Lilisity

Assisted Living

Windsong at Woodsedge

1010 Anne Street Nw, Bemidji, MN 56601 · Map
Licensed for 100 residents · WINDSONG AT WOODSEDGE

State license active
Is this your community? Claim this listing

Windsong at Woodsedge is a state-licensed assisted living community in Bemidji, Minnesota. It is licensed for 100 residents. Lilisity publishes no score or ranking for this community; the details below come from the state licensing record.

Assisted LivingCare offered
100 residentsLicensed capacity
State licensedAssisted living facility
From $2,754/moStarting price

Prices

Starting prices the community publishes, with the date we checked each one and a link to where it is published. Care charges are usually added after an assessment.

CareStarting atChecked
Assisted Living$2,754 /moOct 12, 2026

Area costs

Assisted Living in Minnesota typically starts at $2,200 to $4,800 a month. Based on 74 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price.

Care and services

From the community’s website

What Windsong at Woodsedge says about itself, quoted from its own site. We have not checked these claims against licensing records. Ask about each one on a tour.

  • Offers respite or short-term stays. Respite care (page, checked Oct 12, 2026)
  • Provides transportation. Transportation (page, checked Oct 12, 2026)
  • 3 meals a day. Three chef-prepared meals daily (page, checked Oct 12, 2026)

Lilisity’s independent report

What the public record shows

Gathered by Lilisity from state and federal sources. Communities can’t edit this part of the page.

State inspections

0Substantiated investigations

Last evaluation: Jan 12, 2025. See the record

License

Active, 100 residents

Assisted Living Facility 424806, current license dated Apr 1, 2026. Licensee WINDSONG AT WOODSEDGE.

Nearest emergency room

0.3 miles

Sanford Bemidji Medical Center, rated 4 of 5 stars by CMS.

Side by side with nearby communities

The 4 nearest communities that offer assisted living, by straight-line distance. Prices are starting prices each community publishes; we never show estimates.

CommunityDistanceLicensed capacityPublished starting priceLicenseInspection citations
Windsong at Woodsedge this community100$2,754/moActive0 substantiated
Sanford Health Trillium0.1 mi30$4,829/moActive1 substantiated
Goldpine Home0.7 mi97Not publishedActive0 substantiated
Autumn Hills Assisted Living0.9 mi31Not publishedActive1 substantiated
Colleens Caring Hands1.1 mi10Not publishedActive0 substantiated
State inspection record0 substantiated
Last evaluation
January 12, 2025
Evaluations on record
2
Investigations substantiated
0 kept 7 years
Inconclusive
0 kept 4 years
Unsubstantiated
0 kept 3 years

Most recent evaluation (January 12, 2025, state report DSTJ11)

MDH: “On December 10, 2024, through December 12, 2024, the Minnesota Department of Health conducted a full survey at the above provider.”

Survey completed December 12, 2024: 11 correction orders

  • Tag 630: 144G.42 Subd. 6 (b) Compliance with requirements for reporting ma Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure an individual abuse prevention plan (IAPP) was accurate for one of one resident (R5) whom had unsecured oxygen tanks in his sleeping unit.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure an individual abuse prevention plan (IAPP) was accurate for one of one resident (R5) whom had unsecured oxygen tanks in his sleeping unit. This had the potential to affect all residents. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(b) The facility must develop and implement an individual abuse prevention plan for each vulnerable adult. [...]”

  • Tag 650: 144G.42 Subd. 8 (a) Staff records Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the employee record contained the required content for one of three employees (registered nurse (RN)-C).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the employee record contained the required content for one of three employees (registered nurse (RN)-C). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) The facility must maintain current records of each paid staff member, each regularly scheduled volunteer providing services, and each individual contractor providing services. [...]”

  • Tag 660: 144G.42 Subd. 9 Tuberculosis prevention and control Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to maintain a tuberculosis (TB) prevention and control program based on the most current guidelines issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to maintain a tuberculosis (TB) prevention and control program based on the most current guidelines issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The licensee failed to complete a TB risk assessment annually. This had the potential to affect all residents. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) The facility must establish and maintain a comprehensive tuberculosis infection control program according to the most current tuberculosis infection control guidelines issued by the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Division [...]”

  • Tag 680: 144G.42 Subd. 10 Disaster planning and emergency preparedness Level 1, widespread scope, scope/level letter C · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the Emergency Preparedness Plan (EPP) was prominently posted.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the Emergency Preparedness Plan (EPP) was prominently posted. This had the potential to affect all residents, staff, and any visitors of the facility. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) The facility must meet the following requirements: (1) have a written emergency disaster plan that contains a plan for evacuation, addresses elements of sheltering in place, identifies temporary relocation sites, and details staff assignments in the event [...]”

  • Tag 730: 144G.43 Subd. 3 Contents of resident record Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the resident record included a discharge summary with the required content for one of one resident (R4) discharged from the facility.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the resident record included a discharge summary with the required content for one of one resident (R4) discharged from the facility. [...]”

    Rule cited: “Contents of a resident record include the following for each resident: (1) identifying information, including the resident's name, date of birth, address, and telephone number; (2) the name, address, and telephone number of the resident's emergency contact, [...]”

Show all 11
  • Tag 780: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (1) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to comply with the requirements of the Minnesota State Fire Code.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to comply with the requirements of the Minnesota State Fire Code. This had the potential to directly affect all residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”

    Rule cited: “for dwellings or sleeping units, as defined in the State Fire Code: (i) provide smoke alarms in each room used for sleeping purposes; (ii) provide smoke alarms outside each separate sleeping area in the immediate vicinity of bedrooms; (iii) provide smoke [...]”

  • Tag 810: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (b-f) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop the fire safety and evacuation plan with required content, make the plan readily available, provide required training and drills.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to develop the fire safety and evacuation plan with required content, make the plan readily available, provide required training and drills. This had the potential to directly affect all residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(b) Each assisted living facility shall develop and maintain fire safety and evacuation plans. [...]”

  • Tag 1290: 144G.60 Subdivision 1 Background studies required Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Two (2) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure a background study was affiliated with the assisted living license for three of three employees (clinical nurse supervisor (CNS)-B, maintenance manager (MM)-D, and lead maintenance (LM)-E).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure a background study was affiliated with the assisted living license for three of three employees (clinical nurse supervisor (CNS)-B, maintenance manager (MM)-D, and lead maintenance (LM)-E). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) Employees, contractors, and regularly scheduled volunteers of the facility are subject to the background study required by section 144.057 and may be disqualified under chapter 245C. [...]”

  • Tag 1620: 144G.70 Subd. 2 (c-e) Initial reviews, assessments, and monitoring Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) completed a reassessment not to exceed 90 days for one of three residents (R1).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) completed a reassessment not to exceed 90 days for one of three residents (R1). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(c) Resident reassessment and monitoring must be conducted no more than 14 calendar days after initiation of services. [...]”

  • Tag 1700: 144G.71 Subd. 2 Provision of medication management services Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure a resident was assessed for self-administration of medications for one of one resident (R1) who self-administers creams.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure a resident was assessed for self-administration of medications for one of one resident (R1) who self-administers creams. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) For each resident who requests medication management services, the facility shall, prior to providing medication management services, have a registered nurse, licensed health professional, or authorized prescriber under section 151.37 conduct an [...]”

  • Tag 2310: 144G.91 Subd. 4 (a) Appropriate care and services Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the care and services were provided according to acceptable health care and medical, or nursing standards with regards to safely storing oxygen for one of one resident (R2).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the care and services were provided according to acceptable health care and medical, or nursing standards with regards to safely storing oxygen for one of one resident (R2). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) Residents have the right to care and assisted living services that are appropriate based on the resident's needs and according to an up-to-date service plan subject to accepted health care standards.”

From MDH’s letter: the letter says the facility is in substantial compliance; no immediate fines.

Earlier evaluations (1)
  • January 6, 2022: report MGRI11 · 22 correction orders
    Details

    Survey completed January 6, 2022: 22 correction orders

    • Tag 470: 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Minimum requirements Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop and implement a staffing plan to determine staffing levels to meet the needs of all residents.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to develop and implement a staffing plan to determine staffing levels to meet the needs of all residents. This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death), and is issued at a widespread scope (when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic [...]”

      Rule cited: “(11) develop and implement a staffing plan for determining its staffing level that: (i) includes an evaluation, to be conducted at least twice a year, of the appropriateness of staffing levels in the facility; (ii) ensures sufficient staffing at all times to [...]”

    • Tag 480: 144G.41 Subd 1 (13) (i) (B) Minimum requirements Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code. This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety) and was issued at a widespread scope (when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has affected or has the potential to affect a large portion or all the [...]”

      Rule cited: “(13) offer to provide or make available at least the following services to residents: (i) at least three nutritious meals daily with snacks available seven days per week, according to the recommended dietary allowances in the United States Department of [...]”

    • Tag 730: 144G.43 Subd. 3 Contents of resident record Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure documentation of all services received for one of four residents (R5), with records reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure documentation of all services received for one of four residents (R5), with records reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “Contents of a resident record include the following for each resident: (1) identifying information, including the resident's name, date of birth, address, and telephone number; (2) the name, address, and telephone number of the resident's emergency contact, [...]”

    • Tag 810: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (b)-(f) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide the required training, drills, and plans for fire safety and evacuation.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on document review and interview, the licensee failed to provide the required training, drills, and plans for fire safety and evacuation. This had the potential to affect all residents and staff. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(b) Each assisted living facility shall develop and maintain fire safety and evacuation plans. [...]”

    • Tag 950: 144.50 Subd. 3 Designation of representative Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure four of four residents' (R1, R3, R4, and R5) assisted living contract included a notice with the required verbiage for the residents to identify a designated representative.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure four of four residents' (R1, R3, R4, and R5) assisted living contract included a notice with the required verbiage for the residents to identify a designated representative. This had the potential to affect all 21 residents who received services at the facility. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) Before or at the time of execution of an assisted living contract, an assisted living facility must offer the resident the opportunity to identify a designated representative in writing in the contract and must provide the following verbatim notice on a [...]”

    Show all 22
    • Tag 1470: 144G.63 Subd. 2 Content of required orientation Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure orientation to assisted living facility statutes included all the required content for two of two employees, (RN-C and ULP-D) with records reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure orientation to assisted living facility statutes included all the required content for two of two employees, (RN-C and ULP-D) with records reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) The orientation must contain the following topics: (1) an overview of this chapter; (2) an introduction and review of the facility's policies and procedures related to the provision of assisted living services by the individual staff person; (3) handling [...]”

    • Tag 1620: 144G.70 Subd. 2 Initial reviews, assessments, and monitoring Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) completed a comprehensive reassessment using the uniform assessment tool on day 14 for one of one resident (R5) and on day 90 for one of three residents (R1) as required with records reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(c) Resident reassessment and monitoring must be conducted no more than 14 calendar days after initiation of services. [...]”

    • Tag 1640: 144G.70 Subd. 4 Service plan, implementation, and revisions t Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure service plans were revised to reflect the current services provided for one of four residents (R4), with records reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure service plans were revised to reflect the current services provided for one of four residents (R4), with records reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) No later than 14 calendar days after the date that services are first provided, an assisted living facility shall finalize a current written service plan. [...]”

    • Tag 1650: 144G.70 Subd. 4 Service plan, implementation, and revisions t Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the service plan included the required content for four of four residents (R1, R3, R4, and R5) with records reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the service plan included the required content for four of four residents (R1, R3, R4, and R5) with records reviewed. This had the potential to affect all 21 residents who received assisted living services from the licensee. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(f) The service plan must include: (1) a description of the services to be provided, the fees for services, and the frequency of each service, according to the resident's current assessment and resident preferences; (2) the identification of staff or [...]”

    • Tag 1690: 144G.71 Subdivision 1 Medication management services Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the security and accountability of controlled substances was maintained for one of one resident (R1) with records reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) This section applies only to assisted living facilities that provide medication management services. [...]”

    • Tag 1700: 144G.71 Subd. 2 Provision of medication management services Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) conducted a face-to-face medication management assessment to include all required content for one of one resident (R5), prior to providing medication management services, with records reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) conducted a face-to-face medication management assessment to include all required content for one of one resident (R5), prior to providing medication management services, with records reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) For each resident who requests medication management services, the facility shall, prior to providing medication management services, have a registered nurse, licensed health professional, or authorized prescriber under section 151.37 conduct an [...]”

    • Tag 1710: 144G.71 Subd. 3 Individualized medication monitoring and reas Level 2, pattern scope, scope/level letter E · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) conducted a face-to-face medication management reassessment to include all required content for three of three residents (R1, R3, and R4) with records reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) conducted a face-to-face medication management reassessment to include all required content for three of three residents (R1, R3, and R4) with records reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “The assisted living facility must monitor and reassess the resident's medication management services as needed under subdivision 2 when the resident presents with symptoms or other issues that may be medication-related and, at a minimum, annually.”

    • Tag 1730: 144G.71 Subd. 5 Individualized medication management plan Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop and maintain a current individualized medication management plan for each resident to include all

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to develop and maintain a current individualized medication management plan for each resident to include all required content for four for four residents (R1, R3, R4 and R5) with records reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) For each resident receiving medication management services, the assisted living facility must prepare and include in the service plan a written statement of the medication management services that will be provided to the resident. [...]”

    • Tag 1760: 144G.71 Subd. 8 Documentation of administration of medication Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure medications were administered according to manufacturer's instructions for one of one resident (R3) with records reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure medications were administered according to manufacturer's instructions for one of one resident (R3) with records reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “Each medication administered by the assisted living facility staff must be documented in the resident's record. The documentation must include the signature and title of the person who administered the medication. [...]”

    • Tag 1770: 144G.71 Subd. 9 Documentation of medication setup Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure documentation of medication setup included all the required content for two of two residents (R1 and R4) with records reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure documentation of medication setup included all the required content for two of two residents (R1 and R4) with records reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “Documentation of dates of medication setup, name of medication, quantity of dose, times to be administered, route of administration, and name of person completing medication setup must be done at the time of setup.”

    • Tag 1790: 144G.71 Subd. 10 Medication management for residents who will Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure one of one unlicensed personnel (ULP-D) was trained and had demonstrated competency to prepare and give medications for residents having unplanned time away.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure one of one unlicensed personnel (ULP-D) was trained and had demonstrated competency to prepare and give medications for residents having unplanned time away. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(2) for unplanned time away, when the pharmacy is not able to provide the medications, a licensed nurse or unlicensed personnel shall provide medications in amounts and dosages needed for the length of the anticipated absence, not to exceed seven calendar [...]”

    • Tag 1870: 144G.71 Subd. 18 Medications provided by resident or family me Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure residents were assessed for self-administration of medications for one of one resident (R5) who self-administered medications.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure residents were assessed for self-administration of medications for one of one resident (R5) who self-administered medications. [...]”

      Rule cited: “When the assisted living facility is aware of any medications or dietary supplements that are being used by the resident and are not included in the assessment for medication management services, the staff must advise the registered nurse and document that in [...]”

    • Tag 1910: 144G.71 Subd. 22 Disposition of medications Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the resident's record contained documentation of the disposition of medications to include the medications's name, strength, prescription number as applicable, quantity, to whom the medications were given,

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the resident's record contained documentation of the disposition of medications to include the medications's name, strength, prescription number as applicable, quantity, to whom the medications were given, date of disposition, and names of staff and other individuals in the disposition for one of one discharged resident (R6), with records reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) Any current medications being managed by the assisted living facility must be provided to the resident when the resident's service plan ends or medication management services are no longer part of the service plan. [...]”

    • Tag 1940: 144G.72 Subd. 3 Individualized treatment or therapy managemen Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop and maintain a current individualized treatment and therapy management plan for each resident to include all required content for two of three residents (R4 and R5) with records reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to develop and maintain a current individualized treatment and therapy management plan for each resident to include all required content for two of three residents (R4 and R5) with records reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “For each resident receiving management of ordered or prescribed treatments or therapy services, the assisted living facility must prepare and include in the service plan a written statement of the treatment or therapy services that will be provided to the [...]”

    • Tag 1950: 144G.72 Subd. 4 Administration of treatments and therapy Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure prior to delegating

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure prior to delegating nursing tasks, the registered nurse (RN) trained unlicensed personnel (ULP) in the proper methods to perform the task or procedure for each resident, and to ensure the ULP was able to demonstrate the ability to competently follow the procedure to perform the tasks for one of one (ULP-G), who completed wound care for R4 with records reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “Ordered or prescribed treatments or therapies must be administered by a nurse, physician, or other licensed health professional authorized to perform the treatment or therapy, or may be delegated or assigned to unlicensed personnel by the licensed health [...]”

    • Tag 1960: 144G.72 Subd. 5 Documentation of administration of treatments Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to document treatment administration for one of three residents (R3) reviewed, who received treatments.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to document treatment administration for one of three residents (R3) reviewed, who received treatments. [...]”

      Rule cited: “Each treatment or therapy administered by an assisted living facility must be in the resident record. [...]”

    • Tag 2310: 144G.91 Subd. 4 Appropriate care and services Level 2, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the care and services were provided according to a suitable and up-to-date plan, and subject to acceptable health care and medical, or nursing standards for one of one resident with falls (R4) with records reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the care and services were provided according to a suitable and up-to-date plan, and subject to acceptable health care and medical, or nursing standards for one of one resident with falls (R4) with records reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) Residents have the right to care and assisted living services that are appropriate based on the resident's needs and according to an up-to-date service plan subject to accepted health care standards.”

    From MDH’s letter: no immediate fines.

What the levels and scopes mean (MDH’s words)

Level 1: “a violation that has no potential to cause more than a minimal impact on the resident and does not affect health or safety”

Level 2: “a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death”

Isolated scope: “when one or a limited number of residents are affected or one or a limited number of staff are involved, or the situation has occurred only occasionally”

Pattern scope: “when more than a limited number of residents are affected, more than a limited number of staff are involved, or the situation has occurred repeatedly; but is not found to be pervasive”

Widespread scope: “when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has affected or has the potential to affect a large portion or all of the residents”

Summaries are ours and are marked “Summary”; quoted text is MDH’s own, shortened where marked [...]. Read the full reports at the links above or search every report on MDH’s site.

What these terms mean

MDH: “An evaluation is a process regulated by the division to ensure licensees comply with the laws, rules, and certifications for the type of care and services authorized under their license/certification.”

“An investigation may occur when the division is notified that care and services are not being provided by licensees as required by law. This may include allegations of abuse, neglect, or financial misuse.”

For maltreatment, Minnesota law defines substantiated as “a preponderance of the evidence shows that an act that meets the definition of maltreatment occurred” and inconclusive as “less than a preponderance of evidence to show that maltreatment did or did not occur” (Minn. Stat. 626.5572).

Correction orders, as MDH explains on each state form: “Tag numbers have been assigned to Minnesota State Statutes for Assisted Living Facilities.” “The letter in the left column is used for tracking purposes and reflects the scope and level issued pursuant to 144G.31 subd. 1, 2, and 3.” MDH adds that there is no requirement to submit a plan of correction for violations of Minnesota state statutes.

MDH keeps investigation results for seven years when allegations are substantiated, four years when inconclusive, and three years when unsubstantiated, so the counts cover different periods. This community is licensed for 100 residents; larger communities are evaluated and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division, data as of September 28, 2026. Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.

License and ownershipActive license, licensee WINDSONG AT WOODSEDGE
License type
Assisted Living Facility
License number
424806
License status
Active
Current license dated
2026-04-01
Licensed capacity
100
Licensee
WINDSONG AT WOODSEDGE
Administrator/Authorized Agent
Jeanne Thompson

Source: Minnesota state licensing records (agency listing), retrieved 2026-09-09. Licensing status is a matter of public record; it is not a quality rating.

Administrator/Authorized Agent name from the Minnesota licensing record, as of Sep 9, 2026.

Paying with Medicaid and other programsHow Medicaid pays for care in Minnesota, and other programs

How Medicaid pays for care in Minnesota

  • Elderly Waiver (EW), customized living services. Minnesota's Elderly Waiver, part of Medical Assistance (Minnesota Medicaid), can pay for "customized living" services, and a provider of those services must hold an assisted living license (or meet certain exceptions). You must qualify for Medical Assistance and need a nursing-home level of care. (state page)

Ask the community whether it accepts Medicaid.

Location and nearby careNearest hospital 0.3 mi, nursing home 0.0 mi, pharmacy 1.0 mi
Nearest hospital with an emergency room
Sanford Bemidji Medical Center, Bemidji. 0.3 miles away, straight line. CMS overall hospital rating: 4 of 5 stars.
Nearest Medicare nursing home
Neilson Place, Bemidji. 0.0 miles away, straight line.
Nearest home health agency office
Sanford Bemidji Home Care And Hospice, Bemidji. 3.5 miles away, straight line. Agencies travel to clients, so ask which ones serve this address.
Nearest pharmacy
Walgreens. 1.0 mile away, straight line. From OpenStreetMap, which does not list every pharmacy, so one may be closer.
Area
USDA classes ZIP code 56601 as micropolitan (micropolitan high commuting).
Dialysis within 15 miles
Sanford Dialysis Bemidji, Bemidji, 0.4 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 3 of 5 stars)
Hospice
6 Medicare hospices tell CMS they serve ZIP code 56601.
Sanford Bemidji Hospice, office in Bemidji, 3.5 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 3 of 5 stars)
Nearest geriatric medicine practice
Phs Indian Hospital, Red Lake. 36.7 miles away, straight line. 1 geriatric medicine doctor listed there.

Distances are straight lines from the community, not driving distance. Hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors come from CMS provider data (CMS, hospital list updated Jul 22, 2026). Star ratings are CMS’s own.

Emergency and natural hazard riskFEMA overall risk relatively high; outside FEMA's high-risk flood areas

Public hazard maps for this location. Ask the community about its emergency plan, its generator and where residents would go in an evacuation.

Flood zone
FEMA has identified no high-risk (1% annual chance) flood area in this community. (FEMA flood map)
Wildfire risk to homes
In Bemidji, MN, risk to homes is greater than 71% of communities in Minnesota and 48% of communities nationwide. USDA rates the whole town or city, not this address. (USDA Forest Service, Wildfire Risk to Communities, April 2026)
FEMA National Risk Index
Overall: relatively high. By hazard: inland flooding very high, wildfire relatively moderate, tornado relatively moderate, heat wave relatively low, earthquake very low. These are FEMA’s ratings for the census tract, compared with tracts nationwide. (FEMA, December 2025)

A flood zone describes the map at this point, not the building's elevation. In an emergency, follow the local emergency management agency.

Questions to ask on a tour10 questions picked for this community from its record

Picked for this community from its record. Ask them in person and write down the answers.

  1. The current license dates from 2026. Has the owner or operator changed recently?
  2. Your published starting price is a base rate. What would the total monthly cost be for my parent's needs?
  3. How much have prices gone up in each of the last three years?
  4. How many caregivers are on duty during the day and at night?
  5. What happens if care needs increase? When would someone need to move?
  6. What fees are charged at move-in?
  7. How do you tell families about falls, illness or changes?
  8. How long have the executive director and the head of care been here?
  9. Who gives medications, and what training do they have?
  10. For what reasons can a resident be asked to leave?
What we checked12 public sources we searched, with dates

Every public source we searched for this community. “Nothing on record” means we found no record that matched it. A record can be missed when a name or address differs.

SourceData as ofWhat we found
Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division inspection recordsSep 28, 2026See above
U.S. Department of Labor wage and hour casesOct 15, 2026Nothing on record
OSHA workplace safety inspections since 2016Oct 15, 2026Nothing on record
FEMA flood mapSee above
USDA wildfire riskApr 15, 2026See above
FEMA National Risk IndexSee above
CMS hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors; OpenStreetMap pharmaciesSee above
HUD Multifamily Properties - AssistedJul 6, 2026Nothing on record
State Veterans Homes (NASVH directory)Sep 20, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Hospice - General InformationAug 19, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Home Health Care AgenciesMay 27, 2026Nothing on record
The community’s own websiteSee above
Common questionsAnswers to 4 questions families ask
What type of care does Windsong at Woodsedge provide?

Windsong at Woodsedge is licensed by the state of Minnesota for assisted living in Bemidji, Minnesota. Its licensed capacity is 100 residents.

Does Lilisity rate Windsong at Woodsedge?

No. We publish state licensing details for Windsong at Woodsedge but no score, rating, or ranking. Only communities on the Top Communities list or with a Senior Living Alliance Excellence Award, both based on phone-verified resident and family interviews, are ranked.

How much does Windsong at Woodsedge cost?

Assisted Living in Minnesota typically starts at $2,200 to $4,800 a month. Based on 74 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price. The starting prices it publishes are in the Prices section on this page.

How do I contact Windsong at Woodsedge?

Use Windsong at Woodsedge's website, sanfordhealth.org/locations/sanford-health-windsong/?yxt_info=sanford-location-b3a044b8-0c88-4231-b0c3-b78072f5dc9f, or visit at 1010 Anne Street Nw, Bemidji, MN 56601.

Choosing assisted livingOur care guide: what to look for, what it costs, how families pay, and more questions to ask (PDF)

Report a wrong fact

How Lilisity works. The only scores or rankings Lilisity publishes are the Top Communities list and the Excellence Awards, both built from phone-verified resident and family interviews. Communities can pay Lilisity a flat monthly fee to manage their own listing: photos, prices, contact details, and receiving the inquiries families choose to send them. The fee is the same no matter how many families contact them or move in. Senior Living Alliance, which runs Lilisity, offers the same listing to its member communities as part of their membership; members pay SLA for its resident and family interview program. No community pays Lilisity per inquiry, per referral or per move-in. Payment never changes a testimonial, a rating, or the order of search results. The "Nearby Senior Living Alliance communities" box shows member communities only. How we verify testimonials · How we are paid