Lilisity

Assisted Living

Tabernacle Home Care

189 Ulmer Drive, Lino Lakes, MN 55014 · Map
Licensed for 5 residents · TABERNACE HOME CARE

State license active
Is this your community? Claim this listing

Tabernacle Home Care is a state-licensed assisted living community in Lino Lakes, Minnesota. It is licensed for 5 residents. Lilisity publishes no score or ranking for this community; the details below come from the state licensing record.

Assisted LivingCare offered
5 residentsLicensed capacity
State licensedAssisted living facility
$2,200 to $4,800/moTypical assisted living start in Minnesota, from 74 communities that publish prices

Prices

This community does not publish its prices.

Area costs

Assisted Living in Minnesota typically starts at $2,200 to $4,800 a month. Based on 74 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price.

Lilisity’s independent report

What the public record shows

Gathered by Lilisity from state and federal sources. Communities can’t edit this part of the page.

State inspections

0Substantiated investigations

Last evaluation: Aug 21, 2025. See the record

License

Active, 5 residents

Assisted Living Facility 421212, current license dated Aug 1, 2025. Licensee TABERNACE HOME CARE.

Nearest emergency room

10.5 miles

M Health Fairview St John'S Hospital, rated 5 of 5 stars by CMS.

Side by side with nearby communities

The 4 nearest communities that offer assisted living, by straight-line distance. Prices are starting prices each community publishes; we never show estimates.

CommunityDistanceLicensed capacityPublished starting priceLicenseInspection citations
Tabernacle Home Care this community5Not publishedActive0 substantiated
Northwoods Memory Care Suites1.4 mi26Not publishedActive1 substantiated
Lino Lakes Assisted Living1.7 mi114Not publishedActive14 substantiated
Daystar Homecare, 108th Lane Northeast3.2 mi5Not publishedActive0 substantiated
Blaine Wp II3.5 mi42Not publishedActive4 substantiated
State inspection record0 substantiated
Last evaluation
August 21, 2025
Evaluations on record
2
Investigations substantiated
0 kept 7 years
Inconclusive
0 kept 4 years
Unsubstantiated
0 kept 3 years

Most recent evaluation (August 21, 2025, state report TMCZ11)

MDH: “On August 18, 2025, through August 21, 2025, the Minnesota Department of Health conducted a full survey at the above provider and the following correction orders are issued.”

Survey completed August 21, 2025: 19 correction orders

  • Tag 480: 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Subd. 1a (a-b) Minimum requirements; required food services Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Please refer to the FBEIR for any compliance dates
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code. This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death), and is issued at a widespread scope (when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b), food must be prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code, Minnesota Rules, chapter 4626. [...]”

  • Tag 660: 144G.42 Subd. 9 Tuberculosis prevention and control Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to establish and maintain a tuberculosis (TB) prevention program based on the most current guidelines issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and Minnesota Department of Health (MDH), which included completion of an annual TB facility risk assessment.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to establish and maintain a tuberculosis (TB) prevention program based on the most current guidelines issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and Minnesota Department of Health (MDH), which included completion of an annual TB facility risk assessment. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) The facility must establish and maintain a comprehensive tuberculosis infection control program according to the most current tuberculosis infection control guidelines issued by the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Division [...]”

  • Tag 780: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (1) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days · fine: $500.00 assessed
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide smoke alarms that were interconnected so that the actuation of one alarm caused all alarms in the dwelling unit to actuate.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to provide smoke alarms that were interconnected so that the actuation of one alarm caused all alarms in the dwelling unit to actuate. This deficient condition had the ability to affect all staff and residents. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) Each assisted living facility must comply with the State Fire Code in Minnesota Rules, chapter 7511, and: (1) for dwellings or sleeping units, as defined in the State Fire Code: (i) provide smoke alarms in each room used for sleeping purposes; (ii) [...]”

  • Tag 810: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (b-f) Fire protection and physical environment Level 3, widespread scope, scope/level letter I · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days · fine: $1,000.00 assessed
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop the fire safety and evacuation plan with the required content and provide the required training and drills.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to develop the fire safety and evacuation plan with the required content and provide the required training and drills. This had the potential to directly affect all residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(b) Each assisted living facility shall develop and maintain fire safety and evacuation plans. [...]”

  • Tag 1060: 144G.52 Subd. 9 Emergency relocation Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide a written notice with required content for an emergency relocation and failed to notify the Office of Ombudsman for Long-Term Care of the emergency relocation for one of one resident (R1).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to provide a written notice with required content for an emergency relocation and failed to notify the Office of Ombudsman for Long-Term Care of the emergency relocation for one of one resident (R1). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) A facility may remove a resident from the facility in an emergency if necessary due to a resident's urgent medical needs or an imminent risk the resident poses to the health or safety of another facility resident or facility staff member. [...]”

Show all 19
  • Tag 1370: 144G.61 Subd. 2 (a) Training and evaluation of unlicensed personn Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure training and competency evaluations were completed for all required skill areas, prior to providing services, for one of one unlicensed personnel (ULP-C).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure training and competency evaluations were completed for all required skill areas, prior to providing services, for one of one unlicensed personnel (ULP-C). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) Training and competency evaluations for all unlicensed personnel must include the following: (1) documentation requirements for all services provided; (2) reports of changes in the resident's condition to the supervisor designated by the facility; (3) [...]”

  • Tag 1380: 144G.61 Subd. 2 (b) Training and evaluation of unlicensed personn Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure training and competency evaluations were completed for all required skill areas, prior to providing services, for one of one unlicensed personnel (ULP-C).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure training and competency evaluations were completed for all required skill areas, prior to providing services, for one of one unlicensed personnel (ULP-C). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(b) In addition to paragraph (a), training and competency evaluation for unlicensed personnel providing assisted living services must include: (1) observing, reporting, and documenting resident status; (2) basic knowledge of body functioning and changes in [...]”

  • Tag 1440: 144G.62 Subd. 4 Supervision of staff providing delegated nurs Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure a registered nurse (RN) conducted direct supervision of staff performing a delegated task within 30 days of providing services for one of one employee (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-C).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure a registered nurse (RN) conducted direct supervision of staff performing a delegated task within 30 days of providing services for one of one employee (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-C). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) Staff who perform delegated nursing or therapy tasks must be supervised by an appropriate licensed health professional or a registered nurse according to the assisted living facility's policy where the services are being provided to verify that the work [...]”

  • Tag 1500: 144G.63 Subd. 5 Required annual training Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure an employee received at least eight hours of annual training for each 12 months of employment for one of one employee (clinical nurse supervisor (CNS)-B).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure an employee received at least eight hours of annual training for each 12 months of employment for one of one employee (clinical nurse supervisor (CNS)-B). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) All staff that perform direct services must complete at least eight hours of annual training for each 12 months of employment. [...]”

  • Tag 1530: 144G.64 (a) (1-2) Training in Dementia, Mental Illness, and De- Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure direct care staff received the required amount of dementia care training in the required time frame for one of two employees (clinical nurse supervisor (CNS)-B).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure direct care staff received the required amount of dementia care training in the required time frame for one of two employees (clinical nurse supervisor (CNS)-B). In addition, the licensee failed to ensure direct care staff received the required 2 hours of initial training on mental illness and de-escalation topics effective July 1, 2025, for two of two employees (CNS-B and unlicensed personnel (ULP)-C). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) All assisted living facilities must meet the following dementia care, mental illness, and de-escalation training requirements: (1) supervisors of direct-care staff must have at least eight hours of initial training on dementia topics specified under [...]”

  • Tag 1620: 144G.70 Subd. 2 (c-e) Initial reviews, assessments, and monitoring Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) completed ongoing reassessments and monitoring on or before day 90 or with any change of condition and failed to use the uniform assessment tool for one of one resident (R1). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) Residents who are not receiving any assisted living services shall not be required to undergo an initial nursing assessment. [...]”

  • Tag 1640: 144G.70 Subd. 4 (a-e) Service plan, implementation and revisions to Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure a service plan was developed for one of one resident (R1).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure a service plan was developed for one of one resident (R1). This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety) and was issued at a widespread scope (when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has affected or has the potential to affect a large portion or all the residents). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) No later than 14 calendar days after the date that services are first provided, an assisted living facility shall finalize a current written service plan. [...]”

  • Tag 1710: 144G.71 Subd. 3 Individualized medication monitoring and reas Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) completed annual medication reassessments for one of one resident (R1).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) completed annual medication reassessments for one of one resident (R1). This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety) and was issued at a widespread scope (when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has affected or has the potential to affect a large [...]”

    Rule cited: “A registered nurse, advanced practice registered nurse, or qualified staff delegated the task by a registered nurse must monitor and reassess the resident's medication management services as needed under subdivision 2 when the resident presents with symptoms [...]”

  • Tag 1790: 144G.71 Subd. 10 Medication management for residents who will Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) completed training and competencies for the unlicensed personnel (ULP) providing medications for residents with unplanned time away from home when the licensed nurse was not available for one of one unlicensed personnel (ULP)-C).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) completed training and competencies for the unlicensed personnel (ULP) providing medications for residents with unplanned time away from home when the licensed nurse was not available for one of one unlicensed personnel (ULP)-C). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(2) for unplanned time away, when the pharmacy is not able to provide the medications, a licensed nurse or unlicensed personnel shall provide medications in amounts and dosages needed for the length of the anticipated absence, not to exceed seven calendar [...]”

  • Tag 1890: 144G.71 Subd. 20 Prescription drugs Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure medications were maintained bearing legible information including the original prescription label and opened-on date or expiration date for time sensitive medication for one of one resident (R1) who received medication management services.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure medications were maintained bearing legible information including the original prescription label and opened-on date or expiration date for time sensitive medication for one of one resident (R1) who received medication management services. [...]”

    Rule cited: “A prescription drug, prior to being set up for immediate or later administration, must be kept in the original container in which it was dispensed by the pharmacy bearing the original prescription label with legible information including the expiration or [...]”

  • Tag 1940: 144G.72 Subd. 3 Individualized treatment or therapy managemen Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop a treatment or therapy management plan to include the required content for one of one resident (R1).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to develop a treatment or therapy management plan to include the required content for one of one resident (R1). [...]”

    Rule cited: “For each resident receiving management of ordered or prescribed treatments or therapy services, the assisted living facility must prepare and include in the service plan a written statement of the treatment or therapy services that will be provided to the [...]”

  • Tag 1950: 144G.72 Subd. 4 Administration of treatments and therapy Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) specified, in writing, specific instructions for one of one resident (R1) receiving treatment management services.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) specified, in writing, specific instructions for one of one resident (R1) receiving treatment management services. [...]”

    Rule cited: “Ordered or prescribed treatments or therapies must be administered by a nurse, physician, or other licensed health professional authorized to perform the treatment or therapy, or may be delegated or assigned to unlicensed personnel by the licensed health [...]”

  • Tag 1970: 144G.72 Subd. 6 Treatment and therapy orders Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review the licensee failed to ensure up-to-date written or electronically recorded orders were maintained for one of one resident (R1) receiving treatments. [...]”

    Rule cited: “There must be an up-to-date written or electronically recorded order from an authorized prescriber for all treatments and therapies. [...]”

  • Tag 2310: 144G.91 Subd. 4 (a) Appropriate care and services Level 3, widespread scope, scope/level letter I · correction period: Immediate · fine: $1,000.00 assessed
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide care and services according to acceptable health care, medical or nursing standards for one of one resident (R1) with hospital-style bed rails.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to provide care and services according to acceptable health care, medical or nursing standards for one of one resident (R1) with hospital-style bed rails. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) Residents have the right to care and assisted living services that are appropriate based on the resident's needs and according to an up-to-date service plan subject to accepted health care standards.”

Fines assessed by MDH

  • Tag 780 (144g.45 Subd.2 (a) (1) - Fire Protection And PhysicalEnvironment): $500.00
  • Tag 810 (144g.45 Subd.2 (b-F)- Fire Protection And PhysicalEnvironment): $1,000.00
  • Tag 2310 (144g.91 Subd.4 (a) - Appropriate CareAnd Services): $1,000.00

Total fines assessed, as printed in the letter: $2,500.00.

Earlier evaluations (1)
  • August 11, 2023: report P8JV11 · 3 correction orders
    Details

    Survey completed August 11, 2023: 3 correction orders

    • Tag 460: 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Minimum requirements Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) Days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure one of one residents (R1) had a system in place to request assistance 24 hours per day, seven days per week.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview, and observation, the licensee failed to ensure one of one residents (R1) had a system in place to request assistance 24 hours per day, seven days per week. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(5) provide a means for residents to request assistance for health and safety needs 24 hours per day, seven days per week; (6) allow residents the ability to furnish and decorate the resident's unit within the terms of the assisted living contract; (7) permit [...]”

    • Tag 480: 144G.41 Subd 1 (13) (i) (B) Minimum requirements Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared according to the Minnesota Food Code.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared according to the Minnesota Food Code. This had the potential to affect all residents. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(13) offer to provide or make available at least the following services to residents: (B) food must be prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code, Minnesota Rules, chapter 4626; and”

    • Tag 810: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (b)-(f) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide all required contents on the fire safety and evacuation plan.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on document review and interview, the licensee failed to provide all required contents on the fire safety and evacuation plan. This has the potential to directly affect the safety of resident(s) receiving assisted living care. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(b) Each assisted living facility shall develop and maintain fire safety and evacuation plans. [...]”

    From MDH’s letter: the letter says the facility is in substantial compliance; MDH granted the assisted living license; no immediate fines.

What the levels and scopes mean (MDH’s words)

Level 2: “a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death”

Level 3: “a violation that harmed a resident's health or safety, not including serious injury, impairment, or death, or a violation that has the potential to lead to serious injury, impairment, or death”

Isolated scope: “when one or a limited number of residents are affected or one or a limited number of staff are involved, or the situation has occurred only occasionally”

Pattern scope: “when more than a limited number of residents are affected, more than a limited number of staff are involved, or the situation has occurred repeatedly; but is not found to be pervasive”

Widespread scope: “when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has affected or has the potential to affect a large portion or all of the residents”

Summaries are ours and are marked “Summary”; quoted text is MDH’s own, shortened where marked [...]. Read the full reports at the links above or search every report on MDH’s site.

What these terms mean

MDH: “An evaluation is a process regulated by the division to ensure licensees comply with the laws, rules, and certifications for the type of care and services authorized under their license/certification.”

“An investigation may occur when the division is notified that care and services are not being provided by licensees as required by law. This may include allegations of abuse, neglect, or financial misuse.”

For maltreatment, Minnesota law defines substantiated as “a preponderance of the evidence shows that an act that meets the definition of maltreatment occurred” and inconclusive as “less than a preponderance of evidence to show that maltreatment did or did not occur” (Minn. Stat. 626.5572).

Correction orders, as MDH explains on each state form: “Tag numbers have been assigned to Minnesota State Statutes for Assisted Living Facilities.” “The letter in the left column is used for tracking purposes and reflects the scope and level issued pursuant to 144G.31 subd. 1, 2, and 3.” MDH adds that there is no requirement to submit a plan of correction for violations of Minnesota state statutes.

MDH keeps investigation results for seven years when allegations are substantiated, four years when inconclusive, and three years when unsubstantiated, so the counts cover different periods. This community is licensed for 5 residents; larger communities are evaluated and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division, data as of September 28, 2026. Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.

License and ownershipActive license, licensee TABERNACE HOME CARE
License type
Assisted Living Facility
License number
421212
License status
Active
Current license dated
2025-08-01
Licensed capacity
5
Licensee
TABERNACE HOME CARE
Administrator/Authorized Agent
Lamessa Boka

Source: Minnesota state licensing records (agency listing), retrieved 2026-09-09. Licensing status is a matter of public record; it is not a quality rating.

Administrator/Authorized Agent name from the Minnesota licensing record, as of Sep 9, 2026.

Paying with Medicaid and other programsHow Medicaid pays for care in Minnesota, and other programs

How Medicaid pays for care in Minnesota

  • Elderly Waiver (EW), customized living services. Minnesota's Elderly Waiver, part of Medical Assistance (Minnesota Medicaid), can pay for "customized living" services, and a provider of those services must hold an assisted living license (or meet certain exceptions). You must qualify for Medical Assistance and need a nursing-home level of care. (state page)

Ask the community whether it accepts Medicaid.

Location and nearby careNearest hospital 10.5 mi, nursing home 4.6 mi, pharmacy 1.3 mi
Nearest hospital with an emergency room
M Health Fairview St John'S Hospital, Maplewood. 10.5 miles away, straight line. CMS overall hospital rating: 5 of 5 stars.
Nearest Medicare nursing home
Presbyterian Homes of North Oaks, North Oaks. 4.6 miles away, straight line.
Nearest home health agency office
Tru Healthcare, Inc, Arden Hills. 7.3 miles away, straight line. Agencies travel to clients, so ask which ones serve this address.
Nearest pharmacy
Walmart Pharmacy. 1.3 miles away, straight line. From OpenStreetMap, which does not list every pharmacy, so one may be closer.
Area
USDA classes ZIP code 55014 as metropolitan (metropolitan core).
Dialysis within 15 miles
Davita Central Avenue Dialysis, Blaine, 4.9 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 3 of 5 stars)
Fmc - Blaine Dialysis, Blaine, 5.5 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 4 of 5 stars)
Fmc Dialysis - North Suburban, Coon Rapids, 7.1 miles away, straight line (has a shift starting after 5 pm; CMS rating 4 of 5 stars)
Hospice
19 Medicare hospices tell CMS they serve ZIP code 55014.
Olive Grove Hospice LLC, office in Blaine, 3.5 miles away, straight line
Ecumen Hospice, office in Shoreview, 7.9 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 4 of 5 stars)
Presbyterian Homes Hospice Inc, office in Roseville, 9.4 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 4 of 5 stars)
Nearest geriatric medicine practice
Allina Health System, Coon Rapids. 7.1 miles away, straight line. 1 geriatric medicine doctor listed there.

Distances are straight lines from the community, not driving distance. Hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors come from CMS provider data (CMS, hospital list updated Jul 22, 2026). Star ratings are CMS’s own.

Emergency and natural hazard riskFEMA overall risk relatively low; outside FEMA's high-risk flood areas

Public hazard maps for this location. Ask the community about its emergency plan, its generator and where residents would go in an evacuation.

Flood zone
Outside the high and moderate risk flood areas on FEMA's flood map (Zone X, minimal flood hazard, or not studied). (FEMA flood map)
FEMA National Risk Index
Overall: relatively low. By hazard: inland flooding relatively moderate, wildfire relatively low, tornado relatively moderate, heat wave relatively low, earthquake very low. These are FEMA’s ratings for the census tract, compared with tracts nationwide. (FEMA, December 2025)

A flood zone describes the map at this point, not the building's elevation. In an emergency, follow the local emergency management agency.

Questions to ask on a tour10 questions picked for this community from its record

Picked for this community from its record. Ask them in person and write down the answers.

  1. The current license dates from 2025. Has the owner or operator changed recently?
  2. What does the base rate include, and when did rates last go up?
  3. Who is here at night? Are they awake, or asleep and on call?
  4. Who covers when the owner is sick, on vacation, or away for the day? Can we meet them?
  5. Is it one flat rate, or does it rise with care needs?
  6. Can you help someone who needs two people to move, or a mechanical lift?
  7. How many caregivers are on duty during the day and at night?
  8. What happens if care needs increase? When would someone need to move?
  9. What fees are charged at move-in?
  10. How do you tell families about falls, illness or changes?
What we checked11 public sources we searched, with dates

Every public source we searched for this community. “Nothing on record” means we found no record that matched it. A record can be missed when a name or address differs.

SourceData as ofWhat we found
Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division inspection recordsSep 28, 2026See above
U.S. Department of Labor wage and hour casesOct 15, 2026Nothing on record
OSHA workplace safety inspections since 2016Oct 15, 2026Nothing on record
FEMA flood mapSee above
USDA wildfire riskApr 15, 2026Not shown: FEMA rates wildfire risk here relatively low
FEMA National Risk IndexSee above
CMS hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors; OpenStreetMap pharmaciesSee above
HUD Multifamily Properties - AssistedJul 6, 2026Nothing on record
State Veterans Homes (NASVH directory)Sep 20, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Hospice - General InformationAug 19, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Home Health Care AgenciesMay 27, 2026Nothing on record
Common questionsAnswers to 4 questions families ask
What type of care does Tabernacle Home Care provide?

Tabernacle Home Care is licensed by the state of Minnesota for assisted living in Lino Lakes, Minnesota. Its licensed capacity is 5 residents.

Does Lilisity rate Tabernacle Home Care?

No. We publish state licensing details for Tabernacle Home Care but no score, rating, or ranking. Only communities on the Top Communities list or with a Senior Living Alliance Excellence Award, both based on phone-verified resident and family interviews, are ranked.

How much does Tabernacle Home Care cost?

Assisted Living in Minnesota typically starts at $2,200 to $4,800 a month. Based on 74 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price. Tabernacle Home Care does not publish its prices.

How do I contact Tabernacle Home Care?

Visit Tabernacle Home Care at 189 Ulmer Drive, Lino Lakes, MN 55014.

Choosing a small care homeOur care guide: what to look for, what it costs, how families pay, and more questions to ask (PDF)

Report a wrong fact

How Lilisity works. The only scores or rankings Lilisity publishes are the Top Communities list and the Excellence Awards, both built from phone-verified resident and family interviews. Communities can pay Lilisity a flat monthly fee to manage their own listing: photos, prices, contact details, and receiving the inquiries families choose to send them. The fee is the same no matter how many families contact them or move in. Senior Living Alliance, which runs Lilisity, offers the same listing to its member communities as part of their membership; members pay SLA for its resident and family interview program. No community pays Lilisity per inquiry, per referral or per move-in. Payment never changes a testimonial, a rating, or the order of search results. The "Nearby Senior Living Alliance communities" box shows member communities only. How we verify testimonials · How we are paid