Lilisity

Assisted Living and Memory Care

Kelley Place

109 Chaney Drive, PO Box 310845, Enterprise, AL 36331 · Map
Licensed for 16 residents

State license active
Is this your community? Claim this listing

Kelley Place is a state-licensed assisted living, memory care community in Enterprise, Alabama. It is licensed for 16 residents. Lilisity publishes no score or ranking for this community; the details below come from the state licensing record.

Assisted LivingAlso memory care
16 residentsLicensed capacity
State licensedSpecialty care assisted living facility (regular)
$4,000 to $8,300/moTypical assisted living start in Alabama, from 24 communities that publish prices

Prices

This community does not publish its prices.

Area costs

Assisted Living in Alabama typically starts at $4,000 to $8,300 a month. Based on 24 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price.

Lilisity’s independent report

What the public record shows

Gathered by Lilisity from state and federal sources. Communities can’t edit this part of the page.

State inspections

25Deficiencies cited
4Substantiated complaints

Last survey posted: Sep 20, 2023. See the record

License

Active, 16 residents

Specialty Care Assisted Living Facility (Regular) P1601.

Nearest emergency room

0.9 miles

Medical Center Enterprise, rated 4 of 5 stars by CMS.

Side by side with nearby communities

The 4 nearest communities that offer assisted living, by straight-line distance. Prices are starting prices each community publishes; we never show estimates.

CommunityDistanceLicensed capacityPublished starting priceLicenseInspection citations
Kelley Place this community16Not publishedActive25 deficiencies, 4 substantiated complaints
Madison Heights0.1 mi16Not publishedActive27 deficiencies, 5 substantiated complaints
Serenity South Enterprise Senior Living II1.4 mi16Not publishedActive10 deficiencies, 0 substantiated complaints
Serenity South Enterprise Senior Living I1.4 mi16Not publishedActive11 deficiencies, 0 substantiated complaints
Providence Home10.7 mi16Not publishedActive5 deficiencies, 0 substantiated complaints
State inspection record25 deficiencies, 4 substantiated complaints
License status
Regular
Last survey posted
September 20, 2023
Surveys posted
2
Deficiencies cited
25
Substantiated complaints
4

Surveys

  • September 20, 2023 (Licensure/Complaint): 3 deficiencies cited, 1 complaint investigated (outcome in the report) report plan of correction
    The deficient practices resulted in the potential for harm to all residents and require a plan of correction.
    • Personnel: Training. ADPH found: “The facility failed to provide required special needs training for staff.” 420-5-20-.04(9)
    • Records and Reports: Residents' Rights. ADPH found: “The facility failed to maintain personal dignity and privacy for every resident at all times.” 420-5-20-.05(3)(d)
    • Physical Environment: Additional Requirements for Specialty Care Assisted Living Facilities. ADPH found: “The gate leading from the fenced area to the public way was not readily unlockable from either side.” 420-5-20-.12(8)
  • March 3, 2022 (Licensure/Complaint): 22 deficiencies cited, 4 complaints substantiated, 2 complaints unsubstantiated report plan of correction
    • Administration: The Specialty Care Assisted Living Facility Governing Authority. ADPH found: “The governing authority failed to adequately oversee the administrator to ensure the facility operated in compliance with the SBOH rules for specialty care assisted living facilities (SCALF).” Cited as a result of a complaint investigation. 420-5-20-.03(1)(a)(b)(c)(d)
    • Administration. ADPH found: “The facility failed to implement and staff failed to follow policies and procedures for abuse of residents, medication storage, health assessments, care plans and admission, retention, and continued stay criteria.” This deficient practice resulted in actual harm for seven (7) residents, three (3) residents had been discharged prior to the survey. 420-5-20-.03(e)
    • Administration: Responsibility. ADPH found: “The administrator failed to perform his duties to ensure the care and safety needs of all residents were met.” This deficient practice resulted in actual harm for at least seven (7) residents (three residents RI#11, RI#12, and RI#13 had been discharged prior to the survey). 420-5-20-.03(2)(a)
    • Personnel. ADPH found: “The facility failed to provide the minimum number of required employees 24 hours a day seven (7) days a week.” This deficient practice resulted in actual harm for at least seven (7) residents [three residents (RI#11, RI#12, and RI#13) had been discharged prior to the survey] and placed the remaining nine (9) residents at significant risk for harm. 420-5-20-.04(1)(2)
    • Personnel: Medical Director. ADPH found: “The RN/Care Coordinator, failed to perform required duties to ensure each resident's care needs were met.” This deficient practice resulted in actual harm for at least seven (7) residents, three of the seven resident had been discharged prior to the survey. 420-5-20-.04(6)(7)(8)
    Show all 22
    • Personnel: Training. ADPH found: “The facility failed to identify and provide employees with adequate training to meet the needs of the residents with dementia symptoms.” 420-5-20-.04(9)
    • Records and Reports: Residents' Rights. ADPH found: “The facility failed to ensure the rights of every resident were honored and protected including the right to a safe and decent environment free from abuse, neglect, and isolation.” 420-5-20-.05(3)(d)
    • Records and Reports: Incident Investigation. ADPH found: “The facility failed to complete a thorough investigation for an injury of unknown origin.” This deficient practice resulted in harm for at least three (3) residents and placed the remaining 10 residents at risk for significant harm. 420-5-20-.05(3)(h)
    • Care of Residents: Initial Physical Examination. ADPH found: “The facility failed to ensure initial physician medical exams were completed with all required components.” This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 13 residents living in the facility. 420-5-20-.06(2)(a)(b)(c)
    • Care of Residents: Initial Assessment. ADPH found: “The RN failed to accurately assess, document, and manage resident behaviors.” This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 13 residents in the facility. 420-5-20-.06(3)(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)
    • Care of Residents: Observation. ADPH found: “The facility failed to ensure that residents who required a higher level of care received the assistance to obtain the necessary services.” This deficient practice resulted in actual harm for at least four (4) residents (two residents had been discharged at the time of the survey). 420-5-20-.06(3)(f)
    • Care of Residents: Services Beyond Capability of Specialty Care Assisted Living Facility. ADPH found: “The facility failed to transfer or discharge residents who required a higher level of care to an appropriate setting.” This deficient practice resulted in actual harm for at least seven (7) residents (RI#1, RI#2, RI#3, RI#5, RI#11, RI#12, and RI#13) (three residents RI#11, RI#12, and RI#13 had been discharged prior to the survey). 420-5-20-.06(3)(g)
    • Care of Residents: Resident Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation. ADPH found: “The facility failed to implement and follow the facility's abuse policy and procedures.” This deficient practice resulted in actual harm for at least seven (7) residents [RI#1, RI#2, RI#3, RI#5, RI#11, RI#12, and RI#13 (RI#11, RI#12, and RI#13 had been discharged prior to the survey). 420-5-20-.06(3)(k)
    • Care of Residents: Personal Care and Services. ADPH found: “The RN failed to develop individualized care plans, update care plans with significant changes in the residents health status, and evaluate whether or not care plan interventions were effective.” This deficient practice affected all 13 residents living in the facility. 420-5-20-.06(4)(a)(b)
    • Care of Residents: Activity Program. ADPH found: “The facility failed to provide an appropriate activity program that promoted mental and physical wellness.” This deficient practice affected all 13 residents living in the facility. 420-5-20-.06(4)(c)(d)(e)(f)
    • Care of Residents: Medications. ADPH found: “The nurse failed to contemporaneously document medications on the resident's medication administration record.” This deficient practice affected at least two (2) residents. 420-5-20-.06(5)(h)
    • Care of Residents: Medications. ADPH found: “The facility failed to ensure medications kept in the custody of the facility were properly secured and stored at all times.” This deficient practice affected all 13 residents living in the facility. 420-5-20-.06(5)(i)(j)(k)(l)(m)
    • Care of Residents: Retention. ADPH found: “The facility retained residents whose care and safety needs exceeded the capabilities of the facility license.” This deficient practice resulted in harm to at least seven (7) residents (three of the seven residents had been discharged prior to the survey), and placed the other nine (9) residents at risk for significant harm. 420-5-20-.06(9)(b)
    • Physical Facilities: Food Service Facilities. ADPH found: “The facility failed to maintain wooden tables and chairs, located in the dining area, in good repair.” This deficient practice placed all 13 residents at risk for harm from food borne illness. 420-5-20-.08(4)
    • Physical Facilities: Recreational. ADPH found: “The facility failed to maintain the common living room furniture in good repair.” This deficient practice affected all 13 residents living in the facility. 420-5-20-.08(5)
    • Sanitation and Housekeeping: Housekeeping and Physical Plant Maintenance. ADPH found: “The facility failed to have adequate housekeeping and maintenance services to maintain a safe and sanitary environment for all residents.” This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 13 residents living in the facility. 420-5-20-.10(2)
    • Physical Environment: General Building Requirements - Group and Congregate. ADPH found: “The facility failed to maintain the building and equipment in good repair.” This deficient practice affected all 13 residents living in the facility. 420-5-20-.12(5)

ADPH also lists 8 earlier surveys, back to 2010.

Search ADPH’s deficiency reports for license P1601 →

ADPH posts each survey’s Statement of Deficiencies as a PDF (older ones are scans, which we read by OCR). From each report we show the deficiency tags, the rules they cite, ADPH’s own one-sentence finding and the complaint outcomes ADPH states; each cited rule is named in the rule’s own words (Alabama Administrative Code, chapter 420-5-4 for assisted living and 420-5-20 for specialty care assisted living). The report, and the facility’s plan of correction when ADPH posts it, are the official record. Some reports list a complaint as substantiated with no deficiency cited; we show both as ADPH wrote them. This community is licensed for 16 residents; larger communities are inspected and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Alabama Department of Public Health, Bureau of Health Provider Standards, data as of October 15, 2026, showing surveys from the last five years. Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.

License and ownershipActive license
License type
Specialty Care Assisted Living Facility (Regular)
License number
P1601
License status
Active
Licensed capacity
16
Executive Director
Jazmyn Frazier

Source: Alabama state licensing records (agency listing), retrieved 2026-09-09. Licensing status is a matter of public record; it is not a quality rating.

Executive Director name from public records we reviewed, as of Oct 12, 2026.

Staff pay and workplace safety1 federal wage case, no violations found

Federal records about how the employer here treats its staff.

Federal wage and hour cases

The Department of Labor checks that staff are paid minimum wage and overtime as the law requires.

DOL also concluded 1 case here with no violations found, most recently for a period ending Sep 5, 2017.

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Wage and Hour Division enforcement data, loaded Oct 15, 2026. Concluded cases only. The dates are the period in which DOL found violations, not when the case opened or closed. Back wages are what the employer agreed to pay; penalties are what DOL assessed. DOL does not publish a page for each case, so search the dataset by case number.

Location and nearby careNearest hospital 0.9 mi, nursing home 2.3 mi, pharmacy 1.7 mi
Nearest hospital with an emergency room
Medical Center Enterprise, Enterprise. 0.9 miles away, straight line. CMS overall hospital rating: 4 of 5 stars.
Nearest Medicare nursing home
Enterprise Health & Rehabilitation Center, Enterprise. 2.3 miles away, straight line.
Nearest home health agency office
Southeast Alabama Homecare, Enterprise. 1.5 miles away, straight line. Agencies travel to clients, so ask which ones serve this address.
Nearest pharmacy
Rite Aid. 1.7 miles away, straight line. From OpenStreetMap, which does not list every pharmacy, so one may be closer.
Area
USDA classes ZIP code 36331 as micropolitan (micropolitan core).
Dialysis within 15 miles
Dci Enterprise, Enterprise, 2.2 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 3 of 5 stars)
Davita Enterprise Dialysis, Enterprise, 2.8 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 4 of 5 stars)
Nearest geriatric medicine practice
Gerination Medical Centers LLC, Auburn. 89.7 miles away, straight line. 1 geriatric medicine doctor listed there.

Distances are straight lines from the community, not driving distance. Hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors come from CMS provider data (CMS, hospital list updated Jul 22, 2026). Star ratings are CMS’s own.

Emergency and natural hazard riskFEMA overall risk relatively moderate; outside FEMA's high-risk flood areas

Public hazard maps for this location. Ask the community about its emergency plan, its generator and where residents would go in an evacuation.

Flood zone
Outside the high and moderate risk flood areas on FEMA's flood map (Zone X, minimal flood hazard, or not studied). (FEMA flood map)
FEMA National Risk Index
Overall: relatively moderate. By hazard: hurricane relatively high, inland flooding relatively moderate, wildfire very low, tornado relatively high, heat wave relatively low, earthquake relatively low. These are FEMA’s ratings for the census tract, compared with tracts nationwide. (FEMA, December 2025)

A flood zone describes the map at this point, not the building's elevation. In an emergency, follow the local emergency management agency.

Questions to ask on a tour10 questions picked for this community from its record

Picked for this community from its record. Ask them in person and write down the answers.

  1. What does the base rate include, and when did rates last go up?
  2. How many caregivers work in memory care during the day, the evening and overnight, and for how many residents?
  3. What dementia training does each caregiver get before working alone, and every year after?
  4. How do staff respond when a resident is agitated, frightened or tries to leave?
  5. How many caregivers are on duty during the day and at night?
  6. What happens if care needs increase? When would someone need to move?
  7. What fees are charged at move-in?
  8. How do you tell families about falls, illness or changes?
  9. How long have the executive director and the head of care been here?
  10. Who gives medications, and what training do they have?
What we checked12 public sources we searched, with dates

Every public source we searched for this community. “Nothing on record” means we found no record that matched it. A record can be missed when a name or address differs.

SourceData as ofWhat we found
Alabama Department of Public Health, Bureau of Health Provider Standards inspection recordsOct 15, 2026See above
U.S. Department of Labor wage and hour casesOct 15, 2026See above
OSHA workplace safety inspections since 2016Oct 15, 2026Nothing on record
FEMA flood mapSee above
USDA wildfire riskApr 15, 2026Not shown: FEMA rates wildfire risk here very low
FEMA National Risk IndexSee above
CMS hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors; OpenStreetMap pharmaciesSee above
HUD Multifamily Properties - AssistedJul 6, 2026Nothing on record
State Veterans Homes (NASVH directory)Sep 20, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Hospice - General InformationAug 19, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Home Health Care AgenciesMay 27, 2026Nothing on record
The community’s own websiteNo plain statements of services found
Common questionsAnswers to 4 questions families ask
What type of care does Kelley Place provide?

Kelley Place is licensed by the state of Alabama for assisted living, memory care in Enterprise, Alabama. Its licensed capacity is 16 residents.

Does Lilisity rate Kelley Place?

No. We publish state licensing details for Kelley Place but no score, rating, or ranking. Only communities on the Top Communities list or with a Senior Living Alliance Excellence Award, both based on phone-verified resident and family interviews, are ranked.

How much does Kelley Place cost?

Assisted Living in Alabama typically starts at $4,000 to $8,300 a month. Based on 24 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price. Kelley Place does not publish its prices.

How do I contact Kelley Place?

Use Kelley Place's website, atlasseniorliving.com/madison-heights-enterprise, or visit at 109 Chaney Drive, PO Box 310845, Enterprise, AL 36331.

Choosing assisted livingOur care guide: what to look for, what it costs, how families pay, and more questions to ask (PDF)

Report a wrong fact

How Lilisity works. The only scores or rankings Lilisity publishes are the Top Communities list and the Excellence Awards, both built from phone-verified resident and family interviews. Communities can pay Lilisity a flat monthly fee to manage their own listing: photos, prices, contact details, and receiving the inquiries families choose to send them. The fee is the same no matter how many families contact them or move in. Senior Living Alliance, which runs Lilisity, offers the same listing to its member communities as part of their membership; members pay SLA for its resident and family interview program. No community pays Lilisity per inquiry, per referral or per move-in. Payment never changes a testimonial, a rating, or the order of search results. The "Nearby Senior Living Alliance communities" box shows member communities only. How we verify testimonials · How we are paid