Assisted Living and Memory Care
Vitacare Living, 102 North 58th Avenue West
102 North 58th Avenue West, Duluth, MN 55807 · Map
Licensed for 11 residents · VITACARE LIVING
Vitacare Living, 102 North 58th Avenue West is a state-licensed assisted living, memory care community in Duluth, Minnesota. It is licensed for 11 residents. Lilisity publishes no score or ranking for this community; the details below come from the state licensing record.
Prices
This community does not publish its prices.
Area costs
Lilisity’s independent report
What the public record shows
Gathered by Lilisity from state and federal sources. Communities can’t edit this part of the page.
License
Active, 11 residents
Assisted Living Facility Dementia Care 425715, current license dated May 1, 2026. Licensee VITACARE LIVING.
Nearest emergency room
4.1 miles
St Marys Hospital Superior.
Side by side with nearby communities
The 4 nearest communities that offer assisted living, by straight-line distance. Prices are starting prices each community publishes; we never show estimates.
| Community | Distance | Licensed capacity | Published starting price | License | Inspection citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vitacare Living, 102 North 58th Avenue West this community | 11 | Not published | Active | 2 substantiated | |
| Vitacare Living, 101 North 58th Avenue West | 0.0 mi | 11 | Not published | Active | 0 substantiated |
| Wesley Residence of Duluth | 0.4 mi | 43 | Not published | Active | 0 substantiated |
| Rem Wisconsin III Belknap | 2.1 mi | 6 | $3,996/mo | Active | No record |
| Vitacare Living | 2.3 mi | 30 | Not published | Active | 0 substantiated |
State inspection record2 substantiated
- Last evaluation
- July 16, 2025
- Evaluations on record
- 2
- Investigations substantiated
- 2 kept 7 years
- Inconclusive
- 0 kept 4 years
- Unsubstantiated
- 1 kept 3 years
Most recent evaluation (July 16, 2025, state report 5DR911)
MDH: “On July 15, 2025, through July 16, 2025, the Minnesota Department of Health conducted a full survey at the above provider and the following correction orders are issued.”
Survey completed July 16, 2025: 9 correction orders
- Tag 480: 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Subd. 1a (a-b) Minimum requirements; required food services Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Please refer to the FBEIR for any compliance dates
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code. This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death), and is issued at a widespread scope (when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b), food must be prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code, Minnesota Rules, chapter 4626. [...]”
- Tag 775: 144G.45 Subd. 2. (a) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to comply with the requirements of Minnesota State Fire Code Rules, Chapter 7511.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to comply with the requirements of Minnesota State Fire Code Rules, Chapter 7511. This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death), and was issued at an isolated scope (when one or a limited number of residents are affected or one or a limited [...]”
Rule cited: “Each assisted living facility must comply with the State Fire Code in Minnesota Rules, chapter 7511, and:”
- Tag 780: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (1) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, pattern scope, scope/level letter E · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide smoke alarms that complied with fire protection requirements.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to provide smoke alarms that complied with fire protection requirements. This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death) and was issued at a pattern scope (when more than a limited number of residents are affected, more than a limited number of [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) Each assisted living facility must comply with the State Fire Code in Minnesota Rules, chapter 7511, and: (1) for dwellings or sleeping units, as defined in the State Fire Code: (i) provide smoke alarms in each room used for sleeping purposes; (ii) [...]”
- Tag 810: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (b-f) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop and maintain the fire safety and evacuation plan with
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to develop and maintain the fire safety and evacuation plan with required content, and provide required training and drills. This had the potential to directly affect all residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”
Rule cited: “(b) Each assisted living facility shall develop and maintain fire safety and evacuation plans. [...]”
- Tag 1060: 144G.52 Subd. 9 Emergency relocation Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide written notice with required content to the resident, legal representative, and/or designated representative for two of two residents (R2, R3) reviewed for a hospitalization.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to provide written notice with required content to the resident, legal representative, and/or designated representative for two of two residents (R2, R3) reviewed for a hospitalization. In addition, the licensee failed to provide the notification to the Office of Ombudsman for Long-Term Care (OOLTC) when the resident did not return from the emergency relocation within four days for one of one resident (R3) reviewed for a hospitalization. [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) A facility may remove a resident from the facility in an emergency if necessary due to a resident's urgent medical needs or an imminent risk the resident poses to the health or safety of another facility resident or facility staff member. [...]”
Show all 9
- Tag 1290: 144G.60 Subdivision 1 Background studies required Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Two (2) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure a background study (BGS) was submitted and a clearance was received in affiliation with the assisted living licensee's current health facility identification (HFID) for one of eight employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-G).
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure a background study (BGS) was submitted and a clearance was received in affiliation with the assisted living licensee's current health facility identification (HFID) for one of eight employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-G). This had the potential to affect all residents. [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) Employees, contractors, and regularly scheduled volunteers of the facility are subject to the background study required by section 144.057 and may be disqualified under chapter 245C. [...]”
- Tag 1530: 144G.64 (a) (1-2) Training in Dementia, Mental Illness, and De- Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure direct care staff received the required two hours of initial training on mental illness and de-escalation topics
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure direct care staff received the required two hours of initial training on mental illness and de-escalation topics for three of three employees (licensed assisted living director/clinical nurse supervisor (LALD/CNS)-A, (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-C, (culinary director (CD)-D). This had the potential affect all residents and staff. [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) All assisted living facilities must meet the following dementia care, mental illness, and de-escalation training requirements: (1) supervisors of direct-care staff must have at least eight hours of initial training on dementia topics specified under [...]”
- Tag 1950: 144G.72 Subd. 4 Administration of treatments and therapy Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) prepared in writing specific instructions for each resident and documented those instructions for one of one resident (R2) receiving blood pressure monitoring.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) prepared in writing specific instructions for each resident and documented those instructions for one of one resident (R2) receiving blood pressure monitoring. [...]”
Rule cited: “Ordered or prescribed treatments or therapies must be administered by a nurse, physician, or other licensed health professional authorized to perform the treatment or therapy, or may be delegated or assigned to unlicensed personnel by the licensed health [...]”
- Tag 2320: 144G.91 Subd. 4 (b) Appropriate care and services Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide care and services according to acceptable health care medical or nursing standards for medication administration by unlicensed personnel (ULP)-F for one of one resident (R2) whose medications were not administered as directed.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to provide care and services according to acceptable health care medical or nursing standards for medication administration by unlicensed personnel (ULP)-F for one of one resident (R2) whose medications were not administered as directed. [...]”
Rule cited: “(b) Residents have the right to receive health care and other assisted living services with continuity from people who are properly trained and competent to perform their duties and in sufficient numbers to adequately provide the services agreed to in the [...]”
From MDH’s letter: the letter says the facility is in substantial compliance; no immediate fines.
Food and beverage inspection (included in this report): Food and beverage inspection report included
Earlier evaluations (1)
- December 7, 2022: report PPI111 · 127 correction orders
Details
Survey completed May 9, 2023: 4 correction orders
- Tag 680: 144G.42 Subd. 10 Disaster planning and emergency preparedness (re-issued) Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop an emergency preparedness plan (EPP) with all required content, or practice and document testing of the plan at least twice annually as required.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to develop an emergency preparedness plan (EPP) with all required content, or practice and document testing of the plan at least twice annually as required. This had the potential to affect all residents, staff, and visitors of the facility. [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) The facility must meet the following requirements: (1) have a written emergency disaster plan that contains a plan for evacuation, addresses elements of sheltering in place, identifies temporary relocation sites, and details staff assignments in the event [...]”
- Tag 1380: 144G.61 Subd. 2 (b) Training and evaluation of unlicensed personn (re-issued) Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure training and competency evaluations included all the required training for one of three employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-G).
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure training and competency evaluations included all the required training for one of three employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-G). [...]”
Rule cited: “(b) In addition to paragraph (a), training and competency evaluation for unlicensed personnel providing assisted living services must include: (1) observing, reporting, and documenting resident status; (2) basic knowledge of body functioning and changes in [...]”
- Tag 1620: 144G.70 Subd. 2 (c-e) Initial reviews, assessments, and monitoring (re-issued) Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure a registered nurse (RN) completed an assessment of one of one resident's skin (R4).
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure a registered nurse (RN) completed an assessment of one of one resident's skin (R4). This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death), and was issued at an isolated scope (when one or a limited number of residents are affected or one or a [...]”
Rule cited: “(c) Resident reassessment and monitoring must be conducted no more than 14 calendar days after initiation of services. [...]”
- Tag 1760: 144G.71 Subd. 8 Documentation of administration of medication (re-issued) Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D
Details
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review the licensee failed to ensure medications were administered as prescribed for one of two residents (R1). This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death), and was issued at an isolated scope (when one or a limited number of residents are affected or one or a limited [...]”
Rule cited: “Each medication administered by the assisted living facility staff must be documented in the resident's record. The documentation must include the signature and title of the person who administered the medication. [...]”
Survey completed March 15, 2023: 18 correction orders
- Tag 250: 144G.20 Subdivision 1 Conditions (re-issued) Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to show they met the requirements of licensure, by attesting the managerial officials who oversaw the day-to-day operations understood applicable statutes and rules; nor
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to show they met the requirements of licensure, by attesting the managerial officials who oversaw the day-to-day operations understood applicable statutes and rules; nor developed and/or implemented current policies and procedures as required with records reviewed. This had the potential to affect all residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) The commissioner may refuse to grant a provisional license, refuse to grant a license as a result of a change in ownership, refuse to renew a license, suspend or revoke a license, or impose a conditional license if the owner, controlling individual, or [...]”
- Tag 430: 144G.40 Subd. 2 Uniform checklist disclosure of services (re-issued) Level 1, widespread scope, scope/level letter C
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide a copy of the uniform checklist disclosure of services (UDALSA) with the required content for two of two residents (R1, R4).
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to provide a copy of the uniform checklist disclosure of services (UDALSA) with the required content for two of two residents (R1, R4). [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) All assisted living facilities must provide to prospective residents: (1) a disclosure of the categories of assisted living licenses available and the category of license held by the facility; (2) a written checklist listing all services permitted under [...]”
- Tag 630: 144G.42 Subd. 6 (b) Compliance with requirements for reporting ma (re-issued) Level 2, pattern scope, scope/level letter E
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop an individual abuse prevention plan with all required content for two of two residents (R1, R4).
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to develop an individual abuse prevention plan with all required content for two of two residents (R1, R4). This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death) and was issued at a pattern scope (when more than a limited number of residents are [...]”
Rule cited: “(b) The facility must develop and implement an individual abuse prevention plan for each vulnerable adult. [...]”
- Tag 650: 144G.42 Subd. 8 Employee records (re-issued) Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure employee records included a job description with all for the required content for one of three employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-G).
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure employee records included a job description with all for the required content for one of three employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-G). [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) The facility must maintain current records of each paid employee, each regularly scheduled volunteer providing services, and each individual contractor providing services. [...]”
- Tag 660: 144G.42 Subd. 9 Tuberculosis prevention and control (re-issued) Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to maintain a tuberculosis (TB) prevention and control program, based on the most current guidelines issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to maintain a tuberculosis (TB) prevention and control program, based on the most current guidelines issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) The facility must establish and maintain a comprehensive tuberculosis infection control program according to the most current tuberculosis infection control guidelines issued by the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Division [...]”
Show all 18
- Tag 680: 144G.42 Subd. 10 Disaster planning and emergency preparedness (re-issued) Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop an emergency preparedness plan (EP) with all required content or practice and document testing of its plan at least twice annually as required.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to develop an emergency preparedness plan (EP) with all required content or practice and document testing of its plan at least twice annually as required. This had the potential to affect all six (6) residents, staff and visitors of the facility. [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) The facility must meet the following requirements: (1) have a written emergency disaster plan that contains a plan for evacuation, addresses elements of sheltering in place, identifies temporary relocation sites, and details staff assignments in the event [...]”
- Tag 730: 144G.43 Subd. 3 Contents of resident record (re-issued) Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure documentation of services that have been provided as identified in the care plan for one of two residents (R1).
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure documentation of services that have been provided as identified in the care plan for one of two residents (R1). [...]”
Rule cited: “Contents of a resident record include the following for each resident: (1) identifying information, including the resident's name, date of birth, address, and telephone number; (2) the name, address, and telephone number of the resident's emergency contact, [...]”
- Tag 810: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (b)-(f) Fire protection and physical environment (re-issued) Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to maintain the facility's fire safety and evacuation plan with required elements.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on record review and interview, the licensee failed to maintain the facility's fire safety and evacuation plan with required elements. This had the potential to directly affect all residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”
Rule cited: “(b) Each assisted living facility shall develop and maintain fire safety and evacuation plans. [...]”
- Tag 1370: 144G.61 Subd. 2 (a) Training and evaluation of unlicensed personn (re-issued) Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure training and competency evaluations included all the required training for one of three employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP-G)).
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure training and competency evaluations included all the required training for one of three employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP-G)). [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) Training and competency evaluations for all unlicensed personnel must include the following: (1) documentation requirements for all services provided; (2) reports of changes in the resident's condition to the supervisor designated by the facility; (3) [...]”
- Tag 1380: 144G.61 Subd. 2 (b) Training and evaluation of unlicensed personn (re-issued) Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure training and competency evaluations included all the required training for one of three employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-G).
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure training and competency evaluations included all the required training for one of three employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-G). [...]”
Rule cited: “(b) In addition to paragraph (a), training and competency evaluation for unlicensed personnel providing assisted living services must include: (1) observing, reporting, and documenting resident status; (2) basic knowledge of body functioning and changes in [...]”
- Tag 1420: 144G.62 Subd. 2 Delegation of assisted living services (re-issued) Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) conducted training and competency evaluations for one of one unlicensed personnel (ULP)-G who performed weights.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) conducted training and competency evaluations for one of one unlicensed personnel (ULP)-G who performed weights. [...]”
Rule cited: “(b) When the registered nurse or licensed health professional delegates tasks to unlicensed personnel, that person must ensure that prior to the delegation the unlicensed personnel is trained in the proper methods to perform the tasks or procedures for each [...]”
- Tag 1620: 144G.70 Subd. 2 (c-e) Initial reviews, assessments, and monitoring (re-issued) Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure a registered nurse (RN) completed an assessment of one of one resident's skin (R1).
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure a registered nurse (RN) completed an assessment of one of one resident's skin (R1). This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death), and was issued at an isolated scope (when one or a limited number of residents are affected or one or a [...]”
Rule cited: “(c) Resident reassessment and monitoring must be conducted no more than 14 calendar days after initiation of services. [...]”
- Tag 1650: 144G.70 Subd. 4 (f) Service plan, implementation and revisions to (re-issued) Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the service plans included the required content for two of two residents (R1, R4).
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the service plans included the required content for two of two residents (R1, R4). This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety) and was issued at a widespread scope (when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has affected or has the potential to affect a large portion or all [...]”
Rule cited: “(f) The service plan must include: (1) a description of the services to be provided, the fees for services, and the frequency of each service, according to the resident's current assessment and resident preferences; (2) the identification of staff or [...]”
- Tag 1750: 144G.71 Subd. 7 Delegation of medication administration (re-issued) Level 3, isolated scope, scope/level letter G · correction period: Immediate
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure competence prior to delegating the nursing task of medication administration, for one of three unlicensed personnel (ULP-G) demonstrated competency for administering medications.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure competence prior to delegating the nursing task of medication administration, for one of three unlicensed personnel (ULP-G) demonstrated competency for administering medications. [...]”
Rule cited: “When administration of medications is delegated to unlicensed personnel, the assisted living facility must ensure that the registered nurse has: (1) instructed the unlicensed personnel in the proper methods to administer the medications, and the unlicensed [...]”
- Tag 1760: 144G.71 Subd. 8 Documentation of administration of medication (re-issued) Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D
Details
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review the licensee failed to ensure medications were administered as prescribed for one of two residents (R1). This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death), and was issued at an isolated scope (when one or a limited number of residents are affected or one or a limited [...]”
Rule cited: “Each medication administered by the assisted living facility staff must be documented in the resident's record. The documentation must include the signature and title of the person who administered the medication. [...]”
- Tag 1790: 144G.71 Subd. 10 Medication management for residents who will (re-issued) Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure one of three employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-G), were trained, and demonstrated competency to prepare and give medications for residents having unplanned time away.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure one of three employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-G), were trained, and demonstrated competency to prepare and give medications for residents having unplanned time away. This had the potential to affect all six (6) residents. [...]”
Rule cited: “(2) for unplanned time away, when the pharmacy is not able to provide the medications, a licensed nurse or unlicensed personnel shall provide medications in amounts and dosages needed for the length of the anticipated absence, not to exceed seven calendar [...]”
- Tag 2040: 144G.81 Subdivision 1 Fire protection and physical environment (re-issued) Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide a hazard vulnerability assessment or safety risk assessment of the physical environment on and around the property.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on record review and interview, the licensee failed to provide a hazard vulnerability assessment or safety risk assessment of the physical environment on and around the property. This deficient practice had the ability to affect all staff, residents, and visitors. [...]”
Rule cited: “An assisted living facility with dementia care that has a secured dementia care unit must meet the requirements of section 144G.45 and the following additional requirements: (1) a hazard vulnerability assessment or safety risk must be performed on and around [...]”
- Tag 2170: 144G.84 SERVICES FOR RESIDENTS WITH DEMENTIA (re-issued) Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop an individualized activity plan with required content based on the evaluation, for two of two residents (R1, R4) who received services under an assisted living with dementia care license.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to develop an individualized activity plan with required content based on the evaluation, for two of two residents (R1, R4) who received services under an assisted living with dementia care license. [...]”
Rule cited: “(b) Each resident must be evaluated for activities according to the licensing rules of the facility. [...]”
Survey completed February 5, 2023: 33 correction orders
- Tag 250: 144G.20 Subdivision 1 Conditions (re-issued) scope/level letter F
Details
Rule cited: “(a) The commissioner may refuse to grant a provisional license, refuse to grant a license as a result of a change in ownership, refuse to renew a license, suspend or revoke a license, or impose a conditional license if the owner, controlling individual, or [...]”
- Tag 340: 144G.30 Subd. 5 Correction orders (re-issued) Level 3, widespread scope, scope/level letter I
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to have sufficient documentation with actions taken to comply with immediate order, tag identification 0495 during a survey completed on December 7, 2022.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to have sufficient documentation with actions taken to comply with immediate order, tag identification 0495 during a survey completed on December 7, 2022. [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) A correction order may be issued whenever the commissioner finds upon survey or during a complaint investigation that a facility, a managerial official, or an employee of the facility is not in compliance with this chapter. [...]”
- Tag 430: 144G.40 Subd. 2 Uniform checklist disclosure of services (re-issued) scope/level letter C
Details
Rule cited: “(a) All assisted living facilities must provide to prospective residents: (1) a disclosure of the categories of assisted living licenses available and the category of license held by the facility; (2) a written checklist listing all services permitted under [...]”
- Tag 450: 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Minimum requirements (re-issued) scope/level letter C
Details
Rule cited: “All assisted living facilities shall: (1) distribute to residents the assisted living bill of rights; (2) provide services in a manner that complies with the Nurse Practice Act in sections 148.171 to 148.285; (3) utilize a person-centered planning and service [...]”
- Tag 470: 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Minimum requirements (re-issued) scope/level letter F
Details
Rule cited: “(11) develop and implement a staffing plan for determining its staffing level that: (i) includes an evaluation, to be conducted at least twice a year, of the appropriateness of staffing levels in the facility; (ii) ensures sufficient staffing at all times to [...]”
Show all 33
- Tag 480: 144G.41 Subd 1 (13) (i) (B) Minimum requirements (re-issued) scope/level letter F
Details
Rule cited: “(13) offer to provide or make available at least the following services to residents: (i) at least three nutritious meals daily with snacks available seven days per week, according to the recommended dietary allowances in the United States Department of [...]”
- Tag 495: 144G.41 Subd. 1 (14) Minimum Requirements (re-issued) Level 3, widespread scope, scope/level letter I
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure that a registered nurse (RN) was available on-call 24 hours a day, seven days per week.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure that a registered nurse (RN) was available on-call 24 hours a day, seven days per week. This had the potential to affect all seven (7) residents and staff of the facility. [...]”
Rule cited: “(14) provide staff access to an on-call registered nurse 24 hours per day, seven days per week.”
- Tag 510: 144G.41 Subd. 3 Infection control program (re-issued) scope/level letter F
Details
Rule cited: “(a) All assisted living facilities must establish and maintain an infection control program that complies with accepted health care, medical, and nursing standards for infection control. [...]”
- Tag 580: 144G.42 Subd. 2 Quality management (re-issued) scope/level letter F
Details
Rule cited: “The facility shall engage in quality management appropriate to the size of the facility and relevant to the type of services provided. [...]”
- Tag 630: 144G.42 Subd. 6 (b) Compliance with requirements for reporting ma (re-issued) scope/level letter E
Details
Rule cited: “(b) The facility must develop and implement an individual abuse prevention plan for each vulnerable adult. [...]”
- Tag 650: 144G.42 Subd. 8 Employee records (re-issued) scope/level letter E
Details
Rule cited: “(a) The facility must maintain current records of each paid employee, each regularly scheduled volunteer providing services, and each individual contractor providing services. [...]”
- Tag 660: 144G.42 Subd. 9 Tuberculosis prevention and control (re-issued) scope/level letter F
Details
Rule cited: “(a) The facility must establish and maintain a comprehensive tuberculosis infection control program according to the most current tuberculosis infection control guidelines issued by the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Division [...]”
- Tag 680: 144G.42 Subd. 10 Disaster planning and emergency preparedness (re-issued) scope/level letter F
Details
Rule cited: “(a) The facility must meet the following requirements: (1) have a written emergency disaster plan that contains a plan for evacuation, addresses elements of sheltering in place, identifies temporary relocation sites, and details staff assignments in the event [...]”
- Tag 730: 144G.43 Subd. 3 Contents of resident record (re-issued) scope/level letter E
Details
Rule cited: “Contents of a resident record include the following for each resident: (1) identifying information, including the resident's name, date of birth, address, and telephone number; (2) the name, address, and telephone number of the resident's emergency contact, [...]”
- Tag 790: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (2)-(3) Fire protection and physical environment (re-issued) scope/level letter F
Details
Rule cited: “(2) install and maintain portable fire extinguishers in accordance with the State Fire Code; (3) install portable fire extinguishers having a minimum 2-A:10-B:C rating within Group R-3 occupancies, as defined by the State Fire Code, located so that the travel [...]”
- Tag 800: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (4) Fire protection and physical environment (re-issued) scope/level letter F
Details
Rule cited: “(4) keep the physical environment, including walls, floors, ceiling, all furnishings, grounds, systems, and equipment in a continuous state of good repair and operation with regard to the health, safety, comfort, and well-being of the residents in accordance [...]”
- Tag 810: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (b)-(f) Fire protection and physical environment (re-issued) scope/level letter F
Details
Rule cited: “(b) Each assisted living facility shall develop and maintain fire safety and evacuation plans. [...]”
- Tag 900: 144G.50 Subdivision 1 Contract required (re-issued) scope/level letter E
Details
Rule cited: “(a) An assisted living facility may not offer or provide housing or assisted living services to any individual unless it has executed a written contract with the resident. [...]”
- Tag 1370: 144G.61 Subd. 2 (a) Training and evaluation of unlicensed personn (re-issued) scope/level letter F
Details
Rule cited: “(a) Training and competency evaluations for all unlicensed personnel must include the following: (1) documentation requirements for all services provided; (2) reports of changes in the resident's condition to the supervisor designated by the facility; (3) [...]”
- Tag 1380: 144G.61 Subd. 2 (b) Training and evaluation of unlicensed personn (re-issued) scope/level letter F
Details
Rule cited: “(b) In addition to paragraph (a), training and competency evaluation for unlicensed personnel providing assisted living services must include: (1) observing, reporting, and documenting resident status; (2) basic knowledge of body functioning and changes in [...]”
- Tag 1420: 144G.62 Subd. 2 Delegation of assisted living services (re-issued) scope/level letter D
Details
Rule cited: “(b) When the registered nurse or licensed health professional delegates tasks to unlicensed personnel, that person must ensure that prior to the delegation the unlicensed personnel is trained in the proper methods to perform the tasks or procedures for each [...]”
- Tag 1440: 144G.62 Subd. 4 Supervision of staff providing delegated nurs (re-issued) scope/level letter F
Details
Rule cited: “(a) Staff who perform delegated nursing or therapy tasks must be supervised by an appropriate licensed health professional or a registered nurse according to the assisted living facility's policy where the services are being provided to verify that the work [...]”
- Tag 1620: 144G.70 Subd. 2 (c-e) Initial reviews, assessments, and monitoring (re-issued) scope/level letter E
Details
Rule cited: “(c) Resident reassessment and monitoring must be conducted no more than 14 calendar days after initiation of services. [...]”
- Tag 1650: 144G.70 Subd. 4 (f) Service plan, implementation and revisions to (re-issued) scope/level letter F
Details
Rule cited: “(f) The service plan must include: (1) a description of the services to be provided, the fees for services, and the frequency of each service, according to the resident's current assessment and resident preferences; (2) the identification of staff or [...]”
- Tag 1710: 144G.71 Subd. 3 Individualized medication monitoring and reas (re-issued) scope/level letter E
Details
Rule cited: “The assisted living facility must monitor and reassess the resident's medication management services as needed under subdivision 2 when the resident presents with symptoms or other issues that may be medication-related and, at a minimum, annually.”
- Tag 1750: 144G.71 Subd. 7 Delegation of medication administration (re-issued) scope/level letter H
Details
Rule cited: “When administration of medications is delegated to unlicensed personnel, the assisted living facility must ensure that the registered nurse has: (1) instructed the unlicensed personnel in the proper methods to administer the medications, and the unlicensed [...]”
- Tag 1760: 144G.71 Subd. 8 Documentation of administration of medication (re-issued) scope/level letter D
Details
Rule cited: “Each medication administered by the assisted living facility staff must be documented in the resident's record. The documentation must include the signature and title of the person who administered the medication. [...]”
- Tag 1790: 144G.71 Subd. 10 Medication management for residents who will (re-issued) scope/level letter F
Details
Rule cited: “(2) for unplanned time away, when the pharmacy is not able to provide the medications, a licensed nurse or unlicensed personnel shall provide medications in amounts and dosages needed for the length of the anticipated absence, not to exceed seven calendar [...]”
- Tag 1910: 144G.71 Subd. 22 Disposition of medications (re-issued) scope/level letter D
Details
Rule cited: “(a) Any current medications being managed by the assisted living facility must be provided to the resident when the resident's service plan ends or medication management services are no longer part of the service plan. [...]”
- Tag 2040: 144G.81 Subdivision 1 Fire protection and physical environment (re-issued) scope/level letter F
Details
Rule cited: “An assisted living facility with dementia care that has a secured dementia care unit must meet the requirements of section 144G.45 and the following additional requirements: (1) a hazard vulnerability assessment or safety risk must be performed on and around [...]”
- Tag 2110: 144G.82 Subd. 3 Policies (re-issued) scope/level letter F
Details
Rule cited: “(a) In addition to the policies and procedures required in the licensing of all facilities, the assisted living facility with dementia care licensee must develop and implement policies and procedures that address the: (1) philosophy of how services are [...]”
- Tag 2170: 144G.84 SERVICES FOR RESIDENTS WITH DEMENTIA (re-issued) scope/level letter E
Details
Rule cited: “(b) Each resident must be evaluated for activities according to the licensing rules of the facility. [...]”
- Tag 2410: 144G.91 Subd. 13 Personal and treatment privacy (re-issued) scope/level letter E
Details
Rule cited: “(a) Residents have the right to consideration of their privacy, individuality, and cultural identity as related to their social, religious, and psychological well-being. [...]”
Survey completed December 30, 2022: 36 correction orders
- Tag 110: 144G.10 Subdivision 1a Assisted living director license required (re-issued) scope/level letter I
Details
Rule cited: “Each assisted living facility must employ an assisted living director licensed or permitted by the Board of Executives for Long Term Services and Supports.”
- Tag 250: 144G.20 Subdivision 1 Conditions (re-issued) scope/level letter F
Details
Rule cited: “(a) The commissioner may refuse to grant a provisional license, refuse to grant a license as a result of a change in ownership, refuse to renew a license, suspend or revoke a license, or impose a conditional license if the owner, controlling individual, or [...]”
- Tag 340: 144G.30 Subd. 5 Correction orders (re-issued) Level 3, widespread scope, scope/level letter I
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide sufficient documentation with actions taken to comply with the immediate order tag identifications 0110 and 0495, as well as requirements outlined in the letter of Notice of Conditional License, during monitoring communication completed on December 30, 2022.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to provide sufficient documentation with actions taken to comply with the immediate order tag identifications 0110 and 0495, as well as requirements outlined in the letter of Notice of Conditional License, during monitoring communication completed on December 30, 2022. [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) A correction order may be issued whenever the commissioner finds upon survey or during a complaint investigation that a facility, a managerial official, or an employee of the facility is not in compliance with this chapter. [...]”
- Tag 430: 144G.40 Subd. 2 Uniform checklist disclosure of services (re-issued) scope/level letter C
Details
Rule cited: “(a) All assisted living facilities must provide to prospective residents: (1) a disclosure of the categories of assisted living licenses available and the category of license held by the facility; (2) a written checklist listing all services permitted under [...]”
- Tag 450: 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Minimum requirements (re-issued) scope/level letter C
Details
Rule cited: “All assisted living facilities shall: (1) distribute to residents the assisted living bill of rights; (2) provide services in a manner that complies with the Nurse Practice Act in sections 148.171 to 148.285; (3) utilize a person-centered planning and service [...]”
Show all 36
- Tag 470: 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Minimum requirements (re-issued) scope/level letter F
Details
Rule cited: “(11) develop and implement a staffing plan for determining its staffing level that: (i) includes an evaluation, to be conducted at least twice a year, of the appropriateness of staffing levels in the facility; (ii) ensures sufficient staffing at all times to [...]”
- Tag 480: 144G.41 Subd 1 (13) (i) (B) Minimum requirements (re-issued) scope/level letter F
Details
Rule cited: “(13) offer to provide or make available at least the following services to residents: (i) at least three nutritious meals daily with snacks available seven days per week, according to the recommended dietary allowances in the United States Department of [...]”
- Tag 495: 144G.41 Subd. 1 (14) Minimum Requirements (re-issued) scope/level letter I
Details
Rule cited: “(14) provide staff access to an on-call registered nurse 24 hours per day, seven days per week.”
- Tag 510: 144G.41 Subd. 3 Infection control program (re-issued) scope/level letter F
Details
Rule cited: “(a) All assisted living facilities must establish and maintain an infection control program that complies with accepted health care, medical, and nursing standards for infection control. [...]”
- Tag 580: 144G.42 Subd. 2 Quality management (re-issued) scope/level letter F
Details
Rule cited: “The facility shall engage in quality management appropriate to the size of the facility and relevant to the type of services provided. [...]”
- Tag 630: 144G.42 Subd. 6 (b) Compliance with requirements for reporting ma (re-issued) scope/level letter E
Details
Rule cited: “(b) The facility must develop and implement an individual abuse prevention plan for each vulnerable adult. [...]”
- Tag 650: 144G.42 Subd. 8 Employee records (re-issued) scope/level letter E
Details
Rule cited: “(a) The facility must maintain current records of each paid employee, each regularly scheduled volunteer providing services, and each individual contractor providing services. [...]”
- Tag 660: 144G.42 Subd. 9 Tuberculosis prevention and control (re-issued) scope/level letter F
Details
Rule cited: “(a) The facility must establish and maintain a comprehensive tuberculosis infection control program according to the most current tuberculosis infection control guidelines issued by the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Division [...]”
- Tag 680: 144G.42 Subd. 10 Disaster planning and emergency preparedness (re-issued) scope/level letter F
Details
Rule cited: “(a) The facility must meet the following requirements: (1) have a written emergency disaster plan that contains a plan for evacuation, addresses elements of sheltering in place, identifies temporary relocation sites, and details staff assignments in the event [...]”
- Tag 730: 144G.43 Subd. 3 Contents of resident record (re-issued) scope/level letter E
Details
Rule cited: “Contents of a resident record include the following for each resident: (1) identifying information, including the resident's name, date of birth, address, and telephone number; (2) the name, address, and telephone number of the resident's emergency contact, [...]”
- Tag 790: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (2)-(3) Fire protection and physical environment (re-issued) scope/level letter F
Details
Rule cited: “(2) install and maintain portable fire extinguishers in accordance with the State Fire Code; (3) install portable fire extinguishers having a minimum 2-A:10-B:C rating within Group R-3 occupancies, as defined by the State Fire Code, located so that the travel [...]”
- Tag 800: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (4) Fire protection and physical environment (re-issued) scope/level letter F
Details
Rule cited: “(4) keep the physical environment, including walls, floors, ceiling, all furnishings, grounds, systems, and equipment in a continuous state of good repair and operation with regard to the health, safety, comfort, and well-being of the residents in accordance [...]”
- Tag 810: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (b)-(f) Fire protection and physical environment (re-issued) scope/level letter F
Details
Rule cited: “(b) Each assisted living facility shall develop and maintain fire safety and evacuation plans. [...]”
- Tag 900: 144G.50 Subdivision 1 Contract required (re-issued) scope/level letter E
Details
Rule cited: “(a) An assisted living facility may not offer or provide housing or assisted living services to any individual unless it has executed a written contract with the resident. [...]”
- Tag 1290: 144G.60 Subdivision 1 Background studies required (re-issued) scope/level letter G
Details
Rule cited: “(a) Employees, contractors, and regularly scheduled volunteers of the facility are subject to the background study required by section 144.057 and may be disqualified under chapter 245C. [...]”
- Tag 1370: 144G.61 Subd. 2 (a) Training and evaluation of unlicensed personn (re-issued) scope/level letter F
Details
Rule cited: “(a) Training and competency evaluations for all unlicensed personnel must include the following: (1) documentation requirements for all services provided; (2) reports of changes in the resident's condition to the supervisor designated by the facility; (3) [...]”
- Tag 1380: 144G.61 Subd. 2 (b) Training and evaluation of unlicensed personn (re-issued) scope/level letter F
Details
Rule cited: “(b) In addition to paragraph (a), training and competency evaluation for unlicensed personnel providing assisted living services must include: (1) observing, reporting, and documenting resident status; (2) basic knowledge of body functioning and changes in [...]”
- Tag 1420: 144G.62 Subd. 2 Delegation of assisted living services (re-issued) scope/level letter D
Details
Rule cited: “(b) When the registered nurse or licensed health professional delegates tasks to unlicensed personnel, that person must ensure that prior to the delegation the unlicensed personnel is trained in the proper methods to perform the tasks or procedures for each [...]”
- Tag 1440: 144G.62 Subd. 4 Supervision of staff providing delegated nurs (re-issued) scope/level letter F
Details
Rule cited: “(a) Staff who perform delegated nursing or therapy tasks must be supervised by an appropriate licensed health professional or a registered nurse according to the assisted living facility's policy where the services are being provided to verify that the work [...]”
- Tag 1620: 144G.70 Subd. 2 (c-e) Initial reviews, assessments, and monitoring (re-issued) scope/level letter E
Details
Rule cited: “(c) Resident reassessment and monitoring must be conducted no more than 14 calendar days after initiation of services. [...]”
- Tag 1650: 144G.70 Subd. 4 (f) Service plan, implementation and revisions to (re-issued) scope/level letter F
Details
Rule cited: “(f) The service plan must include: (1) a description of the services to be provided, the fees for services, and the frequency of each service, according to the resident's current assessment and resident preferences; (2) the identification of staff or [...]”
- Tag 1710: 144G.71 Subd. 3 Individualized medication monitoring and reas (re-issued) scope/level letter E
Details
Rule cited: “The assisted living facility must monitor and reassess the resident's medication management services as needed under subdivision 2 when the resident presents with symptoms or other issues that may be medication-related and, at a minimum, annually.”
- Tag 1750: 144G.71 Subd. 7 Delegation of medication administration (re-issued) scope/level letter H
Details
Rule cited: “When administration of medications is delegated to unlicensed personnel, the assisted living facility must ensure that the registered nurse has: (1) instructed the unlicensed personnel in the proper methods to administer the medications, and the unlicensed [...]”
- Tag 1760: 144G.71 Subd. 8 Documentation of administration of medication (re-issued) scope/level letter D
Details
Rule cited: “Each medication administered by the assisted living facility staff must be documented in the resident's record. The documentation must include the signature and title of the person who administered the medication. [...]”
- Tag 1790: 144G.71 Subd. 10 Medication management for residents who will (re-issued) scope/level letter F
Details
Rule cited: “(2) for unplanned time away, when the pharmacy is not able to provide the medications, a licensed nurse or unlicensed personnel shall provide medications in amounts and dosages needed for the length of the anticipated absence, not to exceed seven calendar [...]”
- Tag 1910: 144G.71 Subd. 22 Disposition of medications (re-issued) scope/level letter D
Details
Rule cited: “(a) Any current medications being managed by the assisted living facility must be provided to the resident when the resident's service plan ends or medication management services are no longer part of the service plan. [...]”
- Tag 2040: 144G.81 Subdivision 1 Fire protection and physical environment (re-issued) scope/level letter F
Details
Rule cited: “An assisted living facility with dementia care that has a secured dementia care unit must meet the requirements of section 144G.45 and the following additional requirements: (1) a hazard vulnerability assessment or safety risk must be performed on and around [...]”
- Tag 2070: 144G.81 Subd. 4 Awake staff requirement (re-issued) scope/level letter I
Details
Rule cited: “An assisted living facility with dementia care providing services in a secured dementia care unit must have an awake person who is physically present in the secured dementia care unit 24 hours per day, seven days per week, who is responsible for responding to [...]”
- Tag 2110: 144G.82 Subd. 3 Policies (re-issued) scope/level letter F
Details
Rule cited: “(a) In addition to the policies and procedures required in the licensing of all facilities, the assisted living facility with dementia care licensee must develop and implement policies and procedures that address the: (1) philosophy of how services are [...]”
- Tag 2170: 144G.84 SERVICES FOR RESIDENTS WITH DEMENTIA (re-issued) scope/level letter E
Details
Rule cited: “(b) Each resident must be evaluated for activities according to the licensing rules of the facility. [...]”
- Tag 2410: 144G.91 Subd. 13 Personal and treatment privacy (re-issued) scope/level letter E
Details
Rule cited: “(a) Residents have the right to consideration of their privacy, individuality, and cultural identity as related to their social, religious, and psychological well-being. [...]”
Survey completed December 7, 2022: 36 correction orders
- Tag 110: 144G.10 Subdivision 1a Assisted living director license required Level 3, widespread scope, scope/level letter I
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the licensee had a licensed assisted living director (LALD).
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the licensee had a licensed assisted living director (LALD). This had the potential to affect all the licensee's residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”
Rule cited: “Each assisted living facility must employ an assisted living director licensed or permitted by the Board of Executives for Long Term Services and Supports.”
- Tag 250: 144G.20 Subdivision 1 Conditions Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to show they met the requirements of licensure, by attesting the managerial officials who oversaw the day-to-day operations understood applicable statutes and rules; nor developed and/or implemented current policies and procedures as required with records
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to show they met the requirements of licensure, by attesting the managerial officials who oversaw the day-to-day operations understood applicable statutes and rules; nor developed and/or implemented current policies and procedures as required with records reviewed. This had the potential to affect all residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) The commissioner may refuse to grant a provisional license, refuse to grant a license as a result of a change in ownership, refuse to renew a license, suspend or revoke a license, or impose a conditional license if the owner, controlling individual, or [...]”
- Tag 340: 144G.30 Subd. 5 Correction orders Level 3, widespread scope, scope/level letter I · correction period: Seven (7) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to have sufficient documentation with actions taken to comply with the immediate order, tag identification 0110, 0495, 1290, 1750, and 2070, during a survey completed on December 7, 2022.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to have sufficient documentation with actions taken to comply with the immediate order, tag identification 0110, 0495, 1290, 1750, and 2070, during a survey completed on December 7, 2022. [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) A correction order may be issued whenever the commissioner finds upon survey or during a complaint investigation that a facility, a managerial official, or an employee of the facility is not in compliance with this chapter. [...]”
- Tag 430: 144G.40 Subd. 2 Uniform checklist disclosure of services Level 1, widespread scope, scope/level letter C · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide a copy of the uniform checklist disclosure of services (UDALSA) with the required content for two of two residents (R1, R2).
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to provide a copy of the uniform checklist disclosure of services (UDALSA) with the required content for two of two residents (R1, R2). [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) All assisted living facilities must provide to prospective residents: (1) a disclosure of the categories of assisted living licenses available and the category of license held by the facility; (2) a written checklist listing all services permitted under [...]”
- Tag 450: 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Minimum requirements Level 1, widespread scope, scope/level letter C · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide the current bill of rights for assisted living to two of two residents (R1, R2) with records reviewed.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to provide the current bill of rights for assisted living to two of two residents (R1, R2) with records reviewed. [...]”
Rule cited: “All assisted living facilities shall: (1) distribute to residents the assisted living bill of rights; (2) provide services in a manner that complies with the Nurse Practice Act in sections 148.171 to 148.285; (3) utilize a person-centered planning and service [...]”
Show all 36
- Tag 470: 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Minimum requirements Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the staffing plan was developed and posted as required, potentially affecting all seven (7) residents in the assisted living with dementia care facility, staff and any visitors of the licensee.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the staffing plan was developed and posted as required, potentially affecting all seven (7) residents in the assisted living with dementia care facility, staff and any visitors of the licensee. [...]”
Rule cited: “(11) develop and implement a staffing plan for determining its staffing level that: (i) includes an evaluation, to be conducted at least twice a year, of the appropriateness of staffing levels in the facility; (ii) ensures sufficient staffing at all times to [...]”
- Tag 480: 144G.41 Subd 1 (13) (i) (B) Minimum requirements Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared according to the Minnesota Food Code.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared according to the Minnesota Food Code. This had the potential to affect all 7 residents. [...]”
Rule cited: “(13) offer to provide or make available at least the following services to residents: (i) at least three nutritious meals daily with snacks available seven days per week, according to the recommended dietary allowances in the United States Department of [...]”
- Tag 495: 144G.41 Subd. 1 (14) Minimum Requirements Level 3, widespread scope, scope/level letter I
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure that a registered nurse (RN) was available on-call 24 hours a day, seven days per week.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to ensure that a registered nurse (RN) was available on-call 24 hours a day, seven days per week. This had the potential to affect all seven (7) residents and staff of the facility. [...]”
Rule cited: “(14) provide staff access to an on-call registered nurse 24 hours per day, seven days per week.”
- Tag 510: 144G.41 Subd. 3 Infection control program Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to establish and maintain an effective infection control program to comply with accepted health care, medical, and nursing standards for infection control and current recommendations for COVID-19 regarding wearing appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE).
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to establish and maintain an effective infection control program to comply with accepted health care, medical, and nursing standards for infection control and current recommendations for COVID-19 regarding wearing appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE). In addition, the licensee failed to ensure reusable equipment was cleaned in-between resident use. [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) All assisted living facilities must establish and maintain an infection control program that complies with accepted health care, medical, and nursing standards for infection control. [...]”
- Tag 580: 144G.42 Subd. 2 Quality management Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to engage in and maintain documentation of quality management activity.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to engage in and maintain documentation of quality management activity. This had the potential to affect all seven (7) residents receiving assisted living services. [...]”
Rule cited: “The facility shall engage in quality management appropriate to the size of the facility and relevant to the type of services provided. [...]”
- Tag 630: 144G.42 Subd. 6 (b) Compliance with requirements for reporting ma Level 2, pattern scope, scope/level letter E · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure an individual abuse prevention plan was developed to include the required content for two of two residents (R1, R2).
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure an individual abuse prevention plan was developed to include the required content for two of two residents (R1, R2). [...]”
Rule cited: “(b) The facility must develop and implement an individual abuse prevention plan for each vulnerable adult. [...]”
- Tag 650: 144G.42 Subd. 8 Employee records Level 2, pattern scope, scope/level letter E · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure two of three employee records (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-G, ULP-H) included a job description.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure two of three employee records (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-G, ULP-H) included a job description. In addition, the licensee failed to ensure one of one employee records (ULP)-I contained a job description that included the identification of the staff person providing supervision. [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) The facility must maintain current records of each paid employee, each regularly scheduled volunteer providing services, and each individual contractor providing services. [...]”
- Tag 660: 144G.42 Subd. 9 Tuberculosis prevention and control Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to maintain a tuberculosis (TB) prevention and control program, based on the most current guidelines issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) The facility must establish and maintain a comprehensive tuberculosis infection control program according to the most current tuberculosis infection control guidelines issued by the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Division [...]”
- Tag 680: 144G.42 Subd. 10 Disaster planning and emergency preparedness Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to have a written emergency disaster plan with all required content and failed to post an emergency plan prominently.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to have a written emergency disaster plan with all required content and failed to post an emergency plan prominently. This had the potential to affect all residents, staff and visitors. [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) The facility must meet the following requirements: (1) have a written emergency disaster plan that contains a plan for evacuation, addresses elements of sheltering in place, identifies temporary relocation sites, and details staff assignments in the event [...]”
- Tag 730: 144G.43 Subd. 3 Contents of resident record Level 2, pattern scope, scope/level letter E · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the resident record contained documentation of the services being provided for two of two residents (R1 and R2) and failed to ensure documentation of significant changes in the resident's status and actions taken in response to the needs of the resident for two of two residents (R1 and R2).
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the resident record contained documentation of the services being provided for two of two residents (R1 and R2) and failed to ensure documentation of significant changes in the resident's status and actions taken in response to the needs of the resident for two of two residents (R1 and R2). [...]”
Rule cited: “Contents of a resident record include the following for each resident: (1) identifying information, including the resident's name, date of birth, address, and telephone number; (2) the name, address, and telephone number of the resident's emergency contact, [...]”
- Tag 790: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (2)-(3) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide portable fire extinguishers that were readily accessible to all occupants within the facility.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to provide portable fire extinguishers that were readily accessible to all occupants within the facility. This had the potential to directly affect all residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”
Rule cited: “(2) install and maintain portable fire extinguishers in accordance with the State Fire Code; (3) install portable fire extinguishers having a minimum 2-A:10-B:C rating within Group R-3 occupancies, as defined by the State Fire Code, located so that the travel [...]”
- Tag 800: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (4) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to maintain the facility physical environment in a continuous state of good repair and operation regarding the health, safety, and well-being of the residents.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to maintain the facility physical environment in a continuous state of good repair and operation regarding the health, safety, and well-being of the residents. This had the potential to directly affect all residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”
Rule cited: “(4) keep the physical environment, including walls, floors, ceiling, all furnishings, grounds, systems, and equipment in a continuous state of good repair and operation with regard to the health, safety, comfort, and well-being of the residents in accordance [...]”
- Tag 810: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (b)-(f) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one
Details
MDH’s finding, as written: “Records were requested and an interview was conducted on December 5, 2022, at approximately 12:15 p.m. of Community Coordinator (CC)-A and Activities Director (A)-B on the fire safety and evacuation plan, fire safety and evacuation training, and evacuation drills for the facility. [...]”
Rule cited: “(b) Each assisted living facility shall develop and maintain fire safety and evacuation plans. [...]”
- Tag 900: 144G.50 Subdivision 1 Contract required Level 2, pattern scope, scope/level letter E · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop and execute a written assisted living contract with the required content for two of two residents (R1, R2).
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to develop and execute a written assisted living contract with the required content for two of two residents (R1, R2). [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) An assisted living facility may not offer or provide housing or assisted living services to any individual unless it has executed a written contract with the resident. [...]”
- Tag 1290: 144G.60 Subdivision 1 Background studies required Level 3, isolated scope, scope/level letter G · correction period: Immediate
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to affiliate background studies to the facility license for one of four staff, unlicensed personnel (ULP)-H.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to affiliate background studies to the facility license for one of four staff, unlicensed personnel (ULP)-H. This practice resulted in a level three violation (a violation that harmed a resident's health or safety, not including serious injury, impairment, or death, or a violation that has the potential to lead to serious injury, impairment, or death) and was issued at an isolated scope (when one or a limited number of residents are [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) Employees, contractors, and regularly scheduled volunteers of the facility are subject to the background study required by section 144.057 and may be disqualified under chapter 245C. [...]”
- Tag 1370: 144G.61 Subd. 2 (a) Training and evaluation of unlicensed personn Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure training and competency evaluations included all the required training for three of three employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-G, ULP-H, ULP-I).
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure training and competency evaluations included all the required training for three of three employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-G, ULP-H, ULP-I). [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) Training and competency evaluations for all unlicensed personnel must include the following: (1) documentation requirements for all services provided; (2) reports of changes in the resident's condition to the supervisor designated by the facility; (3) [...]”
- Tag 1380: 144G.61 Subd. 2 (b) Training and evaluation of unlicensed personn Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure training and competency evaluations included all the required training for three of three employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-G, ULP-H, ULP-I).
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure training and competency evaluations included all the required training for three of three employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-G, ULP-H, ULP-I). [...]”
Rule cited: “(b) In addition to paragraph (a), training and competency evaluation for unlicensed personnel providing assisted living services must include: (1) observing, reporting, and documenting resident status; (2) basic knowledge of body functioning and changes in [...]”
- Tag 1420: 144G.62 Subd. 2 Delegation of assisted living services Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) conducted training and competency evaluations for one of one unlicensed personnel (ULP)-G who performed blood pressure monitoring, oxygen saturation monitoring, and weights. [...]”
Rule cited: “(b) When the registered nurse or licensed health professional delegates tasks to unlicensed personnel, that person must ensure that prior to the delegation the unlicensed personnel is trained in the proper methods to perform the tasks or procedures for each [...]”
- Tag 1440: 144G.62 Subd. 4 Supervision of staff providing delegated nurs Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure direct supervision of unlicensed personnel (ULP) performing delegated tasks was completed for three of three employees (ULP-G, ULP-H, ULP-I).
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure direct supervision of unlicensed personnel (ULP) performing delegated tasks was completed for three of three employees (ULP-G, ULP-H, ULP-I). [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) Staff who perform delegated nursing or therapy tasks must be supervised by an appropriate licensed health professional or a registered nurse according to the assisted living facility's policy where the services are being provided to verify that the work [...]”
- Tag 1620: 144G.70 Subd. 2 (c-e) Initial reviews, assessments, and monitoring Level 2, pattern scope, scope/level letter E · correction period: Seven (7) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) completed a comprehensive reassessment after a fall for two of two residents (R1, R2), and failed to ensure the ongoing resident reassessment did not exceed 90 days for two of two residents (R1, R2).
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) completed a comprehensive reassessment after a fall for two of two residents (R1, R2), and failed to ensure the ongoing resident reassessment did not exceed 90 days for two of two residents (R1, R2). In addition, the licensee failed to ensure the RN used the uniform assessment tool when completing the two of two residents (R1, R2) assessments. [...]”
Rule cited: “(c) Resident reassessment and monitoring must be conducted no more than 14 calendar days after initiation of services. [...]”
- Tag 1650: 144G.70 Subd. 4 (f) Service plan, implementation and revisions to Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the service plans included the required content for two of two residents (R1, R2).
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the service plans included the required content for two of two residents (R1, R2). This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety) and was issued at a widespread scope (when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has affected or has the potential to affect a large [...]”
Rule cited: “(f) The service plan must include: (1) a description of the services to be provided, the fees for services, and the frequency of each service, according to the resident's current assessment and resident preferences; (2) the identification of staff or [...]”
- Tag 1710: 144G.71 Subd. 3 Individualized medication monitoring and reas Level 2, pattern scope, scope/level letter E · correction period: Seven (7) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) conducted a face-to-face medication management reassessment to include all required content for two of two residents (R1, R2) who received medication management services.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) conducted a face-to-face medication management reassessment to include all required content for two of two residents (R1, R2) who received medication management services. [...]”
Rule cited: “The assisted living facility must monitor and reassess the resident's medication management services as needed under subdivision 2 when the resident presents with symptoms or other issues that may be medication-related and, at a minimum, annually.”
- Tag 1750: 144G.71 Subd. 7 Delegation of medication administration Level 3, pattern scope, scope/level letter H · correction period: Immediate
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure competence prior to delegating the nursing task of medication administration, for three of three unlicensed
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure competence prior to delegating the nursing task of medication administration, for three of three unlicensed personnel (ULP-G, ULP-H, ULP-I) demonstrated competency for administering medications. [...]”
Rule cited: “When administration of medications is delegated to unlicensed personnel, the assisted living facility must ensure that the registered nurse has: (1) instructed the unlicensed personnel in the proper methods to administer the medications, and the unlicensed [...]”
- Tag 1760: 144G.71 Subd. 8 Documentation of administration of medication Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure medications were administered as prescribed for one of two residents (R1).
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure medications were administered as prescribed for one of two residents (R1). This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death), and was issued at an isolated scope (when one or a limited number of residents are affected or one or a limited [...]”
Rule cited: “Each medication administered by the assisted living facility staff must be documented in the resident's record. The documentation must include the signature and title of the person who administered the medication. [...]”
- Tag 1790: 144G.71 Subd. 10 Medication management for residents who will Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7)
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure three of
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure three of three employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-G, ULP-H, ULP-I) were trained and had demonstrated competency to prepare and give medications for residents having unplanned time away. This had the potential to affect all seven (7) residents. [...]”
Rule cited: “(2) for unplanned time away, when the pharmacy is not able to provide the medications, a licensed nurse or unlicensed personnel shall provide medications in amounts and dosages needed for the length of the anticipated absence, not to exceed seven calendar [...]”
- Tag 1910: 144G.71 Subd. 22 Disposition of medications Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to document in the resident's record the disposition of the medications as required for one of one resident (R1) upon discharge.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to document in the resident's record the disposition of the medications as required for one of one resident (R1) upon discharge. [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) Any current medications being managed by the assisted living facility must be provided to the resident when the resident's service plan ends or medication management services are no longer part of the service plan. [...]”
- Tag 2040: 144G.81 Subdivision 1 Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee provided a hazard vulnerability assessment or safety risk assessment of the physical environment on and around the property for the facility but the plan did not include mitigation factors.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on available record review and interview, the licensee provided a hazard vulnerability assessment or safety risk assessment of the physical environment on and around the property for the facility but the plan did not include mitigation factors. This deficient practice had the ability to affect all staff, residents, and visitors. [...]”
Rule cited: “An assisted living facility with dementia care that has a secured dementia care unit must meet the requirements of section 144G.45 and the following additional requirements: (1) a hazard vulnerability assessment or safety risk must be performed on and around [...]”
- Tag 2070: 144G.81 Subd. 4 Awake staff requirement Level 3, widespread scope, scope/level letter I · correction period: Immediate
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure one or more persons were physically present and available 24 hours a day, seven days a week, who were responsible for responding to requests for assistance with health and safety needs of residents in secured dementia care unit.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure one or more persons were physically present and available 24 hours a day, seven days a week, who were responsible for responding to requests for assistance with health and safety needs of residents in secured dementia care unit. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. [...]”
Rule cited: “An assisted living facility with dementia care providing services in a secured dementia care unit must have an awake person who is physically present in the secured dementia care unit 24 hours per day, seven days per week, who is responsible for responding to [...]”
- Tag 2110: 144G.82 Subd. 3 Policies Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure policies and procedures required in the licensing of assisted living facilities with dementia care were developed or implemented, and provided to each resident and/or the residents legal and designated representative at the time of move-in.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure policies and procedures required in the licensing of assisted living facilities with dementia care were developed or implemented, and provided to each resident and/or the residents legal and designated representative at the time of move-in. This had the potential to affect all dementia care residents, staff and visitors. [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) In addition to the policies and procedures required in the licensing of all facilities, the assisted living facility with dementia care licensee must develop and implement policies and procedures that address the: (1) philosophy of how services are [...]”
- Tag 2170: 144G.84 SERVICES FOR RESIDENTS WITH DEMENTIA Level 2, pattern scope, scope/level letter E · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to have a comprehensive evaluation for an activity plan for two of two residents (R1, R2) who received services under an assisted living with dementia care license.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to have a comprehensive evaluation for an activity plan for two of two residents (R1, R2) who received services under an assisted living with dementia care license. [...]”
Rule cited: “(b) Each resident must be evaluated for activities according to the licensing rules of the facility. [...]”
- Tag 2410: 144G.91 Subd. 13 Personal and treatment privacy Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter E · correction period: Seven (7) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure privacy was maintained during resident COVID-19 screening, weights, and blood pressure monitoring for two of five residents (R5, R1).
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to ensure privacy was maintained during resident COVID-19 screening, weights, and blood pressure monitoring for two of five residents (R5, R1). [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) Residents have the right to consideration of their privacy, individuality, and cultural identity as related to their social, religious, and psychological well-being. [...]”
MDH letters in this report
- May 18, 2023: Notice Of Removal Of Conditional License
- March 20, 2023: Notice Of Extended Conditional License And Survey Results
- December 20, 2022: Notice Of Conditional License
From MDH’s letter: the letter says the facility is not in substantial compliance.
Total fines assessed, as printed in the letter: $500.00.
Total fines assessed, as printed in the letter: $6,000.00.
Total fines assessed, as printed in the letter: $18,500.00.
- Tag 680: 144G.42 Subd. 10 Disaster planning and emergency preparedness (re-issued) Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F
Substantiated investigations (state reports)
- October 27, 2023 · report HL304959338C
Details
Survey completed October 4, 2023: 3 correction orders
- Tag 750: 144G.43 Subd. 5 Record retention Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to retain discharged resident records for one of one residents (R1) reviewed.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to retain discharged resident records for one of one residents (R1) reviewed. This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death), and was issued at an isolated scope (when one or a limited number of residents are affected or one or a limited number [...]”
Rule cited: “Following the resident's discharge or termination of services, an assisted living facility must retain a resident's record for at least five years or as otherwise required by state or federal regulations. [...]”
- Tag 990: 144G.52 Subd. 2 Prerequisite to termination of a contract Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to conduct a prerequisite to termination of contract meeting with the resident and the resident's representative prior to discharge of one of one residents (R1) reviewed.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to conduct a prerequisite to termination of contract meeting with the resident and the resident's representative prior to discharge of one of one residents (R1) reviewed. [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) Before issuing a notice of termination of an assisted living contract, a facility must schedule and participate in a meeting with the resident and the resident's legal representative and designated representative. [...]”
- Tag 1170: 144G.56 Subd. 3 Notice required Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide a 30-day advance written notice to the resident, the resident's representative, the Office of Ombudsman for Long-Term Care, or the Office of the Ombudsman for Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities prior to initiating the termination of services and transfer of one of one resident (R1) discharged.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to provide a 30-day advance written notice to the resident, the resident's representative, the Office of Ombudsman for Long-Term Care, or the Office of the Ombudsman for Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities prior to initiating the termination of services and transfer of one of one resident (R1) discharged. [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) A facility must provide at least 30 calendar days' advance written notice to the resident and the resident's legal and designated representative of a facility-initiated transfer. [...]”
- Tag 750: 144G.43 Subd. 5 Record retention Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D
- March 13, 2023 · report HL304955691C
Details
Survey completed December 7, 2022: 2 correction orders
- Tag 495: 144G.41 Subd. 1 (14) Minimum Requirements Level 3, widespread scope, scope/level letter I
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure that a registered nurse (RN) was available on-call 24 hours a day, seven days per week.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to ensure that a registered nurse (RN) was available on-call 24 hours a day, seven days per week. This had the potential to affect all seven (7) residents and staff of the facility. [...]”
Rule cited: “(14) provide staff access to an on-call registered nurse 24 hours per day, seven days per week”
- Tag 1760: 144G.71 Subd. 8 Documentation of administration of medication Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure medications were administered as prescribed for one of two residents (R1).
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure medications were administered as prescribed for one of two residents (R1). This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death), and was issued at an isolated scope (when one or a limited number of residents are affected or one or a limited [...]”
Rule cited: “Each medication administered by the assisted living facility staff must be documented in the resident's record. The documentation must include the signature and title of the person who administered the medication. [...]”
- Tag 495: 144G.41 Subd. 1 (14) Minimum Requirements Level 3, widespread scope, scope/level letter I
Unsubstantiated investigations (1)
- March 19, 2026 · report HL304958642M · MDH finding: Not Substantiated
Details
Allegation, as written: “The facility neglected the resident when interventions were not followed, and the resident fell.”
“The Minnesota Department of Health determined neglect was not substantiated.”
Summary: MDH looked into an allegation and found: neglect not substantiated.
MDH’s conclusion, as written: “The Minnesota Department of Health determined neglect was not substantiated. Although the resident had recurrent falls, the facility staff was following the plan of care. After the falls, a meeting was held, including family members and the medical provider, where the service plan was reviewed and updated.”
Action taken by facility: “Added interventions, worked with family members and medical provider changing medications and monitoring behaviors for a positive effect for resident.”
Action taken by MDH: “No further action is taken at this time.”
Survey completed January 28, 2026: no correction orders issued.
What the levels and scopes mean (MDH’s words)
Level 1: “a violation that has no potential to cause more than a minimal impact on the resident and does not affect health or safety”
Level 2: “a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death”
Level 3: “a violation that harmed a resident's health or safety, not including serious injury, impairment, or death, or a violation that has the potential to lead to serious injury, impairment, or death”
Isolated scope: “when one or a limited number of residents are affected or one or a limited number of staff are involved, or the situation has occurred only occasionally”
Pattern scope: “when more than a limited number of residents are affected, more than a limited number of staff are involved, or the situation has occurred repeatedly; but is not found to be pervasive”
Widespread scope: “when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has affected or has the potential to affect a large portion or all of the residents”
Summaries are ours and are marked “Summary”; quoted text is MDH’s own, shortened where marked [...]. Read the full reports at the links above or search every report on MDH’s site.
What these terms mean
MDH: “An evaluation is a process regulated by the division to ensure licensees comply with the laws, rules, and certifications for the type of care and services authorized under their license/certification.”
“An investigation may occur when the division is notified that care and services are not being provided by licensees as required by law. This may include allegations of abuse, neglect, or financial misuse.”
For maltreatment, Minnesota law defines substantiated as “a preponderance of the evidence shows that an act that meets the definition of maltreatment occurred” and inconclusive as “less than a preponderance of evidence to show that maltreatment did or did not occur” (Minn. Stat. 626.5572).
Correction orders, as MDH explains on each state form: “Tag numbers have been assigned to Minnesota State Statutes for Assisted Living Facilities.” “The letter in the left column is used for tracking purposes and reflects the scope and level issued pursuant to 144G.31 subd. 1, 2, and 3.” MDH adds that there is no requirement to submit a plan of correction for violations of Minnesota state statutes.
MDH keeps investigation results for seven years when allegations are substantiated, four years when inconclusive, and three years when unsubstantiated, so the counts cover different periods. This community is licensed for 11 residents; larger communities are evaluated and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division, data as of September 28, 2026. Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.
License and ownershipActive license, licensee VITACARE LIVING
- License type
- Assisted Living Facility Dementia Care
- License number
- 425715
- License status
- Active
- Current license dated
- 2026-05-01
- Licensed capacity
- 11
- Licensee
- VITACARE LIVING
- County
- Saint Louis County
- Administrator/Authorized Agent
- Tawni Huffman
Source: Minnesota state licensing records (agency listing), retrieved 2026-09-09. Licensing status is a matter of public record; it is not a quality rating.
Administrator/Authorized Agent name from the Minnesota licensing record, as of Sep 9, 2026.
Paying with Medicaid and other programsHow Medicaid pays for care in Minnesota, and other programs
How Medicaid pays for care in Minnesota
- Elderly Waiver (EW), customized living services. Minnesota's Elderly Waiver, part of Medical Assistance (Minnesota Medicaid), can pay for "customized living" services, and a provider of those services must hold an assisted living license (or meet certain exceptions). You must qualify for Medical Assistance and need a nursing-home level of care. (state page)
Ask the community whether it accepts Medicaid.
Location and nearby careNearest hospital 4.1 mi, nursing home 1.4 mi, pharmacy 1.0 mi
- Nearest hospital with an emergency room
- St Marys Hospital Superior, Superior. 4.1 miles away, straight line.
- Nearest Medicare nursing home
- The North Shore Estates LLC, Duluth. 1.4 miles away, straight line.
- Nearest home health agency office
- Aveanna Home Health, Duluth. 0.9 miles away, straight line. Agencies travel to clients, so ask which ones serve this address.
- Nearest pharmacy
- Walgreens. 1.0 mile away, straight line. From OpenStreetMap, which does not list every pharmacy, so one may be closer.
- Area
- USDA classes ZIP code 55807 as metropolitan (metropolitan core).
- Dialysis within 15 miles
- Fmc Dialysis Services Of Spirit Valley, Duluth, 0.8 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 3 of 5 stars)
Fresenius Kidney Care Miller Hill, Hermantown, 7.5 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 3 of 5 stars)
Fresenius Medical Care - Cloquet, Cloquet, 13.8 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 2 of 5 stars) - Hospice
- 9 Medicare hospices tell CMS they serve ZIP code 55807.
Caringedge Hospice Hermantown, office in Hermantown, 5.2 miles away, straight line
Essentia Health St Mary'S Hospice & Palliative Care Services, office in Duluth, 5.3 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 4 of 5 stars)
Aspirus St. Luke'S At Home-Hospice-Duluth, office in Duluth, 5.8 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 4 of 5 stars) - Nearest geriatric medicine practice
- St Marys Hospital Of Superior, Superior. 4.1 miles away, straight line. 4 geriatric medicine doctors listed there.
Distances are straight lines from the community, not driving distance. Hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors come from CMS provider data (CMS, hospital list updated Jul 22, 2026). Star ratings are CMS’s own.
Emergency and natural hazard riskFEMA overall risk very low; outside FEMA's high-risk flood areas
Public hazard maps for this location. Ask the community about its emergency plan, its generator and where residents would go in an evacuation.
- Flood zone
- Outside the high and moderate risk flood areas on FEMA's flood map (Zone X, minimal flood hazard, or not studied). (FEMA flood map)
- FEMA National Risk Index
- Overall: very low. By hazard: inland flooding relatively low, coastal flooding very low, wildfire very low, tornado relatively low. These are FEMA’s ratings for the census tract, compared with tracts nationwide. (FEMA, December 2025)
A flood zone describes the map at this point, not the building's elevation. In an emergency, follow the local emergency management agency.
Questions to ask on a tour10 questions picked for this community from its record
Picked for this community from its record. Ask them in person and write down the answers.
- The current license dates from 2026. Has the owner or operator changed recently?
- What does the base rate include, and when did rates last go up?
- How many caregivers work in memory care during the day, the evening and overnight, and for how many residents?
- What dementia training does each caregiver get before working alone, and every year after?
- How do staff respond when a resident is agitated, frightened or tries to leave?
- How many caregivers are on duty during the day and at night?
- What happens if care needs increase? When would someone need to move?
- What fees are charged at move-in?
- How do you tell families about falls, illness or changes?
- How long have the executive director and the head of care been here?
What we checked11 public sources we searched, with dates
Every public source we searched for this community. “Nothing on record” means we found no record that matched it. A record can be missed when a name or address differs.
| Source | Data as of | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division inspection records | Sep 28, 2026 | See above |
| U.S. Department of Labor wage and hour cases | Oct 15, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| OSHA workplace safety inspections since 2016 | Oct 15, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| FEMA flood map | See above | |
| USDA wildfire risk | Apr 15, 2026 | Not shown: FEMA rates wildfire risk here very low |
| FEMA National Risk Index | See above | |
| CMS hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors; OpenStreetMap pharmacies | See above | |
| HUD Multifamily Properties - Assisted | Jul 6, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| State Veterans Homes (NASVH directory) | Sep 20, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| CMS Hospice - General Information | Aug 19, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| CMS Home Health Care Agencies | May 27, 2026 | Nothing on record |
Common questionsAnswers to 4 questions families ask
What type of care does Vitacare Living, 102 North 58th Avenue West provide?
Vitacare Living, 102 North 58th Avenue West is licensed by the state of Minnesota for assisted living, memory care in Duluth, Minnesota. Its licensed capacity is 11 residents.
Does Lilisity rate Vitacare Living, 102 North 58th Avenue West?
No. We publish state licensing details for Vitacare Living, 102 North 58th Avenue West but no score, rating, or ranking. Only communities on the Top Communities list or with a Senior Living Alliance Excellence Award, both based on phone-verified resident and family interviews, are ranked.
How much does Vitacare Living, 102 North 58th Avenue West cost?
Assisted Living in Minnesota typically starts at $2,200 to $4,800 a month. Based on 74 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price. Vitacare Living, 102 North 58th Avenue West does not publish its prices.
How do I contact Vitacare Living, 102 North 58th Avenue West?
Visit Vitacare Living, 102 North 58th Avenue West at 102 North 58th Avenue West, Duluth, MN 55807.
How Lilisity works. The only scores or rankings Lilisity publishes are the Top Communities list and the Excellence Awards, both built from phone-verified resident and family interviews. Communities can pay Lilisity a flat monthly fee to manage their own listing: photos, prices, contact details, and receiving the inquiries families choose to send them. The fee is the same no matter how many families contact them or move in. Senior Living Alliance, which runs Lilisity, offers the same listing to its member communities as part of their membership; members pay SLA for its resident and family interview program. No community pays Lilisity per inquiry, per referral or per move-in. Payment never changes a testimonial, a rating, or the order of search results. The "Nearby Senior Living Alliance communities" box shows member communities only. How we verify testimonials · How we are paid