Lilisity

Assisted Living and Memory Care

Chantele's Loving Touch Memory Care

1128 W Central Avenue, Sutherlin, OR 97479 · Map
Licensed for 45 residents

State license active
Is this your community? Claim this listing

Chantele's Loving Touch Memory Care is a state-licensed assisted living, memory care community in Sutherlin, Oregon. It is licensed for 45 residents. Lilisity publishes no score or ranking for this community; the details below come from the state licensing record.

Assisted LivingAlso memory care
45 residentsLicensed capacity
State licensedResidential care facility (memory care endorsement)
$4,600 to $5,800/moTypical assisted living start in Oregon, from 108 communities that publish prices

Prices

This community does not publish its prices.

Area costs

Assisted Living in Oregon typically starts at $4,600 to $5,800 a month. Based on 108 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price.
Memory Care in Oregon typically starts at $6,000 to $8,200 a month. Based on 78 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price.

Lilisity’s independent report

What the public record shows

Gathered by Lilisity from state and federal sources. Communities can’t edit this part of the page.

State inspections

20Deficiencies cited
9Substantiated violations

Last inspection: Jun 10, 2025. See the record

License

Active, 45 residents

Residential Care Facility (Memory Care endorsement) 50R351.

Nearest emergency room

10.3 miles

Mercy Medical Center, rated 4 of 5 stars by CMS.

Side by side with nearby communities

The 4 nearest communities that offer assisted living, by straight-line distance. Prices are starting prices each community publishes; we never show estimates.

CommunityDistanceLicensed capacityPublished starting priceLicenseInspection citations
Chantele's Loving Touch Memory Care this community45Not publishedActive20 deficiencies, 9 violations
Timber Town Living0.0 mi47Not publishedActive12 deficiencies, 24 violations
Applegate Place1.9 mi36Not publishedActive26 deficiencies, 10 violations
Brookdale Roseburg9.7 miNot listed$10,675/moActive8 deficiencies, 5 violations
Curry Manor10.0 mi62Not publishedActive36 deficiencies, 61 violations
State inspection record20 deficiencies, 9 violations
Last inspection
June 10, 2025
Inspections
4, 20 deficiencies cited
Substantiated abuse
5
Substantiated licensing violations
4
Regulatory actions
0
Fines assessed
$2,251.00 (5 violations)
Current owner since
November 1, 2019

Inspections

  • June 10, 2025: Kitchen, 2 deficiencies cited report
    • C0240: Resident Services Meals, Food Sanitation Rule severity level 2, scope L2 Widespread
    • Z0142: Administration Compliance severity level 2, scope L2 Widespread
  • October 9, 2024: Re-Licensure, 16 deficiencies cited report
    • C0231: Reporting & Investigating Abuse-Other Action severity level 2, scope L2 Pattern
    • C0260: Service Plan: General severity level 2, scope L2 Pattern
    • C0270: Change of Condition and Monitoring severity level 2, scope L2 Pattern
    • C0280: Resident Health Services severity level 2, scope L2 Pattern
    • C0302: Systems: Tracking Control Substances severity level 2, scope L2 Isolated
    Show all 16
    • C0310: Systems: Medication Administration severity level 2, scope L2 Pattern
    • C0363: Acuity Based Staffing Tool - Updates & Staffing Plan severity level 2, scope L2 Pattern
    • C0372: Training Within 30 Days of Hire ? Direct Care Staff severity level 2, scope L2 Pattern
    • C0422: Fire and Life Safety: Training for Residents severity level 2, scope L2 Widespread
    • C0513: Doors, Walls, Elevators, Odors severity level 2, scope L2 Widespread
    • H1518: Individual Door Locks: Key Access severity level 2, scope L2 Widespread
    • Z0142: Administration Compliance severity level 2, scope L2 Widespread
    • Z0155: Staff Training Requirements severity level 2, scope L2 Pattern
    • Z0162: Compliance with Rules Health Care severity level 2, scope L2 Pattern
    • Z0164: Activities severity level 2, scope L2 Pattern
    • Z0173: Secure Outdoor Recreation Area severity level 2, scope L2 Pattern
  • June 24, 2024: State Licensure, 0 deficiencies cited report
    • C0000: Comment severity level 0
  • March 15, 2023: State Licensure, 2 deficiencies cited report
    • C0000: Comment severity level 0
    • C0240: Resident Services Meals, Food Sanitation Rule severity level 2, scope L2 Widespread, corrected May 14, 2023
    • Z0142: Administration Compliance severity level 2, scope L2 Widespread, corrected May 14, 2023

Substantiated abuse or neglect

  • May 6, 2025: Failed to provide safe environment Abuse: Neglect; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; fine $375.00; report
    Rules: 411-054-0027 (Resident Rights and Protections); 411-054-0028 (Reporting and Investigating Abuse and Other Actions Affecting Resident Welfare); 411-054-0030 (Resident Services)
    State’s findings

    Alleged Victim (AV) and Witness 1 (W1) were placed in a shared room despite W1’s documented history of confusion, disorientation, and physical aggression, as well as a prior concern voiced by W1’s family regarding W1 having a roommate. On or about May 6, 2025, an altercation occurred between AV and W1 in the shared room, resulting in AV sustaining a skin tear and a cut above the eye. The evidence supports that the failure to adequately assess and mitigate foreseeable risk related to this room placement resulted in physical harm to AV, which is a violation of resident rights, is neglect of care and constitutes abuse.

  • April 5, 2025: Failed to provide a safe medication administration system Abuse: Neglect; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; fine $188.00; report
    Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration); 411-054-0027 (Resident Rights and Protections); 411-054-0028 (Reporting and Investigating Abuse and Other Actions Affecting Resident Welfare); 411-054-0055 (Medications and Treatments); 411-054-0070 (Staffing Requirements and Training)
    State’s findings

    On or about April 5, 2025, the Alleged Victim (AV) received medication of another resident. Alleged Perpetrator #2 (AP2) became distracted while passing medication and pulled incorrect medication and administered it to AV. AV had a reaction to the incorrect medication, including chest pain and trouble breathing, was sent to the emergency room and was diagnosed with an overdose. AP2's actions caused physical and emotional distress to AV, which is a violation of resident rights, is considered neglect of care and constitutes abuse. Respondent failed to ensure staff were properly trained prior to providing medication administration to residents. This constitutes abuse by neglect, as outlined in OAR 411-020-0002(1)(b)(A)(i).

  • December 4, 2024: Failed to provide safe environment Abuse: Neglect; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; fine $188.00; report
    Rules: 411-054-0027 (Resident Rights and Protections); 411-054-0028 (Reporting and Investigating Abuse and Other Actions Affecting Resident Welfare)
    State’s findings

    Alleged Victim (AV) is known to exit seek. Staff are to redirect with offering 1:1 time to AV, per AV’s care plan. On or about December 4, 2024, Witness 1 (W1) received a phone call from Witness 2 (W2) at local facility. W2 called to inform W1 that AV was outside across the street of facility at a local business. W2 called to inform W1 that W2 was getting AV and bringing AV back to facility. W2 and W1 then assisted AV back into the facility. W1 then helped AV take off AV's jacket and assessed AV for any injuries. AV had scattered bluish/purplish discoloration on AV's left forearm along with a skin tear. Two separate blackish, and purplish marks on AV's left forearm, one of discoloration marks was large about 4-inches in length, and other was about the size of a quarter. AV was found with rip in skin and larger discoloration mark. Skin tear about the size of a fifty-cent piece. Three strip stitching covering skin-tear on AV's left forearm. AV was previous seen 20-25 minutes before leaving the facility. Alleged Perpetrator 2 (AP2) had gone out the front door, and the front door was shut, unfortunately there is about a 15-second lag on doors locking. AP2 did not hear or see AV come out of facility door behind staff member and AP2 did not confirm the door was secured before walking away from the door. AP2 failed to ensure that facility door locked when leaving, which resulted in AV eloping outside of facility and receiving a skin tear, which is neglect of care and constitutes abuse. The facility failed to provide a safe environment for AV, which is a violation of resident rights, is neglect of care and constitutes abuse.

  • January 29, 2023: Failed to follow care plan Abuse: Neglect; Level 3 - Moderate harm or potential for serious harm; fine $1,125.00; report
    Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration); 411-054-0027 (Resident Rights and Protections); 411-054-0028 (Reporting and Investigating Abuse and Other Actions Affecting Resident Welfare); 411-054-0036 (Service Plan – General)
    State’s findings

    Alleged Victim (AV) relies on the facility for his/her care. AV is a high fall risk and is care planned to have a bed alarm. On or about January 29, 2023, AV was assisted to bed by facility staff and was later found on the floor in his/her room after a fall, resulting in a fractured hip. During investigation it was discovered that AV's bed alarm was turned off prior to AV's fall. The facility failed to follow AV care plan, which is a violation of resident’s rights is neglect of care and constitutes abuse.

  • April 15, 2022: Failed to follow care plan Abuse: Neglect; Level 3 - Moderate harm or potential for serious harm; fine $375.00; report
    Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration); 411-054-0027 (Resident Rights and Protections); 411-054-0028 (Reporting and Investigating Abuse and Other Actions Affecting Resident Welfare); 411-054-0030 (Resident Services); 411-054-0036 (Service Plan – General)
    State’s findings

    The facility failed to follow both Alleged Victim’s (AV) and Witness #1's (W1) care plan to be monitored at all times in common areas and redirected due to behaviors. Between April 14, 2022, and April 28, 2022, there were at least three (3) altercations between W1 and AV resulting in AV falling. The falls resulted in AV’s repeated unreasonable discomfort and on at least one occasion facial bruising. The facility failed to provide a safe environment for AV, which is a violation of resident rights, is considered neglect of care and constitutes abuse.

Substantiated licensing violations

  • February 19, 2026: Failed to provide service Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
    Rules: 411-054-0027 (Resident Rights and Protections); 411-054-0028 (Reporting and Investigating Abuse and Other Actions Affecting Resident Welfare)
    State’s findings

    Alleged Victim (AV) relies on the facility for his/her care needs. Witness (W1) stated that staff had found Alleged Perpetrator 2 (AP2) sleeping inside of the facility breakroom at the time the AV was found on the floor of (AV) bedroom. AP2 stated that (AP2) set a timer at the time that (AP2) was falling asleep although the alarm did not go off and (AP2) did not know how long (AP2) had slept. AP2 failed to provide service to AV by falling asleep, which is neglect of care and constitutes abuse. The facility failed to ensure AV received service, which is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.

  • July 1, 2025: Failed to provide service Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
    Rules: 411-054-0027 (Resident Rights and Protections); 411-054-0028 (Reporting and Investigating Abuse and Other Actions Affecting Resident Welfare); 411-054-0036 (Service Plan – General)
    State’s findings

    Alleged Victim (AV) relies on the facility for his/her care needs. AV was taken into the restroom by Alleged Perpetrator 2 (AP2) to change pants after spilling juice on AV at the table. AV was also assisted to the toilet. AP2 reported he/she had AV hanging on to the safety bar and turned to retrieve a brief for AV. When AP2 looked back, AV had left go of the safety bar and was leaning to the side while pulling AV’s brief. It was determined via video footage that the care plan was not followed by AP2, and no gait belt was present when AV was transferred into the bathroom and was not utilized for AV’s transfer to the toilet as indicated in AV’s care plan, which is neglect of care and constitutes abuse. The facility failed to assure the care plan was being followed, which is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.

  • December 13, 2024: Failed to staff as indicated by ABST Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
    Rules: 411-054-0070 (Staffing Requirements and Training)
    State’s findings

    The facility failed to consistently staff to the levels, intensity and qualifications indicated by the Acuity-Based Staffing Tool (ABST). Inconsistencies were identified between the staffing schedule and the data produced by the ABST. Facility is not currently staffing to the levels as indicated by the ABST to meet the scheduled and unscheduled needs of residents. An investigation determined this is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules. Corrective Action taken on related allegation.

  • October 14, 2024: Failed to staff as indicated by ABST Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
    Rules: 411-054-0037 (Acuity-Based Staffing Tool); 411-054-0070 (Staffing Requirements and Training)
    State’s findings

    The facility failed to consistently staff to the levels, intensity and qualifications indicated by the Acuity-Based Staffing Tool (ABST). Inconsistencies were identified between the staffing schedule and the data produced by the ABST. Facility is not currently staffing to the levels as indicated by the ABST to meet the scheduled and unscheduled needs of residents. An investigation determined this is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.

Read the full record on the state’s site →

ODHS lists only substantiated violations: “either a substantiated instance of abuse or a licensing violation. Open investigations and complaints that are being appealed by the provider are not listed.” Oregon counts neglect as a form of abuse; see the state’s definitions of abuse. Each violation shows the level ODHS gives it, in the state’s words (for example “2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm”), and any fine ODHS assessed. Inspection citations show the state’s severity level and scope, and the date ODHS recorded the problem as corrected when it lists one. Rule names come from the Oregon Administrative Rules. ODHS: “Formal regulatory actions can range from a condition placed upon a license due to non-compliance or a notice to revoke a license.” This community is licensed for 45 residents; larger communities are inspected and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Oregon Department of Human Services, Long-Term Care Licensing, data as of October 15, 2026, showing the last five years. Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.

License and ownershipActive license
License type
Residential Care Facility (Memory Care endorsement)
License number
50R351
License status
Active
Licensed capacity
45

Source: Oregon state licensing records (agency listing), retrieved 2026-09-09. Licensing status is a matter of public record; it is not a quality rating.

Paying with Medicaid and other programsOn the Oregon list of Medicaid providers (2026)

On the Oregon list of Medicaid providers. Listed as Chantele's Loving Touch Memory Care under Accepts Medicaid (ODHS licensing record). (state list, as of Sep 9, 2026)

Being on the list means the community has taken part in the program. Ask whether it has a Medicaid opening now, and how many residents it serves on Medicaid.

Staff pay and workplace safety5 OSHA inspections, 5 violations cited

Federal records about how the employer here treats its staff.

OSHA workplace safety inspections

OSHA inspects workplaces for staff safety, such as lifting, needles, chemicals and workplace violence. It does not inspect resident care.

  • Jun 12, 2026: complaint inspection, partial (health). Case open. 1 violation cited (1 other). Penalties: $0 proposed, $0 now. OSHA record. OSHA recorded the employer as 317744505 - Loving Touch Operations LLC.
    Details
    • Other than serious: Cited rule OAR. Penalty $0 proposed, $0 now. To be fixed by Sep 28, 2026.
  • May 13, 2026: programmed (planned) inspection, complete (safety). Case open. No violations cited. OSHA record. OSHA recorded the employer as 317744174 - Loving Touch Operations LLC.
  • Feb 20, 2026: programmed (planned) inspection, complete (safety). Case open. 3 violations cited (2 serious, 1 other). Penalties: $2,428 proposed, $2,428 now. OSHA record. OSHA recorded the employer as 317743348 - Timber Town Living INC. Matched by street address; the name OSHA recorded differs from the community's.
    Details
    • Serious: Cited rule OAR. Penalty $1,214 proposed, $1,214 now. To be fixed by Apr 13, 2026.
    • Serious: Bloodborne pathogens (needles, blood and body fluids) (1910.1030(f)(1)(i)). Penalty $1,214 proposed, $1,214 now. To be fixed by Apr 13, 2026.
    • Other than serious: Cited rule OAR. Penalty $0 proposed, $0 now. To be fixed by Apr 13, 2026.
  • Dec 30, 2024: complaint inspection, partial (health). Case closed Oct 27, 2025. 1 violation cited (1 other). Penalties: $0 proposed, $0 now. OSHA record. OSHA recorded the employer as 317738974 - Loving Touch Operations LLC.
    Details
    • Other than serious: Cited rule OAR. Penalty $0 proposed, $0 now. To be fixed by Feb 27, 2025.
  • Jan 9, 2020: programmed (planned) inspection, complete (safety). Case closed Jan 10, 2020. No violations cited. OSHA record. OSHA recorded the employer as 317726720 - Chanteles Loving Touch INC.

Source: U.S. Department of Labor OSHA enforcement data, as of Oct 15, 2026, inspections since 2016. Penalties can change while a case is open or contested.

Location and nearby careNearest hospital 10.3 mi, nursing home 11.0 mi, pharmacy 10.9 mi
Nearest hospital with an emergency room
Mercy Medical Center, Roseburg. 10.3 miles away, straight line. CMS overall hospital rating: 4 of 5 stars.
Nearest Medicare nursing home
Rose Haven Nursing Center, Roseburg. 11.0 miles away, straight line.
Nearest home health agency office
Amedisys Home Health Care, Roseburg. 10.9 miles away, straight line. Agencies travel to clients, so ask which ones serve this address.
Nearest pharmacy
Walgreens. 10.9 miles away, straight line. From OpenStreetMap, which does not list every pharmacy, so one may be closer.
Area
USDA classes ZIP code 97479 as micropolitan (micropolitan high commuting).
Dialysis within 15 miles
Innovative Renal Care Roseburg, Roseburg, 10.4 miles away, straight line
Davita Roseburg Mercy Dialysis, Roseburg, 10.6 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 1 of 5 stars)
Hospice
3 Medicare hospices tell CMS they serve ZIP code 97479.
Mercy Medical Center Hospice, office in Roseburg, 10.2 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 4 of 5 stars)
Amedisys Hospice Care, office in Roseburg, 12.2 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 4 of 5 stars)
Nearest geriatric medicine practice
Peacehealth Medical Group, Eugene. 49.0 miles away, straight line. 2 geriatric medicine doctors listed there.

Distances are straight lines from the community, not driving distance. Hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors come from CMS provider data (CMS, hospital list updated Jul 22, 2026). Star ratings are CMS’s own.

Emergency and natural hazard riskFEMA overall risk relatively moderate; outside FEMA's high-risk flood areas

Public hazard maps for this location. Ask the community about its emergency plan, its generator and where residents would go in an evacuation.

Flood zone
Outside the high and moderate risk flood areas on FEMA's flood map (Zone X, minimal flood hazard, or not studied). (FEMA flood map)
FEMA National Risk Index
Overall: relatively moderate. By hazard: inland flooding relatively moderate, wildfire relatively low, tornado very low, heat wave relatively moderate, earthquake relatively moderate. These are FEMA’s ratings for the census tract, compared with tracts nationwide. (FEMA, December 2025)

A flood zone describes the map at this point, not the building's elevation. In an emergency, follow the local emergency management agency.

Questions to ask on a tour10 questions picked for this community from its record

Picked for this community from its record. Ask them in person and write down the answers.

  1. The state recorded a finding in February 2026. What was it, and how was it fixed?
  2. What does the base rate include, and when did rates last go up?
  3. How many caregivers work in memory care during the day, the evening and overnight, and for how many residents?
  4. What dementia training does each caregiver get before working alone, and every year after?
  5. How do staff respond when a resident is agitated, frightened or tries to leave?
  6. How many caregivers are on duty during the day and at night?
  7. What happens if care needs increase? When would someone need to move?
  8. What fees are charged at move-in?
  9. How do you tell families about falls, illness or changes?
  10. How long have the executive director and the head of care been here?
What we checked13 public sources we searched, with dates

Every public source we searched for this community. “Nothing on record” means we found no record that matched it. A record can be missed when a name or address differs.

SourceData as ofWhat we found
Oregon Department of Human Services, Long-Term Care Licensing inspection recordsOct 15, 2026See above
Oregon Medicaid provider listSep 9, 2026See above
U.S. Department of Labor wage and hour casesOct 15, 2026Nothing on record
OSHA workplace safety inspections since 2016Oct 15, 2026See above
FEMA flood mapSee above
USDA wildfire riskApr 15, 2026Not shown: FEMA rates wildfire risk here relatively low
FEMA National Risk IndexSee above
CMS hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors; OpenStreetMap pharmaciesSee above
HUD Multifamily Properties - AssistedJul 6, 2026Nothing on record
State Veterans Homes (NASVH directory)Sep 20, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Hospice - General InformationAug 19, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Home Health Care AgenciesMay 27, 2026Nothing on record
The community’s own websiteNo plain statements of services found
Common questionsAnswers to 4 questions families ask
What type of care does Chantele's Loving Touch Memory Care provide?

Chantele's Loving Touch Memory Care is licensed by the state of Oregon for assisted living, memory care in Sutherlin, Oregon. Its licensed capacity is 45 residents.

Does Lilisity rate Chantele's Loving Touch Memory Care?

No. We publish state licensing details for Chantele's Loving Touch Memory Care but no score, rating, or ranking. Only communities on the Top Communities list or with a Senior Living Alliance Excellence Award, both based on phone-verified resident and family interviews, are ranked.

How much does Chantele's Loving Touch Memory Care cost?

Assisted Living in Oregon typically starts at $4,600 to $5,800 a month. Based on 108 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price. Chantele's Loving Touch Memory Care does not publish its prices.

How do I contact Chantele's Loving Touch Memory Care?

Use Chantele's Loving Touch Memory Care's website, chanteles.com, or visit at 1128 W Central Avenue, Sutherlin, OR 97479.

Choosing assisted livingOur care guide: what to look for, what it costs, how families pay, and more questions to ask (PDF)

Report a wrong fact

How Lilisity works. The only scores or rankings Lilisity publishes are the Top Communities list and the Excellence Awards, both built from phone-verified resident and family interviews. Communities can pay Lilisity a flat monthly fee to manage their own listing: photos, prices, contact details, and receiving the inquiries families choose to send them. The fee is the same no matter how many families contact them or move in. Senior Living Alliance, which runs Lilisity, offers the same listing to its member communities as part of their membership; members pay SLA for its resident and family interview program. No community pays Lilisity per inquiry, per referral or per move-in. Payment never changes a testimonial, a rating, or the order of search results. The "Nearby Senior Living Alliance communities" box shows member communities only. How we verify testimonials · How we are paid