Assisted Living
Senior Living Systems, 5 Thomas Rd
5 Thomas Rd, Los Lunas, NM 87031 · Map
Licensed for 15 residents
Senior Living Systems, 5 Thomas Rd is a state-licensed assisted living community in Los Lunas, New Mexico. It is licensed for 15 residents. Lilisity publishes no score or ranking for this community; the details below come from the state licensing record.
Prices
This community does not publish its prices.
Lilisity’s independent report
What the public record shows
Gathered by Lilisity from state and federal sources. Communities can’t edit this part of the page.
State inspections
Latest survey report shown: Sep 18, 2020. See the record
License
Active, 15 residents
Assisted Living Facility 5712.
Side by side with nearby communities
The 4 nearest communities that offer assisted living, by straight-line distance. Prices are starting prices each community publishes; we never show estimates.
| Community | Distance | Licensed capacity | Published starting price | License | Inspection citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Senior Living Systems, 5 Thomas Rd this community | 15 | Not published | Active | 27 deficiencies in 16 reports | |
| Senior Living Systems, 5 Thomas Rd bldg i | 0.0 mi | 15 | Not published | Active | 0 deficiencies in 5 reports |
| Senior Living Systems Assisted Living Program | 0.0 mi | 15 | Not published | Active | 8 deficiencies in 5 reports |
| Sierra Springs Assisted Living | 2.6 mi | 15 | Not published | Active | 0 deficiencies in 20 reports |
| Good Life Memory Care | 3.5 mi | 16 | Not published | Active | 0 deficiencies in 0 reports |
State inspection record27 deficiencies in 16 reports
- NM license number
- 5712
- Licensed beds (state listing)
- 15
- Latest survey report shown
- September 18, 2020
- Survey reports posted
- 16
- Deficiencies cited
- 27
- Substantiated complaints
- 3
- Unsubstantiated complaints
- 1
Survey reports
- September 18, 2020 (offsite Revisit/Follow-up survey): no deficiencies cited report (Internet Archive copy of RTHT13.pdf)
- August 7, 2020 (Offsite Surveillance survey): no deficiencies cited report (Internet Archive copy of EMGZ11.pdf)
- May 6, 2020 (offsite surveillance survey): no deficiencies cited report (Internet Archive copy of S6WK11.pdf)
- March 30, 2020 (Offsite Surveillance survey): no deficiencies cited report (Internet Archive copy of C1MS11.pdf)
- March 19, 2020 (Onsite Surveillance survey): no deficiencies cited report (Internet Archive copy of K2R411.pdf)
Show all 16
- January 9, 2020 (Revisit/Follow-up survey): 6 deficiencies cited report (Internet Archive copy of RTHT12.pdf)
- Admissions and Discharge. The rule: “The facility shall complete an admission agreement for each resident.” The state wrote that this is an uncorrected deficiency from the survey of September 6, 2019. A020, 7.8.2.20 NMAC
- Medications. The state found: “The facility failed to ensure for 3 (R #s 1-3) of 3 (R #s 1-3) residents whose Medication Administration Records (MARs) reviewed for compliance included the diagnosis and both the brand/generic names for all medications.” The state wrote that this is an uncorrected deficiency from the survey of September 6, 2019. A035, 7.8.2.35 NMAC
- Nutrition. The rule: “The facility shall provide planned and nutritionally balanced meals from the basic food groups in accordance with the “recommended daily dietary allowance” of the American dietetic association, the food and nutrition board of the national research council, or the national academy of sciences.” The state wrote that this is an uncorrected deficiency from the survey of September 6, 2019. A036, 7.8.2.36 NMAC
- Laundry Services. The state found: “The facility failed to ensure that laundry/cleaning supplies were kept in a secure room or cabinet.” 7.8.2.37 NMAC
- Maintenance of Building and Grounds. The state found: “The facility failed to ensure that the interior floors were free from tripping hazards.” The state wrote that this is an uncorrected deficiency from the survey of September 6, 2019. A042, 7.8.2.42 NMAC
- Smoking. The state found: “The facility failed to ensure that smoking was only allowed in supervised areas designated by the facility and approved by the state fire marshal or local fire prevention authorities with suitable ashtrays.” The state wrote that this is an uncorrected deficiency from the survey of September 6, 2019. A067, 7.8.2.67 NMAC
- September 6, 2019 (Complaint survey): 13 deficiencies cited, complaint 32352 substantiated report (Internet Archive copy of RTHT11.pdf)
- Staff Training. The state found: “The facility failed to ensure that the Direct Care Staff (DCS) had documentation of completing 16 hours of supervised training prior to working independently with residents.” 7.8.2.17 NMAC
- Admissions and Discharge. The rule: “The facility shall complete an admission agreement for each resident.” 7.8.2.20 NMAC
- Resident Records 7.8.2.21 NMAC
- Facility Reports, Records, Rules, Policies and Procedures. The state found: “The facility failed to ensure that they had written policies for emergency evacuation plan for community wide disasters.” 7.8.2.22 NMAC
- Handling of Emergencies. The state found: “The facility failed to ensure that a list of emergency phone numbers (fire, police, ambulance, poison control, etc) was posted by the phone used by residents, families, and visitors.” 7.8.2.31 NMAC
- Custodial Drug Permits. The rule: “A facility with two (2) or more residents that is licensed pursuant to this rule and that assists with self-administration or safeguards medications for residents shall have a current custodial drug permit issued by the state board of pharmacy.” 7.8.2.34 NMAC
- Medications. The state found: “The facility failed to ensure that 4 residents (R #s 1-4) whose Medication Administration Records (MARs) were reviewed for compliance included both the brand/generic names of the medications.” 7.8.2.35 NMAC
- Nutrition. The rule: “The facility shall provide planned and nutritionally balanced meals from the basic food groups in accordance with the “recommended daily dietary allowance” of the American dietetic association, the food and nutrition board of the national research council, or the national academy of sciences.” 7.8.2.36 NMAC
- Housekeeping Services. The rule: “The facility shall maintain the interior and exterior of the facility in a safe, clean, orderly and attractive manner.” 7.8.2.38 NMAC
- Maintenance of Building and Grounds. The rule: “The building(s) shall be maintained in good repair at all times.” 7.8.2.42 NMAC
- Hazardous Areas. The state found: “The facility failed to ensure that the walls of the Mechanical room had no perforations or combustible items including flammable chemicals stored in the hazardous areas with a fuel fired boiler and water heater .” 7.8.2.43 NMAC
- Toilet and Bathing Facilities. The state found: “The facility failed to ensure that the Community restroom located near the TV room contained a well maintained, clean and sanitary shower.” 7.8.2.55 NMAC
- Smoking 7.8.2.67 NMAC
- June 28, 2019 (life safety code survey): see the report report (Internet Archive copy of NKOI22.pdf)
- January 12, 2018 (life safety code survey): 6 deficiencies cited report (Internet Archive copy of NKOI21.pdf)
- Lighting and Lighting Fixtures. The state found: “The facility failed to ensure emergency lights are being tested annually for a duration of 90 minutes.” 7.8.2.47 NMAC
- Doors. The state found: “The facility failed to ensure front exit doors swing outward.” 7.8.2.49 NMAC
- Fire Alarms, Smoke Detectors and Other Equipment 7.8.2.61 NMAC
- Automatic Fire Protection (Sprinkler) System. The state found: “The facility failed to ensure a sprinkler system was installed.” 7.8.2.62 NMAC
- Fire Extinguishers. The rule: “Fire extinguisher(s) must be located in the facility, as approved by the state fire marshal or the fire prevention authority with jurisdiction.” 7.8.2.63 NMAC
- Fire Drills. The state found: “The facility failed to ensure fire drills were conducted at least quarterly on each shift to ensure preparedness for emergency response.” 7.8.2.65 NMAC
- April 4, 2014 (complaint investigation): 1 deficiency cited, complaint 29374 substantiated report (Internet Archive copy of WKG911.pdf)
- Resident Rights. The state found: “The facility failed to ensure a safe and sanitary living environment for all of its fifteen residents.” 7.8.2.33 NMAC
- April 4, 2014 (complaint investigation): 1 deficiency cited, complaint 29374 investigated (outcome in the report) report (Internet Archive copy of S_WKG911.pdf)
- Resident Rights. The state found: “The facility failed to ensure a safe and sanitary living environment for all of its fifteen residents.” 7.8.2.33 NMAC
- October 22, 2013 (complaint investigation): no deficiencies cited, complaint 28881 unsubstantiated report (Internet Archive copy of S_RMRH11.pdf)
- October 22, 2013 (complaint investigation): no deficiencies cited, complaint 28881 unsubstantiated report (Internet Archive copy of RMRH11.pdf)
- March 19, 2012 (complaint investigation): no deficiencies cited, complaint 28294 substantiated report (Internet Archive copy of S_SUZC11.pdf)
- March 19, 2012 (complaint investigation): no deficiencies cited, complaint 28294 substantiated report (Internet Archive copy of SUZC11.pdf)
- May 18, 2009: see the report report (Internet Archive copy of S_33GX11.pdf)
The state’s listing for license 5712 (Internet Archive copy) →
New Mexico’s License Oversight Bureau posts each survey’s Statement of Deficiencies as a scanned PDF. We read the scans by OCR and show, for each report, the survey date, the kind of survey in the state’s words, each deficiency tag with the rule it cites and the state’s own one-sentence finding when OCR reads it whole. Each rule is named by its heading in New Mexico’s assisted living rules: 7.8.2 NMAC until June 30, 2024, and 8.370.14 NMAC (same section numbers) since July 1, 2024. The rules say: “If violations of this rule are cited, the facility will be provided with an official statement of deficiencies within 10 business days following the survey.” The facility’s plan of correction is printed in the right-hand column of the same report. The reports give no severity level for assisted living deficiencies, and the state’s site lists no fines or license actions. Revisit reports often repeat the complaint outcomes of the survey they follow up on; we count each complaint once. The state’s site (alf.hca.nm.gov) has not answered since at least September 2026, so we read the listing and reports from the Internet Archive’s copies, captured between January 16, 2026 and June 12, 2026. Reports the state posted after that are not shown. This community is licensed for 15 residents; larger communities are inspected and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: New Mexico Health Care Authority, Division of Health Improvement, License Oversight Bureau, read October 16, 2026. The report itself is the official record. Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.
License and ownershipActive license
- License type
- Assisted Living Facility
- License number
- 5712
- License status
- Active
- Licensed capacity
- 15
- County
- Valencia County
State listing as of June 2026. New Mexico HCA assisted living directory, archived copy.
Source: New Mexico state licensing records (agency listing), retrieved 2026-06-12. Licensing status is a matter of public record; it is not a quality rating.
Paying with Medicaid and other programsHow Medicaid pays for care in New Mexico, and other programs
How Medicaid pays for care in New Mexico
- Turquoise Care Community Benefit (Agency-Based Community Benefit). Yes. New Mexico Medicaid's Community Benefit, provided through Turquoise Care managed care plans, lists assisted living as a covered service. (state page)
Ask the community whether it accepts Medicaid.
Questions to ask on a tour9 questions picked for this community from its record
Picked for this community from its record. Ask them in person and write down the answers.
- What does the base rate include, and when did rates last go up?
- How many caregivers are on duty during the day and at night?
- What happens if care needs increase? When would someone need to move?
- What fees are charged at move-in?
- How do you tell families about falls, illness or changes?
- How long have the executive director and the head of care been here?
- Who gives medications, and what training do they have?
- For what reasons can a resident be asked to leave?
- Is the apartment held during a hospital stay, and at what cost?
What we checked7 public sources we searched, with dates
Every public source we searched for this community. “Nothing on record” means we found no record that matched it. A record can be missed when a name or address differs.
| Source | Data as of | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| New Mexico Health Care Authority, Division of Health Improvement, License Oversight Bureau inspection records | Oct 16, 2026 | See above |
| U.S. Department of Labor wage and hour cases | Oct 15, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| OSHA workplace safety inspections since 2016 | Oct 15, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| HUD Multifamily Properties - Assisted | Jul 6, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| State Veterans Homes (NASVH directory) | Sep 20, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| CMS Hospice - General Information | Aug 19, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| CMS Home Health Care Agencies | May 27, 2026 | Nothing on record |
Common questionsAnswers to 4 questions families ask
What type of care does Senior Living Systems, 5 Thomas Rd provide?
Senior Living Systems, 5 Thomas Rd is licensed by the state of New Mexico for assisted living in Los Lunas, New Mexico. Its licensed capacity is 15 residents.
Does Lilisity rate Senior Living Systems, 5 Thomas Rd?
No. We publish state licensing details for Senior Living Systems, 5 Thomas Rd but no score, rating, or ranking. Only communities on the Top Communities list or with a Senior Living Alliance Excellence Award, both based on phone-verified resident and family interviews, are ranked.
How much does Senior Living Systems, 5 Thomas Rd cost?
Senior Living Systems, 5 Thomas Rd does not publish its prices.
How do I contact Senior Living Systems, 5 Thomas Rd?
Use Senior Living Systems, 5 Thomas Rd's website, seniorlivingsystems.org, or visit at 5 Thomas Rd, Los Lunas, NM 87031.
How Lilisity works. The only scores or rankings Lilisity publishes are the Top Communities list and the Excellence Awards, both built from phone-verified resident and family interviews. Communities can pay Lilisity a flat monthly fee to manage their own listing: photos, prices, contact details, and receiving the inquiries families choose to send them. The fee is the same no matter how many families contact them or move in. Senior Living Alliance, which runs Lilisity, offers the same listing to its member communities as part of their membership; members pay SLA for its resident and family interview program. No community pays Lilisity per inquiry, per referral or per move-in. Payment never changes a testimonial, a rating, or the order of search results. The "Nearby Senior Living Alliance communities" box shows member communities only. How we verify testimonials · How we are paid