Liberty Village

Last survey

August 19, 2026 complaint

Surveys

5

Deficiencies cited

24

Enforcement letters

4

Forfeitures imposed

$7,500 4 notices

Complaints substantiated

6 of 13 as stated in the reports

Enforcement

• September 28, 2026: notice of violation, order to comply, special orders, forfeiture, forfeiture $3,900 (reduced to $2,535 if paid within ten days)
• July 30, 2026: notice of violation, order to comply, special orders, forfeiture, forfeiture $1,100 (reduced to $715 if paid within ten days)
• January 29, 2026: notice of violation, order to comply, special orders, forfeiture, forfeiture $2,200 (reduced to $1,430 if paid within ten days)
• November 15, 2024: notice of violation, order to comply, forfeiture, forfeiture $300 (reduced to $195 if paid within ten days)

August 19, 2026, complaint 1 of 2 complaints substantiated · statement of deficiency

• Pre-admission and ongoing assessments (DHS 83.35(1)(a)) Assessment, individual service plan and evaluations
  From the report: Based on record review and interview, the provider did not ensure Resident 1 was assessed when his/her needs, condition and abilities changed.
• Service plans updated annually or on changes (DHS 83.35(3)(d)) Assessment, individual service plan and evaluations
  From the report: Based on record review and interview, the provider did not ensure Resident 1's individual service plan (ISP) was reviewed and revised when there was a change in Resident 1's needs, abilities, physical and mental condition.
• Behavior management (DHS 83.38(1)(i)) Program services
  From the report: Based on interview and record review, the provider did not ensure services were provided to manage residents' behaviors.

May 6, 2026, complaint, verification visit 1 of 3 complaints substantiated · statement of deficiency

• Caregiver: Investigating abuse & neglect (DHS 83.12(2)(a)) Investigation, notification, and reporting requirements
  From the report: Based on record review and interview, the provider did not report an incident to the department within 7 days from the date the community-based residential facility (CBRF) knew or should have known about employee misconduct.
• Licensee ensures facility complies with laws (DHS 83.14(2)(a)) Licensee
  From the report: Based on record review and interview, the licensee did not ensure the provider, and its operation complied with all laws governing the facility.
• Resident care staff at least 18 years old (DHS 83.16(2)) Employee
  From the report: Based on record review and interview, the provider did not ensure each resident care staff was at least 18 years old.
• Employees screened for communicable disease (DHS 83.17(2)(a)) Hiring and employment
  From the report: Based on record review and interview, the provider did not ensure 3 of 3 employees reviewed had obtained documentation from a physician, physician assistant, clinical nurse practitioner, or a licensed registered nurse, indicating they had been screened within 90 days before the start of employment for clinically apparent communicable disease, including tuberculosis (TB).
• Rights of Residents: Self-determination (DHS 83.32(3)(k)) Rights of residents
  From the report: Based on record review and interview, the provider did not ensure Resident 1's right to self-determination was respected.

December 2, 2025, standard survey, complaint 3 of 6 complaints substantiated · statement of deficiency

• Licensee conduct caregiver background check (DHS 83.17(1)) Hiring and employment
  From the report: Based on record review and interview, the provider did not complete a caregiver background check (CBC) for 2 of 5 staff sampled (Caregiver E and Caregiver F).
• Employees screened for communicable disease (DHS 83.17(2)(a)) Hiring and employment
  From the report: Based on record review and interview, the provider did not ensure 4 of 5 employees reviewed had obtained documentation from a physician, physician assistant, clinical nurse practitioner, or a licensed registered nurse, indicating they had been screened within 90 days before the start of employment for clinically apparent communicable disease, including tuberculosis (TB).
• Orientation (DHS 83.19) Orientation
  From the report: Based on record review and interview, the provider did not provide 2 of 5 (Caregiver F and Caregiver G) caregivers reviewed with orientation training, including: prevention and reporting of resident abuse, neglect and misappropriation of resident property, emergency and disaster plan and evacuation procedures, Community Based Residential Facility policies and procedures, and recognizing and responding to resident changes of condition.
• Admission agreement include services, charges (DHS 83.29(2)) Admission agreement
  From the report: Based on record review and interview, the provider did not ensure 1 of 3 residents admitted had a signed and dated admission agreement completed at the time of admission.
• Involuntary discharge notice requirements (DHS 83.31(4)(c)) Discharge or transfer
  From the report: Based on record review and interview, the provider did not provide an involuntary discharge notice to Resident 2 that included the following requirements: a statement indicating the resident may ask for Department review, the contact information for the regional office's director, or the contact information for the regional office ombudsman program.

January 30, 2025, complaint, verification visit 0 of 1 complaints substantiated · statement of deficiency

• No deficiencies listed in the statement

Read the survey history on DQA’s Provider Search →

DQA posts surveys from the last three years. DHS says posting may be delayed and Provider Search is updated weekly. This community is licensed for 22 residents; larger communities are surveyed and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Wisconsin Department of Health Services, Division of Quality Assurance, data as of October 15, 2026. Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.