Lilisity

Assisted Living

Stanton House With Services

3354 James Avenue North, Minneapolis, MN 55412 · Map
Licensed for 4 residents · STANTON HOUSE WITH SERVICES

State license active
Is this your community? Claim this listing

Stanton House With Services is a state-licensed assisted living community in Minneapolis, Minnesota. It is licensed for 4 residents. Lilisity publishes no score or ranking for this community; the details below come from the state licensing record.

Assisted LivingCare offered
4 residentsLicensed capacity
State licensedAssisted living facility
$2,500 to $4,400/moTypical assisted living start in Hennepin County, from 18 communities that publish prices

Prices

This community does not publish its prices.

Area costs

Assisted Living in Hennepin County typically starts at $2,500 to $4,400 a month. Based on 18 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price.

Lilisity’s independent report

What the public record shows

Gathered by Lilisity from state and federal sources. Communities can’t edit this part of the page.

State inspections

0Substantiated investigations

Last evaluation: Mar 17, 2026. See the record

License

Active, 4 residents

Assisted Living Facility 426111, current license dated Jul 1, 2026. Licensee STANTON HOUSE WITH SERVICES.

Nearest emergency room

2.0 miles

North Memorial Health Hospital, rated 1 of 5 stars by CMS.

Side by side with nearby communities

The 4 nearest communities that offer assisted living, by straight-line distance. Prices are starting prices each community publishes; we never show estimates.

CommunityDistanceLicensed capacityPublished starting priceLicenseInspection citations
Stanton House With Services this community4Not publishedActive0 substantiated
Stanton House W Services, James Avenue North0.0 mi5Not publishedActive0 substantiated
Hope Assisted Living0.1 mi4Not publishedActive0 substantiated
Twin Cities Assisted Living in, James Avenue North0.2 mi5Not publishedActive0 substantiated
Grace Group Home0.3 mi5Not publishedActive0 substantiated
State inspection record0 substantiated
Last evaluation
March 17, 2026
Evaluations on record
2
Investigations substantiated
0 kept 7 years
Inconclusive
0 kept 4 years
Unsubstantiated
0 kept 3 years

Most recent evaluation (March 17, 2026, state report C0NO11)

MDH: “On March 16, 2026, through March 17, 2026, the Minnesota Department of Health conducted a full survey at the above provider and the following correction orders are issued.”

Survey completed March 17, 2026: 19 correction orders

  • Tag 340: 144G.30 Subd. 5 Correction orders Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days · fine: $500.00 assessed
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop and execute a plan of correction (POC) for correction orders related to 144G.41 Subd. 3.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to develop and execute a plan of correction (POC) for correction orders related to 144G.41 Subd. 3. Infection control program and 144G.70 Subd. 2. (c-f) for initial reviews, assessments, and monitoring, which were both issued following their previous routine survey conducted November 13, 2023, through November 15, 2023. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) A correction order may be issued whenever the commissioner finds upon survey or during a complaint investigation that a facility, a managerial official, an agent of the facility, or staff of the facility is not in compliance with this chapter. [...]”

  • Tag 470: 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Minimum requirements Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop a staffing plan that contained required content and failed to ensure it was updated twice per year.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to develop a staffing plan that contained required content and failed to ensure it was updated twice per year. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(11) develop and implement a staffing plan for determining its staffing level that: (i) includes an evaluation, to be conducted at least twice a year, of the appropriateness of staffing levels in the facility; (ii) ensures sufficient staffing at all times to [...]”

  • Tag 480: 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Subd. 1a (a-b) Minimum requirements; required food services Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Please refer to the FBEIR for any compliance dates
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code. This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death) and was issued at a widespread scope (when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b), food must be prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code, Minnesota Rules, chapter 4626. [...]”

  • Tag 485: 144G.41 Subdivision 1.a (a) Minimum requirements; required food services Level 1, widespread scope, scope/level letter C · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide a menu a week in advance and inform residents in advance of menu changes.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to provide a menu a week in advance and inform residents in advance of menu changes. This practice resulted in a level one violation (a violation that will cause only minimal impact on the residents and does not affect health or safety) and was issued at a widespread scope (when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has affected or has the potential to affect a large portion or all the residents). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) All assisted living facilities must offer to provide or make available at least three nutritious meals daily with snacks available seven days per week, according to the recommended dietary allowances in the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) [...]”

  • Tag 510: 144G.41 Subd. 3 Infection control program Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Two (2) days · fine: $500.00 assessed
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to establish and maintain an infection control program that complied with accepted health care or medical and nursing standards for infection control related to hand hygiene.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to establish and maintain an infection control program that complied with accepted health care or medical and nursing standards for infection control related to hand hygiene. The deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents, employees, and visitors. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) All assisted living facilities must establish and maintain an infection control program that complies with accepted health care, medical, and nursing standards for infection control. [...]”

Show all 19
  • Tag 550: 144G.41 Subd. 7 Resident grievances; reporting maltreatment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to post information directing individuals to the Office of Health Facility Complaints (OHFC) at the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) if they had complaints about the facility or person providing services.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to post information directing individuals to the Office of Health Facility Complaints (OHFC) at the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) if they had complaints about the facility or person providing services. [...]”

    Rule cited: “All facilities must post in a conspicuous place information about the facilities' grievance procedure, and the name, telephone number, and email contact information for the individuals who are responsible for handling resident grievances. [...]”

  • Tag 640: 144G.42 Subd. 7 Posting information for reporting suspected c Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to post the 911 emergency phone number near the facility house phone.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to post the 911 emergency phone number near the facility house phone. This had the potential to affect all residents, staff, and visitors at the facility. [...]”

    Rule cited: “The facility shall support protection and safety through access to the state's systems for reporting suspected criminal activity and suspected vulnerable adult maltreatment by: (1) posting the 911 emergency number in common areas and near telephones provided [...]”

  • Tag 680: 144G.42 Subd. 10 Disaster planning and emergency preparedness Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop a written emergency preparedness plan (EPP) with all the required content for staff, residents, and visitors to view.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to develop a written emergency preparedness plan (EPP) with all the required content for staff, residents, and visitors to view. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) The facility must meet the following requirements: (1) have a written emergency disaster plan that contains a plan for evacuation, addresses elements of sheltering in place, identifies temporary relocation sites, and details staff assignments in the event [...]”

  • Tag 775: 144G.45 Subd. 2. (a) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days · fine: $500.00 assessed
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the physical environment of the facility was maintained in compliance with the requirements of Minnesota Statute 144G.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the physical environment of the facility was maintained in compliance with the requirements of Minnesota Statute 144G. [...]”

    Rule cited: “Each assisted living facility must comply with the State Fire Code in Minnesota Rules, chapter 7511, and:”

  • Tag 780: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (1) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days · fine: $500.00 assessed
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the physical environment of the facility was maintained in compliance with the requirements of Minnesota Statute 144G.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the physical environment of the facility was maintained in compliance with the requirements of Minnesota Statute 144G. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) Each assisted living facility must comply with the State Fire Code in Minnesota Rules, chapter 7511, and: (1) for dwellings or sleeping units, as defined in the State Fire Code: (i) provide smoke alarms in each room used for sleeping purposes; (ii) [...]”

  • Tag 790: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (2-3) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the physical environment of the facility was maintained in compliance with the requirements of Minnesota Statute 144G.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the physical environment of the facility was maintained in compliance with the requirements of Minnesota Statute 144G. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(2) install and maintain portable fire extinguishers in accordance with the State Fire Code; (3) install portable fire extinguishers having a minimum 2-A:10-B:C rating within Group R-3 occupancies, as defined by the State Fire Code, located so that the travel [...]”

  • Tag 800: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (4) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the physical environment of the facility was maintained in compliance with the requirements of Minnesota Statute 144G.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the physical environment of the facility was maintained in compliance with the requirements of Minnesota Statute 144G. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(4) keep the physical environment, including walls, floors, ceiling, all furnishings, grounds, systems, and equipment in a continuous state of good repair and operation with regard to the health, safety, comfort, and well-being of the residents in accordance [...]”

  • Tag 810: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (b-f) Fire protection and physical environment Level 3, widespread scope, scope/level letter I · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days · fine: $1,000.00 assessed
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the physical environment of the facility was maintained in compliance with the requirements of Minnesota Statute 144G.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the physical environment of the facility was maintained in compliance with the requirements of Minnesota Statute 144G. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(b) Each assisted living facility shall develop and maintain fire safety and evacuation plans. [...]”

  • Tag 900: 144G.50 Subdivision 1 Contract required Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to execute a written contract on or before the date of admission with the required content for one of three residents (R2).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to execute a written contract on or before the date of admission with the required content for one of three residents (R2). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) An assisted living facility may not offer or provide housing or assisted living services to any individual unless it has executed a written contract with the resident. [...]”

  • Tag 1060: 144G.52 Subd. 9 Emergency relocation Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide a written notice with the required content for an emergency relocation to the resident, legal representative, or designated representative and failed to provide the notification to the Office of Ombudsman for Long-Term Care (OOLTC) of the emergency relocation greater than four days for one of one resident (R4).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to provide a written notice with the required content for an emergency relocation to the resident, legal representative, or designated representative and failed to provide the notification to the Office of Ombudsman for Long-Term Care (OOLTC) of the emergency relocation greater than four days for one of one resident (R4). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) A facility may remove a resident from the facility in an emergency if necessary due to a resident's urgent medical needs or an imminent risk the resident poses to the health or safety of another facility resident or facility staff member. [...]”

  • Tag 1610: 144G.70 Subd. 2 (a-b) Initial reviews, assessments, and monitoring Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) completed an initial comprehensive nursing assessment on, or before, the date of admission for two of two residents (R2, R4).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) completed an initial comprehensive nursing assessment on, or before, the date of admission for two of two residents (R2, R4). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) Residents who are not receiving any assisted living services shall not be required to undergo an initial nursing assessment. [...]”

  • Tag 1620: 144G.70 Subd. 2 (c-e) Initial reviews, assessments, and monitoring Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) conducted a comprehensive assessment within 14 days after admission for one of two residents (R2).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) conducted a comprehensive assessment within 14 days after admission for one of two residents (R2). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) Residents who are not receiving any assisted living services shall not be required to undergo an initial nursing assessment. [...]”

  • Tag 1630: 144G.70 Subd. 3 Temporary service plan Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to complete a temporary service plan as required at the time of admission for one of three residents (R2).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to complete a temporary service plan as required at the time of admission for one of three residents (R2). [...]”

    Rule cited: “When a facility initiates services and the individualized assessment required in subdivision 2 has not been completed, the facility must complete a temporary plan and agreement with the resident for services. [...]”

  • Tag 1640: 144G.70 Subd. 4 (a-e) Service plan, implementation and revisions to Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to revise and obtain a resident or resident representative's signature documenting a change of services to be provided for one of two residents (R1).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to revise and obtain a resident or resident representative's signature documenting a change of services to be provided for one of two residents (R1). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) No later than 14 calendar days after the date that services are first provided, an assisted living facility shall finalize a current written service plan. [...]”

From MDH’s letter: the letter says the facility is in substantial compliance.

Food and beverage inspection (included in this report): Food and beverage inspection report included

Fines assessed by MDH

  • Tag 340 (144g.30 Subd. 5 - Correction Orders): $500.00
  • Tag 510 (144g.41 Subd. 3 - Infection Control Program): $500.00
  • Tag 775 (144g.45 Subd. 2. (a) - Fire Protection And Physical Environment): $500.00
  • Tag 780 (144g.45 Subd. 2 (a) (1) - Fire Protection And Physical Environment): $500.00
  • Tag 810 (144g.45 Subd. 2 (b-F) - Fire Protection And Physical Environment): $1,000.00

Total fines assessed, as printed in the letter: $3,000.00.

Earlier evaluations (1)
  • November 15, 2023: report CUD911 · 79 correction orders
    Details

    Survey completed September 30, 2024: 18 correction orders

    • Tag 480: 144G.41 Subd 1 (13) (i) (B) Minimum requirements (re-issued) scope/level letter F
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “No further action needed.”

      Rule cited: “(13) offer to provide or make available at least the following services to residents: (B) food must be prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code, Minnesota Rules, chapter 4626; and”

    • Tag 490: 144G.41 Subd 1 (13) (ii)-(vii) Minimum requirements (re-issued) scope/level letter F
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “No further action needed.”

      Rule cited: “(iv) upon the request of the resident, provide direct or reasonable assistance with arranging for transportation to medical and social services appointments, shopping, and other recreation, and provide the name of or other identifying information about the [...]”

    • Tag 510: 144G.41 Subd. 3 Infection control program (re-issued) scope/level letter D
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “No further action needed.”

      Rule cited: “(a) All assisted living facilities must establish and maintain an infection control program that complies with accepted health care, medical, and nursing standards for infection control. [...]”

    • Tag 620: 144G.42 Subd. 6 (a) / 626.557, Subd. 3 Compliance with requirements for reporting ma (re-issued) scope/level letter D
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “No further action needed.”

      Rule cited: “(a) The assisted living facility must comply with the requirements for the reporting of maltreatment of vulnerable adults in section 626.557. [...]”

    • Tag 730: 144G.43 Subd. 3 Contents of resident record (re-issued) scope/level letter D
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “No further action needed.”

      Rule cited: “Contents of a resident record include the following for each resident: (1) identifying information, including the resident's name, date of birth, address, and telephone number; (2) the name, address, and telephone number of the resident's emergency contact, [...]”

    Show all 18
    • Tag 820: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (g) Fire protection and physical environment (re-issued) Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · fine: $3,000.00 assessed
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide facilities that were not a distinct hazard to life.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to provide facilities that were not a distinct hazard to life. This had the potential to affect a limited number of residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(g) Existing construction or elements, including assisted living facilities that were registered as housing with services establishments under chapter 144D prior to August 1, 2021, shall be permitted to continue in use provided such use does not constitute a [...]”

    • Tag 970: 144G.50 Subd. 5 Waivers of liability prohibited (re-issued) scope/level letter C
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “No further action needed.”

      Rule cited: “The contract must not include a waiver of facility liability for the health and safety or personal property of a resident. [...]”

    • Tag 1440: 144G.62 Subd. 4 Supervision of staff providing delegated nurs (re-issued) scope/level letter F
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “No further action needed.”

      Rule cited: “(a) Staff who perform delegated nursing or therapy tasks must be supervised by an appropriate licensed health professional or a registered nurse according to the assisted living facility's policy where the services are being provided to verify that the work [...]”

    • Tag 1470: 144G.63 Subd. 2 Content of required orientation (re-issued) scope/level letter F
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “No further action needed.”

      Rule cited: “(a) The orientation must contain the following topics: (1) an overview of this chapter; (2) an introduction and review of the facility's policies and procedures related to the provision of assisted living services by the individual staff person; (3) handling [...]”

    • Tag 1530: 144G.64 TRAINING IN DEMENTIA CARE REQUIRED (re-issued) scope/level letter F
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “No further action needed.”

      Rule cited: “(a) All assisted living facilities must meet the following training requirements: (1) supervisors of direct-care staff must have at least eight hours of initial training on topics specified under paragraph (b) within 120 working hours of the employment start [...]”

    • Tag 1620: 144G.70 Subd. 2 (c-e) Initial reviews, assessments, and monitoring (re-issued) scope/level letter F
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “No further action needed.”

      Rule cited: “(c) Resident reassessment and monitoring must be conducted no more than 14 calendar days after initiation of services. [...]”

    • Tag 1760: 144G.71 Subd. 8 Documentation of administration of medication (re-issued) scope/level letter D
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “No further action needed.”

      Rule cited: “Each medication administered by the assisted living facility staff must be documented in the resident's record. The documentation must include the signature and title of the person who administered the medication. [...]”

    • Tag 1790: 144G.71 Subd. 10 Medication management for residents who will (re-issued) scope/level letter F
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “No further action needed.”

      Rule cited: “(2) for unplanned time away, when the pharmacy is not able to provide the medications, a licensed nurse or unlicensed personnel shall provide medications in amounts and dosages needed for the length of the anticipated absence, not to exceed seven calendar [...]”

    • Tag 1940: 144G.72 Subd. 3 Individualized treatment or therapy managemen (re-issued) scope/level letter D
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “No further action needed.”

      Rule cited: “For each resident receiving management of ordered or prescribed treatments or therapy services, the assisted living facility must prepare and include in the service plan a written statement of the treatment or therapy services that will be provided to the [...]”

    • Tag 1950: 144G.72 Subd. 4 Administration of treatments and therapy (re-issued) scope/level letter D
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “No further action needed.”

      Rule cited: “Ordered or prescribed treatments or therapies must be administered by a nurse, physician, or other licensed health professional authorized to perform the treatment or therapy, or may be delegated or assigned to unlicensed personnel by the licensed health [...]”

    • Tag 1960: 144G.72 Subd. 5 Documentation of administration of treatments (re-issued) scope/level letter D
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “No further action needed.”

      Rule cited: “Each treatment or therapy administered by an assisted living facility must be in the resident record. [...]”

    • Tag 2310: 144G.91 Subd. 4 (a) Appropriate care and services (re-issued) scope/level letter D
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “No further action needed.”

      Rule cited: “(a) Residents have the right to care and assisted living services that are appropriate based on the resident's needs and according to an up-to-date service plan subject to accepted health care standards.”

    • Tag 3090: 144.6502, Subd. 8 Notice to Visitors (re-issued) scope/level letter C
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “No further action needed.”

      Rule cited: “(a) A facility must post a sign at each facility entrance accessible to visitors that states: "Electronic monitoring devices, including security cameras and audio devices, may be present to record persons and activities." (b) The facility is responsible for [...]”

    Survey completed June 25, 2024: 18 correction orders

    • Tag 480: 144G.41 Subd 1 (13) (i) (B) Minimum requirements (re-issued) scope/level letter F
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “No further action needed.”

      Rule cited: “(13) offer to provide or make available at least the following services to residents: (B) food must be prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code, Minnesota Rules, chapter 4626; and”

    • Tag 490: 144G.41 Subd 1 (13) (ii)-(vii) Minimum requirements (re-issued) scope/level letter F
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “No further action needed.”

      Rule cited: “(iv) upon the request of the resident, provide direct or reasonable assistance with arranging for transportation to medical and social services appointments, shopping, and other recreation, and provide the name of or other identifying information about the [...]”

    • Tag 510: 144G.41 Subd. 3 Infection control program (re-issued) scope/level letter D
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “No further action needed.”

      Rule cited: “(a) All assisted living facilities must establish and maintain an infection control program that complies with accepted health care, medical, and nursing standards for infection control. [...]”

    • Tag 620: 144G.42 Subd. 6 (a) / 626.557, Subd. 3 Compliance with requirements for reporting ma (re-issued) scope/level letter D
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “No further action needed.”

      Rule cited: “(a) The assisted living facility must comply with the requirements for the reporting of maltreatment of vulnerable adults in section 626.557. [...]”

    • Tag 730: 144G.43 Subd. 3 Contents of resident record (re-issued) scope/level letter D
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “No further action needed.”

      Rule cited: “Contents of a resident record include the following for each resident: (1) identifying information, including the resident's name, date of birth, address, and telephone number; (2) the name, address, and telephone number of the resident's emergency contact, [...]”

    Show all 18
    • Tag 820: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (g) Fire protection and physical environment (re-issued) Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · fine: $3,000.00 assessed
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide facilities that were not a distinct hazard to life.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to provide facilities that were not a distinct hazard to life. This had the potential to affect a limited number of residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(g) Existing construction or elements, including assisted living facilities that were registered as housing with services establishments under chapter 144D prior to August 1, 2021, shall be permitted to continue in use provided such use does not constitute a [...]”

    • Tag 970: 144G.50 Subd. 5 Waivers of liability prohibited (re-issued) scope/level letter C
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “No further action needed.”

      Rule cited: “The contract must not include a waiver of facility liability for the health and safety or personal property of a resident. [...]”

    • Tag 1440: 144G.62 Subd. 4 Supervision of staff providing delegated nurs (re-issued) scope/level letter F
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “No further action needed.”

      Rule cited: “(a) Staff who perform delegated nursing or therapy tasks must be supervised by an appropriate licensed health professional or a registered nurse according to the assisted living facility's policy where the services are being provided to verify that the work [...]”

    • Tag 1470: 144G.63 Subd. 2 Content of required orientation (re-issued) scope/level letter F
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “No further action needed.”

      Rule cited: “(a) The orientation must contain the following topics: (1) an overview of this chapter; (2) an introduction and review of the facility's policies and procedures related to the provision of assisted living services by the individual staff person; (3) handling [...]”

    • Tag 1530: 144G.64 TRAINING IN DEMENTIA CARE REQUIRED (re-issued) scope/level letter F
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “No further action needed.”

      Rule cited: “(a) All assisted living facilities must meet the following training requirements: (1) supervisors of direct-care staff must have at least eight hours of initial training on topics specified under paragraph (b) within 120 working hours of the employment start [...]”

    • Tag 1620: 144G.70 Subd. 2 (c-e) Initial reviews, assessments, and monitoring (re-issued) scope/level letter F
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “No further action needed.”

      Rule cited: “(c) Resident reassessment and monitoring must be conducted no more than 14 calendar days after initiation of services. [...]”

    • Tag 1760: 144G.71 Subd. 8 Documentation of administration of medication (re-issued) scope/level letter D
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “No further action needed.”

      Rule cited: “Each medication administered by the assisted living facility staff must be documented in the resident's record. The documentation must include the signature and title of the person who administered the medication. [...]”

    • Tag 1790: 144G.71 Subd. 10 Medication management for residents who will (re-issued) scope/level letter F
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “No further action needed.”

      Rule cited: “(2) for unplanned time away, when the pharmacy is not able to provide the medications, a licensed nurse or unlicensed personnel shall provide medications in amounts and dosages needed for the length of the anticipated absence, not to exceed seven calendar [...]”

    • Tag 1940: 144G.72 Subd. 3 Individualized treatment or therapy managemen (re-issued) scope/level letter D
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “No further action needed.”

      Rule cited: “For each resident receiving management of ordered or prescribed treatments or therapy services, the assisted living facility must prepare and include in the service plan a written statement of the treatment or therapy services that will be provided to the [...]”

    • Tag 1950: 144G.72 Subd. 4 Administration of treatments and therapy (re-issued) scope/level letter D
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “No further action needed.”

      Rule cited: “Ordered or prescribed treatments or therapies must be administered by a nurse, physician, or other licensed health professional authorized to perform the treatment or therapy, or may be delegated or assigned to unlicensed personnel by the licensed health [...]”

    • Tag 1960: 144G.72 Subd. 5 Documentation of administration of treatments (re-issued) scope/level letter D
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “No further action needed.”

      Rule cited: “Each treatment or therapy administered by an assisted living facility must be in the resident record. [...]”

    • Tag 2310: 144G.91 Subd. 4 (a) Appropriate care and services (re-issued) scope/level letter D
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “No further action needed.”

      Rule cited: “(a) Residents have the right to care and assisted living services that are appropriate based on the resident's needs and according to an up-to-date service plan subject to accepted health care standards.”

    • Tag 3090: 144.6502, Subd. 8 Notice to Visitors (re-issued) scope/level letter C
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “No further action needed.”

      Rule cited: “(a) A facility must post a sign at each facility entrance accessible to visitors that states: "Electronic monitoring devices, including security cameras and audio devices, may be present to record persons and activities." (b) The facility is responsible for [...]”

    Survey completed February 5, 2024: 21 correction orders

    • Tag 480: 144G.41 Subd 1 (13) (i) (B) Minimum requirements (re-issued) scope/level letter F
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “No further action needed.”

      Rule cited: “(13) offer to provide or make available at least the following services to residents: (B) food must be prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code, Minnesota Rules, chapter 4626; and”

    • Tag 490: 144G.41 Subd 1 (13) (ii)-(vii) Minimum requirements (re-issued) scope/level letter F
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “No further action needed.”

      Rule cited: “(iv) upon the request of the resident, provide direct or reasonable assistance with arranging for transportation to medical and social services appointments, shopping, and other recreation, and provide the name of or other identifying information about the [...]”

    • Tag 510: 144G.41 Subd. 3 Infection control program (re-issued) scope/level letter D
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “No further action needed.”

      Rule cited: “(a) All assisted living facilities must establish and maintain an infection control program that complies with accepted health care, medical, and nursing standards for infection control. [...]”

    • Tag 620: 144G.42 Subd. 6 (a) / 626.557, Subd. 3 Compliance with requirements for reporting ma (re-issued) scope/level letter D
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “No further action needed.”

      Rule cited: “(a) The assisted living facility must comply with the requirements for the reporting of maltreatment of vulnerable adults in section 626.557. [...]”

    • Tag 730: 144G.43 Subd. 3 Contents of resident record (re-issued) scope/level letter D
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “No further action needed.”

      Rule cited: “Contents of a resident record include the following for each resident: (1) identifying information, including the resident's name, date of birth, address, and telephone number; (2) the name, address, and telephone number of the resident's emergency contact, [...]”

    Show all 21
    • Tag 780: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (1) Fire protection and physical environment (re-issued) Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · fine: $500.00 assessed
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide interconnected smoke alarms as required throughout the facility.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to provide interconnected smoke alarms as required throughout the facility. This deficient condition had the ability to affect all staff, visitors, and residents. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) Each assisted living facility must comply with the State Fire Code in Minnesota Rules, chapter 7511, and: (1) for dwellings or sleeping units, as defined in the State Fire Code: (i) provide smoke alarms in each room used for sleeping purposes; (ii) [...]”

    • Tag 800: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (4) Fire protection and physical environment (re-issued) Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · fine: $500.00 assessed
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to maintain the facility's physical environment in a continuous state of good repair and operation regarding the health, safety, and well-being of the residents.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to maintain the facility's physical environment in a continuous state of good repair and operation regarding the health, safety, and well-being of the residents. This had the potential to directly affect all residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(4) keep the physical environment, including walls, floors, ceiling, all furnishings, grounds, systems, and equipment in a continuous state of good repair and operation with regard to the health, safety, comfort, and well-being of the residents in accordance [...]”

    • Tag 810: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (b)-(f) Fire protection and physical environment (re-issued) scope/level letter F
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “No further action needed.”

      Rule cited: “(b) Each assisted living facility shall develop and maintain fire safety and evacuation plans. [...]”

    • Tag 820: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (g) Fire protection and physical environment (re-issued) Level 3, widespread scope, scope/level letter I · fine: $3,000.00 assessed
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide facilities that were not a distinct hazard to life.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to provide facilities that were not a distinct hazard to life. This had the potential to directly affect all residents and staff. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(g) Existing construction or elements, including assisted living facilities that were registered as housing with services establishments under chapter 144D prior to August 1, 2021, shall be permitted to continue in use provided such use does not constitute a [...]”

    • Tag 970: 144G.50 Subd. 5 Waivers of liability prohibited (re-issued) scope/level letter C
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “No further action needed.”

      Rule cited: “The contract must not include a waiver of facility liability for the health and safety or personal property of a resident. [...]”

    • Tag 1440: 144G.62 Subd. 4 Supervision of staff providing delegated nurs (re-issued) scope/level letter F
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “No further action needed.”

      Rule cited: “(a) Staff who perform delegated nursing or therapy tasks must be supervised by an appropriate licensed health professional or a registered nurse according to the assisted living facility's policy where the services are being provided to verify that the work [...]”

    • Tag 1470: 144G.63 Subd. 2 Content of required orientation (re-issued) scope/level letter F
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “No further action needed.”

      Rule cited: “(a) The orientation must contain the following topics: (1) an overview of this chapter; (2) an introduction and review of the facility's policies and procedures related to the provision of assisted living services by the individual staff person; (3) handling [...]”

    • Tag 1530: 144G.64 TRAINING IN DEMENTIA CARE REQUIRED (re-issued) scope/level letter F
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “No further action needed.”

      Rule cited: “(a) All assisted living facilities must meet the following training requirements: (1) supervisors of direct-care staff must have at least eight hours of initial training on topics specified under paragraph (b) within 120 working hours of the employment start [...]”

    • Tag 1620: 144G.70 Subd. 2 (c-e) Initial reviews, assessments, and monitoring (re-issued) scope/level letter F
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “No further action needed.”

      Rule cited: “(c) Resident reassessment and monitoring must be conducted no more than 14 calendar days after initiation of services. [...]”

    • Tag 1760: 144G.71 Subd. 8 Documentation of administration of medication (re-issued) scope/level letter D
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “No further action needed.”

      Rule cited: “Each medication administered by the assisted living facility staff must be documented in the resident's record. The documentation must include the signature and title of the person who administered the medication. [...]”

    • Tag 1790: 144G.71 Subd. 10 Medication management for residents who will (re-issued) scope/level letter F
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “No further action needed.”

      Rule cited: “(2) for unplanned time away, when the pharmacy is not able to provide the medications, a licensed nurse or unlicensed personnel shall provide medications in amounts and dosages needed for the length of the anticipated absence, not to exceed seven calendar [...]”

    • Tag 1940: 144G.72 Subd. 3 Individualized treatment or therapy managemen (re-issued) scope/level letter D
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “No further action needed.”

      Rule cited: “For each resident receiving management of ordered or prescribed treatments or therapy services, the assisted living facility must prepare and include in the service plan a written statement of the treatment or therapy services that will be provided to the [...]”

    • Tag 1950: 144G.72 Subd. 4 Administration of treatments and therapy (re-issued) scope/level letter D
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “No further action needed.”

      Rule cited: “Ordered or prescribed treatments or therapies must be administered by a nurse, physician, or other licensed health professional authorized to perform the treatment or therapy, or may be delegated or assigned to unlicensed personnel by the licensed health [...]”

    • Tag 1960: 144G.72 Subd. 5 Documentation of administration of treatments (re-issued) scope/level letter D
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “No further action needed.”

      Rule cited: “Each treatment or therapy administered by an assisted living facility must be in the resident record. [...]”

    • Tag 2310: 144G.91 Subd. 4 (a) Appropriate care and services (re-issued) scope/level letter D
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “No further action needed.”

      Rule cited: “(a) Residents have the right to care and assisted living services that are appropriate based on the resident's needs and according to an up-to-date service plan subject to accepted health care standards.”

    • Tag 3090: 144.6502, Subd. 8 Notice to Visitors (re-issued) scope/level letter C
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “No further action needed.”

      Rule cited: “(a) A facility must post a sign at each facility entrance accessible to visitors that states: "Electronic monitoring devices, including security cameras and audio devices, may be present to record persons and activities." (b) The facility is responsible for [...]”

    Survey completed November 15, 2023: 22 correction orders

    • Tag 480: 144G.41 Subd 1 (13) (i) (B) Minimum requirements Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Please refer to the FBEIR for any compliance dates
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code. This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety) and was issued at a widespread scope (when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has affected or has the potential to affect a large portion or all the [...]”

      Rule cited: “(13) offer to provide or make available at least the following services to residents: (B) food must be prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code, Minnesota Rules, chapter 4626; and”

    • Tag 490: 144G.41 Subd 1 (13) (ii)-(vii) Minimum requirements Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to have daily programs of social and recreational activities based on individual and group interests, physical, mental, and psychosocial needs, that create opportunities for active participation in the community at large.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to have daily programs of social and recreational activities based on individual and group interests, physical, mental, and psychosocial needs, that create opportunities for active participation in the community at large. This had the potential to affect all residents of the facility. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(iv) upon the request of the resident, provide direct or reasonable assistance with arranging for transportation to medical and social services appointments, shopping, and other recreation, and provide the name of or other identifying information about the [...]”

    • Tag 510: 144G.41 Subd. 3 Infection control program Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to establish and maintain an infection control program that complies with accepted health care, medical, and nursing standards for infection control related to glove use for one of two unlicensed personnel ((ULP)-A).

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to establish and maintain an infection control program that complies with accepted health care, medical, and nursing standards for infection control related to glove use for one of two unlicensed personnel ((ULP)-A). [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) All assisted living facilities must establish and maintain an infection control program that complies with accepted health care, medical, and nursing standards for infection control. [...]”

    • Tag 620: 144G.42 Subd. 6 (a) / 626.557, Subd. 3 Compliance with requirements for reporting ma Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to comply with the requirements for reporting elopement for one of one discharged resident (R1) when the licensee was aware of the incident but did not report the incident to the Minnesota Adult Abuse Reporting Center (MAARC).

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to comply with the requirements for reporting elopement for one of one discharged resident (R1) when the licensee was aware of the incident but did not report the incident to the Minnesota Adult Abuse Reporting Center (MAARC). [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) The assisted living facility must comply with the requirements for the reporting of maltreatment of vulnerable adults in section 626.557. [...]”

    • Tag 730: 144G.43 Subd. 3 Contents of resident record Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to document services were provided as identified on the service plan for one of one resident (R2).

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to document services were provided as identified on the service plan for one of one resident (R2). [...]”

      Rule cited: “Contents of a resident record include the following for each resident: (1) identifying information, including the resident's name, date of birth, address, and telephone number; (2) the name, address, and telephone number of the resident's emergency contact, [...]”

    Show all 22
    • Tag 780: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (1) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Two (2) day · fine: $500.00 assessed
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide smoke alarms as required throughout the facility.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to provide smoke alarms as required throughout the facility. This deficient condition had the ability to affect all staff, visitors, and residents. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) Each assisted living facility must comply with the State Fire Code in Minnesota Rules, chapter 7511, and: (1) for dwellings or sleeping units, as defined in the State Fire Code: (i) provide smoke alarms in each room used for sleeping purposes; (ii) [...]”

    • Tag 790: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (2)-(3) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to store, maintain and inspect fire extinguishers as required throughout the facility.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to store, maintain and inspect fire extinguishers as required throughout the facility. This deficient condition had the ability to affect all staff, visitors, and residents. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(2) install and maintain portable fire extinguishers in accordance with the State Fire Code; (3) install portable fire extinguishers having a minimum 2-A:10-B:C rating within Group R-3 occupancies, as defined by the State Fire Code, located so that the travel [...]”

    • Tag 800: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (4) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days · fine: $500.00 assessed
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to maintain the facility's physical environment in a continuous state of good repair and operation regarding the health, safety, and well-being of the residents.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to maintain the facility's physical environment in a continuous state of good repair and operation regarding the health, safety, and well-being of the residents. This had the potential to directly affect all residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(4) keep the physical environment, including walls, floors, ceiling, all furnishings, grounds, systems, and equipment in a continuous state of good repair and operation with regard to the health, safety, comfort, and well-being of the residents in accordance [...]”

    • Tag 810: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (b)-(f) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to maintain the facility's fire safety and evacuation plan with required content, make the plan readily available, provide required training and drills.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to maintain the facility's fire safety and evacuation plan with required content, make the plan readily available, provide required training and drills. This had the potential to directly affect all residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(b) Each assisted living facility shall develop and maintain fire safety and evacuation plans. [...]”

    • Tag 820: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (g) Fire protection and physical environment Level 3, widespread scope, scope/level letter I · correction period: Immediate · fine: $3,000.00 assessed
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide facilities that were not a distinct hazard to life.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to provide facilities that were not a distinct hazard to life. This had the potential to directly affect all residents and staff. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(g) Existing construction or elements, including assisted living facilities that were registered as housing with services establishments under chapter 144D prior to August 1, 2021, shall be permitted to continue in use provided such use does not constitute a [...]”

    • Tag 970: 144G.50 Subd. 5 Waivers of liability prohibited Level 1, widespread scope, scope/level letter C · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the assisted living contract did not include language waiving the licensee's liability for the health, safety, or personal property of a resident.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the assisted living contract did not include language waiving the licensee's liability for the health, safety, or personal property of a resident. This had the ability to impact all residents who have signed an assisted living contract. [...]”

      Rule cited: “The contract must not include a waiver of facility liability for the health and safety or personal property of a resident. [...]”

    • Tag 1440: 144G.62 Subd. 4 Supervision of staff providing delegated nurs Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure a registered nurse completed delegated task supervision within 30 calendar days for one of one unlicensed personnel (ULP)-A.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure a registered nurse completed delegated task supervision within 30 calendar days for one of one unlicensed personnel (ULP)-A. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) Staff who perform delegated nursing or therapy tasks must be supervised by an appropriate licensed health professional or a registered nurse according to the assisted living facility's policy where the services are being provided to verify that the work [...]”

    • Tag 1470: 144G.63 Subd. 2 Content of required orientation Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide orientation to assisted living licensing requirements and regulations prior to providing services for one of one employee (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-A).

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to provide orientation to assisted living licensing requirements and regulations prior to providing services for one of one employee (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-A). [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) The orientation must contain the following topics: (1) an overview of this chapter; (2) an introduction and review of the facility's policies and procedures related to the provision of assisted living services by the individual staff person; (3) handling [...]”

    • Tag 1530: 144G.64 TRAINING IN DEMENTIA CARE REQUIRED Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure employees received the required eight (8) hours of dementia care training prior to providing cares to residents for one of one employee (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-A).

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure employees received the required eight (8) hours of dementia care training prior to providing cares to residents for one of one employee (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-A). [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) All assisted living facilities must meet the following training requirements: (1) supervisors of direct-care staff must have at least eight hours of initial training on topics specified under paragraph (b) within 120 working hours of the employment start [...]”

    • Tag 1620: 144G.70 Subd. 2 (c-e) Initial reviews, assessments, and monitoring Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure a registered nurse (RN) completed comprehensive assessments to include all required content identified per Minnesota Administrative Rule 4659.0150 Uniform Assessment Tool for one of one resident (R2).

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure a registered nurse (RN) completed comprehensive assessments to include all required content identified per Minnesota Administrative Rule 4659.0150 Uniform Assessment Tool for one of one resident (R2). [...]”

      Rule cited: “(c) Resident reassessment and monitoring must be conducted no more than 14 calendar days after initiation of services. [...]”

    • Tag 1760: 144G.71 Subd. 8 Documentation of administration of medication Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure medication administration was documented accurately for one of one resident (R2) who received medication management.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure medication administration was documented accurately for one of one resident (R2) who received medication management. [...]”

      Rule cited: “Each medication administered by the assisted living facility staff must be documented in the resident's record. The documentation must include the signature and title of the person who administered the medication. [...]”

    • Tag 1790: 144G.71 Subd. 10 Medication management for residents who will Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) documented training and competencies for unlicensed personnel (ULP)-A who would provide medications for residents with unplanned time away from home when a licensed nurse was not available.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) documented training and competencies for unlicensed personnel (ULP)-A who would provide medications for residents with unplanned time away from home when a licensed nurse was not available. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(2) for unplanned time away, when the pharmacy is not able to provide the medications, a licensed nurse or unlicensed personnel shall provide medications in amounts and dosages needed for the length of the anticipated absence, not to exceed seven calendar [...]”

    • Tag 1940: 144G.72 Subd. 3 Individualized treatment or therapy managemen Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to include a written statement of a treatment service on the resident's service plan for one of one resident (R2).

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to include a written statement of a treatment service on the resident's service plan for one of one resident (R2). [...]”

      Rule cited: “For each resident receiving management of ordered or prescribed treatments or therapy services, the assisted living facility must prepare and include in the service plan a written statement of the treatment or therapy services that will be provided to the [...]”

    • Tag 1950: 144G.72 Subd. 4 Administration of treatments and therapy Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) specified, in writing, specific instructions for each resident and documented those instructions in the resident's record for one of one resident (R2) who had an ordered treatment.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) specified, in writing, specific instructions for each resident and documented those instructions in the resident's record for one of one resident (R2) who had an ordered treatment. [...]”

      Rule cited: “Ordered or prescribed treatments or therapies must be administered by a nurse, physician, or other licensed health professional authorized to perform the treatment or therapy, or may be delegated or assigned to unlicensed personnel by the licensed health [...]”

    • Tag 1960: 144G.72 Subd. 5 Documentation of administration of treatments Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure documentation of the administration of a treatment or therapy was completed for one of one resident (R2).

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure documentation of the administration of a treatment or therapy was completed for one of one resident (R2). [...]”

      Rule cited: “Each treatment or therapy administered by an assisted living facility must be in the resident record. [...]”

    • Tag 2310: 144G.91 Subd. 4 (a) Appropriate care and services Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Two (2) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide care and services according to acceptable health care, medical, or nursing standards for one of one resident (R2) with bed rails (also referred to as side rails).

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to provide care and services according to acceptable health care, medical, or nursing standards for one of one resident (R2) with bed rails (also referred to as side rails). [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) Residents have the right to care and assisted living services that are appropriate based on the resident's needs and according to an up-to-date service plan subject to accepted health care standards.”

    • Tag 3090: 144.6502, Subd. 8 Notice to Visitors Level 1, widespread scope, scope/level letter C · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the required notice was posted at the main entry way of the establishment to display statutory language to disclose electronic monitoring activity, potentially affecting all current residents in the assisted living facility, staff, and any visitors to the facility.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to ensure the required notice was posted at the main entry way of the establishment to display statutory language to disclose electronic monitoring activity, potentially affecting all current residents in the assisted living facility, staff, and any visitors to the facility. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) A facility must post a sign at each facility entrance accessible to visitors that states: "Electronic monitoring devices, including security cameras and audio devices, may be present to record persons and activities. [...]”

    MDH letters in this report

    • November 20, 2024: Notice Of Extension To Conditional License
    • July 15, 2024: Notice Of Extension To Conditional License
    • April 2, 2024: Notice Of Conditional License

    From MDH’s letter: the letter says the facility is not in substantial compliance.

    Fines assessed by MDH

    • Tag 780 (144g.45 Subd. 2 (a) (1) - Fire Protection And Physical Environment): $500.00
    • Tag 800 (144g.45 Subd. 2 (a) (4) - Fire Protection And Physical Environment): $500.00
    • Tag 820 (144g.45 Subd. 2 (g) - Fire Protection And Physical Environment): $3,000.00

    Total fines assessed, as printed in the letter: $4,000.00.

    Total fines assessed, as printed in the letter: $3,000.00.

What the levels and scopes mean (MDH’s words)

Level 1: “a violation that has no potential to cause more than a minimal impact on the resident and does not affect health or safety”

Level 2: “a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death”

Level 3: “a violation that harmed a resident's health or safety, not including serious injury, impairment, or death, or a violation that has the potential to lead to serious injury, impairment, or death”

Isolated scope: “when one or a limited number of residents are affected or one or a limited number of staff are involved, or the situation has occurred only occasionally”

Pattern scope: “when more than a limited number of residents are affected, more than a limited number of staff are involved, or the situation has occurred repeatedly; but is not found to be pervasive”

Widespread scope: “when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has affected or has the potential to affect a large portion or all of the residents”

Summaries are ours and are marked “Summary”; quoted text is MDH’s own, shortened where marked [...]. Read the full reports at the links above or search every report on MDH’s site.

What these terms mean

MDH: “An evaluation is a process regulated by the division to ensure licensees comply with the laws, rules, and certifications for the type of care and services authorized under their license/certification.”

“An investigation may occur when the division is notified that care and services are not being provided by licensees as required by law. This may include allegations of abuse, neglect, or financial misuse.”

For maltreatment, Minnesota law defines substantiated as “a preponderance of the evidence shows that an act that meets the definition of maltreatment occurred” and inconclusive as “less than a preponderance of evidence to show that maltreatment did or did not occur” (Minn. Stat. 626.5572).

Correction orders, as MDH explains on each state form: “Tag numbers have been assigned to Minnesota State Statutes for Assisted Living Facilities.” “The letter in the left column is used for tracking purposes and reflects the scope and level issued pursuant to 144G.31 subd. 1, 2, and 3.” MDH adds that there is no requirement to submit a plan of correction for violations of Minnesota state statutes.

MDH keeps investigation results for seven years when allegations are substantiated, four years when inconclusive, and three years when unsubstantiated, so the counts cover different periods. This community is licensed for 4 residents; larger communities are evaluated and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division, data as of September 28, 2026. Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.

License and ownershipActive license, licensee STANTON HOUSE WITH SERVICES
License type
Assisted Living Facility
License number
426111
License status
Active
Current license dated
2026-07-01
Licensed capacity
4
Licensee
STANTON HOUSE WITH SERVICES
Administrator/Authorized Agent
Terra Ross

Source: Minnesota state licensing records (agency listing), retrieved 2026-09-09. Licensing status is a matter of public record; it is not a quality rating.

Administrator/Authorized Agent name from the Minnesota licensing record, as of Sep 9, 2026.

Paying with Medicaid and other programsHow Medicaid pays for care in Minnesota, and other programs

How Medicaid pays for care in Minnesota

  • Elderly Waiver (EW), customized living services. Minnesota's Elderly Waiver, part of Medical Assistance (Minnesota Medicaid), can pay for "customized living" services, and a provider of those services must hold an assisted living license (or meet certain exceptions). You must qualify for Medical Assistance and need a nursing-home level of care. (state page)

Ask the community whether it accepts Medicaid.

Location and nearby careNearest hospital 2.0 mi, nursing home 1.5 mi, pharmacy 2.6 mi
Nearest hospital with an emergency room
North Memorial Health Hospital, Robbinsdale. 2.0 miles away, straight line. CMS overall hospital rating: 1 of 5 stars. Location approximate.
Nearest Medicare nursing home
The Villas at Robbinsdale, Robbinsdale. 1.5 miles away, straight line.
Nearest home health agency office
Good Samaritan Society - Home Care, Robbinsdale. 2.0 miles away, straight line. Agencies travel to clients, so ask which ones serve this address.
Nearest pharmacy
Walgreens. 2.6 miles away, straight line. From OpenStreetMap, which does not list every pharmacy, so one may be closer.
Area
USDA classes ZIP code 55412 as metropolitan (metropolitan core).
Dialysis within 15 miles
Davita Robbinsdale Dialysis, Robbinsdale, 1.2 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 3 of 5 stars)
Fkc - Robbinsdale Dialysis, Robbinsdale, 1.9 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 2 of 5 stars)
Fmc Dialysis - Golden Valley, Golden Valley, 3.1 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 3 of 5 stars)
Hospice
18 Medicare hospices tell CMS they serve ZIP code 55412.
North Memorial Home Hlth Hospc, office in Robbinsdale, 1.4 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 4 of 5 stars)
Grace Hospice, office in Minneapolis, 2.4 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 4 of 5 stars)
Moments Hospice, office in Golden Valley, 3.0 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 1 of 5 stars)
Nearest geriatric medicine practice
Twin Cities Physicians Professional Corporation, Golden Valley. 2.9 miles away, straight line. 3 geriatric medicine doctors listed there.

Distances are straight lines from the community, not driving distance. Hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors come from CMS provider data (CMS, hospital list updated Jul 22, 2026). Star ratings are CMS’s own.

Emergency and natural hazard riskFEMA overall risk relatively low; outside FEMA's high-risk flood areas

Public hazard maps for this location. Ask the community about its emergency plan, its generator and where residents would go in an evacuation.

Flood zone
Outside the high and moderate risk flood areas on FEMA's flood map (Zone X, minimal flood hazard, or not studied). (FEMA flood map)
FEMA National Risk Index
Overall: relatively low. By hazard: inland flooding relatively low, wildfire very low, tornado relatively moderate, heat wave relatively moderate, earthquake very low. These are FEMA’s ratings for the census tract, compared with tracts nationwide. (FEMA, December 2025)

A flood zone describes the map at this point, not the building's elevation. In an emergency, follow the local emergency management agency.

Questions to ask on a tour10 questions picked for this community from its record

Picked for this community from its record. Ask them in person and write down the answers.

  1. The current license dates from 2026. Has the owner or operator changed recently?
  2. What does the base rate include, and when did rates last go up?
  3. Who is here at night? Are they awake, or asleep and on call?
  4. Who covers when the owner is sick, on vacation, or away for the day? Can we meet them?
  5. Is it one flat rate, or does it rise with care needs?
  6. Can you help someone who needs two people to move, or a mechanical lift?
  7. How many caregivers are on duty during the day and at night?
  8. What happens if care needs increase? When would someone need to move?
  9. What fees are charged at move-in?
  10. How do you tell families about falls, illness or changes?
What we checked11 public sources we searched, with dates

Every public source we searched for this community. “Nothing on record” means we found no record that matched it. A record can be missed when a name or address differs.

SourceData as ofWhat we found
Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division inspection recordsSep 28, 2026See above
U.S. Department of Labor wage and hour casesOct 15, 2026Nothing on record
OSHA workplace safety inspections since 2016Oct 15, 2026Nothing on record
FEMA flood mapSee above
USDA wildfire riskApr 15, 2026Not shown: FEMA rates wildfire risk here very low
FEMA National Risk IndexSee above
CMS hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors; OpenStreetMap pharmaciesSee above
HUD Multifamily Properties - AssistedJul 6, 2026Nothing on record
State Veterans Homes (NASVH directory)Sep 20, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Hospice - General InformationAug 19, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Home Health Care AgenciesMay 27, 2026Nothing on record
Common questionsAnswers to 4 questions families ask
What type of care does Stanton House With Services provide?

Stanton House With Services is licensed by the state of Minnesota for assisted living in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Its licensed capacity is 4 residents.

Does Lilisity rate Stanton House With Services?

No. We publish state licensing details for Stanton House With Services but no score, rating, or ranking. Only communities on the Top Communities list or with a Senior Living Alliance Excellence Award, both based on phone-verified resident and family interviews, are ranked.

How much does Stanton House With Services cost?

Assisted Living in Hennepin County typically starts at $2,500 to $4,400 a month. Based on 18 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price. Stanton House With Services does not publish its prices.

How do I contact Stanton House With Services?

Visit Stanton House With Services at 3354 James Avenue North, Minneapolis, MN 55412.

Choosing a small care homeOur care guide: what to look for, what it costs, how families pay, and more questions to ask (PDF)

Report a wrong fact

How Lilisity works. The only scores or rankings Lilisity publishes are the Top Communities list and the Excellence Awards, both built from phone-verified resident and family interviews. Communities can pay Lilisity a flat monthly fee to manage their own listing: photos, prices, contact details, and receiving the inquiries families choose to send them. The fee is the same no matter how many families contact them or move in. Senior Living Alliance, which runs Lilisity, offers the same listing to its member communities as part of their membership; members pay SLA for its resident and family interview program. No community pays Lilisity per inquiry, per referral or per move-in. Payment never changes a testimonial, a rating, or the order of search results. The "Nearby Senior Living Alliance communities" box shows member communities only. How we verify testimonials · How we are paid