Lilisity

Assisted Living and Memory Care

S&O's Assisted Living

14856 Edgewater Road Ne, Pine City, MN 55063 · Map
Licensed for 12 residents · S&O'S ASSISTED LIVING LLC

State license active
Is this your community? Claim this listing

S&O's Assisted Living is a state-licensed assisted living, memory care community in Pine City, Minnesota. It is licensed for 12 residents. Lilisity publishes no score or ranking for this community; the details below come from the state licensing record.

Assisted LivingAlso memory care
12 residentsLicensed capacity
State licensedAssisted living facility dementia care
$2,200 to $4,800/moTypical assisted living start in Minnesota, from 74 communities that publish prices

Prices

This community does not publish its prices.

Area costs

Assisted Living in Minnesota typically starts at $2,200 to $4,800 a month. Based on 74 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price.
Memory Care in Minnesota typically starts at $3,900 to $8,600 a month. Based on 40 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price.

Lilisity’s independent report

What the public record shows

Gathered by Lilisity from state and federal sources. Communities can’t edit this part of the page.

State inspections

1Substantiated investigations

Last evaluation: Feb 7, 2025. See the record

License

Active, 12 residents

Assisted Living Facility Dementia Care 425011, current license dated Oct 1, 2025. Licensee S&O'S ASSISTED LIVING LLC.

Nearest emergency room

13.6 miles

Burnett Medical Center.

Side by side with nearby communities

The 4 nearest communities that offer assisted living, by straight-line distance. Prices are starting prices each community publishes; we never show estimates.

CommunityDistanceLicensed capacityPublished starting priceLicenseInspection citations
S&O's Assisted Living this community12Not publishedActive1 substantiated
Timber Pines Assisted Living1.0 mi115$5,155/moActive0 substantiated
Sophie's Manor Assisted Living1.7 mi11Not publishedActive0 substantiated
Elderwood of Hinckley11.5 mi36Not publishedActive0 substantiated
Rushseba Station Assisted Livi11.7 mi60$4,970/moActive0 substantiated
State inspection record1 substantiated
Last evaluation
February 7, 2025
Evaluations on record
2
Investigations substantiated
1 kept 7 years
Inconclusive
0 kept 4 years
Unsubstantiated
0 kept 3 years

Most recent evaluation (February 7, 2025, state report 55YM11)

MDH: “On June 8, 2026, the Minnesota Department of Health conducted a follow-up survey for the above provider to follow-up on orders issued pursuant to a license order follow up completed on February5, 2025.”

Survey completed June 8, 2026: 17 correction orders

  • Tag 340: 144G.30 Subd. 5 Correction orders (re-issued) Level 3, widespread scope, scope/level letter I
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed provide documentation with actions taken to comply with correction orders from a survey completed on February 5, 2025.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed provide documentation with actions taken to comply with correction orders from a survey completed on February 5, 2025. The lack of action to ensure compliance with regulations had the potential to affect all residents receiving services from the licensee. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) A correction order may be issued whenever the commissioner finds upon survey or during a complaint investigation that a facility, a managerial official, an agent of the facility, or staff of the facility is not in compliance with this chapter. [...]”

  • Tag 480: 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Subd. 1a (a-b) Minimum requirements; required food services (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Not reviewed during this survey.”

    Rule cited: “(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b), food must be prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code, Minnesota Rules, chapter 4626. [...]”

  • Tag 650: 144G.42 Subd. 8 (a) Staff records (re-issued) scope/level letter D
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Not reviewed during this survey.”

    Rule cited: “(a) The facility must maintain current records of each paid staff member, each regularly scheduled volunteer providing services, and each individual contractor providing services. [...]”

  • Tag 680: 144G.42 Subd. 10 Disaster planning and emergency preparedness (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Not reviewed during this survey.”

    Rule cited: “(a) The facility must meet the following requirements: (1) have a written emergency disaster plan that contains a plan for evacuation, addresses elements of sheltering in place, identifies temporary relocation sites, and details staff assignments in the event [...]”

  • Tag 775: 144G.45 Subd. 2. (a) Fire protection and physical environment (re-issued) Level 3, widespread scope, scope/level letter I · fine: $3,000.00 assessed
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to comply with the Minnesota State Fire Code, under Minnesota Rules Chapter 7511.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to comply with the Minnesota State Fire Code, under Minnesota Rules Chapter 7511. This had the potential to directly affect all of the residents and staff. [...]”

    Rule cited: “Each assisted living facility must comply with the State Fire Code in Minnesota Rules, chapter 7511, and:”

Show all 17
  • Tag 780: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (1) Fire protection and physical environment (re-issued) Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · fine: $500.00 assessed
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide smoke alarms inside and out-side resident rooms.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to provide smoke alarms inside and out-side resident rooms. This had the potential to directly affect all residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) Each assisted living facility must comply with the State Fire Code in Minnesota Rules, chapter 7511, and: (1) for dwellings or sleeping units, as defined in the State Fire Code: (i) provide smoke alarms in each room used for sleeping purposes; (ii) [...]”

  • Tag 810: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (b-f) Fire protection and physical environment (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Not reviewed during this survey.”

    Rule cited: “(b) Each assisted living facility shall develop and maintain fire safety and evacuation plans. [...]”

  • Tag 920: 144G.50 Subd. 2 (c) Contract information (re-issued) scope/level letter C
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Not reviewed during this survey.”

    Rule cited: “(c) The contract must include: (1) a disclosure of the category of assisted living facility license held by the facility and, if the facility is not an assisted living facility with dementia care, a disclosure that it does not hold an assisted living facility [...]”

  • Tag 940: 144G.50 Subd. 2 (e; 5-7) Contract information (re-issued) scope/level letter C
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Not reviewed during this survey.”

    Rule cited: “(5) a description of the facility's policies related to medical assistance waivers under chapter 256S and section 256B.49 and the housing support program under chapter 256I, including: (i) whether the facility is enrolled with the commissioner of human [...]”

  • Tag 1290: 144G.60 Subdivision 1 Background studies required (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Not reviewed during this survey.”

    Rule cited: “(a) Employees, contractors, and regularly scheduled volunteers of the facility are subject to the background study required by section 144.057 and may be disqualified under chapter 245C. [...]”

  • Tag 1440: 144G.62 Subd. 4 Supervision of staff providing delegated nurs (re-issued) scope/level letter D
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Not reviewed during this survey.”

    Rule cited: “(a) Staff who perform delegated nursing or therapy tasks must be supervised by an appropriate licensed health professional or a registered nurse according to the assisted living facility's policy where the services are being provided to verify that the work [...]”

  • Tag 1540: 144G.64 (a) (3) Training in Dementia, Mental Illness, and De- (re-issued) scope/level letter D
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Not reviewed during this survey.”

    Rule cited: “(3) for assisted living facilities with dementia care, direct-care staff must have completed at least eight hours of initial training on topics specified under paragraph (b) within 80 working hours of the employment start date. [...]”

  • Tag 1620: 144G.70 Subd. 2 (c-e) Initial reviews, assessments, and monitoring (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Not reviewed during this survey.”

    Rule cited: “(a) Residents who are not receiving any assisted living services shall not be required to undergo an initial nursing assessment. [...]”

  • Tag 1730: 144G.71 Subd. 5 Individualized medication management plan (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Not reviewed during this survey.”

    Rule cited: “(a) For each resident receiving medication management services, a registered nurse, advanced practice registered nurse, or qualified staff delegated the task by a registered nurse must prepare and include in the service plan a written statement of the [...]”

  • Tag 1910: 144G.71 Subd. 22 Disposition of medications (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Not reviewed during this survey.”

    Rule cited: “(a) Any current medications being managed by the assisted living facility must be provided to the resident when the resident's service plan ends or medication management services are no longer part of the service plan. [...]”

  • Tag 2100: 144G.82 Subd. 2 Additional requirements (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Not reviewed during this survey.”

    Rule cited: “(a) The licensee must follow the assisted living license requirements and the criteria in this section. [...]”

  • Tag 2110: 144G.82 Subd. 3 Policies (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Not reviewed during this survey.”

    Rule cited: “(a) In addition to the policies and procedures required in the licensing of all facilities, the assisted living facility with dementia care licensee must develop and implement policies and procedures that address the: (1) philosophy of how services are [...]”

Survey completed March 4, 2026: 18 correction orders

  • Tag 340: 144G.30 Subd. 5 Correction orders (re-issued) Level 3, widespread scope, scope/level letter I
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed provide documentation with actions taken to comply with correction orders from a survey completed on February 5, 2025.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed provide documentation with actions taken to comply with correction orders from a survey completed on February 5, 2025. The lack of action to ensure compliance with regulations had the potential to affect all residents receiving services from the licensee. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) A correction order may be issued whenever the commissioner finds upon survey or during a complaint investigation that a facility, a managerial official, an agent of the facility, or staff of the facility is not in compliance with this chapter. [...]”

  • Tag 480: 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Subd. 1a (a-b) Minimum requirements; required food services (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Not reviewed during this survey.”

    Rule cited: “(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b), food must be prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code, Minnesota Rules, chapter 4626. [...]”

  • Tag 650: 144G.42 Subd. 8 (a) Staff records (re-issued) scope/level letter D
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Not reviewed during this survey.”

    Rule cited: “(a) The facility must maintain current records of each paid staff member, each regularly scheduled volunteer providing services, and each individual contractor providing services. [...]”

  • Tag 680: 144G.42 Subd. 10 Disaster planning and emergency preparedness (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Not reviewed during this survey.”

    Rule cited: “(a) The facility must meet the following requirements: (1) have a written emergency disaster plan that contains a plan for evacuation, addresses elements of sheltering in place, identifies temporary relocation sites, and details staff assignments in the event [...]”

  • Tag 775: 144G.45 Subd. 2. (a) Fire protection and physical environment (re-issued) Level 3, widespread scope, scope/level letter I · correction period: Immediate · fine: $3,000.00 assessed
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to comply with the Minnesota State Fire Code, under Minnesota Rules Chapter 7511.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to comply with the Minnesota State Fire Code, under Minnesota Rules Chapter 7511. This had the potential to directly affect all of the residents and staff. [...]”

    Rule cited: “Each assisted living facility must comply with the State Fire Code in Minnesota Rules, chapter 7511, and:”

Show all 18
  • Tag 780: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (1) Fire protection and physical environment (re-issued) Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · fine: $500.00 assessed
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide smoke alarms inside and outside resident rooms.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to provide smoke alarms inside and outside resident rooms. This had the potential to directly affect all residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) Each assisted living facility must comply with the State Fire Code in Minnesota Rules, chapter 7511, and: (1) for dwellings or sleeping units, as defined in the State Fire Code: (i) provide smoke alarms in each room used for sleeping purposes; (ii) [...]”

  • Tag 790: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (2-3) Fire protection and physical environment (re-issued) Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to maintain fire extinguishers as required throughout the facility.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to maintain fire extinguishers as required throughout the facility. This deficient condition had the ability to affect all staff, visitors, and residents. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(2) install and maintain portable fire extinguishers in accordance with the State Fire Code; (3) install portable fire extinguishers having a minimum 2-A:10-B:C rating within Group R-3 occupancies, as defined by the State Fire Code, located so that the travel [...]”

  • Tag 810: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (b-f) Fire protection and physical environment (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Not reviewed during this survey.”

    Rule cited: “(b) Each assisted living facility shall develop and maintain fire safety and evacuation plans. [...]”

  • Tag 920: 144G.50 Subd. 2 (c) Contract information (re-issued) scope/level letter C
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Not reviewed during this survey.”

    Rule cited: “(c) The contract must include: (1) a disclosure of the category of assisted living facility license held by the facility and, if the facility is not an assisted living facility with dementia care, a disclosure that it does not hold an assisted living facility [...]”

  • Tag 940: 144G.50 Subd. 2 (e; 5-7) Contract information (re-issued) scope/level letter C
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Not reviewed during this survey.”

    Rule cited: “(5) a description of the facility's policies related to medical assistance waivers under chapter 256S and section 256B.49 and the housing support program under chapter 256I, including: (i) whether the facility is enrolled with the commissioner of human [...]”

  • Tag 1290: 144G.60 Subdivision 1 Background studies required (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Not reviewed during this survey.”

    Rule cited: “(a) Employees, contractors, and regularly scheduled volunteers of the facility are subject to the background study required by section 144.057 and may be disqualified under chapter 245C. [...]”

  • Tag 1440: 144G.62 Subd. 4 Supervision of staff providing delegated nurs (re-issued) scope/level letter D
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Not reviewed during this survey.”

    Rule cited: “(a) Staff who perform delegated nursing or therapy tasks must be supervised by an appropriate licensed health professional or a registered nurse according to the assisted living facility's policy where the services are being provided to verify that the work [...]”

  • Tag 1540: 144G.64 (a) (3) Training in Dementia, Mental Illness, and De- (re-issued) scope/level letter D
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Not reviewed during this survey.”

    Rule cited: “(3) for assisted living facilities with dementia care, direct-care staff must have completed at least eight hours of initial training on topics specified under paragraph (b) within 80 working hours of the employment start date. [...]”

  • Tag 1620: 144G.70 Subd. 2 (c-e) Initial reviews, assessments, and monitoring (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Not reviewed during this survey.”

    Rule cited: “(a) Residents who are not receiving any assisted living services shall not be required to undergo an initial nursing assessment. [...]”

  • Tag 1730: 144G.71 Subd. 5 Individualized medication management plan (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Not reviewed during this survey.”

    Rule cited: “(a) For each resident receiving medication management services, a registered nurse, advanced practice registered nurse, or qualified staff delegated the task by a registered nurse must prepare and include in the service plan a written statement of the [...]”

  • Tag 1910: 144G.71 Subd. 22 Disposition of medications (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Not reviewed during this survey.”

    Rule cited: “(a) Any current medications being managed by the assisted living facility must be provided to the resident when the resident's service plan ends or medication management services are no longer part of the service plan. [...]”

  • Tag 2100: 144G.82 Subd. 2 Additional requirements (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Not reviewed during this survey.”

    Rule cited: “(a) The licensee must follow the assisted living license requirements and the criteria in this section. [...]”

  • Tag 2110: 144G.82 Subd. 3 Policies (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Not reviewed during this survey.”

    Rule cited: “(a) In addition to the policies and procedures required in the licensing of all facilities, the assisted living facility with dementia care licensee must develop and implement policies and procedures that address the: (1) philosophy of how services are [...]”

Survey completed December 9, 2025: 18 correction orders

  • Tag 340: 144G.30 Subd. 5 Correction orders Level 3, widespread scope, scope/level letter I
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed provide documentation with actions taken to comply with correction orders from a survey completed on February 5, 2025.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed provide documentation with actions taken to comply with correction orders from a survey completed on February 5, 2025. The lack of action to ensure compliance with regulations had the potential to affect all residents receiving services from the licensee. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) A correction order may be issued whenever the commissioner finds upon survey or during a complaint investigation that a facility, a managerial official, an agent of the facility, or staff of the facility is not in compliance with this chapter. [...]”

  • Tag 480: 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Subd. 1a (a-b) Minimum requirements; required food services (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Not reviewed during this survey.”

    Rule cited: “(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b), food must be prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code, Minnesota Rules, chapter 4626. [...]”

  • Tag 650: 144G.42 Subd. 8 (a) Staff records (re-issued) scope/level letter D
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Not reviewed during this survey.”

    Rule cited: “(a) The facility must maintain current records of each paid staff member, each regularly scheduled volunteer providing services, and each individual contractor providing services. [...]”

  • Tag 680: 144G.42 Subd. 10 Disaster planning and emergency preparedness (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Not reviewed during this survey.”

    Rule cited: “(a) The facility must meet the following requirements: (1) have a written emergency disaster plan that contains a plan for evacuation, addresses elements of sheltering in place, identifies temporary relocation sites, and details staff assignments in the event [...]”

  • Tag 775: 144G.45 Subd. 2. (a) Fire protection and physical environment (re-issued) Level 3, widespread scope, scope/level letter I · correction period: Immediate · fine: $3,000.00 assessed
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to comply with the Minnesota State Fire Code, under Minnesota Rules Chapter 7511.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to comply with the Minnesota State Fire Code, under Minnesota Rules Chapter 7511. This had the potential to directly affect all of the residents and staff. [...]”

    Rule cited: “Each assisted living facility must comply with the State Fire Code in Minnesota Rules, chapter 7511, and:”

Show all 18
  • Tag 780: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (1) Fire protection and physical environment (re-issued) Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · fine: $500.00 assessed
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide smoke alarms inside and outside resident rooms.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to provide smoke alarms inside and outside resident rooms. This had the potential to directly affect all residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) Each assisted living facility must comply with the State Fire Code in Minnesota Rules, chapter 7511, and: (1) for dwellings or sleeping units, as defined in the State Fire Code: (i) provide smoke alarms in each room used for sleeping purposes; (ii) [...]”

  • Tag 790: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (2-3) Fire protection and physical environment (re-issued) Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to maintain fire extinguishers as required throughout the facility.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to maintain fire extinguishers as required throughout the facility. This deficient condition had the ability to affect all staff, visitors, and residents. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(2) install and maintain portable fire extinguishers in accordance with the State Fire Code; (3) install portable fire extinguishers having a minimum 2-A:10-B:C rating within Group R-3 occupancies, as defined by the State Fire Code, located so that the travel [...]”

  • Tag 810: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (b-f) Fire protection and physical environment (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Not reviewed during this survey.”

    Rule cited: “(b) Each assisted living facility shall develop and maintain fire safety and evacuation plans. [...]”

  • Tag 920: 144G.50 Subd. 2 (c) Contract information (re-issued) scope/level letter C
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Not reviewed during this survey.”

    Rule cited: “(c) The contract must include: (1) a disclosure of the category of assisted living facility license held by the facility and, if the facility is not an assisted living facility with dementia care, a disclosure that it does not hold an assisted living facility [...]”

  • Tag 940: 144G.50 Subd. 2 (e; 5-7) Contract information (re-issued) scope/level letter C
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Not reviewed during this survey.”

    Rule cited: “(5) a description of the facility's policies related to medical assistance waivers under chapter 256S and section 256B.49 and the housing support program under chapter 256I, including: (i) whether the facility is enrolled with the commissioner of human [...]”

  • Tag 1290: 144G.60 Subdivision 1 Background studies required (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Not reviewed during this survey.”

    Rule cited: “(a) Employees, contractors, and regularly scheduled volunteers of the facility are subject to the background study required by section 144.057 and may be disqualified under chapter 245C. [...]”

  • Tag 1440: 144G.62 Subd. 4 Supervision of staff providing delegated nurs (re-issued) scope/level letter D
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Not reviewed during this survey.”

    Rule cited: “(a) Staff who perform delegated nursing or therapy tasks must be supervised by an appropriate licensed health professional or a registered nurse according to the assisted living facility's policy where the services are being provided to verify that the work [...]”

  • Tag 1540: 144G.64 (a) (3) Training in Dementia, Mental Illness, and De- (re-issued) scope/level letter D
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Not reviewed during this survey.”

    Rule cited: “(3) for assisted living facilities with dementia care, direct-care staff must have completed at least eight hours of initial training on topics specified under paragraph (b) within 80 working hours of the employment start date. [...]”

  • Tag 1620: 144G.70 Subd. 2 (c-e) Initial reviews, assessments, and monitoring (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Not reviewed during this survey.”

    Rule cited: “(a) Residents who are not receiving any assisted living services shall not be required to undergo an initial nursing assessment. [...]”

  • Tag 1730: 144G.71 Subd. 5 Individualized medication management plan (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Not reviewed during this survey.”

    Rule cited: “(a) For each resident receiving medication management services, a registered nurse, advanced practice registered nurse, or qualified staff delegated the task by a registered nurse must prepare and include in the service plan a written statement of the [...]”

  • Tag 1910: 144G.71 Subd. 22 Disposition of medications (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Not reviewed during this survey.”

    Rule cited: “(a) Any current medications being managed by the assisted living facility must be provided to the resident when the resident's service plan ends or medication management services are no longer part of the service plan. [...]”

  • Tag 2100: 144G.82 Subd. 2 Additional requirements (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Not reviewed during this survey.”

    Rule cited: “(a) The licensee must follow the assisted living license requirements and the criteria in this section. [...]”

  • Tag 2110: 144G.82 Subd. 3 Policies (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Not reviewed during this survey.”

    Rule cited: “(a) In addition to the policies and procedures required in the licensing of all facilities, the assisted living facility with dementia care licensee must develop and implement policies and procedures that address the: (1) philosophy of how services are [...]”

Survey completed July 23, 2025: 17 correction orders

  • Tag 480: 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Subd. 1a (a-b) Minimum requirements; required food services (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Not reviewed during this survey.”

    Rule cited: “(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b), food must be prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code, Minnesota Rules, chapter 4626. [...]”

  • Tag 650: 144G.42 Subd. 8 (a) Staff records (re-issued) scope/level letter D
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Not reviewed during this survey.”

    Rule cited: “(a) The facility must maintain current records of each paid staff member, each regularly scheduled volunteer providing services, and each individual contractor providing services. [...]”

  • Tag 680: 144G.42 Subd. 10 Disaster planning and emergency preparedness (re-issued) Level 3, widespread scope, scope/level letter F
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Not reviewed during this survey. {0 775} 144G.45 Subd. 2. (a) Fire protection and physical {0 775} SS=I environment Each assisted living facility must comply with the State Fire Code in Minnesota Rules, chapter 7511, and: This MN Requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to comply with the Minnesota State Fire Code, under Minnesota Rules Chapter 7511. This had the potential to directly affect all of the residents and staff. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) The facility must meet the following requirements: (1) have a written emergency disaster plan that contains a plan for evacuation, addresses elements of sheltering in place, identifies temporary relocation sites, and details staff assignments in the event [...]”

  • Tag 775: fine: $3,000.00 assessed
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “or key code was required to exit the facility. The fire alarm system for the facility was disconnected and not in working order and there were a few smoke alarms that were missing inside and outside resident rooms. The door locks will not release upon activation of the fire alarm system if it was operational. These deficient conditions were visually verified by the HM-A on the tour. The surveyor explained that an immediate correction order will be issued for the above findings. [...]”

  • Tag 780: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (1) Fire protection and physical environment (re-issued) Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · fine: $500.00 assessed
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide smoke alarms inside and outside resident rooms.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to provide smoke alarms inside and outside resident rooms. This had the potential to directly affect all residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) Each assisted living facility must comply with the State Fire Code in Minnesota Rules, chapter 7511, and: (1) for dwellings or sleeping units, as defined in the State Fire Code: (i) provide smoke alarms in each room used for sleeping purposes; (ii) [...]”

Show all 17
  • Tag 790: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (2-3) Fire protection and physical environment (re-issued) Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to maintain fire extinguishers as required throughout the facility.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to maintain fire extinguishers as required throughout the facility. This deficient condition had the ability to affect all staff, visitors, and residents. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(2) install and maintain portable fire extinguishers in accordance with the State Fire Code; (3) install portable fire extinguishers having a minimum 2-A:10-B:C rating within Group R-3 occupancies, as defined by the State Fire Code, located so that the travel [...]”

  • Tag 810: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (b-f) Fire protection and physical environment (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Not reviewed during this survey.”

    Rule cited: “(b) Each assisted living facility shall develop and maintain fire safety and evacuation plans. [...]”

  • Tag 920: 144G.50 Subd. 2 (c) Contract information (re-issued) scope/level letter C
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Not reviewed during this survey.”

    Rule cited: “(c) The contract must include: (1) a disclosure of the category of assisted living facility license held by the facility and, if the facility is not an assisted living facility with dementia care, a disclosure that it does not hold an assisted living facility [...]”

  • Tag 940: 144G.50 Subd. 2 (e; 5-7) Contract information (re-issued) scope/level letter C
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Not reviewed during this survey.”

    Rule cited: “(5) a description of the facility's policies related to medical assistance waivers under chapter 256S and section 256B.49 and the housing support program under chapter 256I, including: (i) whether the facility is enrolled with the commissioner of human [...]”

  • Tag 1290: 144G.60 Subdivision 1 Background studies required (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Not reviewed during this survey.”

    Rule cited: “(a) Employees, contractors, and regularly scheduled volunteers of the facility are subject to the background study required by section 144.057 and may be disqualified under chapter 245C. [...]”

  • Tag 1440: 144G.62 Subd. 4 Supervision of staff providing delegated nurs (re-issued) scope/level letter D
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Not reviewed during this survey.”

    Rule cited: “(a) Staff who perform delegated nursing or therapy tasks must be supervised by an appropriate licensed health professional or a registered nurse according to the assisted living facility's policy where the services are being provided to verify that the work [...]”

  • Tag 1540: 144G.64 (a) (3) Training in Dementia, Mental Illness, and De- (re-issued) scope/level letter D
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Not reviewed during this survey.”

    Rule cited: “(3) for assisted living facilities with dementia care, direct-care staff must have completed at least eight hours of initial training on topics specified under paragraph (b) within 80 working hours of the employment start date. [...]”

  • Tag 1620: 144G.70 Subd. 2 (c-e) Initial reviews, assessments, and monitoring (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Not reviewed during this survey.”

    Rule cited: “(a) Residents who are not receiving any assisted living services shall not be required to undergo an initial nursing assessment. [...]”

  • Tag 1730: 144G.71 Subd. 5 Individualized medication management plan (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Not reviewed during this survey.”

    Rule cited: “(a) For each resident receiving medication management services, a registered nurse, advanced practice registered nurse, or qualified staff delegated the task by a registered nurse must prepare and include in the service plan a written statement of the [...]”

  • Tag 1910: 144G.71 Subd. 22 Disposition of medications (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Not reviewed during this survey.”

    Rule cited: “(a) Any current medications being managed by the assisted living facility must be provided to the resident when the resident's service plan ends or medication management services are no longer part of the service plan. [...]”

  • Tag 2100: 144G.82 Subd. 2 Additional requirements (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Not reviewed during this survey.”

    Rule cited: “(a) The licensee must follow the assisted living license requirements and the criteria in this section. [...]”

  • Tag 2110: 144G.82 Subd. 3 Policies (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Not reviewed during this survey.”

    Rule cited: “(a) In addition to the policies and procedures required in the licensing of all facilities, the assisted living facility with dementia care licensee must develop and implement policies and procedures that address the: (1) philosophy of how services are [...]”

Survey completed April 30, 2025: 17 correction orders

  • Tag 480: 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Subd. 1a (a-b) Minimum requirements; required food services (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Not reviewed during this survey.”

    Rule cited: “(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b), food must be prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code, Minnesota Rules, chapter 4626. [...]”

  • Tag 650: 144G.42 Subd. 8 (a) Staff records (re-issued) scope/level letter D
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Not reviewed during this survey.”

    Rule cited: “(a) The facility must maintain current records of each paid staff member, each regularly scheduled volunteer providing services, and each individual contractor providing services. [...]”

  • Tag 680: 144G.42 Subd. 10 Disaster planning and emergency preparedness (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Not reviewed during this survey.”

    Rule cited: “(a) The facility must meet the following requirements: (1) have a written emergency disaster plan that contains a plan for evacuation, addresses elements of sheltering in place, identifies temporary relocation sites, and details staff assignments in the event [...]”

  • Tag 775: 144G.45 Subd. 2. (a) Fire protection and physical environment (re-issued) Level 3, widespread scope, scope/level letter I · correction period: Immediate · fine: $3,000.00 assessed
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to comply with the Minnesota State Fire Code, under Minnesota Rules Chapter 7511.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to comply with the Minnesota State Fire Code, under Minnesota Rules Chapter 7511. This had the potential to directly affect all of the residents and staff. [...]”

    Rule cited: “Each assisted living facility must comply with the State Fire Code in Minnesota Rules, chapter 7511, and:”

  • Tag 780: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (1) Fire protection and physical environment (re-issued) Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · fine: $500.00 assessed
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide smoke alarms inside and outside resident rooms.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to provide smoke alarms inside and outside resident rooms. This had the potential to directly affect all residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”

    Rule cited: “for dwellings or sleeping units, as defined in the State Fire Code: (i) provide smoke alarms in each room used for sleeping purposes; (ii) provide smoke alarms outside each separate sleeping area in the immediate vicinity of bedrooms; (iii) provide smoke [...]”

Show all 17
  • Tag 790: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (2-3) Fire protection and physical environment (re-issued) Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to maintain fire extinguishers as required throughout the facility.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to maintain fire extinguishers as required throughout the facility. This deficient condition had the ability to affect all staff, visitors, and residents. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(2) install and maintain portable fire extinguishers in accordance with the State Fire Code; (3) install portable fire extinguishers having a minimum 2-A:10-B:C rating within Group R-3 occupancies, as defined by the State Fire Code, located so that the travel [...]”

  • Tag 810: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (b-f) Fire protection and physical environment (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Not reviewed during this survey.”

    Rule cited: “(b) Each assisted living facility shall develop and maintain fire safety and evacuation plans. [...]”

  • Tag 920: 144G.50 Subd. 2 (c) Contract information (re-issued) scope/level letter C
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Not reviewed during this survey.”

    Rule cited: “(c) The contract must include: (1) a disclosure of the category of assisted living facility license held by the facility and, if the facility is not an assisted living facility with dementia care, a disclosure that it does not hold an assisted living facility [...]”

  • Tag 940: 144G.50 Subd. 2 (e; 5-7) Contract information (re-issued) scope/level letter C
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Not reviewed during this survey.”

    Rule cited: “(5) a description of the facility's policies related to medical assistance waivers under chapter 256S and section 256B.49 and the housing support program under chapter 256I, including: (i) whether the facility is enrolled with the commissioner of human [...]”

  • Tag 1290: 144G.60 Subdivision 1 Background studies required (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Not reviewed during this survey.”

    Rule cited: “(a) Employees, contractors, and regularly scheduled volunteers of the facility are subject to the background study required by section 144.057 and may be disqualified under chapter 245C. [...]”

  • Tag 1440: 144G.62 Subd. 4 Supervision of staff providing delegated nurs (re-issued) scope/level letter D
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Not reviewed during this survey.”

    Rule cited: “(a) Staff who perform delegated nursing or therapy tasks must be supervised by an appropriate licensed health professional or a registered nurse according to the assisted living facility's policy where the services are being provided to verify that the work [...]”

  • Tag 1540: 144G.64 (a) TRAINING IN DEMENTIA CARE REQUIRED (re-issued) scope/level letter D
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Not reviewed during this survey.”

    Rule cited: “(3) for assisted living facilities with dementia care, direct-care employees must have completed at least eight hours of initial training on topics specified under paragraph (b) within 80 working hours of the employment start date. [...]”

  • Tag 1620: 144G.70 Subd. 2 (c-e) Initial reviews, assessments, and monitoring (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Not reviewed during this survey.”

    Rule cited: “(c) Resident reassessment and monitoring must be conducted no more than 14 calendar days after initiation of services. [...]”

  • Tag 1730: 144G.71 Subd. 5 Individualized medication management plan (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Not reviewed during this survey.”

    Rule cited: “(a) For each resident receiving medication management services, the assisted living facility must prepare and include in the service plan a written statement of the medication management services that will be provided to the resident. [...]”

  • Tag 1910: 144G.71 Subd. 22 Disposition of medications (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Not reviewed during this survey.”

    Rule cited: “(a) Any current medications being managed by the assisted living facility must be provided to the resident when the resident's service plan ends or medication management services are no longer part of the service plan. [...]”

  • Tag 2100: 144G.82 Subd. 2 Additional requirements (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Not reviewed during this survey.”

    Rule cited: “(a) The licensee must follow the assisted living license requirements and the criteria in this section. [...]”

  • Tag 2110: 144G.82 Subd. 3 Policies (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Not reviewed during this survey.”

    Rule cited: “(a) In addition to the policies and procedures required in the licensing of all facilities, the assisted living facility with dementia care licensee must develop and implement policies and procedures that address the: (1) philosophy of how services are [...]”

Survey completed February 7, 2025: 17 correction orders

  • Tag 480: 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Subd. 1a (a-b) Minimum requirements; required food services Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Please refer
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code. This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death), and is issued at a widespread scope (when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b), food must be prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code, Minnesota Rules, chapter 4626. [...]”

  • Tag 650: 144G.42 Subd. 8 (a) Staff records Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the employee records contained the required content for one of two employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-D).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the employee records contained the required content for one of two employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-D). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) The facility must maintain current records of each paid staff member, each regularly scheduled volunteer providing services, and each individual contractor providing services. [...]”

  • Tag 680: 144G.42 Subd. 10 Disaster planning and emergency preparedness Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to have a written emergency preparedness plan (EPP) with all the required content.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to have a written emergency preparedness plan (EPP) with all the required content. This had the potential to affect all visitors, employees, and residents. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) The facility must meet the following requirements: (1) have a written emergency disaster plan that contains a plan for evacuation, addresses elements of sheltering in place, identifies temporary relocation sites, and details staff assignments in the event [...]”

  • Tag 775: 144G.45 Subd. 2. (a) Fire protection and physical environment Level 3, widespread scope, scope/level letter I · correction period: Immediate · fine: $3,000.00 assessed
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to comply with the Minnesota State Fire Code, under Minnesota Rules Chapter 7511.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to comply with the Minnesota State Fire Code, under Minnesota Rules Chapter 7511. This had the potential to directly affect all of the residents and staff. [...]”

    Rule cited: “Each assisted living facility must comply with the State Fire Code in Minnesota Rules, chapter 7511, and:”

  • Tag 780: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (1) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Two (2) days · fine: $500.00 assessed
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide smoke alarms inside and outside resident rooms.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to provide smoke alarms inside and outside resident rooms. This had the potential to directly affect all residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”

    Rule cited: “for dwellings or sleeping units, as defined in the State Fire Code: (i) provide smoke alarms in each room used for sleeping purposes; (ii) provide smoke alarms outside each separate sleeping area in the immediate vicinity of bedrooms; (iii) provide smoke [...]”

Show all 17
  • Tag 790: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (2-3) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to maintain fire extinguishers as required throughout the facility.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to maintain fire extinguishers as required throughout the facility. This deficient condition had the ability to affect all staff, visitors, and residents. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(2) install and maintain portable fire extinguishers in accordance with the State Fire Code; (3) install portable fire extinguishers having a minimum 2-A:10-B:C rating within Group R-3 occupancies, as defined by the State Fire Code, located so that the travel [...]”

  • Tag 810: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (b-f) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop the fire safety and evacuation plan with the required content, the licensee failed to document required fire safety evacuation training for employees and residents and complete the required annual fire drills.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to develop the fire safety and evacuation plan with the required content, the licensee failed to document required fire safety evacuation training for employees and residents and complete the required annual fire drills. This had the potential to directly affect all residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(b) Each assisted living facility shall develop and maintain fire safety and evacuation plans. [...]”

  • Tag 920: 144G.50 Subd. 2 (c) Contract information Level 1, widespread scope, scope/level letter C · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to execute a written assisted living contract with the required content for one resident (R2).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to execute a written assisted living contract with the required content for one resident (R2). This practice resulted in a level one violation (a violation that has no potential to cause more than a minimal impact on the resident and does not affect health or safety), and was issued at a widespread scope (when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has affected or has potential to affect a large portion or all of the [...]”

    Rule cited: “(c) The contract must include: (1) a disclosure of the category of assisted living facility license held by the facility and, if the facility is not an assisted living facility with dementia care, a disclosure that it does not hold an assisted living facility [...]”

  • Tag 940: 144G.50 Subd. 2 (e; 5-7) Contract information Level 1, widespread scope, scope/level letter C · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to execute a written contract with the required content for one of one resident (R2).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to execute a written contract with the required content for one of one resident (R2). This practice resulted in a level one violation (a violation that has no potential to cause more than a minimal impact on the resident and does not affect health or safety), and was issued at a widespread scope (when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has affected or has potential to affect a large portion or all of the [...]”

    Rule cited: “(5) a description of the facility's policies related to medical assistance waivers under chapter 256S and section 256B.49 and the housing support program under chapter 256I, including: (i) whether the facility is enrolled with the commissioner of human [...]”

  • Tag 1290: 144G.60 Subdivision 1 Background studies required Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: 2 days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure a background study was affiliated to the current health facility identification (HFID) number for two of two employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-D and clincal nurse supervisor(CNS)-B, on the facility provided employee roster.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure a background study was affiliated to the current health facility identification (HFID) number for two of two employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-D and clincal nurse supervisor(CNS)-B, on the facility provided employee roster. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) Employees, contractors, and regularly scheduled volunteers of the facility are subject to the background study required by section 144.057 and may be disqualified under chapter 245C. [...]”

  • Tag 1440: 144G.62 Subd. 4 Supervision of staff providing delegated nurs Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure a registered nurse (RN) conducted direct supervision of staff performing a delegated task within 30 days of providing services for one of one employee (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-D).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure a registered nurse (RN) conducted direct supervision of staff performing a delegated task within 30 days of providing services for one of one employee (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-D). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) Staff who perform delegated nursing or therapy tasks must be supervised by an appropriate licensed health professional or a registered nurse according to the assisted living facility's policy where the services are being provided to verify that the work [...]”

  • Tag 1540: 144G.64 (a) TRAINING IN DEMENTIA CARE REQUIRED Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure one of one unlicensed personnel (ULP)-D received the required eight hours of dementia care training in the required time frame.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure one of one unlicensed personnel (ULP)-D received the required eight hours of dementia care training in the required time frame. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(3) for assisted living facilities with dementia care, direct-care employees must have completed at least eight hours of initial training on topics specified under paragraph (b) within 80 working hours of the employment start date. [...]”

  • Tag 1620: 144G.70 Subd. 2 (c-e) Initial reviews, assessments, and monitoring Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse used the uniform assessment tool for ongoing assessments and monitoring for one of one resident (R2). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(c) Resident reassessment and monitoring must be conducted no more than 14 calendar days after initiation of services. [...]”

  • Tag 1730: 144G.71 Subd. 5 Individualized medication management plan Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop and maintain a current individualized medication management record for each resident to include all required content for one of one resident (R2).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to develop and maintain a current individualized medication management record for each resident to include all required content for one of one resident (R2). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) For each resident receiving medication management services, the assisted living facility must prepare and include in the service plan a written statement of the medication management services that will be provided to the resident. [...]”

  • Tag 1910: 144G.71 Subd. 22 Disposition of medications Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7)
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to document in the resident's record all required content for disposition of medications for one of one resident (R1) upon discharge.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to document in the resident's record all required content for disposition of medications for one of one resident (R1) upon discharge. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) Any current medications being managed by the assisted living facility must be provided to the resident when the resident's service plan ends or medication management services are no longer part of the service plan. [...]”

  • Tag 2100: 144G.82 Subd. 2 Additional requirements Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the licensed assisted living director (LALD)-A completed and documented 10 hours of continuing education related to the care of individuals with dementia.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the licensed assisted living director (LALD)-A completed and documented 10 hours of continuing education related to the care of individuals with dementia. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) The licensee must follow the assisted living license requirements and the criteria in this section. [...]”

  • Tag 2110: 144G.82 Subd. 3 Policies Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure policies and procedures required in the licensing of assisted living facilities with dementia care were developed or implemented, and provided to each resident and/or the resident's legal and designated representative at the time of move-in.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure policies and procedures required in the licensing of assisted living facilities with dementia care were developed or implemented, and provided to each resident and/or the resident's legal and designated representative at the time of move-in. This had the potential to affect all dementia care residents, staff and visitors. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) In addition to the policies and procedures required in the licensing of all facilities, the assisted living facility with dementia care licensee must develop and implement policies and procedures that address the: (1) philosophy of how services are [...]”

Fines assessed by MDH

  • Tag 775 (144g.45 Subd. 2. (a) - Fire Protection And Physical Environment): $3,000.00
  • Tag 780 (144g.45 Subd. 2 (a) (1) - Fire Protection And Physical Environment): $500.00

Total fines assessed, as printed in the letter: $2,500.00.

Total fines assessed, as printed in the letter: $3,000.00.

Total fines assessed, as printed in the letter: $2,000.00.

Total fines assessed, as printed in the letter: $3,500.00.

Earlier evaluations (1)
  • August 16, 2022: report GCMS11 · 23 correction orders
    Details

    Survey completed August 16, 2022: 23 correction orders

    • Tag 430: 144G.40 Subd. 2 Uniform checklist disclosure of services Level 1, widespread scope, scope/level letter C · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide licensee's Uniform Disclosure of Assisted Living Services and Amenities (UDALSA) to two of two residents (R1, R2) with records reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to provide licensee's Uniform Disclosure of Assisted Living Services and Amenities (UDALSA) to two of two residents (R1, R2) with records reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) All assisted living facilities must provide to prospective residents: (1) a disclosure of the categories of assisted living licenses available and the category of license held by the facility; (2) a written checklist listing all services permitted under [...]”

    • Tag 480: 144G.41 Subd 1 (13) (i) (B) Minimum requirements Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code. This had the potential to affect all five residents. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(13) offer to provide or make available at least the following services to residents: (i) at least three nutritious meals daily with snacks available seven days per week, according to the recommended dietary allowances in the United States Department of [...]”

    • Tag 580: 144G.42 Subd. 2 Quality management Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to maintain documentation of a quality management activity.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to maintain documentation of a quality management activity. This had the potential to affect all five residents receiving assisted living with dementia care services. [...]”

      Rule cited: “The facility shall engage in quality management appropriate to the size of the facility and relevant to the type of services provided. [...]”

    • Tag 650: 144G.42 Subd. 8 Employee records Level 2, pattern scope, scope/level letter E · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the employee records contained the required content for two of two employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-C and ULP-D), with records reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the employee records contained the required content for two of two employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-C and ULP-D), with records reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) The facility must maintain current records of each paid employee, each regularly scheduled volunteer providing services, and each individual contractor providing services. [...]”

    • Tag 680: 144G.42 Subd. 10 Disaster planning and emergency preparedness Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to have a written emergency preparedness plan with all the required content.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to have a written emergency preparedness plan with all the required content. This had the potential to affect all five residents receiving services under the assisted living with dementia care license. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) The facility must meet the following requirements: (1) have a written emergency disaster plan that contains a plan for evacuation, addresses elements of sheltering in place, identifies temporary relocation sites, and details staff assignments in the event [...]”

    Show all 23
    • Tag 780: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (1) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to maintain smoke alarms that are interconnected throughout the facility.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to maintain smoke alarms that are interconnected throughout the facility. This deficient condition had the ability to affect all staff and residents. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) Each assisted living facility must comply with the State Fire Code in Minnesota Rules, chapter 7511, and: (1) for dwellings or sleeping units, as defined in the State Fire Code: (i) provide smoke alarms in each room used for sleeping purposes; (ii) [...]”

    • Tag 800: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (4) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide the physical environment in a continuous state of good repair and operation with regard to the health, safety, and well-being of the residents.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to provide the physical environment in a continuous state of good repair and operation with regard to the health, safety, and well-being of the residents. This had the potential to directly affect all residents and staff. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(4) keep the physical environment, including walls, floors, ceiling, all furnishings, grounds, systems, and equipment in a continuous state of good repair and operation with regard to the health, safety, comfort, and well-being of the residents in accordance [...]”

    • Tag 810: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (b)-(f) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop a fire safety and evacuation plan with required elements, failed to provide required employee and resident training on fire safety and evacuation, and failed to conduct required evacuation drills.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to develop a fire safety and evacuation plan with required elements, failed to provide required employee and resident training on fire safety and evacuation, and failed to conduct required evacuation drills. This had the potential to affect all staff, residents, and visitors. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(b) Each assisted living facility shall develop and maintain fire safety and evacuation plans. [...]”

    • Tag 910: 144G.50 Subd. 2 (a-b) Contract information Level 1, widespread scope, scope/level letter C · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to execute a written contract with the required content for two of two residents (R1, R2) with records reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to execute a written contract with the required content for two of two residents (R1, R2) with records reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) The contract must include in a conspicuous place and manner on the contract the legal name and the license number of the facility. [...]”

    • Tag 920: 144G.50 Subd. 2 (c) Contract information Level 1, widespread scope, scope/level letter C · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to execute a written assisted living contract with the required content for two of two residents (R1, R2) with records reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to execute a written assisted living contract with the required content for two of two residents (R1, R2) with records reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(c) The contract must include: (1) a disclosure of the category of assisted living facility license held by the facility and, if the facility is not an assisted living facility with dementia care, a disclosure that it does not hold an assisted living facility [...]”

    • Tag 930: 144G.50 Subd. 2 (d-e; 1-4) Contract information Level 1, widespread scope, scope/level letter C · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to execute a written assisted living contract with all required content for two of two residents (R1, R2) with records reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to execute a written assisted living contract with all required content for two of two residents (R1, R2) with records reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(d) The contract must include a description of the facility's complaint resolution process available to residents, including the name and contact information of the person representing the facility who is designated to handle and resolve complaints. [...]”

    • Tag 940: 144G.50 Subd. 2 (e; 5-7) Contract information Level 1, widespread scope, scope/level letter C · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to execute a written contract with the required content for two of two residents (R1, R2) with records reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to execute a written contract with the required content for two of two residents (R1, R2) with records reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(5) a description of the facility's policies related to medical assistance waivers under chapter 256S and section 256B.49 and the housing support program under chapter 256I, including: (i) whether the facility is enrolled with the commissioner of human [...]”

    • Tag 970: 144.50 Subd. 5 Waivers of liability prohibited Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the assisted living contract did not include language waiving the

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the assisted living contract did not include language waiving the facility's liability for health, safety, or personal property of a resident. This had the potential to affect all residents. [...]”

      Rule cited: “The contract must not include a waiver of facility liability for the health and safety or personal property of a resident. [...]”

    • Tag 1060: 144G.52 Subd. 9 Emergency relocation Level 2, pattern scope, scope/level letter E · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to notify the Office of Ombudsman for Long-Term Care of resident relocation within four days for two of two residents (R4, R5) with record reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to notify the Office of Ombudsman for Long-Term Care of resident relocation within four days for two of two residents (R4, R5) with record reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) A facility may remove a resident from the facility in an emergency if necessary due to a resident's urgent medical needs or an imminent risk the resident poses to the health or safety of another facility resident or facility staff member. [...]”

    • Tag 1620: 144G.70 Subd. 2 (c-e) Initial reviews, assessments, and monitoring Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) completed a comprehensive smoking assessment for one of one resident (R2) with records reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) completed a comprehensive smoking assessment for one of one resident (R2) with records reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(c) Resident reassessment and monitoring must be conducted no more than 14 calendar days after initiation of services. [...]”

    • Tag 1650: 144G.70 Subd. 4 (f) Service plan, implementation and revisions to Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the service plan included all required content for two of two residents (R2, R1) with records reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the service plan included all required content for two of two residents (R2, R1) with records reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(f) The service plan must include: (1) a description of the services to be provided, the fees for services, and the frequency of each service, according to the resident's current assessment and resident preferences; (2) the identification of staff or [...]”

    • Tag 1730: 144G.71 Subd. 5 Individualized medication management plan Level 2, pattern scope, scope/level letter E · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop and maintain a current individualized medication management record for each resident to include all required content for two of two residents (R2, R1) with records reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to develop and maintain a current individualized medication management record for each resident to include all required content for two of two residents (R2, R1) with records reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) For each resident receiving medication management services, the assisted living facility must prepare and include in the service plan a written statement of the medication management services that will be provided to the resident. [...]”

    • Tag 1760: 144G.71 Subd. 8 Documentation of administration of medication Level 2, pattern scope, scope/level letter E · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure as needed (PRN)

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure as needed (PRN) medications had documentation of effectiveness after administration for one of two residents (R2) with records reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “Each medication administered by the assisted living facility staff must be documented in the resident's record. The documentation must include the signature and title of the person who administered the medication. [...]”

    • Tag 1770: 144G.71 Subd. 9 Documentation of medication setup Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the license failed to ensure documentation of medication setup was completed at the time of setup and included all the required content for one of one resident (R6) with records reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “Documentation of dates of medication setup, name of medication, quantity of dose, times to be administered, route of administration, and name of person completing medication setup must be done at the time of setup.”

    • Tag 1940: 144G.72 Subd. 3 Individualized treatment or therapy managemen Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7)
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop individual treatment management plans with all required content for one of two residents (R1) who received ordered treatments.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to develop individual treatment management plans with all required content for one of two residents (R1) who received ordered treatments. [...]”

      Rule cited: “For each resident receiving management of ordered or prescribed treatments or therapy services, the assisted living facility must prepare and include in the service plan a written statement of the treatment or therapy services that will be provided to the [...]”

    • Tag 2040: 144G.81 Subdivision 1 Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide a hazard vulnerability or safety risk assessment that included hazards identified on and around the property.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on document review and interview, the licensee failed to provide a hazard vulnerability or safety risk assessment that included hazards identified on and around the property. Mitigation of property hazards to protect residents from harm was not included. This had the potential to directly affect all residents and staff. [...]”

      Rule cited: “An assisted living facility with dementia care that has a secured dementia care unit must meet the requirements of section 144G.45 and the following additional requirements: (1) a hazard vulnerability assessment or safety risk must be performed on and around [...]”

    • Tag 2140: 144G.83 Subd. 3 Supervising staff training Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the designated person overseeing staff training in the care of individuals

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the designated person overseeing staff training in the care of individuals with dementia had documented evidence of competency, or a knowledge test required by the commissioner. This had the potential to affect all residents, staff and visitors. [...]”

      Rule cited: “Persons providing or overseeing staff training must have experience and knowledge in the care of individuals with dementia, including: (1) two years of work experience related to Alzheimer's disease or other dementias, or in health care, gerontology, or [...]”

    • Tag 2170: 144G.84 SERVICES FOR RESIDENTS WITH DEMENTIA Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to have an evaluation for an activity plan for two of two residents (R1, R2) who resided in the dementia-care licensed facility.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to have an evaluation for an activity plan for two of two residents (R1, R2) who resided in the dementia-care licensed facility. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(b) Each resident must be evaluated for activities according to the licensing rules of the facility. [...]”

    From MDH’s letter: no immediate fines.

Substantiated investigations (state reports)

  • March 12, 2024 · report HL364406866C
    Details

    Survey completed March 12, 2024: 1 correction order

    • Tag 100: 144G.10 Subdivision 1 License required Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven-days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee provided assisted living services to eight residents while under an expired an assisted living facility with dementia license.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and document review, the licensee provided assisted living services to eight residents while under an expired an assisted living facility with dementia license. The expired license-holder provided documentation indicating residents were admitted and services initiated in the months the license had expired and not renewed. This potentially affected all the persons living at the building. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a)(1)Beginning August 1, 2021, no assisted living facility may operate in Minnesota unless it is licensed under this chapter. [...]”

What the levels and scopes mean (MDH’s words)

Level 1: “a violation that has no potential to cause more than a minimal impact on the resident and does not affect health or safety”

Level 2: “a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death”

Level 3: “a violation that harmed a resident's health or safety, not including serious injury, impairment, or death, or a violation that has the potential to lead to serious injury, impairment, or death”

Isolated scope: “when one or a limited number of residents are affected or one or a limited number of staff are involved, or the situation has occurred only occasionally”

Pattern scope: “when more than a limited number of residents are affected, more than a limited number of staff are involved, or the situation has occurred repeatedly; but is not found to be pervasive”

Widespread scope: “when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has affected or has the potential to affect a large portion or all of the residents”

Summaries are ours and are marked “Summary”; quoted text is MDH’s own, shortened where marked [...]. Read the full reports at the links above or search every report on MDH’s site.

What these terms mean

MDH: “An evaluation is a process regulated by the division to ensure licensees comply with the laws, rules, and certifications for the type of care and services authorized under their license/certification.”

“An investigation may occur when the division is notified that care and services are not being provided by licensees as required by law. This may include allegations of abuse, neglect, or financial misuse.”

For maltreatment, Minnesota law defines substantiated as “a preponderance of the evidence shows that an act that meets the definition of maltreatment occurred” and inconclusive as “less than a preponderance of evidence to show that maltreatment did or did not occur” (Minn. Stat. 626.5572).

Correction orders, as MDH explains on each state form: “Tag numbers have been assigned to Minnesota State Statutes for Assisted Living Facilities.” “The letter in the left column is used for tracking purposes and reflects the scope and level issued pursuant to 144G.31 subd. 1, 2, and 3.” MDH adds that there is no requirement to submit a plan of correction for violations of Minnesota state statutes.

MDH keeps investigation results for seven years when allegations are substantiated, four years when inconclusive, and three years when unsubstantiated, so the counts cover different periods. This community is licensed for 12 residents; larger communities are evaluated and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division, data as of September 28, 2026. Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.

License and ownershipActive license, licensee S&O'S ASSISTED LIVING LLC
License type
Assisted Living Facility Dementia Care
License number
425011
License status
Active
Current license dated
2025-10-01
Licensed capacity
12
Licensee
S&O'S ASSISTED LIVING LLC
Administrator/Authorized Agent
Ashley Thompson

Source: Minnesota state licensing records (agency listing), retrieved 2026-09-09. Licensing status is a matter of public record; it is not a quality rating.

Administrator/Authorized Agent name from the Minnesota licensing record, as of Sep 9, 2026.

Paying with Medicaid and other programsHow Medicaid pays for care in Minnesota, and other programs

How Medicaid pays for care in Minnesota

  • Elderly Waiver (EW), customized living services. Minnesota's Elderly Waiver, part of Medical Assistance (Minnesota Medicaid), can pay for "customized living" services, and a provider of those services must hold an assisted living license (or meet certain exceptions). You must qualify for Medical Assistance and need a nursing-home level of care. (state page)

Ask the community whether it accepts Medicaid.

Location and nearby careNearest hospital 13.6 mi, nursing home 11.1 mi, pharmacy 19.3 mi
Nearest hospital with an emergency room
Burnett Medical Center, Grantsburg. 13.6 miles away, straight line.
Nearest Medicare nursing home
The Estates at Rush City LLC, Rush City. 11.1 miles away, straight line.
Nearest home health agency office
Kanabec County Community Health, Mora. 16.1 miles away, straight line. Agencies travel to clients, so ask which ones serve this address.
Nearest pharmacy
Thrifty White Pharmacy. 19.3 miles away, straight line. From OpenStreetMap, which does not list every pharmacy, so one may be closer.
Area
USDA classes ZIP code 55063 as metropolitan (metropolitan low commuting).
Hospice
7 Medicare hospices tell CMS they serve ZIP code 55063.
Nearest geriatric medicine practice
Fairview Health Services, Princeton. 36.2 miles away, straight line. 1 geriatric medicine doctor listed there.

Distances are straight lines from the community, not driving distance. Hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors come from CMS provider data (CMS, hospital list updated Jul 22, 2026). Star ratings are CMS’s own.

Emergency and natural hazard riskFEMA overall risk relatively moderate; outside FEMA's high-risk flood areas

Public hazard maps for this location. Ask the community about its emergency plan, its generator and where residents would go in an evacuation.

Flood zone
Outside the high and moderate risk flood areas on FEMA's flood map (Zone X, minimal flood hazard, or not studied). (FEMA flood map)
FEMA National Risk Index
Overall: relatively moderate. By hazard: inland flooding relatively high, wildfire relatively low, tornado relatively moderate, heat wave relatively low, earthquake very low. These are FEMA’s ratings for the census tract, compared with tracts nationwide. (FEMA, December 2025)

A flood zone describes the map at this point, not the building's elevation. In an emergency, follow the local emergency management agency.

Questions to ask on a tour10 questions picked for this community from its record

Picked for this community from its record. Ask them in person and write down the answers.

  1. The current license dates from 2025. Has the owner or operator changed recently?
  2. What does the base rate include, and when did rates last go up?
  3. How many caregivers work in memory care during the day, the evening and overnight, and for how many residents?
  4. What dementia training does each caregiver get before working alone, and every year after?
  5. How do staff respond when a resident is agitated, frightened or tries to leave?
  6. How many caregivers are on duty during the day and at night?
  7. What happens if care needs increase? When would someone need to move?
  8. What fees are charged at move-in?
  9. How do you tell families about falls, illness or changes?
  10. How long have the executive director and the head of care been here?
What we checked11 public sources we searched, with dates

Every public source we searched for this community. “Nothing on record” means we found no record that matched it. A record can be missed when a name or address differs.

SourceData as ofWhat we found
Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division inspection recordsSep 28, 2026See above
U.S. Department of Labor wage and hour casesOct 15, 2026Nothing on record
OSHA workplace safety inspections since 2016Oct 15, 2026Nothing on record
FEMA flood mapSee above
USDA wildfire riskApr 15, 2026Not shown: FEMA rates wildfire risk here relatively low
FEMA National Risk IndexSee above
CMS hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors; OpenStreetMap pharmaciesSee above
HUD Multifamily Properties - AssistedJul 6, 2026Nothing on record
State Veterans Homes (NASVH directory)Sep 20, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Hospice - General InformationAug 19, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Home Health Care AgenciesMay 27, 2026Nothing on record
Common questionsAnswers to 4 questions families ask
What type of care does S&O's Assisted Living provide?

S&O's Assisted Living is licensed by the state of Minnesota for assisted living, memory care in Pine City, Minnesota. Its licensed capacity is 12 residents.

Does Lilisity rate S&O's Assisted Living?

No. We publish state licensing details for S&O's Assisted Living but no score, rating, or ranking. Only communities on the Top Communities list or with a Senior Living Alliance Excellence Award, both based on phone-verified resident and family interviews, are ranked.

How much does S&O's Assisted Living cost?

Assisted Living in Minnesota typically starts at $2,200 to $4,800 a month. Based on 74 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price. S&O's Assisted Living does not publish its prices.

How do I contact S&O's Assisted Living?

Visit S&O's Assisted Living at 14856 Edgewater Road Ne, Pine City, MN 55063.

Choosing assisted livingOur care guide: what to look for, what it costs, how families pay, and more questions to ask (PDF)

Report a wrong fact

How Lilisity works. The only scores or rankings Lilisity publishes are the Top Communities list and the Excellence Awards, both built from phone-verified resident and family interviews. Communities can pay Lilisity a flat monthly fee to manage their own listing: photos, prices, contact details, and receiving the inquiries families choose to send them. The fee is the same no matter how many families contact them or move in. Senior Living Alliance, which runs Lilisity, offers the same listing to its member communities as part of their membership; members pay SLA for its resident and family interview program. No community pays Lilisity per inquiry, per referral or per move-in. Payment never changes a testimonial, a rating, or the order of search results. The "Nearby Senior Living Alliance communities" box shows member communities only. How we verify testimonials · How we are paid