Lilisity

Assisted Living

Alta Care Home

2007 Alta Drive, Las Vegas, NV 89106 · Map
Licensed for 10 residents

State license active
Is this your community? Claim this listing

Alta Care Home is a state-licensed assisted living community in Las Vegas, Nevada. It is licensed for 10 residents. Lilisity publishes no score or ranking for this community; the details below come from the state licensing record.

Assisted LivingCare offered
10 residentsLicensed capacity
State licensedResidential facility for groups, since 2024
$3,400 to $5,200/moTypical assisted living start in Clark County, from 20 communities that publish prices

Prices

This community does not publish its prices.

Area costs

Assisted Living in Clark County typically starts at $3,400 to $5,200 a month. Based on 20 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price.

Lilisity’s independent report

What the public record shows

Gathered by Lilisity from state and federal sources. Communities can’t edit this part of the page.

State inspections

15Deficiencies cited
2Substantiated complaints

Last state inspection: Jul 15, 2026. See the record

License

Active, 10 residents

RESIDENTIAL FACILITY FOR GROUPS 10911-AGC-2, licensed since Mar 12, 2024.

Nearest emergency room

0.2 miles

Valley Hospital Medical Center, rated 2 of 5 stars by CMS.

Side by side with nearby communities

The 4 nearest communities that offer assisted living, by straight-line distance. Prices are starting prices each community publishes; we never show estimates.

CommunityDistanceLicensed capacityPublished starting priceLicenseInspection citations
Alta Care Home this community10Not publishedActive15 deficiencies, 2 substantiated complaints
Royal Haven0.5 mi6Not publishedActive3 deficiencies, 0 substantiated complaints
Lumina Las Vegas0.7 mi57Not publishedActive20 deficiencies, 1 substantiated complaint
Hastings House1.0 mi10Not publishedActive6 deficiencies, 1 substantiated complaint
Desert View Group1.4 mi10Not publishedActive1 deficiency, 0 substantiated complaints
State inspection record15 deficiencies, 2 substantiated complaints
Last state inspection
July 15, 2026 Annual licensure survey
State inspections
6
Deficiencies cited
15
Most recent grade from the state
B July 15, 2026
Complaints investigated
4: 2 substantiated, 2 not substantiated
State sanctions
0
  • License active since 2024

Most recent inspections with deficiencies

  • July 15, 2026, annual licensure survey: 6 deficiencies, grade B
    • Kitchens- Equipment Works; Clean And Sanitary (NAC 449.217): Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure expired foods were discarded. severity 2 (potential for harm), scope 3 (widespread); correction date July 15, 2026
    • Supervision and Treatment of Residents (NAC 449.259): Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 8 residents had a person-centered care plan (PCP) completed annually. (Resident #1 and Resident #2) severity 2 (potential for harm), scope 2 (pattern); correction date July 16, 2026
    • Written Policy on Admissions (NAC 449.2702): Based on record review, document review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a medical exemption request was approved by the Bureau to retain 1 of 8 residents who were bedfast (Resident #1). severity 2 (potential for harm), scope 1 (isolated); correction date July 22, 2026
    • Medical Care of Resident After Illness (NAC 449.274): Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 8 residents received an annual physical examination. (Resident #1 and Resident #2) severity 2 (potential for harm), scope 2 (pattern); correction date July 16, 2026
    • Medication Administration-Accuracy & Report (NAC 449.2742): Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a medication regimen review was completed every six months for 6 of 8 residents. (Resident #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, and #6) severity 2 (potential for harm), scope 3 (widespread); correction date June 10, 2026
    • Maintenance and Contents of Separate File (NAC 449.2749): Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a tuberculosis (TB) screening was completed annually for 2 of 8 residents. (Resident #1 and Resident #2) Resident #1 (R1) R1 was admitted on 06/12/25 with diagnoses including Type 2 diabetes mellitus and hyperlipidemia. severity 2 (potential for harm), scope 1 (isolated); correction date July 15, 2026
  • October 28, 2025, complaint investigation: 3 deficiencies, grade A
    • Service of food; seating; menus; special diets; nutritional requirements; dietary consultants (NAC 449.2175): Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was not expired and was suitable for residents. severity 2 (potential for harm), scope 3 (widespread); correction date October 28, 2025
    • Exemption Requests (NAC 449.2736): Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a medical exemption request was submitted to the Bureau and/or approved by the Bureau to retain 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #1). severity 2 (potential for harm), scope 1 (isolated); correction date October 30, 2025
    • Administration of Medication Restrictions (NAC 449.2746): Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Medication Administration Record (MAR) was initialed at the time of medication administration for 6 of 6 residents. severity 2 (potential for harm), scope 3 (widespread); correction date October 28, 2025
  • July 2, 2025, complaint investigation, annual licensure survey: 2 deficiencies, grade A
    • Exemption Requests (NAC 449.2736): Based on record review, document review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a medical exemption request was submitted to the Bureau and/or approved by the Bureau to retain 2 of 7 sampled residents (Resident #4 and #7). severity 2 (potential for harm), scope 3 (widespread); correction date August 24, 2025
    • Hospice Care Responsibilities of Staff (NAC 449.275): Based on document review, record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain a hospice record for 2 of 7 residents. (Resident #2 and #3) severity 2 (potential for harm), scope 3 (widespread); correction date August 23, 2025
  • December 18, 2024, complaint investigation: 3 deficiencies, grade A
    • Storage of Food-Perishable Foods Refrigerated (NAC 449.217): Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure eggs were properly stored. severity 2 (potential for harm), scope 3 (widespread); correction date January 30, 2025
    • Supervision and Treatment of Residents (NAC 449.259): Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care plans were complete and accurate for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #5) and reviewed by caregiving staff for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #2 and Resident #5). severity 2 (potential for harm), scope 2 (pattern); correction date January 31, 2025
    • Disclosure of Information Concerning Rates (NAC 449.2704): Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a contract, which outlined services provided, rates for services and optional services, payment methods, and refund policy, was properly completed, and signed off for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #5). severity 2 (potential for harm), scope 1 (isolated); correction date January 31, 2025

Complaints with substantiated allegations

  • July 2, 2025: 1 complaint substantiated
  • December 18, 2024: 1 complaint substantiated

Read every report on the state’s site → Search license 10911-AGC-2, then choose View Detail and SOD/POC for each inspection.

What these terms mean

Nevada grades each residential facility for groups after a survey: the Bureau adds the severity and scope scores of all deficiencies found. 0 to 15 points is an A; 16 to 24 a B; 25 to 34 a C; 35 or more a D. A single very serious deficiency can also set a lower grade (NAC 449.27702). The facility must post its grade where the public can see it.

Severity levels (NAC 449.99861): level 1 concerns administrative requirements and no harm is likely; level 2 is a potential for harm not yet realized; level 3 means a negative impact has occurred or is likely; level 4 has resulted in, or is likely to result in, death or serious harm.

Scope levels (NAC 449.9986): level 1 is isolated (20 percent or less of residents sampled); level 2 is a pattern (more than 20 and up to 50 percent); level 3 is widespread (more than 50 percent).

HCQC investigates each complaint and finds each allegation substantiated (resulting in a citation) or unsubstantiated (no citation). Some reports say an allegation was substantiated with no deficient practice cited.

When deficiencies are cited, the facility must return an approved plan of correction within 10 days. The completion date is the date the facility gave for the correction.

Deficiency names and findings are quoted from the state’s Statements of Deficiencies. Fine amounts are read from the state’s scanned sanction notices. This community is licensed for 10 residents; larger communities are inspected and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Nevada Health Authority, Health Care Quality and Compliance (formerly DPBH, Bureau of Health Care Quality and Compliance), data as of October 15, 2026, showing the last five years. The state’s search shows active licenses only. Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.

License and ownershipActive license
License type
RESIDENTIAL FACILITY FOR GROUPS
License number
10911-AGC-2
License status
Active
Licensed since
2024-03-12
Licensed capacity
10
Administrator
Peterson Durias

Source: Nevada state licensing records (agency listing), retrieved 2026-09-09. Licensing status is a matter of public record; it is not a quality rating.

Administrator name from the Nevada licensing record, as of Sep 9, 2026.

Paying with Medicaid and other programsHow Medicaid pays for care in Nevada, and other programs

How Medicaid pays for care in Nevada

  • Waiver for the Frail Elderly (FE). Yes, for some people. Nevada Medicaid's Waiver for the Frail Elderly offers Augmented Personal Care in residential facilities for groups or assisted living settings, for people 65 and older who need nursing home level care. (state page)
  • Waitlist. Nevada's December 2024 caseload report counts people waiting for the Frail Elderly waiver (1,684 that month). (source)

Ask the community whether it accepts Medicaid.

Location and nearby careNearest hospital 0.2 mi, nursing home 0.5 mi, pharmacy 0.5 mi
Nearest hospital with an emergency room
Valley Hospital Medical Center, Las Vegas. 0.2 miles away, straight line. CMS overall hospital rating: 2 of 5 stars.
Nearest Medicare nursing home
Saint Joseph Transitional Rehabilitation Center, Las Vegas. 0.5 miles away, straight line.
Nearest home health agency office
Loving Soul Home Health, Inc, Las Vegas. 0.2 miles away, straight line. Agencies travel to clients, so ask which ones serve this address.
Nearest pharmacy
CVS Pharmacy. 0.5 miles away, straight line. From OpenStreetMap, which does not list every pharmacy, so one may be closer.
Area
USDA classes ZIP code 89106 as metropolitan (metropolitan core).
Dialysis within 15 miles
Davita Las Vegas Dialysis Center, Las Vegas, 1.4 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 1 of 5 stars)
Davita South Las Vegas Dialysis Center, Las Vegas, 1.8 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 2 of 5 stars)
292519 Lake Mead North (Fmc), Las Vegas, 1.9 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 1 of 5 stars)
Hospice
78 Medicare hospices tell CMS they serve ZIP code 89106.
Loving Soul Home Health Inc, office in Las Vegas, 0.2 miles away, straight line
Liberty Creek Hospice, LLC, office in Las Vegas, 1.5 miles away, straight line
Careplus Hospice LLC, office in Las Vegas, 1.5 miles away, straight line
Nearest geriatric medicine practice
Unlv Medicine, Las Vegas. 0.6 miles away, straight line. 1 geriatric medicine doctor listed there.

Distances are straight lines from the community, not driving distance. Hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors come from CMS provider data (CMS, hospital list updated Jul 22, 2026). Star ratings are CMS’s own.

Emergency and natural hazard riskFEMA overall risk relatively high; outside FEMA's high-risk flood areas

Public hazard maps for this location. Ask the community about its emergency plan, its generator and where residents would go in an evacuation.

Flood zone
Outside the high and moderate risk flood areas on FEMA's flood map (Zone X, minimal flood hazard, or not studied). (FEMA flood map)
FEMA National Risk Index
Overall: relatively high. By hazard: inland flooding relatively moderate, tornado very low, heat wave very high, earthquake relatively high. These are FEMA’s ratings for the census tract, compared with tracts nationwide. (FEMA, December 2025)

A flood zone describes the map at this point, not the building's elevation. In an emergency, follow the local emergency management agency.

Questions to ask on a tour10 questions picked for this community from its record

Picked for this community from its record. Ask them in person and write down the answers.

  1. The state recorded a finding in July 2026. What was it, and how was it fixed?
  2. The current license dates from 2024. Has the owner or operator changed recently?
  3. What does the base rate include, and when did rates last go up?
  4. How many caregivers are on duty during the day and at night?
  5. What happens if care needs increase? When would someone need to move?
  6. What fees are charged at move-in?
  7. How do you tell families about falls, illness or changes?
  8. How long have the executive director and the head of care been here?
  9. Who gives medications, and what training do they have?
  10. For what reasons can a resident be asked to leave?
What we checked11 public sources we searched, with dates

Every public source we searched for this community. “Nothing on record” means we found no record that matched it. A record can be missed when a name or address differs.

SourceData as ofWhat we found
Nevada Health Authority, Health Care Quality and Compliance (formerly DPBH, Bureau of Health Care Quality and Compliance) inspection recordsOct 15, 2026See above
U.S. Department of Labor wage and hour casesOct 15, 2026Nothing on record
OSHA workplace safety inspections since 2016Oct 15, 2026Nothing on record
FEMA flood mapSee above
USDA wildfire riskApr 15, 2026Not shown: no FEMA wildfire rating of moderate or higher here
FEMA National Risk IndexSee above
CMS hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors; OpenStreetMap pharmaciesSee above
HUD Multifamily Properties - AssistedJul 6, 2026Nothing on record
State Veterans Homes (NASVH directory)Sep 20, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Hospice - General InformationAug 19, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Home Health Care AgenciesMay 27, 2026Nothing on record
Common questionsAnswers to 4 questions families ask
What type of care does Alta Care Home provide?

Alta Care Home is licensed by the state of Nevada for assisted living in Las Vegas, Nevada. Its licensed capacity is 10 residents.

Does Lilisity rate Alta Care Home?

No. We publish state licensing details for Alta Care Home but no score, rating, or ranking. Only communities on the Top Communities list or with a Senior Living Alliance Excellence Award, both based on phone-verified resident and family interviews, are ranked.

How much does Alta Care Home cost?

Assisted Living in Clark County typically starts at $3,400 to $5,200 a month. Based on 20 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price. Alta Care Home does not publish its prices.

How do I contact Alta Care Home?

Visit Alta Care Home at 2007 Alta Drive, Las Vegas, NV 89106.

Choosing assisted livingOur care guide: what to look for, what it costs, how families pay, and more questions to ask (PDF)

Report a wrong fact

How Lilisity works. The only scores or rankings Lilisity publishes are the Top Communities list and the Excellence Awards, both built from phone-verified resident and family interviews. Communities can pay Lilisity a flat monthly fee to manage their own listing: photos, prices, contact details, and receiving the inquiries families choose to send them. The fee is the same no matter how many families contact them or move in. Senior Living Alliance, which runs Lilisity, offers the same listing to its member communities as part of their membership; members pay SLA for its resident and family interview program. No community pays Lilisity per inquiry, per referral or per move-in. Payment never changes a testimonial, a rating, or the order of search results. The "Nearby Senior Living Alliance communities" box shows member communities only. How we verify testimonials · How we are paid