P1602
License status
Active
Licensed capacity
16
Executive Director
Jazmyn Frazier

Source: Alabama state licensing records (agency listing), retrieved 2026-09-09. Licensing status is a matter of public record; it is not a quality rating.

Executive Director name from public records we reviewed, as of Oct 12, 2026.

Location and nearby careNearest hospital 0.8 mi, nursing home 2.2 mi, pharmacy 1.7 mi
Nearest hospital with an emergency room
Medical Center Enterprise, Enterprise. 0.8 miles away, straight line. CMS overall hospital rating: 4 of 5 stars.
Nearest Medicare nursing home
Enterprise Health & Rehabilitation Center, Enterprise. 2.2 miles away, straight line.
Nearest home health agency office
Southeast Alabama Homecare, Enterprise. 1.5 miles away, straight line. Agencies travel to clients, so ask which ones serve this address.
Nearest pharmacy
Rite Aid. 1.7 miles away, straight line. From OpenStreetMap, which does not list every pharmacy, so one may be closer.
Area
USDA classes ZIP code 36330 as micropolitan (micropolitan core).
Dialysis within 15 miles
Dci Enterprise, Enterprise, 2.3 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 3 of 5 stars)
Davita Enterprise Dialysis, Enterprise, 2.7 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 4 of 5 stars)
Hospice
10 Medicare hospices tell CMS they serve ZIP code 36330.
Acg Hospice-Enterprise, office in Enterprise, 1.2 miles away, straight line
Dayspring Hospice, LLC, office in Enterprise, 1.5 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 5 of 5 stars)
Gentiva, office in Enterprise, 2.2 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 4 of 5 stars)
Nearest geriatric medicine practice
Gerination Medical Centers LLC, Auburn. 89.8 miles away, straight line. 1 geriatric medicine doctor listed there.

Distances are straight lines from the community, not driving distance. Hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors come from CMS provider data (CMS, hospital list updated Jul 22, 2026). Star ratings are CMS’s own.

Emergency and natural hazard riskFEMA overall risk relatively moderate; outside FEMA's high-risk flood areas

Public hazard maps for this location. Ask the community about its emergency plan, its generator and where residents would go in an evacuation.

Flood zone
Outside the high and moderate risk flood areas on FEMA's flood map (Zone X, minimal flood hazard, or not studied). (FEMA flood map)
FEMA National Risk Index
Overall: relatively moderate. By hazard: hurricane relatively high, inland flooding relatively moderate, wildfire very low, tornado relatively high, heat wave relatively low, earthquake relatively low. These are FEMA’s ratings for the census tract, compared with tracts nationwide. (FEMA, December 2025)

A flood zone describes the map at this point, not the building's elevation. In an emergency, follow the local emergency management agency.

Questions to ask on a tour10 questions picked for this community from its record

Picked for this community from its record. Ask them in person and write down the answers.

  1. What does the base rate include, and when did rates last go up?
  2. How many caregivers work in memory care during the day, the evening and overnight, and for how many residents?
  3. What dementia training does each caregiver get before working alone, and every year after?
  4. How do staff respond when a resident is agitated, frightened or tries to leave?
  5. How many caregivers are on duty during the day and at night?
  6. What happens if care needs increase? When would someone need to move?
  7. What fees are charged at move-in?
  8. How do you tell families about falls, illness or changes?
  9. How long have the executive director and the head of care been here?
  10. Who gives medications, and what training do they have?
What we checked12 public sources we searched, with dates

Every public source we searched for this community. “Nothing on record” means we found no record that matched it. A record can be missed when a name or address differs.

SourceData as ofWhat we found
Alabama Department of Public Health, Bureau of Health Provider Standards inspection recordsOct 15, 2026See above
U.S. Department of Labor wage and hour casesOct 15, 2026Nothing on record
OSHA workplace safety inspections since 2016Oct 15, 2026Nothing on record
FEMA flood mapSee above
USDA wildfire riskApr 15, 2026Not shown: FEMA rates wildfire risk here very low
FEMA National Risk IndexSee above
CMS hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors; OpenStreetMap pharmaciesSee above
HUD Multifamily Properties - AssistedJul 6, 2026Nothing on record
State Veterans Homes (NASVH directory)Sep 20, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Hospice - General InformationAug 19, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Home Health Care AgenciesMay 27, 2026Nothing on record
The community’s own websiteNo plain statements of services found
Common questionsAnswers to 4 questions families ask
What type of care does Madison Heights provide?

Madison Heights is licensed by the state of Alabama for assisted living, memory care in Enterprise, Alabama. Its licensed capacity is 16 residents.

Does Lilisity rate Madison Heights?

No. We publish state licensing details for Madison Heights but no score, rating, or ranking. Only communities on the Top Communities list or with a Senior Living Alliance Excellence Award, both based on phone-verified resident and family interviews, are ranked.

How much does Madison Heights cost?

Assisted Living in Alabama typically starts at $4,000 to $8,300 a month. Based on 24 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price. Madison Heights does not publish its prices.

How do I contact Madison Heights?

Use Madison Heights's website, atlasseniorliving.com/madison-heights-enterprise, or visit at 108 Chaney Street, Enterprise, AL 36330.

Choosing assisted livingOur care guide: what to look for, what it costs, how families pay, and more questions to ask (PDF)

Report a wrong fact

How Lilisity works. The only scores or rankings Lilisity publishes are the Top Communities list and the Excellence Awards, both built from phone-verified resident and family interviews. Communities can pay Lilisity a flat monthly fee to manage their own listing: photos, prices, contact details, and receiving the inquiries families choose to send them. The fee is the same no matter how many families contact them or move in. Senior Living Alliance, which runs Lilisity, offers the same listing to its member communities as part of their membership; members pay SLA for its resident and family interview program. No community pays Lilisity per inquiry, per referral or per move-in. Payment never changes a testimonial, a rating, or the order of search results. The "Nearby Senior Living Alliance communities" box shows member communities only. How we verify testimonials · How we are paid