Lilisity

Assisted Living

Mt Angel Towers

One Towers Lane Box 2120, Mount Angel, OR 97362 · Map
Licensed for 32 residents

State license active
Is this your community? Claim this listing

Mt Angel Towers is a state-licensed assisted living community in Mount Angel, Oregon. It is licensed for 32 residents. Lilisity publishes no score or ranking for this community; the details below come from the state licensing record.

Assisted LivingCare offered
32 residentsLicensed capacity
State licensedResidential care facility
$4,600 to $5,800/moTypical assisted living start in Oregon, from 108 communities that publish prices

Prices

This community does not publish its prices.

Area costs

Assisted Living in Oregon typically starts at $4,600 to $5,800 a month. Based on 108 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price.

Care and services

From the community’s website

What Mt Angel Towers says about itself, quoted from its own site. We have not checked these claims against licensing records. Ask about each one on a tour.

  • Provides transportation. Residents enjoy the convenience of our regularly scheduled transportation services several days each week, offering trips to nearby cities for shopping, medical appointments, and local errands. (page, checked Oct 12, 2026)
  • 2 meals a day. , exercise class and gym, as well as 2 meals per day in our restaurant-style dining room. (page, checked Oct 12, 2026)
  • Pets allowed. Select a Garden apartment with its own private patio where pets are welcome. (page, checked Oct 12, 2026)
  • Apartment types named: studio, one-bedroom, two-bedroom. Independent Living offers studios, 1-bedroom and 2-bedroom apartments with a large array of floorplans and prices. (page, checked Oct 12, 2026)
  • Entrance fee: none. No Buy-in (page, checked Oct 12, 2026)

Lilisity’s independent report

What the public record shows

Gathered by Lilisity from state and federal sources. Communities can’t edit this part of the page.

State inspections

15Deficiencies cited
17Substantiated violations

Last inspection: May 14, 2026. See the record

License

Active, 32 residents

Residential Care Facility 50R085.

Nearest emergency room

4.2 miles

Legacy Silverton Medical Center.

Side by side with nearby communities

The 4 nearest communities that offer assisted living, by straight-line distance. Prices are starting prices each community publishes; we never show estimates.

CommunityDistanceLicensed capacityPublished starting priceLicenseInspection citations
Mt Angel Towers this community32Not publishedActive15 deficiencies, 17 violations
Mt. Angel Orchard House0.7 mi54Not publishedActive8 deficiencies, 1 violations
Trustwell Living at Davenport Place3.8 miNot listedNot publishedActive0 deficiencies, 1 violations
Heartwood Place7.1 mi48Not publishedActive20 deficiencies, 13 violations
Emerald Gardens7.1 mi59Not publishedActive41 deficiencies, 64 violations
State inspection record15 deficiencies, 17 violations
Last inspection
May 14, 2026
Inspections
5, 15 deficiencies cited
Substantiated abuse
6
Substantiated licensing violations
11
Regulatory actions
0
Fines assessed
$2,388.00 (6 violations)
Current owner since
April 6, 2002

Inspections

  • May 14, 2026: Re-Licensure, 1 deficiency cited report
    • C0555: Call Sys, Exit Dr Alarm, Phones, TV, or Cable severity level 2, scope L2 Widespread
  • June 18, 2025: Re-Licensure, 7 deficiencies cited report
    • C0240: Resident Services Meals, Food Sanitation Rule severity level 2, scope L2 Widespread
    • C0260: Service Plan: General severity level 2, scope L2 Pattern
    • C0270: Change of Condition and Monitoring severity level 2, scope L2 Pattern
    • C0310: Systems: Medication Administration severity level 2, scope L2 Pattern
    • C0363: Acuity Based Staffing Tool - Updates & Staffing Plan severity level 2, scope L2 Pattern
    • C0370: Staffing Requirements and Training ? Pre-service severity level 2, scope L2 Pattern
    • C0372: Training Within 30 Days of Hire ? Direct Care Staff severity level 2, scope L2 Pattern
  • June 11, 2024: State Licensure, 1 deficiency cited report
    • C0000: Comment severity level 0
    • C0240: Resident Services Meals, Food Sanitation Rule severity level 2, scope L2 Widespread, corrected July 5, 2024
  • June 1, 2023: State Licensure, 1 deficiency cited report
    • C0000: Comment severity level 0
    • C0240: Resident Services Meals, Food Sanitation Rule severity level 2, scope L2 Widespread, corrected July 20, 2023
  • March 7, 2022: Validation, 5 deficiencies cited report
    • C0000: Comment severity level 0
    • C0240: Resident Services Meals, Food Sanitation Rule severity level 2, scope L2 Widespread, corrected May 13, 2022
    • C0242: Resident Services: Activities severity level 2, scope L2 Widespread, corrected May 13, 2022
    • C0270: Change of Condition and Monitoring severity level 2, scope L2 Pattern, corrected May 13, 2022
    • C0510: General Building Exterior severity level 2, scope L2 Widespread, corrected May 13, 2022
    • C0513: Doors, Walls, Elevators, Odors severity level 2, scope L2 Widespread, corrected May 13, 2022

Substantiated abuse or neglect

  • April 17, 2026: Failed to properly plan care Abuse: Neglect; Level 3 - Moderate harm or potential for serious harm; fine $500.00; report
    Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration); 411-054-0027 (Resident Rights and Protections); 411-054-0028 (Reporting and Investigating Abuse and Other Actions Affecting Resident Welfare); 411-054-0036 (Service Plan – General)
    State’s findings

    On or about April 17, 2026, the Alleged Victim (AV) experienced an unwitnessed fall after attempting to transfer without assistance. Based on facility documentation and interviews, AV activated his/her pendant alarm at approximately 3:25 PM and was found on the floor with a head injury and a forearm skin tear. AV is a known fall risk with a history of forgetting to use their call pendant, had multiple prior falls, including a head injury on February 26, 2026. Additional falls occurred after the April 17, 2026, incident with one fall on April 18, 2026, and another fall on April 19, 2026, with the April 19 incident involving another head injury. Despite repeated falls and documented risks, the facility did not implement additional or enhanced fall-prevention measures to mitigate AV's fall risk. The lack of adequate oversight and care planning resulted in continued falls and unreasonable discomfort to AV, constituting abuse by neglect as defined in OAR 411-020-0002(1)(b)(A)(i).

  • December 8, 2025: Failed to provide a safe medication administration system Abuse: Neglect; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; fine $338.00; report
    Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration); 411-054-0027 (Resident Rights and Protections); 411-054-0028 (Reporting and Investigating Abuse and Other Actions Affecting Resident Welfare); 411-054-0055 (Medications and Treatments)
    State’s findings

    On or about December 8, 2025, Alleged Perpetrator 2 (AP2) submitted a refill request for the Alleged Victim’s (AV) Proton Pump Inhibitor medication via fax. On December 11, 2025, it was discovered that AP2 had faxed the refill request to the incorrect pharmacy. Based on facility documentation and staff interviews, AV’s Medication Administration Record (MAR) listed three different pharmacies for AV’s medication refills, which contributed to the error. The investigation determined that AP2’s error resulted from the facility’s failure to provide adequate oversight and maintain an accurate and consistent MAR for AV, rather than any lack of ability on AP2’s part to perform assigned job duties. The facility’s failure to maintain a safe and reliable medication administration system caused AV unreasonable discomfort, which is a violation of resident rights, is considered neglect of care and constitutes abuse. AP2 was initially alleged to have neglected AV; however, the investigation determined that no abuse occurred by AP2.

  • October 14, 2025: Failed to provide a safe medication administration system Abuse: Neglect; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; fine $450.00; report
    Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration); 411-054-0027 (Resident Rights and Protections); 411-054-0028 (Reporting and Investigating Abuse and Other Actions Affecting Resident Welfare); 411-054-0055 (Medications and Treatments)
    State’s findings

    On January 21, 2026, ODHS Adult Protective Services (APS) completed investigation #00433403 and issued a written investigation report, which is incorporated here by reference. Alleged Victim (AV) lived at Respondent’s facility. Based on facility documentation and interviews, on or about October 14, 2025, AV ran out of his/her restless leg syndrome medication and was without this medication until October 17, 2025. The facility is responsible for managing AV’s medications, including monitoring supply levels and ensuring timely reordering. Based on facility documentation and staff interviews, the facility did not order AV’s medication for restless leg syndrome in a timely manner, resulting in missed doses, causing AV unnecessary pain and discomfort which is a violation of resident's rights, is considered neglect of care, which constitutes abuse.

  • August 21, 2025: Failed to properly plan care Abuse: Neglect; Level 3 - Moderate harm or potential for serious harm; fine $500.00; report
    Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration); 411-054-0027 (Resident Rights and Protections); 411-054-0028 (Reporting and Investigating Abuse and Other Actions Affecting Resident Welfare); 411-054-0036 (Service Plan – General); 411-054-0040 (Change of Condition and Monitoring)
    State’s findings

    In August 2025, a significant failure in care occurred involving an Alleged Victim (AV) who was under the facility's care at time of incident. On August 11, 2025, AV reported a pressure sore on his/her coccyx area and described experiencing sharp pain at the site. Facility documentation and staff interviews confirmed the presence of a wound measuring approximately 1.5 cm by 0.4 cm, with no visible drainage. Despite this discovery, the facility did not initiate wound care or document AV’s change in condition. AV was seen by his/her physician on or about August 21, 2025, who confirmed the wound on AV coccyx area. By then, the condition had worsened, resulting in unnecessary discomfort and physical harm to AV. The facility’s failure to provide timely and appropriate care is a violation of resident rights, is considered neglect of care which constitutes abuse.

  • August 12, 2025: Failed to provide a safe medication administration system Abuse: Neglect; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; fine $375.00; report
    Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration); 411-054-0027 (Resident Rights and Protections); 411-054-0028 (Reporting and Investigating Abuse and Other Actions Affecting Resident Welfare); 411-054-0055 (Medications and Treatments)
    State’s findings

    On August 20, 2025, ODHS Adult Protective Services (APS) initiated investigation #00421228 and issued a written investigation report, which is incorporated here by reference. Alleged Victim (AV) lived at Respondent’s facility. The facility failed to ensure a safe medication administration system to ensure that the Alleged Victim (AV) received his/her prescribed diuretic medications as ordered. The facility's failure to provide a safe medication system caused AV unreasonable discomfort and increased shortness of breath, is a violation of resident rights, is considered neglect of care and constitutes abuse.

  • August 25, 2024: Failure to provide a system that prevents theft or misuse of medication Abuse: Neglect; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; fine $225.00; report
    Rules: 411-054-0027 (Resident Rights and Protections); 411-054-0028 (Reporting and Investigating Abuse and Other Actions Affecting Resident Welfare); 411-054-0055 (Medications and Treatments)
    State’s findings

    Alleged Victim (AV) relies on the facility to administer his/her medications. On or about August 25, 2024, while doing the narcotic count, staff discovered that 2.5mL of AV’s pain medication was missing. All the staff’s drug test came back negative for narcotics. The facility failed to provide a system that prevents theft of medication, which is a violation of resident rights, is neglect of care and constitutes abuse.

Substantiated licensing violations

  • April 17, 2026: Failed to use an ABST Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
    Rules: 411-054-0037 (Acuity-Based Staffing Tool)
    State’s findings

    The facility failed to have an updated Acuity-Based Staffing Tool (ABST) that accurately reflected the resident population and their care needs. Inconsistencies were identified between the resident roster, care plans, and the data entered into the ABST. An investigation determined this is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.

  • April 3, 2026: Failed to use an ABST Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
    Rules: 411-054-0037 (Acuity-Based Staffing Tool)
    State’s findings

    The facility failed to have an updated Acuity-Based Staffing Tool (ABST) that accurately reflected the resident population and their care needs. Inconsistencies were identified between the resident roster, care plans, and the data entered into the ABST. An investigation determined this is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.

  • January 5, 2026: Failed to provide a safe medication administration system Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
    Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration); 411-054-0055 (Medications and Treatments)
    State’s findings

    On January 23, 2026, ODHS Adult Protective Services (APS) completed investigation #00449853 and issued a written report which is incorporated by reference. The Alleged Victim (AV) resided at the Respondent’s facility. On or about January 5, 2026, AV left the facility on a scheduled departure. The facility failed to provide AV with prescribed medication upon departure, as required by facility protocol and Oregon Administrative Rules. Although AV did not experience any negative health outcome, this failure constitutes non-compliance with safe medication administration standards, which is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.

  • December 16, 2025: Failed to provide a safe medication administration system Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
    Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration); 411-054-0055 (Medications and Treatments)
    State’s findings

    On December 11, 2025, medications were found in the Alleged Victim’s (AV) room. The facility conducted a thorough cleaning and search of the room that same day. Despite this, additional medications, equivalent to two days’ worth, were discovered again in AV’s room on December 16, 2025. Based on facility documentation and interviews, AV's room had been fully searched on December 11, it was determined the medications found on December 16 came from doses that were to be administered to AV between December 12 and December 16, 2025. Medication administration records show that Alleged Perpetrator 2 (AP2) was responsible for administering AV’s medications on December 11, 12, and 15, 2025. AP2 did not watch AV swallow his/her medications. Between December 11, 2025, to December 16, 2025, AV experienced pain and discomfort as a result of not taking his/her medications as prescribed. AP2 failed to follow proper medication administration procedures by not watching AV swallow his/her medication, resulting in AV experiencing unreasonable discomfort. AP2's actions is considered neglect of care which constitutes abuse. The facility failed to provide a safe medication administration system for AV which is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.

  • December 16, 2025: Failed to provide a safe medication administration system Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
    Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration); 411-054-0055 (Medications and Treatments)
    State’s findings

    On December 11, 2025, medications were found in the Alleged Victim’s (AV) room. The facility conducted a thorough cleaning and search of the room that same day. Despite this, additional medications, equivalent to two days’ worth, were discovered again in AV’s room on December 16, 2025. Based on facility documentation and interviews, AV's room had been fully searched on December 11, it was determined the medications found on December 16 came from doses that were to be administered to AV between December 12 and December 16, 2025. Medication administration records show that Alleged Perpetrator 3 (AP3) was responsible for administering AV’s medications on December 13, and 14, 2025. AP3 did not watch AV swallow his/her medications. Between December 13, 2025, to December 14, 2025, AV experienced pain and discomfort as a result of not taking his/her medications as prescribed. AP3 failed to follow proper medication administration procedures by not watching AV swallow his/her medication, resulting in AV experiencing unreasonable discomfort. AP3's actions is considered neglect of care which constitutes abuse. The facility failed to provide a safe medication administration system for AV which is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.

Show all 11
  • October 31, 2025: Failed to provide a safe medication administration system Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
    Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration); 411-054-0055 (Medications and Treatments)
    State’s findings

    On or about October 30, 2025, and October 31, 2025, Alleged Victim (AV) missed his/her scheduled dose of blood pressure medication due to medication not being ordered in a timely manner. AV did have high blood pressure on October 31, 2025; however, there were no long-term effects to AV for missing two doses of blood pressure medication. Although AV did not suffer af negative outcome as a result of not receiving his/her medication as ordered, the facility did fail to provide a safe medication administration system which is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.

  • September 26, 2025: Failed to provide a safe medication administration system Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
    Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration); 411-054-0055 (Medications and Treatments)
    State’s findings

    On or about September 26, 2025, the Alleged Victim’s (AV) blood pressure medication was ordered by AV's physician to be increased from 5 mg to 10 mg. The facility did not accurately process and implement this physician’s order. As a result, AV did not receive the increased dosage until September 30, 2025, four days after the order was issued. During this period, AV experienced elevated blood pressure readings but did not report pain or suffer adverse side effects. Although AV did not experience a negative health outcome, the facility failed to administer AV's medication as prescribed which is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules. Alleged Perpetrator 2 (AP2) allegedly neglected AV. An investigation determined no abuse occurred by AP2.

  • September 10, 2025: Failed to provide a safe medication administration system Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
    Rules: 411-054-0055 (Medications and Treatments)
    State’s findings

    On September 10, 2025, it was reported that Alleged Victim (AV) did not receive his/her routinely scheduled agitation medication as prescribed, and AV did not receive his/her as needed dose of agitation medication when requested. At time of incident, Alleged Perpetrator 2 (AP2) was working his/her first shift at the facility and AP2 was responsible to administer AV's medication as ordered. Following a review of facility documentation and staff interviews, it was determined that AV did receive their routine agitation medication; however, the dose was not documented in AV's Medication Administration Record (MAR). This failure was due to AP2 not being properly trained on the facility’s medication administration system. AV did not experience a negative outcome at time of incident; however, the facility failed to ensure adequate training and proper oversight of AV's medication administration which is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules. AP2 allegedly neglected AV. An investigation determined no abuse occurred by AP2.

  • September 10, 2025: Failed to provide a safe medication administration system Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
    Rules: 411-054-0055 (Medications and Treatments)
    State’s findings

    Based on interview and record review, conducted during a Licensing Complaint Unit (LCU) site visit on 12/18/25, the facility’s failure to carry out medication and treatment orders as prescribed was substantiated for 1 of 1 sampled residents (#1). Findings include, but are not limited to: Resident 1’s Physician Orders dated 08/18/25 indicated the following: · Furosemide: take 1 tablet (20 mg) by mouth daily; · Ipratropium-albuterol: take 3mLs by nebulization 4 times daily; and · Haloperidol: take 75mL by mouth every 8 hours. Resident 1’s Medication Administration Records (MARs) dated 08/01/25 through 09/15/25 indicated the following: · Furosemide was not administered due to being unavailable from 08/12/25 through 08/18/25; · Iprart/Albut .5-2.5mg was not administered due to being unavailable on 08/18/25 at 12:00 pm, 4:00 pm, and 8:00 pm; and on 08/19/25 at 8:00 am and 12:00pm; and · Haloperidol was blank on the MAR on 09/10/25 at 1:00 pm. Resident 1’s Progress Notes dated 08/10/25 through 09/15/25 indicated the following: · On 08/19/25, resident was placed on alert charting for missed Furosemide, with the outcome being increased Shortness of Breath; and · On 09/12/25, resident was placed on alert charting for missed Haloperidol on 09/10/25, with the outcome being restlessness and agitation. Staff 1 (Executive Director) indicated the following: · Furosemide had been ordered and was in the facility during the alleged time period, but had been placed in the incorrect location and had not been administered for several days as a result; · It was discovered that the resident was not receiving Furosemide when they started exhibiting symptoms; · The nebulizer treatments had been missed due to having run out on 08/18/25; · Staff 1 had witnessed a med tech bringing Haloperidol to Resident 1 late on 09/10/25, but the med tech had not filled out the MAR; and · The agency med tech on 09/10/25 did not have a key to the med cart for part of their shift. Resident 1 was no longer in the facility and was unavailable to be interviewed. The facility’s failure to carry out medication and treatment orders is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules..

  • June 23, 2022: Failed to provide service Licensing Violation; Level 1 - No harm or potential for minor harm; report
    Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration); 411-054-0070 (Staffing Requirements and Training)
    State’s findings

    During onsite record review on 6/28/2022 Compliance Specialist (CS) found the schedule indicated there should have been one med aide (MA) and two caregivers (CG) on duty. On 6/19/2022 there was one MA and a front desk worker with CG competency working. Interviews of Staff #1-2 (S1-S2) state that on 6/19/2022 there were only two staff members working for a four-hour period and knew with were short staffed. S2 states that the call light system is on a pager and a close by facilities frequencies can mess up their system on occasions. This making it hard to know how long call lights have been going off for. CS interviewed Resident #1 (R1) stated that the facility is understaffed and had to wait on hour after pushing their call light.

  • June 19, 2022: Failed to assure a qualified caregiver was present Licensing Violation; Level 1 - No harm or potential for minor harm; report
    Rules: 411-054-0070 (Staffing Requirements and Training)
    State’s findings

    During onsite record review on 6/28/2022 Compliance Specialist (CS) found the schedule indicated there should have been one med aide (MA) and two caregivers (CG) on duty. On 6/19/2022 there was one MA and a front desk worker with CG competency working. Interviews of Staff #1-2 (S1-S2) state that on 6/19/2022 there were only two staff members working for a four-hour period and knew with were short staffed. S2 states that the call light system is on a pager and a close by facilities frequencies can mess up their system on occasions. This making it hard to know how long call lights have been going off for.

Read the full record on the state’s site →

ODHS lists only substantiated violations: “either a substantiated instance of abuse or a licensing violation. Open investigations and complaints that are being appealed by the provider are not listed.” Oregon counts neglect as a form of abuse; see the state’s definitions of abuse. Each violation shows the level ODHS gives it, in the state’s words (for example “2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm”), and any fine ODHS assessed. Inspection citations show the state’s severity level and scope, and the date ODHS recorded the problem as corrected when it lists one. Rule names come from the Oregon Administrative Rules. ODHS: “Formal regulatory actions can range from a condition placed upon a license due to non-compliance or a notice to revoke a license.” This community is licensed for 32 residents; larger communities are inspected and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Oregon Department of Human Services, Long-Term Care Licensing, data as of October 15, 2026, showing the last five years. Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.

License and ownershipActive license
License type
Residential Care Facility
License number
50R085
License status
Active
Licensed capacity
32

Source: Oregon state licensing records (agency listing), retrieved 2026-09-09. Licensing status is a matter of public record; it is not a quality rating.

Staff pay and workplace safety3 OSHA inspections, 16 violations cited

Federal records about how the employer here treats its staff.

OSHA workplace safety inspections

OSHA inspects workplaces for staff safety, such as lifting, needles, chemicals and workplace violence. It does not inspect resident care.

  • Nov 3, 2025: complaint inspection, partial (health). Case open. 14 violations cited (13 serious, 1 other). Penalties: $14,928 proposed, $14,928 now. OSHA record. OSHA recorded the employer as 317742273 - Mt Angel Towers Oreg LTD.
    Details
    • Serious: Cited rule 1926.1101(k)(9)(iv)(a). Penalty $8,474 proposed, $8,474 now. To be fixed by Jan 20, 2026.
    • Serious: Cited rule 1926.1101(g)(10). Penalty $0 proposed, $0 now. To be fixed by Jan 20, 2026.
    • Serious: Cited rule 1926.1101(f)(2)(i). Penalty $0 proposed, $0 now. To be fixed by Jan 20, 2026.
    • Serious: Cited rule 1926.1101(g)(1)(ii). Penalty $0 proposed, $0 now. To be fixed by Feb 23, 2026.
    • Serious: Cited rule 1926.1101(k)(8)(iii). Penalty $0 proposed, $0 now. To be fixed by Feb 23, 2026.
    • Serious: Cited rule 1926.1101(k)(2)(i). Penalty $0 proposed, $0 now. To be fixed by Jan 20, 2026.
    • Serious: Cited rule 1926.1101(g)(7)(iv). Penalty $0 proposed, $0 now. To be fixed by Feb 23, 2026.
    • Serious: Respiratory protection (respirators, N95 fit testing) (1910.134(c)(1)). Penalty $4,236 proposed, $4,236 now. To be fixed by Jan 20, 2026.
    • Serious: Respiratory protection (respirators, N95 fit testing) (1910.134(e)(1)). Penalty $0 proposed, $0 now. To be fixed by Jan 20, 2026.
    • Serious: Respiratory protection (respirators, N95 fit testing) (1910.134(f)(2)). Penalty $0 proposed, $0 now. To be fixed by Jan 20, 2026.
    • Serious: Respiratory protection (respirators, N95 fit testing) (1910.134(h)(1)(i)). Penalty $0 proposed, $0 now. To be fixed by Feb 23, 2026.
    • Serious: Respiratory protection (respirators, N95 fit testing) (1910.134(g)(1)(i)(a)). Penalty $0 proposed, $0 now. To be fixed by Feb 23, 2026.
    • Serious: Cited rule OAR. Penalty $2,118 proposed, $2,118 now. To be fixed by Jan 6, 2026.
    • Other than serious: Cited rule OAR. Penalty $100 proposed, $100 now. To be fixed by Jan 6, 2026.
  • Oct 2, 2023: programmed (planned) inspection, complete (safety). Case closed Feb 6, 2024. 2 violations cited (2 other). Penalties: $100 proposed, $100 now. OSHA record. OSHA recorded the employer as 317734345 - Mt Angel Towers Oreg LTD.
    Details
    • Other than serious: Safe electrical work practices (1910.333(b)(2)(i)). Penalty $0 proposed, $0 now. To be fixed by Nov 27, 2023.
    • Other than serious: Cited rule OAR. Penalty $100 proposed, $100 now. To be fixed by Nov 27, 2023.
  • Nov 30, 2017: programmed (planned) inspection, complete (safety). Case closed Nov 30, 2017. No violations cited. OSHA record. OSHA recorded the employer as 317718913 - Mt Angel Towers Oreg LTD.

Source: U.S. Department of Labor OSHA enforcement data, as of Oct 15, 2026, inspections since 2016. Penalties can change while a case is open or contested.

Location and nearby careNearest hospital 4.2 mi, nursing home 0.7 mi, pharmacy 4.0 mi
Nearest hospital with an emergency room
Legacy Silverton Medical Center, Silverton. 4.2 miles away, straight line.
Nearest Medicare nursing home
Mt Angel Health and Rehabilitation, Mount Angel. 0.7 miles away, straight line.
Nearest home health agency office
Providence Benedictine Home Health, Mount Angel. 0.7 miles away, straight line. Agencies travel to clients, so ask which ones serve this address.
Nearest pharmacy
Pill Box. 4.0 miles away, straight line. From OpenStreetMap, which does not list every pharmacy, so one may be closer.
Area
USDA classes ZIP code 97362 as metropolitan (metropolitan low commuting).
Dialysis within 15 miles
Davita Woodburn Dialysis, Woodburn, 7.1 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 3 of 5 stars)
Davita Ne Salem Dialysis, Salem, 10.9 miles away, straight line (has a shift starting after 5 pm; CMS rating 2 of 5 stars)
Fmc Qci Salem, Salem, 13.2 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 2 of 5 stars)
Hospice
14 Medicare hospices tell CMS they serve ZIP code 97362.
Willamette Vital Health, office in Salem, 15.6 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 4 of 5 stars)
Serenity Hospice, office in Salem, 15.9 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 2 of 5 stars)
Vistariver Hospice, office in Wilsonville, 18.4 miles away, straight line
Nearest geriatric medicine practice
Legacy Clinics LLC, Tualatin. 21.6 miles away, straight line. 4 geriatric medicine doctors listed there.

Distances are straight lines from the community, not driving distance. Hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors come from CMS provider data (CMS, hospital list updated Jul 22, 2026). Star ratings are CMS’s own.

Emergency and natural hazard riskFEMA overall risk relatively high; outside FEMA's high-risk flood areas

Public hazard maps for this location. Ask the community about its emergency plan, its generator and where residents would go in an evacuation.

Flood zone
Outside the high and moderate risk flood areas on FEMA's flood map (Zone X, minimal flood hazard, or not studied). (FEMA flood map)
FEMA National Risk Index
Overall: relatively high. By hazard: inland flooding relatively high, wildfire very low, tornado very low, heat wave relatively high, earthquake very high. These are FEMA’s ratings for the census tract, compared with tracts nationwide. (FEMA, December 2025)

A flood zone describes the map at this point, not the building's elevation. In an emergency, follow the local emergency management agency.

Questions to ask on a tour10 questions picked for this community from its record

Picked for this community from its record. Ask them in person and write down the answers.

  1. The state recorded a finding in May 2026. What was it, and how was it fixed?
  2. What does the base rate include, and when did rates last go up?
  3. How many caregivers are on duty during the day and at night?
  4. What happens if care needs increase? When would someone need to move?
  5. What fees are charged at move-in?
  6. How do you tell families about falls, illness or changes?
  7. How long have the executive director and the head of care been here?
  8. Who gives medications, and what training do they have?
  9. For what reasons can a resident be asked to leave?
  10. Is the apartment held during a hospital stay, and at what cost?
What we checked13 public sources we searched, with dates

Every public source we searched for this community. “Nothing on record” means we found no record that matched it. A record can be missed when a name or address differs.

SourceData as ofWhat we found
Oregon Department of Human Services, Long-Term Care Licensing inspection recordsOct 15, 2026See above
Oregon Medicaid provider listSep 9, 2026Not on the state list we checked. These lists are often incomplete.
U.S. Department of Labor wage and hour casesOct 15, 2026Nothing on record
OSHA workplace safety inspections since 2016Oct 15, 2026See above
FEMA flood mapSee above
USDA wildfire riskApr 15, 2026Not shown: FEMA rates wildfire risk here very low
FEMA National Risk IndexSee above
CMS hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors; OpenStreetMap pharmaciesSee above
HUD Multifamily Properties - AssistedJul 6, 2026Nothing on record
State Veterans Homes (NASVH directory)Sep 20, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Hospice - General InformationAug 19, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Home Health Care AgenciesMay 27, 2026Nothing on record
The community’s own websiteSee above
Common questionsAnswers to 4 questions families ask
What type of care does Mt Angel Towers provide?

Mt Angel Towers is licensed by the state of Oregon for assisted living in Mount Angel, Oregon. Its licensed capacity is 32 residents.

Does Lilisity rate Mt Angel Towers?

No. We publish state licensing details for Mt Angel Towers but no score, rating, or ranking. Only communities on the Top Communities list or with a Senior Living Alliance Excellence Award, both based on phone-verified resident and family interviews, are ranked.

How much does Mt Angel Towers cost?

Assisted Living in Oregon typically starts at $4,600 to $5,800 a month. Based on 108 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price. Mt Angel Towers does not publish its prices.

How do I contact Mt Angel Towers?

Use Mt Angel Towers's website, mountangeltowers.com, or visit at One Towers Lane Box 2120, Mount Angel, OR 97362.

Choosing assisted livingOur care guide: what to look for, what it costs, how families pay, and more questions to ask (PDF)

Report a wrong fact

How Lilisity works. The only scores or rankings Lilisity publishes are the Top Communities list and the Excellence Awards, both built from phone-verified resident and family interviews. Communities can pay Lilisity a flat monthly fee to manage their own listing: photos, prices, contact details, and receiving the inquiries families choose to send them. The fee is the same no matter how many families contact them or move in. Senior Living Alliance, which runs Lilisity, offers the same listing to its member communities as part of their membership; members pay SLA for its resident and family interview program. No community pays Lilisity per inquiry, per referral or per move-in. Payment never changes a testimonial, a rating, or the order of search results. The "Nearby Senior Living Alliance communities" box shows member communities only. How we verify testimonials · How we are paid