The Peaks at Clinton

Last inspection

May 11, 2026

Inspections shown

10

Citations from inspections

3

Substantiated complaint allegations

14

Civil money penalties assessed

$1,700

• No citations at the last inspection (May 2026)
• License active since 2016

Substantiated complaint allegations, most recent first

• February 25, 2026, Complaint, Investigation Inspection: Administrator duties R432-270-7(1)(a)-(n); repeat citation; High noncompliance level
  Complaint date(s): 02/09/2026.
  The provider was found out of compliance with R432-270-7(1)(k) for failing to ensure that suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation was reported in accordance with Section 26B-6-205. During the inspection, it was determined that the facility failed to timely report suspicious bruising involving two residents to Adult Protective Services (APS).
  Civil money penalty assessed: $300. Correction: Follow-up required to verify compliance/maintenance.
• February 25, 2026, Complaint, Investigation Inspection: Provider shall protect clients from abuse, prevent abuse R380-80-5(4); citation; High noncompliance level
  Complaint date(s): 02/09/2026.
  The provider was out of compliance with R432-270-5(4) by not ensuring a resident was protected from abuse, harm, and mistreatment and any action that may have compromised the health and safety of clients through acts or omissions and did not instruct and encourage others to do the same. During the inspection, the licensor identified 2 residents with injuries of unknown origin that the facility failed to investigate as required.
  Civil money penalty assessed: $200. Correction: Follow-up required to verify compliance/maintenance.
• November 5, 2025, Complaint, Investigation Inspection, Follow-Up, Additional Follow-Up Inspection: Notification of medication errors R432-270-18(14); citation; Moderate noncompliance level
  Complaint date(s): 10/22/2025.
  The provider was out of compliance with R432-270-(18)(14) by not ensuring the licensed health care professional was notified when medication errors occurred. During the inspection, the licensor observed 1 resident had multiple narcotic administrations documented solely on the narcotic count sheet, with no corresponding documentation entered into the medication administration record (MAR). The licensed health care professional was not documented to have notified when these medication errors occurred.
  Civil money penalty assessed: $150. Correction: Follow-up required to verify compliance/maintenance.
• November 5, 2025, Complaint, Investigation Inspection, Follow-Up, Additional Follow-Up Inspection: Policies and procedures for medications R432-270-18(19)(a)-(b); citation; High noncompliance level
  Complaint date(s): 10/22/2025.
  The provider was out of compliance with R432-270-18(19)(a) by not ensuring policies were implemented for the destruction and disposal of outdated medications. During the inspection, the licensor observed the facility’s medication cart contained 1 resident’s outdated narcotic medication that had not been destroyed or properly disposed of.
  Civil money penalty assessed: $200. Correction: Follow-up required to verify compliance/maintenance.
• November 5, 2025, Complaint, Investigation Inspection, Follow-Up, Additional Follow-Up Inspection: Administrator duties R432-270-7(1)(a)-(n); citation; Moderate noncompliance level
  Complaint date(s): 10/22/2025.
  The provider was out of compliance with R432-270-7(1)(k) by not ensuring suspected exploitation and appropriate action was documented. During the inspection, the licensor noted that 1 employee had been terminated for suspicious narcotic administration involving a resident. Documentation was not completed by the facility regarding the employee’s alleged suspicious narcotic administration activity or the termination and corrective action taken afterward.
  Civil money penalty assessed: $150. Correction: Follow-up required to verify compliance/maintenance.
• November 5, 2025, Complaint, Investigation Inspection, Follow-Up, Additional Follow-Up Inspection: Personnel records maintained R432-270-20(3)(a)-(j); citation; Low noncompliance level
  Complaint date(s): 10/22/2025.
  The provider was out of compliance with R432-270-20(3) by not ensuring the personnel records were maintained and available for review. During the inspection, the licensor requested the personnel record for 1 former employee. The personnel record was not available for review.
  Civil money penalty assessed: $100. Correction: Follow-up required to verify compliance/maintenance.
• and 8 more on the state’s site

Citations from inspections, most recent first

• August 21, 2025, Follow-Up, Additional Follow-Up Inspection: Posting of license or certificate R380-600-3(25); citation; Low noncompliance level
  The provider was out of compliance with rule R380-600-3(25) by not posting their current license in a readily visible location to the public. Specifically, the licensor observed that the posted license was not current and listed a previous administrator and management company. This is a repeat non-compliance from the inspection conducted on June 30, 2025 Correction verified November 5, 2025.
• August 21, 2025, Follow-Up, Additional Follow-Up Inspection: Inspection reports available R432-270-21(6); citation; Low noncompliance level
  The provider was out of compliance with rule R432-270-(21)(6) by not ensuring the inspection report by the local health department was maintained at the facility. Specifically, the licensor observed that the facility did not maintain the kitchen’s county health department inspection, and the certificate on display was outdated. This is a repeat non-compliance from the inspection conducted on June 30, 2025. Correction verified November 5, 2025.
• March 19, 2025, Follow-Up Inspection: Significant change R432-270-13(5); citation; Low noncompliance level
  The licensee was out of compliance with R432-270-13(5) by neglecting to revise and update the assessments of two residents after a significant change occurred. During the inspection, the licensor observed that two residents, who had documented significant changes and were admitted to hospice, lacked completed significant change assessments. This was a repeat noncompliance as noted on 01/06/2025. Correction verified June 4, 2025.

Read the full record on the state’s site →

DLBC: “Only substantiated complaint allegations and citations from other inspections are displayed. Warnings are not displayed.” This community is licensed for 66 residents; larger communities are inspected and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Utah Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Licensing and Background Checks, data as of October 15, 2026, showing the past three years (health facility records start October 2023). Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.