Assisted Living
Millie’s Assisted Living Community
600 N Hudson St, Silver City, NM 88061 · Map
Licensed for 16 residents
Millie’s Assisted Living Community is a state-licensed assisted living community in Silver City, New Mexico. It is licensed for 16 residents. Lilisity publishes no score or ranking for this community; the details below come from the state licensing record.
Prices
This community does not publish its prices.
Lilisity’s independent report
What the public record shows
Gathered by Lilisity from state and federal sources. Communities can’t edit this part of the page.
State inspections
Latest survey report shown: Aug 11, 2020. See the record
License
Active, 16 residents
Assisted Living Facility 2049.
Side by side with nearby communities
The 3 nearest communities that offer assisted living, by straight-line distance. Prices are starting prices each community publishes; we never show estimates.
| Community | Distance | Licensed capacity | Published starting price | License | Inspection citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Millie’s Assisted Living Community this community | 16 | Not published | Active | 36 deficiencies in 14 reports | |
| Sunset Vista | 2.0 mi | 30 | Not published | Active | 19 deficiencies in 12 reports |
| Willow Manor | 46.3 mi | 57 | Not published | Active | 0 deficiencies in 0 reports |
| Beehive Homes of Deming | 47.4 mi | 14 | Not published | Active | 1 deficiency in 8 reports |
State inspection record36 deficiencies in 14 reports
- NM license number
- 2049
- Licensed beds (state listing)
- 16
- Latest survey report shown
- August 11, 2020
- Survey reports posted
- 14
- Deficiencies cited
- 36
- Substantiated complaints
- 0
- Unsubstantiated complaints
- 3
Survey reports
- August 11, 2020 (Offsite Surveillance survey): no deficiencies cited report (Internet Archive copy of F84C11.pdf)
- June 22, 2020 (Offsite Surveillance survey): no deficiencies cited report (Internet Archive copy of RIH411.pdf)
- April 23, 2020: no deficiencies cited report (Internet Archive copy of SYQ611.pdf)
- April 1, 2020 (Offsite Surveillance survey): no deficiencies cited report (Internet Archive copy of NUPS11.pdf)
- March 17, 2020 (Onsite Surveillance survey): no deficiencies cited report (Internet Archive copy of WNWE11.pdf)
Show all 14
- February 7, 2020 (Revisit/Follow-up survey): no deficiencies cited report (Internet Archive copy of LRVS12.pdf)
- September 27, 2019: 6 deficiencies cited, complaint 38516 unsubstantiated report (Internet Archive copy of LRVS11.pdf)
- Admissions and Discharge. The rule: “The facility shall complete an admission agreement for each resident.” 7.8.2.20 NMAC
- Custodial Drug Permits. The state found: “The facility failed to have the medication regimen reviewed at least quarterly/every 3 months by the consulting pharmacist.” 7.8.2.34 NMAC
- Medications. The rule: “Administration of medications or staff assistance with self-administration of medications shall be in accordance with state and federal laws.” 7.8.2.35 NMAC
- Nutrition. The state found: “The facility failed to ensure that food in the refrigerator was labeled and dated.” 7.8.2.36 NMAC
- Hazardous Areas. The state found: “The facility failed to keep the fuel fired furnace room free of combustible storage.” 7.8.2.43 NMAC
- Automatic Fire Protection (Sprinkler) System. The state found: “The facility failed to ensure the automatic fire sprinkler system had the sprinkler heads maintained in the facility.” 7.8.2.62 NMAC
- July 27, 2016 (On-site/Monitoring survey): 14 deficiencies cited, complaint 29979 investigated (outcome in the report), complaint 30053 investigated (outcome in the report) report (Internet Archive copy of 6DDQ11.pdf)
- General Licensing Requirements. The state found: “The facility failed to apply for annual license renewal, thirty (30) days prior to the current license's expiration date.” 7.8.2.8 NMAC
- Staff Qualifications. The rule: “A facility shall employ staff with the following qualifications.” 7.8.2.16 NMAC
- Staff Training 7.8.2.17 NMAC
- Resident Records. The state found: “The facility failed to protect the health and safety of 1 (R #3) of 3 (R #s 1 - 3) residents by not ensuring resident charts reviewed had a physical examination report from a primary care physician, a nurse practitioner or a physician's assistant.” 7.8.2.21 NMAC
- Resident Evaluation. The state found: “The facility failed to ensure that 1 (R # 3) of 3 (R#s 1, 2 & 3) residents whose evaluations were reviewed for timeliness and accuracy had been reviewed every 6 months and had special medical services documented that are provided by an outside agency.” 7.8.2.25 NMAC
- Individual Service Plan (ISP). The state found: “The facility failed to ensure that the resident Individual Service Plan (ISP) for 1 (R #3) of 3 (R#s 1-3) residents records reviewed for timeliness, accuracy, and detail met the requirements.” 7.8.2.26 NMAC
- Custodial Drug Permits. The rule: “A facility with two (2) or more residents that is licensed pursuant to this rule and that assists with self-administration or safeguards medications for residents shall have a current custodial drug permit issued by the state board of pharmacy.” 7.8.2.34 NMAC
- Hazardous Areas. The state found: “The facility failed to ensure that penetrations and holes in hazardous areas (water heater rooms, furnace rooms, and laundry) in the fire rated walls and ceilings were properly sealed with approved fire suppression material and failed to have automatic door closures and latches in working order.” 7.8.2.43 NMAC
- Heating, Air-Conditioning and Ventilation. The state found: “The facility failed to screen double doors (French doors) that were being used for ventilation.” 7.8.2.44 NMAC
- Electrical System. The state found: “The facility failed to ensure a multi-socket electrical adaptor was a surge protector and approved by United Laboratories (U/L).” 7.8.2.48 NMAC
- Fire Extinguishers. The state found: “The facility failed to annually maintain all portable fire extinguishers in accordance with NFPA 10 Standard for Portable Fire Extinguishers.” 7.8.2.63 NMAC
- Fire Drills. The rule: “All facilities shall conduct monthly fire drills which are to be documented.” 7.8.2.65 NMAC
- Hospice. The rule: “An assisted living facility that provides or coordinates hospice care and services shall meet the requirements in this section, in addition to the rules applicable to all assisted living facilities, 7.8.2 NMAC.” 7.8.2.68 NMAC
- Incorporated and Related Rules and Codes. The rule: “The facilities that are subject to this rule are also subject to other rules, codes and standards that may, from time to time, be amended.” 7.8.2.70 NMAC
- September 13, 2012 (complaint investigation): no deficiencies cited, complaint 28679 unsubstantiated report (Internet Archive copy of 9JEE11.pdf)
- September 8, 2011 (complaint investigation): 8 deficiencies cited, complaint 27856 unsubstantiated report (Internet Archive copy of U7PW11.pdf)
- Admissions and Discharge. The state found: “The facility failed to have evidence of a team meeting to jointly decide the appropriateness of admission/retention of 2 of 2 (#1 ) residents requiring a greater degree of care than the facility would normally provide or is permitted to provide and were receiving services from an outside agency.” The state wrote that this is an repeat deficiency from the survey of April 15, 2009. 7.8.2.20 NMAC
- Resident Records. The state found: “The facility failed to have an admissions physical examination report on file for 1 of 2 resident charts reviewed (#1).” 7.8.2.21 NMAC
- Pets. The state found: “The facility failed to ensure pets were not allowed in the food preparation and serving areas.” 7.8.2.23 NMAC
- Resident Evaluation. The state found: “The facility failed to have the resident evaluations reviewed and updated every 6 months for 2 of 2 (#1 & #2) resident's charts reviewed.” The state wrote that this is an repeat deficiency from the survey of April 15, 2009. 7.8.2.25 NMAC
- Individual Service Plan (ISP). The state found: “The facility failed to have the Individual Service Plan (ISP) detail the services being provided by outside agencies for 2 of 2 resident charts reviewed (#1 & #2).” The state wrote that this is an repeat deficiency from the survey of April 15, 2009. 7.8.2.26 NMAC
- Exits. The state found: “The facility failed to keep an approved exit to the building free from obstructions.” 7.8.2.50 NMAC
- Hospice. The state found: “The facility failed to have palliative/hospice care training for all 8 staff.” 7.8.2.68 NMAC
- Incorporated and Related Rules and Codes. The state found: “The facility failed to submit all fees and pertinent application information to the Caregiver Criminal History Screening (CCHS) program for 1 of 2 (#21) staff within twenty (20) calendar days from the first day of employment.” The state wrote that this is an repeat deficiency from the survey of April 15, 2009. 7.8.2.70 NMAC
- September 8, 2011 (complaint investigation): 7 deficiencies cited, complaint 27856 unsubstantiated report (Internet Archive copy of S_U7PW11.pdf)
- Admissions and Discharge. The state found: “The facility failed to have evidence of a team meeting to admission/retention of 2 of 2 (#1 ) residents requiring a greater degree of care than the facility would normally provide or is permitted to provide and were receiving services from an outside agency.” The state wrote that this is an repeat deficiency from the survey of April 15, 2009. A020, 7.8.2.20 NMAC
- Resident Records. The state found: “The facility failed to have an admissions physical examination report on file for t of 2 resident charts reviewed (#1).” A021, 7.8.2.21 NMAC
- Pets. The state found: “The facility failed to ensure pets were not allowed in the food preparation and serving areas.” The state wrote that this is an repeat deficiency from the survey of April 15, 2009. A023, 7.8.2.23 NMAC
- Individual Service Plan (ISP). The rule: “An ISP shall be developed and implemented within ten (10) calendar days of admission for each resident residing in the facility.” The state wrote that this is an repeat deficiency from the survey of April 15, 2009. A026, 7.8.2.26 NMAC
- Exits A050, 7.8.2.50 NMAC
- Hospice. The state found: “The facility failed to have palliative/hospice care training for all 8 staff.” A068, 7.8.2.68 NMAC
- Incorporated and Related Rules and Codes. The state found: “The facility failed to submit all fees and pertinent application information to the Caregiver Criminal History Screening (CCHS) program for 1 of 2 (#21) staff within twenty (20) calendar days from the first day of employment.” The state wrote that this is an repeat deficiency from the survey of April 15, 2009. A070, 7.8.2.70 NMAC
- April 15, 2009: see the report report (Internet Archive copy of S_4S8611.pdf)
- December 28, 2007 (time of survey): see the report report (Internet Archive copy of S_6YI421.pdf)
- January 11, 2007: 1 deficiency cited report (Internet Archive copy of S_NG6511.pdf)
- Grounds for Revocation, Suspension or Denial of Initial or Renewal of License, or the Imposition of Sanctions or Civil Monetary Penalties. The state found: “THE FACILITY FAILED TO CONVENE A TEAM TO DETERMINE ADMISSION/RETENSION EXCEPTION FOR 2 OF 2 RESIDENTS RECEIVING HOSPICE SERVICES AND FOR 1 RESIDENT RECEIVING NURSING SERVICES FROM A HOME HEALTH AGENCY.” 7.8.2.13 NMAC
The state’s listing for license 2049 (Internet Archive copy) →
New Mexico’s License Oversight Bureau posts each survey’s Statement of Deficiencies as a scanned PDF. We read the scans by OCR and show, for each report, the survey date, the kind of survey in the state’s words, each deficiency tag with the rule it cites and the state’s own one-sentence finding when OCR reads it whole. Each rule is named by its heading in New Mexico’s assisted living rules: 7.8.2 NMAC until June 30, 2024, and 8.370.14 NMAC (same section numbers) since July 1, 2024. The rules say: “If violations of this rule are cited, the facility will be provided with an official statement of deficiencies within 10 business days following the survey.” The facility’s plan of correction is printed in the right-hand column of the same report. The reports give no severity level for assisted living deficiencies, and the state’s site lists no fines or license actions. Revisit reports often repeat the complaint outcomes of the survey they follow up on; we count each complaint once. The state’s site (alf.hca.nm.gov) has not answered since at least September 2026, so we read the listing and reports from the Internet Archive’s copies, captured between January 16, 2026 and June 12, 2026. Reports the state posted after that are not shown. This community is licensed for 16 residents; larger communities are inspected and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: New Mexico Health Care Authority, Division of Health Improvement, License Oversight Bureau, read October 16, 2026. The report itself is the official record. Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.
License and ownershipActive license
- License type
- Assisted Living Facility
- License number
- 2049
- License status
- Active
- Licensed capacity
- 16
- County
- Grant County
State listing as of April 2026. New Mexico HCA assisted living directory, archived copy.
Source: New Mexico state licensing records (agency listing), retrieved 2026-04-21. Licensing status is a matter of public record; it is not a quality rating.
Paying with Medicaid and other programsHow Medicaid pays for care in New Mexico, and other programs
How Medicaid pays for care in New Mexico
- Turquoise Care Community Benefit (Agency-Based Community Benefit). Yes. New Mexico Medicaid's Community Benefit, provided through Turquoise Care managed care plans, lists assisted living as a covered service. (state page)
Ask the community whether it accepts Medicaid.
Questions to ask on a tour9 questions picked for this community from its record
Picked for this community from its record. Ask them in person and write down the answers.
- What does the base rate include, and when did rates last go up?
- How many caregivers are on duty during the day and at night?
- What happens if care needs increase? When would someone need to move?
- What fees are charged at move-in?
- How do you tell families about falls, illness or changes?
- How long have the executive director and the head of care been here?
- Who gives medications, and what training do they have?
- For what reasons can a resident be asked to leave?
- Is the apartment held during a hospital stay, and at what cost?
What we checked7 public sources we searched, with dates
Every public source we searched for this community. “Nothing on record” means we found no record that matched it. A record can be missed when a name or address differs.
| Source | Data as of | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| New Mexico Health Care Authority, Division of Health Improvement, License Oversight Bureau inspection records | Oct 16, 2026 | See above |
| U.S. Department of Labor wage and hour cases | Oct 15, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| OSHA workplace safety inspections since 2016 | Oct 15, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| HUD Multifamily Properties - Assisted | Jul 6, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| State Veterans Homes (NASVH directory) | Sep 20, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| CMS Hospice - General Information | Aug 19, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| CMS Home Health Care Agencies | May 27, 2026 | Nothing on record |
Common questionsAnswers to 4 questions families ask
What type of care does Millie’s Assisted Living Community provide?
Millie’s Assisted Living Community is licensed by the state of New Mexico for assisted living in Silver City, New Mexico. Its licensed capacity is 16 residents.
Does Lilisity rate Millie’s Assisted Living Community?
No. We publish state licensing details for Millie’s Assisted Living Community but no score, rating, or ranking. Only communities on the Top Communities list or with a Senior Living Alliance Excellence Award, both based on phone-verified resident and family interviews, are ranked.
How much does Millie’s Assisted Living Community cost?
Millie’s Assisted Living Community does not publish its prices.
How do I contact Millie’s Assisted Living Community?
Use Millie’s Assisted Living Community's website, milliesassistedliving.com, or visit at 600 N Hudson St, Silver City, NM 88061.
How Lilisity works. The only scores or rankings Lilisity publishes are the Top Communities list and the Excellence Awards, both built from phone-verified resident and family interviews. Communities can pay Lilisity a flat monthly fee to manage their own listing: photos, prices, contact details, and receiving the inquiries families choose to send them. The fee is the same no matter how many families contact them or move in. Senior Living Alliance, which runs Lilisity, offers the same listing to its member communities as part of their membership; members pay SLA for its resident and family interview program. No community pays Lilisity per inquiry, per referral or per move-in. Payment never changes a testimonial, a rating, or the order of search results. The "Nearby Senior Living Alliance communities" box shows member communities only. How we verify testimonials · How we are paid