Assisted Living
Valora Senior Living of St. Anthony
2540 Kenzie Terrace, St. Anthony, MN 55418 · Map
Licensed for 97 residents · VALORA LLC
Valora Senior Living of St. Anthony is a state-licensed assisted living community in St. Anthony, Minnesota. It is licensed for 97 residents. Lilisity publishes no score or ranking for this community; the details below come from the state licensing record.
Prices
This community does not publish its prices.
Area costs
Care and services
From the community’s website
What Valora Senior Living of St. Anthony says about itself, quoted from its own site. We have not checked these claims against licensing records. Ask about each one on a tour.
- Provides transportation.
Personalized Transportation Services
(page, checked Oct 15, 2026) - Pets allowed.
Valora welcomes pets, so your furry friends can enjoy retirement life right alongside you.
(page, checked Oct 15, 2026) - Apartment types named: studio, two-bedroom.
Spacious Studio, One, and Two Bedroom Apartment Homes
(page, checked Oct 15, 2026) - Smoke-free.
Smoke-Free Living
(page, checked Oct 15, 2026)
Lilisity’s independent report
What the public record shows
Gathered by Lilisity from state and federal sources. Communities can’t edit this part of the page.
License
Active, 97 residents
Assisted Living Facility 425440, current license dated May 29, 2026. Licensee VALORA LLC.
Nearest emergency room
3.4 miles
M Health Fairview University Of Mn Medical Center, rated 4 of 5 stars by CMS.
Side by side with nearby communities
The 4 nearest communities that offer assisted living, by straight-line distance. Prices are starting prices each community publishes; we never show estimates.
| Community | Distance | Licensed capacity | Published starting price | License | Inspection citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Valora Senior Living of St. Anthony this community | 97 | Not published | Active | 3 substantiated | |
| Hayden Grove of St Anthony | 0.1 mi | 155 | Not published | Active | 1 substantiated |
| Golden Nest | 0.6 mi | 24 | Not published | Active | 1 substantiated |
| Everbright Care Homes | 0.8 mi | 5 | Not published | Active | No record |
| Healthguard Partners | 0.9 mi | 4 | Not published | Active | 0 substantiated |
State inspection record3 substantiated
- Last evaluation
- February 25, 2026
- Evaluations on record
- 2
- Investigations substantiated
- 3 kept 7 years
- Inconclusive
- 1 kept 4 years
- Unsubstantiated
- 1 kept 3 years
Most recent evaluation (February 25, 2026, state report 189U11)
MDH: “On February 23, 2026, through February 25, 2026, the Minnesota Department of Health conducted a full survey at the above provider and the following correction orders are issued.”
Survey completed February 25, 2026: 7 correction orders
- Tag 100: 144G.10 Subdivision 1 License required Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to manage, control, and/or operate the entire building as an assisted living facility when a third-party therapy company occupied and provided therapy services within the licensee's building.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to manage, control, and/or operate the entire building as an assisted living facility when a third-party therapy company occupied and provided therapy services within the licensee's building. [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) (1) Beginning August 1, 2021, no assisted living facility may operate in Minnesota unless it is licensed under this chapter. [...]”
- Tag 480: 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Subd. 1a (a-b) Minimum requirements; required food services Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Please refer to the FBEIR for any compliance dates
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code. This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death), and is issued at a widespread scope (when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b), food must be prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code, Minnesota Rules, chapter 4626. [...]”
- Tag 510: 144G.41 Subd. 3 Infection control program Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to establish and maintain an effective infection control program that complied with accepted health care, medical, and nursing standards for infection control related to gloving for one of two employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-B).
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to establish and maintain an effective infection control program that complied with accepted health care, medical, and nursing standards for infection control related to gloving for one of two employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-B). [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) All assisted living facilities must establish and maintain an infection control program that complies with accepted health care, medical, and nursing standards for infection control. [...]”
- Tag 775: 144G.45 Subd. 2. (a) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, pattern scope, scope/level letter E · correction period: Seven (7) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the physical environment of the facility was maintained in compliance with the requirements of Minnesota Statute 144G.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to ensure the physical environment of the facility was maintained in compliance with the requirements of Minnesota Statute 144G. [...]”
Rule cited: “Each assisted living facility must comply with the State Fire Code in Minnesota Rules, chapter 7511, and:”
- Tag 810: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (b-f) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the physical environment of the facility was maintained in compliance with the requirements of Minnesota Statute 144G.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, record review, and interview, the licensee failed to ensure the physical environment of the facility was maintained in compliance with the requirements of Minnesota Statute 144G. [...]”
Rule cited: “(b) Each assisted living facility shall develop and maintain fire safety and evacuation plans. [...]”
- Tag 1530: 144G.64 (a) (1-2) Training in Dementia, Mental Illness, and De- Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure employees received eight hours of initial dementia training within 120 hours of providing direct care to residents for one of two direct care staff (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-B).
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure employees received eight hours of initial dementia training within 120 hours of providing direct care to residents for one of two direct care staff (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-B). [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) All assisted living facilities must meet the following dementia care, mental illness, and de-escalation training requirements: (1) supervisors of direct-care staff must have at least eight hours of initial training on dementia topics specified under [...]”
- Tag 1620: 144G.70 Subd. 2 (c-e) Initial reviews, assessments, and monitoring Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) conducted a resident reassessment and monitoring at least every 90 calendar days for two of two residents (R2, R4).
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) conducted a resident reassessment and monitoring at least every 90 calendar days for two of two residents (R2, R4). [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) Residents who are not receiving any assisted living services shall not be required to undergo an initial nursing assessment. [...]”
From MDH’s letter: the letter says the facility is in substantial compliance; no immediate fines.
Food and beverage inspection (included in this report): Food and beverage inspection report included
Earlier evaluations (1)
- March 24, 2022: report 6IL611 · 19 correction orders
Details
Survey completed June 7, 2022: 5 correction orders
- Tag 480: 144G.41 Subd 1 (13) (i) (B) Minimum requirements (re-issued) scope/level letter F
Details
MDH’s finding, as written: “No further action required.”
Rule cited: “(13) offer to provide or make available at least the following services to residents: (i) at least three nutritious meals daily with snacks available seven days per week, according to the recommended dietary allowances in the United States Department of [...]”
- Tag 780: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (1) Fire protection and physical environment (re-issued) scope/level letter E
Details
MDH’s finding, as written: “No further action required.”
Rule cited: “(a) Each assisted living facility must comply with the State Fire Code in Minnesota Rules, chapter 7511, and: (1) for dwellings or sleeping units, as defined in the State Fire Code: (i) provide smoke alarms in each room used for sleeping purposes; (ii) [...]”
- Tag 790: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (2)-(3) Fire protection and physical environment (re-issued) scope/level letter F
Details
MDH’s finding, as written: “No further action required.”
Rule cited: “(2) install and maintain portable fire extinguishers in accordance with the State Fire Code; (3) install portable fire extinguishers having a minimum 2-A:10-B:C rating within Group R-3 occupancies, as defined by the State Fire Code, located so that the travel [...]”
- Tag 810: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (b)-(f) Fire protection and physical environment (re-issued) scope/level letter F
Details
MDH’s finding, as written: “No further action required.”
Rule cited: “(b) Each assisted living facility shall develop and maintain fire safety and evacuation plans. [...]”
- Tag 1650: 144G.70 Subd. 4 (f) Service plan, implementation and revisions to (re-issued) Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the resident service plan included the required content for three of three residents (R3, R1, R4,) with records reviewed.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the resident service plan included the required content for three of three residents (R3, R1, R4,) with records reviewed. [...]”
Rule cited: “(f) The service plan must include: (1) a description of the services to be provided, the fees for services, and the frequency of each service, according to the resident's current assessment and resident preferences; (2) the identification of staff or [...]”
Survey completed March 24, 2022: 14 correction orders
- Tag 480: 144G.41 Subd 1 (13) (i) (B) Minimum requirements Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared according to the Minnesota Food Code.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared according to the Minnesota Food Code. This had the potential to affect all residents. [...]”
Rule cited: “(13) offer to provide or make available at least the following services to residents: (i) at least three nutritious meals daily with snacks available seven days per week, according to the recommended dietary allowances in the United States Department of [...]”
- Tag 650: 144G.42 Subd. 8 Employee records Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the employee record contained the required content for one of two employees unlicensed personnel (ULP)-B with records reviewed.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the employee record contained the required content for one of two employees unlicensed personnel (ULP)-B with records reviewed. [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) The facility must maintain current records of each paid employee, each regularly scheduled volunteer providing services, and each individual contractor providing services. [...]”
- Tag 780: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (1) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, pattern scope, scope/level letter E · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to maintain proper functioning of the smoke alarm in resident room #202 and failed to provide interconnection of smoke alarms in room #410 as required by Minnesota Statutes, 144G.45, Subd.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to maintain proper functioning of the smoke alarm in resident room #202 and failed to provide interconnection of smoke alarms in room #410 as required by Minnesota Statutes, 144G.45, Subd. 2. This has the potential to directly affect all assisted living residents, visitors, and staff. [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) Each assisted living facility must comply with the State Fire Code in Minnesota Rules, chapter 7511, and: (1) for dwellings or sleeping units, as defined in the State Fire Code: (i) provide smoke alarms in each room used for sleeping purposes; (ii) [...]”
- Tag 790: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (2)-(3) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Fourteen (14) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to maintain portable fire extinguishers in accordance with the State Fire Code as required by MN Statute 144G.45 Subd(a)(2).
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, record review, and interview, the licensee failed to maintain portable fire extinguishers in accordance with the State Fire Code as required by MN Statute 144G.45 Subd(a)(2). This had the potential to directly affect all residents, visitors, and staff. [...]”
Rule cited: “(2) install and maintain portable fire extinguishers in accordance with the State Fire Code; (3) install portable fire extinguishers having a minimum 2-A:10-B:C rating within Group R-3 occupancies, as defined by the State Fire Code, located so that the travel [...]”
- Tag 810: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (b)-(f) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Fourteen
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide all required content on the fire safety and evacuation plan, the required evacuation drills, and the required training of staff on fire safety and evacuation.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, record review, and interview, the licensee failed to provide all required content on the fire safety and evacuation plan, the required evacuation drills, and the required training of staff on fire safety and evacuation. This has the potential to directly affect the safety of staff and all residents receiving care. [...]”
Rule cited: “(b) Each assisted living facility shall develop and maintain fire safety and evacuation plans. [...]”
Show all 14
- Tag 970: 144.50 Subd. 5 Waivers of liability prohibited Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the assisted living contract did not include language waiving the facility's liability for health, safety, or personal property of a resident, with four of four residents (R3, R1, R4, R2) with records reviewed.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the assisted living contract did not include language waiving the facility's liability for health, safety, or personal property of a resident, with four of four residents (R3, R1, R4, R2) with records reviewed. [...]”
Rule cited: “The contract must not include a waiver of facility liability for the health and safety or personal property of a resident. [...]”
- Tag 1460: 144G.63 Subdivision 1 Orientation of staff and supervisors Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the facility failed to ensure staff providing services completed an orientation to assisted living facility licensing requirements and regulations before providing services for one of two employees (registered nurse (RN)-A) with records reviewed.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff providing services completed an orientation to assisted living facility licensing requirements and regulations before providing services for one of two employees (registered nurse (RN)-A) with records reviewed. [...]”
Rule cited: “All staff providing and supervising direct services must complete an orientation to assisted living facility licensing requirements and regulations before providing assisted living services to residents. [...]”
- Tag 1530: 144G.64 TRAINING IN DEMENTIA CARE REQUIRED Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the facility failed to ensure staff providing services completed dementia training within 160 working hours for one of two employees (registered nurse (RN)-A) with records reviewed.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff providing services completed dementia training within 160 working hours for one of two employees (registered nurse (RN)-A) with records reviewed. [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) All assisted living facilities must meet the following training requirements: (1) supervisors of direct-care staff must have at least eight hours of initial training on topics specified under paragraph (b) within 120 working hours of the employment start [...]”
- Tag 1640: 144G.70 Subd. 4 (a-e) Service plan, implementation and revisions to Level 2, pattern scope, scope/level letter E
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure resident service plan and any revisions included a signature or other authentication by the resident and the licensee to document the agreement on the services to be provided for three of four residents (R3, R1, R4) with records reviewed.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure resident service plan and any revisions included a signature or other authentication by the resident and the licensee to document the agreement on the services to be provided for three of four residents (R3, R1, R4) with records reviewed. [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) No later than 14 calendar days after the date that services are first provided, an assisted living facility shall finalize a current written service plan. [...]”
- Tag 1650: 144G.70 Subd. 4 (f) Service plan, implementation and revisions to Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the resident service plan included the required content for four of four residents (R3, R1, R4, R2) with records reviewed.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the resident service plan included the required content for four of four residents (R3, R1, R4, R2) with records reviewed. [...]”
Rule cited: “(f) The service plan must include: (1) a description of the services to be provided, the fees for services, and the frequency of each service, according to the resident's current assessment and resident preferences; (2) the identification of staff or [...]”
- Tag 1730: 144G.71 Subd. 5 Individualized medication management plan Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop an individualized medication management plan with the required content for two of four residents (R1, R4) with records reviewed.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to develop an individualized medication management plan with the required content for two of four residents (R1, R4) with records reviewed. [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) For each resident receiving medication management services, the assisted living facility must prepare and include in the service plan a written statement of the medication management services that will be provided to the resident. [...]”
- Tag 1790: 144G.71 Subd. 10 Medication management for residents who will Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) developed written procedures for the unlicensed personnel (ULP) providing medications for residents having unplanned time away when the licensed nurse was not available.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) developed written procedures for the unlicensed personnel (ULP) providing medications for residents having unplanned time away when the licensed nurse was not available. The licensee failed to ensure one of one employee (ULP-B) was trained and demonstrated competency to the RN to prepare and give medications for residents having unplanned time away. [...]”
Rule cited: “(2) for unplanned time away, when the pharmacy is not able to provide the medications, a licensed nurse or unlicensed personnel shall provide medications in amounts and dosages needed for the length of the anticipated absence, not to exceed seven calendar [...]”
- Tag 1890: 144G.71 Subd. 20 Prescription drugs Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure medications were labeled correctly for one of four residents (R2) with records reviewed.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure medications were labeled correctly for one of four residents (R2) with records reviewed. [...]”
Rule cited: “A prescription drug, prior to being set up for immediate or later administration, must be kept in the original container in which it was dispensed by the pharmacy bearing the original prescription label with legible information including the expiration or [...]”
- Tag 2310: 144G.91 Subd. 4 Appropriate care and services Level 3, isolated scope, scope/level letter G · correction period: Immediate
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide care and services according to acceptable health care standards, medical or nursing standards for one of two residents (R6) who utilized siderails with records reviewed.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to provide care and services according to acceptable health care standards, medical or nursing standards for one of two residents (R6) who utilized siderails with records reviewed. This resulted in an immediate order issued at 2310, on March 22, 2022, at approximately 2:17 p.m. [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) Residents have the right to care and assisted living services that are appropriate based on the resident's needs and according to an up-to-date service plan subject to accepted health care standards.”
Total fines assessed, as printed in the letter: $500.00.
Total fines assessed, as printed in the letter: $3,000.00.
- Tag 480: 144G.41 Subd 1 (13) (i) (B) Minimum requirements (re-issued) scope/level letter F
Substantiated investigations (state reports)
- January 8, 2026 · report HL297196422M · MDH finding: Substantiated, individual responsibility
Details
Allegation, as written: “The alleged perpetrator (AP) financially exploited resident #1, and resident #2 when the AP accepted money as a gift from resident #1 and became a beneficiary (an individual or entity designated to receive benefits) of resident #2's retirement bank account.”
“The Minnesota Department of Health determined financial exploitation was substantiated.”
“The AP was responsible for the maltreatment.”
Summary: MDH looked into an allegation and found: financial exploitation substantiated (individual responsibility).
MDH’s conclusion, as written: “The Minnesota Department of Health determined financial exploitation was substantiated. The AP was responsible for the maltreatment. The AP acquired shared possession of resident #2's retirement account when he became a beneficiary on the account. When resident #2 passed away, the AP designated to receive $110,000 dollars from resident #2's retirement account. In addition, the AP received cash from resident #1 monthly for an unknown total amount, but more that $500.”
Action taken by facility: “During the investigation, the facility suspended the AP and is no longer employed by the facility. Staff were given education about financial exploitation and accepting money/gifts from residents. The AP is no longer employed by the facility.”
Action taken by MDH: “The facility was issued a correction order regarding the vulnerable adult's right to be free from maltreatment.”
Survey completed December 9, 2025: 1 correction order
- Tag 2360: 144G.91 Subd. 8 Freedom from maltreatment
Details
Summary: MDH found the facility failed to ensure two of two residents reviewed (R1 and R2) were free from maltreatment.
MDH’s finding, as written: “The facility failed to ensure two of two residents reviewed (R1 and R2) were free from maltreatment. Findings include: The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) issued a determination maltreatment occurred, and an individual person was responsible for the maltreatment, in connection with incidents which occurred at the facility. Please refer to the public maltreatment report for details.”
Rule cited: “Residents have the right to be free from physical, sexual, and emotional abuse; neglect; financial exploitation; and all forms of maltreatment covered under the Vulnerable Adults Act.”
- Tag 2360: 144G.91 Subd. 8 Freedom from maltreatment
- August 22, 2023 · report HL297192904C
Details
Survey completed August 22, 2023: 1 correction order
- Tag 115: 144G.10 Subd. 2 Licensure categories Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Sixty (60) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to obtain an assisted living facility with dementia care license when the licensee's facility had a locked unit and the residents could not exit the locked door without entering a code.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to obtain an assisted living facility with dementia care license when the licensee's facility had a locked unit and the residents could not exit the locked door without entering a code. This had the potential to affect all nine (9) residents residing in the locked unit. [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) The categories in this subdivision are established for assisted living facility licensure. (1) The assisted living facility category is for assisted living facilities that only provide assisted living services. [...]”
- Tag 115: 144G.10 Subd. 2 Licensure categories Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Sixty (60) days
- August 22, 2023 · report HL297194122C
Details
Survey completed August 22, 2023: 1 correction order
- Tag 115: 144G.10 Subd. 2 Licensure categories Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Sixty (60) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to obtain an assisted living facility with dementia care license when the licensee's facility had a locked unit and the residents could not exit the locked door without entering a code.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to obtain an assisted living facility with dementia care license when the licensee's facility had a locked unit and the residents could not exit the locked door without entering a code. This had the potential to affect all nine (9) residents residing in the locked unit. [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) The categories in this subdivision are established for assisted living facility licensure. (1) The assisted living facility category is for assisted living facilities that only provide assisted living services. [...]”
- Tag 115: 144G.10 Subd. 2 Licensure categories Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Sixty (60) days
Inconclusive investigations (1)
- March 7, 2025 · report HL297197023M · MDH finding: Inconclusive
Details
Allegation, as written: “The facility neglected the resident when safety checks were not completed in accordance with the service plan and the resident was later found in a locked kitchen on the floor with injuries.”
“The Minnesota Department of Health determined neglect was inconclusive.”
Summary: MDH looked into an allegation and found: neglect inconclusive.
MDH’s conclusion, as written: “The Minnesota Department of Health determined neglect was inconclusive. It was unable to be determined whether staff's failure to complete a safety check at the scheduled time resulted in the resident's fall. When staff discovered the resident missing from his room, staff contacted facility administration, the police, and the resident's family. The resident was located and sent to the hospital for evaluation.”
Action taken by facility: “When the resident was discovered missing, staff contacted 911 and searched for the resident.”
Action taken by MDH: “The facility was found to be in noncompliance.”
Survey completed January 14, 2025: 3 correction orders
- Tag 500: 144G.41 Subd. 2 Policies and procedures Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure they had met the requirements for licensure by attesting the managerial officials in charge of day-to-day operations had assisted living licensure facility policies and procedures in place as required and keep them current.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and record review, the licensee failed to ensure they had met the requirements for licensure by attesting the managerial officials in charge of day-to-day operations had assisted living licensure facility policies and procedures in place as required and keep them current. This had the potential to affect all three residents, staff and visitors. [...]”
Rule cited: “Each assisted living facility must have policies and procedures in place to address the following and keep them current: (1) requirements in section 626.557, reporting of maltreatment of vulnerable adults; (2) conducting and handling background studies on [...]”
- Tag 650: 144G.42 Subd. 8 (a) Staff records Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure current employee records were maintained to include the required content of a background study clearance letter for three of six employees (ULP-C, RN-F and ULP-G) with records reviewed.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure current employee records were maintained to include the required content of a background study clearance letter for three of six employees (ULP-C, RN-F and ULP-G) with records reviewed. [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) The facility must maintain current records of each paid staff member, each regularly scheduled volunteer providing services, and each individual contractor providing services. [...]”
- Tag 730: 144G.43 Subd. 3 Contents of resident record Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee staff failed to ensure the content of the resident record included documentation of services identified in the service plan when scheduled night shift safety checks were not documented for one of two residents (R1) with records reviewed.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee staff failed to ensure the content of the resident record included documentation of services identified in the service plan when scheduled night shift safety checks were not documented for one of two residents (R1) with records reviewed. [...]”
Rule cited: “Contents of a resident record include the following for each resident: (1) identifying information, including the resident's name, date of birth, address, and telephone number; (2) the name, address, and telephone number of the resident's emergency contact, [...]”
- Tag 500: 144G.41 Subd. 2 Policies and procedures Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F
Unsubstantiated investigations (1)
- August 8, 2024 · report HL297193000M · MDH finding: Not Substantiated
Details
Allegation, as written: “The facility neglected the resident when they failed to administer scheduled medications as ordered.”
“The Minnesota Department of Health determined neglect was not substantiated.”
Summary: MDH looked into an allegation and found: neglect not substantiated.
MDH’s conclusion, as written: “The Minnesota Department of Health determined neglect was not substantiated. The facility administered medication as directed and followed the medical orders received at the time of the resident's admission.”
Action taken by facility: “The facility identified a change in the resident's condition and sent the resident for further evaluation. The facility maintained communication and engaged with the family, and coordinated additional training and care instructions with the Hospice agency.”
Action taken by MDH: “No further action taken at this time.”
Survey completed June 12, 2024: no correction orders issued.
What the levels and scopes mean (MDH’s words)
Level 2: “a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death”
Level 3: “a violation that harmed a resident's health or safety, not including serious injury, impairment, or death, or a violation that has the potential to lead to serious injury, impairment, or death”
Isolated scope: “when one or a limited number of residents are affected or one or a limited number of staff are involved, or the situation has occurred only occasionally”
Pattern scope: “when more than a limited number of residents are affected, more than a limited number of staff are involved, or the situation has occurred repeatedly; but is not found to be pervasive”
Widespread scope: “when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has affected or has the potential to affect a large portion or all of the residents”
Summaries are ours and are marked “Summary”; quoted text is MDH’s own, shortened where marked [...]. Read the full reports at the links above or search every report on MDH’s site.
What these terms mean
MDH: “An evaluation is a process regulated by the division to ensure licensees comply with the laws, rules, and certifications for the type of care and services authorized under their license/certification.”
“An investigation may occur when the division is notified that care and services are not being provided by licensees as required by law. This may include allegations of abuse, neglect, or financial misuse.”
For maltreatment, Minnesota law defines substantiated as “a preponderance of the evidence shows that an act that meets the definition of maltreatment occurred” and inconclusive as “less than a preponderance of evidence to show that maltreatment did or did not occur” (Minn. Stat. 626.5572).
Correction orders, as MDH explains on each state form: “Tag numbers have been assigned to Minnesota State Statutes for Assisted Living Facilities.” “The letter in the left column is used for tracking purposes and reflects the scope and level issued pursuant to 144G.31 subd. 1, 2, and 3.” MDH adds that there is no requirement to submit a plan of correction for violations of Minnesota state statutes.
MDH keeps investigation results for seven years when allegations are substantiated, four years when inconclusive, and three years when unsubstantiated, so the counts cover different periods. This community is licensed for 97 residents; larger communities are evaluated and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division, data as of September 28, 2026. Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.
License and ownershipActive license, licensee VALORA LLC
- License type
- Assisted Living Facility
- License number
- 425440
- License status
- Active
- Current license dated
- 2026-05-29
- Licensed capacity
- 97
- Licensee
- VALORA LLC
- County
- Hennepin County
- Executive Director
- Gabrielle Gallagher
Source: Minnesota state licensing records (agency listing), retrieved 2026-09-09. Licensing status is a matter of public record; it is not a quality rating.
Executive Director name from public records we reviewed, as of Oct 12, 2026.
Paying with Medicaid and other programsHow Medicaid pays for care in Minnesota, and other programs
How Medicaid pays for care in Minnesota
- Elderly Waiver (EW), customized living services. Minnesota's Elderly Waiver, part of Medical Assistance (Minnesota Medicaid), can pay for "customized living" services, and a provider of those services must hold an assisted living license (or meet certain exceptions). You must qualify for Medical Assistance and need a nursing-home level of care. (state page)
Ask the community whether it accepts Medicaid.
Location and nearby careNearest hospital 3.4 mi, nursing home 1.6 mi, pharmacy 0.3 mi
- Nearest hospital with an emergency room
- M Health Fairview University Of Mn Medical Center, Minneapolis. 3.4 miles away, straight line. CMS overall hospital rating: 4 of 5 stars.
- Nearest Medicare nursing home
- Bywood East Health Care, Minneapolis. 1.6 miles away, straight line.
- Nearest home health agency office
- Provident Home Healthcare, St Anthony. 0.7 miles away, straight line. Agencies travel to clients, so ask which ones serve this address.
- Nearest pharmacy
- Hennepin Healthcare St. Anthony Village Clinic and Pharmacy. 0.3 miles away, straight line. From OpenStreetMap, which does not list every pharmacy, so one may be closer.
- Area
- USDA classes ZIP code 55418 as metropolitan (metropolitan core).
- Dialysis within 15 miles
- Fmc Dialysis - New Brighton, Roseville, 2.0 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 2 of 5 stars)
Davita University Dialysis Unit Riverside, Saint Paul, 3.0 miles away, straight line (has a shift starting after 5 pm; CMS rating 2 of 5 stars)
U Of Mn Med Ctr, Fairview - Dialysis, Minneapolis, 3.4 miles away, straight line - Hospice
- 23 Medicare hospices tell CMS they serve ZIP code 55418.
Interim Healthcare Of The Twin Cities, Inc., office in Roseville, 2.2 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 4 of 5 stars)
Presbyterian Homes Hospice Inc, office in Roseville, 3.4 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 4 of 5 stars)
Accentcare Fairview Hospice - West, LLC, office in Saint Paul, 3.6 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 2 of 5 stars) - Nearest geriatric medicine practice
- Steven Lawler, MD, Minneapolis. 1.1 miles away, straight line. 1 geriatric medicine doctor listed there.
Distances are straight lines from the community, not driving distance. Hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors come from CMS provider data (CMS, hospital list updated Jul 22, 2026). Star ratings are CMS’s own.
Emergency and natural hazard riskFEMA overall risk very low; outside FEMA's high-risk flood areas
Public hazard maps for this location. Ask the community about its emergency plan, its generator and where residents would go in an evacuation.
- Flood zone
- Outside the high and moderate risk flood areas on FEMA's flood map (Zone X, minimal flood hazard, or not studied). (FEMA flood map)
- FEMA National Risk Index
- Overall: very low. By hazard: inland flooding very low, wildfire very low, tornado relatively moderate, heat wave relatively moderate, earthquake very low. These are FEMA’s ratings for the census tract, compared with tracts nationwide. (FEMA, December 2025)
A flood zone describes the map at this point, not the building's elevation. In an emergency, follow the local emergency management agency.
Questions to ask on a tour10 questions picked for this community from its record
Picked for this community from its record. Ask them in person and write down the answers.
- The state recorded a finding in January 2026. What was it, and how was it fixed?
- The current license dates from 2026. Has the owner or operator changed recently?
- What does the base rate include, and when did rates last go up?
- How many caregivers are on duty during the day and at night?
- What happens if care needs increase? When would someone need to move?
- What fees are charged at move-in?
- How do you tell families about falls, illness or changes?
- How long have the executive director and the head of care been here?
- Who gives medications, and what training do they have?
- For what reasons can a resident be asked to leave?
What we checked12 public sources we searched, with dates
Every public source we searched for this community. “Nothing on record” means we found no record that matched it. A record can be missed when a name or address differs.
| Source | Data as of | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division inspection records | Sep 28, 2026 | See above |
| U.S. Department of Labor wage and hour cases | Oct 15, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| OSHA workplace safety inspections since 2016 | Oct 15, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| FEMA flood map | See above | |
| USDA wildfire risk | Apr 15, 2026 | Not shown: FEMA rates wildfire risk here very low |
| FEMA National Risk Index | See above | |
| CMS hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors; OpenStreetMap pharmacies | See above | |
| HUD Multifamily Properties - Assisted | Jul 6, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| State Veterans Homes (NASVH directory) | Sep 20, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| CMS Hospice - General Information | Aug 19, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| CMS Home Health Care Agencies | May 27, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| The community’s own website | See above |
Common questionsAnswers to 4 questions families ask
What type of care does Valora Senior Living of St. Anthony provide?
Valora Senior Living of St. Anthony is licensed by the state of Minnesota for assisted living in St. Anthony, Minnesota. Its licensed capacity is 97 residents.
Does Lilisity rate Valora Senior Living of St. Anthony?
No. We publish state licensing details for Valora Senior Living of St. Anthony but no score, rating, or ranking. Only communities on the Top Communities list or with a Senior Living Alliance Excellence Award, both based on phone-verified resident and family interviews, are ranked.
How much does Valora Senior Living of St. Anthony cost?
Assisted Living in Hennepin County typically starts at $2,500 to $4,400 a month. Based on 18 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price. Valora Senior Living of St. Anthony does not publish its prices.
How do I contact Valora Senior Living of St. Anthony?
Use Valora Senior Living of St. Anthony's website, valoraofstanthony.com, or visit at 2540 Kenzie Terrace, St. Anthony, MN 55418.
How Lilisity works. The only scores or rankings Lilisity publishes are the Top Communities list and the Excellence Awards, both built from phone-verified resident and family interviews. Communities can pay Lilisity a flat monthly fee to manage their own listing: photos, prices, contact details, and receiving the inquiries families choose to send them. The fee is the same no matter how many families contact them or move in. Senior Living Alliance, which runs Lilisity, offers the same listing to its member communities as part of their membership; members pay SLA for its resident and family interview program. No community pays Lilisity per inquiry, per referral or per move-in. Payment never changes a testimonial, a rating, or the order of search results. The "Nearby Senior Living Alliance communities" box shows member communities only. How we verify testimonials · How we are paid