Lilisity

Assisted Living and Memory Care

Suite Living Senior Care of VA

580 Liberty Way, Vadnais Heights, MN 55127 · Map
Licensed for 32 residents · SUITE LIVING SENIOR CARE OF VADNAIS

State license active
Is this your community? Claim this listing

Suite Living Senior Care of VA is a state-licensed assisted living, memory care community in Vadnais Heights, Minnesota. It is licensed for 32 residents. Lilisity publishes no score or ranking for this community; the details below come from the state licensing record.

Assisted LivingAlso memory care
32 residentsLicensed capacity
State licensedAssisted living facility dementia care
$2,200 to $4,800/moTypical assisted living start in Minnesota, from 74 communities that publish prices

Prices

This community does not publish its prices.

Area costs

Assisted Living in Minnesota typically starts at $2,200 to $4,800 a month. Based on 74 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price.
Memory Care in Minnesota typically starts at $3,900 to $8,600 a month. Based on 40 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price.

Lilisity’s independent report

What the public record shows

Gathered by Lilisity from state and federal sources. Communities can’t edit this part of the page.

State inspections

2Substantiated investigations

Last evaluation: Sep 9, 2025. See the record

License

Active, 32 residents

Assisted Living Facility Dementia Care 425765, current license dated Jul 1, 2026. Licensee SUITE LIVING SENIOR CARE OF VADNAIS.

State inspection record2 substantiated
Last evaluation
September 9, 2025
Evaluations on record
2
Investigations substantiated
2 kept 7 years
Inconclusive
0 kept 4 years
Unsubstantiated
1 kept 3 years

Most recent evaluation (September 9, 2025, state report R2ZR11)

MDH: “******ATTENTION****** ASSISTED LIVING PROVIDER FOLLOW UP SURVEY WITH RE-ISSUE OF ORDERS INITIALCOMMENTS SL33260016-1 From December 16, 2025, through December 17, 2025, the Minnesota Department of Health conducted a follow-up survey at the above provider to follow-up on orders issued pursuant to a survey completed on September 12, 2025.”

Survey completed December 17, 2025: 12 correction orders

  • Tag 510: 144G.41 Subd. 3 Infection control program (re-issued) scope/level letter E
    Details

    Rule cited: “(a) All assisted living facilities must establish and maintain an infection control program that complies with accepted health care, medical, and nursing standards for infection control. [...]”

  • Tag 650: 144G.42 Subd. 8 (a) Staff records (re-issued) scope/level letter D
    Details

    Rule cited: “(a) The facility must maintain current records of each paid staff member, each regularly scheduled volunteer providing services, and each individual contractor providing services. [...]”

  • Tag 775: 144G.45 Subd. 2. (a) Fire protection and physical environment (re-issued) scope/level letter F · fine: $500.00 assessed
    Details

    Rule cited: “Each assisted living facility must comply with the State Fire Code in Minnesota Rules, chapter 7511, and:”

  • Tag 800: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (4) Fire protection and physical environment (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    Rule cited: “(4) keep the physical environment, including walls, floors, ceiling, all furnishings, grounds, systems, and equipment in a continuous state of good repair and operation with regard to the health, safety, comfort, and well-being of the residents in accordance [...]”

  • Tag 900: 144G.50 Subdivision 1 Contract required (re-issued) scope/level letter E
    Details

    Rule cited: “(a) An assisted living facility may not offer or provide housing or assisted living services to any individual unless it has executed a written contract with the resident. [...]”

Show all 12
  • Tag 1420: 144G.62 Subd. 2 Delegation of assisted living services (re-issued) scope/level letter D
    Details

    Rule cited: “(b) When the registered nurse or licensed health professional delegates tasks to unlicensed personnel, that person must ensure that prior to the delegation the unlicensed personnel is trained in the proper methods to perform the tasks or procedures for each [...]”

  • Tag 1730: 144G.71 Subd. 5 Individualized medication management plan (re-issued) scope/level letter D
    Details

    Rule cited: “(a) For each resident receiving medication management services, a registered nurse, advanced practice registered nurse, or qualified staff delegated the task by a registered nurse must prepare and include in the service plan a written statement of the [...]”

  • Tag 1890: 144G.71 Subd. 20 Prescription drugs Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure accurate prescription labeling for four of four residents (R2, R6, R7, R8) with insulin pens observed during medication administration.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure accurate prescription labeling for four of four residents (R2, R6, R7, R8) with insulin pens observed during medication administration. [...]”

    Rule cited: “A prescription drug, prior to being set up for immediate or later administration, must be kept in the original container in which it was dispensed by the pharmacy bearing the original prescription label with legible information including the expiration or [...]”

  • Tag 1960: 144G.72 Subd. 5 Documentation of administration of treatments (re-issued) scope/level letter D
    Details

    Rule cited: “Each treatment or therapy administered by an assisted living facility must be in the resident record. [...]”

  • Tag 1970: 144G.72 Subd. 6 Treatment and therapy orders (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    Rule cited: “There must be an up-to-date written or electronically recorded order from an authorized prescriber for all treatments and therapies. [...]”

  • Tag 2310: 144G.91 Subd. 4 (a) Appropriate care and services (re-issued) Level 3, isolated scope, scope/level letter G · fine: $1,000.00 assessed
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide care and services according to acceptable health care standards, medical or nursing standards for one of one resident (R3) who utilized side rails.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to provide care and services according to acceptable health care standards, medical or nursing standards for one of one resident (R3) who utilized side rails. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) Residents have the right to care and assisted living services that are appropriate based on the resident's needs and according to an up-to-date service plan subject to accepted health care standards.”

  • Tag 2320: 144G.91 Subd. 4 (b) Appropriate care and services (re-issued) scope/level letter D
    Details

    Rule cited: “(b) Residents have the right to receive health care and other assisted living services with continuity from people who are properly trained and competent to perform their duties and in sufficient numbers to adequately provide the services agreed to in the [...]”

Survey completed September 12, 2025: 14 correction orders

  • Tag 510: 144G.41 Subd. 3 Infection control program Level 2, pattern scope, scope/level letter E · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to establish and maintain an infection control program to comply with accepted health care, medical and nursing standards for infection control for one of two unlicensed personnel ((ULP)-B) during medication administration to residents.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to establish and maintain an infection control program to comply with accepted health care, medical and nursing standards for infection control for one of two unlicensed personnel ((ULP)-B) during medication administration to residents. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) All assisted living facilities must establish and maintain an infection control program that complies with accepted health care, medical, and nursing standards for infection control. [...]”

  • Tag 650: 144G.42 Subd. 8 (a) Staff records Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the employee record contained the required content for one of unlicensed personnel ((ULP)-B).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the employee record contained the required content for one of unlicensed personnel ((ULP)-B). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) The facility must maintain current records of each paid staff member, each regularly scheduled volunteer providing services, and each individual contractor providing services. [...]”

  • Tag 775: 144G.45 Subd. 2. (a) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days · fine: $500.00 assessed
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to comply with Minnesota State Fire Code in Minnesota Rules chapter 7511.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to comply with Minnesota State Fire Code in Minnesota Rules chapter 7511. This deficient condition had the ability to affect all staff and residents. [...]”

    Rule cited: “Each assisted living facility must comply with the State Fire Code in Minnesota Rules, chapter 7511, and:”

  • Tag 800: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (4) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to maintain the physical environment, in a continuous state of good repair and operation with regard to the health, safety, comfort, and well-being of the residents.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to maintain the physical environment, in a continuous state of good repair and operation with regard to the health, safety, comfort, and well-being of the residents. This deficient condition had the potential to affect all staff, residents, and visitors. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(4) keep the physical environment, including walls, floors, ceiling, all furnishings, grounds, systems, and equipment in a continuous state of good repair and operation with regard to the health, safety, comfort, and well-being of the residents in accordance [...]”

  • Tag 900: 144G.50 Subdivision 1 Contract required Level 2, pattern scope, scope/level letter E · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop and execute a written contract with the required content for five of six residents (R5, R12, R13, R14, R15).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to develop and execute a written contract with the required content for five of six residents (R5, R12, R13, R14, R15). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) An assisted living facility may not offer or provide housing or assisted living services to any individual unless it has executed a written contract with the resident. [...]”

Show all 14
  • Tag 1420: 144G.62 Subd. 2 Delegation of assisted living services Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) ensured training and competency demonstrations were completed for one of two employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-B) for the use of a Broda chair (oversized cushioned wheelchair).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) ensured training and competency demonstrations were completed for one of two employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-B) for the use of a Broda chair (oversized cushioned wheelchair). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(b) When the registered nurse or licensed health professional delegates tasks to unlicensed personnel, that person must ensure that prior to the delegation the unlicensed personnel is trained in the proper methods to perform the tasks or procedures for each [...]”

  • Tag 1730: 144G.71 Subd. 5 Individualized medication management plan Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop an individualized medication management record with the required content for one of one resident (R11) receiving medication management services.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to develop an individualized medication management record with the required content for one of one resident (R11) receiving medication management services. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) For each resident receiving medication management services, a registered nurse, advanced practice registered nurse, or qualified staff delegated the task by a registered nurse must prepare and include in the service plan a written statement of the [...]”

  • Tag 1760: 144G.71 Subd. 8 Documentation of administration of medication Level 4, pattern scope, scope/level letter K · correction period: IMMEDIATE · fine: $3,000.00 assessed
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure medication orders were accurately administered for six of eight residents (R2, R5, R6, R8, R9, R11).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure medication orders were accurately administered for six of eight residents (R2, R5, R6, R8, R9, R11). [...]”

    Rule cited: “Each medication administered by the assisted living facility staff must be documented in the resident's record. The documentation must include the signature and title of the person who administered the medication. [...]”

  • Tag 1880: 144G.71 Subd. 19 Storage of medications Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure medications were secure and permitted access to only authorized personnel.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure medications were secure and permitted access to only authorized personnel. This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death) and was issued at a widespread scope (when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure [...]”

    Rule cited: “An assisted living facility must store all prescription medications in securely locked and substantially constructed compartments according to the manufacturer's directions and permit only authorized personnel to have access.”

  • Tag 1910: 144G.71 Subd. 22 Disposition of medications Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to dispose of medications upon expiration for one of three

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to dispose of medications upon expiration for one of three residents (R7) receiving insulin administration assistance. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) Any current medications being managed by the assisted living facility must be provided to the resident when the resident's service plan ends or medication management services are no longer part of the service plan. [...]”

  • Tag 1960: 144G.72 Subd. 5 Documentation of administration of treatments Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure resident specific documentation of the administration of a provided treatment was completed for one of one resident (R7) receiving treatments.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure resident specific documentation of the administration of a provided treatment was completed for one of one resident (R7) receiving treatments. [...]”

    Rule cited: “Each treatment or therapy administered by an assisted living facility must be in the resident record. [...]”

  • Tag 1970: 144G.72 Subd. 6 Treatment and therapy orders Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to obtain prescriber orders for all treatments and therapies, including the frequency, duration and other information needed to administer the treatment or therapy for one of one resident (R5) using compression stockings (TED hose).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to obtain prescriber orders for all treatments and therapies, including the frequency, duration and other information needed to administer the treatment or therapy for one of one resident (R5) using compression stockings (TED hose). [...]”

    Rule cited: “There must be an up-to-date written or electronically recorded order from an authorized prescriber for all treatments and therapies. [...]”

  • Tag 2310: 144G.91 Subd. 4 (a) Appropriate care and services Level 3, isolated scope, scope/level letter G · correction period: Immediate · fine: $1,000.00 assessed
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide care and services according to acceptable health care standards, medical or nursing standards for one of one resident (R3) who utilized a portable side rail.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to provide care and services according to acceptable health care standards, medical or nursing standards for one of one resident (R3) who utilized a portable side rail. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) Residents have the right to care and assisted living services that are appropriate based on the resident's needs and according to an up-to-date service plan subject to accepted health care standards.”

  • Tag 2320: 144G.91 Subd. 4 (b) Appropriate care and services Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure unlicensed personnel (ULP)-B followed appropriate medication administration procedures for one of one resident (R2) while administering medications.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure unlicensed personnel (ULP)-B followed appropriate medication administration procedures for one of one resident (R2) while administering medications. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(b) Residents have the right to receive health care and other assisted living services with continuity from people who are properly trained and competent to perform their duties and in sufficient numbers to adequately provide the services agreed to in the [...]”

From MDH’s letter: the letter says the facility is in substantial compliance.

Food and beverage inspection (included in this report): No orders were issued for this inspection report.

Fines assessed by MDH

  • Tag 775 (144g.45 Subd.2. (a) - Fire Protection And PhysicalEnvironment): $500.00
  • Tag 1760 (144g.71 Subd.8 - DocumentationOf Administration Of Medication): $3,000.00
  • Tag 2310 (144g.91 Subd.4 (a) - Appropriate CareAnd Services): $1,000.00

Total fines assessed, as printed in the letter: $1,000.00.

Total fines assessed, as printed in the letter: $4,500.00.

Earlier evaluations (1)
  • July 28, 2022: report 3NZR11 · 20 correction orders
    Details

    Survey completed July 28, 2022: 20 correction orders

    • Tag 430: 144G.40 Subd. 2 Uniform checklist disclosure of services Level 2, pattern scope, scope/level letter C · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide a copy of the Uniform Checklist Disclosure of Assisted Living Services and Amenities (UDALSA) with the required content for three of three residents (R1, R2, R3) with records reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to provide a copy of the Uniform Checklist Disclosure of Assisted Living Services and Amenities (UDALSA) with the required content for three of three residents (R1, R2, R3) with records reviewed. This affected all residents admitted to the facility prior to August 1, 2021. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) All assisted living facilities must provide to prospective residents: (1) a disclosure of the categories of assisted living licenses available and the category of license held by the facility; (2) a written checklist listing all services permitted under [...]”

    • Tag 480: 144G.41 Subd 1 (13) (i) (B) Minimum requirements Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code, Minnesota Rules, chapter 4626.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code, Minnesota Rules, chapter 4626. This had the potential to affect all 28 residents of the facility. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(13) offer to provide or make available at least the following services to residents: (i) at least three nutritious meals daily with snacks available seven days per week, according to the recommended dietary allowances in the United States Department of [...]”

    • Tag 485: 144G.41 Subd 1. (13) (i) (A) and (C) Minimum Requirements Level 1, widespread scope, scope/level letter C · correction period: Twenty-one
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the Assisted Living contract did not require any resident to include and pay for meals as a part of their assisted living package fee for 3 of 3 residents with records reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the Assisted Living contract did not require any resident to include and pay for meals as a part of their assisted living package fee for 3 of 3 residents with records reviewed. This had the potential to affect all residents of the facility. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(13) offer to provide or make available at least the following services to residents: (i) at least three nutritious meals daily with snacks available seven days per week, according to the recommended dietary allowances in the United States Department of [...]”

    • Tag 510: 144G.41 Subd. 3 Infection control program Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Two (2) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to establish and maintain an effective infection control program to comply with accepted health care, medical, and nursing standards for infection control and current recommendations for COVID-19.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to establish and maintain an effective infection control program to comply with accepted health care, medical, and nursing standards for infection control and current recommendations for COVID-19. The licensee failed to ensure shared medical equipment was disinfected between use with residents. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) All assisted living facilities must establish and maintain an infection control program that complies with accepted health care, medical, and nursing standards for infection control. [...]”

    • Tag 680: 144G.42 Subd. 10 Disaster planning and emergency preparedness Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop a written emergency preparedness (EP) plan with all the required content.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to develop a written emergency preparedness (EP) plan with all the required content. This had the potential to affect all twenty-eight (28) residents, staff and visitors. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) The facility must meet the following requirements: (1) have a written emergency disaster plan that contains a plan for evacuation, addresses elements of sheltering in place, identifies temporary relocation sites, and details staff assignments in the event [...]”

    Show all 20
    • Tag 730: 144G.43 Subd. 3 Contents of resident record Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the resident record included documentation of all provided services for three of three residents (R1, R2, R3), and failed to document the disposition of medications for one of one resident (R4), with records reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the resident record included documentation of all provided services for three of three residents (R1, R2, R3), and failed to document the disposition of medications for one of one resident (R4), with records reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “Contents of a resident record include the following for each resident: (1) identifying information, including the resident's name, date of birth, address, and telephone number; (2) the name, address, and telephone number of the resident's emergency contact, [...]”

    • Tag 800: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (4) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to maintain the physical environment of the facility in a continuous state of good repair and operation.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to maintain the physical environment of the facility in a continuous state of good repair and operation. This has the potential to directly affect the health, safety, and well-being of all residents and staff. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(4) keep the physical environment, including walls, floors, ceiling, all furnishings, grounds, systems, and equipment in a continuous state of good repair and operation with regard to the health, safety, comfort, and well-being of the residents in accordance [...]”

    • Tag 810: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (b)-(f) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Fourteen (14) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide the minimum number of fire and evacuation drills.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on record review and interview, the licensee failed to provide the minimum number of fire and evacuation drills. This has the potential to directly affect the safety of all residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(b) Each assisted living facility shall develop and maintain fire safety and evacuation plans. [...]”

    • Tag 900: 144G.50 Subdivision 1 Contract required Level 1, widespread scope, scope/level letter C · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop and execute a written assisted living contract with the required content for three of three residents (R1, R2, R3) with records reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to develop and execute a written assisted living contract with the required content for three of three residents (R1, R2, R3) with records reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) An assisted living facility may not offer or provide housing or assisted living services to any individual unless it has executed a written contract with the resident. [...]”

    • Tag 950: 144.50 Subd. 3 Designation of representative Level 2, pattern scope, scope/level letter E · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to offer the opportunity to identify a designated representative for three of three residents (R1, R2, R3) with records reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to offer the opportunity to identify a designated representative for three of three residents (R1, R2, R3) with records reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) Before or at the time of execution of an assisted living contract, an assisted living facility must offer the resident the opportunity to identify a designated representative in writing in the contract and must provide the following verbatim notice on a [...]”

    • Tag 970: 144.50 Subd. 5 Waivers of liability prohibited Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the assisted living contract did not include language waiving the facility's liability for health, safety, or personal property of a resident.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the assisted living contract did not include language waiving the facility's liability for health, safety, or personal property of a resident. This had the potential to affect the twenty-eight (28) residents residing in the facility and future residents. [...]”

      Rule cited: “The contract must not include a waiver of facility liability for the health and safety or personal property of a resident. [...]”

    • Tag 1620: 144G.70 Subd. 2 (c-e) Initial reviews, assessments, and monitoring Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) completed a reassessment for a change in condition for one of five residents (R5) with records reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) completed a reassessment for a change in condition for one of five residents (R5) with records reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(c) Resident reassessment and monitoring must be conducted no more than 14 calendar days after initiation of services. [...]”

    • Tag 1650: 144G.70 Subd. 4 (f) Service plan, implementation and revisions to Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the service plan included the required content for three of three residents (R1, R2, R3), with records reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the service plan included the required content for three of three residents (R1, R2, R3), with records reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(f) The service plan must include: (1) a description of the services to be provided, the fees for services, and the frequency of each service, according to the resident's current assessment and resident preferences; (2) the identification of staff or [...]”

    • Tag 1730: 144G.71 Subd. 5 Individualized medication management plan Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) developed an individualized medication management plan with the required content for three of three residents

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) developed an individualized medication management plan with the required content for three of three residents (R1, R2, R3), with records reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) For each resident receiving medication management services, the assisted living facility must prepare and include in the service plan a written statement of the medication management services that will be provided to the resident. [...]”

    • Tag 1760: 144G.71 Subd. 8 Documentation of administration of medication Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure medications were administered per providers orders for three of three residents (R1, R2, R3) with records reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure medications were administered per providers orders for three of three residents (R1, R2, R3) with records reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “Each medication administered by the assisted living facility staff must be documented in the resident's record. The documentation must include the signature and title of the person who administered the medication. [...]”

    • Tag 1880: 144G.71 Subd. 19 Storage of medications Level 2, pattern scope, scope/level letter E · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure medications were stored according to manufacturer directions by storing medications in a refrigerator that were indicated to be stored at room temperature, and failing to maintain a temperature log to ensure appropriate storage of refrigerated medications.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure medications were stored according to manufacturer directions by storing medications in a refrigerator that were indicated to be stored at room temperature, and failing to maintain a temperature log to ensure appropriate storage of refrigerated medications. This had the potential to affect eight (8) residents with medications stored in the refrigerator. [...]”

      Rule cited: “An assisted living facility must store all prescription medications in securely locked and substantially constructed compartments according to the manufacturer's directions and permit only authorized personnel to have access.”

    • Tag 1910: 144G.71 Subd. 22 Disposition of medications Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide documentation in the

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to provide documentation in the resident's record regarding the disposition of medication to include quantity and names of staff and other individuals involved in the disposition of medications for one of one discharged resident (R4) with record reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) Any current medications being managed by the assisted living facility must be provided to the resident when the resident's service plan ends or medication management services are no longer part of the service plan. [...]”

    • Tag 1940: 144G.72 Subd. 3 Individualized treatment or therapy managemen Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) developed a treatment management plan to include all required content for two of two residents (R1, R2) with treatment services records reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) developed a treatment management plan to include all required content for two of two residents (R1, R2) with treatment services records reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “For each resident receiving management of ordered or prescribed treatments or therapy services, the assisted living facility must prepare and include in the service plan a written statement of the treatment or therapy services that will be provided to the [...]”

    • Tag 2040: 144G.81 Subdivision 1 Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Fourteen (14) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide a complete hazard vulnerability or safety risk assessment plan to identify hazard vulnerabilities and mitigations on and around the property to protect the residents from potential harm.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, document review, and interview, the licensee failed to provide a complete hazard vulnerability or safety risk assessment plan to identify hazard vulnerabilities and mitigations on and around the property to protect the residents from potential harm. This has the potential to directly affect all memory care residents receiving assisted living services. [...]”

      Rule cited: “An assisted living facility with dementia care that has a secured dementia care unit must meet the requirements of section 144G.45 and the following additional requirements: (1) a hazard vulnerability assessment or safety risk must be performed on and around [...]”

    • Tag 2110: 144G.82 Subd. 3 Policies Level 2, pattern scope, scope/level letter E · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure policies and procedures for assisted living with dementia care were provided to residents and the residents' legal and designated representatives for three of three residents (R1, R2, R3) with records reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure policies and procedures for assisted living with dementia care were provided to residents and the residents' legal and designated representatives for three of three residents (R1, R2, R3) with records reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) In addition to the policies and procedures required in the licensing of all facilities, the assisted living facility with dementia care licensee must develop and implement policies and procedures that address the: (1) philosophy of how services are [...]”

    Total fines assessed, as printed in the letter: $500.00.

Substantiated investigations (state reports)

  • April 3, 2023 · report HL332604123M · MDH finding: Substantiated, individual responsibility
    Details

    Allegation, as written: “The alleged perpetrator (AP) abused a resident when the AP restrained the resident while assisting the resident with toileting, which resulted in multiple bruises and a laceration on the resident's hand.”

    “The Minnesota Department of Health determined abuse was substantiated.”

    “The AP was responsible for the maltreatment.”

    Summary: MDH looked into an allegation and found: abuse substantiated (individual responsibility).

    MDH’s conclusion, as written: “The Minnesota Department of Health determined abuse was substantiated. The AP was responsible for the maltreatment. A witness saw the AP grab the resident's arms and prevent the resident from moving her arms, which caused bruises and a skin tear.”

    Action taken by facility: “The facility began documentation of the resident's behaviors. The AP no longer works for the facility.”

    Action taken by MDH: “The facility was found to be in noncompliance.”

    Survey completed March 8, 2023: 2 correction orders

    • Tag 2310: 144G.91 Subd. 4 (a) Appropriate care and services Level 3, isolated scope, scope/level letter G · correction period: Seven (7) Days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure staff provided appropriate care and services individualized to the resident, related to behaviors for one of one resident (R1) reviewed for maltreatment.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and document review, the licensee failed to ensure staff provided appropriate care and services individualized to the resident, related to behaviors for one of one resident (R1) reviewed for maltreatment. Unlicensed personnel (ULP)-H grabbed R1's arms while toileting the resident and R1 was striking out. R1 received bruises and a skin tear. In another incident, ULP-I left R1 sleeping on the floor on a fall mat for four hours after R1 got out of bed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) Residents have the right to care and assisted living services that are appropriate based on the resident's needs and according to an up-to-date service plan subject to accepted health care standards.”

    • Tag 2360: 144G.91 Subd. 8 Freedom from maltreatment
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the facility failed to ensure one of one resident(s) reviewed (R1) was free from maltreatment.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “The facility failed to ensure one of one resident(s) reviewed (R1) was free from maltreatment. Findings include: The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) issued a determination maltreatment occurred, and an individual was responsible for the maltreatment, in connection with incidents which occurred at the facility. Please refer to the public maltreatment report for details.”

      Rule cited: “Residents have the right to be free from physical, sexual, and emotional abuse; neglect; financial exploitation; and all forms of maltreatment covered under the Vulnerable Adults Act.”

  • November 17, 2021 · report HL33260001C
Unsubstantiated investigations (1)
  • October 8, 2025 · report HL332607689C
    Details

    Survey completed September 11, 2025: no correction orders issued.

What the levels and scopes mean (MDH’s words)

Level 1: “a violation that has no potential to cause more than a minimal impact on the resident and does not affect health or safety”

Level 2: “a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death”

Level 3: “a violation that harmed a resident's health or safety, not including serious injury, impairment, or death, or a violation that has the potential to lead to serious injury, impairment, or death”

Level 4: “a violation harmed a resident's health or safety, not including serious injury or death, or a violation that was likely to lead to serious injury or death”

Isolated scope: “when one or a limited number of residents are affected or one or a limited number of staff are involved, or the situation has occurred only occasionally”

Pattern scope: “when more than a limited number of residents are affected, more than a limited number of staff are involved, or the situation has occurred repeatedly; but is not found to be pervasive”

Widespread scope: “when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has affected or has the potential to affect a large portion or all of the residents”

Summaries are ours and are marked “Summary”; quoted text is MDH’s own, shortened where marked [...]. Read the full reports at the links above or search every report on MDH’s site.

What these terms mean

MDH: “An evaluation is a process regulated by the division to ensure licensees comply with the laws, rules, and certifications for the type of care and services authorized under their license/certification.”

“An investigation may occur when the division is notified that care and services are not being provided by licensees as required by law. This may include allegations of abuse, neglect, or financial misuse.”

For maltreatment, Minnesota law defines substantiated as “a preponderance of the evidence shows that an act that meets the definition of maltreatment occurred” and inconclusive as “less than a preponderance of evidence to show that maltreatment did or did not occur” (Minn. Stat. 626.5572).

Correction orders, as MDH explains on each state form: “Tag numbers have been assigned to Minnesota State Statutes for Assisted Living Facilities.” “The letter in the left column is used for tracking purposes and reflects the scope and level issued pursuant to 144G.31 subd. 1, 2, and 3.” MDH adds that there is no requirement to submit a plan of correction for violations of Minnesota state statutes.

MDH keeps investigation results for seven years when allegations are substantiated, four years when inconclusive, and three years when unsubstantiated, so the counts cover different periods. This community is licensed for 32 residents; larger communities are evaluated and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division, data as of September 28, 2026. Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.

License and ownershipActive license, licensee SUITE LIVING SENIOR CARE OF VADNAIS
License type
Assisted Living Facility Dementia Care
License number
425765
License status
Active
Current license dated
2026-07-01
Licensed capacity
32
Licensee
SUITE LIVING SENIOR CARE OF VADNAIS
Administrator/Authorized Agent
Audrey McElwain

Source: Minnesota state licensing records (agency listing), retrieved 2026-09-09. Licensing status is a matter of public record; it is not a quality rating.

Administrator/Authorized Agent name from the Minnesota licensing record, as of Sep 9, 2026.

Paying with Medicaid and other programsHow Medicaid pays for care in Minnesota, and other programs

How Medicaid pays for care in Minnesota

  • Elderly Waiver (EW), customized living services. Minnesota's Elderly Waiver, part of Medical Assistance (Minnesota Medicaid), can pay for "customized living" services, and a provider of those services must hold an assisted living license (or meet certain exceptions). You must qualify for Medical Assistance and need a nursing-home level of care. (state page)

Ask the community whether it accepts Medicaid.

Questions to ask on a tour10 questions picked for this community from its record

Picked for this community from its record. Ask them in person and write down the answers.

  1. The current license dates from 2026. Has the owner or operator changed recently?
  2. What does the base rate include, and when did rates last go up?
  3. How many caregivers work in memory care during the day, the evening and overnight, and for how many residents?
  4. What dementia training does each caregiver get before working alone, and every year after?
  5. How do staff respond when a resident is agitated, frightened or tries to leave?
  6. How many caregivers are on duty during the day and at night?
  7. What happens if care needs increase? When would someone need to move?
  8. What fees are charged at move-in?
  9. How do you tell families about falls, illness or changes?
  10. How long have the executive director and the head of care been here?
What we checked7 public sources we searched, with dates

Every public source we searched for this community. “Nothing on record” means we found no record that matched it. A record can be missed when a name or address differs.

SourceData as ofWhat we found
Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division inspection recordsSep 28, 2026See above
U.S. Department of Labor wage and hour casesOct 15, 2026Nothing on record
OSHA workplace safety inspections since 2016Oct 15, 2026Nothing on record
HUD Multifamily Properties - AssistedJul 6, 2026Nothing on record
State Veterans Homes (NASVH directory)Sep 20, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Hospice - General InformationAug 19, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Home Health Care AgenciesMay 27, 2026Nothing on record
Common questionsAnswers to 4 questions families ask
What type of care does Suite Living Senior Care of VA provide?

Suite Living Senior Care of VA is licensed by the state of Minnesota for assisted living, memory care in Vadnais Heights, Minnesota. Its licensed capacity is 32 residents.

Does Lilisity rate Suite Living Senior Care of VA?

No. We publish state licensing details for Suite Living Senior Care of VA but no score, rating, or ranking. Only communities on the Top Communities list or with a Senior Living Alliance Excellence Award, both based on phone-verified resident and family interviews, are ranked.

How much does Suite Living Senior Care of VA cost?

Assisted Living in Minnesota typically starts at $2,200 to $4,800 a month. Based on 74 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price. Suite Living Senior Care of VA does not publish its prices.

How do I contact Suite Living Senior Care of VA?

Visit Suite Living Senior Care of VA at 580 Liberty Way, Vadnais Heights, MN 55127.

Choosing assisted livingOur care guide: what to look for, what it costs, how families pay, and more questions to ask (PDF)

Report a wrong fact

How Lilisity works. The only scores or rankings Lilisity publishes are the Top Communities list and the Excellence Awards, both built from phone-verified resident and family interviews. Communities can pay Lilisity a flat monthly fee to manage their own listing: photos, prices, contact details, and receiving the inquiries families choose to send them. The fee is the same no matter how many families contact them or move in. Senior Living Alliance, which runs Lilisity, offers the same listing to its member communities as part of their membership; members pay SLA for its resident and family interview program. No community pays Lilisity per inquiry, per referral or per move-in. Payment never changes a testimonial, a rating, or the order of search results. The "Nearby Senior Living Alliance communities" box shows member communities only. How we verify testimonials · How we are paid