Lilisity

Assisted Living

Arbors Memory Care

2121 East Prater Way, Sparks, NV 89434 · Map
Licensed for 72 residents

State license active
Is this your community? Claim this listing

Arbors Memory Care is a state-licensed assisted living community in Sparks, Nevada. It is licensed for 72 residents. Lilisity publishes no score or ranking for this community; the details below come from the state licensing record.

Assisted LivingCare offered
72 residentsLicensed capacity
State licensedResidential facility for groups, since 2018
$3,500 to $5,300/moTypical assisted living start in Nevada, from 28 communities that publish prices

Prices

This community does not publish its prices.

Area costs

Assisted Living in Nevada typically starts at $3,500 to $5,300 a month. Based on 28 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price.

Lilisity’s independent report

What the public record shows

Gathered by Lilisity from state and federal sources. Communities can’t edit this part of the page.

State inspections

69Deficiencies cited
3Substantiated complaints

Last state inspection: Mar 25, 2026. See the record

License

Active, 72 residents

RESIDENTIAL FACILITY FOR GROUPS 8994-AGC-8, licensed since Jan 31, 2018.

Nearest emergency room

0.3 miles

Northern Nevada Medical Center, rated 3 of 5 stars by CMS.

Side by side with nearby communities

The 4 nearest communities that offer assisted living, by straight-line distance. Prices are starting prices each community publishes; we never show estimates.

CommunityDistanceLicensed capacityPublished starting priceLicenseInspection citations
Arbors Memory Care this community72Not publishedActive69 deficiencies, 3 substantiated complaints
Vista Adult Care0.2 mi7Not publishedActiveNo record
Brookdale Vista0.2 mi74$4,645/moActive59 deficiencies, 1 substantiated complaint
Sofia's Home0.5 mi5Not publishedActiveNo record
Waterfield Senior Living1.4 mi7Not publishedActiveNo record
State inspection record69 deficiencies, 3 substantiated complaints
Last state inspection
March 25, 2026 Annual licensure survey
State inspections
11
Deficiencies cited
69
Most recent grade from the state
D March 25, 2026
Complaints investigated
5: 3 substantiated, 2 not substantiated
State sanctions
0
  • License active since 2018

Most recent inspections with deficiencies

  • March 25, 2026, annual licensure survey: 12 deficiencies, grade D
    • Administrator's Responsiblities - Designation (NAC 449.194): Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to designate, in writing, one or more active employees to oversee the facility during the Administrator's absence and post the names in a public place within the facility, potentially affecting 36 of 36 residents. severity 1 (no harm likely), scope 3 (widespread); correction date March 26, 2026
    • Personnel File - TB Screening (NAC 449.200): Based on employee record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an employee obtained a pre-employment physical examination for 1 of 10 employees (Employee #5). severity 2 (potential for harm), scope 1 (isolated); correction date March 30, 2026
    • Health And Sanitation-Garbage (NAC 449.209): Based on observation and interview, facility failed to ensure, to the extent practicable, the premises of the facility must be kept free from offensive odors, affecting 36 of 36 residents. severity 2 (potential for harm), scope 3 (widespread); correction date April 10, 2026
    • Kitchens- Equipment Works; Clean And Sanitary (NAC 449.217): Based on observation, document review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure sanitization buckets were maintained in the kitchen area and the dishwasher was operating at required temperature. severity 2 (potential for harm), scope 3 (widespread); correction date March 30, 2026
    • Supervision and Treatment of Residents (NAC 449.259): Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to have a resident or their responsible party, and Administrator signatures on initial person-centered service plans for 4 of 10 sampled residents (Resident #1, #6, #7, and #9) severity 2 (potential for harm), scope 2 (pattern); correction date April 20, 2026
    • Supervision and Treatment of Residents (NAC 449.259): Based on clinical record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a person-centered service plan (care plan) contained interventions for a resident with dementia/memory loss for 1 of 10 sampled residents (Resident #7). correction date July 20, 2026
    • and 6 more in the report
  • October 21, 2025, grading re-survey, facility reported incident investigation: 2 deficiencies, grade A
    • Elder Abuse Training (NRS 449.160): Based on personnel record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure initial elder abuse prevention training was completed timely for 1 of 6 sampled employees (Employee #1). severity 2 (potential for harm), scope 1 (isolated)
    • Annual Assessment of History of Each Resident (NRS 449.1845): Based on clinical record review and interview, the Administrator failed to ensure an initial Physician Placement Determination was accurate prior to admitting a resident to the facility for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #2). severity 2 (potential for harm), scope 1 (isolated); correction date October 29, 2025
  • April 29, 2025, complaint investigation, annual licensure survey: 8 deficiencies, grade C
    • Elder Abuse Training (NRS 449.093): Based on personnel record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure annual elder abuse prevention training was completed timely for 1 of 10 sampled employees (Employee #9). severity 2 (potential for harm), scope 1 (isolated); correction date April 29, 2025
    • Personnel File - 1st Aid & CPR (NAC 449.200): Based on interview, personnel record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and first aid training was completed timely for 1 of 10 sampled employees (Employee #7). severity 2 (potential for harm), scope 1 (isolated); correction date May 29, 2025
    • First Aid & CPR (NAC 449.231): Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure 3 of 3 first aid kits contained the required supplies. severity 2 (potential for harm), scope 3 (widespread); correction date May 23, 2025
    • Care to Persons with Dementia (NAC 449.2768): Based on interview and personnel record review, the facility failed to ensure two hours of dementia training was completed within 40 hours of the employee's start date at eight hours of dementia training was completed within 90 days of the employee's start date for 1 of 10 sampled employees (Employee #3). severity 2 (potential for harm), scope 1 (isolated); correction date May 29, 2025
    • Patient's Rights - Patient to be informed (NRS 449A.118): Based on record review, document review and interview, the facility failed to notify residents upon admission of resident's rights as listed in NRS 449A.100 and 449A.106 to 449A.115, inclusive. severity 2 (potential for harm), scope 3 (widespread); correction date May 29, 2025
    • Discrimination prohibited (NRS 449.101): Based on observation, document review, and interview, the facility failed to: (1) ensure the prominent posting of a non-discrimination statement in the size mandated in regulation R16-20 Section 10; and (2) ensure a non-discrimination statement with contact information for filing a complaint was included in marketing material including the Internet website. severity 1 (no harm likely), scope 3 (widespread); correction date April 29, 2025
    • and 2 more in the report
  • December 27, 2024, complaint investigation, annual licensure survey: 2 deficiencies
    • Medication Administration - Plan (NAC 449.2742): Based on interview, clinical record review, and document review, the facility's administrator failed to ensure staff followed facility policy for refilling medications when two scheduled physician ordered medications were not refilled timely to avoid missed dosages for 1 of 7 sampled residents (Resident #1). severity 2 (potential for harm), scope 1 (isolated); correction date December 28, 2024
    • Medication/OTCS, Supplements, Change Order (NAC 449.2742): Based on interview, clinical record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure two scheduled medications were administered per physician orders for 1 of 7 sampled residents (Resident #1). severity 2 (potential for harm), scope 1 (isolated); correction date December 28, 2024

Complaints with substantiated allegations

  • December 27, 2024: 1 complaint substantiated (some allegations)
  • July 3, 2024: 2 complaints substantiated

Read every report on the state’s site → Search license 8994-AGC-8, then choose View Detail and SOD/POC for each inspection.

What these terms mean

Nevada grades each residential facility for groups after a survey: the Bureau adds the severity and scope scores of all deficiencies found. 0 to 15 points is an A; 16 to 24 a B; 25 to 34 a C; 35 or more a D. A single very serious deficiency can also set a lower grade (NAC 449.27702). The facility must post its grade where the public can see it.

Severity levels (NAC 449.99861): level 1 concerns administrative requirements and no harm is likely; level 2 is a potential for harm not yet realized; level 3 means a negative impact has occurred or is likely; level 4 has resulted in, or is likely to result in, death or serious harm.

Scope levels (NAC 449.9986): level 1 is isolated (20 percent or less of residents sampled); level 2 is a pattern (more than 20 and up to 50 percent); level 3 is widespread (more than 50 percent).

HCQC investigates each complaint and finds each allegation substantiated (resulting in a citation) or unsubstantiated (no citation). Some reports say an allegation was substantiated with no deficient practice cited.

When deficiencies are cited, the facility must return an approved plan of correction within 10 days. The completion date is the date the facility gave for the correction.

Deficiency names and findings are quoted from the state’s Statements of Deficiencies. Fine amounts are read from the state’s scanned sanction notices. This community is licensed for 72 residents; larger communities are inspected and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Nevada Health Authority, Health Care Quality and Compliance (formerly DPBH, Bureau of Health Care Quality and Compliance), data as of October 15, 2026, showing the last five years. The state’s search shows active licenses only. Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.

License and ownershipActive license
License type
RESIDENTIAL FACILITY FOR GROUPS
License number
8994-AGC-8
License status
Active
Licensed since
2018-01-31
Licensed capacity
72
Administrator
Timothy Grafton

Source: Nevada state licensing records (agency listing), retrieved 2026-09-09. Licensing status is a matter of public record; it is not a quality rating.

Administrator name from the Nevada licensing record, as of Sep 9, 2026.

Paying with Medicaid and other programsHow Medicaid pays for care in Nevada, and other programs

How Medicaid pays for care in Nevada

  • Waiver for the Frail Elderly (FE). Yes, for some people. Nevada Medicaid's Waiver for the Frail Elderly offers Augmented Personal Care in residential facilities for groups or assisted living settings, for people 65 and older who need nursing home level care. (state page)
  • Waitlist. Nevada's December 2024 caseload report counts people waiting for the Frail Elderly waiver (1,684 that month). (source)

Ask the community whether it accepts Medicaid.

Staff pay and workplace safety1 OSHA inspection, 1 violation cited

Federal records about how the employer here treats its staff.

OSHA workplace safety inspections

OSHA inspects workplaces for staff safety, such as lifting, needles, chemicals and workplace violence. It does not inspect resident care.

  • Jan 2, 2024: programmed (planned) inspection, complete (health). Case closed May 10, 2024. 1 violation cited (1 other). Penalties: $0 proposed, $0 now. OSHA record. OSHA recorded the employer as Radiant Senior Living. Matched by street address; the name OSHA recorded differs from the community's.
    Details
    • Other than serious: Electrical equipment and installation (1910.303(g)(1)). Penalty $0 proposed, $0 now.

Source: U.S. Department of Labor OSHA enforcement data, as of Oct 15, 2026, inspections since 2016. Penalties can change while a case is open or contested.

Location and nearby careNearest hospital 0.3 mi, nursing home 1.2 mi, pharmacy 1.0 mi
Nearest hospital with an emergency room
Northern Nevada Medical Center, Sparks. 0.3 miles away, straight line. CMS overall hospital rating: 3 of 5 stars.
Nearest Medicare nursing home
Hearthstone, Sparks. 1.2 miles away, straight line.
Nearest home health agency office
Unicare Homehealth LLC, Sparks. 2.6 miles away, straight line. Agencies travel to clients, so ask which ones serve this address.
Nearest pharmacy
CVS Pharmacy. 1.0 mile away, straight line. From OpenStreetMap, which does not list every pharmacy, so one may be closer.
Area
USDA classes ZIP code 89434 as metropolitan (metropolitan core).
Dialysis within 15 miles
Davita Sparks Dialysis Center, Sparks, 0.0 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 3 of 5 stars)
292545 Liberty Dialysis - Sparks (Fmc), Sparks, 1.8 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 3 of 5 stars)
Davita Reno Dialysis Center, Reno, 4.9 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 3 of 5 stars)
Hospice
13 Medicare hospices tell CMS they serve ZIP code 89434.
Hospice Services Of Reno, office in Sparks, 2.6 miles away, straight line
Infinity Hospice Care Of Reno, LLC, office in Reno, 6.1 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 2 of 5 stars)
Circle Of Life Hospice, office in Reno, 6.4 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 4 of 5 stars)
Nearest geriatric medicine practice
Northern Nevada Medical Group LLC, Sparks. 0.3 miles away, straight line. 1 geriatric medicine doctor listed there.

Distances are straight lines from the community, not driving distance. Hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors come from CMS provider data (CMS, hospital list updated Jul 22, 2026). Star ratings are CMS’s own.

Emergency and natural hazard riskFEMA overall risk very high; outside FEMA's high-risk flood areas

Public hazard maps for this location. Ask the community about its emergency plan, its generator and where residents would go in an evacuation.

Flood zone
Outside the high and moderate risk flood areas on FEMA's flood map (Zone X, minimal flood hazard, or not studied). (FEMA flood map)
FEMA National Risk Index
Overall: very high. By hazard: inland flooding very high, wildfire relatively low, tornado very low, heat wave very low, earthquake very high. These are FEMA’s ratings for the census tract, compared with tracts nationwide. (FEMA, December 2025)

A flood zone describes the map at this point, not the building's elevation. In an emergency, follow the local emergency management agency.

Questions to ask on a tour10 questions picked for this community from its record

Picked for this community from its record. Ask them in person and write down the answers.

  1. The state recorded a finding in March 2026. What was it, and how was it fixed?
  2. What does the base rate include, and when did rates last go up?
  3. How many caregivers are on duty during the day and at night?
  4. What happens if care needs increase? When would someone need to move?
  5. What fees are charged at move-in?
  6. How do you tell families about falls, illness or changes?
  7. How long have the executive director and the head of care been here?
  8. Who gives medications, and what training do they have?
  9. For what reasons can a resident be asked to leave?
  10. Is the apartment held during a hospital stay, and at what cost?
What we checked11 public sources we searched, with dates

Every public source we searched for this community. “Nothing on record” means we found no record that matched it. A record can be missed when a name or address differs.

SourceData as ofWhat we found
Nevada Health Authority, Health Care Quality and Compliance (formerly DPBH, Bureau of Health Care Quality and Compliance) inspection recordsOct 15, 2026See above
U.S. Department of Labor wage and hour casesOct 15, 2026Nothing on record
OSHA workplace safety inspections since 2016Oct 15, 2026See above
FEMA flood mapSee above
USDA wildfire riskApr 15, 2026Not shown: FEMA rates wildfire risk here relatively low
FEMA National Risk IndexSee above
CMS hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors; OpenStreetMap pharmaciesSee above
HUD Multifamily Properties - AssistedJul 6, 2026Nothing on record
State Veterans Homes (NASVH directory)Sep 20, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Hospice - General InformationAug 19, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Home Health Care AgenciesMay 27, 2026Nothing on record
Common questionsAnswers to 4 questions families ask
What type of care does Arbors Memory Care provide?

Arbors Memory Care is licensed by the state of Nevada for assisted living in Sparks, Nevada. Its licensed capacity is 72 residents.

Does Lilisity rate Arbors Memory Care?

No. We publish state licensing details for Arbors Memory Care but no score, rating, or ranking. Only communities on the Top Communities list or with a Senior Living Alliance Excellence Award, both based on phone-verified resident and family interviews, are ranked.

How much does Arbors Memory Care cost?

Assisted Living in Nevada typically starts at $3,500 to $5,300 a month. Based on 28 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price. Arbors Memory Care does not publish its prices.

How do I contact Arbors Memory Care?

Visit Arbors Memory Care at 2121 East Prater Way, Sparks, NV 89434.

Choosing assisted livingOur care guide: what to look for, what it costs, how families pay, and more questions to ask (PDF)

Report a wrong fact

How Lilisity works. The only scores or rankings Lilisity publishes are the Top Communities list and the Excellence Awards, both built from phone-verified resident and family interviews. Communities can pay Lilisity a flat monthly fee to manage their own listing: photos, prices, contact details, and receiving the inquiries families choose to send them. The fee is the same no matter how many families contact them or move in. Senior Living Alliance, which runs Lilisity, offers the same listing to its member communities as part of their membership; members pay SLA for its resident and family interview program. No community pays Lilisity per inquiry, per referral or per move-in. Payment never changes a testimonial, a rating, or the order of search results. The "Nearby Senior Living Alliance communities" box shows member communities only. How we verify testimonials · How we are paid