Assisted Living
Souriyathay Enterprises
10932 Gettysburg Avenue North, Champlin, MN 55316 · Map
Licensed for 5 residents · SOURIYATHAY ENTERPRISES LLC
Souriyathay Enterprises is a state-licensed assisted living community in Champlin, Minnesota. It is licensed for 5 residents. Lilisity publishes no score or ranking for this community; the details below come from the state licensing record.
Prices
This community does not publish its prices.
Area costs
Lilisity’s independent report
What the public record shows
Gathered by Lilisity from state and federal sources. Communities can’t edit this part of the page.
License
Active, 5 residents
Assisted Living Facility 423595, current license dated Feb 1, 2026. Licensee SOURIYATHAY ENTERPRISES LLC.
Nearest emergency room
2.5 miles
Mercy Hospital, rated 3 of 5 stars by CMS.
Side by side with nearby communities
The 4 nearest communities that offer assisted living, by straight-line distance. Prices are starting prices each community publishes; we never show estimates.
| Community | Distance | Licensed capacity | Published starting price | License | Inspection citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Souriyathay Enterprises this community | 5 | Not published | Active | 1 substantiated | |
| Healthsync Solutions | 0.0 mi | 5 | Not published | Active | No record |
| The Encore at Champlin | 0.5 mi | 30 | Not published | Active | 0 substantiated |
| 114th Avenue Home | 1.1 mi | 5 | Not published | Active | No record |
| Uplift Home Care Services, 104th Place N | 1.1 mi | 5 | Not published | Active | No record |
State inspection record1 substantiated
- Last evaluation
- August 8, 2024
- Evaluations on record
- 1
- Investigations substantiated
- 1 kept 7 years
- Inconclusive
- 0 kept 4 years
- Unsubstantiated
- 0 kept 3 years
Most recent evaluation (August 8, 2024, state report 3ZQF11)
MDH: “On August 5, 2024, August 8, 2024, the Minnesota Department of Health conducted a survey at the above provider, and the following correction orders are issued.”
Survey completed August 8, 2024: 10 correction orders
- Tag 480: 144G.41 Subd 1 (13) (i) (B) Minimum requirements Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Please refer to the FBEIR for any compliance dates
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code. This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety) and was issued at a widespread scope (when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has affected or has the potential to affect a large portion or all the [...]”
Rule cited: “(13) offer to provide or make available at least the following services to residents: (B) food must be prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code, Minnesota Rules, chapter 4626; and”
- Tag 680: 144G.42 Subd. 10 Disaster planning and emergency preparedness Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to have a written emergency preparedness plan (EPP) with all the required content when the licensee failed to update the EPP to provide temporary shelter accessible by residents who used wheelchairs for mobility.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to have a written emergency preparedness plan (EPP) with all the required content when the licensee failed to update the EPP to provide temporary shelter accessible by residents who used wheelchairs for mobility. This had the potential to impact all residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) The facility must meet the following requirements: (1) have a written emergency disaster plan that contains a plan for evacuation, addresses elements of sheltering in place, identifies temporary relocation sites, and details staff assignments in the event [...]”
- Tag 780: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (1) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Two (2) day
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide interconnected smoke alarms throughout the facility.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to provide interconnected smoke alarms throughout the facility. This had the potential to directly affect all residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) Each assisted living facility must comply with the State Fire Code in Minnesota Rules, chapter 7511, and: (1) for dwellings or sleeping units, as defined in the State Fire Code: (i) provide smoke alarms in each room used for sleeping purposes; (ii) [...]”
- Tag 790: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (2)-(3) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Two (2) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide or maintain fire extinguishers as required throughout the facility.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to provide or maintain fire extinguishers as required throughout the facility. This deficient condition had the ability to affect all staff, visitors, and residents. [...]”
Rule cited: “(2) install and maintain portable fire extinguishers in accordance with the State Fire Code; (3) install portable fire extinguishers having a minimum 2-A:10-B:C rating within Group R-3 occupancies, as defined by the State Fire Code, located so that the travel [...]”
- Tag 800: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (4) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to maintain the facility's physical environment in a continuous state of good repair and operation regarding the health, safety, and well-being of the residents.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to maintain the facility's physical environment in a continuous state of good repair and operation regarding the health, safety, and well-being of the residents. This had the potential to directly affect all residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”
Rule cited: “(4) keep the physical environment, including walls, floors, ceiling, all furnishings, grounds, systems, and equipment in a continuous state of good repair and operation with regard to the health, safety, comfort, and well-being of the residents in accordance [...]”
Show all 10
- Tag 810: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (b)-(f) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop the fire safety and evacuation plan with required content, make the plan readily available, provide required training and drills.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to develop the fire safety and evacuation plan with required content, make the plan readily available, provide required training and drills. This had the potential to directly affect all residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”
Rule cited: “(b) Each assisted living facility shall develop and maintain fire safety and evacuation plans. [...]”
- Tag 820: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (g) Fire protection and physical environment Level 3, pattern scope, scope/level letter H · correction period: Immediate
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide facilities that were not a distinct hazard to life.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to provide facilities that were not a distinct hazard to life. This had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents, staff and visitors. [...]”
Rule cited: “(g) Existing construction or elements, including assisted living facilities that were registered as housing with services establishments under chapter 144D prior to August 1, 2021, shall be permitted to continue in use provided such use does not constitute a [...]”
- Tag 1750: 144G.71 Subd. 7 Delegation of medication administration Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the administration of resident medications was documented by unlicensed personnel (ULP) for one of one employee (ULP-B).
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the administration of resident medications was documented by unlicensed personnel (ULP) for one of one employee (ULP-B). [...]”
Rule cited: “When administration of medications is delegated to unlicensed personnel, the assisted living facility must ensure that the registered nurse has: (1) instructed the unlicensed personnel in the proper methods to administer the medications, and the unlicensed [...]”
- Tag 1770: 144G.71 Subd. 9 Documentation of medication setup Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure documentation of medication setup included all the required content for one of one resident (R1).
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure documentation of medication setup included all the required content for one of one resident (R1). [...]”
Rule cited: “Documentation of dates of medication setup, name of medication, quantity of dose, times to be administered, route of administration, and name of person completing medication setup must be done at the time of setup.”
- Tag 2310: 144G.91 Subd. 4 (a) Appropriate care and services Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Two (2) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure care and services were provided according to a suitable and up-to-date plan, and subject to acceptable health care and medical, or nursing standards with side rails for two of two residents (R1, R2).
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure care and services were provided according to a suitable and up-to-date plan, and subject to acceptable health care and medical, or nursing standards with side rails for two of two residents (R1, R2). [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) Residents have the right to care and assisted living services that are appropriate based on the resident's needs and according to an up-to-date service plan subject to accepted health care standards.”
From MDH’s letter: the letter says the facility is in substantial compliance; no immediate fines.
Substantiated investigations (state reports)
- December 8, 2023 · report HL365605373C
Details
Survey completed October 24, 2023: 8 correction orders
- Tag 110: 144G.10 Subdivision 1a Assisted living director license required Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: TWO (2) DAYS
Details
Summary: MDH found the facility failed to employ a licensed assisted living director (LALD) licensed by the Board of Executives for Long Term Services and Supports.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to employ a licensed assisted living director (LALD) licensed by the Board of Executives for Long Term Services and Supports. This had the potential to impact all eight residents who were occupants of the facility. [...]”
Rule cited: “Each assisted living facility must employ an assisted living director licensed or permitted by the Board of Executives for Long Term Services and Supports.?”
- Tag 130: 144G.12, Subd. 1 Application for Licensure Level 1, widespread scope, scope/level letter C · correction period: TWO DAYS
Details
Summary: MDH found the facility failed to ensure the facility capacity did not exceed the licensed capacity agreed upon when applying for licensure of the assisted living facility and subsequent renewals.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility capacity did not exceed the licensed capacity agreed upon when applying for licensure of the assisted living facility and subsequent renewals. This had the potential to impact all eight residents who resided at the assisted living facility. [...]”
Rule cited: “Each application for an assisted living facility license, including provisional and renewal applications, must include information sufficient to show that the applicant meets the requirements of licensure, including: (1) the business name and legal entity [...]”
- Tag 485: 144G.41 Subdivision 1. (13)(i)(A)and(C) Minimum Requirements Level 1, widespread scope, scope/level letter C · correction period: SEVEN (7) DAYS
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the Assisted Living With Dementia Care contract did not require any resident to include and pay for meals as a part of their assisted living package fee.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the Assisted Living With Dementia Care contract did not require any resident to include and pay for meals as a part of their assisted living package fee. This had the potential to affect all residents living in the facility. [...]”
Rule cited: “(13) offer to provide or make available at least the following services to residents: (i) at least three nutritious meals daily with snacks available seven days per week, according to the recommended dietary allowances in the United States Department of [...]”
- Tag 495: 144G.41 Subd. 1 (14) Minimum Requirements Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F
Details
Summary: MDH found the facility failed to ensure access to an on-call registered nurse 24 hours per day, seven days per week.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and observation, the facility failed to ensure access to an on-call registered nurse 24 hours per day, seven days per week. This had the potiential to impact all residents who resided at the assisted living facility. [...]”
Rule cited: “(14) provide staff access to an on-call registered nurse 24 hours per day, seven days per week”
- Tag 590: 144G.42 Subd. 3 Facility restrictions Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: SEVEN (7) DAYS
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to follow facility restrictions for two of eight residents (R1 and R2).
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to follow facility restrictions for two of eight residents (R1 and R2). The facility owner/administrator (ADM)-A accepted power of attorney and signed as a legal representative for R1 and R2. [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) This subdivision does not apply to licensees that are Minnesota counties or other units of government. [...]”
Show all 8
- Tag 630: 144G.42 Subd. 6 (b) Compliance with requirements for reporting ma Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: SEVEN (7) DAYS
Details
Summary: MDH found the facility failed to develop and implement individual abuse prevention plans (IAPP)s for three of eight (R1, R2, R3) residents reviewed.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement individual abuse prevention plans (IAPP)s for three of eight (R1, R2, R3) residents reviewed. The facility also failed to ensure IAPPs were individualized and included interventions for resident vulnerabilities for five of eight residents (R4, R5, R6, R7, R8). [...]”
Rule cited: “(b) The facility must develop and implement an individual abuse prevention plan for each vulnerable adult. [...]”
- Tag 900: 144G.50 Subdivision 1 Contract required Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS
Details
Summary: MDH found the facility failed to ensure a written contract was executed to include required terms concerning provision of housing and services and facility requirements
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a written contract was executed to include required terms concerning provision of housing and services and facility requirements prior to providing housing or assisted living services to three of eight residents (R1, R2, and R3) who resided in the assisted living. [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) An assisted living facility may not offer or provide housing or assisted living services to any individual unless it has executed a written contract with the resident. [...]”
- Tag 1650: 144G.70 Subd. 4 (f) Service plan, implementation and revisions to Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS
Details
Summary: MDH found the facility failed to ensure service plans contained all the required information for seven of eight residents (R1, R2, R4, R5, R6, R6, R7) with records reviewed.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure service plans contained all the required information for seven of eight residents (R1, R2, R4, R5, R6, R6, R7) with records reviewed. [...]”
Rule cited: “(f) The service plan must include: (1) a description of the services to be provided, the fees for services, and the frequency of each service, according to the resident's current assessment and resident preferences; (2) the identification of staff or [...]”
- Tag 110: 144G.10 Subdivision 1a Assisted living director license required Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: TWO (2) DAYS
What the levels and scopes mean (MDH’s words)
Level 1: “a violation that has no potential to cause more than a minimal impact on the resident and does not affect health or safety”
Level 2: “a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death”
Level 3: “a violation that harmed a resident's health or safety, not including serious injury, impairment, or death, or a violation that has the potential to lead to serious injury, impairment, or death”
Isolated scope: “when one or a limited number of residents are affected or one or a limited number of staff are involved, or the situation has occurred only occasionally”
Pattern scope: “when more than a limited number of residents are affected, more than a limited number of staff are involved, or the situation has occurred repeatedly; but is not found to be pervasive”
Widespread scope: “when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has affected or has the potential to affect a large portion or all of the residents”
Summaries are ours and are marked “Summary”; quoted text is MDH’s own, shortened where marked [...]. Read the full reports at the links above or search every report on MDH’s site.
What these terms mean
MDH: “An evaluation is a process regulated by the division to ensure licensees comply with the laws, rules, and certifications for the type of care and services authorized under their license/certification.”
“An investigation may occur when the division is notified that care and services are not being provided by licensees as required by law. This may include allegations of abuse, neglect, or financial misuse.”
For maltreatment, Minnesota law defines substantiated as “a preponderance of the evidence shows that an act that meets the definition of maltreatment occurred” and inconclusive as “less than a preponderance of evidence to show that maltreatment did or did not occur” (Minn. Stat. 626.5572).
Correction orders, as MDH explains on each state form: “Tag numbers have been assigned to Minnesota State Statutes for Assisted Living Facilities.” “The letter in the left column is used for tracking purposes and reflects the scope and level issued pursuant to 144G.31 subd. 1, 2, and 3.” MDH adds that there is no requirement to submit a plan of correction for violations of Minnesota state statutes.
MDH keeps investigation results for seven years when allegations are substantiated, four years when inconclusive, and three years when unsubstantiated, so the counts cover different periods. This community is licensed for 5 residents; larger communities are evaluated and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division, data as of September 28, 2026. Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.
License and ownershipActive license, licensee SOURIYATHAY ENTERPRISES LLC
- License type
- Assisted Living Facility
- License number
- 423595
- License status
- Active
- Current license dated
- 2026-02-01
- Licensed capacity
- 5
- Licensee
- SOURIYATHAY ENTERPRISES LLC
- County
- Hennepin County
- Administrator/Authorized Agent
- Phinhsaykeo Souriyathay
Source: Minnesota state licensing records (agency listing), retrieved 2026-09-09. Licensing status is a matter of public record; it is not a quality rating.
Administrator/Authorized Agent name from the Minnesota licensing record, as of Sep 9, 2026.
Paying with Medicaid and other programsHow Medicaid pays for care in Minnesota, and other programs
How Medicaid pays for care in Minnesota
- Elderly Waiver (EW), customized living services. Minnesota's Elderly Waiver, part of Medical Assistance (Minnesota Medicaid), can pay for "customized living" services, and a provider of those services must hold an assisted living license (or meet certain exceptions). You must qualify for Medical Assistance and need a nursing-home level of care. (state page)
Ask the community whether it accepts Medicaid.
Location and nearby careNearest hospital 2.5 mi, nursing home 2.8 mi, pharmacy 1.4 mi
- Nearest hospital with an emergency room
- Mercy Hospital, Coon Rapids. 2.5 miles away, straight line. CMS overall hospital rating: 3 of 5 stars.
- Nearest Medicare nursing home
- The Villas at Osseo LLC, Osseo. 2.8 miles away, straight line.
- Nearest home health agency office
- Regency Home Healthcare Services, LLC, Maple Grove. 2.3 miles away, straight line. Agencies travel to clients, so ask which ones serve this address.
- Nearest pharmacy
- CVS Pharmacy. 1.4 miles away, straight line. From OpenStreetMap, which does not list every pharmacy, so one may be closer.
- Area
- USDA classes ZIP code 55316 as metropolitan (metropolitan core).
- Dialysis within 15 miles
- Fresenius Medical Care - Champlin, Champlin, 1.7 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 3 of 5 stars)
Davita Mississippi Gateway Dialysis, Coon Rapids, 2.5 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 3 of 5 stars)
Fmc - Coon Rapids, Coon Rapids, 3.8 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 3 of 5 stars) - Hospice
- 24 Medicare hospices tell CMS they serve ZIP code 55316.
Favoured Hospice, LLC, office in Dayton, 3.5 miles away, straight line
Mary T Hospice, office in Coon Rapids, 5.2 miles away, straight line
North Memorial Home Hlth Hospc, office in Robbinsdale, 10.0 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 4 of 5 stars) - Nearest geriatric medicine practice
- Group Health Inc, Coon Rapids. 4.5 miles away, straight line. 1 geriatric medicine doctor listed there.
Distances are straight lines from the community, not driving distance. Hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors come from CMS provider data (CMS, hospital list updated Jul 22, 2026). Star ratings are CMS’s own.
Emergency and natural hazard riskFEMA overall risk relatively moderate; outside FEMA's high-risk flood areas
Public hazard maps for this location. Ask the community about its emergency plan, its generator and where residents would go in an evacuation.
- Flood zone
- Outside the high and moderate risk flood areas on FEMA's flood map (Zone X, minimal flood hazard, or not studied). (FEMA flood map)
- FEMA National Risk Index
- Overall: relatively moderate. By hazard: inland flooding relatively moderate, wildfire relatively low, tornado relatively high, heat wave relatively high, earthquake very low. These are FEMA’s ratings for the census tract, compared with tracts nationwide. (FEMA, December 2025)
A flood zone describes the map at this point, not the building's elevation. In an emergency, follow the local emergency management agency.
Questions to ask on a tour10 questions picked for this community from its record
Picked for this community from its record. Ask them in person and write down the answers.
- The current license dates from 2026. Has the owner or operator changed recently?
- What does the base rate include, and when did rates last go up?
- Who is here at night? Are they awake, or asleep and on call?
- Who covers when the owner is sick, on vacation, or away for the day? Can we meet them?
- Is it one flat rate, or does it rise with care needs?
- Can you help someone who needs two people to move, or a mechanical lift?
- How many caregivers are on duty during the day and at night?
- What happens if care needs increase? When would someone need to move?
- What fees are charged at move-in?
- How do you tell families about falls, illness or changes?
What we checked11 public sources we searched, with dates
Every public source we searched for this community. “Nothing on record” means we found no record that matched it. A record can be missed when a name or address differs.
| Source | Data as of | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division inspection records | Sep 28, 2026 | See above |
| U.S. Department of Labor wage and hour cases | Oct 15, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| OSHA workplace safety inspections since 2016 | Oct 15, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| FEMA flood map | See above | |
| USDA wildfire risk | Apr 15, 2026 | Not shown: FEMA rates wildfire risk here relatively low |
| FEMA National Risk Index | See above | |
| CMS hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors; OpenStreetMap pharmacies | See above | |
| HUD Multifamily Properties - Assisted | Jul 6, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| State Veterans Homes (NASVH directory) | Sep 20, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| CMS Hospice - General Information | Aug 19, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| CMS Home Health Care Agencies | May 27, 2026 | Nothing on record |
Common questionsAnswers to 4 questions families ask
What type of care does Souriyathay Enterprises provide?
Souriyathay Enterprises is licensed by the state of Minnesota for assisted living in Champlin, Minnesota. Its licensed capacity is 5 residents.
Does Lilisity rate Souriyathay Enterprises?
No. We publish state licensing details for Souriyathay Enterprises but no score, rating, or ranking. Only communities on the Top Communities list or with a Senior Living Alliance Excellence Award, both based on phone-verified resident and family interviews, are ranked.
How much does Souriyathay Enterprises cost?
Assisted Living in Hennepin County typically starts at $2,500 to $4,400 a month. Based on 18 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price. Souriyathay Enterprises does not publish its prices.
How do I contact Souriyathay Enterprises?
Visit Souriyathay Enterprises at 10932 Gettysburg Avenue North, Champlin, MN 55316.
How Lilisity works. The only scores or rankings Lilisity publishes are the Top Communities list and the Excellence Awards, both built from phone-verified resident and family interviews. Communities can pay Lilisity a flat monthly fee to manage their own listing: photos, prices, contact details, and receiving the inquiries families choose to send them. The fee is the same no matter how many families contact them or move in. Senior Living Alliance, which runs Lilisity, offers the same listing to its member communities as part of their membership; members pay SLA for its resident and family interview program. No community pays Lilisity per inquiry, per referral or per move-in. Payment never changes a testimonial, a rating, or the order of search results. The "Nearby Senior Living Alliance communities" box shows member communities only. How we verify testimonials · How we are paid