Assisted Living
Suzanne Elise Assisted Living
101 Forest Drive, Seaside, OR 97138 · Map
Licensed for 90 residents
Suzanne Elise Assisted Living is a state-licensed assisted living community in Seaside, Oregon. It is licensed for 90 residents. Lilisity publishes no score or ranking for this community; the details below come from the state licensing record.
Prices
Starting prices the community publishes, with the date we checked each one and a link to where it is published. Care charges are usually added after an assessment.
| Care | Starting at | Checked |
|---|---|---|
| Assisted Living | $5,440 /mo | Oct 12, 2026 |
Area costs
Care and services
From the community’s website
What Suzanne Elise Assisted Living says about itself, quoted from its own site. We have not checked these claims against licensing records. Ask about each one on a tour.
Lilisity’s independent report
What the public record shows
Gathered by Lilisity from state and federal sources. Communities can’t edit this part of the page.
State inspections
Last inspection: Dec 4, 2024. See the record
License
Active, 90 residents
Assisted Living Facility 70M092.
Nearest emergency room
0.5 miles
Providence Seaside Hospital, rated 3 of 5 stars by CMS.
Side by side with nearby communities
The 4 nearest communities that offer assisted living, by straight-line distance. Prices are starting prices each community publishes; we never show estimates.
| Community | Distance | Licensed capacity | Published starting price | License | Inspection citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Suzanne Elise Assisted Living this community | 90 | $5,440/mo | Active | 7 deficiencies, 26 violations | |
| Neawanna By The Sea | 0.3 mi | 48 | $4,795/mo | Active | 13 deficiencies, 7 violations |
| Avamere at Seaside Residential Care Facility | 1.7 mi | 40 | $7,403/mo | Active | 27 deficiencies, 54 violations |
| Clatsop Care Memory Community | 9.9 mi | 32 | Not published | Active | 33 deficiencies, 31 violations |
| Clatsop Care Retirement Village | 12.7 mi | 80 | Not published | Active | 17 deficiencies, 5 violations |
State inspection record7 deficiencies, 26 violations
- Last inspection
- December 4, 2024
- Inspections
- 3, 7 deficiencies cited
- Substantiated abuse
- 11
- Substantiated licensing violations
- 15
- Regulatory actions
- 0
- Fines assessed
- $3,814.00 (11 violations)
- Current owner since
- November 1, 2007
Inspections
- December 4, 2024: Re-Licensure, 5 deficiencies cited report
- C0252: Resident Move-in & Evaluation: Res Evaluation severity level 2, scope L2 Isolated
- C0260: Service Plan: General severity level 2, scope L2 Pattern
- C0270: Change of Condition and Monitoring severity level 2, scope L2 Pattern
- C0303: Systems: Treatment Orders severity level 2, scope L2 Isolated
- C0305: Systems: Resident Right to Refuse severity level 2, scope L2 Pattern
- October 5, 2023: State Licensure, 1 deficiency cited report
- C0000: Comment severity level 0
- C0240: Resident Services Meals, Food Sanitation Rule severity level 2, scope L2 Pattern, corrected December 4, 2023
- August 1, 2022: Complaint Investig., 1 deficiency cited report
- C0010: Licensing Complaint Investigation severity level 2, scope L2 Isolated
- C0360: Staffing Requirements and Training: Staffing severity level 2, scope L2 Isolated
Substantiated abuse or neglect
- October 13, 2025: Failed to follow care plan Abuse: Neglect; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; fine $500.00; report
Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration); 411-054-0027 (Resident Rights and Protections); 411-054-0028 (Reporting and Investigating Abuse and Other Actions Affecting Resident Welfare); 411-054-0036 (Service Plan – General)State’s findings
On or about October 13, 2025, the facility failed to adhere to the Alleged Victim’s (AV) individualized care plan and care needs. Based on facility documentation and staff interviews, AV was observed wearing a pad containing dried fecal matter, with fecal matter adhered to their body, indicating inadequate hygiene care. Furthermore, staff applied topical cream by pulling AV’s shirt downward without ensuring privacy. The facility’s failure to provide appropriate hygiene care and maintain privacy resulted in unreasonable discomfort and a loss of dignity for AV which is a violation of resident rights and is considered neglect of care which constitutes abuse.
- May 29, 2025: Failed to follow care plan Abuse: Neglect; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; fine $250.00; report
Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration); 411-054-0027 (Resident Rights and Protections); 411-054-0028 (Reporting and Investigating Abuse and Other Actions Affecting Resident Welfare); 411-054-0036 (Service Plan – General)State’s findings
The facility failed to provide basic care and services necessary to maintain Alleged Victim's (AV) health and safety. This included not assisting with hygiene, bathing, and foot care, and failing to follow the individualized care plan, which placed AV at risk for skin breakdown and other health complications. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure a safe and effective medication administration system, resulting in AV not receiving prescribed anxiety and pain medications. This failure caused AV to experience increased pain and anxiety, further compromising AV’s well-being. The facility’s overall failure to provide services in accordance with AV’s assessed care needs caused AV unreasonable discomfort, which is a violation of resident rights, is considered neglect of care and constitutes abuse.
- November 14, 2024: Failed to properly plan care Abuse: Neglect; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; fine $188.00; report
Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration); 411-054-0027 (Resident Rights and Protections); 411-054-0028 (Reporting and Investigating Abuse and Other Actions Affecting Resident Welfare); 411-054-0036 (Service Plan – General)State’s findings
The Alleged Victim (AV) is care planned as a fall risk and has some interventions in place to reduce falls, such as proper footwear, calling for assistance with transfers and increased safety checks. Between November 8, 2024 and November 16, 2024, AV suffered 11 falls, with and without injury. On some falls, AV was not wearing proper footwear and on other falls, AV's pendant was not on when he/she fell. Interventions placed after these falls were not effective and often recycled. The facility's failure to properly care plan to reduce the risk of falls is a violation of resident rights, is considered neglect of care and constitutes abuse.
- August 22, 2022: Failed to follow care plan Abuse: Neglect; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; fine $500.00; report
Rules: 411-054-0027 (Resident Rights and Protections); 411-054-0028 (Reporting and Investigating Abuse and Other Actions Affecting Resident Welfare); 411-054-0036 (Service Plan – General)State’s findings
The facility failed to provide appropriate services according to the Alleged Victim’s (AV) Insulin resistant medical need and toenail care. The facility's failure to follow AV's care plan resulted in unreasonable discomfort, which is a violation of resident rights, is considered neglect of care and constitutes abuse.
- June 4, 2022: Failed to follow care plan Abuse: Neglect; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; fine $188.00; report
Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration); 411-054-0027 (Resident Rights and Protections); 411-054-0028 (Reporting and Investigating Abuse and Other Actions Affecting Resident Welfare); 411-054-0036 (Service Plan – General)State’s findings
According to the documentation, the facility failed to follow the care plan of the Alleged Victim’s (AV) by placing their fall mat next to their bed when the AV was in bed. On or about June 04, 2022, the AV fell out of their bed and landed on the floor. When the AV was found, the fall mat was not placed next to their bed and the AV was on the ground. The AV was sent to the hospital for evaluation for serious injury. They returned later that day with a diagnosis of a hematoma on their head. The facility failed to follow the care plan by placing the fall mat next to AV’s bed placing the AV at risk of harm, which is a violation of resident rights, is considered neglect of care and constitutes abuse.
Show all 11
- June 1, 2022: Failed to provide a safe medication administration system Abuse: Neglect; Level 3 - Moderate harm or potential for serious harm; fine $500.00; report
Rules: 411-054-0027 (Resident Rights and Protections); 411-054-0028 (Reporting and Investigating Abuse and Other Actions Affecting Resident Welfare); 411-054-0055 (Medications and Treatments)State’s findings
The facility failed to provide a safe medication administration system to ensure The Alleged Victim’s (AV) medications were administered as ordered. Based on interviews and facility documentation, it was determined that AV did not receive his/her psychotropic injection ever 3 weeks as ordered since December 2021, causing unreasonable discomfort. The facility's failure is a violation of resident rights, is considered neglect of care and constitutes abuse.
- May 7, 2022: Failed to provide safe environment Abuse: Neglect; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; fine $250.00; report
Rules: 411-054-0027 (Resident Rights and Protections); 411-054-0028 (Reporting and Investigating Abuse and Other Actions Affecting Resident Welfare); 411-054-0036 (Service Plan – General)State’s findings
The facility failed to provide supervision to the Alleged Victim (AV) according to his/her needs. The failure resulted in AV not receiving oxygen for 30 minutes due to facility staff failing to ensure that AV had oxygen in his/her portable oxygen tank, The facility's failure is a violation of resident rights, is considered neglect of care and constitutes abuse.
- April 5, 2022: Failed to assure timely medical treatment Abuse: Neglect; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; fine $188.00; report
Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration); 411-054-0027 (Resident Rights and Protections); 411-054-0028 (Reporting and Investigating Abuse and Other Actions Affecting Resident Welfare); 411-054-0055 (Medications and Treatments)State’s findings
Facility and Alleged Perpetrator 2 (AP2) failed to ensure Alleged Victim (AV) had his/her sutures removed according to physician's orders. According to facility documentation and interviews, AP2 failed to make an appointment to have AV's sutures removed and AP2 personally removed AV's sutures. AP2's actions to remove AV's sutures in not within his/her scope of practice to remove sutures. AP2 is responsible for neglect of care which constitutes abuse. The facility failed to follow up on AV's doctor orders and did not provide oversight to ensure AV was scheduled for suture removal. AV went two weeks over from the time his/her sutures should have been removed. The facility's failure is a violation of resident rights, is considered neglect of care which constitutes abuse.
- February 5, 2022: Failed to properly plan care Abuse: Neglect; Level 3 - Moderate harm or potential for serious harm; fine $500.00; report
Rules: 411-054-0027 (Resident Rights and Protections); 411-054-0028 (Reporting and Investigating Abuse and Other Actions Affecting Resident Welfare); 411-054-0036 (Service Plan – General)State’s findings
The facility failed to implement interventions and appropriately care plan related to the Alleged Victim's (AV) fall history. The failure resulted in AV experiencing two (2) falls; one fall on February 5, 2022 and another fall on February 8, 2022. AV was transferred to the hospital after each of the falls due to pain. The facility's failure to properly care plan for AV's fall risk caused AV unreasonable discomfort which is a violation of resident rights, is considered neglect of care and constitutes abuse.
- November 15, 2021: Failed to follow care plan Abuse: Neglect; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; fine $500.00; report
Rules: 411-054-0027 (Resident Rights and Protections); 411-054-0028 (Reporting and Investigating Abuse and Other Actions Affecting Resident Welfare); 411-054-0036 (Service Plan – General)State’s findings
The facility failed to provide appropriate services according to the Alleged Victim’s (AV) oxygen care needs. The failure resulted in AV’s condition worsening causing unreasonable discomfort, which is a violation of resident rights, is considered neglect of care and constitutes abuse.
- October 19, 2021: Failed to provide safe environment Abuse: Neglect; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; fine $250.00; report
Rules: 411-054-0027 (Resident Rights and Protections); 411-054-0028 (Reporting and Investigating Abuse and Other Actions Affecting Resident Welfare)State’s findings
The facility failed to provide appropriate supervision to the Alleged Victim (AV) according to his/her needs. The failure resulted in AV unsafely leaving the facility without assistance and staff knowledge, placing him/her at risk of potential harm. The facility's failure to provide a safe environment is a violation of resident rights, is considered neglect of care and constitutes abuse.
Substantiated licensing violations
- April 17, 2024: Failed to provide safe environment Licensing Violation; Level 3 - Moderate harm or potential for serious harm; report
Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration); 411-054-0027 (Resident Rights and Protections)State’s findings
On or about April 17, 2024, Alleged Victim (AV) gave Alleged Perpetrator 2 (AP2) his/her debit card so AP2 could mail personal packages for AV to AV's family members. AV trusted AP2 to only use his/her debit card to mail personal packages for AV. AP2, an employee of the facility, financially exploited AV by taking AV's debit card and using AV’s debit card to pay for AP2's personal expenses, causing AV financial and emotional harm. Based on facility documentation and interviews, AP2 used AV's debit card to charge $100 at a gas station and another charge, totaling $1,084.17 at a dance studio. AV did not authorize AP2 to use his/her debit card at the gas station and/or at the dance studio. AV only authorized AP2 to use his/her debit card to mail AV’s packages. AP2's action is considered financial exploitation which is considered abuse. The facility failed to protect AV from financial exploitation, which is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.
- June 30, 2023: Failed to provide safe environment Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration)State’s findings
Alleged Perpetrator 2 (AP2) physically abused Alleged Victim (AV) by using physical force while assisting AV with his/her Activities of Daily Living resulting in physical harm to AV. Based on facility documentation and interviews, AP2 pulled off AV's compression sock roughly, causing AV unreasonable pain and discomfort. AP2's actions is considered physical abuse. The facility failed to provide a safe environment for AV which is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.
- July 6, 2022: Failed to provide safe environment Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
Rules: 411-054-0070 (Staffing Requirements and Training)State’s findings
The facility failed to have qualified awake direct care staff, sufficient in number to meet the 24-hour scheduled and unscheduled needs of each resident. The facility's failure to provide a safe environment is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.
- May 23, 2022: Failed to administer medication as ordered Licensing Violation; Level 1 - No harm or potential for minor harm; report
Rules: 411-054-0055 (Medications and Treatments)State’s findings
The allegation that the facility failed to have a safe medication system in place in accordance with OAR 411-054-0055(1). Per complaint that the facility loses the residents medications on a regular basis was substantiated.
- May 10, 2022: Failed to assure physician services Licensing Violation; Level 1 - No harm or potential for minor harm; report
Rules: 411-054-0045 (Resident Health Services)State’s findings
The allegation that the facility failed to have a protocol to facilitate the receipt of information from the provider in accordance with OAR 411-054-0045(2)(b)(D) was substantiated.
Show all 15
- May 10, 2022: Failed to provide or assist with hygiene Licensing Violation; Level 1 - No harm or potential for minor harm; report
Rules: 411-054-0030 (Resident Services)State’s findings
The allegation that the facility failed to assist residents with bathing and toileting in accordance with OAR 411-054-0030(1)(e)(B)and(G) per complaint that the facility is not assisting residents with bathing and toileting was verified
- May 10, 2022: Failed to provide safe environment Licensing Violation; Level 1 - No harm or potential for minor harm; report
Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration)State’s findings
The allegation that the facility failed to exercise reasonable precautions against any condition that may threaten the health, safety, or welfare of the residents in accordance with OAR 411-054-0025(4) per complaint that staff are not wearing masks in the facility was substantiated.
- May 10, 2022: Failed to provide appropriate housekeeping services Licensing Violation; Level 1 - No harm or potential for minor harm; report
Rules: 411-054-0300 (Assisted Living Facility Building Requirements)State’s findings
the allegation that the facility failed to keep all interior materials and surfaces clean in accordance with OAR 411-054-0300(4)(i) per complaint that resident's room is very dirty was verified.
- February 23, 2022: Failed to provide safe environment Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
Rules: 411-054-0300 (Assisted Living Facility Building Requirements)State’s findings
The facility failed to keep all interior materials and surfaces clean. An investigation determined the facility violated an Oregon Administrative Rules.
- February 1, 2022: Failed to provide service Licensing Violation; Level 3 - Moderate harm or potential for serious harm; report
Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration); 411-054-0045 (Resident Health Services)State’s findings
On or about February 1, 2022, Alleged Preparator 2 (AP2) failed to prioritize the assessment of the Alleged Victim (AV), who had a documented serious cardiac medical condition. At time of incident, AV presented with acute symptoms, including significant shortness of breath, which required immediate clinical attention by AP2. According to facility documentation and staff interviews, AP2 did not assess AV despite the presence of symptoms indicating a potential medical emergency. Approximately one hour later, AV was evaluated by Witness 2 (W2), who determined that AV’s oxygen saturation levels were critically low. Due to the worsening of AV’s condition, W2 arranged for AV to be transferred to the hospital, where AV required a three-day inpatient stay for treatment of exacerbated shortness of breath. AP2’s delay in assessment placed AV at increased risk, given AV’s underlying cardiac condition and low oxygen levels. AP2 failed to check on AV after being notified that AV required a nursing assessment for shortness of breath. This failure resulted in AV waiting at least one hour in respiratory distress due to lack of oxygen. AP2's actions is considered neglect of care which constitutes abuse. The facility is responsible for the quality of services provided, as well as for the supervision, training, and conduct of staff. The facility failed to ensure AV received appropriate nursing services is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.
- November 29, 2021: Failed to provide safe environment Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
Rules: 411-054-0070 (Staffing Requirements and Training)State’s findings
The facility failed to have sufficient staff to meet the scheduled and unscheduled needs of the residents. The facility's failure to provide a safe environment is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.
- October 27, 2021: Failed to provide infection control Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration)State’s findings
The facility failed to exercise reasonable precautions against any condition that may threaten the health, safety, or welfare of the residents. An investigation determined the facility violated Oregon Administrative Rules.
- October 27, 2021: Failed to properly plan care Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
Rules: 411-054-0036 (Service Plan – General)State’s findings
The facility failed to have the service plan be reflective of the residents' needs and updated quarterly. An investigation determined the facility violated Oregon Administrative Rules.
- October 27, 2021: Failed to provide safe environment Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
Rules: 411-054-0300 (Assisted Living Facility Building Requirements)State’s findings
The facility failed to ensure all interior and materials and surfaces (e.g. floors, walls, roofs, ceilings, windows, and furniture) and all equipment necessary for the health, safety, and comfort of the resident must be kept clean and in good repair. An investigation determined the facility violated Oregon Administrative Rules.
- October 27, 2021: Failed to properly post and maintain daily staffing documentation Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration)State’s findings
Facility failure to ensure required posting, to include manager on duty, was posted in an accessible area. An investigation determined the facility violated Oregon Administrative Rules.
Read the full record on the state’s site →
ODHS lists only substantiated violations: “either a substantiated instance of abuse or a licensing violation. Open investigations and complaints that are being appealed by the provider are not listed.” Oregon counts neglect as a form of abuse; see the state’s definitions of abuse. Each violation shows the level ODHS gives it, in the state’s words (for example “2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm”), and any fine ODHS assessed. Inspection citations show the state’s severity level and scope, and the date ODHS recorded the problem as corrected when it lists one. Rule names come from the Oregon Administrative Rules. ODHS: “Formal regulatory actions can range from a condition placed upon a license due to non-compliance or a notice to revoke a license.” This community is licensed for 90 residents; larger communities are inspected and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Oregon Department of Human Services, Long-Term Care Licensing, data as of October 15, 2026, showing the last five years. Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.
License and ownershipActive license
- License type
- Assisted Living Facility
- License number
- 70M092
- License status
- Active
- Licensed capacity
- 90
- County
- Clatsop County
Source: Oregon state licensing records (agency listing), retrieved 2026-09-09. Licensing status is a matter of public record; it is not a quality rating.
Paying with Medicaid and other programsOn the Oregon list of Medicaid providers (2026)
On the Oregon list of Medicaid providers. Listed as Suzanne Elise Assisted Living under Accepts Medicaid (ODHS licensing record). (state list, as of Sep 9, 2026)
Being on the list means the community has taken part in the program. Ask whether it has a Medicaid opening now, and how many residents it serves on Medicaid.
Staff pay and workplace safety2 OSHA inspections, 1 violation cited
Federal records about how the employer here treats its staff.
OSHA workplace safety inspections
OSHA inspects workplaces for staff safety, such as lifting, needles, chemicals and workplace violence. It does not inspect resident care.
- Dec 30, 2024: programmed (planned) inspection, complete (safety). Case closed Jan 22, 2025. No violations cited. OSHA record. OSHA recorded the employer as 317738972 - Forest Drive Operations LLC. Matched by street address; the name OSHA recorded differs from the community's.
- Apr 5, 2017: programmed (planned) inspection, complete (safety). Case closed Sep 27, 2017. 1 violation cited (1 other). Penalties: $0 proposed, $0 now. OSHA record. OSHA recorded the employer as 317716484 - Forest Drive Operations LLC. Matched by street address; the name OSHA recorded differs from the community's.
Details
- Other than serious: Cited rule OAR. Penalty $0 proposed, $0 now. To be fixed by May 15, 2017.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor OSHA enforcement data, as of Oct 15, 2026, inspections since 2016. Penalties can change while a case is open or contested.
Location and nearby careNearest hospital 0.5 mi, nursing home 13.7 mi, pharmacy 0.6 mi
- Nearest hospital with an emergency room
- Providence Seaside Hospital, Seaside. 0.5 miles away, straight line. CMS overall hospital rating: 3 of 5 stars.
- Nearest Medicare nursing home
- Clatsop Care Center, Astoria. 13.7 miles away, straight line.
- Nearest home health agency office
- Adventist Health Home Care Services - Tillamook, Tillamook. 37.4 miles away, straight line. Agencies travel to clients, so ask which ones serve this address.
- Nearest pharmacy
- Rite Aid. 0.6 miles away, straight line. From OpenStreetMap, which does not list every pharmacy, so one may be closer.
- Area
- USDA classes ZIP code 97138 as small town (small town core).
- Dialysis within 15 miles
- Pnrs-North Coast Dialysis Clinic, Astoria, 13.8 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 2 of 5 stars)
- Hospice
- 2 Medicare hospices tell CMS they serve ZIP code 97138.
Lower Columbia Hospice, office in Astoria, 14.0 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 5 of 5 stars) - Nearest geriatric medicine practice
- Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Of The Northwest, Vancouver. 63.3 miles away, straight line. 1 geriatric medicine doctor listed there.
Distances are straight lines from the community, not driving distance. Hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors come from CMS provider data (CMS, hospital list updated Jul 22, 2026). Star ratings are CMS’s own.
Emergency and natural hazard riskFEMA overall risk very high; outside FEMA's high-risk flood areas
Public hazard maps for this location. Ask the community about its emergency plan, its generator and where residents would go in an evacuation.
- Flood zone
- Outside the high and moderate risk flood areas on FEMA's flood map (Zone X, minimal flood hazard, or not studied). (FEMA flood map)
- FEMA National Risk Index
- Overall: very high. By hazard: inland flooding very high, coastal flooding relatively moderate, wildfire relatively low, tornado very low, heat wave relatively low, earthquake very high. These are FEMA’s ratings for the census tract, compared with tracts nationwide. (FEMA, December 2025)
A flood zone describes the map at this point, not the building's elevation. In an emergency, follow the local emergency management agency.
Questions to ask on a tour10 questions picked for this community from its record
Picked for this community from its record. Ask them in person and write down the answers.
- The state recorded a finding in October 2025. What was it, and how was it fixed?
- Your published starting price is a base rate. What would the total monthly cost be for my parent's needs?
- How much have prices gone up in each of the last three years?
- How many caregivers are on duty during the day and at night?
- What happens if care needs increase? When would someone need to move?
- What fees are charged at move-in?
- How do you tell families about falls, illness or changes?
- How long have the executive director and the head of care been here?
- Who gives medications, and what training do they have?
- For what reasons can a resident be asked to leave?
What we checked13 public sources we searched, with dates
Every public source we searched for this community. “Nothing on record” means we found no record that matched it. A record can be missed when a name or address differs.
| Source | Data as of | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Oregon Department of Human Services, Long-Term Care Licensing inspection records | Oct 15, 2026 | See above |
| Oregon Medicaid provider list | Sep 9, 2026 | See above |
| U.S. Department of Labor wage and hour cases | Oct 15, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| OSHA workplace safety inspections since 2016 | Oct 15, 2026 | See above |
| FEMA flood map | See above | |
| USDA wildfire risk | Apr 15, 2026 | Not shown: FEMA rates wildfire risk here relatively low |
| FEMA National Risk Index | See above | |
| CMS hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors; OpenStreetMap pharmacies | See above | |
| HUD Multifamily Properties - Assisted | Jul 6, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| State Veterans Homes (NASVH directory) | Sep 20, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| CMS Hospice - General Information | Aug 19, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| CMS Home Health Care Agencies | May 27, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| The community’s own website | See above |
Common questionsAnswers to 4 questions families ask
What type of care does Suzanne Elise Assisted Living provide?
Suzanne Elise Assisted Living is licensed by the state of Oregon for assisted living in Seaside, Oregon. Its licensed capacity is 90 residents.
Does Lilisity rate Suzanne Elise Assisted Living?
No. We publish state licensing details for Suzanne Elise Assisted Living but no score, rating, or ranking. Only communities on the Top Communities list or with a Senior Living Alliance Excellence Award, both based on phone-verified resident and family interviews, are ranked.
How much does Suzanne Elise Assisted Living cost?
Assisted Living in Oregon typically starts at $4,600 to $5,800 a month. Based on 108 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price. The starting prices it publishes are in the Prices section on this page.
How do I contact Suzanne Elise Assisted Living?
Use Suzanne Elise Assisted Living's website, suzanneelise.com, or visit at 101 Forest Drive, Seaside, OR 97138.
How Lilisity works. The only scores or rankings Lilisity publishes are the Top Communities list and the Excellence Awards, both built from phone-verified resident and family interviews. Communities can pay Lilisity a flat monthly fee to manage their own listing: photos, prices, contact details, and receiving the inquiries families choose to send them. The fee is the same no matter how many families contact them or move in. Senior Living Alliance, which runs Lilisity, offers the same listing to its member communities as part of their membership; members pay SLA for its resident and family interview program. No community pays Lilisity per inquiry, per referral or per move-in. Payment never changes a testimonial, a rating, or the order of search results. The "Nearby Senior Living Alliance communities" box shows member communities only. How we verify testimonials · How we are paid