Lilisity

Assisted Living and Memory Care

Vivie Senior Living of Northfi

910 Cannon Valley Drive, Northfield, MN 55057 · Map
Licensed for 140 residents · VIVIE SENIOR LIVING OF NORTHFIELD

State license active
Is this your community? Claim this listing

Vivie Senior Living of Northfi is a state-licensed assisted living, memory care community in Northfield, Minnesota. It is licensed for 140 residents. Lilisity publishes no score or ranking for this community; the details below come from the state licensing record.

Assisted LivingAlso memory care
140 residentsLicensed capacity
State licensedAssisted living facility dementia care
$2,200 to $4,800/moTypical assisted living start in Minnesota, from 74 communities that publish prices

Prices

This community does not publish its prices.

Area costs

Assisted Living in Minnesota typically starts at $2,200 to $4,800 a month. Based on 74 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price.
Memory Care in Minnesota typically starts at $3,900 to $8,600 a month. Based on 40 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price.

Care and services

From the community’s website

What Vivie Senior Living of Northfi says about itself, quoted from its own site. We have not checked these claims against licensing records. Ask about each one on a tour.

  • Offers respite or short-term stays. Respite Care (page, checked Oct 15, 2026)
  • Offers hospice care on site or works with hospice providers. Vivie offers quality home health care, hospice, and living options near you. (page, checked Oct 15, 2026)

Lilisity’s independent report

What the public record shows

Gathered by Lilisity from state and federal sources. Communities can’t edit this part of the page.

State inspections

1Substantiated investigations

Last evaluation: Sep 17, 2025. See the record

License

Active, 140 residents

Assisted Living Facility Dementia Care 426047, current license dated May 31, 2026. Licensee VIVIE SENIOR LIVING OF NORTHFIELD.

Nearest emergency room

0.5 miles

Northfield Hospital, rated 4 of 5 stars by CMS.

Side by side with nearby communities

The 4 nearest communities that offer assisted living, by straight-line distance. Prices are starting prices each community publishes; we never show estimates.

CommunityDistanceLicensed capacityPublished starting priceLicenseInspection citations
Vivie Senior Living of Northfi this community140Not publishedActive1 substantiated
Benedictine Living Community N0.6 mi135Not publishedActive0 substantiated
Valleyview of Northfield0.7 mi42Not publishedActive0 substantiated
Campus A/l0.8 mi22Not publishedActive1 substantiated
Millstream Commons1.4 mi50Not publishedActive1 substantiated
State inspection record1 substantiated
Last evaluation
September 17, 2025
Evaluations on record
2
Investigations substantiated
1 kept 7 years
Inconclusive
0 kept 4 years
Unsubstantiated
2 kept 3 years

Most recent evaluation (September 17, 2025, state report WP0U11)

MDH: “On September 15, 2025, through September 17, 2025, the Minnesota Department of Health conducted a full survey at the above provider and the following correction orders are issued.”

Survey completed September 17, 2025: 22 correction orders

  • Tag 420: 144G.40 Subdivision 1 Responsibility for housing and services Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide sufficient management, control, and operation of the housing and services provided by the facility.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to provide sufficient management, control, and operation of the housing and services provided by the facility. This had the potential to affect all residents. [...]”

    Rule cited: “The facility is directly responsible to the resident for all housing and service-related matters provided, irrespective of a management contract. [...]”

  • Tag 630: 144G.42 Subd. 6 (b) Compliance with requirements for reporting ma Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure an individual abuse prevention plan (IAPP) was developed to include the required content for four of four residents (R1, R2, R3, and R4).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure an individual abuse prevention plan (IAPP) was developed to include the required content for four of four residents (R1, R2, R3, and R4). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(b) The facility must develop and implement an individual abuse prevention plan for each vulnerable adult. [...]”

  • Tag 730: 144G.43 Subd. 3 Contents of resident record Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to include the required content in a discharge summary for one of one discharged resident (R5).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to include the required content in a discharge summary for one of one discharged resident (R5). This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death) and was issued at a widespread scope (when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that [...]”

    Rule cited: “Contents of a resident record include the following for each resident: (1) identifying information, including the resident's name, date of birth, address, and telephone number; (2) the name, address, and telephone number of the resident's emergency contact, [...]”

  • Tag 775: 144G.45 Subd. 2. (a) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days · fine: $500.00 assessed
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to comply with the Minnesota State Fire

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to comply with the Minnesota State Fire Code (MSFC) in Minnesota Rules, chapter 7511. This had the potential to directly affect all residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”

    Rule cited: “Each assisted living facility must comply with the State Fire Code in Minnesota Rules, chapter 7511, and:”

  • Tag 780: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (1) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days · fine: $500.00 assessed
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide smoke alarms in sleeping rooms and outside sleeping room and failed to provide smoke alarms that are interconnected so that actuation of one alarm causes all alarms in the dwelling unit to actuate.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to provide smoke alarms in sleeping rooms and outside sleeping room and failed to provide smoke alarms that are interconnected so that actuation of one alarm causes all alarms in the dwelling unit to actuate. This deficient condition had the ability to affect all staff and residents. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) Each assisted living facility must comply with the State Fire Code in Minnesota Rules, chapter 7511, and: (1) for dwellings or sleeping units, as defined in the State Fire Code: (i) provide smoke alarms in each room used for sleeping purposes; (ii) [...]”

Show all 22
  • Tag 810: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (b-f) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop the fire safety and evacuation plan with the required content, failed to provide the required training, and failed to provide the required drills.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on the interview and record review, the licensee failed to develop the fire safety and evacuation plan with the required content, failed to provide the required training, and failed to provide the required drills. This had the potential to directly affect all residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(b) Each assisted living facility shall develop and maintain fire safety and evacuation plans. [...]”

  • Tag 1620: 144G.70 Subd. 2 (c-e) Initial reviews, assessments, and monitoring Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) conducted ongoing nursing assessments not to exceed 90 days for two of four residents (R2 and R4).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) conducted ongoing nursing assessments not to exceed 90 days for two of four residents (R2 and R4). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) Residents who are not receiving any assisted living services shall not be required to undergo an initial nursing assessment. [...]”

  • Tag 1640: 144G.70 Subd. 4 (a-e) Service plan, implementation and revisions to Level 2, pattern scope, scope/level letter E · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure a written service plan was revised to reflect the current services provided for four of four residents (R1, R2, R3, and R4).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure a written service plan was revised to reflect the current services provided for four of four residents (R1, R2, R3, and R4). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) No later than 14 calendar days after the date that services are first provided, an assisted living facility shall finalize a current written service plan. [...]”

  • Tag 1650: 144G.70 Subd. 4 (f) Service plan, implementation and revisions to Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the service plan included all required content for four of four residents (R1, R2, R3, and R4). This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death) and was issued at a widespread scope (when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic [...]”

    Rule cited: “(f) The service plan must include: (1) a description of the services to be provided, the fees for services, and the frequency of each service, according to the resident's current assessment and resident preferences; (2) the identification of staff or [...]”

  • Tag 1700: 144G.71 Subd. 2 Provision of medication management services Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) conducted a face-to-face medication management assessment which included the required content for four of four residents (R1, R2, R3, and R4).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) conducted a face-to-face medication management assessment which included the required content for four of four residents (R1, R2, R3, and R4). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) For each resident who requests medication management services, the facility shall, prior to providing medication management services, have a registered nurse, licensed health professional, or authorized prescriber under section 151.37 conduct an [...]”

  • Tag 1730: 144G.71 Subd. 5 Individualized medication management plan Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop an individualized medication management plan with the required content for four of four residents (R1, R2, R3, and R4).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to develop an individualized medication management plan with the required content for four of four residents (R1, R2, R3, and R4). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) For each resident receiving medication management services, a registered nurse, advanced practice registered nurse, or qualified staff delegated the task by a registered nurse must prepare and include in the service plan a written statement of the [...]”

  • Tag 1750: 144G.71 Subd. 7 Delegation of medication administration Level 2, pattern scope, scope/level letter E · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse documented resident-specific instructions for four of four residents (R1, R2, R3,

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse documented resident-specific instructions for four of four residents (R1, R2, R3, and R4) whose medication administration was delegated to unlicensed personnel (ULP). [...]”

    Rule cited: “When administration of medications is delegated to unlicensed personnel, the assisted living facility must ensure that the registered nurse has: (1) instructed the unlicensed personnel in the proper methods to administer the medications, and the unlicensed [...]”

  • Tag 1770: 144G.71 Subd. 9 Documentation of medication setup Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure documentation of medication set up included all the required content for one of one resident (R1).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure documentation of medication set up included all the required content for one of one resident (R1). [...]”

    Rule cited: “Documentation of dates of medication setup, name of medication, quantity of dose, times to be administered, route of administration, and name of person completing medication setup must be done at the time of setup.”

  • Tag 1790: 144G.71 Subd. 10 Medication management for residents who will Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) ensure training and competencies were documented for two of two unlicensed personnel (ULP-C and ULP-F) providing medications to residents for unplanned time away from home when the licensed nurse was not available.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) ensure training and competencies were documented for two of two unlicensed personnel (ULP-C and ULP-F) providing medications to residents for unplanned time away from home when the licensed nurse was not available. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(2) for unplanned time away, when the pharmacy is not able to provide the medications, a licensed nurse or unlicensed personnel shall provide medications in amounts and dosages needed for the length of the anticipated absence, not to exceed seven calendar [...]”

  • Tag 1880: 144G.71 Subd. 19 Storage of medications Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure medications were secure and permitted access to only authorized personnel.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure medications were secure and permitted access to only authorized personnel. This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death) and was issued at a widespread scope (when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure [...]”

    Rule cited: “An assisted living facility must store all prescription medications in securely locked and substantially constructed compartments according to the manufacturer's directions and permit only authorized personnel to have access.”

  • Tag 1910: 144G.71 Subd. 22 Disposition of medications Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to document in the resident's record the disposition of the medications as required for one of one discharged resident (R5).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to document in the resident's record the disposition of the medications as required for one of one discharged resident (R5). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) Any current medications being managed by the assisted living facility must be provided to the resident when the resident's service plan ends or medication management services are no longer part of the service plan. [...]”

  • Tag 1940: 144G.72 Subd. 3 Individualized treatment or therapy managemen Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop and implement a treatment or therapy management plan to include all required content for four of four residents (R1, R2, R3, and R4) with treatments.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to develop and implement a treatment or therapy management plan to include all required content for four of four residents (R1, R2, R3, and R4) with treatments. [...]”

    Rule cited: “For each resident receiving management of ordered or prescribed treatments or therapy services, the assisted living facility must prepare and include in the service plan a written statement of the treatment or therapy services that will be provided to the [...]”

  • Tag 1960: 144G.72 Subd. 5 Documentation of administration of treatments Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure treatment or therapies were administered as prescribed, or to document the reason they were not provided, for one of four residents (R2).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure treatment or therapies were administered as prescribed, or to document the reason they were not provided, for one of four residents (R2). [...]”

    Rule cited: “Each treatment or therapy administered by an assisted living facility must be in the resident record. [...]”

  • Tag 1970: 144G.72 Subd. 6 Treatment and therapy orders Level 2, pattern scope, scope/level letter E · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure up-to-date written or electronically recorded orders were maintained for four of four residents (R1, R2, R3, and R4) receiving treatments.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure up-to-date written or electronically recorded orders were maintained for four of four residents (R1, R2, R3, and R4) receiving treatments. [...]”

    Rule cited: “There must be an up-to-date written or electronically recorded order from an authorized prescriber for all treatments and therapies. [...]”

  • Tag 2170: 144G.84 SERVICES FOR RESIDENTS WITH DEMENTIA Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to conduct an individualized written activity evaluation that addressed all six provisions for two of three residents (R3 and R4) who received services under the assisted living with dementia care license and resided in the secure memory care unit.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to conduct an individualized written activity evaluation that addressed all six provisions for two of three residents (R3 and R4) who received services under the assisted living with dementia care license and resided in the secure memory care unit. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(b) Each resident must be evaluated for activities according to the licensing rules of the facility. [...]”

  • Tag 2310: 144G.91 Subd. 4 (a) Appropriate care and services Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Two (2) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure care and services were provided according to acceptable health care and medical or nursing standards for one of one resident (R2) with bed rails.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure care and services were provided according to acceptable health care and medical or nursing standards for one of one resident (R2) with bed rails. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) Residents have the right to care and assisted living services that are appropriate based on the resident's needs and according to an up-to-date service plan subject to accepted health care standards.”

  • Tag 2320: 144G.91 Subd. 4 (b) Appropriate care and services Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure care and services were provided according to acceptable health care and medical or nursing standards for the licensee's one of five residents (R7) who received medication administration services. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(b) Residents have the right to receive health care and other assisted living services with continuity from people who are properly trained and competent to perform their duties and in sufficient numbers to adequately provide the services agreed to in the [...]”

From MDH’s letter: the letter says the facility is in substantial compliance.

Food and beverage inspection (included in this report): Food and beverage inspection report included

Fines assessed by MDH

  • Tag 775 (144g.45 Subd.2. (a) - Fire Protection And PhysicalEnvironment): $500.00
  • Tag 780 (144g.45 Subd.2 (a) (1) - Fire Protection And PhysicalEnvironment): $500.00

Total fines assessed, as printed in the letter: $1,000.00.

Earlier evaluations (1)
  • December 21, 2022: report N9JF11 · 9 correction orders
    Details

    Survey completed December 21, 2022: 9 correction orders

    • Tag 480: 144G.41 Subd 1 (13) (i) (B) Minimum requirements Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code. This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety) and was issued at a widespread scope (when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has affected or has the potential to affect a large portion or all the [...]”

      Rule cited: “(13) offer to provide or make available at least the following services to residents: (i) at least three nutritious meals daily with snacks available seven days per week, according to the recommended dietary allowances in the United States Department of [...]”

    • Tag 1060: 144G.52 Subd. 9 Emergency relocation Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide a written notice with the required content for an emergency relocation to the resident, legal representative, or designated representative for one of one resident (R6) who had an emergency relocation.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to provide a written notice with the required content for an emergency relocation to the resident, legal representative, or designated representative for one of one resident (R6) who had an emergency relocation. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) A facility may remove a resident from the facility in an emergency if necessary due to a resident's urgent medical needs or an imminent risk the resident poses to the health or safety of another facility resident or facility staff member. [...]”

    • Tag 1440: 144G.62 Subd. 4 Supervision of staff providing delegated nurs Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure direct supervision of staff performing delegated tasks was provided within 30 calendar days after the date on which the individual begins working for the licensee for one of one unlicensed personnel (ULP-B).

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure direct supervision of staff performing delegated tasks was provided within 30 calendar days after the date on which the individual begins working for the licensee for one of one unlicensed personnel (ULP-B). [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) Staff who perform delegated nursing or therapy tasks must be supervised by an appropriate licensed health professional or a registered nurse according to the assisted living facility's policy where the services are being provided to verify that the work [...]”

    • Tag 1470: 144G.63 Subd. 2 Content of required orientation Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure orientation to assisted living statutes included all the required content for two of two employees (registered nurse (RN)-A, unlicensed personnel (ULP)-B).

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure orientation to assisted living statutes included all the required content for two of two employees (registered nurse (RN)-A, unlicensed personnel (ULP)-B). [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) The orientation must contain the following topics: (1) an overview of this chapter; (2) an introduction and review of the facility's policies and procedures related to the provision of assisted living services by the individual staff person; (3) handling [...]”

    • Tag 1540: 144G.64 (a) TRAINING IN DEMENTIA CARE REQUIRED Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure employees had completed at least eight (8) hours of initial dementia training within 80 working hours of the employment start date for one of two employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-B).

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure employees had completed at least eight (8) hours of initial dementia training within 80 working hours of the employment start date for one of two employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-B). [...]”

      Rule cited: “(3) for assisted living facilities with dementia care, direct-care employees must have completed at least eight hours of initial training on topics specified under paragraph (b) within 80 working hours of the employment start date. [...]”

    Show all 9
    • Tag 1620: 144G.70 Subd. 2 (c-e) Initial reviews, assessments, and monitoring Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) conducted ongoing resident monitoring and reassessment not to exceed 90 calendar days from the last date of assessment for four of four residents (R2, R3, R4, R5).

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) conducted ongoing resident monitoring and reassessment not to exceed 90 calendar days from the last date of assessment for four of four residents (R2, R3, R4, R5). [...]”

      Rule cited: “(c) Resident reassessment and monitoring must be conducted no more than 14 calendar days after initiation of services. [...]”

    • Tag 1640: 144G.70 Subd. 4 (a-e) Service plan, implementation and revisions to Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the current service plan included a signature or other authentication by resident or resident representative to document agreement on the services to be provided for one of four residents (R2).

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the current service plan included a signature or other authentication by resident or resident representative to document agreement on the services to be provided for one of four residents (R2). [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) No later than 14 calendar days after the date that services are first provided, an assisted living facility shall finalize a current written service plan. [...]”

    • Tag 1880: 144G.71 Subd. 19 Storage of medications Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to store medications according to the manufacturer's directions for one of one resident (R2) who required insulin.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to store medications according to the manufacturer's directions for one of one resident (R2) who required insulin. [...]”

      Rule cited: “An assisted living facility must store all prescription medications in securely locked and substantially constructed compartments according to the manufacturer's directions and permit only authorized personnel to have access.”

    • Tag 2110: 144G.82 Subd. 3 Policies Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the assisted living facility with dementia care provided the required policies and procedures to four of four residents (R1, R2, R3, R4).

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the assisted living facility with dementia care provided the required policies and procedures to four of four residents (R1, R2, R3, R4). [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) In addition to the policies and procedures required in the licensing of all facilities, the assisted living facility with dementia care licensee must develop and implement policies and procedures that address the: (1) philosophy of how services are [...]”

    From MDH’s letter: no immediate fines.

Substantiated investigations (state reports)

  • October 3, 2022 · report HL200961080M · MDH finding: Substantiated, individual responsibility
    Details

    Allegation, as written: “The resident was financially exploited when the alleged perpetrator (AP) took tablets of the resident's narcotic medication for her personal use.”

    “The Minnesota Department of Health determined financial exploitation was substantiated.”

    “The AP was responsible for the maltreatment.”

    Summary: MDH looked into an allegation and found: financial exploitation substantiated (individual responsibility).

    MDH’s conclusion, as written: “The Minnesota Department of Health determined financial exploitation was substantiated. The AP was responsible for the maltreatment. The AP admitted to taking the resident's hydrocodone tablets (a narcotic medication) and replacing them with unmarked pills.”

    Action taken by facility: “The facility conducted an internal investigation and provided training to staff regarding medication administration. The AP no longer works for the facility.”

    Action taken by MDH: “The facility was found to be in noncompliance.”

    Survey completed September 7, 2022: 3 correction orders

    • Tag 650: 144G.42 Subd. 8 Employee records Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Fourteen
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the facility failed to ensure the employee record contained the required content for three of three employees reviewed, registered nurse (RN)-H, health unit coordinator (HUC)-C, and unlicensed personnel (ULP)-G with records reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the employee record contained the required content for three of three employees reviewed, registered nurse (RN)-H, health unit coordinator (HUC)-C, and unlicensed personnel (ULP)-G with records reviewed. This had the potential to affect all residents residing at the facility. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) The facility must maintain current records of each paid employee, each regularly scheduled volunteer providing services, and each individual contractor providing services. [...]”

    • Tag 1460: 144G.63 Subdivision 1 Orientation of staff and supervisors Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the facility failed to provide staff orientation to assisted living licensing requirements and regulations for one of three employees unlicensed personnel (ULP)-G with records reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide staff orientation to assisted living licensing requirements and regulations for one of three employees unlicensed personnel (ULP)-G with records reviewed. This had the potential to affect all residents receiving services from the facility. [...]”

      Rule cited: “All staff providing and supervising direct services must complete an orientation to assisted living facility licensing requirements and regulations before providing assisted living services to residents. [...]”

    • Tag 2360: 144G.91 Subd. 8 Freedom from maltreatment
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the facility failed to ensure one of the residents (R1) was free from maltreatment.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observations, interviews, and document review, the facility failed to ensure one of the residents (R1) was free from maltreatment. R1 was financially exploited. Findings include: On September 7, 2022, the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) issued a determination that drug diversion occurred, and that an individual staff person was responsible for the maltreatment, in connection with incidents which occurred at the facility. [...]”

      Rule cited: “Residents have the right to be free from physical, sexual, and emotional abuse; neglect; financial exploitation; and all forms of maltreatment covered under the Vulnerable Adults Act.”

Unsubstantiated investigations (2)
  • August 28, 2024 · report HL200964462M · MDH finding: Not Substantiated
    Details

    Allegation, as written: “The alleged perpetrator (AP), a facility staff unlicensed caregiver, neglected the resident when the resident's plan of care was not followed, resulting in a fall that fractured the resident's hip.”

    “The Minnesota Department of Health determined neglect was not substantiated.”

    Summary: MDH looked into an allegation and found: neglect not substantiated.

    MDH’s conclusion, as written: “The Minnesota Department of Health determined neglect was not substantiated. Although the AP did not transfer the resident as directed in the resident's care plan and the resident fell, the error was an isolated incident. The AP at the time of the incident was not assigned to the resident and did not have immediate access to the resident's plan of care.”

    Action taken by facility: “The facility investigated the incident, the AP was suspended, and retraining was provided.”

    Action taken by MDH: “No further action taken at this time.”

    Survey completed August 15, 2024: no correction orders issued.

  • November 22, 2023 · report HL200966323M · MDH finding: Not Substantiated
    Details

    Allegation, as written: “The facility neglected a resident when a staff member left them alone in the bathroom, resulting in the resident's fall.”

    “The Minnesota Department of Health determined neglect was not substantiated.”

    Summary: MDH looked into an allegation and found: neglect not substantiated.

    MDH’s conclusion, as written: “The Minnesota Department of Health determined neglect was not substantiated. Although the resident fell, the error was an isolated incident. The resident suffered a hematoma on their forehead, received treatment in the Emergency Room (ER), and returned to their baseline health condition.”

    Action taken by facility: “After the resident's discharge, the facility conducted a focused assessment. A new intervention was implemented, requiring staff to remain within arm's reach of the resident at all times. Additionally, chair and bed alarms were installed, and the resident's room was relocated closer to the nurse's station.”

    Action taken by MDH: “No further action taken at this time.”

    Survey completed October 24, 2023: no correction orders issued.

What the levels and scopes mean (MDH’s words)

Level 2: “a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death”

Isolated scope: “when one or a limited number of residents are affected or one or a limited number of staff are involved, or the situation has occurred only occasionally”

Pattern scope: “when more than a limited number of residents are affected, more than a limited number of staff are involved, or the situation has occurred repeatedly; but is not found to be pervasive”

Widespread scope: “when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has affected or has the potential to affect a large portion or all of the residents”

Summaries are ours and are marked “Summary”; quoted text is MDH’s own, shortened where marked [...]. Read the full reports at the links above or search every report on MDH’s site.

What these terms mean

MDH: “An evaluation is a process regulated by the division to ensure licensees comply with the laws, rules, and certifications for the type of care and services authorized under their license/certification.”

“An investigation may occur when the division is notified that care and services are not being provided by licensees as required by law. This may include allegations of abuse, neglect, or financial misuse.”

For maltreatment, Minnesota law defines substantiated as “a preponderance of the evidence shows that an act that meets the definition of maltreatment occurred” and inconclusive as “less than a preponderance of evidence to show that maltreatment did or did not occur” (Minn. Stat. 626.5572).

Correction orders, as MDH explains on each state form: “Tag numbers have been assigned to Minnesota State Statutes for Assisted Living Facilities.” “The letter in the left column is used for tracking purposes and reflects the scope and level issued pursuant to 144G.31 subd. 1, 2, and 3.” MDH adds that there is no requirement to submit a plan of correction for violations of Minnesota state statutes.

MDH keeps investigation results for seven years when allegations are substantiated, four years when inconclusive, and three years when unsubstantiated, so the counts cover different periods. This community is licensed for 140 residents; larger communities are evaluated and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division, data as of September 28, 2026. Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.

License and ownershipActive license, licensee VIVIE SENIOR LIVING OF NORTHFIELD
License type
Assisted Living Facility Dementia Care
License number
426047
License status
Active
Current license dated
2026-05-31
Licensed capacity
140
Licensee
VIVIE SENIOR LIVING OF NORTHFIELD
Executive Director
Mallory Dingman

Source: Minnesota state licensing records (agency listing), retrieved 2026-09-09. Licensing status is a matter of public record; it is not a quality rating.

Executive Director name from public records we reviewed, as of Feb 18, 2025.

Paying with Medicaid and other programsHow Medicaid pays for care in Minnesota, and other programs

How Medicaid pays for care in Minnesota

  • Elderly Waiver (EW), customized living services. Minnesota's Elderly Waiver, part of Medical Assistance (Minnesota Medicaid), can pay for "customized living" services, and a provider of those services must hold an assisted living license (or meet certain exceptions). You must qualify for Medical Assistance and need a nursing-home level of care. (state page)

Ask the community whether it accepts Medicaid.

Location and nearby careNearest hospital 0.5 mi, nursing home 0.9 mi, pharmacy 1.1 mi
Nearest hospital with an emergency room
Northfield Hospital, Northfield. 0.5 miles away, straight line. CMS overall hospital rating: 4 of 5 stars.
Nearest Medicare nursing home
Three Links Care Center, Northfield. 0.9 miles away, straight line.
Nearest home health agency office
Jb Kummer Enterprises LLC, Farmington. 11.6 miles away, straight line. Agencies travel to clients, so ask which ones serve this address.
Nearest pharmacy
Walgreens. 1.1 miles away, straight line. From OpenStreetMap, which does not list every pharmacy, so one may be closer.
Area
USDA classes ZIP code 55057 as micropolitan (micropolitan core).
Dialysis within 15 miles
Davita Northfield At Home, Northfield, 2.0 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 1 of 5 stars)
Fmc - Cannon Valley, Dundas, 5.3 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 4 of 5 stars)
Davita Faribault Dialysis Unit, Faribault, 13.5 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 4 of 5 stars)
Hospice
13 Medicare hospices tell CMS they serve ZIP code 55057.
Minnesota Hospice LLC, office in Lakeville, 16.4 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 5 of 5 stars)
Nearest geriatric medicine practice
Southern Cities Clinic, Faribault. 12.9 miles away, straight line. 1 geriatric medicine doctor listed there.

Distances are straight lines from the community, not driving distance. Hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors come from CMS provider data (CMS, hospital list updated Jul 22, 2026). Star ratings are CMS’s own.

Emergency and natural hazard riskFEMA overall risk relatively moderate; outside FEMA's high-risk flood areas

Public hazard maps for this location. Ask the community about its emergency plan, its generator and where residents would go in an evacuation.

Flood zone
Outside the high and moderate risk flood areas on FEMA's flood map (Zone X, minimal flood hazard, or not studied). (FEMA flood map)
FEMA National Risk Index
Overall: relatively moderate. By hazard: inland flooding relatively moderate, wildfire very low, tornado very high, heat wave relatively low, earthquake very low. These are FEMA’s ratings for the census tract, compared with tracts nationwide. (FEMA, December 2025)

A flood zone describes the map at this point, not the building's elevation. In an emergency, follow the local emergency management agency.

Questions to ask on a tour10 questions picked for this community from its record

Picked for this community from its record. Ask them in person and write down the answers.

  1. The current license dates from 2026. Has the owner or operator changed recently?
  2. What does the base rate include, and when did rates last go up?
  3. How many caregivers work in memory care during the day, the evening and overnight, and for how many residents?
  4. What dementia training does each caregiver get before working alone, and every year after?
  5. How do staff respond when a resident is agitated, frightened or tries to leave?
  6. How many caregivers are on duty during the day and at night?
  7. What happens if care needs increase? When would someone need to move?
  8. What fees are charged at move-in?
  9. How do you tell families about falls, illness or changes?
  10. How long have the executive director and the head of care been here?
What we checked12 public sources we searched, with dates

Every public source we searched for this community. “Nothing on record” means we found no record that matched it. A record can be missed when a name or address differs.

SourceData as ofWhat we found
Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division inspection recordsSep 28, 2026See above
U.S. Department of Labor wage and hour casesOct 15, 2026Nothing on record
OSHA workplace safety inspections since 2016Oct 15, 2026Nothing on record
FEMA flood mapSee above
USDA wildfire riskApr 15, 2026Not shown: FEMA rates wildfire risk here very low
FEMA National Risk IndexSee above
CMS hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors; OpenStreetMap pharmaciesSee above
HUD Multifamily Properties - AssistedJul 6, 2026Nothing on record
State Veterans Homes (NASVH directory)Sep 20, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Hospice - General InformationAug 19, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Home Health Care AgenciesMay 27, 2026Nothing on record
The community’s own websiteSee above
Common questionsAnswers to 4 questions families ask
What type of care does Vivie Senior Living of Northfi provide?

Vivie Senior Living of Northfi is licensed by the state of Minnesota for assisted living, memory care in Northfield, Minnesota. Its licensed capacity is 140 residents.

Does Lilisity rate Vivie Senior Living of Northfi?

No. We publish state licensing details for Vivie Senior Living of Northfi but no score, rating, or ranking. Only communities on the Top Communities list or with a Senior Living Alliance Excellence Award, both based on phone-verified resident and family interviews, are ranked.

How much does Vivie Senior Living of Northfi cost?

Assisted Living in Minnesota typically starts at $2,200 to $4,800 a month. Based on 74 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price. Vivie Senior Living of Northfi does not publish its prices.

How do I contact Vivie Senior Living of Northfi?

Use Vivie Senior Living of Northfi's website, vivie.org, or visit at 910 Cannon Valley Drive, Northfield, MN 55057.

Choosing assisted livingOur care guide: what to look for, what it costs, how families pay, and more questions to ask (PDF)

Report a wrong fact

How Lilisity works. The only scores or rankings Lilisity publishes are the Top Communities list and the Excellence Awards, both built from phone-verified resident and family interviews. Communities can pay Lilisity a flat monthly fee to manage their own listing: photos, prices, contact details, and receiving the inquiries families choose to send them. The fee is the same no matter how many families contact them or move in. Senior Living Alliance, which runs Lilisity, offers the same listing to its member communities as part of their membership; members pay SLA for its resident and family interview program. No community pays Lilisity per inquiry, per referral or per move-in. Payment never changes a testimonial, a rating, or the order of search results. The "Nearby Senior Living Alliance communities" box shows member communities only. How we verify testimonials · How we are paid