Lilisity

Assisted Living and Memory Care

Avamere at Bethany

16360 Nw Avamere Ct, Portland, OR 97229 · Map
Licensed for 26 residents

State license active
Is this your community? Claim this listing

Avamere at Bethany is a state-licensed assisted living, memory care community in Portland, Oregon. It is licensed for 26 residents. Lilisity publishes no score or ranking for this community; the details below come from the state licensing record.

Assisted LivingAlso memory care
26 residentsLicensed capacity
State licensedResidential care facility (memory care endorsement)
From $5,270/moStarting price

Prices

Starting prices the community publishes, with the date we checked each one and a link to where it is published. Care charges are usually added after an assessment.

CareStarting atChecked
Assisted Living$5,270 /moOct 12, 2026
Memory Care$7,915 /moOct 12, 2026

Area costs

Assisted Living in Washington County typically starts at $5,050 to $5,600 a month. Based on 33 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price.
Memory Care in Washington County typically starts at $6,650 to $8,100 a month. Based on 24 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price.

Care and services

From the community’s website

What Avamere at Bethany says about itself, quoted from its own site. We have not checked these claims against licensing records. Ask about each one on a tour.

  • Offers respite or short-term stays. Respite Care in Bethany, Oregon | Avamere at Bethany (page, checked Oct 15, 2026)
  • Provides transportation. In-house transportation (page, checked Oct 12, 2026)
  • Apartment types named: two-bedroom, cottage or villa. 2 Bedroom cottage: Starting at $6,973 /mo (page, checked Oct 12, 2026)
  • Community fee: charged. Community fee $2,500 1-time (page, checked Oct 12, 2026)

Lilisity’s independent report

What the public record shows

Gathered by Lilisity from state and federal sources. Communities can’t edit this part of the page.

State inspections

40Deficiencies cited
30Substantiated violations

Last inspection: Mar 6, 2025. See the record

License

Active, 26 residents

Residential Care Facility (Memory Care endorsement) 50R320.

Nearest emergency room

1.6 miles

Kaiser Foundation Hospital Westside, rated 4 of 5 stars by CMS.

Side by side with nearby communities

The 4 nearest communities that offer assisted living, by straight-line distance. Prices are starting prices each community publishes; we never show estimates.

CommunityDistanceLicensed capacityPublished starting priceLicenseInspection citations
Avamere at Bethany this community26$5,270/moActive40 deficiencies, 30 violations
Avamere at Bethany Assisted Living Facility0.0 mi90$5,270/moActive29 deficiencies, 22 violations
Laurel Parc at Bethany0.5 mi153Not publishedActive15 deficiencies, 9 violations
Clearwater Beaverton1.9 mi123$5,649/moActive4 deficiencies, 14 violations
Brookdale Beaverton2.1 mi60$6,930/moActive20 deficiencies, 17 violations
State inspection record40 deficiencies, 30 violations
Last inspection
March 6, 2025
Inspections
6, 40 deficiencies cited
Substantiated abuse
7
Substantiated licensing violations
23
Regulatory actions
1
Fines assessed
$4,501.00 (7 violations)
Current owner since
August 29, 2003

License conditions and other regulatory actions

  • July 17, 2023 to March 18, 2025: License Condition, Failed to use an ABST RCFCD23-00841; incident: OR0003914101
    The facility failed to fully implement and update an Acuity Based Staffing Tool (ABST) in accordance with OAR 411-054-0037.
    Rules: 411-054-0037 (Acuity-Based Staffing Tool)

Inspections

  • March 6, 2025: Re-Licensure, 13 deficiencies cited report
    • C0252: Resident Move-in & Evaluation: Res Evaluation severity level 2, scope L2 Pattern
    • C0260: Service Plan: General severity level 2, scope L2 Pattern
    • C0270: Change of Condition and Monitoring severity level 3, scope L3 Isolated
    • C0280: Resident Health Services severity level 3, scope L3 Isolated
    • C0290: Res Hlth Srvc: On- and Off-Site Health Srvc severity level 2, scope L2 Pattern
    Show all 13
    • C0303: Systems: Treatment Orders severity level 2, scope L2 Isolated
    • C0340: Restraints and Supportive Devices severity level 2, scope L2 Isolated
    • C0372: Training Within 30 Days of Hire ? Direct Care Staff severity level 2, scope L2 Pattern
    • C0422: Fire and Life Safety: Training for Residents severity level 2, scope L2 Widespread
    • C0555: Call Sys, Exit Dr Alarm, Phones, TV, or Cable severity level 2, scope L2 Widespread
    • Z0142: Administration Compliance severity level 2, scope L2 Widespread
    • Z0155: Staff Training Requirements severity level 2, scope L2 Pattern
    • Z0162: Compliance with Rules Health Care severity level 3, scope L3 Isolated
  • July 10, 2024: State Licensure, 2 deficiencies cited report
    • C0000: Comment severity level 0
    • C0240: Resident Services Meals, Food Sanitation Rule severity level 2, scope L2 Widespread, corrected November 4, 2024
    • C0455: Inspections and Investigation: Insp Interval severity level 2, scope L2 Widespread, corrected November 4, 2024
    • Z0142: Administration Compliance severity level 2, scope L2 Widespread, corrected November 4, 2024
  • June 20, 2023: State Licensure, 2 deficiencies cited report
    • C0000: Comment severity level 0
    • C0240: Resident Services Meals, Food Sanitation Rule severity level 2, scope L2 Widespread, corrected August 18, 2023
    • Z0142: Administration Compliance severity level 2, scope L2 Widespread, corrected August 18, 2023
  • April 27, 2023: Licensure Complaint, 6 deficiencies cited report
    • C0010: Licensing Complaint Investigation severity level 2, scope L2 Isolated
    • C0154: Facility Administration: Policy & Procedure severity level 2, scope L2 Isolated
    • C0260: Service Plan: General severity level 2, scope L2 Isolated
    • C0303: Systems: Treatment Orders severity level 2, scope L2 Isolated
    • C0361: Acuity-Based Staffing Tool severity level 2, scope L2 Widespread
    • C0372: Training Within 30 Days: Direct Care Staff severity level 2, scope L2 Isolated
    • C0513: Doors, Walls, Elevators, Odors severity level 2, scope L2 Isolated
  • August 8, 2022: Complaint Investig., 2 deficiencies cited report
    • C0010: Licensing Complaint Investigation severity level 2, scope L2 Isolated
    • C0160: Reasonable Precautions severity level 2, scope L2 Isolated
    • C0513: Doors, Walls, Elevators, Odors severity level 2, scope L2 Isolated
  • March 14, 2022: Validation, 15 deficiencies cited report
    • C0000: Comment severity level 0
    • C0231: Reporting & Investigating Abuse-Other Action severity level 2, scope L2 Isolated, corrected May 15, 2022
    • C0252: Resident Move-In and Eval: Res Evaluation severity level 2, scope L2 Pattern, corrected May 15, 2022
    • C0260: Service Plan: General severity level 2, scope L2 Pattern, corrected May 15, 2022
    • C0270: Change of Condition and Monitoring severity level 3, scope L3 Isolated, corrected May 15, 2022
    Show all 16
    • C0290: Res Hlth Srvc: On- and Off-Site Health Srvc severity level 2, scope L2 Pattern, corrected May 15, 2022
    • C0303: Systems: Treatment Orders severity level 2, scope L2 Pattern, corrected May 15, 2022
    • C0310: Systems: Medication Administration severity level 2, scope L2 Pattern, corrected May 15, 2022
    • C0330: Systems: Psychotropic Medication severity level 2, scope L2 Isolated, corrected May 15, 2022
    • C0420: Fire and Life Safety: Safety severity level 2, scope L2 Widespread, corrected May 15, 2022
    • C0422: Fire and Life Safety: Training For Residents severity level 2, scope L2 Widespread, corrected May 15, 2022
    • C0513: Doors, Walls, Elevators, Odors severity level 2, scope L2 Widespread, corrected May 15, 2022
    • Z0142: Administration Compliance severity level 2, scope L2 Widespread, corrected May 15, 2022
    • Z0155: Staff Training Requirements severity level 2, scope L2 Pattern, corrected May 15, 2022
    • Z0162: Compliance With Rules Health Care severity level 3, scope L3 Isolated, corrected May 15, 2022
    • Z0164: Activities severity level 2, scope L2 Pattern, corrected May 15, 2022

Substantiated abuse or neglect

  • November 21, 2025: Failed to assure food safety Abuse: Neglect; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; fine $188.00; report
    Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration); 411-054-0027 (Resident Rights and Protections); 411-054-0028 (Reporting and Investigating Abuse and Other Actions Affecting Resident Welfare); 411-054-0030 (Resident Services); 411-054-0036 (Service Plan – General)
    State’s findings

    On or about November 21, 2025, Alleged Victim (AV), a resident of a secure residential care facility, was served and consumed food containing shellfish despite having a documented shellfish allergy. AV did not recall having this allergy when food was served and had already eaten some of the food before staff identified the error. Upon discovery, staff monitored AV for signs of an allergic reaction (e.g., hives, swelling, respiratory distress). Based on facility documentation and interviews, AV’s shellfish allergy was known and documented in his/her care plan. Staff interviews indicated AV’s dietary restrictions were not adequately supervised during mealtime which placed AV at risk of harm. The facility's failure to ensure proper oversight and monitoring of AV’s dietary needs, is a violation of resident rights, is considered neglect of care which constitutes abuse.

  • November 17, 2025: Failed to provide safe environment Abuse: Neglect; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; fine $188.00; report
    Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration); 411-054-0027 (Resident Rights and Protections); 411-054-0028 (Reporting and Investigating Abuse and Other Actions Affecting Resident Welfare); 411-054-0036 (Service Plan – General)
    State’s findings

    On or about November 17, 2025, the facility failed to provide appropriate supervision to the Alleged Victim (AV) according to his/her care needs. The failure resulted in AV eloping the secured building, without staff knowledge, placing him/her at risk of harm which is a violation of resident rights, is considered neglect of care and constitutes abuse.

  • August 10, 2024: Failed to properly plan care Abuse: Neglect; Level 4 - Serious harm, death, imminent danger or chronic regulatory noncompliance; fine $1,500.00; report
    Rules: 411-054-0027 (Resident Rights and Protections); 411-054-0028 (Reporting and Investigating Abuse and Other Actions Affecting Resident Welfare); 411-054-0036 (Service Plan – General); 411-054-0040 (Change of Condition and Monitoring)
    State’s findings

    The facility failed to implement interventions and appropriately care plan related to the Alleged Victim's (AV) fall history. On or about August 10, 2024, AV was found on the floor of their room crying out in pain and holding their head and hip. AV was transferred to the hospital and was diagnosed with a fractured left femur. AV was admitted to the hospital from August 10, 2024, and discharged on August 19, 2024. According to hospital records, AV had a surgical procedure to treat AV's broken thigh bone in which a metal rod was inserted with screws to stabilize the bone. Based on facility documentation and interviews, AV had two prior falls dated July 26, 2024, and August 1, 2024. An investigation determined the facility failed to identify AV as a fall risk on AV's care plan and failed to implement sufficient fall interventions to mitigate AV's fall risk. The facility's failure to properly care plan for AV's fall risk caused unreasonable discomfort and severe pain which is a violation of resident rights, is considered neglect of care and constitutes abuse.

  • December 3, 2021: Failed to provide a safe medication administration system Abuse: Neglect; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; fine $375.00; report
    Rules: 411-054-0027 (Resident Rights and Protections); 411-054-0028 (Reporting and Investigating Abuse and Other Actions Affecting Resident Welfare); 411-054-0055 (Medications and Treatments)
    State’s findings

    The facility failed to provide a safe medication administration system for Alleged Victim (AV) by failing to administer essential medications as ordered. The facility's failure is a violation of resident rights, is considered neglect of care and constitutes abuse.

  • December 3, 2021: Failed to provide a safe medication administration system Abuse: Neglect; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; fine $375.00; report
    Rules: 411-054-0027 (Resident Rights and Protections); 411-054-0028 (Reporting and Investigating Abuse and Other Actions Affecting Resident Welfare); 411-054-0055 (Medications and Treatments)
    State’s findings

    The facility failed to provide a safe medication administration system for Alleged Victim (AV) by failing to administer essential medications as ordered. The facility's failure is a violation of resident rights, is considered neglect of care and constitutes abuse.

  • November 30, 2021: Failed to provide a safe medication administration system Abuse: Neglect; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; fine $375.00; report
    Rules: 411-054-0027 (Resident Rights and Protections); 411-054-0028 (Reporting and Investigating Abuse and Other Actions Affecting Resident Welfare); 411-054-0055 (Medications and Treatments)
    State’s findings

    The facility failed to provide a safe medication administration system for Alleged Victim (AV) by failing to administer essential medications as ordered. The facility's failure is a violation of resident rights, is considered neglect of care and constitutes abuse.

  • November 5, 2021: Failed to provide a safe medication administration system Abuse: Neglect; Level 3 - Moderate harm or potential for serious harm; fine $1,500.00; report
    Rules: 411-054-0027 (Resident Rights and Protections); 411-054-0028 (Reporting and Investigating Abuse and Other Actions Affecting Resident Welfare); 411-054-0055 (Medications and Treatments)
    State’s findings

    The facility failed to provide a safe medication administration system to ensure the Alleged Victim’s (AV) medications were administered as ordered which resulted in AV being transported to hospital for observation on November 7, 2021. Based on facility documentation and interviews, facility missed medication dosages for AV on November 1, 2021, November 3, 2021, November 5, 2021, and November 6, 2021. The failure resulted in unreasonable discomfort, which is a violation of resident rights, is considered neglect of care and constitutes abuse.

Substantiated licensing violations

  • July 28, 2026: Failed to provide safe environment Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
    Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration)
    State’s findings

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during a site visit on 07/28/26, the facility failed to maintain reasonable precautions against conditions that could threaten the health, safety, or welfare of residents. This issue was substantiated for 1 of 1 sampled residents (#1). Findings include, but are not limited to the following: A review of Incident Report #3653 dated 07/04/26 regarding the elopement of Resident 1 (R1) indicated that she/he exited the secured unit by following a visitor out of the main door unnoticed by Staff. Staff became aware of the elopement after a visitor outside the building notified staff inside the building, Additinal information indicated in the report, R1 is continuously and actively trying to leave the community and she/he wanders, roams and looks for people/things that are not there. Observations: The door alarm for the main entrance to the Memory Care unit was observed plugged into a hallway outlet. Staff 2 (Med Tech) reported that when residents unplugged the alarm and staff reconnected it, the alarm volume would reset to the lowest level unless manually adjusted. At the lowest level the alarm could not be heard if not in the immediate area where the alarm was placed. The south door was observed to have an 8-second delay before locking after closing and did not have a functioning audible alarm. This door led to a hallway connecting to an elevator on the east side and a hallway on the west side that exited outside near the dumpster and parking lot. R1 was known as an active exit seeker, and she/he would often try to open doors. Maintenance staff adjusted the timing of the south door to lock within 3 seconds after the code was entered. This adjustment appeared reasonable to ensure the door locked promptly after staff or visitors exited and could not be opened again without the code. Staff Interviews: Staff 1 (Regional Director) stated she/he was unaware that the south Memory Care door had an extended delay before locking after code entry. Staff 1 indicated she/he would work with maintenance to put covers over the alarms in the hallway and have batteries checked frequently to prevent alarm failure. Staff 2 (Med Tech) stated that the door R1 exited to where she/he was found in the parking lot was typically locked without delay but acknowledged that there had been occasions when it did not. Staff 2 reported that residents sometimes unpluged the door alarms and that, when reconnected, the alarms reset to a low volume unless staff adjusted them. Staff 3 (Life Enrichment Coordinator) stated that the main door had a delay before locking after someone entered or exited. Staff 3 believed that the south door alarm battery needed replacement. Staff 5 (Caregiver) stated that the door where R1 exited when she/he had eloped did not lock immediately upon closing on the day of the elopement. Staff 5 reported that door the alarms sometimes failed due to battery issues. Staff 5 notified management, and maintenance subsequently adjusted the door lock timing and replaced the alarm battery. The facility failed to ensure reasonable precautions were taken to protect the resident from conditions when a resident eloped from the facility by providing secure doors that locked timely to prevent resident from following visitors out of the facility and having functioning door alarms is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.

  • July 7, 2026: Failed to provide a safe medication administration system Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
    Rules: 411-054-0055 (Medications and Treatments)
    State’s findings

    Based on interview, and record reviews conducted during a site visit on 07/28/26, the facility failed to ensure medications were carried out as prescribed and physician’s orders were followed was substantiated for 1 of 1 sampled residents (#1). Findings include but are not limited to the following: On 07/28/26 following documents were reviewed for Resident 1 (R1): Incident report #3660 dated 07/07/26 indicated Lorazepam 1mg on 07/07/26 @19:18 instead of Lorazepam 0.5mg. Note on 07/10/26 stated bubble cards for both dosages were in the narcotics drawer. Note indicated on 07/10/26 that staff would be re-educated on medication administration. Progress notes effective date 07/07/26 9:48, for Medication error. Resident was given Lorazepam 1mg instead of 0.5mg as per order. Resident was found sleeping in another resident's bed. MAR indicated a D/C date of 07/02/26 for Lorazepman 1mg. Physician’s Orders dated 07/02/26 with a received date of 07/03/26 indicated an order to start Lorazepam oral tablet 0.5mg 2 times daily. Interview with Staff 2 (Med Tech) stated she/he caught an error when doing the medication count on 07/08/26 for day shift and the bubble pack for 1mg Lorazepam should have had a sticker with bold red letters “Directions change refer to chart”. Staff 2 stated R1 changed from 0.5mg am and 1mg in pm to 0.5mg twice per day on 07/03/26. Staff 2 showed Compliance Specialist an example of the red sticker that would indicate a change of medication. The facility’s failure to ensure R1’s medication and physician’s orders were carried out as prescribed is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.

  • July 4, 2026: Failed to provide safe environment Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
    Rules: 411-054-0036 (Service Plan – General)
    State’s findings

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews conducted during a site visit on 07/28/26, the facility failed to ensure implementation of services for 1 of 1 resident (#1) sampled. Findings include, but are not limited to: Observations: Resident 1 (R1) she/he was observed by compliance specialist exiting another resident’s room unsupervised, carrying a pair of shoes that were not her/his. R1 had put the shoes in a basket outside her/his room. R1 went into her/his room and closed the door. A staff member returned the shoes to the other resident’s room. Record review: - ALF/RCF Facility Safety Plan dated 07/13/26 indicated the facility would increase supervision and safety checks. - R1's service plan last completed 06/04/26 and 07/13/26 under safety indicated she/he would have safety checks of 2-3 hours. Safety checks were not increased on 07/13/26 R1's her/his service plan but was indicated the facility would increase per safety plan. - Incident report #3653 Elopement dated 07/04/26 indicated R1 eloped from the secured memory care facility, and she/he was an active exit seeker. Interview(s): - Staff 6 (Caregiver) stated R1 she/he was on two-hour checks but should have increased frequency as she/he was a very active exit seeker who frequently entered other residents’ rooms and removed their personal belongings and this could have caused conflict with other residents. Staff 6 believed that R1's care plan should be updated to help she/he with tasks for redirection. Staff 6 stated she/he think R1’s service plan should be updated for her/his anxiety. - Staff 5 (Caregiver) stated R1 was on 2–3-hour safety checks and that was not enough for she/he as R1 was an active exit seeker. Staff 5 indicated R1 was often up most nights and she/he slept a lot of the day. Staff 5 indicated R1 was looking for snacks in the kitchen area, and she/he pulled very hard on locked cupboards causing damage. Staff 5 stated R1 had put things in the microwave that are not appropriate when she/he was unsupervised. - R1 was not available for interview. The facility’s failure to ensure implementation of services to meet resident’s needs is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.

  • July 4, 2026: Failed to use an ABST Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
    Rules: 411-054-0037 (Acuity-Based Staffing Tool)
    State’s findings

    Based on interview and record review conducted during a site visit on 07/28/26 the facility failed to complete or update and review the Acuity-Based Staffing Tool (ABST) evaluation for each resident quarterly as required. Findings include but are not limited to: The facility’s census was 21. A review of the facility’s last ABST evaluation update per resident indicated 5 of 21 residents had not been updated quarterly as required as of 07/04/26. The facility’s failure to complete or update and review the Acuity-Based Staffing Tool (ABST) evaluation for each resident quarterly as required is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.

  • July 4, 2026: Failed to staff as indicated by ABST Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
    Rules: 411-054-0037 (Acuity-Based Staffing Tool)
    State’s findings

    Based on interview and record review, conducted during a site visit on 07/28/26, the facility failed to have qualified awake direct care staff, sufficient in number to meet the 24-hour scheduled and/or unscheduled needs of each resident. Findings include, but are not limited to: The facility’s posted staffing plan indicated: For Day shift, 5 direct care staff; For Swing shift, 4 direct care staff; and For Night shift, 3 direct care staff. The facility’s staffing schedule dated 06/28/26-07/04/26, indicated the facility was not staffing to its posted staffing plan for 3 of 21 shifts reviewed. Interview with Staff 5 (Caregiver) stated Resident 1 (R1) was often up all night and had damaged cupboards as she/he is looking for snacks. R1 had been able to plug the microwave back in and she/he had put things in that are not appropriate for the appliance. Staff 5 believed this was due to R1 being up all night and she/he was unsupervised. ?The facility's failure to have qualified awake direct care staff, sufficient in number to meet the 24-hour scheduled and unscheduled needs of each resident is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.

Show all 23
  • July 4, 2026: Failed to report potential or suspected abuse Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
    Rules: 411-054-0028 (Reporting and Investigating Abuse and Other Actions Affecting Resident Welfare)
    State’s findings

    The facility failed to ensure the facility administrator, or designee, immediately notified the local Department office, or the local AAA, of any incident of abuse or suspected abuse, including events overheard or witnessed by observation. The facility's failure is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.

  • April 10, 2026: Failed to use an ABST Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
    Rules: 411-054-0037 (Acuity-Based Staffing Tool)
    State’s findings

    The facility failed to have an updated Acuity-Based Staffing Tool (ABST) that accurately reflected the resident population and their care needs. Inconsistencies were identified between the resident roster, care plans, and the data entered into the ABST. An investigation determined this is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.

  • April 8, 2026: Failed to use an ABST Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
    Rules: 411-054-0037 (Acuity-Based Staffing Tool)
    State’s findings

    On or about April 8, 2026, the facility failed to have an updated Acuity-Based Staffing Tool (ABST) that accurately reflected the resident population and their care needs. Inconsistencies were identified between the resident roster, care plans, and the data entered into the ABST. An investigation determined this is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.

  • December 3, 2025: Failed to cooperate with an investigation Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
    Rules: 411-054-0105 (Inspections and Investigations)
    State’s findings

    Based on interview and record review, conducted during an investigation on 05/22/26, the facility’s failure to provide records to the Department upon request was substantiated. Findings include but are not limited to: A review of electronic communication, dated 12/02/25, indicated the Department requested documents related to the facility’s Acuity-Based Staffing Tool (ABST) alleged event date 11/21/25. The facility had not provided all requested documentation by the due date of 12/03/25. The findings were reviewed with and acknowledged by Staff 1 on 05/22/26. The facility’s failure to provide records to the Department upon request is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.

  • November 22, 2025: Failed to provide safe environment Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
    Rules: 411-054-0105 (Inspections and Investigations)
    State’s findings

    Based on interview and record review, conducted during an investigation on 05/22/26, the facility’s failure to provide records to the Department upon request was substantiated. Findings include but are not limited to: A review of electronic communication, dated 11/21/25, indicated the Department requested documents related to the facility’s Acuity-Based Staffing Tool (ABST) alleged event date 11/17/25. The facility had not provided all requested documentation by the due date of 11/22/25. The findings were reviewed with and acknowledged by Staff 1 on 05/22/26. The facility’s failure to provide records to the Department upon request is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.

  • October 21, 2025: Failed to submit timely or adequate staffing documentation Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
    Rules: 411-054-0105 (Inspections and Investigations)
    State’s findings

    The facility failed to provide records to the Department upon request in accordance with OAR 411-054-0105(1)(a), which is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.

  • October 10, 2025: Failed to make facility or resident records accessible Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
    Rules: 411-054-0105 (Inspections and Investigations)
    State’s findings

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide records to the Department upon request. The facility’s failure is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.

  • March 6, 2023: Failed to provide safe environment Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
    Rules: 411-054-0070 (Staffing Requirements and Training)
    State’s findings

    The facility failed to provide qualified awake direct care staff sufficient in number to meet the 24-hour scheduled and unscheduled needs of each resident. The facility's failure to provide a safe environment is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.

  • March 6, 2023: Failed to provide a safe medication administration system Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
    Rules: 411-054-0080 (Involuntary Move-out Criteria)
    State’s findings

    The facility failed to document that they have observed and evaluated the individual's ability to perform safe medication and treatment administration unsupervised. The facility's failure to provide a safe medication administration system is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.

  • February 1, 2023: Failed to properly plan care Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
    Rules: 411-054-0036 (Service Plan – General)
    State’s findings

    The facility failed to complete quarterly service plans. The facility's failure to properly care plan is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.

  • February 1, 2023: Failed to provide safe environment Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
    Rules: 411-054-0070 (Staffing Requirements and Training)
    State’s findings

    The facility failed to provide qualified awake direct care staff sufficient in number to meet the 24-hour scheduled and unscheduled needs of each resident. The facility's failure to provide a safe environment is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.

  • December 19, 2022: Failed to provide a safe medication administration system Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
    Rules: 411-054-0070 (Staffing Requirements and Training)
    State’s findings

    The facility failed to document that they have observed and evaluated the individual's ability to perform safe medication and treatment administration unsupervised. The facility's failure to provide a safe medication administration system is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.

  • December 19, 2022: Failed to provide safe environment Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
    Rules: 411-054-0200 (Residential Care Facility Building Requirements)
    State’s findings

    The facility failed to keep all equipment in good repair necessary for the health, safety, and comfort of the resident. The facility's failure to provide a safe environment is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.

  • December 19, 2022: Failed to provide safe environment Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
    Rules: 411-054-0200 (Residential Care Facility Building Requirements)
    State’s findings

    The facility failed to keep clean all interior and exterior materials and surfaces. The facility's failure to provide a safe environment is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.

  • December 19, 2022: Failed to provide safe environment Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
    Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration)
    State’s findings

    The facility failed to implement effective methods of responding to and resolving resident complaints. The facility's failure to provide a safe environment is a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.

  • November 16, 2022: Failed to provide safe environment Licensing Violation; Level 3 - Moderate harm or potential for serious harm; report
    Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration)
    State’s findings

    Amended on May 18, 2026, and re-issued to AP2: Alleged Perpetrator 2 (AP2) notified ODHS that AP2 did not receive the initial LOD mailed on April 25, 2023. AP2 confirmed that the LOD had been sent to a previous work address rather than AP2's home address. ODHS reviewed AP2’s request and determined that AP2 did not receive a valid notice of the substantiated abuse finding. Therefore, an amended notice with the correct address was mailed to AP2. Alleged Perpetrator 2 (AP2) failed to put sufficient interventions in place to protect Alleged Victim (AV) from Witness 7's (W7) inappropriate sexual advancements which caused a non-consensual sexual relationship between AV and W7 to occur. AV shared with AP2 that he/she felt coerced into having a sexual relationship with W7 and AP2 failed to immediately implement interventions to protect AV from W7. AP2's failure to provide a safe environment for AV is considered neglect of care which constitutes abuse. The facility failed to provide a safe environment for AV which a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.

  • August 5, 2022: Failed to provide safe environment Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
    Rules: 411-054-0200 (Residential Care Facility Building Requirements)
    State’s findings

    The facility failed to keep all equipment in good repair. An investigation determined the facility violated Oregon Administrative Rules.

  • August 5, 2022: Failed to provide infection control Licensing Violation; Level 2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm; report
    Rules: 411-054-0025 (Facility Administration)
    State’s findings

    Facility failed to exercise reasonable precautions against any condition that may threaten the health, safety, or welfare of residents. An investigation determined the facility violated Oregon Administrative Rules.

Read the full record on the state’s site →

ODHS lists only substantiated violations: “either a substantiated instance of abuse or a licensing violation. Open investigations and complaints that are being appealed by the provider are not listed.” Oregon counts neglect as a form of abuse; see the state’s definitions of abuse. Each violation shows the level ODHS gives it, in the state’s words (for example “2 - Minor harm or potential for moderate harm”), and any fine ODHS assessed. Inspection citations show the state’s severity level and scope, and the date ODHS recorded the problem as corrected when it lists one. Rule names come from the Oregon Administrative Rules. ODHS: “Formal regulatory actions can range from a condition placed upon a license due to non-compliance or a notice to revoke a license.” This community is licensed for 26 residents; larger communities are inspected and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Oregon Department of Human Services, Long-Term Care Licensing, data as of October 15, 2026, showing the last five years. Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.

License and ownershipActive license
License type
Residential Care Facility (Memory Care endorsement)
License number
50R320
License status
Active
Licensed capacity
26

Source: Oregon state licensing records (agency listing), retrieved 2026-09-09. Licensing status is a matter of public record; it is not a quality rating.

Paying with Medicaid and other programsOn the Oregon list of Medicaid providers (2026)

On the Oregon list of Medicaid providers. Listed as Avamere at Bethany under Accepts Medicaid (ODHS licensing record). (state list, as of Sep 9, 2026)

Being on the list means the community has taken part in the program. Ask whether it has a Medicaid opening now, and how many residents it serves on Medicaid.

Location and nearby careNearest hospital 1.6 mi, nursing home 4.5 mi, pharmacy 0.7 mi
Nearest hospital with an emergency room
Kaiser Foundation Hospital Westside, Hillsboro. 1.6 miles away, straight line. CMS overall hospital rating: 4 of 5 stars.
Nearest Medicare nursing home
Maryville, Beaverton. 4.5 miles away, straight line.
Nearest home health agency office
Divine Mercy Home Health, LLC, Beaverton. 5.2 miles away, straight line. Agencies travel to clients, so ask which ones serve this address.
Nearest pharmacy
Walgreens. 0.7 miles away, straight line. From OpenStreetMap, which does not list every pharmacy, so one may be closer.
Area
USDA classes ZIP code 97229 as metropolitan (metropolitan core).
Dialysis within 15 miles
Davita Cornell Road Dialysis, Beaverton, 1.2 miles away, straight line (has a shift starting after 5 pm; CMS rating 3 of 5 stars)
Pnrs Twin Oaks, Beaverton, 1.8 miles away, straight line (has a shift starting after 5 pm; CMS rating 3 of 5 stars)
Pnrs Beaverton, Beaverton, 3.4 miles away, straight line (has a shift starting after 5 pm; CMS rating 3 of 5 stars)
Hospice
26 Medicare hospices tell CMS they serve ZIP code 97229.
Care Partners, office in Portland, 2.6 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 4 of 5 stars)
Forest Park Healthcare At Home, office in Portland, 6.5 miles away, straight line
Gracious Care Hospice, office in Beaverton, 6.6 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 4 of 5 stars)
Nearest geriatric medicine practice
Legacy Clinics LLC, Portland. 5.3 miles away, straight line. 2 geriatric medicine doctors listed there.

Distances are straight lines from the community, not driving distance. Hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors come from CMS provider data (CMS, hospital list updated Jul 22, 2026). Star ratings are CMS’s own.

Emergency and natural hazard riskFEMA overall risk very low; outside FEMA's high-risk flood areas

Public hazard maps for this location. Ask the community about its emergency plan, its generator and where residents would go in an evacuation.

Flood zone
Outside the high and moderate risk flood areas on FEMA's flood map (Zone X, minimal flood hazard, or not studied). (FEMA flood map)
FEMA National Risk Index
Overall: very low. By hazard: inland flooding very low, wildfire very low, tornado very low, heat wave relatively moderate, earthquake relatively moderate. These are FEMA’s ratings for the census tract, compared with tracts nationwide. (FEMA, December 2025)

A flood zone describes the map at this point, not the building's elevation. In an emergency, follow the local emergency management agency.

Questions to ask on a tour10 questions picked for this community from its record

Picked for this community from its record. Ask them in person and write down the answers.

  1. The state recorded a finding in July 2026. What was it, and how was it fixed?
  2. Your published starting price is a base rate. What would the total monthly cost be for my parent's needs?
  3. How much have prices gone up in each of the last three years?
  4. How many caregivers work in memory care during the day, the evening and overnight, and for how many residents?
  5. What dementia training does each caregiver get before working alone, and every year after?
  6. How do staff respond when a resident is agitated, frightened or tries to leave?
  7. How many caregivers are on duty during the day and at night?
  8. What happens if care needs increase? When would someone need to move?
  9. What fees are charged at move-in?
  10. How do you tell families about falls, illness or changes?
What we checked13 public sources we searched, with dates

Every public source we searched for this community. “Nothing on record” means we found no record that matched it. A record can be missed when a name or address differs.

SourceData as ofWhat we found
Oregon Department of Human Services, Long-Term Care Licensing inspection recordsOct 15, 2026See above
Oregon Medicaid provider listSep 9, 2026See above
U.S. Department of Labor wage and hour casesOct 15, 2026Nothing on record
OSHA workplace safety inspections since 2016Oct 15, 2026Nothing on record
FEMA flood mapSee above
USDA wildfire riskApr 15, 2026Not shown: FEMA rates wildfire risk here very low
FEMA National Risk IndexSee above
CMS hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors; OpenStreetMap pharmaciesSee above
HUD Multifamily Properties - AssistedJul 6, 2026Nothing on record
State Veterans Homes (NASVH directory)Sep 20, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Hospice - General InformationAug 19, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Home Health Care AgenciesMay 27, 2026Nothing on record
The community’s own websiteSee above
Common questionsAnswers to 4 questions families ask
What type of care does Avamere at Bethany provide?

Avamere at Bethany is licensed by the state of Oregon for assisted living, memory care in Portland, Oregon. Its licensed capacity is 26 residents.

Does Lilisity rate Avamere at Bethany?

No. We publish state licensing details for Avamere at Bethany but no score, rating, or ranking. Only communities on the Top Communities list or with a Senior Living Alliance Excellence Award, both based on phone-verified resident and family interviews, are ranked.

How much does Avamere at Bethany cost?

Assisted Living in Washington County typically starts at $5,050 to $5,600 a month. Based on 33 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price. The starting prices it publishes are in the Prices section on this page.

How do I contact Avamere at Bethany?

Use Avamere at Bethany's website, avamereatbethany.com, or visit at 16360 Nw Avamere Ct, Portland, OR 97229.

Choosing assisted livingOur care guide: what to look for, what it costs, how families pay, and more questions to ask (PDF)

Report a wrong fact

How Lilisity works. The only scores or rankings Lilisity publishes are the Top Communities list and the Excellence Awards, both built from phone-verified resident and family interviews. Communities can pay Lilisity a flat monthly fee to manage their own listing: photos, prices, contact details, and receiving the inquiries families choose to send them. The fee is the same no matter how many families contact them or move in. Senior Living Alliance, which runs Lilisity, offers the same listing to its member communities as part of their membership; members pay SLA for its resident and family interview program. No community pays Lilisity per inquiry, per referral or per move-in. Payment never changes a testimonial, a rating, or the order of search results. The "Nearby Senior Living Alliance communities" box shows member communities only. How we verify testimonials · How we are paid