Lilisity

Assisted Living and Memory Care

Twin Oaks Assisted Living and Memory Care

654 East 3300 South, Salt Lake City, UT 84106 · Map
Licensed for 78 residents

State license active
Is this your community? Claim this listing

Twin Oaks Assisted Living and Memory Care is a state-licensed assisted living, memory care community in Salt Lake City, Utah. It is licensed for 78 residents. Lilisity publishes no score or ranking for this community; the details below come from the state licensing record.

Assisted LivingAlso memory care
78 residentsLicensed capacity
State licensedAssisted living facility - type ii, since 2021
$3,700 to $4,400/moTypical assisted living start in Utah, from 23 communities that publish prices

Prices

This community does not publish its prices.

Area costs

Assisted Living in Utah typically starts at $3,700 to $4,400 a month. Based on 23 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price.

Lilisity’s independent report

What the public record shows

Gathered by Lilisity from state and federal sources. Communities can’t edit this part of the page.

State inspections

11Citations
1Substantiated complaint allegations

Last inspection: Dec 8, 2025. See the record

License

Active, 78 residents

Assisted Living Facility - Type II F23-106874, licensed since Jul 13, 2021.

Nearest emergency room

1.2 miles

St Mark'S Hospital, rated 4 of 5 stars by CMS.

Side by side with nearby communities

The 4 nearest communities that offer assisted living, by straight-line distance. Prices are starting prices each community publishes; we never show estimates.

CommunityDistanceLicensed capacityPublished starting priceLicenseInspection citations
Twin Oaks Assisted Living and Memory Care this community78Not publishedActive11 citations, 1 substantiated complaint
Rosewood Assisted Care0.7 mi29Not publishedActive5 citations, 2 substantiated complaints
Highland Cove Retirement Community1.5 mi68Not publishedActive0 citations, 1 substantiated complaint
Niitsuma Living Center1.6 mi6Not publishedActive1 citation, 0 substantiated complaints
Legacy Village of Sugar House1.8 mi160Not publishedActive3 citations, 0 substantiated complaints
State inspection record11 citations, 1 substantiated complaint
Last inspection
December 8, 2025
Inspections shown
12
Citations from inspections
11
Substantiated complaint allegations
1
Civil money penalties assessed
$3,800
  • No citations at the last 3 inspections (April 2025 to December 2025)
  • Every citation from the March 20, 2025 inspection was corrected by April 28, 2025
  • License active since 2021

Substantiated complaint allegations, most recent first

  • August 13, 2024, Complaint, Investigation Inspection: Provider shall protect clients from abuse, prevent abuse R380-80-5(4); citation; High noncompliance level
    Complaint date(s): 08/08/2024.
    The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring clients were protected from abuse, neglect, harm, and mistreatment and any action that may have compromised the health and safety of clients through acts or omissions and did not instruct and encourage others to do the same. During the inspection, 1 resident was identified as having an injury of unknown origin and the provider did not ensure the resident was protected from any action that may have compromised their health and safety. Additionally, 2 residents were identified as alleged victims of abuse and the provider did not protect them and did not instruct and encourage others to do the same. Correction verified March 20, 2025.

Citations from inspections, most recent first

  • March 20, 2025, Follow-Up, Additional Follow-Up Inspection, Investigation Inspection: Resident unable to self administer medications R432-270-19(7)(a)-(f); repeat citation; Moderate noncompliance level
    The Licensee was out of compliance with R432-270-19(7)(d) by not ensuring medications were administered according to the prescribing order. During the inspection, a medication was not administered according to the prescribing order for 1 resident. This is a repeat noncompliance from the inspections dated August 13, 2024, October 28, 2024, and January 29, 2025.
    Civil money penalty assessed: $300. Correction verified April 28, 2025.
  • March 20, 2025, Follow-Up, Additional Follow-Up Inspection, Investigation Inspection: Resident unable to self administer medications R432-270-19(7)(a)-(f); repeat citation; Moderate noncompliance level
    The Licensee was out of compliance with R432-270-19(7)(b) by not ensuring facility staff administered medications only after delegation by a licensed health care professional under the scope of their practice. During the inspection, it was noted that 5 facility staff administered medications without delegation by the current licensed health care professional. This is a repeat noncompliance from the inspection dated January 29, 2025.
    Civil money penalty assessed: $300. Correction verified April 28, 2025.
  • January 29, 2025, Follow-Up, Additional Follow-Up Inspection: Critical incidents reporting requirements R380-600-7(16)(a)-(d); citation; Moderate noncompliance level
    The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring that when a critical incident occurred, the facility submitted a report of the critical incident to the office in the format required by the office within one business day of the critical incident occurrence. During the inspection, 1 resident had an injury of unknown origin and a critical incident was not reported to the office within 1 business day. This is a repeat noncompliance from the inspection dated 10/28/2024. Correction verified April 28, 2025.
  • January 29, 2025, Follow-Up, Additional Follow-Up Inspection: Administrator Duties R432-270-8(1)(a)-(p); repeat citation; Moderate noncompliance level
    The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring the administrator completed an investigation when there was reason to believe a resident had been subject to abuse and reported any suspected abuse in accordance with Section 62A-3-305. During the inspection, it was noted that 1 resident had an injury of unknown origin that was not investigated and was not reported to Adult Protective Services or the local police. This is a repeat noncompliance from the inspections dated 3/27/2024 and 12/4/2024.
    Civil money penalty assessed: $400. Correction verified March 20, 2025.
  • January 29, 2025, Follow-Up, Additional Follow-Up Inspection: Resident unable to self administer medications R432-270-19(7)(a)-(f); repeat citation; Moderate noncompliance level
    The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring (b) facility staff administered medications only after delegation by a licensed health care professional under the scope of their practice and (d) ensured medications were administered according to the prescribing order. During the inspection, it was noted that 2 facility staff administered medications without delegation by the licensed health care professional and medications were not administered according to the prescribing order for 1 resident. This is a repeat noncompliance from the inspections dated 8/13/2024 and 10/28/2024.
    Civil money penalty assessed: $300. Correction verified April 28, 2025.
  • January 29, 2025, Follow-Up, Additional Follow-Up Inspection: Provider shall protect clients from abuse, prevent abuse R380-80-5(4); repeat citation; Moderate noncompliance level
    The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring residents were protected from harm, mistreatment, and any action that compromised the health and safety of residents through acts or omissions. During the inspection, it was noted that after discovering a large number of narcotic medications had been tampered with for multiple residents', the facility reported staff were drug tested as part of the correction plan; 6 staff were not drug tested per the correction plan. This is a repeat noncompliance from inspections dated 8/13/2024 and 10/28/2024.
    Civil money penalty assessed: $800. Correction verified March 20, 2025.
  • and 5 more on the state’s site

Read the full record on the state’s site →

What these terms mean

DLBC: “Depending on both the seriousness and the likelihood of harm to a client (extreme, high, moderate, or low), each rule noncompliance is categorized as a Warning or Citation. Although providers are given the opportunity to correct any rule noncompliance, repeated warnings may become citations and repeated citations may result in civil money penalties (CMP) and other corrective actions.”

DLBC: “Conditional means that the provider is at risk of losing their license because compliance with licensing rules has not been maintained. During a conditional period the provider receives additional monitoring inspections and is financially charged for each visit.”

DLBC: “Only substantiated complaint allegations and citations from other inspections are displayed. Warnings are not displayed.” This community is licensed for 78 residents; larger communities are inspected and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Utah Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Licensing and Background Checks, data as of October 15, 2026, showing the past three years (health facility records start October 2023). Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.

License and ownershipActive license
License type
Assisted Living Facility - Type II
License number
F23-106874
License status
Active
Licensed since
2021-07-13
Licensed capacity
78
Administrator
Matthew Cielo

Source: Utah state licensing records (agency listing), retrieved 2026-09-09. Licensing status is a matter of public record; it is not a quality rating.

Administrator name from the Utah licensing record, as of Sep 9, 2026.

Paying with Medicaid and other programsHow Medicaid pays for care in Utah, and other programs

How Medicaid pays for care in Utah

  • New Choices Waiver. Yes, for some people. Utah Medicaid's New Choices Waiver can pay for support services for people who meet nursing facility level of care. To apply, you must already be living long term in a nursing facility, a licensed assisted living facility, or certain other licensed facilities, and there is a minimum length of stay. Assisted living facilities can be providers of the waiver's residential services. (state page)

Ask the community whether it accepts Medicaid.

Location and nearby careNearest hospital 1.2 mi, nursing home 0.8 mi, pharmacy 0.9 mi
Nearest hospital with an emergency room
St Mark'S Hospital, Salt Lake City. 1.2 miles away, straight line. CMS overall hospital rating: 4 of 5 stars.
Nearest Medicare nursing home
Monument Healthcare Murray Creek, Millcreek. 0.8 miles away, straight line.
Nearest home health agency office
Solstice Home Health, LLC, Salt Lake City. 1.3 miles away, straight line. Agencies travel to clients, so ask which ones serve this address.
Nearest pharmacy
Pharmacy. 0.9 miles away, straight line. From OpenStreetMap, which does not list every pharmacy, so one may be closer.
Area
USDA classes ZIP code 84106 as metropolitan (metropolitan core).
Dialysis within 15 miles
462530 Fresenius Kidney Care Wasatch, Salt Lake City, 1.0 mile away, straight line (CMS rating 4 of 5 stars)
463501 Intermountain Medical Center Dialysis Services, Murray, 2.7 miles away, straight line (has a shift starting after 5 pm; CMS rating 4 of 5 stars)
463502 Utah Dialysis Lab, Murray, 3.9 miles away, straight line (has a shift starting after 5 pm; CMS rating 4 of 5 stars)
Hospice
38 Medicare hospices tell CMS they serve ZIP code 84106.
Solstice Hospice And Palliative Care, LLC, office in Salt Lake City, 1.3 miles away, straight line
True North Hospice, office in South Salt Lake, 1.8 miles away, straight line
Hospice For Utah LLC, office in South Salt Lake, 1.8 miles away, straight line
Nearest geriatric medicine practice
Charles Fehlauer, MD, Salt Lake City. 2.1 miles away, straight line. 1 geriatric medicine doctor listed there.

Distances are straight lines from the community, not driving distance. Hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors come from CMS provider data (CMS, hospital list updated Jul 22, 2026). Star ratings are CMS’s own.

Emergency and natural hazard riskFEMA overall risk relatively moderate; outside FEMA's high-risk flood areas

Public hazard maps for this location. Ask the community about its emergency plan, its generator and where residents would go in an evacuation.

Flood zone
Zone X: 0.2% annual chance (500-year) flood area (moderate risk). (FEMA flood map)
FEMA National Risk Index
Overall: relatively moderate. By hazard: inland flooding very low, wildfire very low, tornado very low, heat wave relatively low, earthquake relatively high. These are FEMA’s ratings for the census tract, compared with tracts nationwide. (FEMA, December 2025)

A flood zone describes the map at this point, not the building's elevation. In an emergency, follow the local emergency management agency.

Questions to ask on a tour10 questions picked for this community from its record

Picked for this community from its record. Ask them in person and write down the answers.

  1. The state recorded a finding in March 2025. What was it, and how was it fixed?
  2. What does the base rate include, and when did rates last go up?
  3. How many caregivers work in memory care during the day, the evening and overnight, and for how many residents?
  4. What dementia training does each caregiver get before working alone, and every year after?
  5. How do staff respond when a resident is agitated, frightened or tries to leave?
  6. How many caregivers are on duty during the day and at night?
  7. What happens if care needs increase? When would someone need to move?
  8. What fees are charged at move-in?
  9. How do you tell families about falls, illness or changes?
  10. How long have the executive director and the head of care been here?
What we checked11 public sources we searched, with dates

Every public source we searched for this community. “Nothing on record” means we found no record that matched it. A record can be missed when a name or address differs.

SourceData as ofWhat we found
Utah Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Licensing and Background Checks inspection recordsOct 15, 2026See above
U.S. Department of Labor wage and hour casesOct 15, 2026Nothing on record
OSHA workplace safety inspections since 2016Oct 15, 2026Nothing on record
FEMA flood mapSee above
USDA wildfire riskApr 15, 2026Not shown: FEMA rates wildfire risk here very low
FEMA National Risk IndexSee above
CMS hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors; OpenStreetMap pharmaciesSee above
HUD Multifamily Properties - AssistedJul 6, 2026Nothing on record
State Veterans Homes (NASVH directory)Sep 20, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Hospice - General InformationAug 19, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Home Health Care AgenciesMay 27, 2026Nothing on record
Common questionsAnswers to 4 questions families ask
What type of care does Twin Oaks Assisted Living and Memory Care provide?

Twin Oaks Assisted Living and Memory Care is licensed by the state of Utah for assisted living, memory care in Salt Lake City, Utah. Its licensed capacity is 78 residents.

Does Lilisity rate Twin Oaks Assisted Living and Memory Care?

No. We publish state licensing details for Twin Oaks Assisted Living and Memory Care but no score, rating, or ranking. Only communities on the Top Communities list or with a Senior Living Alliance Excellence Award, both based on phone-verified resident and family interviews, are ranked.

How much does Twin Oaks Assisted Living and Memory Care cost?

Assisted Living in Utah typically starts at $3,700 to $4,400 a month. Based on 23 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price. Twin Oaks Assisted Living and Memory Care does not publish its prices.

How do I contact Twin Oaks Assisted Living and Memory Care?

Visit Twin Oaks Assisted Living and Memory Care at 654 East 3300 South, Salt Lake City, UT 84106.

Choosing assisted livingOur care guide: what to look for, what it costs, how families pay, and more questions to ask (PDF)

Report a wrong fact

How Lilisity works. The only scores or rankings Lilisity publishes are the Top Communities list and the Excellence Awards, both built from phone-verified resident and family interviews. Communities can pay Lilisity a flat monthly fee to manage their own listing: photos, prices, contact details, and receiving the inquiries families choose to send them. The fee is the same no matter how many families contact them or move in. Senior Living Alliance, which runs Lilisity, offers the same listing to its member communities as part of their membership; members pay SLA for its resident and family interview program. No community pays Lilisity per inquiry, per referral or per move-in. Payment never changes a testimonial, a rating, or the order of search results. The "Nearby Senior Living Alliance communities" box shows member communities only. How we verify testimonials · How we are paid